Baku urges to iron out tensions on border with Armenia through bilateral contacts

TASS, Russia
WorldMay 16, 9:59

BAKU, May 16. /TASS/. Azerbaijan’s Foreign Ministry believes tensions on the border with Armenia could be ironed out through bilateral contacts on the basis of a constructive dialogue between the sides, Spokesperson Leila Abdullayeva told reporters on Sunday.

“Armenia’s attempts to use this issue as a political means are unacceptable. <...> We advise Armenia’s political and military circles <...> not to stir up the situation in the region unfoundedly and solve border issues via bilateral channels based on constructive work with the Azerbaijani side,” the spokesperson said.

The spokesperson voiced regret that “a technical issue is whipped up by provocative statements and a smear campaign against Azerbaijan.” According to her, shortly after tensions flared up on the border the Azerbaijani Border Service’s leadership headed to the region and launched talks with the border guards of the opposite side.

“Currently, certain steps are being taken in order to normalize the situation,” the spokesperson said. The Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry believes that “such cases can and should be solved between the two countries’ border services on the basis of mutual contacts.”

On Wednesday, the Armenian Defense Ministry said that Azerbaijan’s armed forces had tried to carry out “certain work” early in the morning in one of the border districts of the Syunik Province. According to the ministry, after measures taken by Armenia’s forces the Azerbaijani military halted this work and talks were underway to settle the situation. Later in the evening that day, Armenia’s Acting Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said that the Azerbaijani armed forces had crossed Armenia’s state border, advancing 3.5 kilometers deep into its territory.

In its turn, Azerbaijan’s Foreign Ministry stated that its troops were moving “on the positions controlled by Azerbaijan.”

On Friday, the press service of Armenia’s Foreign Ministry reported that Armenian Acting Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan had sent letters to the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) Council Chairman, President of Tajikistan Emomali Rahmon, as well as to other members of the organization, over the situation along the Armenian-Azerbaijani border with a request to initiate consultations in accordance with the Article 2 of the Treaty. According to this article, in the event of a threat to the security, stability, or territorial integrity and sovereignty of one or several of the member states, or a threat to international peace and security, the member states must immediately engage a joint consultations mechanism in order to coordinate their positions, as well as define and take measures in order to eliminate the emerging threat.

Later on Friday, CSTO Spokesman Vladimir Zainetdinov told TASS that the consultations were expected to be held in the coming days.

 

Asbarez: Destruction of More Armenian Monuments in Hadrut Reported

May 4, 2021



A satellite image of the destroyed Mets Tagher cemetery in Hadrut (CHW photo)

An Armenian cemetery in the village if Mets Tagher in Artsakh’s Hadrut district has been destroyed by Azerbaijanis, who not control the area since the November 9 agreement.

A group called Caucasus Heritage Watch, which monitors and documents endangered and damaged cultural heritage using satellite imagery, reported in a Twitter post on Tuesday.

CHW, which is comprised of researchers at Cornell and Purdue Universities, said the Armenian cemetery in Mets Tagher was founded in the early 19th century and was in use when Armenians evacuated the village in 2020. Satellite imagery shows its complete destruction. Signs of bulldozer scars can be seen.

Satellite image of the Holy Savior Church in Hadrut (CHW photo)

In the same village, CHW warned, the Surb Amenaprkitch (Holy Savior) church, founded 1846, appears to be threatened by construction. As of April the area just east of the church was bulldozed, and trucks were parked in the clearing.
This is the latest in a string of reports detailing Azerbaijan’s systematic destruction, demolition or desecration of Armenian churches and monuments.

Artsakh’s Human Rights Defender reported Monday that the Ghazanchetstots Cathedral in Shushi was being dismantled, with all traces of its Armenian characteristics having been erased, including the dome of the iconic church.

There is no way to logically deny the Armenian Genocide

Greek City Times
May 3 2021
by Guest Contributor

In light of the recent recognition of the Armenian Genocide by U.S. President Joe Biden not one week ago, I’d like to take this time to debunk some common denialist “arguments” spread by “historians” such as Bernard Lewis and Justin McCarthy.

Their main thesis is basically “The Armenians rebelled and killed over a million Turks and Kurds so the Ottomans had to relocate them. Only 40,000 Armenians died in relocation to Syria, where the Ottomans fed and cared for them. Oh yeah and there weren’t even 1.5 million Armenians in the empire so the 1.5 million number is a big lie.”

Summed up in the infographic below:

These “arguments” are littered with holes and fallacies, not least of which is the “they rebelled so we had to deport them” excuse.

Armenians were the last out of 39 Ottoman nations to rebel, remaining loyal when everyone else did.

Accordingly:

“In the early 19th century, the Ottoman army had smashed the Kurdish principalities of eastern Anatolia in the view of centralizing reform efforts, but without establishing a new order in their place. The Ottoman governments instead opted for a delegation of force to various rival local actors, who were supposed to keep each other under control and were given specific powers, weapons or privileges.

As a result, many regions were affected by power struggles between provincial administration and military organs, irregular tribal regiments, and local notables. The settlement of nomads and the settlement of the many Muslim refugees from the Crimea, the Caucasus and the Balkans – which were often not given sufficient livelihood and could not otherwise provide than by plunder and stealing – exacerbated the conflicts.
Since the middle of the 19th century, the daily lives of many Armenian villages have been characterized by an excess of everyday violence, robberies and attacks against which the Armenian peasants could scarcely defend themselves, also because they as Christians had no right to carry weapons.

The Armenian Patriarchate, as well as the Armenian National Assembly, sent innumerable petitions to the Ottoman central government asking for punishment of the crimes, which were ignored. At the end of the 1880s and early 1890s, Armenian revolutionary parties were formed, which fought against the autocratic regime of Sultan Abdulhamid II and the reinstatement of the 1876 constitution along with the Young Turk revolutionaries.”

So basically any “revolt for a Greater Armenia” as the denialists claim, was brought on by the Ottomans themselves.

Second, the denialists like to deflect and say “look at all the Turks and Kurds killed by the Armenians!!! That’s genocide isn’t it??” Well, as tragic as those deaths were, you cannot logically accuse the Armenians, but not the Turks, of genocide.

The approximate definition of “genocide” is as follows: “A concentrated effort by a centralized authority to, in whole or part, remove an ethnic group and/or religion.”

There was no Armenian state at the time of these events the denialists refer to! There was no centralized authority coordinating it. So how can this be a genocide if no one party is organizing it, is the question I ask? (Answer, it’s not and anytime a denialist says this it is not worth taking even 1/10th seriously)

Now as for the “There weren’t even 1.5 million bla bla bla” argument, uh yes there were.

The only sources claiming this were Ottoman records, which were terribly and deliberately flawed.

In response to the insurgency which the Ottomans started, they butchered 200,000 to 400,000 Armenians in the Hamidian Massacres of 1894-1896, and 20,000 to 30,000 Armenians in the Adana Massacre of 1909.

Regarding the deportations and genocide of 1915 and afterwards, Talaat Pasha himself conceded “the death toll was 800,000 but undercount of 30% is likely” and hundreds thousands more were killed in Kars, Igdir etc in 1918-1920.

Therefore the Armenian Genocide’s death toll in actuality is anywhere from 1 million to 2 million, but to be fair, let’s go with 1.5 million.

So yeah, “not even 1.5 million bla bla bla,” guess what, there were.

Second, “there is no document proving genocidal intent of the Ottomans! All there is, is orders to move them.”

First of all the denialists like to corroborate this theory by claiming the so-called “Anadonian Documents” were forgeries, these documents showed killing orders of Armenians but denialists denounce them as forged.

Well surprise surprise they are in reality, very much genuine.

And Talaat Pasha himself stated:

“Turkey is taking advantage of the war in order to thoroughly liquidate its internal foes, i.e., the indigenous Christians, without being thereby disturbed by foreign intervention. What on earth do you want? The question is settled. There are no more Armenians.” – Talat Pasha, in a conversation with Dr. Mordtmann of the German Embassy in June 1915

Denialists can’t deny that.

As well, in many areas all Christians regardless of ethnicity were just deported and massacred, which goes to show absolute genocidal intent.

“In some places, at Mardin for instance, all the Christians without distinction of race or faith have had the same fate.”

More reports from the American Ambassador in Constantinople:

Regarding the Muslim dead, (and it’s true there were many), the circumstances around them were different, explained well below.

“Most Muslim civilians died in WWI not at the hands of another ethnicity or government but from starvation. The Ottoman Empire conscripted hundreds of thousands of Muslim men and commandeered food items to feed the war effort. The villages where the men were needed to farm starved to death as men were away for years at a time. Similarly, Muslims fleeing the Russo-Turkish front died due to similar reasons after they were unable to return to their farms.

It’s true and important to acknowledge that the Russian army (and it’s 10–20% Armenian fighters Russia recruited from territory it conquered from Persia in the 1820’s) killed 160k-200k Muslim civilians from 1915–1918. But of the 2–3 million Muslim civilians (also includes Arabs) who died, most of it was due to disease and starvation. There were also a lot more Muslims living in the empire than Christians so number of deaths would be higher even if % percentage was lower.”

So claiming the large number of Muslims dead is due to “the Armenians killing them” is completely unfounded.

Finally “the Armenians have created a genocide industry” this is the only one that is somewhat accurate, but not in the negative, demeaning way it is used in.

The inventor of the word “genocide” specifically referred to the Armenians when using it!

Stating:

“I became interested in genocide because it happened so many times. It happened to the Armenians, and after the Armenians, Hitler took action.” – Raphael Lemkin.

So in conclusion, there is no way to logically deny the Armenian Genocide.

Thank you President Biden for recognizing the truth.

Alper Bilgin is a Georgian and Anatolian Greek activist for minority rights in Turkey and against Turkish propaganda and Turkification.

Pashinyan’s Resignation Sets Stage for Snap Elections

April 26, 2021



Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan announced his resignation in a prelude to snap parliamentary elections

YEREVAN (Azatutyun.am)–Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan formally announced on Sunday that he is resigning to pave the way for snap general elections aimed at ending the post-war political crisis in Armenia.

“In order to implement the decision to hold pre-term parliamentary elections on June 20, today I am resigning as prime minister of the Republic of Armenia,” he said in a televised address to the nation.

Under the Armenian constitution, fresh elections can be held only if the prime minister resigns and the parliament twice fails to elect another head of the government. The current National Assembly is controlled by Pashinyan’s political allies.

“The parliamentary majority will not elect a prime minister, the National Assembly will be deemed dissolved, and pre-term parliamentary elections will be called,” said Pashinyan. “During this [pre-election] period, I will continue to perform the prime minister’s duties on a full scale envisaged by Armenia’s constitution and laws.”

The prime minister, who swept to power in a 2018 “velvet revolution,” reaffirmed that he and his political team will seek reelection in the upcoming polls.

“If the people decide that I must quit the post of prime minister I will comply with that decision,” he said. “If the people decide that I must continue to serve as prime minister I will comply with that decision.”

Pashinyan first expressed readiness to hold early elections in December amid angry anti-government protests triggered by Armenia’s defeat in a six-week war with Azerbaijan stopped by a Russian-brokered ceasefire on November 10. A coalition of opposition forces blamed him for the defeat and demanded that he hand over power to an interim government.

Pashinyan and his My Step bloc stated on February 7 that they see no need for fresh elections because of what they called a lack of “public demand.” The opposition alliance, called the Homeland Salvation Movement, resumed its street protests on February 20.

Five days later, the Armenian military’s top brass issued a statement accusing Pashinyan’s government of misrule and incompetence and demanding its resignation. The prime minister rejected the demand as a coup attempt.

Pashinyan went on to announce on March 18 that the snap polls will take place after all. The move followed his talks held with the leaders of the two opposition parties represented in the current parliament. They are understood to have assured him that their parties will not nominate prime-ministerial candidates in the event of his tactical resignation.

Several other major opposition groups and figures, including former President Robert Kocharian, have also expressed their intention to enter the parliamentary race.

Angry Erdogan Calls on Biden to ‘Reverse’ Genocide Recognition

April 26, 2021



Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on a recent visit to the Armenian Patriarchate of Istanbul

Ankara Summons U.S. Ambassador to Turkey

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Monday denounced US President Joe Biden’s recognition of the Armenian genocide as “groundless” and harmful to bilateral relations, AFP reported.

“The US president has made comments that are groundless and unfair,” Erdogan said in televised remarks, warning that they could have a “destructive impact” on Turkish-US ties.

According to Reuters, Erdogan called on Biden to immediately reverse his declaration that 1915 massacres of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire constituted genocide, a move he said was upsetting and diminished bilateral ties.

Meanwhile on Saturday Turkey’s foreign ministry summoned the U.S. ambassador in Ankara to protest Biden’s recognition of the Armenian Genocide On Saturday.

Deputy Foreign Minister Sedat Onal met with David Satterfield late Saturday to express Ankara’s strong condemnation, the Associated Press reported.

“The statement does not have legal ground in terms of international law and has hurt the Turkish people, opening a wound that’s hard to fix in our relations,” the ministry said.

The Turkish Foreign Ministry was quick to “denounce and reject” Biden’s announcement, which it said was “made under pressure of radical Armenian circles and anti-Turkey groups.”

“The nature of the events of 1915 does not change according to the current political motives of the politicians or domestic political considerations. Such an attitude serves only a vulgar distortion of history,” said Turkey’s foreign ministry.

“After more than a hundred years of this past suffering, instead of exerting sincere efforts to completely heal the wounds of the past and build the future together in our region, the US President’s statement will not yield any results other than polarizing the nations and hindering peace and stability in our region,” added the foreign ministry, saying Biden’s announcement “will open a deep wound that undermines our mutual trust and friendship.”

“We call on the US President to correct this grave mistake, which serves no purpose other than to satisfy certain political circles and to support the efforts aiming to establish a practice of peaceful coexistence in the region, especially among the Turkish and Armenian nations, instead of serving the agenda of those circles that try to foment enmity from history,” added the statement.

On Sunday, Erdogan’s spokesperson Ibrahim Talin warned of severe “reactions” by Ankara to Biden’s announcement.

“There will be a reaction of different forms and kinds and degrees in the coming days and months,” Kalin told Reuters. “Everything that we conduct with the US will be under the spell of this very unfortunate statement,” he said.

Erdogan continued to deny the Armenian Genocide in a message sent to the Armenian Patriarch of Istanbul Sahak Mashalian on Saturday, saying Turkey is ready to enhance relations with Armenia “on the basis of good neighborhood and mutual respect.”

“I remember with respect the Ottoman Armenians, who lost their lives under the harsh conditions of the First World War, and offer my condolences to their grandchildren,” Erdogan said in the statement to Mashalian.

“We all are the members of the family of humanity regardless of our ethnic origin, religion, language or color. We have been living together in peace on these lands for centuries and feeling at peace under the shadow of our red crescent-star flag,” added Erdogan.

“I believe that building our identity solely upon the pains left by the past to our souls is also a grave injustice to new generations. It is time for us to lay bare that we as Turks and Armenians have reached the maturity of overcoming all obstacles together,” he added.

Azerbaijani press: US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken calls President Aliyev

Baku, Azerbaijan, April 29

Trend:

On April 28, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken made a phone call to President of the Republic of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev, Trend reports.

Touching upon the development of Azerbaijan-US bilateral relations, the US Secretary of State stressed the importance of further strengthening the ties. Noting the cooperation in the fields of energy security and regional security, Antony Blinken emphasized the significance of the successful implementation of the Southern Gas Corridor project, and also hailed Azerbaijan`s participation in the peacekeeping mission in Afghanistan.

Expressing gratitude for the telephone call, the head of state underlined that Azerbaijan-US relations have a rich history, and once again thanked the US government for supporting the implementation of the Southern Gas Corridor project. Touching upon the cooperation in the field of regional security, President Ilham Aliyev stressed the importance of Azerbaijan’s participation in the peacekeeping mission in Afghanistan from the initial stage.

During the conversation, the sides exchanged views on the situation after the Armenian-Azerbaijani war. President Ilham Aliyev affirmed Azerbaijan’s position on this issue, noting that restoration works are being carried out in the country`s territories destroyed by Armenians.

President Ilham Aliyev also noted the significance of opening communications in the region and stressed Azerbaijan’s position on ensuring long-term peace.

President Ilham Aliyev and the US Secretary of State also discussed the future activities of the OSCE Minsk Group.

During the phone conversation, the sides stressed the development of democratic processes, the importance of the ensuring of human rights, preservation and ensuring of the political pluralism in Azerbaijan.

Antony Blinken said this year too the waiver of Section 907 of the Freedom Support Act was extended.

President Ilham Aliyev extended his gratitude for this.

At the same time, regarding the US President`s recent statement on the so-called Armenian genocide, the Azerbaijani President said Turkey was Azerbaijan`s close friend and ally, which played a critical and positive role in the region in the post-conflict period, adding that the US President`s statement was met with concern by the Azerbaijani leadership and public.

Israel Faces Pressure to Follow U.S. Armenian Genocide Move Despite Turkey Ties

Newsweek
April 30 2021

BY TOM O’CONNOR ON 4/30/21 AT 1:46 PM EDT

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is facing mounting pressure to ignore protests by Turkey and follow U.S. President Joe Biden in declaring the mass killings of Armenians and other minority groups a century ago a genocide.

Biden’s historic genocide recognition made the United States the 30th country in the world to classify as such the ethnic cleansing that experts estimate killed a million Armenians and hundreds of thousands of other minorities, including Assyrians and Greeks, at the hands of the Ottoman Empire during World War I.

The decision immediately put the U.S. at odds with NATO ally Turkey, the modern successor to the Ottoman Empire. Ankara acknowledges that there were widespread killings amid clashes at the time, but denies that it was part of a systematic campaign that qualifies as genocide.

The move also put the spotlight on another U.S. ally in the Middle East, Israel. Despite the country’s intrinsic ties to the systematic massacre of more than six million Jews and other minorities in the Holocaust during World War II, Israel has not recognized an Armenian Genocide.

Today, it still stops short of doing so.

“The State of Israel recognizes the tragedy and terrible suffering of the Armenian people,” the Israeli Foreign Ministry said in a statement sent to Newsweek. “At this time in particular, it is our responsibility, and that of other countries in the world, to ensure that such events are not repeated.”

While Israel has extended its sympathy to those killed and displaced during the event, Netanyahu’s reluctance to take the next step has spurred calls for a new approach that more closely resembled that of the U.S., even from some of Israel’s most ardent supporters.

“While some U.S. leaders, most notably Barack Obama, talked about using the ‘g word’— genocide—in referring to the Armenian tragedy, in the end they all blinked when faced with Turkey’s intense pushback,” American Jewish Committee CEO David Harris said in a statement sent to Newsweek. “That’s what makes President Joe Biden’s decision, which the American Jewish Committee warmly welcomed, all the more significant. He didn’t compromise on truth for the sake of political expediency.”

AJC, an influential Jewish advocacy organization that predates even the mass killings and displacements in question, “has also encouraged Israel to consider the American step,” he said.

Harris said it should be done, even if it came at the cost of fueling further tensions with a powerful regional player.

“It’s not been an easy call for Jerusalem, since Ankara plays hardball, and has made it crystal clear that any such move could trigger a costly reaction affecting core Israeli interests,” he said. That’s far from easy to dismiss or sideline.”

“Nonetheless, as a country where the genocide against the Jews is seared into the national consciousness, can Israel afford to avoid recognizing the same Armenian reality?” Harris asked. “When values and interests collide for any country, the latter usually win out.”

“On this issue, in Israel’s case,” he added, “perhaps it will eventually produce a different result.”

Armenians carry national flags during a march to commemorate the anniversary of the 1915 massacre of Armenians by the Ottoman Empire during World War I, in Jerusalem, on April 23, ahead of President Joe Biden’s announcement. Israel has acknowledged atrocities committed against Armenians and other minorities at the time but has not declared it a “genocide” even as the United States now has.EMMANUEL DUNAND/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

Relations between Israel and Turkey today are already severely strained. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has often railed against Netanyahu, and has voiced consistent support for the right of return for Palestinians who themselves were forcefully displaced from lands also claimed by Israel during the country’s 1948 establishment.

But relations between the two countries haven’t always been hostile. Just a year after Israel came into existence, Turkey was the first majority-Muslim nation to recognize it. Ties between the two countries fluctuated with the tumultuous tides of Middle East politics throughout the following decades, but saw a marked improvement through the turn of the 21st century, with Turkey emerging as Israel’s closet regional partner.

But the relationship became strained as tensions in the Palestinian-controlled Gaza Strip erupted into a series of wars. Turkey condemned Israeli operations across the tiny coastal enclave. In one 2010 incident, 10 Turkish citizens—one of them a dual U.S.-Turkish citizen—were killed when Israeli troops raided a flotilla of civilian ships seeking to break the Israel-imposed blockade on Gaza.

Over the past decade, the situation has only worsened. In spite of sporadic attempts at reconciliation, the two powers find themselves on opposite ends of two camps locked in an emerging geopolitical contest in the Mediterranean region. Israel has recently shored up ties with Turkey’s historic rival Greece and more closely aligned itself with Egypt, France and the United Arab Emirates, while Turkey has sought to expand its footprint across lucrative maritime gas fields off the coast of Libya.

And while Israel has managed to make inroads across the Arab World over the past year with a set of deals that normalized ties with the UAE, Bahrain, Sudan and Morocco, the country remains deeply unpopular in the region. A study published last year by Qatar’s Doha Institute showed a mere 6% average of support for establishing diplomatic relations with Israel among 13 Arab populations polled.

Erdogan, on the other hand, has emerged as an important leader. He ranked ahead of Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in five countries surveyed by the polling project Arab Barometer: Algeria, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco and Tunisia.

In Libya, where Turkey has backed an internationally recognized government against an influential military leader supported by the Egypt-France-UAE bloc, Erdogan was seen as second to the Saudi royal in a tight race among the three leaders listed in the survey.

Only two Arab countries, Lebanon and Syria, have fully recognized an Armenian Genocide.

Turkey, meanwhile, continues to actively campaign against the use of the term, and has similarly beckoned Israel not to shift its stance.

“If there is one country in the whole world which understands the absolute need to refrain from politicizing the use of the term ‘genocide,’ it is probably Israel,” the Turkish embassy in Washington said in a statement sent to Newsweek. “Having suffered the horrors of Holocaust, Israel and Jews all around the world know too well that passing political judgments as such on historical events does neither serve the commemoration of the sufferings of the past nor help prevent the repeat of these crimes.”

“On the contrary,” the embassy added, “it undermines the weight and importance of the term “genocide” in disrespect of those who actually suffered from this appalling crime.”

Ankara argues the debate over what really happened remains ongoing.

“We cannot speak of the motives of the Israeli government, but it is only natural to think that they do not take it lightly the use of the term ‘genocide,'” the Turkish embassy said. “This should be particularly so given that none of the conditions required for the use of this term for the events of 1915 are met, including the lack of a decision by a competent international court.”

The embassy highlighted decisions adopted by the French Constitutional Council in 2012 and 2017 and by the European Court of Human Rights in 2015 and 2017, that “clearly established that events of 1915 constitute an issue of legitimate historical debate.”

The embassy also pointed out Turkey’s involvement in promoting Holocaust awareness, including by co-sponsoring the 2005 U.N. General Assembly resolution that established January 27 as International Holocaust Remembrance Day.

“As to Holocaust, on the other hand, safeguarding the memory of this horrific crime and protecting it from the shameful attacks of denialism and distortion is of utmost importance for us,” the embassy said.

The embassy also reiterated Turkey’s criticism of Biden’s decision last week, which it claimed did more harm than good.

“We hope that the entire international community continues to remember this dreadful chapter of the history of mankind with due respect and refrains from exploiting the term “genocide” for narrow political considerations, as President Biden did on April 24 this year,” the embassy said, “which only weakens the importance of this term and disrespects the memory of the millions of people who lost their lives as a result of the genocides perpetrated in Nazi Germany, Rwanda or Srebrenica.”

For Israel, there’s also the additional question of its growing ties with Azerbaijan, a close Turkish partner that fought against Armenia over contested territory last year in an explosive conflict that saw Baku employ Israeli drones that devastated Armenian forces, a campaign that Yerevan likened to a continuation of an Armenian Genocide. Azerbaijan, which neighbors both Turkey and top Israeli foe Iran, has proven a key partner for Israel in defense and energy.

Armenia rejects the position taken by Turkey and Azerbaijan, and argues that countries acknowledging the weight of past human rights abuses was key to preventing new violations on such a scale.

“Armenia condemns the denialistic policy which aims at justifying the Armenian Genocide and preparing grounds for new crimes against humanity,” the Armenian Foreign Ministry said in a statement sent to Newsweek. “The strong position of the international community on condemnation of genocides is an important prerequisite for truth and historical justice, as well as prevention of massive human rights violation.”

Andranik Israelyan, a Turkologist who formerly served in Armenia’s Foreign Affairs and Defense Ministries, provided insight into the Armenian perspective on Israeli hesitance.

“From the Armenian point of view it is very strange to see such a policy,” Israelyan told Newsweek. “An average Armenian is always perplexed why people who are victims of a genocide find it hard to acknowledge others’ tragedy.”

But he saw potential change on the horizon in Israel.

“My opinion is that Israeli recognition is an upcoming development, but will depend on its relationship with Turkey and Azerbaijan,” he said.

And major factors have come into play at home as well. As Netanyahu faces a new chorus of critics, Israelyan said there had been a “significant change in Israeli attitude to the issue.” He argued that “Israeli society is nowadays more inclined towards recognizing the Armenian genocide.”

To demonstrate this, Israelyan took note of the Israeli Knesset Committee on Education Culture and Sports decision in 2016 to recognize an Armenian Genocide. A number of nations have seen their legislatures take action on the issue and in some cases, like that of the U.S. Congress’ 2019 vote, it preceded eventual movement on the executive level.

Israeli President Reuven Rivlin was among the nation’s leading proponents for the move during his tenure as speaker of parliament, but he has avoided using the term “Armenian Genocide” since taking office in Netanyahu’s government in 2014.

Still, Netanyahu’s political opponents have continued to call for a new policy regarding Armenian Genocide recognition at a time of political deadlock in Israel.

One of Netanyahu’s top rivals, center-right Yesh Atid leader Yair Lepid, called Biden’s announcement “an important moral statement,” vowing to “continue to fight for Israeli recognition of the Armenian Genocide; it is our moral responsibility as the Jewish state.”

Left-wing Meretz Knesset member Tamar Zandberg said “the time has come for Israel to also clean itself of political interests and act for the most basic justice and recognize the Armenian genocide” and that “the Jewish state cannot lend a hand to attempts to erase history.”

Another leading opponent, center right-wing to right-wing New Hope head Gideon Sa’ar, has also expressed support for recognizing an Armenian Genocide in the past.

In Washington, the head of one leading institution raising awareness on systematic atrocities joined others in drawing parallels between the experiences of the Jewish and the Armenian peoples. U.S. National Holocaust Memorial Director Sara J. Bloomfield welcomed Biden’s move and emphasized the need for global recognition.
“Holocaust history teaches that an honest reckoning with the past is a prerequisite to understanding the present and building a better future,” Museum said in a statement sent to Newsweek.

The U.S. National Holocaust Memorial has also classified as genocides the mass killings against Tutsis in Rwanda in 1994, against Muslims in Bosnia and Herzegovina’s Srebrenica in 1995, against non-Arab minorities in Sudan’s Darfur in the early 2000s, against Yezidis in Islamic State militant group (ISIS)-controlled Iraq in 2014 and against the Muslim Rohingyas in Myanmar in 2017.

The museum pointed out that the Armenian experience is central to our current understanding of what defines genocide.

In the midst of the Holocaust in 1944, Polish-Jewish lawyer Raphael Lemkin drew upon the events that befell the Armenians and other communities in the Ottoman Empire when he coined the term “genocide.” The crime was first recognized as such under international law by the United Nations General Assembly in 1946.

As the international community continues to grapple with conflicting narratives 75 years later, Bloomfield urged countries across the world to come to terms with the past.

“Recognizing the full magnitude of the crimes committed against the Armenian people, even a century following the events, is important not only for the victims and their descendants,” she said. “We know from watching Europe deal with the Holocaust and its legacy since 1945, just how important it is for all societies to openly acknowledge difficult national history.”

Experts discuss Biden’s recognition of the Armenian genocide on the Ray Hanania Show

Arab News, Saudi Arabia


  • Expert guests on the Ray Hananina radio show welcomed the US president’s announcement and said it puts pressure on Turkey to accept its responsibilities
  • They said it will give other, smaller nations courage to ‘speak truth to power;’ but added that it must be backed up by policy, otherwise it is merely symbolic

Updated
RAY HANANIA

CHICAGO: Leaders and activists from the Armenian community in the US applauded the recent decision by President Joseph Biden to formally acknowledge the genocide of the Armenian people in 1915 by Ottoman Forces and said it adds to the pressure on Turkey to begin a process of reparations.

Biden made his announcement on April 24. On that date in 1915, he said, a genocide began during which an estimated 1.5 million people were “deported, massacred or marched to their deaths.”

Ani Tchaghlasian, a board member of the Armenian National Committee of America, said the killings were documented after the First World War by American and the German historians and government leaders. Biden’s decision puts Turkey on notice that it must accept its responsibility and face up to its obligation and make reparations to the descendants of the victims, she added.

“There are many countries that have already recognized the genocide: France, Germany — most of Western Europe, minus the United Kingdom,” Tchaghlasian said during a discussion on the Ray Hanania radio show on Wednesday.

“I think what this does is give other smaller players in the world courage to speak truth to power. All of this is only relevant once it becomes policy. The first step is to say the word and then to back up the word with policy.”

She said that the Turkish authorities, including President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, can no longer avoid the issue because genocide is a well-defined legal term and cases that involve it have the full power of the rule of law behind them.

“The (Turkish) state has an issue with it and that’s where the problem is. The state doesn’t want to embrace this, even though it is a part of their history, because it has legal consequences,” said Tchaghlasian, who is a descendant of genocide survivors.

She added that while she recognizes the fact that the Ottoman Empire carried out the genocide and not the Turkish Republic, “The issue is that successor states still have legal responsibility for their predecessors.

“Just because you change the name of your state, just because you elect a new body, like Germany did after the Second World War … that doesn’t mean the new government says, ‘Oh, I had nothing to do with this, so Germany bears no responsibility in the holocaust.’ That’s not how state responsibility works.”

During his speech at the White House this week, Biden said: “Beginning on April 24, 1915, with the arrest of Armenian intellectuals and community leaders in Constantinople by Ottoman authorities, one and a half million Armenians were deported, massacred, or marched to their deaths in a campaign of extermination.

“We honor the victims of the Meds Yeghern so that the horrors of what happened are never lost to history. And we remember so that we remain ever-vigilant against the corrosive influence of hate in all its forms.” Meds Yeghern, which translates as “great evil crime,” is the Armenian term for the genocide.

Journalist Lara Setrakian, the CEO and founder of News Deeply, said Biden’s announcement reflects his personal support of the Armenian community in its efforts to force Turkey to acknowledge the genocide. It opens the door for Armenians to gain additional international support for their attempts to get Turkish authorities to acknowledge the genocide and begin the process of reparations.

“It is an incredibly important statement from President Biden and the United States,” she said. “It’s not just a question of the moral authority or the weight of the American word. In this case, two countries had an up close, front seat (view) to what was happening during the Armenian genocide: the United States and Germany.”

The eyewitness accounts diplomats from the two nations, including Henry Morgenthau, the US ambassador to the Ottoman Empire, are primary source materials, she added.

“They saw this happening before their eyes. They interacted with the Ottoman officials who basically said straight up, ‘This is our strategy, we are getting rid of the Armenians,’” Setrakian said.

Germany has officially recognized the Armenian genocide and apologized for its role in it, she added, but the political successor to the Ottomans, the Turkish government, refuses and is “pretending that it did not happen.”

Tchaghlasian also believes that more countries will follow Biden’s lead and put greater pressure on Turkey to acknowledge the massacre and begin the process of reparations.

“We are glad that finally the time came,” she said. “The statement is very powerful. President Biden has a long history of being on the right side of this issue. It was time; the time has come.

“I think what is significant for the Armenian community is what comes next. I think having the declaration is very important; putting that word on paper is very important.

“But now we have to turn that into policy for the United States. Because putting the word on paper is only a word on paper and it needs to convert. We are pretty confident that the Biden administration will do that and will pursue that. But without converting that statement into policy, it really doesn’t have much teeth.”

The Ray Hanania Show is broadcast live every Wednesday in Detroit on WNZK AM 690 and in Washington DC on WDMV AM 700 on the US Arab Radio Network. The show is sponsored by Arab News and streamed live to millions of followers at Facebook.com/ArabNews.

Watch the video at the link below

Almost 5.7 million people contracted coronavirus worldwide in past week — WHO

Save

Share

 10:59,

YEREVAN, APRIL 28, ARMENPRESS. Almost 5.7 million novel coronavirus cases were registered worldwide in the past week, which is 8% more than during the previous seven-day period, the World Health Organization (WHO) said a weekly bulletin released in Geneva late on Tuesday, reports TASS.

Mortality grew by 5% in the reported period, with about 87,000 deaths registered worldwide, the global organization said.

“Globally, new COVID-19 cases increased for the ninth consecutive week, with nearly 5.7 million new cases reported in the last week – surpassing previous peaks. The number of new deaths increased for the sixth consecutive week, with over 87 000 new deaths reported”, the WHO said.

On April 19-25, the global organization was informed about 5,695,277 new cases all over the world, and 87,826 COVID-related deaths. As of April 25, 146,067,511 cases and 3,092,497 COVID-related fatalities were reported worldwide.

The most noticeable growth in cases (up 49%) was registered in Southeast Asia, which, according to the WHO classification also includes India. Cases declined by 12% in Europe, by 9% in Africa, by 8% in North and South America.

Mortality spiked in Southeast Asia (up 81%), Eastern Mediterranean (up 17%), but declined in Western Pacific (down 10%), North and South America (down 7%) and Europe (down 5%).

In the past seven days, over 1.46 million people contracted the infection in Europe, over 25,000 patients died. The number of cases in North and South America increased by over 1.4 million in the reported period, while fatalities grew by 36,000. In Southeast Asia, doctors registered over 2.26 million new cases of novel coronavirus, over 17,000 patients died.

India accounts for the majority of cases registered on April 19-25 (2.17 million new cases), followed by the United States (over 406,000), Brazil (over 404,000), Turkey (over 378,000), France (over 211,000), Argentina (over 166,000), Iran (over 161,000), Germany (over 145,000), Colombia (over 121,000), Italy (over 92,000), Ukraine (over 78,000), Poland (over 70,000), the Philippines (over 63,000) and Russia (over 60,000).

CivilNet: The Variants of Political Solutions for the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict. A Webinar

CIVILNET.AM

27 Apr, 2021 10:04

Throughout nearly three decades of the Nagorno-Karabakh peace process, negotiators discussed a number of possible solutions to the conflict, including various types of autonomy, federation, and even a land swap. No agreement was ever reached and the Second Karabakh War subsequently upended every dynamic in this conflict. On April 20, scholars convened to discuss the path forward. Kavus Abushov, Associate Professor of Political Science at ADA University, Philip Gamaghelyan, editor at Caucasus Edition and Assistant Professor at the University of San Diego, Asbed Kotchikian, advisory board member at Caucasus Edition and Associate Professor of Political Science at AUA, and Kamal Makili-Aliyev, LLD, Associate Professor of International Law and Human Rights at Malmö University and an affiliated researcher at the Raoul Wallenberg Institute of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, discussed the potential form and bases for the new stage of the peace process.

The panelists focused on the opportunities and challenges that Armenia and Azerbaijan face in the aftermath of the 2020 war. Philip Gamaghelyan stressed that the Second Karabakh War has exacerbated the deep enmity already existing among Armenian and Azerbaijani societies. Unlike in 1994, the current ceasefire did not result in the establishment of a robust negotiation process. Neither an official nor unofficial peace process currently exists. Further, Baku’s refusal to return PoWs coupled with provocative steps such as the inauguration of a Military Trophy Park contribute to hardening attitudes in Armenia with regards to dialogue with Azerbaijan and the possibility of reengaging in a peace process. This sentiment was echoed by Asbed Kotchikian, who noted that attitudes have indeed been hardening in both Armenia and Azerbaijan. According to Kotchikian, experts usually assume that the defeated side is more inclined towards nationalist rhetoric, but it is apparent that even the victors are quick to resort to a nationalist discourse.

Kamal Makili-Aliyev noted that the actions of the parties suggest that they consider the ceasefire agreement signed in November to be a normative treaty. According to the speaker, some aspects of the treaty have already been implemented, yet the implementations of others have slowed due to the lack of trust. Makili-Aliyev discussed the political crisis in Armenia and the absence of a unified political front as significant reasons for the slowdown. He mentioned: “Azerbaijan tying the return of the detained (ed. POWs) to Armenia’s withdrawal from territories controlled by Russia’s peacekeeping mission” and that both of these are included as obligations in the ceasefire agreement in paragraphs 4 and 7. He argued that the solution to these problems was likely to be political rather than legal.

Turning to the Russian peacekeeping presence in Nagorno Karabakh, the speakers view both as a challenge and an opportunity. Kavus Abushov stressed that the long-term presence of the Russian peacekeeping force makes renewed military escalation unlikely, creating a favorable atmosphere for negotiations and the resolution of the conflict, or at least an interim peace.

Asbed Kotchikian likewise stated that the Russian peacekeeping force could help secure a safe environment for people-to-people contact and confidence-building, considering that Armenians and Azerbaijanis will now have to live in proximity. At the same time, he noted that the involvement of Russian peacekeepers has brought new challenges to the region. Armenia lost its agency as an actor in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Possible future agreement on the fate of the region will be either bilateral, between Russia and Azerbaijan, or possibly trilateral, among Russia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey.

Discussing the possible variants of a solution, Gamaghelyan evaluated the trajectories that other ethno-national conflicts have taken. In Gamaghelyan’s view, the conflict currently follows the South Ossetian scenario, without an effective peace process between the parties, the enmity between people growing, and Nagorno Karabakh functioning as a de-facto Russian protectorate. This scenario has advantages: both freezing the conflict and saving lives in the immediate future. The downside, however, is that without direct engagement the conflict can become permanent and, with time, escalate. Unlike South Ossetia, however, the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict might draw in more than one outside actor, becoming a proxy war involving regional and global actors, a variation of a Syrian scenario.

Gamaghelyan argued that the parties’ preferred solutions- either Armenia’s preference for international recognition of the NKR as an independent state or Azerbaijan’s preference for complete control of the region- were unrealistic considering the involvement and position of Russia and other international actors. Pursuit of a unilateral solution would likely drive the region back to violence and increase the likelihood of the Syrian scenario.

According to Gamaghelyan, theoretically another possible but currently unlikely direction is a negotiated path towards autonomy. One modeled after either South Tyrol, a German speaking region within Italy, or the Aland islands, a de-facto independent Swedish-speaking region de-jure located within Finland. According to Gamaghelyan, the first scenario is difficult to achieve as they require a high level of democratization. Finally, the sides could proceed with the Cyprus scenario, grounded in an agreement to rule out violence and engage in long-term negotiations and a peacebuilding process without the expectation of finding a political solution in the near or medium-term future.

Referring to the potential variants outlined by Gamaghelyan, Abushov and Makili-Aliyev do not think the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict will follow the exact trajectory of any other particular conflict, but will instead follow its own path incorporating elements from a number of other political settlements. Makili-Aliyev suggested that the three pillars of the Aland Islands settlement could serve as the basis for negotiations: demilitarization; political autonomy; and respect of minority rights.

The conclusions drawn from the webinar were that substantial obstacles remain on the road to restarting an effective peace process. Among them, the absence of trust is the most significant.