Armenia to set up ferry between Georgia and Russia

Aug 16 2022
Nini Gabritchidze, Ani Mejlumyan Aug 16, 2022


Amid a sharp rise in exports to Russia, Armenia is working to establish a new Black Sea ferry service from Georgia to Russia, officials have said.

While the inspiration for the new service seems to have been long-standing problems with bottlenecks at the Georgia-Russia border, it has taken on new significance and scrutiny in light of the war in Ukraine and the resulting international sanctions against Russia.

Armenia’s Economy Ministry said the service, from Georgia’s port of Poti to Kavkaz in Russia, was supposed to start on June 15 but now should start operating in August. “The launch of the ferry service is postponed mainly because of the sanctions against Russia,” Economy Minister Vahan Kerobyan told Sputnik Armenia. He did not elaborate on the connection with the sanctions.

The Economy Ministry first mooted plans for a ferry service last year. An Armenian government decree of March 24, 2022, said that the Armenian logistics company C&M International would operate the ferry between Poti and Kavkaz twice a week. Kerobyan said the Armenian government will subsidize costs for fruit and vegetable exporters to use the ferry for the first six months of its operation.

Armenia is heavily reliant on Russia for trade, especially as a buyer of its agricultural products. The two countries don’t share a border, however, and overland traffic must go through Georgia. The road to the single border crossing between Georgia and Russia, Upper Lars, traverses a high pass in the Caucasus mountains and is vulnerable to weather-related closures.

“The average time for cargo transportation from Armenia to Russia [via Lars] is seven days, and it can be trimmed up to three days by the ferry,” the ministry told Sputnik Armenia on August 9.

Problems at the land border have been particularly acute this year.

Heavy rain in late June caused part of the highway on the Georgian side to wash away, forcing the road’s closure for several days. As a result, trucks exporting Armenian fruits and vegetables were stuck for days, just as the peak season was beginning, and much of the cargo spoiled.

“The biggest problems that the two countries [Armenia and Russia] face are connected with logistics,” Kerobyan said in a July interview with Russian news agency Tass. “There are huge lines at the Russia-Georgia border, more than a thousand Armenian trucks are standing there and it takes them 10 days to travel a distance that should take no more than five hours.”

Even before the road was closed, Georgian authorities and transport agencies were reporting significant increases in freight traffic along the road.

Meanwhile, Armenian trade with Russia has been sharply increasing. Armenian exports to Russia, its largest trade partner, grew 49 percent in the first half of 2022 compared with the same period last year. Imports grew 42 percent.

The big increase is likely due to an increase in re-exports to Russia via Armenia, economist Suren Parsyan told Eurasianet. “This year we have significant trade with Russia even with the problems at Lars in June and July,” he said.

Georgian exporters also have complained that Russian customs officials have been operating slowly, increasing wait times. “If 600 cars pass from [Georgia] per day, [Russia] manages about 300 of them,” Iva Chkhonia, the head of the Georgian Distributors Association, told Georgian news outlet Businesspressnews on May 21.

To deal with the delays, Georgian authorities came up with a solution in May to allow trucks loaded with perishable goods to skip ahead of other trucks, Businesspressnews reported.

Early in July, the Russian side reported opening 12 additional lanes on its side of the Lars border crossing, delivering on a promise to increase capacity at the border.

In Georgia, where the government has faced repeated questions from opposition politicians and media of possibly turning a blind eye to smuggling sanctioned goods to or from Russia, the long lines of foreign trucks at Lars have also led to political speculations. Georgian authorities have repeatedly denied the accusations, and Western diplomats in Tbilisi say they have seen no evidence that Georgia is helping Russia evade sanctions.

“All types of goods, including both military and dual-use as well as all those products that are on the sanctions lists of the countries participating in sanctions, are subject to strict customs controls,” the Revenue Service of the Georgian Finance Ministry said early in June in response to media speculations. 

After the news about Armenia’s soon-to-be-launched ferry route connecting Georgia with Russia started circulating in August, the Maritime Transport Agency in Georgia issued a statement on August 12 justifying Georgia’s cooperation with the project.

“The Georgian transit corridor continues to work in the overloaded mode,” the agency said. “Processing transit cargo is often delayed by several weeks, which in terms of perishable goods and food, as well as essential products, poses significant challenges to the Republic of Armenia.”

For these reasons, the agency said, Armenia approached Georgia to consider an alternative sea route to handle such goods. According to the statement, Georgia is also a party to an international convention (the Convention on Transit Trade of Land-locked States) providing free and equal sea access for land-locked countries.

The ferry will likely remain only a backup route given the increased cost, Parsyan said. “The ferry is just an alternative trade route,” he said. “Land will remain the most cost-effective route. The ferry could be only profitable or preferable if the land border is closed and the government subsidizes half of the cost in the long term.”

Ani Mejlumyan is a reporter based in Yerevan.

Nini Gabritchidze is a Tbilisi-based journalist.

 

Putin discusses Nagorno-Karabakh with Armenia’s Pashinyan – Kremlin

Aug 8 2022

Reuters Moscow

Russian President Vladimir Putin and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan discussed the situation in Nagorno-Karabakh and security issues on the Armenia-Azerbaijan border in a phone call on Monday, the Kremlin said in a statement.

The Kremlin last week called for restraint from both sides after Azerbaijan said its forces had foiled an Armenian attack near the enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh, which is part of Azerbaijan but is largely controlled by ethnic Armenians with support from Armenia.

(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

https://www.devdiscourse.com/article/law-order/2137614-putin-discusses-nagorno-karabakh-with-armenias-pashinyan—kremlin

ALSO READ
Putin discusses Nagorno-Karabakh with Armenia’s Pashinyan – Kremlin | National Post

Festival: Armenia’s Urvakan Festival Reveals First Acts For 2022 Edition

Aug 10 2022

aya and ZULI are among the artists playing the Dilijan event’s second edition this September


Armenian festival Urvakan has revealed the first wave of acts playing its 2022 event.

Returning for its second edition at the Armenian Composers’ Union Resort in Dilijan, the festival will go ahead for the first time since 2019. Among those billed to perform are aya, ZULI, Deena Abdelwahed, Jay Glass Dubs, Senyawa, Zoë Mc Pherson and Lara Sarkissian. Nicolás Jaar will also team up with Vincent de Belleval to present a performance titled Retaining The Energy, But Losing The Image.

Urvakan will take place from September 23 to 25, 2022. Find more information here.

Will Armenia and Azerbaijan’s Nagorno-Karabakh Clashes Lead to War?

The National Interest
Aug 4 2022

Deadly clashes have erupted in the Nagorno-Karabakh region over one year after the signing of a fragile Russian-brokered ceasefire agreement.

by Mark Episkopos

Deadly clashes have erupted in the Nagorno-Karabakh region over one year after the signing of a fragile Russian-brokered ceasefire agreement.

Azerbaijan said on Wednesday that its forces suppressed an Armenian attack near the enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh. Azerbaijan’s Defense Ministry accused Armenian forces of killing a soldier in an act of sabotage and attempting to seize territory controlled by Russian peacekeepers, according to Reuters. “We emphasize that the reason for the recent tension is the presence of illegal Armenian armed troops in the territories of Azerbaijan,” Baku claimed.

Armenia has rejected Baku’s framing of the clashes, with Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan claiming there are no Armenian servicemen in the Nagorno-Karabakh region. “Today, Azerbaijan is talking about the Nagorno-Karabakh Defense Army and the reasons why it is deployed along the line of disengagement. If Russia’s peacekeeping contingent and Azerbaijan provide guarantees of this line’s inviolability, the defense army, I believe, will not have to remain on combat duty. Also, I officially declare that there are no military servicemen from Armenia in Nagorno-Karabakh,” he said.

Pashinyan appeared to blame the recent spike in military tensions on a lack of action by Russian peacekeepers stationed in the broader Nagorno-Karabakh region. “Questions arise in Armenian society over the Russian peacekeeping operation in Nagorno-Karabakh,” he said during a government meeting, adding that the role of the Russian mission must be “clarified.” Armenia has accused the Azerbaijani side of violating the terms of a ceasefire agreement by attacking territories controlled by the peacekeepers. Yerevan officials have called on the international community to “stop the aggressive actions and attitude of Azerbaijan and to activate the necessary mechanisms to do so.”

Russia’s Defense Ministry has accused Azerbaijan of violating the ceasefire, adding that it is “taking measures to stabilize the situation” in consultation with Yerevan and Baku. “There are trilateral agreements, which serve as the starting point,” said Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov on Thursday. “The most important is to implement all obligations, which the parties assumed under these documents.”

The European Union, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, and the Biden administration have called for an immediate end to hostilities in Nagorno-Karabakh. “The United States is deeply concerned by and closely following reports of intensive fighting around Nagorno-Karabakh, including casualties and the loss of life,” said U.S. Department of State spokesperson Ned Price. “We urge immediate steps to reduce tensions and avoid further escalation,” he added.

Azerbaijan’s armed forces launched an offensive to retake the ethnically Armenian breakaway enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh, internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan, in the Summer of 2020. The six-week Nagorno-Karabakh war ended with a Kremlin-brokered ceasefire agreement involving the restoration of several surrounding territories under Azerbaijani control and the deployment of some 2,000 Russian peacekeeping forces to the region.

Mark Episkopos is a national security reporter for the National Interest.


"Pretext for escalation": Pashinyan on Baku’s actions and intentions


Aug 5 2022



  • JAMnews
  • Yerevan

Pashinyan on the escalation in Nagorno-Karabakh

On August 4, the Prime Minister of Armenia expressed his opinion on what is behind the escalation in Nagorno-Karabakh. Nikol Pashinyan believes that Azerbaijan is trying to eliminate mechanisms laid down in the tripartite statement of November 9, which put an end to the 2020 Karabakh war. Above all, the goal is to replace the Lachin corridor — the road connecting Armenia with NK.

The escalation in Nagorno-Karabakh began on August 1. On August 3, the Azerbaijani Armed Forces were using grenade launchers and drones. As a result, two Armenian soldiers were killed, nineteen were injured, four of whom are in serious condition.

The Armenian prime minister presented details regarding the construction of a new road to replace the Lachin corridor and expressed his opinion on the actions and possible intentions of Azerbaijan. He talked about the mandate of the Russian peacekeepers stationed in NK, responsible for ensuring the security of the region, in order to clarify “the essence of the peacekeeping mission.”

The main points of the Prime Minister of Armenia’s speech.


  • Renewed tension in Nagorno-Karabakh: Yerevan and Baku report
  • Shelling in Karabakh and gunfire at the Armenian-Azerbaijani border. What’s happening? Opinions from Yerevan
  • Bombshell interview with Azerbaijani expert: “The threat of war is clear.”

According to the Armenian prime minister, the tripartite statement, which was also signed by the President of Azerbaijan, fixes three realities:

  • the existence of the Nagorno-Karabakh territorial entity,
  • presence of a line of contact, and
  • the Lachin corridor, which provides passage between Armenia and NK

Pashinyan believes that Azerbaijan is now trying to eliminate these stipulations by resorting to military escalation:

“Azerbaijan, which considered the statement of November 9 its own victory, intends to scrap this statement and avoid the facts recorded there.”

The prime minister declared these facts to be “vital security conditions of Nagorno-Karabakh”:

“Azerbaijan’s current struggle is against these three conditions. We expect that, as stipulated in the tripartite statement, the Russian peacekeeping forces will not give Azerbaijan the opportunity to undermine these fundamental conditions.”

Pashinyan recalled that since Ilham Aliyev himself also signed the document, “for Azerbaijan, these conditions are an international obligation.”

Secretary of the Security Council of Armenia makes a statement regarding the withdrawal of the Armenian Armed Forces from Nagorno-Karabakh.

The prime minister said that at present there is no approved plan for the construction of a new road through the Lachin corridor. According to the tripartite statement of 2020, the signatories (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Russia) must approve a plan within the next three years.

“At the moment we have not agreed to any plan, because we have not been offered a draft. Under any plan it is necessary to clarify a number of important issues, including those related to the supply of electricity and gas to Nagorno-Karabakh, and anything related to security,” Pashinyan said.

Pashinyan considers statements out of Baku “a gross violation of the tripartite statement of November 9.” According to him, Baku is using the issue of a new route to replace the Lachin corridor as a “pretext for escalation.”

He believes it no coincidence that Baku went on the offensive in NK just as Armenia has begun construction of the Kornidzor-Tekh-M12 highway. This highway, “presumably, should connect to the new route of the Lachin corridor.”

Meeting of Foreign Ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan in Tbilisi – Yerevan and Baku continue to discuss the meeting of Mirzoyan and Bayramov

Pashinyan believes that the presence and activities of Russian peacekeeping forces in NK is a key factor in ensuring the security of the Armenians living there. Yet, he says, there are “questions about the purpose and essence of the peacekeeping operation.”

Nikol Pashinyan recalled events that have taken place in Nagorno-Karabakh since November 2020, when Russian peacekeepers arrived in the area:

  • on December 11, 2020, the capture by Azerbaijan of the villages of Khtsaberd and Khin Tager and the capture of Armenian soldiers “in the presence and with the connivance of Russian peacekeepers”;
  • on March 24, 2022, the capture of the village of Parukh in Nagorno-Karabakh “again in the presence of Russian peacekeepers”;
  • ongoing and intensifying violations of the ceasefire along the line of contact

“Instances of physical and psychological intimidation of Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh in the presence of peacekeepers are simply unacceptable,” Pashinyan concluded.

According to the prime minister, it is necessary to clarify the details of the fulfillment of the peacekeeping mission in Nagorno-Karabakh.

He states this was needful from the very beginning, but “Azerbaijan interfered with this process by refusing to sign the mandate of the peacekeeping force in Nagorno-Karabakh.”

“In our opinion, the signatures of Armenia and Russia are sufficient for the fulfillment of this mandate. And if not, then it is necessary to take measures to establish this mandate at the international level or give the peacekeepers a broader international mandate.”

Pashinyan pointed out that peacekeepers are deployed along the line of contact, and this territory has been declared “the area of responsibility of the Russian peacekeeping forces in Nagorno-Karabakh.”

In Pashinyan’s view, Armenia expects that

  • any attempt to cross the line of contact in Nagorno-Karabakh will be prevented by Russian peacekeeping forces,
  • those Azerbaijani units that have crossed the line of contact and are inside the zone of responsibility of the peacekeepers will be ejected

Why has Azerbaijan decided to build a several-kilometer long Murovdag tunnel in Kalbajar region which will bypass Nagorno-Karabakh?

The prime minister also mentioned Azerbaijan’s criticism that Armenia has pledged to ensure passage between Azerbaijan and Nakhichevan, but has not fulfilled this pledge.

“We are ready to provide this on any day, but it’s Azerbaijan that does not take advantage of the opportunities we give. Even today we say: ‘Come, cross the border of the Republic of Armenia in accordance with the procedure established by the legislation of the Republic of Armenia’,” Pashinyan said.

He said that since last year, border checkpoints have been operating at several sections of the border. According to him, Azerbaijanis can cross the border, passing through passport and customs control:

“Azerbaijan can cross the Armenian border at several points and pass through to Nakhichevan. We guarantee the safety of this movement. And not only in the Gazakh-Ijevan section, but also in Vardenis, Sisian, Yeraskh, Goris.”

Pashinyan states that Azerbaijan has still not tried to take advantage of this opportunity.

Speaking of new roads, Pashinyan stressed that, according to the trilateral statement, they should be built with the consent of all parties. According to the prime minister, Armenia considers “the discussion of the routes of these roads secondary,” while the main thing is to determine and use legal procedures.

During his speech, Pashinyan stressed several times that on all points of the agreements of November 9, 2020, “Armenia is pursuing a policy of constructive negotiations in the name of establishing and strengthening peace in the region.”


Artsakh’s state minister chairs cultural heritage council meeting

Panorama
Armenia – July 29 2022

Artsakh’s State Minister Artak Beglaryan on Thursday chaired the second meeting of the State Council for the Protection of Cultural Heritage in Occupied Territories of the Artsakh Republic.

Beglaryan praised the fact-finding activities carried out in a brief period following the formation of the council and discussed the upcoming activities with the council members, his office reported.

The list of collections of museums and exhibition halls fallen in the territories occupied by Azerbaijan was confirmed.

An interested discussion was held regarding the implementation of various research and information activities.

Council: We must actively discuss option to separate Karabakh issue from Armenian-Azerbaijani relations

NEWS.am
Armenia –

The Karabakh issue is not a territorial issue for us. In that sense, the security and the rights of Karabakh Armenians are of fundamental importance for us, Armen Grigoryan, Secretary of Armenian Security Council, told Armenpress.

Armen Grigoryan particularly referred to the statements of the Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan. In particular, in one of his speeches in the National Assembly, Prime Minister Pashinyan proposed to separate the Nagorno-Karabakh issue from Armenian-Azerbaijani relations.

“Now we should actively discuss this option and decide how to proceed,” Grigoryan said.

Estimates have recently been heard from geopolitical centers that there is a serious possibility of normalizing Armenian-Azerbaijani relations and thus establishing long-term peace and stability in the region. Does the Armenian government see such an opportunity?

The fact that the Armenian government has announced a peace agenda as a state strategy and policy is a direct indication that we see such an opportunity. This possibility becomes even more substantive when we consider that the Armenian government, the political majority, takes responsibility for the implementation of the peace agenda, while understanding that it is not an easy path. I think that the commitment of the Armenian government and political majority to the peace agenda is an important factor for the assessments voiced from various international platforms.

What roadmap do you see for the implementation of the peace agenda?

The agenda is well known: the works on the delimitation and security of the border with Azerbaijan, which have already started, and the second meeting of the Commission on Border Delimitation and Security is scheduled for the second half of August in Moscow, the opening of regional communications…

Azerbaijan claims that Armenia is dragging its feet on these issues.

 A meeting of the Commission on Border Delimitation and Security was scheduled for the second half of August at the suggestion of the Azerbaijani side. The Armenian side was ready for the second meeting both in June and July. We have repeatedly expressed our willingness to open regional communications. 

Recently there was a package of proposals that we passed through diplomatic channels in December 2021, and it is still in force today. We have made a number of other proposals and are very interested in opening up regional communications, which is part of the Armenian Crossroads project. Of course, the issue of the specific route of the east-west section of the project can be discussed, we have never insisted on just one option, and we need to find the most efficient route, because the functionality and attractiveness of the Armenian Crossroads project depends on it.

In the trilateral working group on communications, which is co-chaired by the deputy prime ministers of Russia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan, we are noticing some progress and are ready to continue in the same spirit.

Does peace with Azerbaijan consist of these two steps? What will happen to the status of Karabakh?

No, the culmination of the road map and peace agenda you mentioned is, of course, the signing of a peace treaty with Azerbaijan. You know that Azerbaijan presented five points on this, and the Republic of Armenia said that there was nothing unacceptable in them.

Including the recognition of the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan? That is, does Armenia recognize the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan and has no territorial claims?

 Armenia recognizes the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan at least because it is part of our legislation. We have repeatedly said that Armenia and Azerbaijan recognized each other’s territorial integrity and inviolability of borders by the agreement on the formation of the CIS, signed and subsequently ratified in 1991. And today this document is part of the legislation of both Armenia and Azerbaijan. This needs to be expressed at the bilateral level as well. And as we said, there is nothing unacceptable for us in this perspective, and Armenia, yes, has no territorial claims against Azerbaijan.

And Karabakh, what about the issue and the status of Karabakh?

We have repeatedly said that the Karabakh issue is not a territorial issue for us. In this sense, the security and rights of Karabakh Armenians are of fundamental importance to us. In one of his speeches in the National Assembly, Prime Minister Pashinyan said that there is an idea to separate the Nagorno-Karabakh issue from the Armenian-Azerbaijani relations. Now we have to actively discuss this option and decide how to proceed.

That is, to sign a peace agreement with Azerbaijan without a final solution to the Nagorno-Karabakh issue?

 There is such an idea. But at this point it’s too early to talk about any such formula.

And what security guarantees should there be for the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh?

There is an international guarantee for the security of the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh – the presence of peacekeeping forces of the Russian Federation. We need to work to further improve this guarantee, but the demilitarization of the Nagorno-Karabakh issue is an important idea.

By and large, is Armenia ready to sign a peace treaty with Azerbaijan?

By and large I think we are moving in that direction.

And the return of the prisoners, finding out the fate of the missing.

The solution of humanitarian issues is a necessary concomitant element of the peace agenda. This includes the question of preserving cultural heritage. All of these issues need to be resolved, of course. By the way, over the past two years Armenia handed over to Azerbaijan 130 bodies of Azerbaijanis missing in the first Karabakh war. We are ready to actively cooperate in this issue too and expect the same from Azerbaijan. On the Armenian side there are over 770 people missing since the first Karabakh war. The number of our missing in the 44-day war is 203.

The day before, the Ministry of Territorial Administration and Infrastructure reported that the reconstruction of the M12/-Tegh-Kornidzor road is scheduled to begin in August. Is this a new route of the Lachin corridor? And when will construction be completed?

Yes. The construction will be completed within the timeframe of the November 9, 2020 trilateral statement.

And how do you assess the prospects for Armenian-Turkish relations?

The special representatives of the two countries have reached specific agreements, namely on the opening of the border for the citizens of third countries and on the start of air transportation between the two countries. In their telephone conversation on July 11 the Prime Minister of Armenia and the President of Turkey agreed to implement those agreements and to take further steps. It is unequivocal that we will adhere to these agreements, especially as Russia, the United States, France, Iran, Georgia and the EU support the process of normalization of the Armenian-Turkish relations.

Chess: Olympics: Armenian women’s team win 4:0

NEWS.am
Armenia –

In the first round of the World Chess Olympiad, which started in Chennai, India, the Armenian women’s team competed against Botswana and won 4-0.

Elina Danielian (2441), Anna Sargsyan (2378), Mariam Mkrtchyan (2285) and Susanna Gaboyan (2270) played for the Armenian team under the guidance of Zaven Andriasian.

The team also include Lilit Mkrtchian (2362), who is ranked second.

The Armenian women’s team rank ninth with an average rating of 2367.

A Slice of Home: D.C.’s Premier Armenian Café and Market, Yerevan

Yerevan market and café

In the heart of the Adams Morgan neighborhood in Washington, D.C. lies a café and market called Yerevan. An area deprived of our cuisine, Yerevan, teeming with life, is a staple for the Armenian community in D.C. and beyond. 

As a Los Angeles native, I have grown accustomed to my Armenian bubble: seeing storefronts written in Armenian, being greeted in our language unprompted, smelling a variety of pastries from an Armenian bakery on every corner…the list goes on. Now, I’m spending the summer on the east coast, where even the concept of “Armenia” — let alone “Armenian food” — is foreign. There are restaurants that are reminiscent of home, as D.C. has its fair share of Mediterranean food. However, it was not quite what I was looking for. So, I decided to dig deep and ask people around me where I can find a slice of home. I received the same response from anyone I asked: “You have to go to Yerevan.” 

You can imagine my relief when I stepped through the doors of Yerevan. The smell of soorj (coffee) and gata (cake) greeted me with a smile as did owner Stella Grigoryan, who invited me into the space with the proverbial Armenian hospitality that we all know and love, and even went further to ask, “Would you like a coffee? How do you take it?” 

Grigoryan and her husband are not restaurateurs by trade. In fact, Yerevan is the couple’s first time running a café. The two moved to D.C. from Yerevan in 2012 and were – like me – shocked at the lack of Armenian cuisine in the area. 

“We realized that there weren’t any Armenian cafés in the area,” says Grigoryan. “We wanted to change that. To my knowledge, we are the first ones.” 

Inside Yerevan market and café

The space is warm and cozy with Armenian art and pictures adorning the walls. There is also a “market” section, where customers are able to purchase Armenian goods straight from the source: Armenia. They offer various items, ranging from wines and juices to fruit preserves and books. The menu is stacked with favorites, including lahmajunzhingyalov hatskhachapuri and kufta. If you have more of a sweet tooth, you won’t be disappointed with the baklava and mikado. The café’s best offering is their Armenian coffee, prepared authentically with finely ground coffee beans in the traditional Armenian coffee pot, the jezveh

Zhingyalov hats from Yerevan market and café

“A lot of non-Armenians love coming to Yerevan,” remarks Grigoryan. “They appreciate our culture and cuisine and are interested in finding out more about the Armenian people.” 

The beauty of the space is that it connects Armenians to their culture. Beyond that, it introduces the intricacies of our cuisine to non-Armenians. Coming to Yerevan during my stay n the east coast was truly a highlight of my trip. Creating spaces for Armenians to sit around a table, eat their traditional foods, drink their traditional drinks and engage in thoughtful conversations is important; it drives us forward. We have a deep connection to our food. It is a way of preserving the essence of who we are…regardless of how far from the motherland we may be. 

Armenian pastries from Yerevan market and café

Melody Seraydarian is a writer from Los Angeles, California. She is an active member of the AYF Hollywood “Musa Ler” Chapter. Melody also interns for the Armenian Bar Association and volunteers for various political causes and campaigns, while working on other writing and design projects.


Drug smuggling from Turkey to Armenia prevented

Public Radio of Armenia

Employees of the anti-smuggling department of the State Revenue Committee have detected and prevented an illegal import of various types of medicines not registered in Armenia at Zvartnots Airport.

Unregistered medicines and empty medicine boxes with Latin letters were found in the luggage of two Armenian nationals arriving from Turkey.

Oncological drugs were found in the inner pockets of their jackets.