Armenian Nuclear Power Plant re-connected to grid after major repair

Save

Share

 12:20,

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 18, ARMENPRESS. After a 141-day planned preventive repair the Armenian Nuclear Power Plant has been re-launched and re-connected to the power grid.

Over 600 specialists from Armenia, Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, Croatia, Czech Republic, Slovakia and elsewhere took part in the repair work, the NPP operator said.

The repair will contribute to extending the lifecycle of the 2nd power unit, as well as the increase of the safety level.

The crew also conducted the planned annual repair works.



$50 million to be invested into Armenian economy

Save

Share

 14:29,

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 18, ARMENPRESS. The “Entrepreneur + State Anti-Crisis Investments Fund” managed by ANIF’s subsidiary, will invest USD 4 million in the EU-Armenia SME Fund (hereinafter: the Fund) supported by the European Bank for Reconstruction & Development (EBRD) and the European Union and managed by Amber Capital Armenia. The committed capital of the Fund will hence reach the target size of USD 50million, which will be invested directly into the Armenian economy. The goal is to make equity investments in private companies operating in the Republic of Armenia to support business expansion plans.

FMO ,the Dutch entrepreneurial development bank, has also committed USD 7 mln to the Fund. FMO invests in the fund to support building the PE industry in Armenia, which in turn will help to make financing available for SMEs and facilitate the creation of jobs (SDG8).

CEO of ANIF, David Papazian, said: “Today there are almost no alternative business financing tools in Armenia, such as private equity funds. Our subscription is of strategic importance, as it takes place along a subscription by a strategic European investor such as FMO. The investment is especially valuable for ANIF taken into account the contribution to the development of the Armenian economy, as well as its capital markets”.

Managing Partner of Amber Capital Armenia Anush Simonyan said: “We would like to thank ANIF for this investment. We believe it reflects the trust in the EU Armenia SME Fund, and lays foundation for a long-term mutually beneficial partnership between Amber Capital and ANIF.”

Russia sends 10 tons of humanitarian to Artsakh

Save

Share

 16:23,

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 18, ARMENPRESS. Russia has delivered 10 tons of humanitarian aid for the residents of Artsakh (Nagorno Karabakh), the Russian defense ministry said in a statement.

The humanitarian aid has been collected by charity organizations.

The cargo will be transported to Stepanakert. The humanitarian aid includes food, baby toys, stationery, as well as equipment for the educational institutions of the border communities of Artsakh.

“The goods will be provided to kindergartens, schools, large families, those who have lost loved ones, the people in need and the families of internally displaced”, representative of the Russian peacekeeping troops Dmitry Tusidi said.

 

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

RFE/RL Armenian Report – 10/18/2021

                                        Monday, 
Armenian Opposition Buoyed By Local Election Results
        • Naira Nalbandian
Armenia - Residents of Gyumri vote in a local election, .
Representatives of Armenia’s two leading opposition groups emphasized on Monday 
the significance of the ruling Civil Contract party’s failure to win weekend 
local elections in Gyumri and two other major communities.
The party led by Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian had won most votes in the same 
urban communities encompassing the country’s second largest city and three towns 
in Syunik province in the general elections held as recently as in June.
Artur Khachatrian, a lawmaker representing the main opposition Hayastan bloc, 
claimed that the outcome of the local polls held there on Sunday testifies to a 
major drop in Pashinian’s approval rating.
“People’s lives are not getting better,” he told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service. “On 
top of that, there is the most important thing: national security 
considerations.”
Khachatrian said at the same time that Civil Contract lost in Gyumri, Goris, 
Meghri and Agarak and nearby villages also because Pashinian did not personally 
campaign in the local races. “The ruling political force is completely dependent 
on Pashinian’s popularity,” he said.
Hayk Mamijanian of the opposition Pativ Unem bloc similarly asserted that the 
lack of negative campaigning by Pashinian this time around had a significant 
impact on the election results.
“Experience shows that when the ruling team does not spread that propaganda of 
hatred -- ‘vote for us, or else that guy will return to power’ -- they conduct 
an extremely useless and toothless election campaign because they have no 
substantive message [to voters,]” claimed Mamijanian.
He predicted similar outcomes of local elections that will be held in many more 
communities later this year.
Neither Pashinian nor his party officially reacted to the election setbacks as 
of Monday evening. But Khachatur Sukiasian, a parliament deputy representing the 
party, downplayed their implications for national politics.
Sukiasian said that many voters have different motives when casting ballots in 
national and local elections. He also suggested that Civil Contract may have 
picked wrong mayoral candidates for the latest polls.
Fugitive Armenian Statesman Dies
Armenia - Former Interior Minister Vano Siradeghian.
Vano Siradeghian, a once powerful Armenian politician and former government 
member, has died at the age of 74 more than two decades after fleeing the 
country to avoid prosecution on murder charges denied by him.
Siradeghian’s death was announced by his wife and son in a short statement 
issued at the weekend. They did not specify its cause, reveal his last place of 
residence or say whether they want to bury him in Armenia.
A former novelist, Siradeghian was one of the leaders of a popular movement for 
Armenia’s unification with Nagorno-Karabakh that erupted in 1988 and toppled the 
then Soviet republic’s last Communist government in 1990. He became one of the 
newly independent country’s most powerful men when serving as interior minister 
in the administration of its first President Levon Ter-Petrosian from 1992-1996.
Both during and after his tenure, Ter-Petrosian’s political opponents and some 
media outlets accused Siradeghian of abusing his powers to enrich himself and 
his family. He denied that.
One year after Ter-Petrosian resigned in 1998, Siradeghian was charged with 
ordering a string of contract killings. State prosecutors claimed in particular 
that he set up in the early 1990s a death squad to eliminate and terrorize 
opponents of the Ter-Petrosian administration.
In July 2000, two members of the alleged gang were sentenced to death while 
seven others got jail terms ranging from 4 to 11 years. One month later, eleven 
former officers of Armenian interior troops were given lengthy sentences after a 
Yerevan court convicted them of murdering two men in 1995.
The former interior minister strongly denied ordering those killings. He and his 
supporters insisted that the charges were fabricated as part of then President 
Robert Kocharian’s efforts to neutralize his political foes.
Siradeghian fled Armenia in April 2000 ahead of the Armenian parliament’s 
decision to allow law-enforcement authorities to arrest him pending the outcome 
of his trial. Although the authorities for years claimed to be trying to track 
him down and have him extradited, his whereabouts always remained unknown to the 
public.
Throughout his exile Siradeghian never went on record to comment on political 
developments in the country. He continued to enjoy the backing of Ter-Petrosian 
and members of the ex-president’s entourage.
In a weekend statement, Ter-Petrosian’s Armenian National Congress (HAK) party, 
paid tribute to Siradeghian, saying that as interior minister he managed to 
quickly “root out crime” and maintain “internal stability and law and order” and 
thus contributed to the Armenian victory in the 1991-1994 war in 
Nagorno-Karabakh.
The HAK also deplored the “trumped-up” charges brought against him during 
Kocharian’s rule and urged the current Armenian authorities to allow 
Siradeghian’s family to bury him at the National Pantheon in Yerevan.
Armenia’s Ruling Party Suffers Setbacks In Local Elections
        • Artak Khulian
        • Satenik Kaghzvantsian
Armenia - Mayor Arush Arushanian visits a newly repaired sports school in Goris, 
June 5, 2021.
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian’s Civil Contract party failed to unseat the 
jailed opposition-linked mayor of a major community in Armenia’s Syunik province 
and was also defeated in Gyumri in local elections held on Sunday.
Voters also went to the polls in seven other communities across the country. In 
most of them, they elected, on a party-list basis, local councils that will in 
turn appoint their mayors.
The most tense and closely watched race was in the Syunik town of Goris and 
several surrounding villages making up a single administrative unit. Its 
incumbent mayor, Arush Arushanian, was arrested in July on a string of criminal 
charges rejected by him as politically motivated. Arushanian’s two deputies were 
detained in August but were subsequently set free.
Arushanian, who has headed the community since 2017, has not been convicted of 
any crimes so far and was therefore allowed to run for reelection. The 
30-year-old is affiliated with the main opposition Hayastan alliance led by 
former President Robert Kocharian. But he chose to cobble together a smaller 
bloc for the local election.
Preliminary election results showed the bloc bearing Arushanian’s name winning 
62 percent of the vote, compared with about 36 percent polled by Civil Contract. 
The ruling party’s mayoral candidate, Vladimir Abunts, effectively conceded 
defeat.
“I didn’t expect such an outcome because during the election campaign we were 
convinced that we are going to win,” Abunts told journalists late in the evening.
Armenia - Police raid the election campaign headquarters of the opposition Arush 
Arushanian Bloc in Goris, 
Sunday’s voting was marked by mutual accusations of foul play and heightened 
police presence in Goris condemned by the Arush Arushanian Bloc as a government 
attempt to intimidate its supporters.
Special police forces sent from Yerevan also raided the bloc’s campaign 
headquarters and searched it for several hours. A lawyer for the bloc said they 
suspect the incumbent mayor’s father and campaign manager, Gagik Arushanian, of 
buying votes. He rejected the allegations.
Over two dozen Arushanian loyalists, who gathered in the office after the 
closure of polls, burst with joy when Menua Hovsepian, a deputy mayor of Goris 
released from jail last week, announced the preliminary vote results.
“The people of Goris have spoken up [in favor of] dignity, Syunik and the 
country,” said Hovsepian.
The new Goris council will almost certainly reelect Arushanian as community 
head. It remains to be seen whether Armenian courts will agree to free him 
pending the outcome of his anticipated trial.
Syunik borders districts southwest of Nagorno-Karabakh that were retaken by 
Azerbaijan during and shortly after the six-week war stopped by a 
Russian-brokered ceasefire last November. The mayors of virtually all provincial 
towns and villages blamed Pashinian for Armenia’s defeat and demanded his 
resignation. Some of them encouraged supporters to disrupt Pashinian’s visits to 
Syunik.
Most Syunik mayors joined Kocharian’s bloc in the run-up to the snap 
parliamentary elections won by Civil Contract. Three of them were arrested 
shortly after the snap polls.
One of those mayors, Mkhitar Zakarian, ran another major community comprising 
the towns of Meghri and Agarak and several villages. Pashinian’s party was 
defeated there on Sunday by the Hanrapetutyun party, a pro-Western group which 
is nominally in opposition to the Armenian government but supports it on some 
issues.
Armenia -- Gyumri Mayor Samvel Balasanian speaks with journalists, April 24, 
2018.
The ruling party prevailed in two other, smaller and rural Syunik communities. 
But it suffered another serious setback in Gyumri.
Armenia’s second largest city has been run by Samvel Balasanian, a local 
businessman, for the last nine years. He was allied to the former Armenian 
government that helped him win reelection in 2016.
Although Balasanian decided not to seek another term in office, a newly created 
party bearing his name has joined the mayoral race. Its list of election 
candidates was topped by one of the outgoing mayor’s relatives, Vardges Sanosian.
The Balasanian Bloc won 36.6 percent of the vote in the weekend election marked 
by a record-lower voter turnout of just over 24 percent. Civil Contract finished 
second with about 30 percent. Three other political forces, including former 
President Serzh Sarkisian’s Republican Party, fared much worse while managing to 
clear the 4 percent threshold for being represented in the municipal council.
It was not immediately clear if the Balasanian Bloc will seek a power-sharing 
deal with Pashinian’s party or the other opposition groups to install Gyumri’s 
next mayor.
Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2021 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
 

CivilNet: Hadrut: Was it possible to prevent the fall?

CIVILNET.AM

19 Oct, 2021 09:10

On the one year anniversary of the fall of Hadrut during the Second Karabakh War, CivilNet Artsakh correspondent Hayk Ghazaryan spoke with the city’s Mayor, Vahan Savadyan, in Stepanakert. An excerpt from that conversation has been translated into English. 

Background

The city of Hadrut is located within the boundaries of the Hadrut region in the southern part of Karabakh. The region is one part of the Nagorno Karabakh Autonomous Oblast (NKAO) that is currently under Azerbaijani control. Although the city fell in October of 2020, the rest of the region was captured by Azerbaijani Armed Forces in December 2020, weeks after the signing of the November 10 Russia-brokered ceasefire agreement. 

Hayk Ghazaryan (CivilNet): On which day exactly did Hadrut fall?

Mayor Vahan Savadyan: I would that it is not so important. On October 10, [2020], at around 11, AM the enemy entered Hadrut. After that day’s battles, we came out wounded. And on October 11, another group went to Hadrut, to the administration building, composed of the head of the administration, the head of the Hadrut National Security Service, and a number of citizens and servicemen. By then, the southern part of Hadrut, on the other side of the river, was already under the complete control of the enemy. They remained in Hardut for about an hour but it was impossible to resist because the enemy had stationed large numbers of troops in the area.

It was not possible to take any action with such a small group. Of course, they tried, but it wasn’t possible. The boys were wounded and had to leave. Some seven or eight people from that group were from our region. Others were from the special detachments of the National Security Services. There were other servicemen as well. I cannot specify their exact number since I was not there. I was injured on October 10. But there were about 30-40 of them.

Hayk Ghazaryan (CivilNet): If a proper defense was organized, do you think it would have been possible to defend Hadrut, or would the adversary have broken them eventually?

Mayor Vahan Savadyan: Of course, it would have been possible. Anyone who has been to Hadrut before October 10 will agree with me that it was possible to defend the city if the defense was organized properly. But no organization took place. For example, our boys, the head of the National Security Service, the head of the administration, his deputy․․․ There were many people who tried to organize and defend Hadrut. But it was not enough. The army should have immediately․․․ It is after all the 21st century. It’s not 1991. We shouldn’t have had to organize detachments with each of us attempting to organize something in one direction or another. This was a serious war. We had to prepare rigorously, which we did not do.

Hayk Ghazaryan (CivilNet): Why didn’t anyone announce the fall of Hadrut? Why were we deceiving ourselves?

Mayor Vahan Savadyan: Meaning, to announce on the 10th or 11th of October that Hadrut had really fallen?

Hayk Ghazaryan (CivilNet): On the 14th or 15th at least․․․

Mayor Vahan Savadyan: To be honest, there was such chaos that I wasn’t following the news. In general, I didn’t follow the news during this war, because I didn’t have that opportunity. Yes, people would call and inform [us] of various news. I didn’t know who was saying what. Who was lying or not. I was injured on October 10 and was moved to Yerevan. I returned two days later to the villages of Hadrut. There was no one there, there was no media to approach and ask me that question. No one asked about the situation in Hadrut, whether it was in our control or in [Azerbaijani control].

Hayk Ghazaryan (CivilNet): How many people from Hadrut currently live in Artsakh and in Armenia? How many people had to migrate?

Mayor Vahan Savadyan I can give approximate data because I do not have specific information from the region. So, 30-35% of [Hadrut city’s] population currently lives in Artsakh – in Stepanakert, in Martakert, in different communities. The same percentage applies to the Hadrut region. The rest settled in different parts of Armenia. Unfortunately, some of them went abroad. Specifically, 200 people went abroad from the city of Hadrut. And this is ongoing. And roughly 1000 people went abroad from the whole region. We hear news of this every day․ What can people do?

Hayk Ghazaryan (CivilNet): What programs are being implemented in Artsakh to house the people from Hadrut? Do most of them live in hotels?

Mayor Vahan Savadyan: Yes, they live in hotels or they rent. The rents are expensive. The state, of course, does not provide that much, people try to make ends meet themselves. As for building housing… Yes, it is one problem to provide housing, and another problem to provide employment. Providing an apartment is not a complete solution to the problem. What will that person do? We can say that there is no agriculture, we do not have that much land, there is a lack of pastures and arable land. What should these people do? This is the most serious question. Before the housing construction works are completed, they will have to be given employment opportunities. Starting today.

Translation by Zara Poghosyan

Armenpress: 2nd Army Corps in charge of protecting Armenia’s eastern border ready to fulfill any objective, says deputy commander

2nd Army Corps in charge of protecting Armenia’s eastern border ready to fulfill any objective, says deputy commander

Save

Share

 15:16,

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 16, ARMENPRESS. The situation at the eastern border of Armenia is peaceful and stable at the moment, and the recent military escalation in the Artsakh-Azerbaijan line of contact where an Azeri attack left 6 Armenian troops wounded did not impact the stability of the Armenia-Azerbaijan state border, Deputy Commander of the 2nd Army Corps of the Armenian Armed Forces Colonel Hayk Petrosyan told reporters at a military post.

Colonel Petrosyan, who is in charge of the military morale of the 2nd Army Corps, stressed that his troops are a combat-ready formation capable of fulfilling any military objective. He said that any adversary provocation will receive adequate assessment from the Armenian military.

“We are now located in one of the military positions of the army corps protection area where border protection is conducted. The combat position is being equipped, it’s already in the final phase, there are observation posts, firing positions where on-duty troops are observing the adversary’s movement with the purpose of assessing and controlling the nature of its potential actions,” Colonel Petrosyan said.

He said that the latest provocation against their positions took place on July 28, when Azerbaijani servicemen attacked a military position near Vardenis, but were repelled.

Nevertheless, he added, despite the post-war military-political situation and significant changes of the line of contact the Azerbaijani military’s conduct hasn’t changed.

“The adversary is the same adversary,” he said. “The 2nd Army Corps, which is deployed at this border, is a combat-ready formation capable of fulfilling any objective. This was proven during the military actions of the 44-day war. Particularly now the army corps is capable of neutralizing any adversary provocation,” the colonel said.

“As a seasoned military expert I can assure you that the adversary is evaluating the military formations and military bases which stand in front of it. If the adversary were to think that they could fulfill some kind of an objective they will definitely go for it. We are not allowing this, we will thwart it with relevant actions,” the colonel said.

Photos by Hayk Manukyan

Reporting by Aram Sargsyan

Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan




Armenia vs Azerbaijan: Hearings at the UN International Court of Justice


Oct 17 2021


    JAMnews

For two days in a row, on October 14-15, the UN International Court of Justice considered the demand for the application of urgent measures in the Armenia vs Azerbaijan lawsuit. Yerevan presented a demand that, prior to the consideration of the main claim, Azerbaijan should release the Armenian prisoners of war and held civilians, close the trophy park in Baku, stop inciting hatred and facts of vandalism against the Armenian historical and cultural heritage.

Armenia filed a lawsuit against Azerbaijan to the UN International Court of Justice for violation of six articles of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination on September 16. The plaintiff states that “Azerbaijan has subjected Armenians to racial discrimination for decades. During this time, the Armenians were subjected to systemic discrimination, massacres, torture and other humiliations”.

Azerbaijan stated that it would “resolutely defend itself” and submitted a counterclaim to the Hague Court.

The interests of Armenia in the UN International Court of Justice are represented by lawyer Yeghishe Kirakosyan. He is the representative of Armenia at the European Court of Human Rights. A group of international experts will protect the country’s interests. They have already presented to the Hague Court the main provisions of the urgent action requirements.

Accusations and demands of the Armenian side refuted by the Azerbaijani side.

Armenia filed a lawsuit against Azerbaijan at the International Court of Justice for violation of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination

Lawyers representing Armenia claim that the lawsuit contains ample evidence of torture and humiliation of the dignity of Armenian prisoners in Azerbaijan.

One of the members of the expert group, Sean Murphy, said in court that even after the end of the second Karabakh war, Azerbaijan continues to keep Armenian prisoners of war. He pointed out that Azerbaijan was obliged to return them both in accordance with international humanitarian norms and in accordance with a tripartite statement signed by President Aliyev in the fall of 2020.

The expert on international law assessed the failure to fulfill obligations to return the prisoners as “a manifestation of ethnic discrimination”.

Sean Murphy emphasized that the Armenian side provided the court with facts both about 45 prisoners, the content of which Azerbaijan confirms, and a full evidence base about those whose detention is not recognized.

He recalled that the Azerbaijani special forces captured Armenian soldiers in December last year near the villages of Khin Tager and Khtsaberd, although, according to a trilateral statement, “the Armenian side had no obligation to leave these two villages”.

The speaker presented to the judges evidence of torture of Armenian prisoners in Baku, spoke about publications proving that prisoners of war and held civilians were burned and tortured with electricity.

The lawyer presented to the court the video recordings of the murders and ill-treatment of Armenian prisoners. Some of them were disseminated on social networks by the servicemen of the Azerbaijani Armed Forces themselves.

“Today you can hear that all these prisoners of war are criminals, and their detention has nothing to do with ethnic cleansing [talks about the Azerbaijani objections expected after the statements of the Armenian side – JAMnews], while the facts testify specifically to ethnic cleansing.” , – said the expert.

Lawyers representing the interests of Armenia stressed that Azerbaijan is destroying Armenian cultural and religious monuments.

International law expert and legal adviser Pierre D’Arzhan, in particular, focused on the shelling of the Kazanchetsots cathedral during the 44-day war – twice a day:

“Armenians cannot feel safe in Nagorno-Karabakh, including in places sacred to them.”

According to the lawyer, although President Aliyev declared in September from the UN rostrum that Azerbaijan is a country of tolerance and peaceful coexistence for different peoples, the facts indicate the opposite:

“These facts show the real face of the ruling regime in Azerbaijan, a policy full of hatred, which is contrary to the convention.”

Another member of the expert group, Konstantinos Salonidis, stressed that the propaganda of hatred in Azerbaijan is carried out at the highest level and continues after the war. According to him, to be convinced of this, it is enough to listen to the speeches of President Aliyev.

The lawyer recalled the trophy park that opened in Baku in April 2021, where dummies of Armenian soldiers humiliating their dignity were displayed next to military equipment captured by the Azerbaijani side during the war.


  • Armenia’s Security Council Secretary: There will be no exchange of territories with Azerbaijan
  • Foreign Ministers of Azerbaijan, Armenia and Russia discuss Karabakh conflict

According to Yeghishe Kirakosyan, representing the interests of Armenia in the International Court of Justice, the group of lawyers managed to present the country’s position in the best way – with weighty facts, arguments and an impeccable evidence base.

“We are confident in the validity of all our demands and expect a fair decision,” Yeghishe Kirakosyan said.

Speaking at the Hague Court, he said that the Armenians were subjected to terrible ordeals, including genocide and massacres:

“The armed conflict, which, as President Aliyev himself openly acknowledged, started Azerbaijan in September 2020, is the latest link in this chain of ethnic violence and hatred. We fear that this will continue until the root causes of this conflict are eliminated. ”

According to the court hearing procedure, Azerbaijan presented its counterarguments. The speaker from the Azerbaijani side, Peter Goldsmith, expressed the opinion that Armenia’s demands should be rejected, since “Azerbaijan has fulfilled its obligations under the trilateral statement”:

“There are a limited number of Armenians in Azerbaijan who are accused or convicted of grave crimes.”

Azerbaijani representative in this case, Elnur Mammadov, denied accusations of racial discrimination, stating that the arguments of the Armenian side are incorrect.

He stated that the court should reject the claim of Armenia, and quoted the words of Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev that “ensuring ethnic and cultural diversity, cultural compatibility is one of the priorities of Azerbaijan’s policy.”

Elnur Mammadov also assured that some exhibits were removed from the territory of the trophy park. Moreover, he told the court that official Baku had launched an investigation and indicted those Azerbaijani servicemen who are suspected of committing crimes against Armenians during the 44-day war.

The court in The Hague has completed preliminary hearings on the claim of the Armenian side. On October 18-19, hearings will be held on the claim of the Azerbaijani side, after which the UN International Court of Justice will sum up the results.

The decision of the Hague court on the application of an urgent measure on the claim of Armenia, lawyers are expected not earlier than in a month. Consideration of the main claim will take place later.


Improved reporting of violence against women and domestic violence cases by Armenian journalists

Council of Europe
Oct 14 2021
YEREVAN 16-18/09/2021

Journalists representing different regional TV channels, online and print media of Armenia discussed the principles of media reporting on the topics of violence against women and domestic violence in a three-day online training seminar. The seminar addressed how media can help raise awareness about violence against women and domestic violence, the sensitive techniques of interviewing victims/survivors of violence, the use of background information and statistics to present violence against women as a societal problem rather than as an individual personal tragedy, facts and reality vs. myths and stereotypes, the existing national legislation, policies and practices, as well as the international instruments, such as the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (the Istanbul Convention).

“Coverage of this topic, in-depth analysis of the causes of violence require a sensitive approach, proper awareness raising of the legal framework and facts. Therefore, the media are our strong partners in promoting gender equality and preventing violence against women,” highlighted Sophie Bostanchyan, Head of the Human Trafficking and Women Issues Department, Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs of Armenia.

“I find the training extremely useful, now I know how to better conduct investigations related to cases of violence against women and domestic violence, where to take and how to correctly use the background information and statistics.”, said Armenak Davtyan, a reporter from “Aravot” daily newspaper and “Radiolur” Public Radio programme from Syunik region.

The training was organised within the framework of the Council of Europe project “Path towards Armenia’s ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence” in partnership with the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs of Armenia.

Azerbaijani, Iranian top diplomats try to turn down heat

EurasiaNet.org
Oct 14 2021
Joshua Kucera Oct 14, 2021
Trucks travel along a slice of Azerbaijani territory on the road that connects Iran with Armenia. (photo: Joshua Kucera)

The foreign ministers of Iran and Azerbaijan have spoken in an apparent attempt to decrease the temperature on the tensions that have erupted between the two sides in recent weeks.

Azerbaijan’s Jeyhun Bayramov spoke with his Iranian counterpart Hossein Amir-Abdollahian by phone on October 13. The readouts from both sides referred to the heated mutual accusations that Baku and Tehran have been hurling at the other and expressed a willingness to move beyond them.

“The two countries must prevent misunderstandings in their relations,” the Iranian Foreign Ministry said in its statement following the call. “Tehran and Baku have enemies and the two sides should not give the enemies the opportunity to disrupt relations between the two countries and concerns should be resolved through dialogue and cooperation.”

The Azerbaijani statement echoed that sentiment (minus the reference to “enemies”): “The sides noted the harmful rhetoric observed recently, which does not correspond to the level of friendly relations between our countries, and the need to resolve all differences through dialogue.”

The diplomatic outreach followed weeks of unprecedentedly hostile rhetoric between the two neighbors, as well as large-scale Iranian military exercises held on Azerbaijan’s border.

While the real cause of the vitriol remains unclear, the spark was the Azerbaijani authorities’ arrest in September of two Iranian truck drivers on a section of the main road through southern Armenia that passes through some slices of Azerbaijani territory.

Following the October 13 conversation, Iran announced that two Iranian prisoners currently held in Azerbaijan would be extradited to their home country, and some media mistakenly reported that the prisoners were the two truck drivers.

Both Bayramov and Amir-Abdollahian did mention the transit issue, though, suggesting the two sides were working on a way to resolve it.

As a result of Azerbaijan’s victory in the war last year over Armenia, it regained control of most of its territory along Armenia’s border that it had lost in the first war between the two sides in the 1990s. That included some slices of land through which the main road through Armenia passes. That road is the main artery between Armenia and Iran, and Iranian trucks use it to supply Armenia as well as – occasionally and controversially – Karabakh.

The two Iranian drivers arrested were reportedly shipping cargo to Karabakh, and while Azerbaijan’s customs service denied that they had been released, as they did so they made public some new information about the drivers, including their names and the crimes they have been charged with.

According to a statement from the customs service, the two drivers, Barzegar Haghi Jafar Ghazanfar and Norouzi Shahroud Heidar, were arrested for “smuggling” goods into Karabakh, crossing Azerbaijan’s border without permission and outside an official border crossing. (Karabakh is internationally recognized as Azerbaijani territory, and Baku takes a hard line on entries into the territory via Armenia.)

A criminal case has been launched and an investigation is underway, the customs service said: “Reports that they [Ghazanfar and Heidar] have been returned to their home country do not reflect the truth.”

The conversation between Bayramov and Amir-Abdollahian apparently touched on how to avoid these sorts of incidents in the future.

“Amir-Abdollahian … said Tehran expects that the problem of transit traffic of Iranian trucks in the Azerbaijan Republic will be solved,” the Iranian statement read. The Iranian side also said that Bayramov “suggested that the two countries’ customs officials hold talks to solve the problem of the transit of Iranian goods” and “stressed the pursuit of the release of two Iranian truck drivers detained in the Azerbaijan Republic,” though the Azerbaijani statement did not go as far on either of those points.

“It was decided to discuss issues related to transit transportation through the Republic of Azerbaijan by the way of direct contacts between relevant government agencies,” the Azerbaijani statement read.

Iran has already expressed its willingness to help Armenia construct a new road through southern Armenia into Iran that would avoid Azerbaijani territory.

In an October 13 interview with the Italian newspaper La Repubblica, Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev also touched on the Iranian transit issue. Aliyev reiterated earlier statements in which he described repeated demands to Tehran to do something about the Iranian trucks going to Karabakh.

“Please, pay attention to this illegal business activity in Karabakh by Iranian businessmen,” Aliyev said Azerbaijan had told Iran. “We were not in a position to accuse [the] Iranian government. We understood that it’s some private companies who do it. But we asked to stop it. What happened in return, everybody sees.”

 

Joshua Kucera is the Turkey/Caucasus editor at Eurasianet, and author of .

Garo Paylan, 3 other opposition MPs may be stripped of immunity

Panorama, Armenia
Oct 14 2021

A bill to strip ethnic Armenian MP Garo Paylan from the pro-Kurdish Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP) and three other opposition lawmakers has been submitted to the Grand National Assembly of Turkey, Ermenihaber reports.

The bill has been drafted by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s office.

Two of the MPs are also from the HDP, and one represents the Democratic Regions Party (DBP).