Importante accionista este tras aeropuerto de Turquia; Eurnekian…

La República (Uruguay)
4 Junio 2005

Importante accionista está tras aeropuerto de Turquía;
Eurnekian tras aeropuerto de Turquía

La nueva empresa que dirigirá el Aeropuerto Ataturk ( Estambul,
Turquía ) con terminales de vuelos Internacionales y domésticos, será
determinada por una oferta prevista para el próximo 10 de junio.

La empresa que proporcione la oferta más alta ganará el arriendo de
las terminales del aeropuerto internacional por el período de 15,5
años. Corporación América SA, se presentará a la licitación. Esta
empresa es dirigida por Eduardo Eurnekian, principal accionista de
Aeropuertos Argentina 2000 que opera 32 aeropuertos en Argentina, uno
en Ecuador, el aeropuerto de Yerevan en Armenia y el recientemente
renovado aeropuerto de Carrasco en Uruguay.

First Deputy FM Russia and EU Special Rep. In South Caucasus Discuss

FIRST DEPUTY FM RUSSIA AND EU SPECIAL REP. IN SOUTH
CAUCASUS DISCUSS NAGORNO KARABAKH, GEORGIAN-OSSETIC AND
GEORGIAN-ABKHAZIAN CONFLICTS

YEREVAN, JUNE 4. ARMINFO. First Deputy Foreign Minister of Russia
Valeriy Lochinin and EU Special Representative in the South Caucasus
Heikki Talvitie have discussed Nagorno Karabakh, Georgian-Ossetic
and Georgian-Abkhazian conflicts.

According to the web-site of the Russian Foreign Ministry, the sides
exchanged opinions on the situation in the region, the process of the
above conflicts’ resolution. They pointed out the parties’ adherence to
further development of cooperation with the states of the Transcaucasus
and peaceful political settlement, the source reports.

Reason to worry; Turkey and the EU

The Economist
June 4, 2005
U.S. Edition

Reason to worry; Turkey and the EU

ankara

Fallout for Turkey from the no votes in France and the Netherlands

The country with most to lose from the EU referendums may be Turkey

WHAT do the French and Dutch rejections of the European Union
constitution imply for Turkey’s hopes of joining? If one believes the
country’s political leaders, nothing. “This result has nothing to do
with Turkey’s candidacy, we will continue on our path with the same
enthusiasm,” the Turkish prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, told
parliament this week. His rhetoric was echoed by EU officials. And in
theory they are right.

The constitution makes no reference to Turkey’s membership. In France
(as in some other anti-Turkey countries, notably Austria) voters have
been promised the chance to stop Turkey joining in a separate
referendum on further enlargement, when the time comes. Moreover,
last December’s decision by EU leaders to promise Turkey the start of
membership talks on October 3rd was a political one that can be
changed only by consensus of all 25 EU members. Some optimists even
venture to suggest that the defeat of the constitution could pave the
way for a looser EU that it would be easier for Turkey to fit into.

Yet the reality is more worrying for Turkey. The French and Dutch
noes may be “the EU’s internal problem”, as Mr Erdogan claims. But
they also reflect growing hostility around Europe to further
enlargement of the EU-and, specifically, to the idea of taking in
poor, big and Muslim Turkey. There is also a good chance that
Germany’s opposition Christian Democrats (CDU) will win the election
expected in September. The CDU leader, Angela Merkel, is firmly
opposed to Turkey’s membership and has lobbied instead for a
“privileged partnership” that has been roundly rejected by the Turks.
Her hostility to full membership for Turkey is shared by France’s
Nicolas Sarkozy, a would-be presidential candidate in 2007.

Against this gloomy background, the wisest course for Turkey,
according to the EU ambassador to Ankara, Hansjorg Kretschmer, is to
ignore the ructions in Europe and focus on implementing the sweeping
reforms that earned it the precious October date for talks. In one
hopeful sign, Mr Erdogan last week appointed Ali Babacan, his young
and pragmatic economy minister, to head the EU negotiations. Turkey
is also about to sign a protocol extending its customs union with the
EU to the ten new members that joined last year, including Cyprus.

This week a long-delayed new penal code came into effect. But despite
such radical provisions as making marital rape a crime, the code also
contains several controversial articles-for example one that allows
long prison terms for journalists who attack the Turkish military
presence in northern Cyprus or describe as “genocide” the mass
slaughter of Armenians during the first world war.

There are, indeed, disturbing signs that Mr Erdogan may be pandering
to a recent upsurge in nationalism that is being fanned both by
anti-Turkish sentiment in Europe and by the country’s hawkish
generals, whose power may be eroded by EU reforms. Besides continued
police harassment of Christians and other minorities, last month an
appeal court in Ankara upheld the banning of Turkey’s biggest
teachers’ union because it had said that the country’s 14m Kurds
should be able to educate their children in their mother tongue.
Turkish academics had to cancel a conference to debate the Armenian
tragedy after the justice minister, Cemil Cicek, accused them of
“knifing Turkey in the back”.

Mr Cicek’s outburst, concluded one senior EU diplomat, was
“confirmation that the government no longer believes in the EU
process.” That view may be exaggerated, but there is disillusion with
the EU among Mr Erdogan’s conservative base. One example is perceived
European indifference to restrictions on the Islamic headscarf. It
was surely with his conservative base in mind that Mr Erdogan last
week introduced legislation to reduce penalties for those who run
underground courses to teach the Koran. The move brought renewed
charges from Turkey’s fierce secularists that Mr Erdogan’s real
intention is to move the country closer to an Islamic theocracy, and
not to the EU. Turkey’s many enemies in Europe would surely take
pleasure in that.

GRAPHIC: Euro-anxiety in the markets?

‘RA government dooms thousands of pensioners to hunger’

AZG Armenian Daily #102, 04/06/2005

Concern

‘RA GOVERNMENT DOOMS THOUSANDS OF PENSIONERS TO HUNGER’

Accumulation of Signatures against Social Cards

RA Government had doomed to hunger thousands of pensioners. This
statement was made by the Armenian Constitutional Law Enforcement
Center on June 2.The government doesn’t deprive them of the right
to receive pensions, but they don’t pay it, as the pensioners have
no social cards. According to the data, submitted by RA Social
Security Minister, 600 thousand Armenian citizens refused to take
social cards. Gevorg Manukian, Head of ACLE, applied to RA National
Assembly for permission to apply to RA Constitutional Court to define
the law on Social cards. The appeal was signed by 30 deputies of RA
Parliament. They failed to accumulate the required 44 signatures. The
representatives of ACLE submitted a bill on making amendments to the
abovementioned law, accumulating 70 signatures given by the lectors of
ARF Dashnaktsutiun and Republican Party of Armenia. ACLE is determined
to organize a large-scale accumulation of signatures. The members of
the center are sure that they will gather thousands of signatures,
as the law was forced to the people. They believe that this action
will turn into an unofficial referendum for the law on social cards
and RA citizens will vote “against” that.

By Nana Petrosian

The activity of Armenia will be evaluated in another closed….

THE ACTIVITY OF ARMENIA WILL BE EVALUATED IN ANOTHER CLOSED EUROPEAN SESSION

A1plus

| 18:11:33 | 03-06-2005 | Official |

On 3 June, Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian received the GRECO
monitoring commission headed by Mr. Carlo Chiaramonte, a member of
the GRECO Secretariat.

Minister highly valued the work of the commission and noted that
Armenia seriously understands the need to take necessary steps to
make the fight against corruption more effective.

During the last five days, the GRECO delegation had met with officials
and specialists responsible for the fight against corruption, through
legislative reforms and other steps. During the next six months, the
commission will draft a report with conclusions and recommendations for
steps to be taken in Armenia to overcome this obstacle to democratic
and economic development.

Part of heavy artillary in Akhalkalaki will be transported to Giyumr

AZG Armenian Daily #100, 02/06/2005

Region

PART OF HEAVY ARTILLERY IN AKHALKALAKI WILL BE TRANSPORTED TO GYUMRI

Russia and Georgia Decide, Armenia Plays an ‘Outpost’

Georgian foreign minister did not exclude that part of military equipment in
Russian 62d base of Akhalkalaki will be transported to Armenia. “We did
everything possible to convey the major part of the equipment to Russia. But
we do not exclude that part of the equipment will be distributed in the
territory of Armenia where necessary infrastructures exist”, Novosti agency
quoted minister Salome Zurabishvili as saying. Earlier the foreign minister
told BBC about the possibility of ammunition transportation to Armenia
adding that Armenia is no threat for Georgia.

On May 30, Russian and Georgian foreign ministers signed a joint statement
of withdrawing the 12th base of Batumi and the 62d of Akhalkalaki by the
year 2008. The sides agreed on starting the removal this year. The base of
Akhalkalaki is first to be removed. 40 unites of armored vehicles, including
20 tanks, will get out of Akhalkalaki by September of the current year. By
the end of 2006 there will remain no heavy artillery in Akhalkalaki, and the
base will eventually close in October 1 of 2007.

Russian-Georgian agreement came for many as a surprised. Georgian President
hailed the event as “historic”. The joint statement points out that “the
bases will stop functioning to their purpose” from May 30.

Russian Commersant wrote that the equipment of Batumi base will head for its
new destination via sea and the ammunition of Akhalkalaki base will be
transported to Gyumri on “trailers”. On May 23 President Vladimir Putin
said, according to Interfax, “We have to create necessary conditions for the
withdrawal of our forces be it to Russia or any other place”.

Under “other place” Putin obviously meant Armenia. Earlier on May 19 head of
Russia’s armed forces Yuri Baluyevski said that part of the heavy artillery
of Georgia’s Russian bases will settle in Armenia. While in Yerevan Dmitri
Medvedev, chief of Russian President’s administration, answered a question
concerning the transportation of Russian military equipment to Armenia,
“That’s a complex issue, one that needs first to be discussed by Russia and
Georgia. But there are aspects that we would like to discuss with other
neighbors as well”.

This statement by Medvedev cannot but be viewed as offensive for a sovereign
state as Armenia. It turns out that Russia, preparing to convey its military
equipment, precisely rusty weapons of Soviet times, considers it first of
all an issue for Moscow and Tbilisi to discuss. Medvedev’s “other neighbors”
is undoubtedly a hint at Azerbaijan, which raises an alarm that Moscow keeps
on arming aggressor Armenia.

Meanwhile official Yerevan keeps silent about the issue of conveying Russian
equipment from Georgia to Gyumri. In this situation either Russia follows
its own wishes while using Armenia’s territory for its military aims, or
Armenia greets stationing of old Russian equipment in its territory. The
first variant seems more possible. Cooperation with Russia is certainly one
of the primary elements of Armenia’s safety. But Moscow visibly misuses the
reality called Armenian-Russian strategic cooperation.

By Tatoul Hakobian

BEIRUT: Three Syrian officers “running” election campaign in north –

Three Syrian officers “running” election campaign in north – Lebanese paper

Al-Mustaqbal web site, Beirut
31 May 05

Text of unattributed report entitled “Three Syrian security officers
running election battle in the north” published on Lebanese newspaper
Al-Mustaqbal website on 31 May, subheadings as published

In the wake of the big victory achieved by the lists of the martyr
Prime Minister Rafiq al-Hariri in the three constituencies in the
capital and amid public welcome of the success of the lists of national
partnership, which Sa’d al-Hariri described as “solidarity by the
people of the capital with 14 March”, several election developments
took place yesterday in a number of constituencies in the districts,
foremost of which is the information on three Syrian security officers
working shifts in the north to run the election battle against the
opposition.

First, Gen Michel Awn has continued to attack the election results
in the capital, saying that “the petrodollar has swept Beirut” and
referring to “a kind of serious factional control over the country”.
He said that “the citizen in Beirut does not act spontaneously and
is guided”. He also announced that the “mourning period (over prime
minister Al-Hariri) is over”. The interesting thing is that Awn,
who attacked what he described as the “guided citizen” in Beirut,
addressed a delegation from the Kisrawan-Jubayl constituency and
told them: “Follow us and we will handle the responsibility of (…)
[ellipsis as received] I will show you the way and if you want to
take that road, you will rid yourselves and Lebanon (…)” [sentence
as published] He also attacked the “petrodollar in Kisrawan-Jubayl”.
It was also interesting that there was convergence between Awn and
[former] Prime Minister Salim al-Huss, who said that “the results were
settled in advance”, adding that the “poor turnout raises questions
about their legitimacy”. He also “observed” that “the factors which
decided the result are religious and sectarian bias, political money
and the emotional reaction to the heinous crime”.

Secondly, Awn continued with the alliances with the symbols of the
era of Syrian custodianship. After he settled the alliance with MP
Talal Arsalan in the B’abda-Aley constituency, Al-Mustaqbal learned
that progress had been made in the negotiations on the alliance with
the former interior minister, MP Sulayman Franjiyah, but full details
are not yet known.

Regarding the elections in the north, informed sources have told
Al-Mustaqbal that a Syrian team made up of three security officers,
who were part of the Syrian security agency which operated in Lebanon
in the past, is running the election process from Tripoli to confront
the opposition lists. The team held several meetings with candidates
and “key” figures. The three officers are Muhammad Khalluf (former
security official in Beirut), Nabil Hushaymi (who was in charge of
the Syrian security in Akkar) and Khalil Zughayb (former security
official in Tripoli).

B’abda-Aley

Thirdly, in the B’abda-Aley constituency, it was learnt that
negotiations between the Progressive Socialist Party [PSP] and the
National Liberal Party are making progress towards adding Ilyas
Abu-Asi, a leading figure in the Liberals, to the opposition list
in the constituency. Parallel to this possible development, the
coordination committees between the PSP and the “Forces” in the
constituency have been active (the candidate of this constituency is
Dr Edmond Na’im). These committees are organizing meetings for the
staff of the two sides and also conducting tours in various areas.

In the meantime, there was a “surprising” shift by candidate Shakib
Qurtubawi from the Qurnat Shahwan [Gathering] to the Free National
Current. Awn will announce today the list of the alliance between him
and Arsalan. The list includes a Shi’i, Ramzi Kanj. It also includes
Shakib Qurtubawi, Hikmat Dib, Naji Garyus and Ghalib al-A’war, in
addition to Arsalan, Marwan Abu-Fadil and As’ad Abu-Ra’d.

MP Walid Junblatt, head of the Democratic Forum, paid a visit yesterday
to Al-Musaylih, where he met with Chamber of Deputies Speaker Nabih
Birri. part of the discussion focused on the elections in B’abda-Aley.

Al-Matn-Kisrawan-Jubayl

Fourth, in Al-Matn al-Shamali [northern Al-Matn], sources in
the opposition have told Al-Mustaqbal that the formation of the
opposition list is still in collision with the “Armenian factor”
because of [former] President Amin al-Jumayyil’s wish not to nominate
an Armenian on the list. On the other hand, MP Nasib Lahhud is keen
on nominating Rafi Madayan. It was understood that Al-Jumayyil does
not want Al-Tashnaq to declare mobilization against the opposition
list, while Lahhud believes that this does not change anything and
that Madayan can secure Armenian votes for his list.

As for the Armenian factor, there is a discussion about the possibility
of not forming a closed list, while the Catholic seat seems to favour
Roger Ma’luf (from the Liberals). With regard to the Free National
Current, it is apparently heading towards forming a dual list that
includes Edgar Ma’luf (Catholic) and Ibrahim Kan’an (Maronite). Awn
did not deny the alliance with MP Michel al-Murr and said that he had
expressed his thanks to Al-Murr “if he wants to give us his votes,
but we do not have anything to give him in return”.

Fifth, as for Kisrawan-Jubayl, which the opposition describes as
the “mother of battles”, the alliance is settled between two MPs
Mansur Ghanim al-Bawn and Faris Sa’id with the Lebanese Forces and
the National Bloc through its dean Carlos Iddah, and the Democratic
Renewal Movement, which has nominated former MP Kamil Ziyadah.

B’alabakk-Al-Hirmil

Sixth, in the B’alabakk-Al-Hirmil constituency, and while Hezbollah
has not yet decided the name of the candidate who will replace the
Ba’th candidate, Al-Mustaqbal has learnt that a strong list will
confront Hezbollah’s list, including former MP Albert Mansur (facing
the nationalist candidate Marwan Faris); Tariq Habashi (facing MP Nadir
Sukkar, candidate of the Baqraduni Phalanges Party); and two Sunni
candidates, Husayn Sulh and Husayn or Mustafa al-Hajjiri. There are
efforts to include former MP Yahya Shams, who is described as strong
in the constituency since he enjoys the support of the tribes and
families of Al-Hirmil area, and to include Rif’at Nayif al-Masri,
Hafiz Amhaz, Hasan Nabha and Ali al-Musawi for the Shi’i seats.
Meanwhile [former] parliament Speaker Husayn al-Husayni is standing
in the elections on the alliance list with Hezbollah.

UPI INtelligence Watch…

UPI INtelligence Watch…

United Press International
June 1 2005

On May 3 Uzbekistan announced it was withdrawing from the
Georgia-Ukraine-Uzbekistan-Azerbaijan-Moldova pact, known informally
as GUUAM. Now Armenian Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian says Armenia
may consider joining GUAM (Georgia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan and Moldova)
if it receives an official invitation proposal. Oskanian made his
observation in response to a comment by Ukrainian parliamentary
Speaker Vladimir Litvin that other countries, including Armenia,
may join GUAM. Oskanian sounded a cautious note, remarking, “Before
joining any organization one should study its goals and principles
of activity” even as he noted “GUAM is currently reconsidering its
goals and principles.” Only two months ago Oskanian ruled out Armenia
facilitating its ties with GUUAM or seeking observer status in the
organization. In late 2000 Oskanian harshly criticized GUUAM, stating
that the grouping “negatively affects the integration processes in
the CIS,” noting then that all GUUAM member states were represented
in the CIS and that “nothing hinders them from solving problems
of economic integration within the framework the Commonwealth of
Independent States.”

ANKARA: ATAA Chairman: Allegations About So-called Armenian Genocide

ATAA Chairman: Allegations About So-called Armenian Genocide Are Not Humanitarian, But Political

Turkish Press
June 1 2005

ANKARA (AA) – Allegations about so-called Armenian genocide were not
humanitarian, on the contrary, they were political, Vural Cengiz,
the chairman of the Assembly of Turkish-American Associations (ATAA),
said on Tuesday.

Holding a news conference after holding talks with the Turkish
government officials, Cengiz said, “we support the latest attitude of
the Turkish government against allegations about so-called genocide.”

“Any attempt to open the border crossing between Turkey and Armenia
will not eliminate those allegations since the Armenian plan is
composed of four stages: terrorism, recognition, compensation and
claims for territory. Armenian diaspora describes Republic of Armenia
as eastern Armenia and eastern part of Turkey as western Armenia,”
he said.

Cengiz added that they were planning to hold demonstrations to express
their reaction against those allegations.

Armenian CB President to participate XIV International Bank Congress

ARMENIAN CB PRESIDENT TO PARTICIPATE XIV INTERNATIONAL BANK CONGRESS

Pan Armenian News
01.06.2005 04:27

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ June 1 on the invitation of the Russian Central
Bank President head of the Armenian CB Tigran Sargsian departed for
Saint Petersburg to take part in the XIV International Bank Congress
entitled “Banks: regulations and economy”. The RA CB President will
give a report on the financial-crediting policy, currency regulations
and banking control. The Congress participants are expected to
discuss the prospects of development of the Russian banking system
for 2005-2008, the strategy of the development at the present stage,
urgent issues referring to the regulation of the activities of the
Russian crediting organizations, interaction of banks and economy,
etc., IA Regnum reports.