Vazgen Manukyan assesses the latest suggestions of the mediator inco

Vazgen Manukyan assesses the latest suggestions of the mediator incomparably
better

ArmRadio.am
18.07.2006 17:35

"The last document connected with the settlement of the Karabakh
issue, which is more or less spoken about, is inconsiderably better,"
declared NA Deputy, President of the of the National Democratic Union
Vazgen Manukyan.

In his words, although he does not agree with the new suggestions,
but he assesses these positive as compared with the previous ones.

"None of the existing documents can suggest the resolution of the
issue," Vazgen Manukyan assured.

In his words, the parties may make concessions in regard to
territories, refuges, economy, communications, etc., but the core of
the conflict is Nagorno Karabakh.

Therefore, if there is no agreement over this core issue, the question
cannot be resolved via signing a document. Vazgen Manukyan reminded
that the world history knows one similar case, when a territory was
taken from one party and transferred to another one, despite there
was no such will.

According to the speaker, the talks should continue, and it is useful
for Azerbaijan. According to Vazgen Manukyan, the group engaged in
the negotiations is carrying out its obligations with a great skill.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Armenia Already Needs A Defense Minister

ARMENIA ALREADY NEEDS A DEFENSE MINISTER
By HAKOB BADALYAN

Lragir.am
18 July 06

The internal political situation in Armenia is entering a rather
interesting stage, for the period of orientation of the minister of
defense is ending. On July 22 it will be over, and we will learn what
position Serge Sargsyan will have in the Republican Party. Then the
activity of all the spheres of life of Armenia may normalize because
people will stop taking interest in the plans of the defense minister
and will mind their own duties.

But if Serge Sargsyan’s membership to the Republican Party may help
restore the normal schedule of work, it will hardly be possible
to say the same about the sphere led by Serge Sargsyan. It is
possible that the defense minister will occupy a rather high post
in the Republican Party. So high that he will not be inferior to
Andranik Margaryan. They even say it is going to be the post of the
co-leader of the party. What is the point of his membership if he is
not going to have an influential lever in the party? It is true that
a post is not essential to having levers, especially in the case of
Serge Sargsyan, for in the post of defense minister he had almost
presidential power. At least, everyone in the public and political
sphere thought him to have. The same can be inside the Republican
Party. Now the situation is different, however.

Serge Sargsyan has already adopted a policy of formal
powers. Therefore, he acquired posts in the spheres of economy,
education and even sport. In other words, the defense minister
either formalized his powers or simply tried his best to acquire
these powers because if one or two years ago he could nourish the
myth about his almightiness because he was the most reliable person
for Robert Kocharyan, now everything is different. It is obvious that
Serge Sargsyan is not the only reliable person for Robert Kocharyan,
let alone the most reliable one. There is a lot of evidence to
this. The most recent evidence is Vardan Oskanyan’s speech on July
14, when the foreign minister made a speech on home policies, in
fact. And it is more notable that it happened on the day when Serge
Sargsyan announced that he submitted an application for membership to
the Republican Party. Obviously, stopping to be Robert Kocharyan’s
"favorite son" (though he may have never been such), Serge Sargsyan
had no other way out but to gain as much formal levers as possible,
which he will need for his political plans, because he cannot go on
to rely on Robert Kocharyan’s levers any longer.

The administrative-criminal resource too, reliant on the defense
minister, has already started accepting "cash" only, and wants to
make sure that the "boss" really has power, he is the formal bearer
of power. In this case, a leading post in the Republican Party is
not just a caprice or a matter of choice for Serge Sargsyan. It is
a vital necessity. In fact, it is evident that it takes the defense
minister five minutes to become a public political-party figure. And
he kickstarted the activity on July 14.

For the first time the defense minister said "why not" for the
possibility that he will be president. In other words, Serge
Sargsyan announced for the first time that he is considering
presidency. Formerly, he had not stated that he did not think about
it, of course, but now he shows that he is thinking about it.

Here it is worthwhile to recall an episode from the recent visit of
the Russian defense minister Sergey Ivanov to Armenia. When Ivanov was
answering questions of news reporters sitting beside Serge Sargsyan,
he was asked if he might be the next president of Russia.

Sergey Ivanov said he is a defense minister, and if he starts thinking
about becoming president, he would perform his duties of defense
minister badly. Serge Sargsyan probably did not hear these words
though he was sitting the closest to him.

In this respect, it might be necessary to remind this episode,
which would be useful for normal activities of the sphere of defense,
essential to the country’s security. It’s a pity the president has gone
on holiday because at the moment learning or recalling Ivanov’s words
is much more important for him. If the defense or whatever minister
starts thinking about presidency and taking definite steps in this
direction, real danger occurs that the official will start thinking
less about his or her own duties. In this very case, the sphere of
defense is concerned.

Meanwhile, it is notable that over the past few weeks the head of
the defense ministry of Armenia has attended to everything except
defense. At least, very few of his recent public speeches referred to
defense. These were mostly speeches about chess, energy, gas pipelines,
parliamentary elections, education, encouragement to businessman and
now parliamentary and presidential success of the Republican Party.

Apparently Armenia needs a new defense minister for the country to
mind its own business and Serge Sargsyan to mind his own political
business. In this sense it might be even good that the president has
gone on holiday, for Robert Kocharyan will have time to consider naming
a new minister not to waste too much time on the protocol. It is also
possible that the defense minister has already thought about his fate,
and maybe he will submit his resignation. At least the National Unity
Party, widely known to everyone, says this is a possible thing. The
supporters of Unity say a resignation would bring points of political
honesty to Serge Sargsyan. In other words, the defense minister
will retire as a hero. It is also possible that he will declare the
conflict over Karabakh as the cause of his resignation, announcing
that he is against returning lands, rather than his activity in the
party and his reluctance to politicize the army.

Hence, here is a situation, which the minister of defense can use for
his interests, publicly countering Robert Kocharyan and presenting
the president as someone who "returns the territories".

Indeed, this step needs to be estimated deeply to find out what is more
important, the lever of the army or political dividends. After all,
it is not clear what resource the defense minister will be using to
become president: political, which is on the zero point, or military
criminal, which passed the test of time.

By the way, the army is also waiting for him to make a decision.

After all, it is equally important for the army to learn what the
defense minister will eventually be doing. Perhaps, however, we will
not be mistaken to say that it is even more important for the army
to know what the commander-in-chief is doing. Can you imagine if he
also failed to think about the country’s defense capacity? What would
the citizens of the country think about him?

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

ASBAREZ Online [07-18-2006]

ASBAREZ ONLINE
TOP STORIES
07/18/2006
TO ACCESS PREVIOUS ASBAREZ ONLINE EDITIONS PLEASE VISIT OUR
WEBSITE AT <;HTTP://WWW.ASBAREZ. COM

1. ANCA Urges Senate to Block Hoagland Nomination
2. Lebanon ARF Condemns Israeli Attacks, Call for Community Unity
3. House Members Disturbed by State Department Non-Response to on Evans Firing
4. Karabakh Welcomes G8 Calls on Peace
5. US Warns Turkey Against Iraq Incursion, Erdogan Decries ‘Double Standards’

1. ANCA Urges Senate to Block Hoagland Nomination

WASHINGTON–Citing US Ambassador-designate Richard Hoagland’s denial of the
Armenian Genocide and his contradictory responses to Senate inquiries – both
against the background of the continued failure of the Administration to offer
a meaningful and forthright explanation of its reasons for firing the current
US Ambassador, John Evans – the Armenian National Committee of America Tuesday
issued a statement formally opposing Hoagland’s nomination to serve as the
next
US Ambassador to Armenia.
A July 16 policy editorial published by the Los Angeles Times called on the US
Senate to block Ambassador-designate Hoagland’s nomination until he properly
recognizes the Armenian Genocide. The strongly worded piece urged the Bush
administration to "explain forthrightly – not just to Armenian Americans
but to
all Americans who believe in calling evil by its proper name – why US
policy is
being dictated by Ankara nationalists."
"Ambassador-designate Richard Hoagland has disqualified himself as a candidate
to serve as our nation’s ambassador to the Republic of Armenia," said the ANCA
statement.
During the course of his Senate confirmation process, Ambassador-designate
Richard Hoagland has taken a number of actions that demonstrate that he cannot
effectively represent US interests and American values, among them:
1. Asserting that the Armenian Genocide does not qualify as an instance of
genocide
2. Providing contradictory statements or failing to respond to US Senate
inquiries
3. Abandoning America’s leadership on genocide prevention

The complete text of the announcement can be found on asbarez.com.

1. Asserting that the Armenian Genocide does not qualify as an instance of
genocide

Ambassador-designate Hoagland has disqualified himself as the next US
Ambassador to Armenia by engaging in denial of the Armenian Genocide.
Consistent with the denials issued by the Turkish government, Ambassador
Hoagland argues that the Armenian Genocide does not qualify as an instance of
genocide because of the absence, on the part of the perpetrator, of a
"specific
intent to destroy, in whole or in substantial part," the victim group.
In a July 14th response to a written question from Senator Barbara Boxer
(D-CA)
concerning why the US does not consider the Armenian Genocide an instance of
genocide, Ambassador-designate Hoagland selectively cited one of the five
"understandings" expressed by the US at the time of the US ratification of the
UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide,
namely
that, "genocidal intent meant a ‘specific intent to destroy, in whole or in
substantial part,’ the group as such."
Additionally, in a dramatic retreat to the more blatant forms of denial
typical
of the State Department’s opposition to Armenian Genocide recognition during
the 1980s, Ambassador-designate Hoagland referred to statements on the
Armenian
Genocide as allegations. In a response to a written inquiry from Senator John
Kerry (D-MA) concerning Turkey’s criminal prosecution of journalists for
writing about the Armenian Genocide, Ambassador-designate Hoagland
characterized their factual affirmations of the Armenian Genocide as simply
allegations.
As Senator Norm Coleman (R-MN) stated during Ambassador-designate Hoagland’s
confirmation hearing, "I am not sure how we can continue to have
Ambassadors to
Armenia who can be effective, unless they give recognition to the Genocide."
Sadly, Ambassador-designate Hoagland has gone far beyond the traditional
Administration practice of failing to properly recognize the Armenian
Genocide.
He has, instead, placed himself firmly into the camp of the Turkish government
by publicly denying the genocidal nature of this crime. His nomination, if
confirmed, would represent a dramatic escalation in US complicity in Turkey’s
campaign of denial.

2. Providing contradictory statements or failing to respond to US Senate
inquiries

Ambassador-designate Hoagland has disqualified himself as the next US
Ambassador to Armenia by making contradictory and inconsistent statements to
the US Senate regarding his views on the Armenian Genocide. In many instances,
he did not respond to specific Senate inquiries.
In responses to questions submitted by Senators Lincoln Chafee (R-RI) and John
Kerry (D-MA), he denied that he had been counseled not to refer to the events
of 1915 as the Armenian Genocide. Yet, in the course of responding to
questioning at his confirmation hearing and to several dozen written
inquiries,
he went to extreme lengths to avoid using this term. Either he has misled
Senators regarding the guidance he has received, or he has chosen to avoid
using the term genocide on his own accord – both profoundly troubling
developments that disqualify him from serving as the US envoy in Yerevan.
More broadly, Ambassador-designate Hoagland’s July 14th claim that the
Armenian
Genocide does not meet the US government’s definition of genocide stands in
stark contrast to his repeated assertions to US Senators that the
Administration does not deny the events of 1915:
* In response to a question about US policy on the Armenian Genocide from
Senator Allen (R-VA) during the June 28th confirmation hearing,
Ambassador-designate Hoagland asserted that, "No one in this administration
has
ever denied the events beginning in the 20th century at the end of the Ottoman
Empire that befell the Armenian nation and people."
* In response to a question from Senator Coleman (R-MN) regarding whether
Ambassador-designate Hoagland agreed with then-Governor Bush’s statements
affirming the Armenian Genocide, he stated: "I fully agree that the events
that
occurred on 1915 and following were of historic proportion. As I said
well-documented, horrific and horrifying and as we heard from Senator Sarbanes
in his statement early on — hundreds of valleys devastated no family
untouched. It was historic. It was a tragedy. Everyone agrees with that."
* In response to a written inquiry from Senator John Kerry (D-MA) asking if he
disputed a series of nine facts about the Armenian Genocide,
Ambassador-designate Hoagland did not dispute that: "The atrocities conceived
and carried out by the Ottoman Empire from 1915 to 1923 … resulted in the
elimination of the more than 2,500-year presence of Armenians in their
historic
homeland."
* In response to subsequent questions from Senator Kerry asking about the
Administration’s denial of the Armenian Genocide and the consequences of its
non-recognition, Ambassador-designate Hoagland stated that, "the
Administration
does not deny the tragic events that occurred in the final years of the
Ottoman
Empire," and that: "the Administration does recognize the massacre or forced
exile of as many as 1.5 million Armenians in the final years of the Ottoman
Empire."

3. Abandoning America’s leadership on genocide prevention

Ambassador-designate Hoagland has additionally disqualified himself as the
next
US Ambassador to Armenia by failing to grasp the fundamental need for US moral
leadership in condemning and preventing genocide.
In response to a question from Senator Kerry, Ambassador-designate Hoagland
stated that, "The US believes that the question of how to characterize these
horrific events is of such enormous human significance that it should not be
determined on the basis of politics, but through heartfelt introspection among
academics, civic leaders, and societies."
Ambassador-designate Hoagland’s formulation could not be more deeply
flawed. It
is precisely because of the enormity of the Armenian Genocide that the US
should address this crime with absolute moral and historical clarity. By
delegating the characterization of the Armenian Genocide to a dialogue between
the unrepentant perpetrators of Genocide and the survivors and descendants of
those who perished, the Ambassador-designate argues for effectively reducing
our nation’s response to genocide to the level acceptable to the Turkish
government. Our nation’s human rights policy should never be held hostage by a
foreign country–particularly one that is regularly cited as among the world’s
worst human rights abusers.
For these reasons, we respectfully request that the US Senate not move forward
with Ambassador Hoagland’s nomination.

2. Lebanon ARF Condemns Israeli Attacks, Call for Community Unity

BEIRUT, YEREVAN (Aztag, Armenpress)–The Armenian Revolutionary Federation
Central Committee of Lebanon issued an announcement Monday condemning the
Israeli bombing of Lebanon and "infringing on Lebanon’s sovereignty," reported
the Beirut-based Aztag daily newspaper.
The announcement called on "the international community and humanitarian
organizations to immediately intervene in order to suppress Israel’s attacks
against Lebanon."
The Lebanon ARF Central Committee concluded by announcing that its affiliate
relief, social service and humanitarian organizations were prepared to take in
all Lebanese refugees who have been displaced by the bombings.
In Yerevan, some 160 Armenian nationals and dozens of other residents of
Lebanon have been evacuated to Armenia since the start of Israel’s devastating
strikes against the war-torn nation, officials there said on Tuesday, reported
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.
According to the Armenian Foreign Ministry, just over a hundred of them were
airlifted to Yerevan from the Syrian city of Aleppo on board an Armenian
passenger jet early in the morning.
"The Armenian consulate in Aleppo was directly involved in the effort,
accompanying this group of people from the Lebanese border to Aleppo
yesterday," a ministry spokesman, Vladimir Karapetian, told RFE/RL. "Then the
group headed to Armenia by air."
Karapetian said most of these evacuees are Lebanese citizens, many of them of
Armenian descent, as well as other foreigners. Less than half of them are
citizens of Armenia, he added.
The Foreign Ministry estimates that there were approximately 1,200 Armenian
nationals residing in Lebanon at least before the start of the Israeli
military
campaign a week ago. Prime Minister Andranik Margaryan on Thursday held an
emergency meeting with high-ranking government officials to discuss ways of
organizing their repatriation. A government statement quoted Deputy Foreign
Minister Gegham Gharibjanian as saying at the meeting that two Armenian
diplomats have already been sent to Lebanon and Syria to assist in the
effort.
The head of the Armenian government’s civil aviation department, Artyom
Movsesian, suggested that the Armavia national airline will have to carry out
additional flights to Aleppo and Damascus to cope with a "large number of
those
willing to arrive in Armenia." Markarian agreed, saying that the government is
ready to partly subsidize the extra flights, according to the statement.
"I wouldn’t say there is a widespread desire [to escape to Armenia] at the
moment," said Karapetian. "Nonetheless, our embassy there does receive such
requests."

3. House Members Disturbed by State Department Non-Response to on Evans Firing

WASHINGTON–Members of the US House of Representatives have expressed
disappointment at the Administration’s repeated failure to provide a clear and
straightforward explanation for the
dismissal of US Ambassador to Armenia John Marshall Evans, even as the State
Department issued yet another letter sidestepping the issue, reported the
Armenian National Committee of America.
In their response to the May 22 letter spearheaded by Rep. Edward Markey
(D-MA)
and cosigned by 60 House members, Assistant Secretary for Legislative Affairs
Jeffrey Bergner failed, once again, to address reports that Amb. Evans’ was
being recalled for his statements on the Armenian Genocide.  The letter began
with the well-worn refrain that "All Ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the
President and as advocates of the President’s policies."  He went on to argue
that, "allegations that the US is removing Ambassador Evans under pressure
from
the Government of Turkey are simply untrue," despite the fact that numerous
Turkish press accounts in March of 2005 reported  that then Turkish Ambassador
to the US Faruk Logoglu did indeed protest Amb. Evans’ remarks to State
Department officials.
The State Department’s letter, sent to House Members on July 11th, went on to
state that "The United States has never denied the tragic events of 1915 .
. . 
We believe this tragedy is of such enormous human significance that its
characterization should be determined through heartfelt dialogue, not through
diplomatic or political proclamations."
Several House Members immediately reacted to the response, expressing concern
that the State Department has, yet again, avoided providing a clear reasoning
for the Amb. Evans firing.
"The Bush Administration has once again failed to answer the question of
whether or not the early departure of US Ambassador to Armenia John Evans is
related to comments he made about the Armenian Genocide. Moreover, the Bush
Administration continues to duck when given the opportunity to properly
recognize the Armenian Genocide," explained Rep. Markey.  "The time has long
since passed for President Bush to follow through on his campaign promises and
properly recognize the Armenian Genocide.  Only after President Bush
accurately
refers to the mass killings of 1.5 million Armenians as genocide can we
finally
tear down the last walls of
denial."
Similarly, Congressional Armenian Genocide resolution lead sponsor George
Radanovich (R-CA), lamented that "This response was, unfortunately, what we
have come to expect from the Administration and those before it  respectfully
acknowledging the mass killing
of 1.5 million Armenians, but refusing to properly call it genocide.  It is
simply incomprehensible to me how anyone can recognize the tragic events of
1915, then turn around and implicitly deny that genocide occurred by refusing
to call it such for political reasons.  I just don’t understand that."
Rep. Sander Levin (D-MI) wrote a letter back objecting to the State
Department’s response and calling the President’s actions on Armenian Genocide
recognition "woefully inadequate."  Rep. Levin stated, "I did have a strong
negative reaction to your comments about 1915.  I urge the President to do
more
than ‘call on all concerned parties to engage in thoughtful introspection’
which is woefully inadequate in the face of the Administration’s repeated
failure to call a genocide a genocide."
Again responding to the State Departments July 11 letter, Rep. Adam Schiff
(D-CA) noted that, "The State Department’s non-response on the issue of
Ambassador Evan’s departure confirms what we all know — the Ambassador was
pushed out the door for telling the truth about the Armenian Genocide. This
marks a sad day for the State Department when it compounds an unwillingness to
acknowledge one of the great crimes in human history and more, disciplines
those who do."
Rep. Schiff also commented on the State Department’s lack of response to a
series of questions submitted during a House International Relations Committee
hearing with Secretary Rice in February 16, 2006.  "Secretary of State Rice’s
failure to adequately respond to questions I posed to her on this issue at a
hearing months ago, is a further indication of the Department’s illicit motive
for Evan’s hasty removal."
Similarly, Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ) noted that "The belated response from the
State Department regarding our inquiry into the removal of Ambassador Evans is
yet another statement without a real explanation. Reports suggest that
Evans is
being unjustly penalized for speaking the truth.  It is unacceptable for the
Bush administration to punish Evans for his comments. What he did was
courageous and should be viewed as such."
In their letter to the State Department, Rep. Markey and fellow Congressional
cosigners expressed special concern about the destructive precedent of
recalling a US diplomat for speaking truthfully on matters of historical
record. They wrote that, "we must not allow the perception to linger that he
[Amb. Evans] is being required to vacate his position early for accurately
labeling the cataclysmic events of 1915 as genocide." The Representatives,
noting President Ronald Reagan’s references to the Armenian Genocide, reminded
Secretary Rice that Amb. Evans "did nothing more than succinctly repeat the
conclusions enunciated by those before him."
The Congressional signatories also expressed concern about the role of the
Government of Turkey in the impending removal of Amb. Evans from his posting.
"Were the United States to allow the views or beliefs of a third country to
interfere with our diplomatic postings to the Republic of Armenia," wrote the
House members, "it would establish a dangerous precedent and be injurious to
the long-standing relationship built on trust and friendship between the two
countries."

4. Karabakh Welcomes G8 Calls on Peace

STEPANAKERT (Armenpress)–Nagorno-Karabakh Republic authorities Tuesday
welcomed a statement by G8 leaders issued  in St. Petersburg  calling over the
weekend calling on Armenia and Azerbaijan "to demonstrate the political will,
reach agreement and prepare their publics for peace and not for war."
"We confirmed that the Group of Eight supports the mediation efforts of the
co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group and stressed the need for agreeing on the
basic principles of a peaceful settlement of the conflict as early as in
2006,"
the G-8 statement said.
"One may only welcome the  G8 statement on maintaining the mediation
efforts of
the OSCE Minsk Group and on the necessity for coordinating the core principles
of the conflict’s peaceful resolution,"  Nagorno-Karabakh foreign minister
Georgi Petrossian said Tuesday in an statement issued by the ministry.
"The Nagorno-Karabakh Republic has always been in favor of a peaceful
resolution to the conflict and is prepared to exert every effort to achieve an
agreement on establishing long-term peace in the region. Unfortunately, not
everything hinges on the efforts of the mediators. Azerbaijan’s extremely
negative position and its unwillingness to be in any contact with
Nagorno-Karabakh has made finding an acceptable and proper solution very
difficult to date," added Petrossian
"The Russian president has fairly suggested that it would not impose any
solutions on the parties to the conflict and that the compromise must be
reached by the people. Taking into account the Russia’s readiness to become a
guarantor of the agreement’s provisions, once again, we reiterate that
resolutions directly concerning the future of our country and our people only
would be possible with participation of representatives of legally elected
authorities of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic–the main party to the conflict,"
he said.
In an interview with the Itar-Tass news agency, Azeri foreign ministry
spokesperson Tayir Taghizadeh also welcomed the G8 statement on the Karabakh
conflict resolution process.
"This is very positive for Azerbaijan. We have always called on the world
community and its leaders to accelerate their efforts toward the resolution of
the conflict," Taghizade said.
The foreign ministry official characterized Azerbaijan as a "victim of
Armenian
aggression," and questioned a portion of the G8 announcement, which calls on
both Armenia and Azerbaijan to make equal concessions in the conflict
resolution process.
"Azerbaijan supports the peaceful resolution of the conflict," Taghizade said,
adding that the OSCE Minsk Group efforts were the necessary factor for the
successful continuation of the peaceful negotiations.
"At the same time we cannot conduct negotiations just for the sake of
negotiations. In case the diplomatic efforts produce no results, our country
has the sovereign right to restore its territorial integrity," the
spokesperson
said.

5. US Warns Turkey Against Iraq Incursion, Erdogan Decries ‘Double Standards’

ANKARA (AFP) –The United States has warned Turkey that a cross-border
operation against Kurdish bases in northern Iraq would be "unwise," drawing
angry accusations from Ankara that Washington is using double standards in the
region.
"We have repeatedly said that we believe that unilateral military action
across
the border with Iraq would be unwise," the US amabassador to Turkey, Ross
Wilson, said in an interview with the NTV news channel.
He was speaking after Ankara on Monday urged Washington and Baghdad to act
against the separatist Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), whose militants have
enjoyed safe haven in the mountains of northern Iraq, signaling that it is
ready to take cross-border action if they fail to do so.
Ankara says the PKK, listed as a terrorist group by Turkey, the United States
and the European union, uses bases in northern Iraq as a springboard to launch
attacks in adjoining southeast Turkey.
It has made clear that its patience is running out after rebel attacks claimed
the lives of 15 security force members over the past week.
"The PKK is not a just a northern Iraq problem — it’s a problem in Europe and
it’s a problem in Turkey," Wilson said.
"Going to deal with the PKK in northern Iraq will not solve the problem," he
said. "It will not lead to what we or Iraq or Turkey want to see, which is the
termination of these terrorist activities and the termination of the death and
suffering that the people of Turkey have faced."
Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan quickly hit back, highlighting
Washington’s
support for Israeli military offensives against militants in Lebanon and the
Gaza Strip.
"Terrorism is terrorism everywhere," Erdogan said in Istanbul. "It is not
possible to agree with a mentality that tolerates country A and displays a
different attitude when it comes to country B."
Dismissing the ambassador’s warning, Erdogan reiterated that Turkey would be
prepared to conduct cross-border military operations in northern Iraq and
hinted that contingency plans were already being drawn up.
"At the end of the day, we know how to take care of our problems," he said.
"The competent authorities are working accordingly… We keep ourselves ready
against possible developments."
The United States’ failure to crack down on the PKK has often poisoned its
ties
with Turkey, a key Muslim ally in the Middle East, and has been blamed as a
prime reason for growing anti-US sentiment among Turks.
At least 87 PKK members and 51 members of the security forces have died this
year in southeast Turkey, according to an AFP count.
Kurdish militants also claimed responsibility for 11 bomb attacks in urban
centers, in which nine people were killed and nearly 140 injured.
Wilson said Washington had achieved "some success" in disrupting the flow of
funds financing the PKK’s armed campaign and pledged continued support.
The United States, he said, is discussing both with the central government in
Baghdad and the Kurdistan regional authorities in the north "the need to take
action to curb PKK activities and their apparent freedom to maneuver and
operate."
Washington is ready "to continue and make more effective US-Turkish
collaboration in Iraq to cut off funding, apprehend PKK leaders who are
operating there and shut down PKK front groups," Wilson said.
Washington has been unwilling to take action against the PKK in northern Iraq,
arguing that Iraqi and coalition forces are swamped with violence in other
parts of the country and that military operations could upset the relative
stability of the Kurdish-populated region.

All subscription inquiries and changes must be made through the proper carrier
and not Asbarez Online. ASBAREZ ONLINE does not transmit address changes and
subscription requests.
(c) 2006 ASBAREZ ONLINE. All Rights Reserved.

ASBAREZ provides this news service to ARMENIAN NEWS NETWORK members for
academic research or personal use only and may not be reproduced in or through
mass media outlets.

–Boundary_(ID_+OiAgTFwtfiF69HelEoC/A)–

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

http://www.asbarez.com/&gt

Azerbaijan: Verdict against youth activists raises int’l concern

AZERBAIJAN: VERDICT AGAINST YOUTH ACTIVISTS RAISES INTERNATIONAL CONCERN
By Shahin Abbasov and Khadija Ismailova 7/17/06

EurasiaNet, NY
July 17 2006

International organizations and foreign governments are criticizing a
recent Azerbaijani court verdict, in which leaders of the Yeni Fikir
(New Idea) youth organization were found guilty of plotting a coup
and sentenced to as many as seven-years in prison.

A Baku court found Ruslan Bashirli, the former head of Yeni Fikir,
and his deputies, Ramin Tagiyev and Said Nuri, guilty of trying to
overthrow President Ilham Aliyev’s administration under the terms of
article 278 of the Criminal Code of Azerbaijan. The sentences were
handed down July 12 during an unscheduled court sitting not attended
by defense lawyers, media representatives or the families of the
accused. Bashirli received the lengthiest prison term – seven years.

Tagiyev was given a four-year sentence and Nuri received a suspended
sentence of five years.

During the trial, the prosecution accused the Norwegian Embassy, the
National Democratic Institute, a US non-governmental organization
(NGO), and former US presidential advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski of
instructing Yeni Fikir members on subversive political tactics.

Nelson C. Ledsky, NDI’s regional director for Eurasia, characterized
the accusation as "false," adding that the NGO had "no involvement"
with Bashirli.

The youth activists were arrested during the run-up to Azerbaijan’s
November 2005 parliamentary elections. [For background see the Eurasia
Insight archive]. Opposition parties portrayed the cases against
the youth activists as a government attempt to silence criticism
and to prevent possible mass protests. Youth groups in Georgia and
Ukraine played key roles in organizing demonstrations in 2003 and 2004
respectively that forced the incumbent governments in both states from
power. [For background see the Eurasia Insight archive]. Yeni Fikir
is loosely associated with the Popular Front Party of Azerbaijan,
one of the country’s largest opposition parties.

Bashirli was arrested last August 3 after a video was handed over
to prosecutors that depicted the youth activist taking $ 2,000 "for
the development of democracy" from a person later identified by the
prosecutor’s office as an alleged agent of the Armenian security
services. [For background see the Eurasia Insight archive]. A fellow
Yeni Fikir member, who traveled with Bashirli to Tbilisi where the
meeting occurred, served as prosecutors’ chief source for the alleged
connection with the Armenia.

In comments to EurasiaNet, Osman Kazimov, the Yeni Fikir group’s
defense lawyer, argued that prosecutors never proved their case,
and that the government staged the trial to discredit the Azerbaijani
opposition by linking them with the Armenian special services.

On July 13, the Baku mission of the Organization for Security and
Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) issued a statement that expressed
"concern" over the conduct of the trial. "Notwithstanding the
extreme severity of [the] sentences which were handed down with
inadequate notice and in the absence of [the] defendants’ advocates,
the process leading to their arraignment and the proceedings at trial
fell short of international standards in upholding the rule of law,"
the statement read.

The OSCE mission called on the government "to take urgent and
appropriate steps to fully ensure the rights of the individual during
proceedings that are conducted in accordance with the rule of law."

The British and US embassies echoed those concerns. In a July 13
statement, the US embassy noted that "indicators existed that the
defendants’ rights to equal protection before the law, presumption of
innocence and an impartial hearing were not respected." The British
embassy stressed the importance of ensuring that any appeal is
conducted according to due process, and noted that it would continue
to follow the Yeni Fikir case "closely."

Prosecutors insist that the trial was conducted in accordance with
international and national laws, noting that the accused were given
defense lawyers and that, while initial sittings of the court were
closed for "national security concerns," later sessions had been
open. "Bashirli and his deputies have been convicted because their
crimes have been proved. If they do not agree with the court’s
decision, they can use their right to appeal to a higher court,"
said Vugar Aliyev, spokesperson for the Azerbaijan Chief Prosecutor’s
Office.

Those close to the defendants, however, believe there is virtually
no chance that the verdicts against the trio can be reversed on appeal.

"The court sentenced him now, but the government did it from the very
beginning," said Bashirli’s fiancee, who asked only to be identified
by her first name, Vusala. Reporters from state television and the
pro-government Leader TV encouraged Vusala to announce that she had
ended her relationship with Bashirli, she claimed. She continues to
defend Bashirli, however, asserting that the youth activist "loves
Azerbaijan and would never betray the motherland."

Bashirli’s mother, who has not seen her son since his arrest, also
defended her son. "They tortured him, and did not even provide him with
medical treatment unless international organizations protested his bad
treatment. They beat him to get testimony against [opposition leader]
Ali Kerimli and his Popular Front Party. Ruslan refused to do so,"
Zemfira Bashirli said. "This is not a country to live in. Ruslan wanted
to improve things in the country and fell victim to his struggle."

Representatives of the Popular Front Party, which has continued
to support Yeni Fikir, argue that the trial was intended to scare
Azerbaijani youth out of becoming politically active. Ramin Hasanov,
head of the ruling Yeni Azerbaijan Party’s youth organization, denied
that the trial was politically motivated. In a July 12 interview with
the Voice of America, Hasanov maintained that "the court just gave
its assessment of the crime."

Editor’s Note: Khadija Ismayilova is an analyst based in Washington.

Shain Abbasov is a freelance journalist based in Baku.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

G8: Soonest Coordination of Principles on Karabakh Essential

G8: Soonest Coordination of Principles on Karabakh Essential

PanARMENIAN.Net
17.07.2006 15:46 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ During the summit the G8 leaders referred to the
situation in Nagorno Karabakh, says the statement by G8 Summit
President. The document says in part, "We confirmed that the G8
supports the mediating efforts of the OSCE Minsk Group (Russia,
the United States and France) and stressed the necessity of soonest
coordination of the principles of a peaceful settlement in 2006. We
call on Azerbaijan and Armenia to demonstrate political will, achieve
an agreement and prepare their public for peace but not for war."

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Vartan Oskanian States Armenia Ready to Accept Principles Suggested

VARTAN OSKANIAN STATES ARMENIA READY TO ACCEPT PRINCIPLES SUGGESTED BY OSCE MG AND CONTINUE
NEGOTIATIONS WITH AZERBAIJAN

AZG Armenian Daily #133, 18/07/2006

Opinion

The statement by OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairmen on Nagorno Karabakh
conflict settlement principles was not completely unexpected for
Armenia, said at the July 14 press conference RA Foreign Minister
Vartan Oskanian.

Certainly, Armenia was aware of the intention to disclose the Content,
he said. In general, the statement will help to start objective
discussions in the Armenian society, said Mr. Oskanian. He said that he
has neutral attitude to the statement and to the conflict settlement
principles. He added that he has no intention to persuade anyone to
accept them, as Azerbaijan has not accepted them in its turn. "If
the terms were ideal for Armenia, I would be the first person to
start persuading everyone to accept those terms," he said. Anyway
the document is not a perfect one, but it represents a balanced
combination of mutual compromises, which could become a good ground
for further negotiations between the conflict sides.

In response to the question about the probable meeting of Ilham
Aliev and Robert Kocharian, he said that this issue will discussed
during the visit of Minsk Group Co-Chairman Matthew Bryza. He also
said he cannot give any certain information about the coming visit of
Bryza. Mr. Oskanian also commented on the reports about contradictory
statements by the two OSCE Co-Chairmen and the contradictions
between the positions of Armenia and Karabakh on the abovementioned
statement. He said that the settlement terms are acceptable for
Armenia in general.

Mr. Oskanian said emphasized that Armenia will express its official
position on the matter during Matthew Bryza’s visit to Armenia. Most
of the principles are not convenient for Armenia, as the necessity of
accepting them cannot be so easily explained. Nevertheless Armenia
is ready to accept the principles suggested by the Minsk group and
renew negotiations with Azerbaijan.

By Nana Petrosian

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Grange hears from Peace Corps volunteers

Grange hears from Peace Corps volunteers

Evening Observer, NY
July 17 2006

7/18/2006 – FALCONER – Peace Corps volunteers Jason and Terra Sprague
presented the program at a recent Ross Grange meeting.

The former area residents are serving in Armenia, formerly part of
the Soviet Union. They are involved in the Gavar school for special
children. It is the only one of its kind in the country. They showed
pictures of the washing machine installed with the help of Ross
members’ donations.

The school has nearly 100 special children and will have about
25 more next year. Women were doing the laundry by hand, so were
very appreciative of the gift. The Armenian people are especially
interested in education and pictures and lifestyle were discussed.
The Spragues have spent two years in the Peace Corps and will return
to Armenia for one more year.

Hazel Porter, Ross treasurer, presented a $1,000 check for use in a
special project to Mr. Sprague. She also presented a check for $500
to Mary Jane Griffith and Laurene Rice, representing the Ellington
Farman Free Library. A similar gift has been given to Falconer,
Fluvanna and Sinclairville public libraries.

Members are planning a display booth at the Chautauqua County Fair,
July 24 to 30 in Dunkirk. The committee shared ideas and specific
needs with others.

Officers were recently elected, with installation of new officers
at the Aug. 14 meeting. Marlyn Griffith, community service chairman,
asked volunteer hours be turned in to her by that date. Blood pressures
will be taken before the meeting and those attending should bring

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

RA Ministry Awards Participants of "Golden Apricot" Film Festival wi

RA CULTURE MINISTRY AWARDS PARTICIPANTS OF "GOLDEN APRICOT" FILM FESTIVAL WITH MEDALS

AZG Armenian Daily #133, 18/07/2006

On Satruday, RA Culture Minister Hasmik Poghosian awarded several well
known foreign film directors with golden medals for their cooperation
with the third "Golden Apricot" international film festival and with
the Armenian film directors. In particular, Tonino Guerra (Italy),
Godfrey Regio(USA), Krzsystof Zanussi(Poland), and Kin Don Khoh (North
Korea) received the medals. Mrs. Poghosian stated in her speech that
not everyone can be a genuine man of art, but those who can really
create art and present their art to millions of people make great
contribution to the cultures of their countries and nations.

The film directors awarded with medals gave various estimation to the
gold medals they received. Thus, Mr. Guerra stated that that was the
second award he received in Armenia, as the first one he received for
his friendship and cooperation with Sergey Parajanov, great Armenian
film director. He said as a joke that he is twice happy. In his turn,
Mr. Zanussi, who greatly contributed to popularization of Parajanov’s
"The Colour of Pomegranates" in Europe, expressed hope that he will
never become a persona non grata. Mr. Kin don Khon and Mr. Godfrey
Regio stated that they will continue cooperating with Armenia in the
future too.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Serge Sargsian States Nagorno Karabakh Had Self-Determined Long Ago

SERGE SARGSIAN STATES NAGORNO KARABAKH HAD SELF-DETERMINED LONG AGO

AZG Armenian Daily #133,
18/07/2006
Opinion

RA Defence Minister Serge Sargsian excludes holding of double
referendum in NKR in coming future. He said this at a press
conference. He added that the referendum may take place only in
case OSCE MG co-chairs or other mediators suggest that and the
international organizations are ready to acknowledge the results of
the referendum. At the same time he emphasized that the referendum
political self-determination in NKR took place long ago.

As for the latest developments is Lebanon, he said that the situation
shaping around the conflict between Lebanon and Israel is dangerous
for the whole region.

"But we can do almost nothing in this case," he said.

By Nana Petrosian

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

New Insight Liberated Territories

NEW INSIGHT LIBERATED TERRITORIES

Lragir.am
17 July 06

Even the legal definition of the territories controlled by NKR is
doubted. What is more, not only by foreigners but also ourselves.
Maps are published in Armenia, where the liberated territories are
marked with a different color. On other maps Kashatagh and Karvachar
are marked with the same color as Armenia and Karabakh. This means
that the Armenian reality lacks a common, real attitude towards these
territories. The Armenian refugees presented their point of view on
these territories. They proposed president Aliyev recognizing these
territories as compensation to Armenian refugees. Arman Melikyan,
adviser to the NKR president, says 500 thousand Armenian refugees
comprised 8 percent of the population of Soviet Azerbaijan, and
they can claim to 12 thousand square km from 150 thousand square km
legally belonging to Azerbaijan. "Hence, it is not serious to consider
returning lands," said Arman Melikyan.

Sanasar Saryan, chair of Karabakh Refugees NGO, told us in an interview
that the approach of the international community towards the problem
of refugees is not equal. The rights, possible return, compensation to
Armenian refugees is not included in any document. And the refugees
living in Karabakh have not received any compensation. So far no
international organization has attended to the problem of Armenian
refugees, said Sanasar Saryan.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress