PRESS RELEASE
Council of Europe Press Division
Ref: 566a06
Tel: +33 (0)3 88 41 25 60
Fax:+33 (0)3 88 41 39 11
[email protected]
internet:
“Victims: place, rights and assistance” on the agenda of the 27th
Conference of European Ministers of Justice in Yerevan
Strasbourg, 09.10.2006 – The Ministers of Justice of the Council of
Europe’s 46 member States will meet in Yerevan (Armenia) on 12 and 13
October to find new ways of promoting and developing support and
assistance to victims, facilitating their access to justice and ensuring
that victims of crime do not also become victims of administrative
procedures and bureaucracy.
The President of Armenia, Robert Kocharian, and the Council of Europe’s
Director General of Legal Affairs, Guy de Vel, will address the
participants when the conference opens on Thursday 12 October at 9 am
(the meeting will be open to the press until 10.30 am).
During the conference, the ministers present will sign a number of
Council of Europe treaties.
The increasing rate of criminality as well as the threat and the acts of
terrorism demonstrate the need for member States to promote the
individual’s security and dignity and respond to violence by devising
and implementing social and judicial measures to assist the victims.
The conference will provide an opportunity to review existing standards
and practices in the member countries, as well as any shortcomings in
them or their implementation, and identify needs for additional
instruments.
The Council of Europe adopted a new recommendation on assistance to
crime victims (Rec (2006) 8
<(200 6)8&Sector=3DsecCM&Language=3DlanEnglish&a mp;Ver=3Doriginal&BackColorInternet=3D9999CC&a mp;BackColorIntranet=3DFFBB55&BackColorLogged= 3DFFAC75> ) in June 2006. The Council of Europe
has long regarded aid for victims as a priority, having adopted a
Convention on the compensation of victims of violent crimes
< n/QueVoulezVous.asp?NT=3D116&CM=3D8&DF=3D9 /27/2006&CL=3DENG> in 1983 and the Convention on the
prevention of terrorism
< mmun/QueVoulezVous.asp?NT=3D196&CM=3D8&DF= 3D9/27/2006&CL=3DENG> and the Convention on action against
trafficking in human beings
< n/QueVoulezVous.asp?NT=3D197&CM=3D8&DF=3D9 /27/2006&CL=3DENG> in 2005.
A press conference will be held on Friday 13 October at 12.15 pm (House
of Government, 47 Mashtots Avenue).
Journalists are invited to obtain accreditation from Anahit Voskanyan,
Armenian Ministry of Justice, tél. +374 10 582 581, fax +374 10 582
157, e-mail [email protected]
For further information on the conference, consult
Press contact:
Estelle Steiner, Press officer, Council of Europe
Tel. +33 (0)3 88 41 33 35, mobile +33 (0)6 08 46 01 57,
[email protected]
To receive our press releases by e-mail, contact :
[email protected]
A political organisation set up in 1949, the Council of Europe works to
promote democracy and human rights continent-wide. It also develops
common responses to social, cultural and legal challenges in its 46
member states.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Author: Emil Lazarian
Haigazian University Acknowledges New Donations
Haigazian University
From: Mira Yardemian
Public Relations Director
Rue Mexique – Kantari
P.O. Box 11-1748
Riad El-Solh 1107 2090
Beirut – Lebanon
Haigazian University Acknowledges New Donations
After a stormy summer in Lebanon, and as the academic year
2006-2007 starts, President Paul Haidostian acknowledged with thanks a
number of US grants received during the past month (Lincy Foundation USA,
$100,000/- ; USAID Small Grants, Lebanon $50,000/- ; the Flora Family
Foundation, USA $10,000/-) to various programs of Haigazian University.
Theses grants came as a welcome addition to the regular
financial support of the American Missionary Association of America, the
Stephen Philibosian Foundation, the Conte Foundation, and the Common Global
Ministries Board of the United Church of Christ & Christian Church
(Disciples of Christ) USA.
Moreover, Haidostian commended the scholarship programs of the
Galouste Gulbenkian Foundation, and the Vatche & Tamar Manouguian
Foundation which continuously support Armenian students through direct grants.
Despite all the aforementioned generous donations, President
Haidostian expressed the country’s economic hardships and the increasing
financial needs of students and the university, as a consequence of the
July-August war on Lebanon.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
HAAF Toronto: Opening of school for Madaghis Village by Baroness Cox
PRESS RELEASE
“Hayastan” All-Armenian Fund, Toronto
280 Sheppard Avenue East, Suite 215,
Toronto, Ontario, M2N 3B1, Canada
Contact : Migirdic Migirdicyan
Tel: (416) 332 0787
Fax: (416) 332 0736
e-mail : [email protected]
All-Armenian Fund Toronto – The Opening of the school for Madaghis
Village by Baroness Caroline Cox.
October 9, 2006 Toronto, ON – On Wednesday, September 27th, Hayastan
All-Armenian Fund Toronto Chapter opened another school in Karabagh,
this one for the village of Madaghis. Officials from the
Nagorno-Karabagh Republic, a group of Toronto Armenians, Yerevan,
Stepanakert and Toronto representatives of the All-Armenian Fund, Mrs.
Nora Kasparian; the principle of the school, teachers, students,
villagers and Baroness Caroline Cox, the Deputy Speaker of the House of
Lords participated in the opening ceremonies. Baroness Cox who had flown
in specifically for this opening gave a very moving speech and
congratulated the villagers and the students alike for this great
occasion. The honour of cutting the ribbon was given to Baroness Cox who
was accompanied by two grade 1 students.
The school which has been built for 150 students, has 11 classrooms, a
computer room, the principle’s office, the teachers’ office, a medical
room, a library and a function hall.
For additional information or a sample copy, please contact:
“Hayastan” All-Armenian Fund, Toronto
280 Sheppard Avenue East, Suite 215,
Toronto, Ontario, M2N 3B1, Canada
Contact : Migirdic Migirdicyan
Tel: (416) 332 0787
Fax: (416) 332 0736
e-mail : [email protected]
Hayastan Foundation Canada Inc. – “Hayastan” All-Armenian Fund is a
charitable organization, realizing humanitarian projects in Armenia and
Artsakh. During the last thirteen years, it has undertaken and
successfully completed numerous winter heating, water distribution,
gasification and school construction projects.
"Armenia Will Be A Stronger Country If It Holds Democratic Elections
“ARMENIA WILL BE A STRONGER COUNTRY IF IT HOLDS DEMOCRATIC ELECTIONS”
MEDIAMAX armenian news agency
15.09.06
Weekly Analytical Report
Exclusive interview of U.S. Ambassador to Armenia John Evans to
Mediamax agency U.S. Ambassador John Evans completed his diplomatic
mission in Armenia.
Before his departure on September 10 he gave a farewell interview
to Mediamax.
– Mr. Evans, what do you consider to be your greatest achievement
during your service in Armenia?
– I think we achieved a lot. The conclusion of the Millenium Challenge
Compact that was signed at the end of March 2006 is probably the
biggest achievement. But as I have already said before, the work of
diplomacy is like gardening – it takes persistence and patience. And
we have had that kind of approach – we didn’t simply make a list of
things to achieve.
We have greater cooperation with Armenia in security and defense
matters.
It’s not only the question of the Armenian non-combatant contingent
that’s serving in Iraq, but also cooperation in the framework of
NATO. And I think we have also seen some progress in the strengthening
of democratic institutions.
I do think that the recent events – murders of officials and attacks
on journalists – are not a good sign. At the moment I am quite worried
about that. Journalists need to be protected as they carry out a very
crucial function in any democratic system.
– And what was your biggest disappointment during your work in Armenia?
– In general, I am not disappointed by my time here. The only thing
that would fit into the category you mentioned is the disappointment I
had when the constitutional referendum held in Armenia last November
apparently was not conducted in a totally honest way. I had had
very clear assurances from some very highly placed members of the
Armenian government. They assured me, crossing their heart, that there
would be no such falsifications. And I went out on a limb and took
a personal risk in supporting the substance of the constitutional
amendments. I did that because I felt that the Armenian people had
a right to know what the United States, as well as the European
Union, Council of Europe and the OSCE, thought about the content
of those amendments. So I took the risk, and I was criticized for
supporting those amendments. So I was very disappointed in the end
that apparently, and again nothing has been proven, but apparently
there was a falsification of the vote count.
– Last year you said in an interview to our agency, that “The lesson
of some other elections in this region ought to be clear to anyone
tempted to falsify election results: the people are not stupid,
and they will figure it out, and that will create a big problem,
fraught with great risks”.
What is your opinion on whether there are still many people in Armenia
who might have such a temptation during the elections in 2007 and 2008?
– Recent polling results that we have access to, conducted in Armenia
by the Gallup Organization, indicate that there is a lot of skepticism
about next year’s elections. I think that Armenia is headed in the
right direction, and one day or another, sooner or later, Armenia
will become a true democratic country. We believe that Armenia will
be a stronger country if it holds democratic elections, which are
the key to the legitimacy of the elected officials.
A year ago we were advised not to waste any more money on working with
Armenian political parties. But we went against the experts’ advice,
because we were not ready to give up on Armenian democracy. And I am
still not ready to give up. I think there are many people who do want
to see the elections be free and fair. They see the advantages of this
to Armenia–a country with no oil wealth and no hydrocarbons–but a
country that needs to preserve the respect of the democratic world,
the Western world, and needs to meet its own commitments to the Council
of Europe and to the OSCE. It’s a question of Armenia’s self-respect,
but it’s also a question of the respect of the world.
– Some U.S. experts are of the opinion that the power of the Armenian
Diaspora in the USA limits the opportunities of the United States to
encourage democratic changes in Armenia, as the Diaspora oppose any
criticism of the Armenian authorities from Washington. Do you agree
with such point of view?
– I do not. I think the opposite. I think the Armenian-American
community in various ways has a very positive impact on development
here. Of course, there is a certain sensitivity about open criticism,
but I have heard a lot of criticism precisely from Armenian-Americans,
who are disappointed that Armenia has not moved quickly enough towards
becoming a full-fledged democracy. So, I take the opposite view. I
think that Armenia’s international connections, not only with the
United States, but with France, with Russia, with other countries, are
one of the preconditions for building a strong democracy in Armenia.
– Despite the numerous efforts of the United States, Armenian-Turkish
relations are not normalized and the border remains closed. Do you
see any possibility for achieving some progress?
– Turkey is an ally of the United States, and I understand very well
the complications that Armenia has with its Turkish neighbors at the
moment. I do hope that wise people on the both sides of the border
will come to see the mutual advantages of trade across the border,
of cooperating on energy issues – Eastern Turkey is short of energy
and Armenia might be able to help in this regard.
I believe that diplomatic relations should be established between
Yerevan and Ankara. This is not an easy area, but the commonsense,
good judgment, and wisdom of people on both sides needs to be brought
to bear on this problem.
– This year the issue of providing for Armenia’s energy security
became a topic for active discussions. What kind of support can the
United States provide in this regard? In particular, U.S. Deputy
Assistant Secretary Daniel Fried, who visited Armenia this March,
said that Armenia’s desire to have a new nuclear power plant will be
seriously discussed in Washington.
– First of all, I would say that we have already helped a great deal
in studying the problem. We have worked very closely with the Ministry
of Energy. There was a conference in July about the least-cost option,
which the Ministry is discussing. There will be another conference,
I believe, in October to discuss this. But, the United States will
need to know a lot more about Armenia’s plans for its energy security
before any kind of discussion can happen about the future of nuclear
energy capacity. We see that the Metsamor reactor is coming to
the end of its useful life and should be decommissioned in 2015 or
2016. That is going to be an expensive process and we believe that
Armenia needs to plan now, if not already yesterday, for how it is
going to manage the expense of decommissioning the existing plant,
not to mention the enormous expense of building a follow-on plant.
– This year much has been said about the existing “window
of possibilities” for the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict. What is your opinion, has the window closed, or are there
still some hopes?
– As you know, I am not in the lead on this issue. Rather, Matthew
Bryza, the OSCE Minsk Co- Chair representing the United States,
is working on this. I will say that I think it was a very good
development that the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs decided this June
to make public the main elements of their discussions with the
sides so that the Armenian and Azerbaijani societies could discuss
these elements, think about them and decide what their attitude is
towards those elements. I think what they will find on both sides
is that the deal that was on the table, and is still on the table,
is really the best possible, most fair and long-lasting settlement
that can be reached. Another conflict in the South Caucasus would
be a disaster for both sides. It would undoubtedly be inconclusive,
it would cause more suffering, and it would set back the entire
region. Both sides need to think very hard about the way forward,
and try to find a peaceful settlement so that the entire region can
join the rest of the world in prosperity, stability, and peace.
Turkey And Europe: The Dangers Of Divorce
TURKEY AND EUROPE: THE DANGERS OF DIVORCE
By Patrick Seale Special to Gulf News
Gulf News, United Arab Emirates
Oct 9 2006
The European Union is in danger of making a mistake of immense
strategic importance: instead of welcoming Turkey into its ranks it
is rebuffing it.
At the very moment when the West is in a mood of profound alienation
from the Arab and Muslim world – based largely on ignorance, prejudice
and mutual incomprehension – Europe is turning its back on the one
country uniquely able to serve as a bridge between East and West.
At the very moment when the Middle East is experiencing crises and
wars of unprecedented gravity, which threaten to overspill into
neighbouring countries and into Europe itself, Europe has failed to
grasp that Turkey could provide a key to regional security.
Turkey, heir to the Ottoman Empire and a founding member of Nato,
is a major regional power – dynamic, yet traditional; secular, yet
Muslim; democratic yet militarily powerful. Its ties with Europe are
centuries old. As its Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul likes to recall,
Turkey sent its first diplomatic envoy to France in 1495, while France
chose Istanbul as the site of its very first foreign embassy in the
16th century.
Today, Turkey could play a key role in stabilising Iraq and in helping
to mediate the Arab-Israeli conflict, since it is on good terms with
both sides. It has again demonstrated its commitment to regional
security by sending a thousand soldiers to help keep the peace in
southern Lebanon.
On November 9, the European Commission is due to publish a report on
its negotiations with Turkey over the past year, and on the progress
Turkey has made in carrying out the reforms Europe has demanded.
There are grave fears that this crucial report, which will set the
tone of future relations between the EU and Turkey, will be negative.
Instead of acknowledging Turkey’s very considerable efforts to meet
European norms and adopt European values – instead of looking forward
to Turkey’s great potential contribution to Europe’s security and
stability – it is likely to emphasise areas of continued disagreement,
demand still more concessions from Ankara and put the blame on Turkey
for the current stalemate.
Bad situation
So bad is the situation that many observers believe relations between
Turkey and Europe are heading for a breakdown. If these fears are
proved correct – if the commission’s report is indeed hard on Turkey –
European diplomacy will have suffered a considerable defeat.
The EU’s grudging attitude towards Turkish membership has already
created an anti-European backlash in Turkey, while at the same time
encouraging reactionary right-wing forces in Europe, especially in
Austria, Germany and France, to call for a suspension of negotiations
with Turkey.
One major subject of disagreement concerns the Mediterranean island
of Cyprus, divided between Greeks and Turks. The Greek part – the
Republic of Cyprus – is an EU member state, while the Turkish northern
part has not been recognised as a separate republic and suffers from
a commercial boycott.
The EU is demanding that Turkey open its ports and airports to the
Republic of Cyprus, which Ankara is obliged to do under its customs
agreement with the EU. But Ankara is refusing to comply until the EU
ends its commercial boycott of the Turkish part of the island – which
the EU promised to do so, but has so far not done. The outstanding
issue, therefore, would seem to be one of reciprocity. Fairness and
natural justice would suggest that the Turks have a point.
Moreover, Turkish Cypriots voted in favour of a plan put forward by
UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan for the unification of the island,
whereas Greek Cypriots voted against. This, once again, would seem to
give the Turks the moral advantage. It should not be beyond the wit
of European diplomacy to find a solution to this heated but relatively
trivial dispute.
Another difficult hurdle Turkey faces is its historic responsibility
for the massacre of well over one million Armenians in 1915 during
the First World War, when the Ottoman Empire, then in its last years,
was engaged in a struggle with the western powers and czarist Russia.
The Turks feared the Armenians were a fifth column, allied to Russia.
This may go some way to explain, although it cannot justify, the
atrocities the Armenians suffered. Many were slaughtered while hundreds
of thousands died when they were mercilessly driven out of Anatolia,
the remnants of this death march eventually finding refuge in Syria
and Lebanon.
The EU would like Turkey to recognise this genocide, although it has
not made it a specific condition for membership. However, on a visit
this month to the Armenian capital of Yerevan, France’s President
Jacques Chirac declared that “France recognises the Armenian genocide”.
When asked whether Turkey should do so as a condition for EU
membership, he replied: “In all honesty, I believe so. Any country
is enhanced by recognising its dramas and mistakes.” He drew the
comparison with Germany which, to its credit, made amends for the
Holocaust.
Turkey has proposed setting up a committee of Turkish and Armenian
historians, which could include historians from other countries, to
examine the tragic events of 1915. It has committed itself to accept
its conclusions and to respond accordingly.
But whether this will be sufficient to persuade a deeply divided Europe
to accept Turkey as a full member must unfortunately remain in doubt.
Patrick Seale is a commentator and author of several books on Middle
East affairs.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Turkey "Threatens" France
TURKEY “THREATENS” FRANCE
Public Radio, Armenia
Oct 7 2006
Spokesman of the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs Namik Tan
told the journalists that in case the French Parliament adopts draft
criminalizing the denial of the Armenian Genocide, Ankara “will hardly
be able to control” the counteraction of the Turkish society.
According to the Turkish “Zaman,” Namik Tan confessed that Ankara is
seriously concerned with the inclusion of the draft law in the agenda.
Noting that in the past the Armenian question was also poisoning
French-Turkish relations. Tan said that the current bill will become
a serious blow to the relations between the two countries and the
success achieved in the past. Tan said that with adoption of the bill,
“France will abolish the freedom of speech.”
Namik Tan expressed the hope that France will be reasonable enough
not to adopt the bill jeopardizing Turkish-French relations.
The Spokesman said also that the leadership of his country is making
every effort to prevent adoption of the bill. “October 4 President
Ahmed Sezer sent a letter to Jacques Chirac, Prime Minister Rejeb
Tayyib Erdogan will have a meeting with French businessmen in Istanbul,
Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul had a telephone conversation with the
Foreign Minister of France,” said Spokesman of the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs of Turkey.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Foreign Ministers Of Armenia And Azerbaijan Met In Moscow
FOREIGN MINISTERS OF ARMENIA AND AZERBAIJAN MET IN MOSCOW
Public Radio, Armenia
Oct 7 2006
Under the auspices of the Minsk Group Co-Chairs, October 6 in Moscow
RA Minister of Foreign Affairs Vardan Oskanian participated in
consultations with the Foreign Minister of Azerbaijan. In a day-long
meeting at the Russian Foreign Ministry, the Ministers assessed
the current situation, identified the problematic issues still in
dispute, and heard the Co-Chairs’ ideas as to how to overcome those
differences. Minister Oskanian said the Armenian side has taken note
of the discussion, which he characterized as food for thought and said
they would receive serious consideration prior to the next meeting
before the end of the month.
In the framework of the Minsk Group meeting, Russian Minister
of Foreign Affairs Sergei Lavrov received Minister Oskanian. The
bilateral meeting between the two ministers began with a discussion
on the negotiations and the situation surrounding Nagorno Karabakh.
They also discussed recent developments in the South Caucasus and
possible outcomes. Minister Oskanian and Minister Lavrov also explored
other bilateral issues.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Russia And Georgia Should Prove Friendship With Armenia In Deed
RUSSIA AND GEORGIA SHOULD PROVE FRIENDSHIP WITH ARMENIA IN DEED
PanARMENIAN.Net
09.10.2006 14:54 GMT+04:00
/PanARMENIAN.Net/ “One thing is clear: both Russia and Georgia should
do the utmost to alleviate tension and prevent any impact on Armenia,”
Armenian National Assembly Speaker Tigran Torosian told reporters
on Monday. “Otherwise the assurances of friendship will remain
mere words,” Torosian said adding that “words should be proved in
deed.” “It’s another matter what should be done for it. Russia and
Georgia should consider the problem first of all,” the Speaker said.
Tigran Torosian thinks use of Armenian interparliamentary ties for the
settlement of the Georgian-Russian collision unlikely. “The tension
between the states has deepened and resolution of the problem depends
on Russia and Georgia only,” he said.
“Maybe something can be done within international organizations,
the OSCE for example, but the situation depends on the leaders of
the two states,” he said.
Tigran Torosian also informed that the Russian-Georgian relations
may be considered at the sitting of the PACE Monitoring Committee on
October 16 in Yerevan. “It will help the committee members to have
a proper notion of the issue, since representatives of many states
are not well informed of the problem,” Torosian said, reported
newsarmenia.ru.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Turquie: Manifestations Contre Projet Loi Francais Sur Le Genocide A
TURQUIE: MANIFESTATIONS CONTRE PROJET LOI FRANCAIS SUR LE GENOCIDE ARMENIEN
Agence France Presse
8 octobre 2006 dimanche 2:46 PM GMT
Quelque 500 personnes ont manifeste dimanche contre le projet de loi
francais prevoyant une peine de prison pour la negation de caractère
genocidaire des massacres d’Armeniens pendant la Première Guerre
mondiale.
La foule — des militants d’un petit parti de gauche — a defile en
direction du consulat de France situe dans le centre d’Istanbul mais
a ete immobilisee par les vehicules blindes de la police anti-emeutes
avant d’acceder aux abords du consulat.
Seuls quelques manifestants ont ete autorises a poursuivre la marche
et a derouler devant le consulat des banderoles clamant “France stop!
Le boycott arrive” et “Le genocide est un mensonge”.
Le projet de loi qui doit etre examine jeudi par le Parlement francais
prevoit cinq ans de prison et une forte amende pour quiconque nierait
que les Armeniens ont ete victimes d’un genocide sous l’Empire ottoman.
Le ministre turc des Affaires etrangères a prevenu la France qu’elle
risquait de voir sa participation aux principaux projets economiques
en Turquie ecartee si elle adoptait cette loi.
La France a deja adopte en 2001 une resolution qualifiant de genocide
les massacres d’Armeniens, ce qui avait amene la Turquie, par mesure
de retorsion, a ecarter les entreprises francaises des appels d’offres
publics et a annuler plusieurs projets attribues a des entreprises
francaises.
Selon les Armeniens, 1,5 million des leurs ont ete tues dans des
massacres organises de 1915 a 1917.
La Turquie rejette categoriquement le qualificatif de genocide,
affirmant que 300.000 Armeniens et au moins autant de Turcs ont
trouve la mort au cours de troubles internes dus a des soulèvements
d’Armeniens independantistes soutenus par les envahisseurs russes
dans l’est de la Turquie, alors que l’empire ottoman se desintegrait.
–Boundary_(ID_xSIA+fOM3F+Y3ZRwDDMR uA)–
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
ANKARA: Turkish PM To France: ‘Will You Arrest Me If I Reject Armeni
TURKISH PM TO FRANCE: ‘WILL YOU ARREST ME IF I REJECT ARMENIAN GENOCIDE CLAIMS?’
Journal of Turkish Weekly
Oct 8 2006
ISTANBUL and ANKARA – Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan met
with French businessmen on Saturday to discuss the so-called Armenian
Genocide issue and continued to raise his objections against the
“Armenian Genocide” bill in France.
Erdogan said that as a third party France had no right to make
decisions over a war between two nations in the past, and added:
“How can this issue ever be relevant to France? Mind your own
business!”
Erdogan asked what France’s attitude would be if he, or one of his
ministers, rejected the alleged Armenian Genocide in France and
continued:
“Will you arrest us and send us to prison? Do you have the power to
do that?”
Erdogan said intimate relations between countries should not be
sacrificed for this kind of issue and added: “Turkey is not a tribal
country. You cannot conduct these kinds of operations concerning our
country. France has made a great mistake.”
The Turkish PM asserted this issue should be discussed by historians,
lawyers, art historians and scientists, and added there should be no
restrictions to discuss the issue.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress