Nagorno Karabakh conflict discussed at Euronest Parliamentary Assembly’s POL Committee – Armenian MP

Save

Share

 12:54, 22 February, 2022

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 22, ARMENPRESS. The Security in the South Caucasus topic was included in the agenda of the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly’s Committee on Political Affairs, Human Rights and Democracy, within the frames of which the Nagorno Karabakh conflict was discussed, Head of the Armenian parliamentary delegation at the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly Maria Karapetyan told reporters at a briefing today.

“This morning the Nagorno Karabakh conflict was also discussed. Experts joined us online. The Armenian expert was in attendance, and one expert from Azerbaijan joined online. After that the Armenian lawmakers, almost the whole delegation, and the Azerbaijani lawmakers, exchanged views.

Our European partners expressed their positions. Here I would like to highlight the position of European Parliament’s representative in the South Caucasus Marina Kaljurand. Today she once again reaffirmed that war is not a means of resolving a conflict and that the Nagorno Karabakh conflict still must get its complete, comprehensive, negotiated and peaceful solution”, Karapetyan said.

Return of Armenian POWs from Azerbaijan raised during Euronest PA’s Committee meeting

Save

Share

 13:03, 22 February, 2022

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 22, ARMENPRESS. The issue of returning Armenian prisoners of war from Azerbaijan was raised during the discussion of the topic on the security in the South Caucasus at the meeting of the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly’s Committee on Political Affairs, Human Rights and Democracy in Yerevan, Head of the Armenian parliamentary delegation at the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly Maria Karapetyan told reporters at a briefing today.

Asked whether this issue, or a resolution or any kind of decision relating to the Armenian POWs are expected on the sidelines of the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly, the lawmaker said: “The Euronest Parliamentary Assembly doesn’t suppose such a format, but, of course, the lawmakers raised that issue during the debate on the topic of the security in the South Caucasus. In general, the sessions of these committees conduct a preliminary debate of drafts similar to our parliament. The resolutions of the political, energy, security and social committees are still in the form of drafts, they are currently being debated, but I would like to note that they do not have a context of conflict”, she said.

Turkey envoy discusses normalization with Armenia with Patriarch Sahak II

Public Radio of Armenia
Feb 23 2022

Turkey-Armenia Special Representative for normalization with Armenia, Ambassador Serdar Kilic paid a courtesy visit to the Armenian Patriarchate on Tuesday, February 22, and met with His Beatitude Patriarch Sahak II.

During the meeting, the Ambassador expressed his satisfaction with the first meetings with the representative of Armenia, Ruben Rubinyan, and expressed hope that “the solid steps to be taken in the normalization process will pave the way for positive developments between the two countries.”

His Beatitude the Patriarch emphasized that they support the normalization of Turkey-Armenia relations, and that the good neighborly relations that will be reached in the end will provide an environment of peace and tranquility not only for the people of the two countries, but also for the countries in the region, and will lead to regional economic, social and cultural developments.

Ambassador Serdar Kilic thanked the Patriarch for providing the opportunity for the meeting.

Asbarez: ‘Artsakh Is a U.S. Humanitarian Aid Desert,’ Says ANCA

The ANCA has launched an online advocacy campaign to increase US aid to Artsakh

No new U.S. aid to Artsakh despite ongoing Azerbaijani aggression

WASHINGTON—The Armenian National Committee of America has expanded grassroots calls to grow U.S. aid to Artsakh and cut military assistance to Azerbaijan, in the face of ongoing anti-Armenian aggression by President Aliyev’s regime and the humanitarian and economic crisis facing over 100,000 Armenians displaced by Azerbaijan and Turkey’s 2020 attack on Artsakh.

“Artsakh remains a US humanitarian aid desert – with only meager USAID help for Armenian refugees forced from Artsakh into Armenia and almost no aid at all for those who remain,” said ANCA Executive Director Aram Hamparian.  “It’s long past time for the Biden Administration and Congress to provide meaningful assistance to address the urgent needs for housing, food, water security, healthcare, and demining/UXO needs in Artsakh.”

The ANCA has launched an online advocacy campaign urging Congressional leaders crafting the Fiscal Year 2023 Foreign Aid Bill to ensure:

— Not less than $100,000,000 to provide urgently-needed direct U.S. humanitarian and developmental aid to the more than 100,000 Armenians ethnically cleansed by Azerbaijan from their Artsakh homeland, helping these families rebuild their lives and resettle in safety upon their indigenous Armenian homeland.

— None of the funds appropriated under the FY23 State-Foreign Operations bill shall be provided to Azerbaijan for military or security programs, including – but not limited to – Section 333 (Capacity Building), Foreign Military Financing, and International Military Education and Training.

—Not less than $100,000,000 to strengthen Armenia’s security and sovereignty against continued Azerbaijani aggression, incursions, and occupation.

The ANCA’s call comes as the Human Rights Defenders of Armenia and Artsakh, Arman Tatoyan and Gegham Stepanyan respectively, continue to raise alarm bells about ongoing Azerbaijani aggression against Artsakh border villages, calling special attention to the situation in Martuni’s Karmir Shuka and Taghavard villages.  Water security issues have been reported in near the village Aghavno, where armed Azerbaijani servicemen slaughtered and disposed of cattle remains, poisoning the water. Water security issues are also reported in Armenia’s Gegharkunik and Syunik regions.

In September, 2021, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), in a response to inquiries by Rep. Judy Chu (D-CA), reported that it has provided just $2.5 million for displaced Artsakh Armenians who have sought refuge in Armenia.  According to USAID, some $4.5 million has been provided in “new and repurposed assistance to respond to the complex humanitarian crisis resulting from the NK hostilities and the conflict-associated COVID-19 resurgence in Armenia.”  Those funds likely include support for Azerbaijan, which, along with Turkey, launched its attacks against Armenia and Artsakh in 2020. While there are reports of continued low-level de-mining assistance to Artsakh, no significant funds addressing the serious food, water, and housing needs of displaced Armenians in Armenia or Artsakh have been allocated or distributed.

Meanwhile, $120 million in U.S. military assistance to Azerbaijan continues, even as Azerbaijan expanded its ties with Russia this week, signing a joint declaration on bilateral “allied cooperation.” “The Russian Federation and the Republic of Azerbaijan build their relations on the basis of allied interaction, mutual respect for independence, state sovereignty, territorial integrity and inviolability of the borders of the two countries,” reads their joint declaration.  Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty is reporting that the seven-page declaration, “says that the two sides will not only step up Russian-Azerbaijani military cooperation but may also “consider the possibility of providing each other with military assistance.”

Asbarez: Pan-Armenian Council Hosts Farewell Reception for Consul General Baibourtian

Members of the Pan-Armenian Council with Consul General Ambassador Armen Baibourtian

GLENDALE— A capacity audience gathered at the invitation of the Pan-Armenian Council of the Western United States on February 15 to honor the distinguished career of Dr. Armen Baibourtian, Consul General of Armenia to Los Angeles.

Attorney Garo Ghazarian, the master of ceremonies, highlighted the vision of the PAC-WUSA: a forum to address concerns and provide a unified voice to the community. He then praised the evening’s honoree for his unwavering support for our Community, and for empowering PAC’s service to the community – from organizing the over 100,000 people strong protest against the Azerbaijani aggression on Artsakh and Armenia, to the fundraising of over $1,500,000.00 to aid the Armenian community of Lebanon.

The head table at the event Ambassador Armen Baibourtian with his family

Following Ghazarian’s remarks, members of the clergy presented the invocation. Thereafter, the staff of the Consul General were acknowledged and thanked for their dedicated service. Ghazarian also recognized Yvette Baibourtian, the wife of the Consul General, for her steadfast support of Dr. Baibourtian and her service to the Armenian community.

Lena Bozoyan, the moderator of the PAC-WUSA, expressed her deep gratitude to Dr. Baibourtian for his exceptional, decades-long, public service to the Armenian people, most notably during the immense recent challenges wrought on Artsakh and Armenia during the devastating 44 day war and its aftermath during the global Coronavirus pandemic. Ms. Bozoyan spoke of Dr. Baibourtian’s impeccable integrity, great humbleness and his willingness to work closely with all of the various organizations of our community.

The audience then heard from Arch. Hovnan Derderian of the Western Diocese of the Armenian Church of North America, Bishop Torkom Donoyan of the Western Prelacy of the Armenian Apostolic Church of America, Monsignor Parsegh Baghdassarian of the Armenian Catholic Church, Very Rev. Henrik Shahnazarian of the Armenian Evangelical Union of North America and Arch. Barkev Mardirossian. Each religious leader praised Dr. Baibourtian’s compassionate leadership of the Armenian community and his service to our people, zealously advocating for the advancement of Armenia and all Armenians.

The program continued with Ghazarian highlighting Dr. Baibourtian’s exceptional career, noting that he attained post-graduate degrees at Harvard University, M.I.T, and a Ph.D. from Yerevan State University. Among several other diplomatic posts held, he recalled Dr. Baibourtian’s two tours of duty as Consul General in Los Angeles, and as Armenia’s Ambassador to India.

Attorney Joseph Kanimian, representing the Board of Governors of the House of Armenia, where the Consul General’s office is housed, congratulated Dr. Baibourtian for his many achievements and suggested that this was not an end, but a beginning of continued service to the Armenian people.

During the evening, Dr. Baibourtian received several commendations including from City of Glendale Police Chief Carl Povilitis, and Glendale Mayor, Paula Devine. On behalf of the PAC, Avedik Izmirlian, and Dr. Raffi Balian, each made presentations of gifts to the honoree in recognition of his years of selfless service.

Also recognized was honoree’s spouse, Yvette Baibourtian, who was presented with a gift by PAC members Mayda Kuredjian and Shoushan Baghdabourian.

Finally, Dr. Baibourtian addressed the audience, as he thanked the PAC and the attendees for the touching tribute. He praised the Armenian community of Los Angeles and the PAC-WUSA for being a positive force and an exceptional example of unity for all to follow. He spoke fondly of how the PAC unified the entire community during the 44 day war and answered the call for support to the motherland, providing tremendous inspiration the people in Armenia and Artsakh.

The evening came to a close with representatives of the clergy leading everyone in prayer.

Armenia and Kazakhstan refused to recognize the “LDNR”

The Times HUB
Feb 25 2022
 FEB 25, 2022

Vladimir Putin announced the recognition of «independence» «LDNR» February 21

The issue of recognizing the independence of the Donetsk and Lugansk «republics» not worth it. This was stated by the press secretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia Vahan Hunanyan, Armenpress writes.

«Of course, we want the existing problems between the two friendly states to be resolved through diplomatic dialogue, negotiations, in accordance with the norms and principles of international law and the UN Charter. And we hope that all necessary steps will be taken to reduce tension and peacefully resolve the situation», — he said.

Also about the non-recognition of & # 171; LDNR & # 187; Minister of Foreign Affairs of Kazakhstan Mukhtar Tleuberdi said.

«The official position of Kazakhstan is now being developed, in the next few hours the Security Council of Kazakhstan will be held, at which we will finally accept the official position of Kazakhstan. But I must assure you that the issue of recognition by Kazakhstan of the Donetsk and Luhansk «republics» not worth it. That is, we proceed from the foundations of international law and the basic principles and charters of the UN», — the minister said.

When asked by journalists about sending Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) forces to Donbass, he replied that «military or peacekeeping forces can only be used in the CSTO space».< /p>

Note that Armenia and Kazakhstan are allies of Russia in the CSTO.

UN on recognition of the «LDNR»: Threaten with global consequences

Meanwhile, a number of countries condemned the recognition of «LDNR» Russia. Canada, Germany, Poland, Georgia have declared that they support the territorial integrity of Ukraine.

What Did Trump Actually Say About 1915 Armenians?

Malaysian Digest
Feb 25 2022


At one point approximately a half million Armenia-identifying citizens in Constantinople were deported, massacred, or marched to their deaths as part of a campaign of mass killing by the Ottoman regime during spring 1915.

  • why did the ottoman empire not like armenians?
  • how many armenians were there in 1914?
  • what side were the armenians on in ww1?
  • what happened in the 24th of april?
  • what do armenians do on april 24th?
  • why were the armenians being deported from the ottoman empire?
  • where did the armenians get deported to?
  • what were armenians called in the ottoman empire?
  • how did the armenians attempt to resist the ottomans?
  • did the ottoman empire colonize armenia?
  • why did the ottoman empire invade armenia?
  • what was armenia before 1918?
  • who controlled armenia in 1914?
  • who were armenians?
  • did armenians help russia ww1?
  • which side was armenia on during ww2?
  • what side was the middle east on in ww1?

After Armenia fell into the grasp of the powerful Ottoman Empire during the 15th century, the Muslim rulers established their empire. Moreover, they subjected the Armenias (infidels), who were denied equal treatment by their government, to the unfairness of their treatment without limitation.

The University of Minnesota’s Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies compiled information from province and district that shows that two and a half million Armenias lived in Europe in 1914 and fewer than four hundred fifty thousand in 1922 as well.

They viewed Armenia as a tool of the Central Powers, eventhough their soldiers and officers, as well as 60,000 conscripts whose service spanned the entire war’s outset, typically fought loyally and bravely.

After rejecting a United States deadline to leave Cuba, Spain declares war against Washington. During the Easter revolt, a group of 1,600 militant Irish republicans backed by the Irish Republican Brotherhood seized several key sites in Dublin in an attempt to win independence from Britain.

In 1915, Turkey deports the Armenialian intellectuals from Constantinople (present-day Istanbul) that were on 24 April. A group of Genocide survivors from Armenia held an inaugural commemoration at the local church in 1919.

Following the arrests, most of the men were killed. Armenia’s population in Eastern Anatolia was quickly rounded up by the Ottoman government over fears that their presence near their front lines could pose a threat to national security shortly after losing Sarkam*.

Along several routes, some of which were not sustainable, the Syrians were driven to desert areas. As soon as the Turkish government decided to carry out deportations after the battle of Van that took place on 20 April 1915, when Armenia communities in the southeast of the country were met by an attack, Ottoman leaders made the measure a policy.

(Or Ottomaners), an almost overwhelming portion of Ottomans belonged either to the church of the Soviet Union (or Episcopal Church, if it was known as the Protestant Church) or to the Lutheran Church, the Christian Church. During the Tanzimat reforms of the nineteenth century, all Ottoman citizens were equal before the law. When the Tanzimat reforms were enacted, they become part ofArmenia.

Over the course of one thousand days, Armenian irregular units fought off the Ottoman army. A short period of armed resistance lasted during the initial response. It took the Russian Army two months to liberate the city of Van Caucasus from the Ottoman Empire. They drove the Ottoman army out after a battle with the Russians there.

When the Ottomans invaded Western Armenia after Peace Accords following the Amasya Battle 1665, Greater Armenia was eventually divided, despite having already once faced the Ottomans following the Ottoman-Safavid war (1601).

Military advances led by Ottoman forces succeeded in restoring order after an initial Russian invasion. Turkish troops eventually fought their way into modern day Iran (today: Iran.

It lasted from 1918 to 1920 as an independent state. Russia Republic was founded in areas of the disintegrated Russian Empire located between Russian Armenia and Turkey that are populated by the population of Soviet residents.

Turkish Armenia is divided administratively by way of administrative-territorial divisions as provided by the last draft of Armenia reforms signed in the Ottoman Empire and the Russian Empire, signed on February 8, 1914, by representatives of the Ottoman Empire and the Russian Empire.

This lineage owes its existence to Indo-Europeans. Their writings discuss whether the Armenias were related to the Phrygians of Asia Minor, who had entered Asia Minor from Thrace Herodotus told the ancient Greeks a group of kings and their peoples had imposed their culture.

the Russian troops. Around 1916, more than 1,000 volunteer Armenia soldiers quit the Russian side of the Eastern Front, took part in the Armenia irregular units (Fedayee) and fought against a single force of Russians.

A Second World War. As a member of the Soviet Union, Armenia supported the Allies during World War II. While the Great Patriotic War of World War II ravaged most of the west of Russia, Armenia has avoided its many destructions and destructions.

was on one side, the Ottoman Empire (including Kurds and some Arab tribes); while on the other side were the British (supported by Jews, Greeks, Assyrians, as well as other Persians, Kashmiris, and others).

Ex-deputy defense minister: Ukraine has almost always voted against Armenia on all international platforms

 NEWS.am 
Armenia – Feb 25 2022


Yerevan should take into account the fact that Ukraine has almost always voted against Armenia on all international platforms. Artak Zakaryan, a member of the former ruling Republican Party of Armenia and ex-deputy defense minister of the country,  told this to a press conference Friday.

According to him, these disagreements between Armenia and Ukraine have been at the level of both parliamentary and official diplomacy.

“We have had disagreements in foreign policy, too. It is obvious that Ukraine has always spoken in favor of Azerbaijan, not taking into account Armenia’s position. This refers to matters in connection with both Karabakh and other security issues. Kyiv adopted this position back in 2014,” Zakaryan explained.

So, as per the former Armenian official, Yerevan’s position on the current events unrolling over Ukraine should be clear, simple, and grounded.

In Artak Zakaryan’s view, the baseline justification in this regard should be that the recognition of the right of peoples to self-determination has always been key for Armenia.

Turkish press: Istanbul’s Sveti Stefan: The world’s only surviving iron church

A general view from the Church of Sveti Stefan, Istanbul, Turkey, July, 1, 2018. (AA)

Balat is an architecturally mesmerizing Istanbul district that takes you on a historical journey with its colorful buildings, synagogues, churches and mosques between the Ayvansaray and Fener neighborhoods on the shore of the Golden Horn. The district is named after the word “palation,” which means “palace” in Greek, due to its proximity to the Palace of Blachernae, located near the city walls.

A view from the entrance door of the Church of Sveti Stefan, Istanbul, Turkey, June, 6, 2019. (Photo by Murat Şengül)

When you visit Balat, a historical building awaits you at every corner. With its long slopes and structures in a range of architectural styles, it provides you with the opportunity to capture spectacular photographs while embarking on a mystical historical journey. Down one of the slopes of the district, the Bulgarian Orthodox Church of Sveti Stefan, also known as Iron Church, welcomes you.

Historical buildings are important not only for the sake of architecture but also for social and historical events. Witnessing many incidents throughout history, they may even become the protagonists of some events. The Church of Sveti Stefan is one of those important historical buildings. Let’s take a look at the social events that took place up until the church was built.

An early 20th-century postcard depicting the Iron Church. (Wikimedia)

The Ottoman Empire ruled the non-Muslims in its territory with a system called the “millet system.” According to this system, non-Muslims in the Ottoman lands were divided into three nations as Greek, Jewish and Armenian. Namely, they were classified according to their religion, not their ethnicity. Christians were also divided into two groups: Greek and Armenian. The religious and administrative responsibility of all Orthodox were in the hands of the Greek Patriarchate (Ecumenical Patriarchate). The patriarchate was the authority to which the Orthodox would apply in case of any problem. Since the Bulgarians living in the Ottoman lands had no religious and political representatives, their representative against the state was the Greek Patriarchate, as well. However, Bulgarian subjects complained about the Greek Patriarchate, which was in control of the religious administration. The Bulgarians were writing complaints to the Sublime Porte, the central government of the Ottoman Empire, about the forced assimilation and oppression under the Greek Patriarchate. The use of the Greek language for lessons and rites in schools and churches was one of their main complaints. They also wanted the Ottoman Empire to protect them in their complaint petitions and conducted various studies on this issue until they got results.

The original wooden church. (Wikimedia)

Bulgarian-born state official Stefan Bogoridi (Stefanaki Bey) was among the citizens of Bulgarian descent who carried out important works to escape from the oppression of the Greek Patriarchate. The Ottoman Empire allowed him to establish a place of worship for the people of Bulgarian origin. For this place, Stefan Bogoridi donated his house, which was reorganized as a wooden church for Bulgarians, and the foundation of the Bulgarian Exarchate was thus laid. In 1858, with an edict, the Bulgarians were allowed to build a new church in place of the wooden church but its construction could not be realized because the ground was not solid. Therefore, the construction of the new church was shelved until the building of the Iron Church.

On March 11, 1870, Sultan Abdülaziz issued the Exarchate Edict, which accepted the Bulgarians’ desire to establish an independent church. According to the edict, the Bulgarian Exarchate was recognized as an independent institution. After the wooden church suffered from a fire, it became necessary to build a new structure in its place despite the weak ground conditions. Therefore, an iron frame was preferred over concrete reinforcement.

The Iron Church, which cost 4 million levs at that time, was actually completed in 1896. However, it was blessed and launched for worship by Exarch Joseph I in 1898 after the redesign of the iconostasis. The bust of Stefanaki Bey, who made great efforts to open the church, was also placed in the garden of the church.

The most important feature of the Church of Sveti Stefan is that it is completely made of iron. A total of 500 tons of iron was cast for the parts of the church. The casted parts were brought from Vienna by ships via the Danube and the straits.

The architect of the church was Hovsep Aznavour and the manufacturer and construction company was Rudolf van Wagner, operating in Austria. The church, which features neo-Gothic and neo-Baroque architectural elements, also carries traces of the modern Renaissance style.

The bell tower of the church, whose altar faces the Golden Horn, is above the entrance door. All of the six bells in this tower, which is 40 meters (130 feet) high, were cast in Yaroslavl, Russia. Two of six bells are used today. The exterior decorations of the three-domed and cross-shaped church are fascinating. Just above the entrance door, you can see a sign representing the Trinity – Father, Son and the Holy Spirit – universe and sun.

Inside the church, the wooden iconostasis, which was also made in Russia, Moscow, also attracts attention with its standout icons. The icons depict many figures from Virgin Mary to Jesus, from Archangel Gabriel to saints Cyril and Methodius. The painted windows of the church also make great ambiance by the sun.

A general view from the Church of Sveti Stefan, Istanbul, Turkey, July, 1, 2018. (Photo by Murat Şengül)

In present days, the iron church stands out as a testament to the architecture of Bulgaria and Turkey. Following seven years of restoration, the church was reopened in 2018. With a capacity of 300 people, the church has stood like a pearl on the Golden Horn with its fascinating beauty for 124 years. Of the three iron churches in the world, the only surviving church is Sveti Stefan. If you happen to be in Balat, you should definitely visit the church by descending the hill between the historical houses.