Renowned Scholars Express Deep Concern Over Pashinyan’s Removal of Genocide Mu

Vice President JD Vance with AGMI Director Dr. Edita Gzoyan at Dzidzernagapert on Feb. 10


We, the undersigned, express deep concern over the recent and troubling developments at the Armenian Genocide Museum‑Institute in Yerevan. On March 11, Dr. Edita Gzoyan, one of the most outstanding and dedicated directors in the history of the Institute, submitted her resignation — reportedly under pressure from the government rather than by free choice. 

Dr. Gzoyan has elevated the AGMI to international academic prominence. Under her leadership, the Institute expanded its archival collections, organized key symposia and conferences, and produced scholarly works that have significantly advanced genocide studies worldwide. She has been a tireless advocate for rigorous historical research on the Armenian Genocide and related atrocities against Armenians — work that has strengthened global understanding of past injustices and supported the cause of historical truth. 

What makes her forced departure particularly alarming is its timing and context. Just weeks earlier, Dr. Gzoyan had personally guided U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance during his visit to the Tsitsernakaberd Memorial Complex. She highlighted not only the genocide of 1915 but also later massacres of Armenians in Sumgait, Kirovabad, and Baku, underscoring the historical continuity of anti‑Armenian violence in the region. She also presented Vice President Vance with scholarly works on the Armenian Genocide and the Nagorno‑Karabakh conflict — essential context for understanding Armenia’s history and contemporary challenges.  On March 12, in response to a journalist’s question regarding the forced resignation of Dr. Edita Gzoyan, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan stated:

“I was the one who asked the director of the Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute to submit a resignation letter; it was done on my instruction. I considered giving a book about Artsakh to Vance to be a provocative act that goes against the Government’s policy.”

The sequence of events indicates a broader and deeply troubling pattern: the silencing of independent academic voices in favor of political convenience. There is every reason to believe that this is less about museum administration and more about repositioning the AGMI to align its work with geopolitical priorities — especially a desire to avoid honest discussion of atrocities related to Azerbaijan amid ongoing normalization efforts. 

The Armenian Genocide Museum‑Institute is not merely a tourist site. It is a center of historical memory and scholarship — a bulwark against denial and distortion. Its leadership should be protected from political interference, not subjected to it. Dr. Gzoyan’s forced exit sends a chilling message to academics and historians everywhere: that rigorous inquiry and truthful remembrance can be displaced for diplomatic comfort.

All of us have been actively engaged with AGMI in numerous meaningful capacities—participating in its conferences, serving on the editorial board of the “International Journal of Armenian Genocide Studies” and on the academic board, collaborating with AGMI and its staff on joint scholarly initiatives, and contributing to the field through the publication of academic articles and books. Gzoyan has played a key role in involving us in AGMI’s activities through her creative vision and outstanding scholarship, helping shape the Institute’s future.

We believe that any attempt to remove Dr. Gzoyan from the directorship of the AGMI would seriously jeopardize the Institute’s future and undermine its standing within the international scholarly community. Such a decision would not only disrupt the Institute’s ongoing work but would also send a deeply troubling signal to leading scholars of genocide studies worldwide, discouraging them from collaborating with AGMI and weakening the global academic partnerships that are essential to its mission.

For these reasons, we strongly urge the Armenian government to refrain from interfering in the leadership of the Institute. We call on the authorities to respect the independence of AGMI and to ensure that Dr. Gzoyan is allowed to continue her work without political pressure or intervention. Protecting the Institute’s autonomy and leadership is critical for preserving its credibility, safeguarding its scholarly mission, and maintaining the trust of the international academic community. We believe that directorship of the AGMI should be based on the qualities of the individual as a scholar and administrator and not the political expediencies of any particular administration.

The AGMI staff and members of the Board have expressed their full confidence in Dr. Gzoyan’s exceptional leadership. We firmly demand that Dr. Gzoyan be reinstated immediately and allowed to continue the outstanding work she has been leading.

Prof. Bedross Der Matossian, Professor of History, Hymen Rosenberg Professor in Judaic Studies, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Prof. Elyse Semerdjian Robert Aram and Marianne Kaloosdian and Stephen and Marian Mugar Chair of Armenian Genocide Studies at the Strassler Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies at Clark University
Prof. Armen Marsoobian, Professor of Philosophy, Southern Connecticut State University
Prof. Keith Watenpaugh, Professor of Human Rights Studies, University of California, Davis
Prof. Melanie Schulze Tanielian, Associate Professor of History, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Dr. Simon Maghakyan, Associate Member of the Faculty of Asian and Middle Eastern Studies, University of Oxford
Dr. Boris Adjemian, Director of Bibliothèque Nubar de l’UGAB
Mr. Marc Mamigonian, Director of Academic Affairs, National Association for Armenian Genocide and Research
Prof. Vahé Tachjian, Houshamadyan, Berlin / Ara Hrechdakian Chair of Armenian Studies at Saint Joseph University of Beirut
Prof. Houri Berberian Professor of History, Meghrouni Family Presidential Chair in Armenian Studies University of California, Irvine
Prof. Henry Theriault, Ph.D., Vice-Chair, Board of Directors, National Association for Armenian Studies and Research, and Co-Editor, “Genocide Studies International”
Prof. Ronald Grigor Suny, William H. Sewell Jr. Distinguished University Professor of History Emeritus, The University of Michigan; Professor of Political Science and History Emeritus, The University of Chicago
Prof. Barlow Der Mugrdechian, Haig and Isabel Berberian Coordinator of Armenian Studies, California State University, Fresno
Prof. Lori Khatchadourian, Associate Professor, Departments of Near Eastern Studies & Anthropology, Cornell University
Dr. Hilmar Kaiser, Universität Bern
Mr. Michael Bobelian, Adjunct Professor at Columbia University and Baruch College
Prof. A. Dirk Moses, Anne and Bernard Spitzer Professor of International Relations at the City College of New York
Prof. Hervè Georgelin, Assistant Professor, National University of Athens, Greece
Mr. Gregory Aftandilian, Senior Professorial Lecture, American University, Washington, DC
Prof. Julien Zarifian, Professor of U.S. History, University of Poitiers, France
Prof. Fatma Müge Göçek, Professor of Sociology, University of Michigan
Prof. David Gaunt, Emeritus Professor of History, Södertörn University, Stockholm, Sweden
Prof. Tessa Hofmann, formerly Freie Universität Berlin, Germany, Institute for Eastern European Studies
Dr. Talar Chahinian, Continuing Lecturer in Armenian Studies, University of California, Irvine
Prof. Samuel Totten, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville

168: Billions came from abroad

March: 9, 2026

In recent years, in the form of private transfers, sums amounting to tens of billions of dollars have come to Armenia from abroad. They came especially from Russia. They served the political agenda of the authorities, but not the development of Armenia’s economy.

The sanctions applied to Russia have become a real salvation for today’s rulers of Armenia. Without it, it is hard to imagine what they would do. The economic growths that have been recorded in the last few years and of which they are so proud, are not due to the developments of the Armenian economy, but mainly due to this. If there were no sanctions, there would be no such economic growth either.

They are not only financial, but also the result of serving huge commodity flows.

In addition to the direct impact on trade movements, they also greatly influenced the economic indicators of Armenia. For example, the role of Russian gold is invaluable for the industry, about which they try to talk as little as possible. However, without Russian gold, not only would there not have been, let’s say, the slight growth of last year, but it would also have been impossible to avoid the decline. The influence of Russian gold on the industry is so great that after 2-3 months of active re-exports of gold, the industry came out of the decline recorded for months and also recorded growth. But that is not development. And you will not go far with such increases. Such increases give almost nothing, both to the economy and to the society.

Read also

  • Banks are counting billions, citizens are emptying their pockets
  • Suspicious activity: British money in Armenia, Armenian money in Switzerland
  • The artificial respiration of a dying economy. government vs. heroes  

That is the reason why “revolutionary” increases very often do not add anything to the pocket of an ordinary citizen, instead, they give the authorities an opportunity to create an illusion of developments.

The financial and commodity flows that circulate through Armenia continue to be a lifeline for the authorities. 3-4 years after the start of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, huge financial resources are coming to Armenia. Another record of private transfers was registered last year. Almost 6 billion dollars came from abroad only through the banking system.

We are talking exclusively about the money sent by citizens, which exceeded last year’s record by 142 million.

But it is not with the difference of 142 million that the whole change of money coming from abroad, which is happening in the last few years, can be seen. Small sums of money did not enter Armenia before. But what we see after the Russian-Ukrainian conflict is incredible. In a short time, the financial flows entering Armenia through private transfers, exclusively through the banking system, have increased almost 3 times.

If in 2021 they were within the framework of 2.1 billion dollars, now they have reached 6 billion.

The main part of that money comes from Russia.

Russian flows continued to remain extremely high last year.

Of the 5 billion 979 million dollars that came to Armenia through banks, 3 billion 878 million are Russian capital. It made up almost 65 percent of the receipts.

In order to make it clear what happened in these few years in terms of transfers from Russia to Armenia, let us record that in 2021 during the whole year, the entry of Russian capital through this pipeline amounted to only 865 million dollars. It increased 4.5 times in four years, reaching 3 billion 878 million dollars.

In total, more than 15.2 billion dollars entered Armenia from Russia in four years. No other country has ever received so much money in Armenia in 4 years. Although most of these amounts were of commercial significance, they had a direct impact on the economy, trade and especially the financial sector. The high growth recorded in the banking system and the huge profits secured are also related to these amounts.

Money comes to Armenia from other countries as well, but they are much less than what comes only from Russia.

As always, the second place is the United States, whose share is around 12 percent.

733 million dollars came from the USA last year, which is 43 million more than the previous year.

During the last 4 years, the money transferred from the United States has also increased, but much less, in the amount of only 153 million.

Recently, there has been a sharp activity in terms of money sent from Great Britain to Armenia through the private transfer channel. In that sense, Great Britain has not been active in relations with Armenia before. However, recently the activity has increased dramatically. For example, last year the inflow of funds from that country almost doubled, reaching 207 million dollars. Just 4 years ago, they were barely around 40-41 million dollars.

They have increased by 5 times in four years. But the activity has increased especially in the last 1-2 years. It is not known what contributed to such activity of British capital flows in Armenia, but they came mainly under the name of trade transfers. Non-commercial ones are only in the order of 22-23 million dollars or 10-11 percent of the transfers made.

In the last 4 years, through private financial transfers, exclusively through the banking system, a total of 22.7 billion dollars entered Armenia, 15.2 billion from Russia. This is a huge amount for a country with a small economy like Armenia. An average annual amount of 5.7 billion dollars came from abroad through private transfers, which is very little inferior to the expenses made in the state budget. Regardless of the purpose for which these funds entered Armenia, how they were circulated, they had a direct impact on economic indicators and especially on the financial sector. Another thing is that very often these effects were not qualitative, because the political power was unable to use these huge resources for the development of the economy and the increase of economic capacities.

HAKOB KOCHARYAN




“Danger of toxic rain in the region. and in Armenia there is silence”. Anush P

March: 9, 2026

Anush Poghosyan writes: “Danger of toxic rain in the region. and in Armenia there is silence

Iran has warned there is a risk of “toxic rain” due to fires caused by US and Israeli strikes on oil storage facilities.

What does “poison rain” really mean?

During the burning of oil storage facilities, the following are emitted into the atmosphere:

sulfur compounds (SO₂),
nitrogen oxides (NOₓ),
hydrocarbons,
soot and heavy metal particles.

These substances can mix with water in the clouds, form acidic compounds, and then fall to the earth with precipitation. This phenomenon is often called acid or conventional “poison rain”.

What should the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Armenia do in case of such a danger?

The main responsibility of the Ministry is:

assess health risks,
protect the health of the population,
keep medical facilities ready,
provide clear and timely public information.

However, everything seems to be fine in Armenia.

It is SILENCE.

Ministry of Health, at least tell me if there is no danger or if you just don’t have time yet to understand what is happening.”

After the incident of the Iranian ATS in Nakhichevan, the Turkic bloc met in Stambo

March: 9, 2026

Against the background of the US-Israel war against Iran and the recent incident in Nakhijevan with the participation of Iranian anti-aircraft missiles, the Turkic world has presented a united front.

The Minister of Foreign Affairs of Turkey, Hakan Fidan, has announced the formation of a joint position of the countries of the Organization of Turkic States (TPC) in response to external threats.

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan held an informal meeting of the Council of Foreign Ministers of the member countries of the Organization of Turkic States in Istanbul, which was attended by the representatives of the member states and the secretary general of the organization. According to reports, the diplomats focused on global and regional challenges that require solidarity and the ability to act “with one voice” from the Turkic world.

The main result of the meeting, according to the publication, was the adoption of the Joint Declaration, in which the countries of the organization officially expressed their collective response to the attacks against Turkey and Azerbaijan. “The participants of the council fixed the principle of indivisibility of security in the document. an attack on any member of the organization is a source of serious concern and a threat to all other participants,” the message said.

Read also

  • THE POLITICAL POWER THAT DABRO WILL WAIT FROM OUTSIDE WILL BE LOST. DON’T LET THE MONKEY GET A GRENADE IN THE HAND. From Suren Surenyas
  • “The end of the war is not foreseen. Mojtaba Khamenei may have a more radical position.” Ashot Badalyan
  • War against Iran. will the Kurds be drawn into a “suicide mission” for the interests of America and Israel?

“In the Joint Statement we adopted, we resolutely demonstrated our common response to the attacks against our country and Azerbaijan, as well as solidarity within our ‘family council’. We have recorded that the attack on one of the members is a source of concern and threat for all the participants of the organization,” emphasized Hakan Fidan.

He also noted that the parties have agreed to move to deeper foreign policy coordination. According to him, the Turkic states have a common will to strengthen peace and stability in the region. “The Organization of Turkic States will resolutely continue its efforts aimed at strengthening peace, stability and prosperity in our region,” the Turkish Foreign Minister concluded.

And all this, despite the fact that the President of Iran made several interesting announcements in a video message about the attacks on neighboring countries. “It is necessary for me to apologize to the neighboring countries that were attacked by Iran. Our leader, our commanders and our students lost their lives due to the brutal aggression of the enemy. Our armed forces are ready for self-sacrifice. they put their lives on the line to protect the country’s territorial integrity. When commanders were not present, they acted on their own initiative (“fire at discretion”), doing whatever was necessary to defend our homeland with honor and might.

We do not intend to carry out aggression against neighboring countries, they are our brothers, and we are trying to establish peace and tranquility with them hand in hand,” Pezeshkian said. He also announced that in the interim leadership council they decided and conveyed to the armed forces that from now on neighboring countries should not be attacked or hit with rockets, unless there is an attack from those countries in our direction. “We should solve these issues with each other through diplomacy,” Pezeshkian said. It should also be noted here that in the late evening of March 8, the Iranian state media reported on the election of Ali Khamenei’s son, Mojtaba Khamenei, as the spiritual leader of Iran.

Mojtaba Khamenei is known for his strong ties to the military-political elite, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, and his radical stance toward the West. According to a number of Iranian Telegram news channels, shortly after being elected, Iran resumed strikes against some of the Persian Gulf countries.

However, it became known today that Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian had a telephone conversation with Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev and announced that Tehran had nothing to do with the incident involving drones in Nakhichevan. “On March 8, at the initiative of the Iranian side, a telephone conversation took place between presidents Masoud Pezeshkian and Ilham Aliyev. The leader of Azerbaijan emphasized the importance of investigating the incident in Nakhijevan,” the message said. “Masud Pezeshkian stated that the airstrike in Nakhijevan has nothing to do with Iran, and emphasized that the incident will be investigated,” the press service added. And in fact, as in the case of the AZAL plane incident with Russia, as with the Nakhichevan incident with Iran, the Azerbaijani side is proceeding in the same scenario, demanding an investigation, after which an apology, compensation, thereby trying to give Azerbaijan additional weight and role.

Russian Orientalist, Turkologist Viktor Nadein-Raevsky 168.amtold that Turkey and Azerbaijan are trying to use the incidents of Incirlik and Nakhichevan to ensure a broad Turkish mobilization around the interests of themselves and the Turkic world and to receive the support of the rest of the Turkic countries, as needed. According to him, naturally, the meeting of representatives of Turkic countries in Istanbul aims to advance the interests of Turkey and Azerbaijan.

“It has been a long time since Turkey and Azerbaijan, acting as leading countries, have been deepening the cooperation between the member countries of the Organization of Turkic-speaking countries, particularly with Kazakhstan, trying to offer the Middle Corridor program to the West.

In other words, this rapprochement is not at all a coincidence or the result of some incidents, but a logical continuation of the already ongoing policy. All geopolitical developments should be viewed in terms of general trends. And it is no coincidence that the global war against Iran has started, against this background, Turkey and Azerbaijan are trying to strengthen themselves even more, showing caution towards Iran. At the same time, such meetings and mobilization are aimed at showing strength,” the expert analyzed.

According to him, Iran’s confrontation with the USA and Israel still restrains and manages many developments, including the deepening of Turkish influence.

As for the South Caucasus and Armenia, Victor Nadei-Raevsky said that these trends are directly related to Armenia and the South Caucasus, where Turkey and its partners are trying to strengthen themselves even more, continuing the trends of recent years.

“There are both challenges and opportunities for Armenia here. The main thing is that in military matters, Azerbaijan can present itself not alone, but as part of the Turkic bloc. Nakhichevan is becoming an important strategic base for Azerbaijan. And in this direction, joint military exercises and so on may be started to show strength to Iran, this will naturally be a new situation for the south of Armenia.

If the tension with Iran continues, Armenia may find itself in a difficult situation: on the one hand, the need for cooperation with Iran, on the other hand, the political pressure of the Turkic bloc led by Turkey and Azerbaijan and the deepening of its influence in the region. The challenges are still deepening,” said Victor Nadein-Raevsky.

According to a new survey, after the June elections, Nikol Pashinyan no longer

March: 9, 2026

The data of the last survey conducted before and after February 12 show that Samvel Karapetyan is considered the leading candidate to replace Nikol Pashinyan as the Prime Minister. He writes about this news.amthe

According to a survey conducted by the Empirica research and consulting company, after the launch of the “Strong Armenia” party, when people were asked which of these two candidates should be the next prime minister, 35% of respondents at the national level chose Samvel Karapetyan, and 34% chose Nikol Pashinyan, and the results in Yerevan are more pronounced: 49% of respondents here chose Samvel Karapetyan, and only 24% chose Nikol Pashinyan.

In the comparison of prime ministerial candidates, Samvel Karapetyan has an 18% advantage over Nikol Pashinyan among young people aged 18-29, by 4% among 30-49-year-olds, while Nikol Pashinyan is leading only in the group of voters over 50. Among men, their support is equal, and among women, Samvel Karapetyan is ahead by 2%.

The data on the suitability for the post of Prime Minister is also reflected in the picture of the parliamentary vote, where the “Civil Pact” party gets only 28%, while the opposition forces together have 47%. According to these results, Samvel Karapetyan is considered the leading candidate to become the prime minister as the leader of the opposition party.

Nikol Pashinyan steadily lost and continues to lose the support of voters. The fall of public trust has been contributed by the failure to fulfill promises, the non-serious attitude towards security issues, the problems related to the supply of drinking water, the increase in prices and the deepening of the threat of war. Most of the disappointed voters relied on the new party led by Samvel Karapetyan. The support of the party has increased significantly in recent months. it increased from 4% to 13% from November 2025 to January 2026. The launch of the “Strong Armenia” party gave an additional significant boost to that growth, and the voting intention index reached 24%.

In Yerevan, the support of the “Strong Armenia” party is even higher, almost doubling that of the “Civil Pact”. If the parliamentary elections were held now, 35% of voters in Yerevan would vote for “Strong Armenia”, while “Civil Pact” would receive only 17%.

The “Armenia” alliance would collect 11%, and the rest of the opposition forces – 16%. In addition, since the share of undecided voters is only 8%, there are not enough voters left that Nikol Pashinyan and the “Civil Pact” can win over. This means that Pashinyan has already lost the elections in Yerevan.

People are losing confidence in Nikol Pashinyan both in Yerevan and throughout Armenia. In Yerevan, only 24% are satisfied with his work as the prime minister, while 75% are dissatisfied. The situation at the national level is also not favorable for Pashinyan. 37% are satisfied with his work, and 61% are dissatisfied.

People are losing confidence in Nikol Pashinyan, because they are afraid of the resumption of war and think that the peace established by him is only temporary.

They realize that under a weak prime minister like Nikol Pashinyan, peace is just a dream and war can start again at any time, as it happened in 2020 during his administration. 64% of respondents in Yerevan stated that they are “very worried” about the possibility of resumption of war by Azerbaijan, and another 24% are “somewhat worried”.

Only 11% stated that they are “not that worried” or “not worried at all”. The fear of war is also very high at the national level. 53% are “very worried”, 32% are “somewhat worried”, and only 14% are “not so worried” or “not worried at all”.

news.am

168: That the political force that will wait for Dabro from outside will be destroyed. Let’s Not Let You Monkey!

March: 9, 2026

“Pressing” in the program Satik Seyranyan the guest political scientist, the chairman of the “Democratic Alternative” party, Suren Surenyants։

A few days ago, the former Secretary of the Security Council of the Republic of Artsakh, Vitaly Balasanyan, made another statement in a conversation with journalists, in which it was said:

“It’s a shame, it’s a shame. I strongly doubt that there will be elections here, because the international situation, in general, in our region is a catastrophic, extremely difficult situation. They talk about peace, but now there is no document. The Armenian authorities are talking about a piece of paper, but it is not even a memorandum. In the near future, the political map will change, now those who understood their place, role, importance, learned that they are in the world order, will be saved very soon. Armenia should maintain very good relations with Iran, and we should be part of the Union. I don’t know what they will call it now, but it is the same as the Soviet Union,” said Balasanyan.

The authorities, the Communist Party, and their propagandists immediately began to present his words as the viewpoint of the opposition.

Read also

  • Khamenei’s son signed his death sentence. The US will arm the Iranian opposition. Yakov Kedmi
  • “The end of the war is not foreseen. Mojtaba Khamenei may have a more radical position.” Ashot Badalyan
  • War against Iran. will the Kurds be drawn into a “suicide mission” for the interests of America and Israel?

What does Vitaly Balasanyan have to do with the opposition in general, whose point of view is he actually expressing?

The main theses of the interview with Suren Surenyants are below.

  • I never considered Vitaly Balasanyan a person with serious mental abilities and I did not take his statements seriously. Vitaly Balasanyan unwittingly voiced an idea that is a gift to the government, because the entire narrative of the government is built on it, as if the entire opposition is a Russian citizen. And it is more important that he made this statement from the courtyard of the Mother See. If you say in the same interview that you have close relations with the Catholicos, then you say that Armenia should be a part of the Union State, and this is in the case when the nail of the government’s anti-Church campaign is His Holiness’s alleged pro-Russianness. As the head of a political force, let me say that Vitaly Balasanyan made a reprehensible statement. Any statement that would question Armenia’s sovereignty is foreign to me. People like Vitaly Balasanyan are the counter-pole of pseudo-Westerners. A person who does not stand out for his active public activities, suddenly appears in the pre-election stage and says such things to the media, gives rise to suspicion that, to put it mildly, his game is not honest.

Official propaganda received a gift in the name of Vitaly Balasanyan:

  • Unlike Azerbaijan and Central Asian countries, we won our sovereignty with the 1988 movement.

  • The question of joining the Russia-Belarus Union was never discussed at the official level, neither in Moscow nor in Yerevan. 
  • Of course, Nikol Pashinyan destroyed our sovereignty, but that does not mean that the solution is to become someone’s outpost. The 1988 movement was an independent, anti-imperialist movement. Vitaly Balasanyan should first explain his statement and then say that it is his personal opinion and has nothing to do with any political force. I have not seen Vitaly Balasanyan in any serious opposition format after 2023 and, frankly, I don’t want to see him.
  • Donald Trump has become a hostage of “Epstein’s coalition”. There is no hint of strategy in Trump’s actions. Israel has a strategy, which through its lobbying structures was able to place Trump in its pocket. Israel’s strategy is clear. they are on the path of dismembering Iran. They imagine 6-7 states instead of Iran. It is already obvious that some hopes of Tel-Aviv and Washington have not come true. Iran is neither Venezuela nor Syria. The loss of a spiritual leader could not destroy Iran:
  • Mojtaba Khamenei, the new spiritual leader, became the consensus of various factions of the Iranian elite and a large part of society. Iran’s message is that they will continue to fight with the same toughness. At the moment, at least, Iran’s political system shows no visible cracks.
  • It is not that Aliyev has no desire to join the anti-Iranian operations, but Aliyev is not adventurous. He would take such a drastic step if the Iranian system were tottering. If today he is looking for diplomatic ways to solve the issue with Iran, then he has information that the Iranian system is still stable:
  • Turkey does not need Iranian chaos or fragmentation. He will prevent Azerbaijan from such an adventure.

  • At the moment, Pezeshkian or Aragchi is playing more of a decoration role because at the moment all the power in Iran is concentrated in the hands of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council of Iran, Ali Larijani and others.:
  • I have doubts about the International Republican Institute, IRI polls, because I was aware of different results before they were published. But even with their results, the public’s positive attitude towards TRIPP is 44% against 48% negative. Nikol Pashinyan needs a new success story, because even after all this preaching, there is no positive consensus among the public regarding TRIPP. 

Besides, in any case, whether Iran wins or loses this war, TRIPP loses its relevance. Moreover, if Aliyev sees that the roads are not opening, Aliyev will not be able to resist the temptation to take it. That’s why the official propaganda of Armenia is lobbying uncontrollably about giving Azerbaijan a humanitarian corridor. This is an Azeri demand, which the CP government has a problem of packing. They want a road, let them go to Nakhijevan through the borders of Armenia’s sovereignty, with a border guard, customs point, why are you doing special propaganda? Or, what humanitarian corridor do you provide? Does Azerbaijan behave very humanitarianly when ours? holds captives. The government is creating all the grounds not for a humanitarian corridor, but for giving Azerbaijan a privileged path, because it has understood that TRIPP will not be implemented.:

  • God forbid, Iran will be divided. In that case, our statehood will face serious danger, Armenia will become a Turkish enclave. The worst scenario for Armenia in this war is the fragmentation of Iran.
  • When there was a pause in the middle of serious acts in the circus, a novice clown was sent to keep the people busy. For the big players, Nikol Pashinyan is the clown who was sent to occupy the people so that people don’t realize what is happening around them, don’t see the real dangers, don’t see what disasters the partition of Iran is fraught with for us, that if they lose the Armenian-Iranian border, you won’t need anyone, that there are 10-20 million Azerbaijanis in the north of Iran, that you are surrounded by enemies from several sides.: 
  • Yes, it is necessary to maintain neutrality in this war. no one says that you should take someone’s side, but neutrality does not mean degradation, it does not mean a happy bus presentation in a fire, a discotheque, the only niche in which Nikol Pashinyan felt valued is playing crazy. Nikol Pashinyan certainly has a loss of adequacy, but let’s not overestimate it, because he is adequate to keep his power. This man destroyed half of the Motherland and was not held accountable. Now he is thinking: if he did such a thing and was not punished, why should he be punished for rigging the election? It’s our fault for letting a man who lost a war get re-elected.

  • Only a very strong public consolidation will bring Nikol Pashinyan to rejection. A very large participation in the elections should be ensured. The public must become a subject. People, don’t do such a thing on June 7 that the Azerbaijani special forces will have the right to make arrests in Armenia later.:
  • There won’t be a miracle on June 7 if you don’t lay the groundwork for it by June 7 and don’t have a plan by June 8, because you’re dealing with a kamikaze government that will blow up the country by blowing itself up. It is still in the mood of “Either I will be the prime minister or Armenia will not have a prime minister” in 2018. We must have a scenario for post-election developments. What are we going to do if the monkey’s hand turns out to be a grenade on the night of June 7, when he realizes that he has lost the election? 

We are dealing with absolute collaborator authorities, which is ready to destroy the state, only to reproduce itself. The government has external supporters in these elections: the West, Turkey, Azerbaijan. Unfortunately, the opposition has no external supporters. The only supporter of the opposition is the people. Any political force that waits for help from outside will be destroyed. On September 21, the Armenian people were waiting for Dabro? People should know one thing, by voting for Nikol Pashinyan, they will vote for the “Western Azerbaijan” faction in the National Assembly. I don’t want to become anyone’s satellite, even more so I don’t want to become a dog tied to the door of Turkey and Azerbaijan. If the people left conscious choice, Nikol Pashinyan cannot even receive asylum from his Kaya Kalas and others.

Nikol Pashinyan’s regional visits suggest that even in the regions he receives a slap. The conscious choice of the people can turn the government’s happy bus into a hellish bus:

Details in the video.




RFE/RL – Kocharian Set To Again Vie For Power

March 09, 2026

Armenia — Former President Robert Kocharian speaks during a news conference in Yerevan, January 29, 2026.

Former President Robert Kocharian has given the clearest indication yet that he will top his Hayastan alliance’s list of candidates in Armenia’s parliamentary elections slated for June 7.

Hayastan came in a distant second with 21 percent of the vote in the last elections held in 2021. Kocharian announced last November that he will enter the forthcoming parliamentary race with essentially the same political team that might be joined by new opposition groups or figures. But he said it is not yet clear whether he will be the bloc’s candidate for Armenia’s prime minister.

Speaking on a YouTube podcast co-hosted by his political allies at the weekend, the 71-year-old ex-president implied that he will again vie for the top government post. Citing his past executive experience, he insisted that he can successfully deal with grave security challenges facing Armenia.

“We now need to position ourselves as a political force led by someone who did that a couple of times, who achieved quite serious success in crisis situations and can do that for a third time,” he said. “This should be our message to our voters.”

Opinion polls suggest that a recently established movement led by billionaire Samvel Karapetian has replaced Hayastan as the country’s most popular force. Kocharian acknowledged in that regard that his alliance has lost some of its popular support since 2021. But, he said, it has at the same time dented Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian’s popularity, paving the way for the emergence of new opposition heavyweights. Clearly singling out Karapetian, Kocharian insisted that he is more qualified to run the country than their leaders.

“The main question is: who can do that? A person who has proved that he can do that, a political team that has proved that it’s a fighter or totally new people who have that desire but not yet the [necessary] experience and have not yet proved their worth in the political struggle in practice?” he said.

Pashinian has repeatedly expressed confidence that his Civil Contract party will win the upcoming elections. Visiting Gyumri on Saturday, he declared that it is aiming for as much as 65 percent of the vote. Opposition figures and other government critics claim that Pashinian is actually afraid of losing the polls.

In recent weeks, senior Civil Contract members have exposed their apparent fears that opposition forces led by Kocharian, Karapetian and another wealthy businessman, Gagik Tsarukian, will collectively win a majority in the next Armenian parliament and be able to form a coalition government. Some of them have said that the Armenian authorities “will not allow” such an outcome, fueling opposition claims that they are planning electoral fraud or foul play.

A Riveting Graphic Novel of an Armenian Family in San Francisco

KQED.org
Mar 10 2026

In 1999, the year she graduated from art school, Bay Area illustrator Nadine Takvorian wrote in an Armenian magazine that she hoped to someday write a book about her experience in the Armenian diaspora. Now, 27 years later, the first-generation Armenian American has released Armaveni:A Graphic Novel of the Armenian Genocide, an autobiographical graphic novel named after her grandmother.

“It’s taken me over half a lifetime to make that dream a reality,” she says.

Armaveni tells the story of how Takvorian’s family survived the Armenian genocide, became Bolsahye (Armenians who live in Turkey) and eventually made a life in San Francisco, operating a small business. Takvorian’s family ran a specialty food shop founded in 1956 called Haig’s Delicacies, named after her uncle, located a block away from Green Apple Books in the Inner Richmond. It was later operated by her parents before its retail space closed.

“It was a very special place for me growing up,” Takvorian says. “It was kind of like a San Francisco foodie destination for a while, a well known place to find delicacies from Europe and the Middle East and India. Now it’s easier to find these kinds of items, but back in the day it was pretty hard.”

In Armaveni, Nadine works occasionally at the shop, showcasing her industriousness and cultural curiosity. An inquisitive young girl, she pesters her parents to explain why her grandmother’s eyes “are always so sad” until one day they acquiesce and unfold her backstory. The book moves back and forth through time from Nadine’s perspective as a schoolgirl who has a homeland she’s never visited and her grandmother Armaveni’s perspective as a young girl in Hayastan (Armenia) living through the Meds Yeghern or “Great Catastrophe” during WWI.

Though she began her career working in the children’s educational market, and has worked on projects like a richly color-saturated Beowulf comic adaptation for kids, Takvorian’s first graphic novel is not in full color. “The subject matter required more restraint,” the author explains. The pages are covered in a lavender wash that gives them an archival feel, in line with the book’s theme of an old family story being dusted off and recounted.

Though we follow Nadine in the book as a teen, in reality, Takvorian was in her thirties when she learned Armaveni’s tale. In a note at the end of Armaveni, she attributes this delay to “old-world habits of the adults shielding children from information that could put them in danger, and my own fear of what I might learn about our family’s history.”

Her grandmother’s story takes place in an Armenia that’s under attack from the Ottoman Empire, which is waging a campaign of ethnic cleansing in an attempt to consolidate power and cultural hegemony. It is estimated over one million Armenians were exiled from their land and massacred. Grandma Armaveni’s story panels show Armenians (who were among the earliest adopters of Christianity) forced into religious conversion, trafficked, and, in one harrowing scene, women and children fleeing a schoolhouse they’d been corralled into by soldiers and left to burn.

Though Armaveni is a memoir of her family’s story, the heart of the novel is Nadine’s discovery of this persecution, which Armenians identify as a genocide, and the frustrations she feels when she realizes her parents do not wish to discuss it. Many deny it ever happened, including one of her American schoolteachers, and the country that perpetrated it, Turkey.

“Genocide recognition is so important to the Armenian community,” Takvorian explains, noting that the issue is unfortunately used “as a political football” by politicians. “It’s dangled as, Well, if you do this, then we might recognize the genocide and we don’t want to do that and you don’t want us to do that.” In 2021, on the 106th anniversary of its start, President Biden became the first American president to officially recognize the Armenian genocide — a recognition that the Trump administration has been accused of walking back.

At the end of the novel, Takvorian offers a primer on the consequences of cultural erasure. That includes a note on Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code, which states it is illegal to insult Turkey, and has been used to go after journalists and writers like Turkish Nobel laureate Orhan Pamuk for bringing up the persecution of Armenians. For her and other members of the Armenian community, it is important for there to be “closure and consequences” after years of being denied them.

Armaveni is visually personalized. A typeface is based on Takvorian’s actual handwriting, and the pages that recount her grandmother’s story have a storybook frame inspired by ancient Armenian manuscripts that Takvorian encountered at a library in England, “really lush and full of a lot of decorative elements,” she explains. “It’s one of my favorite Easter eggs in the book.”

The nuances of Nadine’s daily experience help the reader’s understanding of Armenian identity. For example, when a fellow Armenian accuses her of being “Turkified,” Nadine experiences the stigma of being Bolsahye —a word that combines “Bolis,” the Armenian word for Istanbul, with a term that signifies Armenian identity. These interactions reveal purity tests and friction that exist within the Armenian diaspora.

Throughout, Takvorian’s book offers readers a cultural education simply by threading in Armenian words and customs. In a subtle one-page seven-panel sequence, Nadine and her family are pulling out of their driveway before a plane trip and her mom splashes water from a pitcher at them and says, “May your journey flow like water.” While the action goes unexplained, it is easily inferred that this is an Armenian custom. Spilling water for luck is in fact a folk tradition in the country and in many of its neighboring countries.

Armaveni is ultimately a very personal story, but one whose themes offer a timely lesson about what it means for a people to be forced to insist on their existence. “This is important for all of us to learn about, because it’s our collective humanity,” Takvorian explains. “This is something that happened to Armenians, but then you see it happening again and again to different groups of people … It’s an Armenian story, but it’s also our story, and it’s really important to share that and help people understand that.”


‘Armaveni:A Graphic Novel of the Armenian Genocide’ is out now. Nadine Takvorian appears March 10 at Green Apple Books in San Francisco; March 14 at Mrs. Dalloway’s in Berkeley; March 15 at the Cartoon Art Museum in San Francisco; and March 21 at Linden Tree Books in Los Altos. Details on author appearances here.


Armenia warns of foreign pressure on diaspora ahead of election

OC Media
Mar 10 2026

Armenia’s Foreign Intelligence Service (FIS) has detected signs of possible foreign interference ahead of the country’s 7 June parliamentary elections. The FIS said Armenians living abroad have reportedly been pressured to back certain political parties, without specifying the country behind the alleged interference.

The statement was issued exclusively to the state-run media outlet Armenpress on Tuesday.

Based on intelligence, the FIS said various actors in an unnamed foreign country, who reportedly present themselves as representatives of that country’s special services, ‘are attempting to exert pressure’ on individuals of Armenian origin and Armenian nationals engaged in economic activities there.

The goal of the pressures are ‘to induce them to undertake actions supporting certain political forces that have declared their intention to participate in the upcoming parliamentary elections in Armenia’, the statement read.

It further clarified that the actions include ‘the provision by the said businesspersons of financial and organisational support to those political forces’.

The ruling Civil Contract party’s main opponent in the upcoming elections is believed to be Russian–Armenian tycoon Samvel Karapetyan’s Strong Armenia Party.

According to the International Republican Institute (IRI) latest survey, 20% of respondents chose Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan as the most trustworthy political figure, followed by Karapetyan at 10%.

Karapetyan, who is currently under house arrest, was detained in June 2025 after making public statements siding with the Armenian Apostolic Church amid its confrontation with Pashinyan’s government. While under arrest, Karapetyan announced his entry into politics.

Other main candidates declaring their participation in the elections include  former president Robert Kocharyan’s Armenia Alliance, the largest opposition faction in the current Armenian parliament, as well as tycoon Gagik Tsarukyan, leader of the Prosperous Armenia party, who has vowed to build a political ‘Noah’s Ark’.

‘Just as Noah saw the path to salvation and rebirth, we must try to do the same today’, Tsarukyan said.

The former ruling Republican Party and its leader, former president Serzh Sargsyan, ousted by the 2018 Velvet Revolution, have yet to declare their decision regarding their participation in the elections.

Civil Contract, which vowed to secure a constitutional majority in the elections, also warned that the opposition intends to come to power through a coalition formed after the vote.

‘Hybrid attacks’

In addition to the most recent FIS report, the agency had previously warned that ahead of the elections, ‘the influence operations conducted against Armenia by various foreign actors will highly likely become more comprehensive, complex and large-scale’.

The annual report of FIS also noted that hybrid threats against Armenia in 2026 would ‘highly likely become more comprehensive, complex, and large-scale’ in the run-up to the vote.

While the report has not singled out any specific country as being behind the ‘hybrid war’ against Armenia, officials from the EU and Yerevan have accused Moscow of employing various tactics against the country, including disinformation campaigns and other attempts to interfere in Armenia’s domestic affairs.

In the past several months leading up to the elections, Armenia has also seen heightened numbers of disinformation coming from foreign sources, imitating well-established newsrooms, which they frame as ‘hybrid attacks’.

In February, Pashinyan’s spokesperson Nazerli Baghdasaryan said the Russian and Chinese bot networks Matryoshka, Storm, and DragonBridge are responsible for spreading false narratives about Armenia.

Daghestani man nicknamed ‘Donald Trump’ fined for anti-Armenian comments on T

OC Media
Mar 10 2026

A man from Daghestan posting under the handle ‘Donald Trump’ has been fined ₽10,000 ($125) for making comments on Telegram containing insults and calls for violence against Armenians.

Tofik Ismailov, 33, was fined by the Lenin District Court in Daghestan on 4 March.

Ismailov was found guilty of inciting hatred or enmity, as well as ‘humiliating the dignity of a person or group of persons on the basis of nationality’. These charges only apply if such actions were committed publicly, including online, but do not constitute a criminal offence.

According to the case materials, the administrative proceedings were initiated over comments the Telegram user left under the nickname ‘Donald Trump’. The authorities have concluded that the posts encouraged ‘actions involving violence, danger, and causing harm’ towards Armenians.

The comments were discovered as early as August 2025. The administrative case was opened on 24 February 2026 by the deputy prosecutor of the Lenin District of Makhachkala following the results of the investigation. In early March, the case materials were submitted to the court. They were initially returned to correct procedural deficiencies, after which, on 4 March, the case was resubmitted to court and considered for consideration.

According to the ruling, during the court session Ismailov did not deny that he had used the account under the name ‘Donald Trump’ nor that he had posted anti-Armenian comments. He admitted his guilt and confirmed that he personally published the posts.

When determining his punishment, the court took into account that Ismailov had admitted his guilt and had not previously been held administratively liable under the same article. These circumstances were considered mitigating. No aggravating circumstances were identified.

As a result, the court imposed the minimum fine provided by law — ₽10,000 ($125). Punishment for such a crime could range between a penalty of between ₽10,000 and ₽20,000 ($125-$250), 100 hours of community service, or 15 days of administrative detention.

The fine must be paid no later than 60 days from the date the decision comes into effect. If the fine is not paid, the offender may face additional liability for evading administrative punishment. This can include a double fine, administrative detention, or community service.