Ucom Director General Ralph Yirikian gifts Christmas presents to forcibly displaced children of NK

 16:45,

YEREVAN, JANUARY 13, ARMENPRESS. More than 1000 children aged 2-14 who were forcibly displaced from Nagorno-Karabakh and are now living in the communities of Dilijan, Ijevan, Berd, Noyemberyan and Azatamut of Tavush region and in Jermuk, Yeghegnadzor and Vayk communities of Vayots Dzor region received Christmas gifts from the national communications operator of Armenia, Ucom. The gifts were delivered to regions by Santamobiles. Director General of Ucom Ralph Yirikian and Ucom employees handed over the gifts to children at Yeghegnadzor and Ijevan cultural centers.

"We must ensure the New Year's miracle for our Artsakh compatriots. They need it very much. Supporting our compatriots forcibly displaced from Artsakh is an important commitment for us, which we carry out with great love and care. New Year is waiting for miracles and a starting point for their realization. Ucom, both as a national operator and as a company with a commitment to corporate social responsibility, will consistently fulfill at least a small part of the dreams of our children and, why not, at least a small part of the dreams of our compatriots who need help," said Director General of Ucom Ralph Yirikian.

Ralph Yirikian, Director General of Ucom, met with the governors of two regions: Vayots Dzor Governor Kolya Mikaelyan, whom he congratulated on his appointment, and Tavush Governor Hayk Ghalumyan. During the discussion with the governors, he thanked them for their support in providing aid and noted that the sectoral support will continue in those regions.

After the meetings, Ralph Yirikian, Director General of Ucom, together with Governor Kolya Mikaelyan in Vayots Dzor, and with Mayor of Ijevan Artur Chagharyan in Tavush handed over the gifts to forcibly displaced children of Nagorno-Karabakh. 

***

Ucom provides the fastest fixed and mobile communication services in Armenia. It is the absolute leader in the provision of IPTV and fixed Internet services, and also occupies the leading positions in the Armenian mobile Internet market. With modernized 4G+ and own fiber optic networks meeting the best international standards, Ucom provides a complete set of fixed and mobile communication services to more than 700,000 subscribers.




"Armenia is separating from Russia" – opinion on reforms in the National Security Service

Jan 12 2024
  • JAMnews
  • Yerevan

Opinion on reforms in the National Security Service

From January 1, 2024, the Investigation Department of the National Security Service of Armenia ceased its activity and its functions were transferred to the Investigative Committee.

It is this structure that will now deal with crimes that threaten the security of the state and society, including cases of treason, preparation and financing of terrorism.

According to lawyer Gevorg Davtyan, this decision may have a positive effect “if its goal is to reduce dependence on other countries, particularly Russia.” He believes that Armenia’s national security can be ensured only if “all the threads linking it to Russia are cut at once”.


  • “The past year has resulted in losses and brought Armenia back to square one.” Opinion
  • How will the regional configuration in the South Caucasus change? View from Baku
  • Armenia has not extradited a Russian conscript who fled because of the war in Ukraine

As part of this change, 47 positions of the Investigative Department of the NSC were transferred to the Investigative Committee. 39 of them are positions of investigators. However, only 17 of them expressed a desire to continue working outside the National Security Service.

A new department has already been formed in the Investigative Committee called “Main Department for Investigation of Crimes Threatening the Foundations of the Constitutional Order of the State and Public Security”.

According to Gevorg Baghdasaryan, advisor to the IC chairman, the department will conduct preliminary investigations into a significant number of crimes against public security, including terrorism, treason, espionage and usurpation of state power:

“The functions of the department include investigation of crimes against the order of governance, which are related to the security of the state, as well as the state border, such as illegal migration or illegal crossing of the state border.”

According to lawyer Gevorg Davtyan, nothing changes from the legal point of view, but technical changes have been made – the functions of the Investigation Department of the National Security Service are transferred to the Investigation Committee.

The National Security Service of Armenia is inherited from the USSR. In addition, its employees were educated in Russia, and in most cases they were hired only after compulsory training in the Russian Federation. He emphasizes that this was direct dependence on Russia.

“A certain element of independence seems to be emerging. The Republic of Armenia is trying to become legally fully independent and have a body that will never have any connection with another country, in this case the Russian Federation,” says Gevorg Davtyan.

The purpose of the change, in his opinion, is that from now on the Investigative Committee will perform the functions of the NSS with full rights. That is, it would act without outside influence, only under Armenia’s control, particularly in the investigation of crimes that threaten the security of the state.

“It is no coincidence that after the 44-day war in 2020, many people were charged with acts concerning crimes threatening exactly national security: sabotage, treason, agent activity, etc.”

According to the lawyer, there were also criminal cases when an employee of the National Security Service was charged with committing such crimes, and he “found protection in Russia.”

The lawyer is generally optimistic about the ongoing reforms and hopes that the changes will be qualitative:

“The legal prerequisites have been created, and the content suggests that specialists will be guided solely by the interests of national security.”


Refugee Influx Challenges Armenia

Jan 12 2024
By Mark Temnycky
The fallout from Azerbaijan’s lightning seizure of Nagorno-Karabakh still reverberates across the South Caucasus.

After several decades of conflict and thousands of dead, the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic of ethnic Armenians has ceased to exist. Last year, Azerbaijan successfully launched a surprise attack to take it by force. Hundreds of residents were killed, and many more were injured.

The Azerbaijanis declared victory and forced more than 100,000 Armenians to leave the area. (Azerbaijan denies this but the allegation has support from the European Parliament.)

These refugees now reside in the Armenian mainland. While the government is doing what it can to assist them, it is struggling with an expensive new problem at a time of limited budgets.

Even before the events of September 2023, the government was facing issues with unemployment and poverty. These problems will become even more challenging given this new influx to the country of 2.8 million people.

And their presence adds to the challenges for Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan following a major strategic defeat. While Armenia did not enter the conflict (because it would have lost) the erasure of Nagorno-Karabakh has angered nationalists.

Other problems abound. According to the World Food Programme (WFP), 23% of households face food insecurity, and 54% are “at risk of falling into food insecurity . . . in case of shocks.” Meanwhile, the World Bank reports that unemployment stands at 12.6%. The poverty rate is meanwhile 27%. In other words, the refugees may be welcome but their presence presents a problem.

The WFP has attempted to combat these issues by increasing food availability. The organization is also working with the Geneva International Centre of Humanitarian Demining so that areas within Armenia can be cleared and returned to agricultural production.

The government has offered to assist some refugees, but it is determining how to help them assimilate while juggling with financial constraints.

Recently, the government stated that it would issue pensions to residents from Nagorno-Karabakh. The program, while welcoming to older people, underlines that the state can only assist the most vulnerable. The exact amount is yet to be determined. To add to these complications, the pension will only be provided until June.

Meanwhile, many refugees are largely accommodated in communal facilities that were not designed for habitation. Often lacking heating and the creature comforts they were forced to leave behind, many are struggling to make ends meet.

They have had assistance of $250 each and another $125 for rent, where needed. But these are hardly sufficient, especially in the capital Yerevan, which also accommodates Russian exiles. The refugees nonetheless say they have been moved by the warmth of their reception from fellow Armenians.

Grim as the situation may be, there is more positive economic news which bodes well for the medium term. In December, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) projected Armenian real GDP growth of 7% in 2023 and 5% this year, even as inflation falls.

The effective cleansing of Armenians is part of a long series of forced population movements between the two former Soviet republics. When the first Nagorno-Karabakh conflict broke out during the Soviet Union’s collapse, some 700,000 Azerbaijanis were expelled from Armenia and as many as 500,000 Armenians left Azerbaijan.

Human Rights Watch says that the small numbers of Armenians now remaining should receive protection from Azerbaijan, but added that assurances from its officials were, “difficult to accept at face value after the months of severe hardships, decades of conflict, impunity for alleged crimes, in particular during hostilities, and the Azerbaijani government’s overall deteriorating human rights record.”

President Ilham Aliyev’s government seems far more concerned with the significant challenges of reintegrating the captured lands of Nagorno-Karabakh.

Some Azerbaijanis have already started to move into the area. But the integration program is far from clear.

There are numerous complications. For example, if Nagorno-Karabakh is to be integrated with the rest of Azerbaijan, then identification forms and other documents will need to be provided. How might residents obtain Azerbaijani citizenship, and what will the process entail? In addition, there are various societal matters that need to be addressed. For example, how to reopen schools and impose curriculums.

Azerbaijan may regard these as the problems of success, while Armenia deals with much tougher issues on the other side of the equation. Much needs to be done to address the numerous outstanding issues, not least the possibility of a future peace settlement to ensure the countries end the cycle of war.

Mark Temnycky is an accredited freelance journalist covering Eurasian affairs and a nonresident fellow at the Atlantic Council’s Eurasia Center. He can be found on X @MTemnycky

Europe’s Edge is CEPA’s online journal covering critical topics on the foreign policy docket across Europe and North America. All opinions are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the position or views of the institutions they represent or the Center for European Policy Analysis.

 

29 items on draft agenda of National Assembly Regular Sittings to be convened on January 15

 18:29,

YEREVAN, JANUARY 12, ARMENPRESS:  On January 12, the Council of the National Assembly presided over by the National Assembly Vice President Hakob Arshakyan convened a sitting, the parliament’s press service said in a readout.

According to the source, the draft agendas of the seventh session of the eighth convocation of the National Assembly, as well as the regular sittings to be convened on January 15 were debated and approved.

The sequence for the debate of the agenda items of the regular sittings was also set.

It is noted that 25 items were included in the draft agenda of the National Assemby regular sittings.

Amendments were made in the decisions of the National Assembly Council of October 4, October 5, October 25 018-A and 020-A of 2021.




‘Civil Contract’ nominates Karen Tumanyan for the position of member of Supreme Judicial Council

 18:18,

YEREVAN, JANUARY 12, ARMENPRESS: The 'Civil Contract' faction of the National Assembly of Armenia has nominated Karen Tumanyan for the position of a member of the Supreme Judicial Council.

 “According to Article 144.2 of the Constitutional Law the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly, the Civil Contract Faction of the National Assembly has nominated Karen Tumanyan as a candidate for the position of a member of the Supreme Judicial Council,” reads  the statement signed by the Vice President of the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia, the Acting National Assemby President Hakob Arshakyan.

Louvre’s new department for Byzantine Arts and Christianity in the East to include Armenia

 20:20,

YEREVAN, JANUARY 12, ARMENPRESS: The Louvre is preparing the opening of a new department of Byzantine Arts and Christianity in the East, including Armenia, Ambassador of France to Armenia Olivier Decottignies said in a post on X.

“The Louvre is the most visited museum in the world (9.6 million visitors per year). It is preparing the opening of a new department of Byzantine Arts and Christianity in the East, including Armenia.

 In Armenia, the Louvre is assisting in the redesign of the Erebuni Museum," the French ambassador wrote.

Nagorno-Karabakh’s abandoned capital transforms under Azerbaijani rule

eurasianet
Jan 11 2024

It's a ghost town that looms large in the minds of both Armenians, who know it as Stepanakert, and Azerbaijanis, who know it as Khankendi. 

It served for three decades as the de facto capital of the self-proclaimed, now-defunct Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (NKR).

It was home to the majority of the republic's 100,000-some population, nearly all of them Armenians, who fled to Armenia after Azerbaijan's lightning offensive to seize the whole of the NKR on September 19-20. As they fled they endured a gas explosion that killed over 200, a days-long traffic jam during which 64 people reportedly died, and faced an uncertain status once they reached their destination.

Azerbaijan never accepted the existence of the NKR, nor even the term "Nagorno-Karabakh," let alone the idea that it had a capital. But the town of Khankendi is of enormous symbolic importance for it, too, as its seizure represents the total nature of Baku's victory in Karabakh.

It was Khankendi where President Ilham Aliyev delivered his most triumphant victory speech, raised the Azerbaijani flag and mocked the detained former NKR leaders

And it was Khankendi where the victory in the 2020 war against Armenia over Karabakh was celebrated with a military parade attended by Aliyev and his family in November. 

“During these 20 years [of my presidency], I never doubted that this day would come and a military parade under the Azerbaijani flag would be held in the city of Khankendi,” he told the parade. “I once said [during the 2020 war] that without Shusha, our work would be incomplete. However, even then, I knew that without Khankendi and Khojaly, our work would be incomplete.” 

Footage posted on social media from Khankendi by a handful of Azerbaijanis with access to the town shows virtually no signs of life. According to the Armenian government, more than 100,000 people had left Nagorno-Karabakh for Armenia within the 10 days following the NKR's surrender after Azerbaijan's lightning offensive. 

In December, Azerbaijani media reported, citing the country's commission for Internally Displaced Persons affairs, that 50 Azerbaijani families, originally from Khankendi, would soon be resettled in the town. While the town served as the seat of the government of Soviet Azerbaijan's Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast (1923-91), its population was overwhelmingly Armenian with an Azerbaijani minority. Its population was 11 percent Azerbaijani according to the latest Soviet census conducted there in 1979. 

The Azerbaijani government created a "reintegration portal" for Armenians deciding to remain in their homes and accept Baku's rule. It claimed in October to have received 98 applications, but the International Committee of the Red Cross estimates that only about 20 have stayed behind. 

While Armenia says that the local Armenians' flight in the face of Azerbaijani military advance amounted to ethnic cleansing, Azerbaijani officials insist that they left by their own will, as Aliyev reiterated in an interview with Euronews in December. 

“Our public communications with Karabakh Armenians, and what we did after, demonstrated that we wanted them to stay. We openly announced that and I, during my appeal to the Azerbaijani people after the end of the anti-terror operation [the September offensive], said that they could stay,” he said. “We opened the electronic portal of registration. All of those who want to come back have this right. Their property is duly protected. All the historical and religious sites are duly protected.”

In the reports of meetings of Azerbaijani officials with Armenian residents in Karabakh for the purpose of registration, we see mainly elderly people who were likely too weak to join the exodus. 

Azerbaijan disclosed its reintegration plan for Karabakh Armenians publicly only in October, after the vast majority of the population had fled the region. Vague as it is overall, it makes one thing clear: as expected, there will be no special treatment for Armenians; they are to have the exact same legal status as Azerbaijanis or other ethnic minorities. 

“The word reintegration, which I use many times, unfortunately, was met with a kind of irony, both from the Armenian government and also from the separatists. The same separatists who now wait for the verdict in the detention center,” Aliyev said in a forum in early December. 

“We even delivered the message to them that we will have a municipal election at the end of 2024, so they will participate. They will select their representatives, who will be the leaders of the municipalities. So, what else should we have provided or offered? It was the maximum and it was totally transparent.”

He also spoke to the forum about how Azerbaijani social workers were taking care of the Armenians who stayed behind. “[Y]ou have to eat, you have to have heating, you have to have other means of living. Not many of them, I would say, remained. But those who remain, they have been taken care of and those who want to come back, they can use this mechanism,” he said. 

A few Karabakhis have mused on social media about possibly going back to their homes given the difficulties they face in settling in Armenia. 

But it's not clear how widespread or serious the intention is, especially given the social pressures against accepting Azerbaijani rule. 

When it comes to the physical landscape, as soon as it restored its sovereignty, the Azerbaijani government rid Khankendi of all flags and other attributes of the former NKR. A presidential decree established "Karabakh University" in place of what had been known as "Artsakh University" under Armenian rule. And the seats at the local stadium had been arranged in such colors as to form the NKR flag but are now arranged to spell out "Karabakh is Azerbaijan." 

 

RFE/RL Armenian Service – 01/11/2024

                                        Thursday, 


Government Funds New Plant Moved Away From Azeri Border

        • Nane Sahakian

Armenia - The site of an industrial plant built in Yersakh, June 15, 2023.


Armenia’s government approved on Thursday a concessional loan worth 3.5 billion 
drams ($8.6 million) to a U.S.-Armenian joint venture that relocated, for 
security reasons, a metallurgical plant which it began building on the border 
with Azerbaijan last year.

The construction site in Yeraskh, a border village 55 kilometers south of 
Yerevan, came under fire from nearby Azerbaijani army positions on a virtually 
daily basis in June.

The automatic gunfire, which left two Indian workers seriously wounded, began 
one week after the Azerbaijani government protested against the $70 million 
project. It claimed that building the industrial facility without its permission 
is a violation of international environmental norms. The Armenian Foreign 
Ministry brushed aside Baku’s “false” environmental concerns, saying that they 
are a smokescreen for impeding economic growth and foreign investment in Armenia.

Despite making defiant statements, Armenian and U.S. investors behind the 
project suspended work on the plant and started moving construction and 
industrial equipment from the site later in the summer.

In a statement issued after its weekly meeting in Yerevan, Prime Minister Nikol 
Pashinian’s cabinet confirmed that the facility is now being constructed just 
outside the town of Ararat, several kilometers from Yeraskh.

It said that the investors wasted 2 billion drams on the construction work in 
Yeraskh and now need additional funding. The low-interest government loan, 
repayable in four years, will be channeled into the project through a state 
investment fund, added the statement.

The plant is to process scrap metal, employ up to 500 people and have an annual 
turnover of at least $200 million. Its owners plan to finish the construction by 
the end of this year.

Areg Kochinian, a political analyst, believes that the plant’s relocation set a 
dangerous precedent for Armenia, meaning that Azerbaijan is in a position to 
disrupt economic activity in Armenian border regions by force.

“This situation could and should have been avoided. It’s a classic example of 
irresponsible administration which we have seen many times,” Kochinian said, 
commenting on the initial site of the plant located just a few hundred meters 
from an Azerbaijani army post.

Armenia’s largest gold mine also located on the border with Azerbaijan was 
likewise targeted by systematic Azerbaijani gunfire last spring. The Russian 
owner of the Sotk gold mine announced in June that it has no choice but to end 
open-pit mining operations there and put many of its 700 workers on unpaid leave.




Breach Of Armenia’s Territorial Integrity ‘Unacceptable’ To Iran

        • Ruzanna Stepanian

Armenia - Iranian Ambassador Mehdi Sobhani speaks to journalists, January 11, 
2024.


The Iranian ambassador in Yerevan, Mehdi Sobhani, on Thursday reaffirmed Iran’s 
strong support for Armenia’s territorial integrity, saying that any violation of 
it is unacceptable to Tehran.

“We have always supported Armenia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and 
anything that causes a violation of Armenia’s sovereignty and territorial 
integrity is not acceptable for us,” Sobhani told reporters.

Asked what concrete action Iran will take in case of such a violation, he said: 
“It won’t be violated.”

The remarks came amid Azerbaijan’s renewed demands for an extraterritorial 
corridor to its Nakhichevan exclave that would pass through Syunik, the sole 
Armenian province bordering Iran. Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev said on 
Wednesday that people and cargo transported to and from Nakhichevan must be 
exempt from Armenian border controls.

Last week, a Turkish government minister said that new roads and railways needed 
for the functioning of that corridor should be built by 2029. The Iranian 
Foreign Ministry responded by repeating its strong opposition to “geopolitical 
changes” in the South Caucasus.

Iran has repeatedly warned against attempts to strip it of the common border and 
transport links with Armenia. Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi reportedly told a 
visiting Azerbaijani official last October that the “Zangezur corridor” sought 
by Baku is “resolutely opposed” by the Islamic Republic.

Raisi spoke less than two weeks after Azerbaijan’s recapture of Nagorno-Karabakh 
which raised more fears in Yerevan that Baku will also attack Armenia to open 
the corridor.

Andranik Kocharian, the chairman of the Armenian parliament committee on defense 
and security, did not rule out the possibility of such an attack when he spoke 
to RFE/RL’s Armenian Service on Thursday. He said the Armenian government is 
reinforcing “every day” the county’s capacity to repel it.




Yerevan Keeps Linking Peace Deal With Border Delimitation

        • Shoghik Galstian

Armenia - A soldier at a new Armenian army post on the border with Azerbaijan, 
June 16, 2021.


Armenia continues to believe that its peace treaty with Azerbaijan should spell 
out a mechanism for delimiting the border between the two countries, a senior 
Armenian lawmaker said on Thursday, reacting to Baku’s efforts to delink the two 
issues.

“If this principle is not adopted and implemented, it will be unclear how the 
delimitation process will take place,” Sargis Khandanian, the chairman of the 
Armenian parliament committee on foreign relations, told reporters.

Khandanian also made clear that Yerevan insists on using the most recent Soviet 
military maps printed in the 1970s as a basis for ascertaining the long and 
heavily militarized Armenian-Azerbaijani border.

The leaders of the European Union and its key member states, France and Germany, 
backed this stance in a joint statement with Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian 
issued after their meeting in Spain last October.

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev reiterated Baku’s rejection of the proposed 
mechanism for border delimitation on Wednesday. He said that it favors the 
Armenian side.

“They [the Armenians] want to put aside maps of the 1960s, 1950s and 1940s and 
refer to the 1970s because our historical lands had been given to them by that 
time,” Aliyev said in a televised interview. “Therefore, we strongly opposed and 
oppose that.”

Echoing statements by other Azerbaijani officials, Aliyev said that the border 
should be delimited after the signing of the peace treaty. He did not cite any 
concrete delimitation mechanism acceptable to Baku.

Armenian analysts and opposition figures believe that Aliyev wants to leave the 
door open to Azerbaijani territorial claims to Armenia. They say this shows that 
Pashinian’s “peace agenda” regularly touted by him and his political allies 
cannot guarantee the country’s territorial integrity even after the September 
2023 fall of Nagorno-Karabakh.

The Azerbaijani leader on Wednesday again accused Armenia of occupying “eight 
Azerbaijani villages.” He referred to several small enclaves inside Armenia 
which were controlled by Azerbaijan in Soviet times and occupied by the Armenian 
army in the early 1990s. For its part, the Azerbaijani side seized at the time a 
bigger Armenian enclave.

Aliyev said that the return of those enclaves will top the agenda of an upcoming 
joint session of Armenian and Azerbaijani government commissions on border 
demarcation and delimitation. The office of Deputy Prime Minister Mher 
Grigorian, the chairman of the Armenian commission, declined to comment on 
Aliyev’s claim. Meanwhile, some opposition lawmakers in Yerevan demanded 
explanations from the government.




Armenia To Attend Another ‘Anti-Russian’ Meeting On Ukraine


MALTA – Delegates attend a meeting organised by Ukraine to discuss its peace 
formula for ending the war with Russia in an unnamed hotel in St Julian's, 
October 28, 2023.


Risking further condemnation by Russia, the secretary of Armenia’s Security 
Council will fly to Switzerland this weekend to take part in a new round of 
multilateral peace talks initiated by Ukraine.

Armen Grigorian’s office announced on Thursday his participation in the 
conference that will take place in the Swiss resort town of Davos on January 14.

Grigorian already attended the last such meeting held in Malta in October. 
Security officials from more than 60 countries converged on the island to 
discuss Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy’s plan to end the war with 
Russia. Grigorian met with Zelenskiy’s chief of staff during what Moscow 
condemned as a “blatantly anti-Russian event.”

Grigorian’s trip to Malta contrasted with Armenian leaders’ boycott of 
high-level meetings of Russian-led groupings of ex-Soviet states and highlighted 
Yerevan’s mounting tensions with Moscow. The Russian Foreign Ministry called the 
trip a “demonstrative anti-Russian gesture” and accused Prime Minister Nikol 
Pashinian’s administration of systematically “destroying” Russian-Armenian 
relations.

Despite the angry Russian reaction, Armenia kept up diplomatic contacts with 
Ukraine. The foreign ministers of the two states held talks in Brussels on 
December 11 on the sidelines of an annual meeting of the top diplomats of 
European Union member states and ex-Soviet republics involved in the EU’s 
Eastern Partnership program.

Beglium - Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan and his Ukrainian 
counterpart Dmytro Kuleba meet in Brussels, December 11, 2023.

Pashinian did not boycott fresh ex-Soviet summits that were hosted by Russian 
President Vladimir Putin in Saint Petersburg two weeks later. But his attendance 
did not seem to ease the unprecedented rift between the two longtime allies.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said later in December that Armenia is 
reorienting its foreign policy towards the West at the expense of its alliance 
with Russia. He warned that the South Caucasus country cannot successfully 
confront its grave security challenges with the help of the United States and 
the European Union.

Citing an unnamed “informed source,” Russia’s main official news agency, TASS, 
claimed on Wednesday that Germany is pressing Pashinian’s government to force 
Russian border guards out of Armenia and purge the Armenian state apparatus from 
pro-Russian elements in return for greater economic aid.

There was no official reaction to the claim from Berlin or Yerevan. While 
pledging to “diversify” Armenia’s foreign and security policy, Pashinian has so 
far indicated no plans to demand the withdrawal of Russian border guards or 
troops from Armenia.



Reposted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2024 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.

 

Armenpress: Georgia in the spotlight of tourists from the Middle East. What are the possibilities of Armenia?

 09:00,

YEREVAN, JANUARY 11, ARMENPRESS. According to statistics provided by the Georgian National Tourism Administration (GTNA) 4,703,945 tourists visited Georgia in 2022, more than 80% of them were Europeans and 4.4% were citizens of the Middle East countries.

 In the overall picture of inbound tourism, the number of visitors from the Middle East is very small but dynamics is significant in this case. According to the results of 2022, Georgia has received 208,341 tourists from the Middle East, which is 15 times more than ten years before.

Moreover, the increase in the number of visitors from the region has exceeded the pre-pandemic level. Furthermore, the former Soviet republic admitted almost 160,000 visitors from the Middle East in 2019. Georgia is popular among tourists from the Middle East not only thanks to its picturesque views, affordable hotels, and relative proximity but also because of the growing availability of halal food and Arabic-speaking guides (Middle East Monitor, 2022).

The increase in the number of visitors from the Middle East is mainly due to tourists from the Arab states of the Persian Gulf, particularly Saudi Arabia, which accounts for more than 50% of the total number of tourists from the Middle East. In 2022, the number of tourists from Saudi Arabia increased by 60% compared to the pre-pandemic period of 2019, reaching 119,921 visitors.

Let's consider how the above-mentioned success factors for Georgia work and examine the possibilities of achieving similar results in Armenia.

Citizens of only 45 countries can enter Armenia without a visa and stay in the country for up to 180 days, which is twice less than in the case of Georgia, when this opportunity is given to citizens of 107 countries (Table 4). Moreover, only citizens of two countries of the Middle East- UAE and Qatar are allowed to visit Armenia without a visa.

Unlike Georgia, in Armenia the number of direct flights from many airports of the region (Dubai, Doha, Sharjah, Abu Dhabi, Riyadh, Jeddah, Dammam) is less and they are more expensive.

The price of a round trip ticket from the mentioned cities to Armenia if booked two months before the date of departure is 82 – 470 Euros while the average price is 454 Euros.

At the same time, Armenia is considered one of the safest countries in the world, according to the Numbeo crime index as of July 2023, Armenia ranks 6th in terms of security, with a crime index of 21.6 and a safety index of 78.4. This is a notably high safety index, surpassing that of Georgia, which holds the 20th position. In terms of safety, Armenia is a much more preferred destination for tourists compared to Georgia (Numbeo, 2023).

For more information, please view the following 
https://armenpress.am/eng/news/1127765.html?fbclid=IwAR2yKI5H1dFSQJsV4CICnofsVxeFVvFFwBGlVJe-nUKmQsnzxwhslGI80A8

New Governor of Armavir named

 10:01,

YEREVAN, JANUARY 11, ARMENPRESS. Mayor of the town of Armavir Davit Khudatyan is set to be appointed Governor of Armavir Province.

The appointment is included in the agenda of the January 11 Cabinet meeting. 

Khudatyan has been the Mayor of Armavir and the President of the Armavir Regional Board of the Civil Contract Party since 2018.