March: 16, 2026
Stele was an integral part of the CP members’ power. But lying also has a limit.
The other day, Economy Minister Gevorg Papoyan was talking about last year’s salary increases, making discoveries, publishing figures unknown to official statistics, saying that we see how the average salary in Armenia is constantly increasing.
“For the first time, in December, we had an average salary of 400,000 drams, taxes included, of course.
I look at all this not with the pre-election and electoral logic, but as the economic development of our country,” the Minister of Economy insisted.
Let’s leave aside how well this statement of Gevorg Papoyan fits into the pre-election or election logic, let’s look at the figure he gave about the average salary.
But before that, let’s note that a few days ago, the Minister of Labor and Social Affairs made such a statement.
“2025 in December, the average salary in Armenia was 401 thousand drams.
Moreover, in November of the same year, that indicator was 327 thousand drams,” Arsen Torosyan advertised their recorded salary increases during the meeting with the CP faction, probably excited by their own salary gains.
Gevorg Papoyan and Arsen Torosyan are the ministers of this government who are directly related to salaries and hardly knew what the average salary in Armenia was in December. They probably knew, but they lied or gave false numbers, exaggerating the salary indicators.
The data published by the official statistics show that the average salary in Armenia in December last year was 400 thousand drams, moreover, it was not more than that.
According to official data, the average salary was much lower in December. It amounted to 376.7 thousand drams, 23.3 thousand drams less than 400 thousand.
But as we can see, this did not prevent Gevorg Papoyan, who holds the position of Minister of Economy, and Arsen Torosyan, who holds the position of Minister of Social Affairs, to talk about the average salary of 400 thousand or more than 400 thousand. Moreover, to try to create the impression that salaries are growing at a high rate.
Arsen Torosyan says that in November the average salary was 327 thousand drams, in December it became 401 thousand drams.
If Arsen Torosyan and the other officials had given them, let’s say, 17-18 million bonuses in December instead of 7-8 million, the difference would definitely be bigger. But the ministers who received millions of bonuses naturally avoid talking about it. Isn’t it clear that they won’t say that they were given millions in bonuses, that’s why average salary indicators jumped in December? But with that, they did not reach 400 thousand, as they try to present.
The average salary, after the widespread payment of bonuses in December, was much lower than intentionally, perhaps also unknowingly, these people declare. And what we see already in January of this year reveals the secret of salary growth.
In January of this year, compared to the previous month, the average salary in Armenia decreased significantly. If in December last year it was 376.7 thousand drams, in January of this year it was 293.3 thousand drams.
It decreased at once by 83.4 thousand drams or by more than 22 percent.
When we subtract the unseen high bonuses and bonuses distributed to government officials at the end of the year, we see what remains below the average salary. It is still not the real salary, it is the nominal salary, that is, before taxation.
If taxes are deducted, the real average salary is much lower. In January of this year, it was only 217 thousand drams.
This is despite the fact that the average salary in some sectors reaches 900 thousand, sometimes up to 1 million drams, which means that the salaries of hundreds of thousands of citizens in many other sectors are even much lower than the average. There are many people who receive the minimum wage, sometimes even lower.
Last year, the average salary in Armenia increased by 15.9 thousand drams. The growth is not high, only 5.5 percent, but it was also due to higher than average increases in several areas. Let’s say that the average salary in the mining industry increased by 53.5 thousand drams last year, almost 3.4 times more than the average salary.
The average salary increase in the financial system exceeded 50.6 thousand. The rate of growth is almost 3.2 times more than the average salary.
Instead, wages in many sectors of the economy have been much more modestly increased, and sometimes even decreased. And this means that there are no tangible changes in the lives of the citizens included in these groups from the high economic growth that they try to present as a world-viewing event or a world-level achievement. Not counting the fact that they are affected by inflation, increases in taxes and fees for individuals.
Imagine, in January of this year, compared to the same month last year, the average salary in Armenia increased by only 5.4 percent. At the same time, food inflation was 5.9 percent, 0.5 percentage points higher than average wage growth. It is obvious that only due to inflation, there has been a decline in the purchasing power of the society and deepening of poverty.
HAKOB KOCHARYAN
—
From the calculation of a quick victory to a long confrontation. Where will the US stand?
March: 16, 2026
The neighboring Islamic Republic of Iran has been at war with the United States and Israel for about 17 days, since the start of an undeclared war by the latter.
While the US leadership continues to make contradictory statements, stating that they are winning, then denying that statement, then emphasizing that they have destroyed the Iranian air force and leadership, the Russian side records that the plan to conquer Iran in one day has failed. Today, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov announced that the consequences of the conflict over Iran have gone beyond the regional borders of the Middle East and have reached global dimensions.
“Those who, parallel to these events, deal with the response to aggression, who carry out terrorism against energy infrastructures, oil tankers, commit terrorist acts, of course, they probably want to draw attention to themselves. But the consequences are much wider. And they are no longer regional at all, they have a global scale,” Lavrov noted.
“As for the prospects of this conflict, it is difficult to say. Recently, US President Trump said that Iran is, I quote, “totally crushed”.
And on the same day, the representative of the Israel Defense Forces announced: “We still have a thousand targets ahead of us, and we will work towards those targets at least until Pesach,” that is, at least three more weeks. Therefore, it is difficult to predict what consequences this crisis may have, how it may end, if they do not immediately stop, come to their senses and start working out agreements that will not fail this time,” Lavrov said. According to him, “guarantees are needed” for that.
“I perfectly understand that Iran needs such guarantees,” the Russian Foreign Minister added.
According to him, the plan to conquer Iran in one day has failed.
“If they expected that in one day, in a few hours, they would achieve the task of completely subjugating this state to them, then, probably, they now understand how much they were wrong, how misguided they were,” Lavrov said.
Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi also stated that the USA and Israel have already learned a good lesson by attacking Iran.
“I assume that by now they have already learned a good lesson, they have understood what kind of nation they are dealing with, a nation that will not allow itself to hesitate in terms of defense and is ready to continue the war as long as it is necessary and where it is necessary,” said Araghchi, whose words were quoted by the Iranian Foreign Ministry.
According to him, Tehran intends to continue military operations “until US President Donald Trump admits his mistake” in the military operation against the Islamic Republic.
“Our powerful armed forces will continue to fight until the US president realizes that the illegal war he has imposed on both the Americans and the Iranians is wrong and must never be repeated.” The victims should receive compensation,” Araghchi wrote on social networks. At the same time, he announced Iran’s “willingness to discuss any proposal that will lead to a just end to the war.”
168.amin a conversation with Russian analyst Vladimir Yevseyev said that the US-Israeli attack on Iran is a classic example of how great powers miscalculate the adversary’s military-political resistance and the regional environment.
According to him, in the first phase of the attack, they acted in the scenario of applying quick pressure and achieving a quick result. at the initial stage of the attack, the US and Israel were guided by the calculation that quick and intense military strikes would force Iran to retreat quickly, because they assumed that Iran’s military infrastructure could be hit quickly, Iran would not want a large-scale escalation, and regional actors would not intervene.
However, under the leadership of Vladimir Yevseyev, the problem began at the stage when Iran turned the war into a full-scale escalation and a full-scale war, responding to the US-Iranian military operation with the psychology of a full-scale war.
He also believes that the miscalculation also referred to the underestimation of Iran’s resistance network, Iran’s strategy is not based only on the army, but also on regional partners.
“In Washington, perhaps, it was assumed that it was possible to increase military pressure as much as necessary, while maintaining control over it. However, in reality, in such conflicts, the opponent often responds not at the same level, but with disproportionate steps, which violates the initial calculations.
Another miscalculation is misjudging the regional environment, the Middle East is a complex region that has changed a lot in recent years as well. In this environment, it is difficult even for the great powers. Therefore, because of all this, the attempt to get a quick strategic result turned into a long and more complicated conflict. This will be extended, I think, until Iran receives certain guarantees,” Vladimir Yevseyev said.
In his assessment, a prolonged military confrontation is not in the interests of any side, but it is definitely not in the interest of the United States, which will find it difficult to fight a long war in a war that is very expensive due to the distance.
“I think, however, this war will not have direct consequences for the South Caucasus if the regional countries continue their current positions, although I think Iran would like to get more support from all partner countries and is conducting even more active diplomacy at this stage. Henceforth, the expanding influence of the US in the South Caucasus will be an even bigger problem for Iran, negotiating with which the US hit Iran twice,” said Vladimir Yevseyev.
—
Now it is about the survival of Iran and neighboring countries, including Armenia. A:
March: 16, 2026
168TVof “Trigger” the guest of the program Russian political scientist, doctor of historical sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences Ye. Alexander Krylov is a senior researcher at the Caucasus Department of the Primakov Institute of World Economy and International Relations.:
During the program, we discuss a number of current topics, for example, the projects of analysis of Armenian-Turkish history textbooks implemented with the support of Western foundations and the possible impact of such initiatives on the historical policy and educational system of Armenia, research on the formation of public opinion on the issue of the opening of the Armenian-Turkish border and the regulation of relations, the role of international grant programs and their impact on the country’s political discourse.
The campaigns against the Metsamor nuclear power plant and the issue of Armenia’s energy security, as well as the competition between Russia and the USA for the construction of a new nuclear power plant and the technological risks of the proposed projects, were considered separately.
Sociological surveys on trust in key institutions, regional transport and energy projects, security issues in Syunik, the South Azerbaijan factor and possible geopolitical competition around Iran in the South Caucasus are also at the center of the discussion.
Hayk Derzyan
—
Armenia PM congratulates Kazakhstan president on constitutional referendum
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan sent a congratulatory message to Kazakhstan President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev on the successful holding of the constitutional referendum, the PM’s office said in a readout.
Pashinyan congratulated Tokayev on the vote, describing it as a fundamental step toward building the “Fair Kazakhstan” proclaimed by the president.
He said the results of the popular vote once again demonstrated the responsible attitude of Kazakhstan’s citizens in ensuring the country’s independence and sovereignty and in building a prosperous and modern society governed by the rule of law.
Pashinyan also expressed confidence that the constitutional reforms in Kazakhstan would give new impetus to the strategic partnership between Yerevan and Astana and contribute to strengthening friendship between the two nations.
He wished Tokayev success in his state activities, as well as good health and prosperity.
Published by Armenpress, original at
—
EAM Jaishankar thanks Armenia for the successful evacuation of 550 Indians fro
The External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar thanked “the people of Armenia” for facilitating the successful evacuation of 550 Indian nationals from Iran.
In a post on X, Jaishankar wrote, “Thank the Government and the people of Armenia for facilitating the safe evacuation of over 550 Indian nationals from Iran so far. Appreciate their support in these challenging times. @AraratMirzoyan.”
Earlier, the Jammu and Kashmir Students Association said that more than 70 Indian students, majority of them from Jammu and Kashmir, who were stranded in Iran amid the ongoing war situation in the region, have returned safely to India via a connecting journey through Armenia and Dubai, following a coordinated evacuation effort.
The Association said that these students had been stranded in Iran due to the ongoing war-like situation and deteriorating security conditions in the region, and are now returning safely to India.
It further said that most of the students travelling in this batch are studying at Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, and other universities across Iran. Before boarding the flight, the students travelled by buses from different cities in Iran and undertook a long land journey to Armenia, reaching Zvartnots International Airport in Yerevan to board the evacuation flight.
Diplomatic channels between New Delhi, Yerevan, and Tehran coordinated closely to help facilitate the evacuation successfully.
Meanwhile, as the conflict entered its third week the Israeli Air Force (IsAF) has successfully targeted and destroyed the aircraft used by the Iranian leadership at Mehrabad International Airport in Tehran, marking a significant blow to the regime’s strategic mobility.
In a post on X, the air force confirmed the strike, stating that they “destroyed the plane of the leader of the Iranian terror regime at the ‘Mehrabad’ airport in Tehran.”
The aircraft was identified as a critical logistics and diplomatic tool used by the former Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, additional senior officials from the terror regime, and elements in the Iranian military.
The IsAF noted that the plane was vital to “advance military procurement and manage relations with Axis countries through domestic and international flights”. Consequently, the mission was specifically designed to disrupt the operational synergy between Tehran and its regional allies.
According to military officials, “the destruction of the plane impairs the ability to coordinate between the leadership of the Iranian terror regime and Axis countries, in building military power, and in the regime’s rehabilitation capability.”
By eliminating this high-value target, Israel has significantly hindered the regime’s ability to maintain its military and diplomatic networks, asserting that “another strategic asset has been removed from the Iranian regime”.
This high-profile strike was part of a broader, intensive aerial campaign. The IAF on Sunday (local time) said it struck more than 200 targets across western and central Iran over the past day, targeting military infrastructure, including missile systems, defence installations, and operational headquarters.
This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever.
https://www.mid-day.com/news/india-news/article/jaishankar-thanks-armenia-for-evacuating-550-indian-nationals-from-iran-iaf-strikes-khameneis-plane-23621066
—
The government is going on an adventure. After the elections, even a flood
March: 15, 2026
Ignoring the warning of the Ministry of Finance, the government, as always, guided by political expediency, decided to increase pensions.
The increase of pensions, no matter how much it is necessary, is not provided with financial means, because from the beginning the government did not allocate money for it in the state budget. They raised it on assumptions. One thing that has worried the Ministry of Finance in terms of what these expenses will be paid for. Especially since we are talking about quite serious money.
According to the government’s calculations, almost 79 billion drams are needed to increase pensions and benefits. After approving the budget, that amount was not included in the expenses. In accordance with the projected incomes of the budget, they set the expenses, which, however, do not include the 79 billion drams needed for raising pensions.
Based on that, the Ministry of Finance has warned that in this way they are creating risks for the budgets of this and future years.
“Taking into account the political and social resonance of the presented proposal, nevertheless, from the point of view of fiscal stability, we consider it necessary to note that in this case it refers to 2026. and about the significant increase in current expenses for the following years, which will lead to significant inertial increases in the social expenses of the base budget in the following years and will significantly limit the opportunities of the RA government to spend in other directions.
If we add to the latter the existing fiscal restrictions, as well as significant fiscal pressures on current expenses arising from the universal health insurance system and additional spending needs generated in many other directions in 2026. and for the following years, we consider the presented proposal to be quite risky,” the Ministry of Finance had warned about the government’s initiative to increase pensions, but the government ignored that warning.
Meanwhile, the risks related to fiscal stability mean that the budget may face problems in servicing these expenses, because the financial sources that will be used to pay for the increase in pensions are not known. Especially, the hasty introduction of health insurance increased the burden on the budget. Budgetary funds intended for that purpose may run out in the middle of the year, as was usually the case with state orders, and additional funds may be needed. It is not known where the money will be taken from.
It was not enough, without financial security, they decided to increase pensions and add a completely new burden to the budget. The risk of losing power forced them to take that step, and now, in hindsight, they have started looking for funds to pay the pensions.
They say that we have additional expectations of tax revenues. The question arises, if there were such expectations, why were they not included in the state budget approved just a few months ago?
There are 2 options: those expectations are false and unfounded, or they were deliberately hidden at the time.
The most likely thing is that there were no such expectations, they could not have arisen in such a short time. Just before the elections, they decided to create false grounds for raising pensions.
What will they do if those expectations do not come true tomorrow? At the moment, there is no reason to claim that the budget revenues will be more than planned and that they will cover the costs of raising pensions.
The other question is what will happen if these revenues are not received, should we say that the increase of pensions should be done retrospectively?
Naturally, until the elections do something, they will cut money here and there to cover the costs of raising pensions. After the elections, the risks that the budget may face with servicing the entire financial burden are quite real. And at that time, both the payment of pensions and the fulfillment of other budget expenses will become problematic.
It is an adventure to put the budget in front of such danger for political purposes. But it is not for today’s rulers of Armenia.
Without grounds and justifications, they claim that 40 billion of the 79 billion necessary for increasing pensions will be filled at the expense of additional taxes from the budget. Where did they get that the tax revenues of the approved budget will exceed by 40 billion? Nikol Pashinyan is so entangled in his lies that he makes blatantly false statements at the government meeting. He says that last year we collected 30 billion drams more tax revenue than planned, and none of the members of the government dares to correct his “innocent” mistake. According to last year’s approved budget, they planned to collect 2 trillion 720 billion drams, they collected 2 trillion 725 billion in taxes. They didn’t make a single 30 billion overdraft. Where did he get that the tax revenues of the budget exceeded by 30 billion last year?
With such false justifications, they cherish the hope that this year they will collect at least 40 billion drams more in taxes than planned and with that amount they will cover half of the costs of increasing pensions. The first 2 months of the tax year are already in the past and the taxes collected in those months do not give such grounds at all. What’s more, in the near future, both economic and budgetary problems may worsen due to regional instability and the expected activation of internal political processes in Armenia.
They intend to take the other half of the money needed for increasing pensions from the reserve fund. They forgot what the reserve fund is for.
The reserve fund is for stabilizing the country’s economic and financial situation in case of force majeure. And what are the current rulers of Armenia doing? They are trying to solve their political and reproduction problems with the reserve fund money, ignoring possible future dangers.
HAKOB KOCHARYAN
—
Yerevan 2026: Landmark triumph for European Shooting
The continental 10m competition concluded on Wednesday with Ukraine topping the table ahead of forty national federations. Over 350 athletes showcased precision in high-stakes challenge formats, delivering a transformative week for the discipline.
Ukraine emerged as the dominant force of the tournament, topping the overall medal table with an impressive total of 14 medals, including five golds. Viltorya Rybovalova alone won three gold medals, one in women’s moving targets moxed event and two more in teams. In the final standings, Ukraine was followed by Norway and Hungary, each with five gold medals. Hungary’s Veronika Major also won three gold medals, including one in the Olympic air pistol womens category.
Norway’s position was bolstered by Pernille Nor-Woll, who delivered a career-defining performance by setting a new European Record in the senior air rifle women’s final after already securing the Junior title.
In the pistol events, Anton Aristarkhov (AIN) proved untouchable by becoming a double individual champion, while Türkiye enjoyed significant success, punctuated by a dramatic final-day victory for the legendary Yusuf Dikeç and his teammates in the air pistol trio.
The introduction of the ESC Challenge and trio formats brought a theatrical flair to the competition, with many finals decided by the narrowest of margins. Both the men’s and women’s air rifle solo gold medal matches ended in 15-14 scores, with Croatia’s Josip Sikavica and Türkiye’s Damla Köse emerging victorious in these high-pressure duels.
The Karen Demirchyan Complex also provided the stage for a transformative performance by the Armenian national team, which finished fourth in the overall medal standings. This success was anchored by a remarkable coincidence as two different athletes named Lilit Mkrtchyan dominated the moving target disciplines. The senior Lilit Mkrtchyan solidified her status as a continental force by claiming her forth European title, while her younger namesake mirrored this excellence by securing gold medals in both the individual and team junior categories.
The Armenian success was rounded off on the final day as the men’s air pistol trio, featuring Zaven Igityan, Benik Khlghatyan, and Gevorg Melkonyan, fought through a tense bronze medal match to ensure the host nation remained a top force until the final shot.
Beyond the moving target range, the emotional peak of the championships occurred during the air pistol solo women’s final. Local favourite Elmira Karapetyan, competing while seven months pregnant, displayed extraordinary composure to secure a silver medal. The achievement drew thunderous applause from the Yerevan crowd and was described by observers as an inspiring testament to the resilience of elite athletes.
Reflecting on her path to the podium, Karapetyan noted the immense physical challenge. “Actually, it was very difficult to prepare. No one can imagine how complicated this process is,” she stated. “But I am very happy that I have a medal. I am very excited that I managed to shoot this competition.”
Despite the enthusiastic local support, Karapetyan admitted the pressure of competing on home soil. “The home walls do not help shooting, I would say they rather hinder, because you feel more responsible,” she explained. However, she expressed immense pride in her achievement. “I do not think my silver medal is somehow less than gold, knowing my path and how I reached it. I am satisfied with my result, simply that girl shot better.”
Looking ahead, she confirmed her sights will set on the Los Angeles 2028 Olympic cycle, only after she welcomes her child and completes her recovery. The flawless execution of the championships was the result of long-term planning. Secretary General of the Armenian Shooting Federation, Areg Saribekyan, detailed the extensive preparations required to bring the event to reality.
“The initiative started about two years ago. It was a unique dream for all the athletes, the staff, and the federation,” Saribekyan explained. “The president of the federation started taking active steps, cooperating with state bodies, because we realised what an important event this is.”
The effort clearly paid dividends, with international delegates praising the host nation. “All teams are very satisfied,” Saribekyan noted. “They were surprised by our Armenian hospitality, which is simple for us but extraordinary for them. They mentioned they would be very happy if we organised other events too, especially since about 98 percent of the participants visited Armenia for the first time.”
In an interview with Inside The Games, Alexander Ratner, president of the European Shooting Confederation, reflected on the historic significance of the Yerevan event. Ratner admitted that the bid from the Armenian Federation was both unexpected and remarkably ambitious.
“The European Shooting Confederation received a proposal from the Armenian Shooting Federation to hold such a large tournament right here only two years ago,” Ratner explained. “For many, this was an ambitious challenge as never before shooting competitions of such scale have been organized in the country. Now we can say with confidence that our Armenian friends have undoubtedly met this challenge. The championship was a great success.”
Ratner highlighted the atmosphere as a key indicator of the event’s victory, “Athletes are satisfied, we as organisers are satisfied, and I think the Armenian side is also satisfied. It was pleasant that the championship was visited by many guests and many residents of Yerevan. I think this is a good sign that there is interest in this sport and such a large event.”
He also highlighted the crucial support provided by the national leadership, stating, “We are grateful to the Government of the Republic of Armenia. The Prime Minister was personally present at the opening. We know that he was the initiator of this idea. We are also grateful to the Ministry of Education, Science, Culture and Sport, and of course, the Armenian Shooting Federation, who made maximum efforts to ensure that everyone was truly satisfied.”
Looking to the future, Ratner noted that while the ESC calendar is largely fixed until 2029, the door remains open for Armenia to host again, “I hope that this championship has left behind what we call a legacy for the development of shooting sports in the country.
The presence of ISSF President Luciano Rossi further validated the tournament’s success. Given the often strained relationship between the ESC and the ISSF leadership, Rossi’s visit to Yerevan was closely watched.
Addressing this tension, Ratner noted, “The President of the International Federation was at the opening, he visited the competitions, and we provided him with the opportunity to present medals and reward the winners and medallists. Judging by the publication on the ISSF website, the President gave a high assessment of the organisation of the championship and the efforts of both the European Confederation and the Armenian Federation. In general, we can speak of a certain positive effect from the visit of the President of the International Shooting Sport Federation.”
Addressing this tension, Ratner noted, “The ISSF President was among guests at the opening, he visited the competitions, we provided him with the opportunity to present medals and reward the winners. Judging by the publication on the ISSF website, we can speak of a certain positive effect from the visit of Mr. Rossi to our Championship”.
In the interview with the ISSF’s official website, Rossi stated that the commitment shown by the Armenian authorities, together with the excellent work of the national federation and the European Shooting Confederation, has ensured the successful organisation of this European Championship.
“Armenia has demonstrated that it is fully capable of hosting major international competitions at the highest level,” told Rossi. This successful staging has strengthened Armenia’s position within the international shooting community and created a permanent legacy for the sport as the federation turns its focus toward the Los Angeles 2028 Olympic cycle.
—
The Armenian Diaspora and Electoral Influence Ahead of 2026
Armenia is approaching what may become one of the most consequential electoral cycles since the political transformation that followed the 2018 Velvet Revolution. The parliamentary elections scheduled for June 7, 2026, will take place amid continued security uncertainty, shifting geopolitical alignments, and unresolved debates over governance reform, foreign policy orientation, and national identity. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s ruling party is expected to seek reelection, while opposition forces, some connected to established political figures from earlier administrations and others representing newer critical voices, are preparing to challenge the government and offer alternative approaches. Although electoral outcomes will ultimately be determined by voters physically present within Armenia, the country’s vast diaspora, numbering several times the domestic population, remains a powerful political stakeholder. Despite their exclusion from formal participation at the ballot box, diaspora communities continue to shape the national conversation through media, advocacy, fundraising, and transnational networks, amplifying debates over the country’s direction and policies.
The Armenian diaspora, estimated at five to seven million people, significantly exceeds Armenia’s domestic population of roughly three million. Large communities in Russia, the United States, France, and the Middle East operate within distinct political and media environments. These contexts shape how diaspora Armenians interpret developments in Armenia and how they seek to influence them. Diaspora engagement has historically taken the form of remittances, philanthropy, lobbying, and participation in transnational media networks. Following the 2020 war and the 2023 displacement of Armenians from Nagorno Karabakh, diaspora mobilization intensified, often in explicitly political terms.
Under Armenia’s current electoral framework, citizens abroad cannot vote. The law requires physical presence in Armenia on election day. Policymakers have historically justified this restriction by citing administrative feasibility, verification challenges, and security risks associated with overseas or electronic voting. Critics argue that the exclusion of citizens abroad creates a democratic deficit, particularly given that more ethnic Armenians live outside the country than within it.
The absence of enfranchisement has not rendered the diaspora politically neutral. Instead, it has redirected political engagement into informal but consequential channels. Diaspora actors operate through media ecosystems, fundraising networks, protest mobilization, and foreign policy advocacy. These arenas are often structured around well-established institutions with longstanding ideological identities and transnational reach.
The 2021 parliamentary elections illustrate this dynamic. In the weeks preceding the June 20 snap vote, nearly forty-seven diaspora organizations issued a coordinated public endorsement urging support for the opposition Armenia Alliance (founded in 2021 and led by former President of Armenia Robert Kocharyan). Although diaspora groups do not participate directly in elections, the episode demonstrated their willingness to articulate explicit political preferences and intervene in Armenia’s domestic debate from abroad. It also highlighted the role of highly organized networks in shaping diaspora messaging.
Diaspora-run media platforms reinforce this influence. Publications such as The Armenian Weekly, Zartonk Media, and Asbarez in the United States, Nouvelles d’Arménie Magazine in France, and Yerkramas in Russia serve as hubs for commentary and mobilization. Their coverage frequently circulates inside Armenia, especially during politically sensitive periods. Many of these outlets have given substantial space to criticism of Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s post-war security policies, negotiation strategy with Azerbaijan, and broader geopolitical positioning.
Organized political structures amplify this ecosystem. The Armenian Revolutionary Federation maintains a uniquely transnational presence. Domestically, it holds parliamentary representation as part of the opposition Armenia Alliance. Internationally, it operates one of the most extensive Armenian organizational networks in the world, including youth federations, educational institutions, cultural associations, and advocacy arms across North America, Europe, Russia, and the Middle East. This dual structure enables it to function simultaneously as a domestic parliamentary actor and as a global mobilizing force. During periods of political crisis, ARF-affiliated structures abroad have articulated positions critical of the government’s territorial negotiations and national security approach, reinforcing opposition narratives through coordinated messaging.
In the United States, the Armenian National Committee of America remains one of the most prominent Armenian-American advocacy organizations. It does not participate directly in Armenian elections, but it shapes U.S. policy toward Armenia and regional security issues. Its campaigns often intersect with Armenia’s domestic political debates. Since 2020, ANCA has issued statements critical of aspects of the Armenian government’s negotiation process while pressing U.S. lawmakers on humanitarian assistance, sanctions enforcement, and security support.
An individual affiliated with ANCA, who requested anonymity, explained that their focus ahead of the 2026 elections will not be direct intervention in Armenian party politics but rather public awareness and advocacy. “Our responsibility is to inform and mobilize the Armenian American community about what is at stake,” the interlocutor stated. “Many of us are deeply dissatisfied with the government’s recent actions, especially on security issues. We cannot vote, but we can shape opinion, advocate in Washington, and ensure that policymakers understand the concerns of our community.” The comment reflects a broader pattern of diaspora engagement that emphasizes influence through information and foreign policy advocacy rather than formal electoral participation.
Comparative experience across the post-Soviet space underscores that diaspora enfranchisement is politically consequential. Moldova has expanded overseas voting through embassy based polling stations, and turnout from abroad has at times played a decisive role, often favoring reformist and pro-European platforms. Ukraine’s foreign ministry has been working on mechanisms to enable citizens abroad to vote in future elections once martial law is lifted, including discussions about digital voting systems. Georgia, by contrast, has moved to restrict overseas voting mechanisms and eliminate certain polling arrangements abroad, citing concerns about electoral vulnerability and foreign influence. Critics argue that these measures disproportionately affect migrant voters. These cases demonstrate that decisions about diaspora voting are rarely technical. They reflect broader struggles over legitimacy, political control, and national identity.
Armenia’s approach has so far favored restriction. Yet this does not shield domestic politics from diaspora influence. Instead, it produces a paradox. A globally dispersed population lacks ballots but retains the capacity to shape discourse, mobilize resources, and influence foreign governments whose policies affect Armenia directly. Political parties inside Armenia increasingly calibrate their messaging with diaspora narratives in mind, particularly on questions of security, sovereignty, and geopolitical alignment.
As Armenia approaches the 2026 parliamentary elections, the diaspora will remain politically engaged but institutionally excluded. Its influence will be measured not in votes cast but in narratives amplified, funds mobilized, advocacy campaigns launched, and international partnerships shaped. Whether Armenia eventually adopts an overseas voting mechanism or maintains its current framework, the relationship between the state and its global nation will remain central to the country’s democratic trajectory. The Armenian diaspora may not vote in 2026. It will nonetheless participate in shaping the political environment in which those votes are cast.
Contributed by Davit Gasparyan who researches security and political dynamics in the South Caucasus and Russia’s regional strategy. He conducts research with Harvard’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs and previously served as a Russia researcher at the Institute for the Study of War. He has also worked with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
—
Macron urges Iran to stop strikes at regional countries, calls for diplomatic
French President Emmanuel Macron said Sunday that a diplomatic solution is “more necessary than ever” to put an end to the Middle East escalation and preserve peace.
Macron said he spoke by phone with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian.
“I stressed the need for Iran to immediately cease its strikes against countries in the region. Iran must also guarantee freedom of navigation by ending the de facto closure of the Strait of Hormuz,” the French President said.
“I reiterated our deep concern regarding the development of Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs and all of its destabilizing activities in the region, which are at the root of the current crisis. A diplomatic solution is more necessary than ever to address these crucial challenges, end the escalation and preserve peace. We agreed to stay in touch,” Macron added in a post on X.
The U.S. and Israel launched what they described as a pre-emptive strike against Iran on February 28, claiming that Tehran was developing a nuclear weapon and posing a threat—an allegation Iran has denied. In response, Iran launched counterattacks, firing missiles and drones at Israel, as well as at U.S. assets and other targets across the Middle East.
Published by Armenpress, original at
—
Iran denies drone attacks on Azerbaijan, Türkiye and Cyprus
Iran denied on Monday that its military launched drones or missiles toward Azerbaijan, Türkiye or Cyprus last week.
Al Jazeera quoted Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei as saying that “no offensives were initiated from Iranian territory” against these countries.
He also suggested some of the reported attacks may have been “staged”, saying “we have warned repeatedly that the enemy may stage certain attacks to drive a wedge between us and other countries.”
A British military base in Cyprus was hit by a drone strike on March 2, prompting several European nations to dispatch warships to protect the island. Days later, NATO air defenses intercepted what the alliance described as an Iranian ballistic missile heading toward Türkiye. On March 5, drone strikes hit near the airport and a local school in Azerbaijan’s Nakhchivan exclave. Iran denied launching the drones, indicating that it could have been an Israeli false-flag operation.
The U.S. and Israel launched what they described as a pre-emptive strike against Iran on February 28, claiming that Tehran was developing a nuclear weapon and posing a threat—an allegation Iran has denied. In response, Iran launched counterattacks, firing missiles and drones at Israel, as well as at U.S. assets and other targets across the Middle East.
Published by Armenpress, original at
—