Swedish parliamentary delegation visits Armenia

Armenia15:58, 8 April 2026
Read the article in: العربيةFrançaisՀայերենRussian

The Third Deputy Speaker of Sweden’s Parliament (Riksdag), Kerstin Lundgren, led a working group to Armenia on Tuesday and Wednesday as part of the democratic development cooperation program between the legislative bodies of the two countries, the parliament’s press service reported. 

 First Deputy Speaker Kenneth G. Forslund was also part of the delegation. Armenian Deputy Speaker Ruben Rubinyan led the working group from the Armenian side.

The program aims to develop democratic institutions and promote democratic values. The core of the cooperation is the exchange of experiences among parliamentarians, the strengthening of contacts, and the development of inter-parliamentary relations.

During the visit, the parties held discussions on topics such as “Relations between Parliament/MPs and Civil Society Organizations,” “The Role of Parliament in Security Issues,” “The Role of the Judicial System and Courts,” and “Gender Equality in Parliament.” The delegation also met with Artur Atabekyan, President of the Supreme Judicial Council of Armenia, and Arman Dilanyan, President of the Constitutional Court of Armenia.

Read the article in: العربيةFrançaisՀայերենRussian

Published by Armenpress, original at 

Estonian Foreign Minister to visit Armenia on official trip

Armenia21:27, 8 April 2026
Read the article in: العربيةفارسی FrançaisՀայերենRussian

On April 9–10, Estonian Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna will pay an official visit to Armenia, the Armenian Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

A meeting with Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan will be held at the MFA on April 10, followed by a joint press conference.

Read the article in: العربيةفارسی FrançaisՀայերենRussian

Published by Armenpress, original at 

Verelq: A tough conversation took place behind closed doors

“Hraparak” daily writes:


Official Moscow, according to the news that reached us, has realized that it is not possible to reach any agreement with Nikol Pashinyan, and has taken practical steps.


In particular, the Kremlin decided to ban all businesses, companies, and even cultural organizations affiliated with the Pashinyan government from entering Russia. Yesterday it was said that the license of the Proshyan brandy factory, which used to export alcoholic beverages to Russia, was suspended.


Even Gurgen Arsenyan, who has established quite warm relations with the Russians, and his entourage have found themselves in “persona non grata” status.

Stepanakert is the target of Azerbaijani attacks, distortion and misappropriation

“Stepanakert, the capital of Artsakh, was and continues to be at the center of Azerbaijani vandalism policy. Stepanakert, as the center of Artsakh’s statehood and identity, has been and continues to be subjected to appropriation, desecration, Islamization and direct destruction in recent years,” warns the website monumentwatch.org, which monitors Artsakh’s cultural heritage.


“As a result of the wars, genocidal acts and ethnic cleansing of 2020-2023, many monuments were destroyed by Azerbaijan throughout the territory of Artsakh, but it is especially important to record that Stepanakert, the capital of Artsakh, was and continues to be at the center of Azerbaijani vandalism policy.


Stepanakert, as the center of Artsakh’s statehood and identity, has been and continues to be subjected to appropriation, desecration, Islamization and direct destruction in recent years. As a result of many studies and monitoring activities, the team of Artsakh cultural heritage monitoring project has found out cases of destruction of a number of monuments in the city in recent years. These processes were also not free from the rhetoric of the President of Azerbaijan, Ilham Aliyev, promoting racial hatred. In particular, on December 21, 2023, President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev, speaking at the stadium of Stepanakert, announced that “Khankendi (Stepanakert) is an old Azerbaijani region. This village was founded by the Khan of Karabakh, and after that, a large city was created by Azerbaijani architects and builders with the funds of the Republic of Azerbaijan. It is obvious that the speech of the President of Azerbaijan contains blatant falsifications and distortions of historical facts, and the “Azerbaijanization” of the identity and history of many settlements of Artsakh, as well as the city of Stepanakert, is part of the Armenian-hating policy of this country’s regime.


As for the destruction of unique historical evidence, let’s note that the Azerbaijani side destroyed the historical district in the center of Stepanakert, whose houses were built in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The monuments erected in memory of the Armenian Genocide and the heroic battles of Artsakh were also destroyed. The Armenian writing on the wall next to the bell tower-monument erected in 2015 in memory of the victims of the Armenian Genocide has been erased.


In February 2025, the Azerbaijani side caused significant damage and desecrated a number of tombstones in the Stepanakert memorial complex. In particular, the faces, eyes and mouth of the freedom fighters depicted on some tombstones were deliberately carved and erased. Some tombstones are also broken.


In addition, projects of new cultural infrastructures are being developed in the city, which are done by destroying the Armenian language. In particular, on July 20, 2025, President Ilham Aliyev presented to the participants of the III Global Media Forum held in Shushi the plan to build a “Victory Museum” in Stepanakert (Azerbaijan’s official name is “Khankendi”), which, according to the president’s statement, will be located in the building of the “Former Party Committee of the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region” (the presidential seat of the Republic of Artsakh).


On September 2, 2025, the Independence Day of the Republic of Artsakh, the Azerbaijani side demolished the building of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Artsakh in the center of Stepanakert, which was an architectural structure created in the 50s of the last century and included in the list of monuments of the Republic of Artsakh.


In February 2024, Azerbaijanis destroyed the memorial stone of Ashot Ghulyan (Bekor), which was made by the sculptor Yuri Samvelyan, within the framework of the 1996 Artsakh Annual Symposium, as well as the Artsvi monument, built in the 1960s in the Upper Park of Stepanakert, built during the Soviet era and a symbol of Stepanakert residents’ childhood. The statue of Soviet statesman-politician, intellectual and literary scholar Alexander Myasnikyan, which was carved by sculptor Yuri Hovhannisyan, was also destroyed on Martuni Street in Stepanakert. Azerbaijan also destroyed the bust of Charles Aznavour in the Armenian-French friendship park in Stepanakert. On February 16, 2024, the Azerbaijani side removed the bust of Admiral Ivan Isakov in the city of Stepanakert. In the city, Azerbaijan destroyed the monument of famous Armenian artist Hovhannes Aivazovsky, made by famous Russian sculptor Salavat Shcherbakov.


On January 10, 2023, in the city of Stepanakert, Artsakh district, the bust of former Chief of the General Staff of the Defense Army of the Republic of Artsakh, Lieutenant General Anatoly Zinevich was destroyed. The statue of Stepan Shahumyan, a public and political figure of the Armenian SSR, was also targeted for destruction.


In Stepanakert, the Azerbaijani side is also destroying whole districts of the city. This is noticeable in the vicinity of Artsakh State University, where apartment buildings and private houses have been demolished, and the university building has been “reconstructed” and changed (for details, see: Under the pretext of creating a “new university” of Azerbaijan, Artsakh State University is being demolished and disfigured…). Also noticeable is the tendency to change the external image of the city, the complete complexes, which is done by carrying out large-scale destruction in different parts of the city. The private property of citizens deported from Stepanakert is being demolished with all their property.


After the demolition of the National Assembly building in 2023. On July 5, Ilham Aliyev laid the foundations of a new administrative building on the site of the demolished National Assembly and Union of Freedom Fighters buildings.


The Azerbaijani side also started the reconstruction works of one of the central streets of Stepanakert, Azatamartiki Avenue. Let’s emphasize that the city’s music college, adjacent buildings, and construction equipment are standing near the Stepanakert geological museum.


In addition, let’s also note that the Azerbaijani side also knocked down the 50-meter illuminated cross on one of the hills near the village of Dashushen near Stepanakert.


Recently, the data on the destruction of Stepanakert was also supplemented with the data of the biannual Google Earth updates made by the Artsakh Culture and Tourism Center. in particular, the monuments of heroes of the Great Patriotic War: Marshal Hovhannes Baghramyan, pilot Nelson Stepanyan, cultural figures: Henrikh Barkhudaryan, Hovhannes Tumanyan, Khachatur Abovyan, Vahram Papazyan, human rights defender Andrey Sakharov, participants of the liberation movement and defenders of the homeland: Kristapor Ivanyan, Yuri Poghosyan, Alexander Tsaturyan were destroyed.


Our response


Actions of Azerbaijan against the monuments of Stepanakert contradict the 1972 UNESCO. Articles 4 and 5 of the Convention “On the Protection of World Cultural and Natural Heritage”. Accordingly, each state is obliged to recognize, protect and preserve the cultural heritage on its territory for future generations. Deliberate destruction of heritage or failure to take necessary measures for its preservation is a gross violation of the state’s international obligations.


As a result of the wars, genocidal acts and ethnic cleansing of 2020-2023, many monuments were destroyed by Azerbaijan throughout the territory of Artsakh, but the statue is especially important.


Attempts to appropriate and privatize the cultural layers of the city violate UNESCO’s 1970 Convention “On Measures to Prohibit and Prevent Illegal Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Values”. In particular, according to Article 11 of the Convention, the forcible change of ownership of cultural values ​​by the occupier is considered illegal.


The destruction of the cultural heritage of Stepanakert also affects the spiritual heritage of the population, which is protected by UNESCO’s 2003 With the Convention “On Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage”. The change and “Islamization” of the historical environment of the city aims to eliminate the social and cultural memory associated with these places, which is contrary to the convention’s principle of respecting cultural identity.


Furthermore, targeting cultural heritage violates the provisions of the Faroe Convention (On the Value of Cultural Heritage to Society). This document states that everyone has the right to use cultural heritage and participate in its preservation. The systematic destruction of the Armenian trace deprives the Armenian people of the realization of their cultural rights and is considered as a violation of human rights.


A key requirement of the Convention is that the protection of cultural heritage is directly related to human rights and democracy.


Azerbaijan, as a state, is obliged to recognize that everyone has the right to use cultural heritage and contribute to its enrichment. The Convention emphasizes the right of society to participate in the preservation of its heritage. The targeting or destruction of Armenian monuments in Stepanakert violates the fundamental right of Artsakh Armenians to participate in their cultural life.


The document requires states to protect heritage as an essential element of society’s identity and historical memory.


As a member of the Council of Europe and a potential party to the convention (or a state guided by its principles), Azerbaijan bears responsibility for respecting cultural diversity and preserving heritage in the territories under its control, regardless of its ethnicity,” the website wrote.

They are talking about leaving the EAEU, do they at least imagine what it will mean?

I would like to emphasize once again our principled approach. Armenia needs a long-term peace that does not depend on empty words or the will of the enemy. We need to close the door to war once and for all. Armenia needs a guaranteed peace, based on the strength of the state, a functioning security system and clear mutual obligations. Peace, where Armenia is not vulnerable, where our borders are protected, and where people are confident about the future. Gagik Tsarukyan, the chairman of the “Prosperous Armenia” party, said this in an interview with 168.am before the upcoming congress of the party.


“Weakness does not bring peace, it creates new threats. Only a united, strong state can ensure long-lasting peace. And we will build such a peace, based on real international guarantees,” said Tsarukyan.


Turning to the question of whether Armenia’s external vector will be determined by these elections, the PAP leader emphasized that these elections are internal Armenian elections, they will first determine Armenia’s internal life. Then he turned to the international partners of RA.


“In the case of the success of the force led by me, Armenia will be open for cooperation. We are ready for dialogue. We are ready for honest partnership. In terms of the region, we stand with a clear position of continuing dialogue with our neighbors and resolving all difficult issues peacefully.


There is one principle, however, which is not subject to discussion. The fate of Armenia is decided by the people of Armenia. Elections are not a tool of geopolitics. We don’t need outside mediators in our society.”


Gagik Tsarukyan also stated that they reject the dangerous policy of dividing the Armenian society into camps.


“Pro-Russians, pro-Westerners – such divisions only break the backbone of our society. We need a united, strong backbone, especially now. We must unite all the divided and divided groups within our society, build bridges between people. One of the important tasks of our team will be just that,” he said. Then specifically refer to our relations with Russia, noting that we have passed through a difficult stage and made relevant conclusions.


“Armenia needs strong, honest and effective strategic relations with Russia. We will rebuild our alliance, it will include real commitments and mutual responsibility. We will create a security system where Armenia is not a weak link, but a valuable and necessary partner. It is in the interests of both Armenia and Russia.


Now they are talking about leaving the EAEU. I want to understand, do they at least imagine what it means? Ordinary people imagine and worry a lot. People still haven’t forgotten the beginning of the 90s, when the economy collapsed and we started building everything from scratch.


People have been working for years, they are doing business, they finally started to get income, now all of that can just come to dust. Most of our products are exported to the EAEU market. If you are going out, where will it be sold, where will it be exported? Isn’t he saying nice words? The European Union is our good partner and it will become even better, but we have not been invited to join, nor are we expected to join. Isn’t this a game that puts the well-being of our people and the future of our country at risk?” he stressed.


Gagik Tsarukyan also touched on the internal life and answered the question of how he imagines the change and how it differs from today’s internal politics.


“It differs primarily in terms of goals. Today, when you look at what is happening in our country, in our society, you have the impression that they specifically want people to be enemies of each other, to divide into closed, hostile groups, to hate each other. We can all have different opinions on a thousand issues, different approaches. And that is very good, because we must share these opinions, we must listen to each other to choose the right path.


Isn’t the one who has a different opinion an enemy? But they make an enemy. Our goal should be to change that. We have to change the atmosphere so that people strive to help each other, take care of each other, overcome the difficulties of our country together, so that our country is strong from the inside.”

Agreement on efficient data sharing and high data accuracy

In 2023, Armenia signed and ratified the agreement on the implementation of the unified reporting standard, which provides for the international exchange of financial accounts. This is the most important tool for tax transparency. It enables the exchange of financial account information between different countries. This year, Armenia has already exchanged information within the framework of the agreement with more than 40 countries.


This information was reported by Deputy Chairman of RA State Revenue Committee Rafael Gevorgyan at the session of the Standing Committee on Economic Affairs. In the first reading, he submitted for discussion the draft law on ratifying the addition of the multilateral agreement of competent authorities “On the automatic exchange of information on financial accounts”.


The changes mainly refer to self-declaration, identification rules, identification of account holders of organizations and persons related to clarification of certain provisions of the agreement.


The issue received a positive conclusion from the commission.

Let’s hope that the diplomatic efforts planned for the next two weeks are successful

April 8, 2026

Artak Zakaryan writes: “The American publication Axios, referring to its sources, reported that the supreme leader of Iran ordered on Monday to agree to the efforts of mediators to reach a ceasefire with the United States (initiated by Pakistan).

It seems that Washington was not satisfied with the initial conditions for the ceasefire approval by Iran, and the mediators of Pakistan, Egypt and Turkey worked to change it.

Iran’s foreign minister played an important role in the ceasefire negotiations with the US, persuading the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to accept the ceasefire proposal.

Trump spoke with Netanyahu before announcing a 14-day ceasefire with Iran in exchange for Israel’s support and agreement.

Netanyahu received guarantees from the US that in the upcoming negotiations, Washington will insist that Iran abandon its nuclear program and stop uranium enrichment and missile threats.

Trump also stated that he is not opposed in principle to accepting Iran’s proposals as a working option for negotiations.

According to the agreement, during the 14-day ceasefire, Iran must open the Strait of Hormuz to shipping, subject to some technical restrictions.

Let’s hope that the diplomatic efforts planned for the next two weeks will be effective and bring real and lasting peace to the Middle East.”

About 6 years after the war, how many people were found guilty of desertion, service?

April 8, 2026

yesterday we wrote that the RA Investigative Committee does not have “up-to-date” data on desertion during the 44-day war.

Has anything changed in the RA General Prosecutor’s Office data in the last year? On April 1 168.amhas also sent a written request to the RA General Prosecutor’s Office to get the answer to these questions.

1. During the 44-day war of 2020, between September 27 and November 9, how many cases of desertion were there, i.e., how many cases were initiated against how many people?

2. How many of the deserters in the 44-day war were from the regular army, how many from the reservists, volunteers?

Read also

  • The RA Investigative Committee does not have “up-to-date” data on desertion during the 44-day war
  • Why Ashot Pashinyan was not called to the training sessions? Papikyan keeps his specialty of military accounting a secret
  • The political motives of Hayk Sargsyan’s revelations. Why does he not demand the publication of the 44-day report, what was his brother doing during the war?

3. Were there cases of desertion from the National Security Service and the Police during the 44-day war and how many cases?

In response to these questions, the General Prosecutor’s Office states in its reply.

“In response to your 2026 of the first point of April 1, we inform you that December 25, 2025 inclusive, according to Article 361, Part 7 of the Criminal Code (adopted on April 18, 2003) (voluntarily leaving the military unit or place of service), with part 3 of Article 362 (defection) and part 3 of Article 364 (refusing to perform military service duties) articles was initiated 1786 criminal proceedings 10.687 to the person. 486 criminal case 655 was sent to the court with an indictment on the person. A guilty verdict was reached 410 about the person.

Regarding the 2nd and 3rd points of the survey, we inform you that separate accounting is not carried out.”

And in June 2025, the RA General Prosecutor’s Office provided us with this data.

“In the service area of ​​the RA Military Prosecutor’s Office during the period of the 44-day war of 2020 and the declared martial law (from September 27, 2020 to March 24, 2021) in accordance with Article 361, Part 7 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia adopted on April 18, 2003 (voluntarily leaving the military unit or place of service), According to part 3 of Article 362 (defection) and part 3 of Article 364 (refusal to perform military service duties), as well as with criminal proceedings initiated by a combination of the mentioned articles As of May 1, 2025 an investigation is being carried out in the pre-trial proceedings 8240 regarding persons. 

Committed crimes provided for in the mentioned articles 352 guilty verdicts have been passed on the persons”.

Let us add that at the same time, the RA Investigative Committee informed us that during the 44-day military operations of 2020, in cases of crimes against military service in the divisions of the Main Military Investigative Department of the RA Investigative Committee 1,500 criminal proceedings were initiated against 11,000 or more servicemen. The picture was the same in 2025.

And even if there is a certain change in the data of the prosecutor’s office in the last year, in any case, almost 6 years after the 2020 war, there is no evidence of the desertion of 11,000 or more people confirmed by the court.

Moreover, the relevant authorities are reluctant to make clear claims about how many cases of desertion there have been among regular army soldiers.

RFE/RL – Pashinian Threatens To Dispossess Wealthy Rival

April 08, 2026

Armenia -Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian meets with businessman Samvel Karapetian, June 24, 2021.

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian threatened to turn Samvel Karapetian into a “tramp” on Wednesday in an intensifying war of words with the indicted billionaire emerging as his main election challenger.

Karapetian’s political team cried foul on Tuesday as the ruling Civil Contract party hastily pushed through the Armenian parliament legal amendments banning the tycoon from giving his name to his opposition alliance that will run in the June 7 parliamentary elections. The alliance was unveiled and named Strong Armenia With Samvel Karapetian just a week ago.

Critics said the amendments highlighted Pashinian’s fears that Civil Contract will be collectively defeated by Karapetian’s bloc and other major opposition groups. Karapetian’s nephew and right-hand man Narek aired later on Tuesday a short video message mockingly urging Pashinian not to be afraid of the tycoon.

“He won’t do anything bad to you,” said Narek Karapetian. “When he comes out [of house arrest,] he has a couple of things to tell you.”

“How can I not be afraid?” Pashinian responded tartly the next morning. “I’m afraid that by the end of the year you’ll go from being a billionaire to a tramp.”

“This is what happens when a tramp by soul becomes prime minister,” shot back Narek Karapetian.

Armenia – Narek Karapetian presents the economic platform of his uncle Samvel’s opposition movement, Yerevan, January 20, 2026.

The bulk of Samvel Karapetian’s assets, estimated by the Forbes magazine at over $4 billion, are in Russia where the 60-year-old has mostly lived and made his fortune since the early 1990s. His biggest asset in Armenia is the country’s national electric utility. It was effectively seized by the Armenian government last July shortly after Karapetian was arrested following his criticism of Pashinian’s controversial attempts to depose Catholicos Garegin II, the supreme head of the Armenian Apostolic Church.

The tycoon challenged the seizure of the Electric Networks of Armenia (ENA) operator in an international arbitration body, seeking $500 million in damages. Despite the legal action, Pashinian’s government is expected to formally nationalize ENA soon.

Karapetian was initially charged with calling for a violent regime change. Investigators also filed tax evasion, fraud and money laundering charges against him following his subsequent decision to challenge Pashinian’s party in the 2026 elections. The tycoon, who was moved to house arrest in late December, rejects all the accusations as politically motivated.

Pashinian pledged to “finally shut down your money laundering system” late on Tuesday when he responded to Karapetian’s scathing statement about his April 1 visit to Moscow marked by Russian President Vladimir Putin’s stern warnings to the Armenian premier.

Putin specifically warned Armenian authorities against barring what he called pro-Russian opposition groups or politicians from running in Armenia’s upcoming parliamentary elections. He clearly singled out Karapetian. The latter claimed that Pashinian “disgraced himself in Moscow” and set the stage for a devastating “economic war” with Russia.

168: As a result of the same propaganda, Saakashvili was tied to … Iran

April 8, 2026

Satik Seyranyan’s guest in “Pressing” program is Turkologist, doctor of historical sciences, professor Ruben Melkonyan is

The main points of the interview are below.

  • In the 21st century, we live in an era of post-truth or metamodernism, and wars and victories also fit into this context. Even before this war, the negotiations were proceeding normally, they did not reach a deadlock, but the war started. With this war, Iran broke stereotypes, and when the whole world said that Iran would collapse in a few days, Iran proved that Iranian civilization gave birth to a political system, and today’s Iran is a state like a stump, whose roots go back centuries. Iranian society also became united, rallies and disagreements were left behind, religious leaders were ready for martyrdom. The state, under sanctions for decades, did not collapse.
  • Iran’s red lines went into effect and it began striking American strategic targets in the region. There was no blitz-war, no internal collapse of Iran, no Iranian capitulation: 
  • In all wars in the 21st century, the sides say we won. Even after the 44-day war, where we unfortunately lost, after some time Nikol Pashinyan announced that we won and gained independence and a state. In this case, America declares that it won, Iran says that it is the winner. I can say that Iran suffered unspeakable great losses, but entered the negotiation field with a better position, the Iranian state had gains. Iran has proven that it can go up against the world’s number one superpower, plus Israel, proving that its dignity is non-negotiable. Iran struck and American bases and Israeli cities, shattering their image of being unhittable. In fact, it was also recorded that the control of the Strait of Hormuz is given to Iran, and today the world is fighting for the control of the corridors.
  • How can one gleefully announce the destruction of a centuries-old civilization, or kill an 86-year-old spiritual leader with a minor granddaughter, and announce it with hilarious dance moves, as Trump did? The time will come when eccentric leaders will be replaced by non-eccentric leaders. It was only after the intervention of the no-eccentric Vance that the current truce became possible. It is in the interests of world peace that the era of rule by eccentric leaders end.
  • This truce is definitely fragile because America’s and Israel’s motives are not entirely satisfied, if not in many cases, failed. The Iranian lesson was an instructive lesson for our region. This is the style of Eastern politics, not what the Armenian authorities are showing, recognizing the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan 78 times, in numbers and centimeters.
  • Iran also says that this ceasefire does not mean that America is already a friend, and Iran will never forget what the US and Israel did. If the Iranian image is winning, the myth of Israeli invincibility has been shaken, and Israel now has a negative image curve.
  • Vance stood up for American interests, not against anyone. During these war days, Vance was inactive, sometimes unavailable to the press, meaning that Vance did not agree with what was happening in Iran.:
  • For the comfortable American society, it is unclear why their soldiers should die in the Middle East. This dissatisfaction is also manifested in the state apparatus. We are now seeing culpability in the US as well as loud resignations.
  • Not listening to narrow experts, American politics has entered into this adventure and now has to take a step back to save face.
  • If Iran has lost, as Trump says, then how does Iran present preconditions for negotiations?

Read also

  • “I can’t say now whether Pashinyan or Kocharyan is better for us.” Zulfugarov considers Pashinyan a “Russian candidate”.
  • Iran has significantly strengthened its geopolitical positions. I don’t think military operations with such intensity will resume after 2 weeks. David Jamalyan
  • Iran. unexpected turn. Washington announced that the US, Iran and Israel agreed on a ceasefire, and Iran on its victory.
  • A dignified death… when they are martyred for the sake of the motherland, for the sake of values… It is also known from our history that our kings and generals also suffered when death did not reach the horse’s saddle… “Known death” is characteristic of our region, the eastern civilization. This is how the Iranian leaders were martyred. For them, it was a matter of dignity not to hide in bunkers, hiding places. Ali Larijani, in addition to the positions he held, was a doctor of philosophy. That is, you kill a person with whom it was possible to negotiate. You accept the proven terrorist president of Syria, but you consider Dr. Larijani a terrorist and decide to definitely kill him:
  • The loss of Iran’s spiritual leader is very great, but the state pyramid does not collapse with his death, the same in the case of Larijani and other generals. In other words, the state builds its security on several foundations. In Iran, as it was in medieval France, when they said, “The king is dead, long live the king,” referring to the new king and the replacements of other key figures, the same mentality prevails. 

When the Iranian Foreign Minister was asked if he is not afraid that they will kill you, he said: let them kill me, not me, there are 5 candidates for Foreign Minister, one will be. And Nikol Pashinyan says, “If it’s not me, Armenia will not have a prime minister, there will be a war.” with this, Nikol Pashinyan says: this is not a state, it is a party. The contrast is obvious:

  • I don’t know whether Trump has changed his WhatsApp number or not because of this war. They linked state security to Trump’s phone number. You can’t associate the security of your state with a person. And if Trump is impeached tomorrow, what will happen?
  • One cannot deceive the Iranian state and say: you know, this is not “Zangezur Corridor”, it is TRIPP. What, some people think, will Iran allow some American military organization to come and establish influence on 42 km in its south?
  • In the case of TRIPP, the image of Trump as the bringer of peace was greatly exaggerated. With this war he crushed that mentality. What kind of peacemaker is it, if Trump can kill hundreds of girls and not feel bad about it, be happy…
  • The “call center” problem is part of my specialty. The book we authored is available, they could read it. And if after reading it they say “Zangezur Corridor” is not a problem and is a guarantee of peace, then they do not realize the depth of the issue. A scientist is not obliged to listen to politicians, but politicians are obliged to listen to scientists, will it be Trump or any of the government or opposition politicians of Armenia? Therefore, I would recommend that if they don’t know the subject in depth, at least they don’t talk about it. 
  • I followed the speech of the 3rd President Serzh Sargsyan at the RPA congress and I can’t help but notice that the emphasis on TRIPP, “Zangezur Corridor” in the speech was filled with both political experience and the correct combination of objective facts. Something was being said that no scientist can say is wrong. However, the political field of Armenia is rich with politicians who can use their experience and knowledge to serve the interests of the state, but unfortunately, today they are not the ones who decide the issues of the state. Objectively, there are few like them. There are Armenians in the RPA, people with Armenian political experience. No need to mix wet with dry. I looked with deep respect at the speeches given at the congress on how to give such accurate assessments of the issues related to the state:

  • If we look at the evaluation of some opposition forces regarding TRIPP, if you don’t read their name below, you will know that it is CP.
  • Going to peace does not mean forgetting your history at all. This government mixes two different things: peace and historical memory. We are a friendly country with Iran, that means we should not talk about the battle of Avarayr, should we remove the statue of Vardan Mamikonian? This is what Nikol Pashinyan is doing today, saying: forget Artsakh so that there is no war:
  • Nikol Pashinyan says: let’s stop the genocide race. This appeal is not addressed to Turks or Azerbaijanis, but to our public. This is unfortunate. Let me say something grotesque, it can reach him, they say: if we say: Armenian Genocide, Artsakh, Sumgait, Baku massacres, then Azerbaijan can also say: 1918 genocide, so let’s not say it, so that they don’t say it either…
  • In big politics, gossip and false heroism have dire consequences. We have seen the interactions of our 3 victorious presidents with their Russian and American counterparts, but we have never seen anything like this, because if your country is going to be in a difficult situation because of your brazen speech for 5 minutes, then your behavior is not right. Naturally, I cannot be happy about the hints and actions already taken by the Russian president or the state elite, but the slaps of big states are usually painful for the people of those countries. I’m not talking about being scared, but if you’re such a brave figure, once behave like this show in the meetings with Ilham Aliyev, during which he behaves poorly.
  • Our public’s displeasure with CSTO is related to not reacting in any way during the Azerbaijani attacks on Syunik and Jermuk. Nikol Pashinyan was only required to tell Putin that.
  • If, as a result of Nikol Pashinyan’s baseless propaganda, RA citizens have to suffer with the increase in gas prices, for example, then let them remember that when the lights go out in Europe, the sales of antidepressants go up… Are our people ready for such sacrifices? Remember what happened during the Russo-Georgian war, when Saakashvili was chewing his tie because the Russians approached Tbilisi and the Western partners did not support in any way? And what I’m saying is not at all about giving up dignity.

  • CP is consistent and hateful against internal enemies alone. There is no such consistency in foreign policy. CP is honest in this regard and our society should take serious consequences. With his published program, he says: whoever elected me on June 7, know that you are voting to go against the Holy Father and the Church. The removal of the Catholicos is part of their pre-election program, and the people should know this clearly. By voting for Pashinyan, you are voting against our church, Armenian identity and the Church. This is what Turkey wants. The Armenian Apostolic Church is the institutional enemy of the Turkish state, and this has been proven:

To remind: Nikol Pashinyan, who encourages and propagandizes sectarian organizations, will continue the campaign of attacks against the Armenian Apostolic Church and His Holiness the Patriarch. A few days ago, CP presented its pre-election program, road map, by which it announced that it will continue its anti-church steps if elected on June 7.

Here are the steps of the “Civil Agreement” party’s anti-church program.

a) Removal of the de facto head of the Armenian Apostolic Holy Church (retirement title),

b) Election of the Catholicos deputy in accordance with the established procedure,

c) Adoption of the Charter of the Holy Armenian Apostolic Church The charter should establish structures for maintaining the established principles, ensuring financial transparency and the good behavior of the clergy.

d) Election of the Catholicos of All Armenians in accordance with the established procedure. 

Details in the video.