Armenian, Belgian Foreign Ministers meet in Yerevan

 11:42,

YEREVAN, AUGUST 22, ARMENPRESS. Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan has met with Belgium’s Foreign Minister Hadja Lahbib at the Foreign Ministry headquarters in Yerevan, the foreign ministry spokesperson Ani Badalyan said Tuesday.

She said that the one-on-one meeting will be followed by an enlarged meeting.

Photos by Gevorg Perkuperkyan

“Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of Belgium Hadja Lahbib arrived at the Foreign Ministry of Armenia, where she was greeted by Foreign Minister of Armenia Ararat Mirzoyan. The tête-à-tête meeting of the Foreign Ministers of Armenia and Belgium commenced, which will be followed by the enlarged meeting,” Badalyan said.

Armenpress: Czech Foreign Minister calls for safety and freedom of movement in Lachin Corridor

 21:20,

YEREVAN, AUGUST 23, ARMENPRESS. Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Czech Republic Jan Lipavský has expressed concern for the humanitarian situation caused by the blockade of the Lachin Corridor.

“Good call with my Armenian colleague Ararat Mirzoyan. I expressed concern for the humanitarian situation caused by the blockade of the Lachin Corridor. Safety and freedom of movement there must be guaranteed. Dialogue between the parties involved is needed,” Lipavský posted on X.

Belgium Urges Baku to ‘Publicly’ Recognize Armenia’s Territorial Integrity, End Artsakh Blockade

Belgium's Foreign Minister Hadja Lahbib speaks in Yerevan in Aug. 22


Hadja Lahbib, the Belgian Foreign Minister visiting Yerevan on Tuesday, called on Azerbaijan to publicly recognize Armenia’s territorial integrity and voiced her country’s official position that the eight-month-long blockade of Artsakh must end.

“Our stance is the same both in Yerevan and Baku,” Lahbib told reporters during a press conference Yerevan with his Armenian counterpart Ararat Mirzoyan, when asked about what her message will be when she visits Baku.

“Belgium is deeply concerned about the tension caused by the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. The only way out of this conflict is the negotiations process and mutual concessions. During my upcoming visit to Azerbaijan, I will tell my Azerbaijani colleague that the agreements reached as part of the meetings in 2023 under the mediation of the President of the European Council Charles Michel have recorded positive progress,” said Lahbib.

“The leaders of the two countries have reciprocally recorded each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. I welcome the Armenian Prime Minister’s courageous statements pertaining to the path of peace. I also reiterate that the security and rights of the population must be guaranteed,” she added.

“We have welcomed the Armenian Prime Minister’s statement on publicly recognizing Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity and we call on the Azerbaijani authorities to do the same,” she said.

“What matters most for us is to overcome this deadlock, in order for the humanitarian situation to improve and the living conditions for the Armenian population in Nagorno-Karabakh to improve. This is part of the ceasefire agreement, and we call on Armenia and Azerbaijan to return to negotiations, be it in Washington or anywhere else,” said Lahbib.

“There are plenty of high-level negotiations. What’s lacking however, is the implementation [of agreements] on the ground,” the Belgian foreign minister said.

She added that during her meeting with Mirzoyan, the two emphasized the need for the presence of experts and commissions, who “will be able to end the animosity, will give the chance for real reconciliation and trust between the two peoples so that the two peoples living on both sides of the border get the opportunity to live in peace.”

The latest Armenia-Azerbaijan talks held in Brussels showed that a peace treaty is close and therefore the leaders of both countries must do everything in order for the Armenian and Azerbaijani people to live in peaceful conditions, Lahbib said, adding that her visit is aimed at supporting and encouraging more talks.

“Belgium is deeply concerned about the humanitarian situation in Nagorno-Karabakh, and its deterioration. The restriction of movement along Lachin Corridor is having serious consequences, causing serious dangers of famine and disease. During our meeting, representatives of the ICRC also stated that the life of residents in Nagorno-Karabakh is in danger, which is naturally unacceptable. Belgium fully shares the EU’s stance that ensuring the security of the population of Karabakh and free movement in Lachin Corridor is Azerbaijan’s obligation. Belgium will continue to be guided by this approach in is diplomatic contacts,” Lahbib said.

The Belgian foreign minister reiterated that position during a meeting with Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan later on Tuesday.

Earlier that day, she also visited Dzidzernagapert Armenian Genocide Memorial Complex.

Yerevan to Host Iran-Armenia Business Forum to Bolster Economic Ties

TASNIM News Agency
Iran – Aug 22 2023

According to the ministry, packages of investment and export opportunities of Iran’s free and special economic zones with a focus on the cooperation of the two countries as well as packages of investment and tourism capacities will be presented at the forum.

Import and export companies, tour organizers, producers of home appliances, cosmetics, textiles, automotive parts, LED lamps, greenhouse and agricultural equipment and insurance companies will attend the forum.

Back in April, the Kapan Cultural Center in Syunik province in southern Armenia hosted an exhibition that showcased features of Iran's free economic zones (FEZs).

High-ranking Iranian and Armenian officials and traders attended the exhibition.

In April 2012, a memorandum of understanding (MoU) was inked between Iran’s Aras Free Economic Zone and Armenia’s Meghri Free Trade Zone. 

Nagorno-Karabakh blockade: ‘In a couple of weeks there will be a mass famine’

The Observers
Aug 22 2023

The only road connecting Armenia to the enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh – a breakaway region disputed for decades between Armenia and Azerbaijan – has been completely blocked by Azerbaijan since July. A resident describes the challenges the population faces in obtaining food and water, adding that some people have died from the effects of the blockade.

Text by:Sorana Horsia

Since December 2022, the only route connecting Nagorno-Karabakh to Armenia – the Lachin corridor – has been gradually blockaded by Azerbaijan.

The region of Nagorno-Karabakh, predominantly inhabited by ethnic Armenians, has been at the centre of a conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan since the fall of the Soviet Union, leading to two wars from 1991 to 1994 and then at the end of 2020. In the latest war, Azerbaijan managed to gain control over the majority of the region. According to a ceasefire established with the assistance of Russia, free movement through the Lachin corridor would be guaranteed.

© The Observers

In December 2022, Azerbaijani environmental protesters blocked the Lachin corridor, demonstrating against the alleged exploitation of natural resources in the region by Armenia. Yerevan accused them of being backed by Azerbaijan. The tensions at the border culminated with a clash between Azerbaijani and Armenian troops in March and April. Azerbaijan set up a checkpoint on the Lachin corridor on April 23, claiming that its purpose is "to prevent the illegal transportation of manpower, weapons, mines” from Armenia to Nagorno-Karabakh. Initially, Red Cross humanitarian vehicles were let through.

After months of restricted movement through this corridor, Azerbaijan announced on July 11 the suspension of all traffic. The flow of humanitarian aid from Armenia was subsequently completely halted on July 26. Since then, trucks carrying 400 tons of food and essential goods have been waiting at the checkpoint set up by Azerbaijan.

As a result of this blockade, the humanitarian situation in Nagorno-Karabakh is critical. Stores are empty, people wait for hours in over 35 degrees Celsius to buy bread, and water resources are running low. Electricity and gas are also limited, as the supply usually comes through Azerbaijan.

Mary Asatryan works as an assistant to the Human Rights Defender (Ombudsman) of Nagorno-Karabakh in Stepanakert. For months, she has been documenting her daily life on Instagram, where she posts photos and videos of the queues in front of bakeries, the 20-kilometre journey she makes to fetch water bottles, and the locals helping each other.

The entire day consists of struggling with all the deprivations and the consequences of the blockade. So every day we have to check the schedule of the electricity blackouts, which are published either in the morning of that day or in the late evening of the previous day. Then we have to adapt to that schedule because the blackouts don't happen at the same time at my home, at my workplace, or at the shops. So you have to know where electricity is going to be working and manage your time accordingly.

Also, at the moment, you cannot buy anything at the stores anymore. The shops are completely empty. What we have left is a limited amount of bread, which is baked and sold at the bakeries. Why? Because there is no fuel left in the country to deliver the bread to the stores. So people have to walk by foot to the bakeries directly and queue there.

The bread queues can reach five or six hours, and most of the time people queue at night because during the day it's so hot that people can't stand. But there are, of course, people who queue during the day, but as I work at the office, I cannot afford that.

But I, for example, I'm getting exhausted physically standing in the queue sometimes. So some days I just even give up on bread. Last time I was standing in the queue, there were 500 people registered. So it's really endless.

There are some rare farmers coming from the nearby villages and selling their locally produced seasonal vegetables and fruits. So basically they sell what they have harvested in their yard. But to do this, imagine that some people have to walk tens of kilometres to sell something. So if you are lucky enough to catch a farmer on the street or, you know, find someone who sells locally produced fruit, then you have a meal for the day. But most of the time, it's the bread that people rely on. 

So a couple of weeks more and there is going to be a mass famine.

On August 15, the office of the Human Rights Ombudsman of Nagorno-Karabakh stated that a 40-year-old man had died due to hunger. However, Asatryan says that he is not the only case, and if the blockade does not stop, there will certainly be more deaths due to famine and lack of medication.

There was a very tragic story of two kids who died one month ago. So what happened is that their mother left their home in the village [of Aghabekalanj] and she walked tens of kilometres to reach the nearby city, Martakert, to find something to eat. The kids were sleeping at that time. Then they woke up. They didn't find their mother. They decided to walk to find her. They walked for a while and then they got tired because they were, of course, hungry and exhausted. So they found a car, they entered and they fell asleep. But it was so hot that they basically, unfortunately, died because of the heat and exhaustion. They died because of the whole situation. And this was one of the most shocking stories of the whole blockade.

Photos of the two children who died in Nagorno-Karabakh at the beginning of July.

The numbers of miscarriages among pregnant women are rising. Women are under a lot of stress. They have to walk all the time. It's very hot. They don't get nutritious, vitamin- rich food. So they lose their unborn children. 

There was a story, for example, of a woman from the village Haterk who started to bleed and there was no car to take her to the hospital. So she was brought to hospital too late and she had already lost her child. I think the most challenging consequences are in the healthcare system, because we have a lot of patients who are not receiving enough medication, they're not undergoing their planned surgeries now. And in the long term, of course, there will be more deaths.

On August 16, the United Nations Security Council held an emergency meeting at the request of Armenia to discuss the situation in Nagorno-Karabakh. Many countries called on Azerbaijan to reopen the Lachin corridor.


Signs of possible easing of Karabakh blockade

EurasiaNet
Aug 22 2023
Aug 22, 2023

Azerbaijan has reportedly allowed several dozen residents of Armenian-populated Nagorno-Karabakh to go to Armenia after having tightly blockaded the region for over two months.

The development has led to speculation about possible agreements between Karabakhi and Azerbaijani officials. 

On August 21, Azerbaijani public television reported the movement of "up to 60 Armenian residents of Nagorno-Karabakh with Russian passports" to Armenia via the Azerbaijani customs checkpoint at the Lachin road – which is the only road connecting the region to Armenia and the outside world. 

"These people supported separatism in Azerbaijan," Public TV's reporter said from the checkpoint. "Yet, the Azerbaijani side provides them an opportunity to go to any destination of their choice without barriers, totally safely." 

The Lachin road has been blocked since December 2022, when Azerbaijani government-linked self-identified eco-activists staged a sit-in on the Lachin road, accusing the de facto Nagorno-Karabakh government of committing "ecocide" in the region. The demonstrations ended in April after Azerbaijan set up a customs checkpoint on the other end of the Lachin road, near the Armenian border. While most Karabakhis refused to use the checkpoint, as they saw it as an acknowledgment of Azerbaijani sovereignty over the region, there was some movement

Later, on June 15, Azerbaijan shut down all kinds of movement on the road, greatly exacerbating shortages of foodstuffs and supplies in Nagorno-Karabakh. On August 15, the first report of a death from malnutrition emerged from the region. 

On August 17, the UN Security Council convened to discuss the situation at the Lachin road and Karabakh at the request of Armenia. While France, the UK, and the U.S. all urged Azerbaijan to abide by a February ruling from the International Court of Justice ordering the country to provide free movement at the Lachin road, the council failed to issue any statement or resolution. 

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev has continuously denied that Nagorno-Karabakh was under blockade, as did the country's ambassador to the UN Yashar Aliyev. At the Security Council meeting, Yashar Aliyev cited the recent Azerbaijani proposal to provide humanitarian aid to Karabakh via the Azerbaijani city of Aghdam – which was backed by the EU Council President and Russia but rejected by Karabakhis, as they saw it as a legitimization of Azerbaijani rule over the region. 

"If Armenia were genuinely concerned about the ordinary residents of the region, it would never have objected to the usage of the Aghdam-Khankendi road for the delivery of goods to the Karabakh region," Azerbaijan's UN envoy said, citing the significantly shorter distance between Nagorno-Karabakh's de facto capital (Stepanakert in Armenian and Khankendi in Azerbaijani) and Aghdam vs the distance between it and the Armenian border. 

In this context, the news of a partial lifting of the blockade came as a surprise.

Azerbaijani pro-government media emphasized that those who left Karabakh were Russian citizens. 

In an editorial titled "The 'Russian world' plan didn't succeed in Azerbaijan," news agency Report.az presented the August 21 movement of Armenians as an end to a Russian conspiracy. "The game Russia played in Georgia and Ukraine did not happen in Karabakh. It is known that the Kremlin distributed Russian passports to its loyal tribes in those territories and later created so-called republics in the territory of these countries," the piece read. 

"This can be called a component of the hybrid war waged by Russia against Azerbaijan," it continued, repeating Baku's demand that the Karabakh Armenians "accept Azerbaijani citizenship and our laws."

(Russia deployed a peacekeeping contingent to the region after it brokered a ceasefire between Armenia and Azerbaijan to end the Second Karabakh War in 2020. The contingent is scheduled to leave the region in 2025, and its presence can be extended only with the consent of both sides. For a while after the Armenian side's defeat in the second war there was talk of Karabakh Armenians becoming Russian citizens and the region becoming some sort of Russian protectorate.)

Movement at the checkpoint continued on August 22. 

On August 21, the Armenian opposition media outlet Pastinfo.am reported that the Karabakh authorities agreed with Azerbaijani government to use the Aghdam road for aid delivery, and that representatives of the two sides would meet in the coming days in the Azerbaijani city of Barda, near Karabakh. 

Azerbaijani media interpreted this report as indicating an agreement was in the works for a lifting of the blockade of the Lachin road.

On August 22, David Babayan, advisor to the de facto Karabakh president, spoke to Pastinfo.am. 

He did not directly confirm or deny reports of a possible meeting of Karabakhi and Azerbaijani representatives in Barda, saying only that Karabakh was willing to discuss humanitarian issues but not "so-called integration or the dismantling of Artsakh's [Nagorno-Karabakh's] statehood" with Baku. 

He also said that any opening of the road connecting Aghdam to Karabakh would have to be linked to the opening of the Lachin road connecting Karabakh with Armenia. 



Opinion: Claims of Genocide Push Nagorno-Karabakh Further From Peace

JURIST
Aug 22 2023

Edited by: JURIST Staff

Earlier this month, a former prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC), Luis Moreno Ocampo, released a legal opinion claiming that genocide is under way against ethnic Armenians in the Azerbaijani region of Nagorno-Karabakh. Such serious allegations should not be made lightly and require careful scrutiny. In light of this opinion, the Government of Azerbaijan appointed me to review the allegations and produce an independent expert legal assessment. It was released yesterday.

For the Ocampo opinion’s potentially wide-reaching consequences, no evidence is identified to support the central claim that a genocide is presently unfolding in Nagorno-Karabakh. Yet its provocative assertions threaten to undermine a peace process between Azerbaijan and Armenia over their nearly three-decade dispute concerning Karabakh. A peace settlement is closer than ever before under EU and US mediation: the Armenian government has broken with precedent and stated it is ready to recognise that Nagorno-Karabakh is part of Azerbaijan – as has been the position of the international community in accordance with international law. Armenia invaded the territory in the 1990s and expelled the hundreds of thousands of Azerbaijanis that lived there. It has since financially and militarily supported the breakaway territory.

The Ocampo opinion was written on behalf of those who have everything to lose in a peace deal: the self-proclaimed government of the illegal entity. Its release coincides with rising prospects for a settlement and the region’s imminent reintegration into Azerbaijan. Unfortunately, it risks stirring tensions on the ground. Moreover, its allegations could limit Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s freedom to pursue a peace deal if taken at face value. After close examination of the opinion’s assertions, they have been found to be strikingly unsubstantiated.

It claims Azerbaijan has imposed a blockade on Nagorno-Karabakh which is causing mass starvation, and thus conditions of life calculated to bring about the physical destruction of the inhabitants. In 2020 a short conflict broke out which saw Azerbaijan reclaim some of its internationally recognised territory. That included a region through which a road – the Lachin corridor – passes, linking Armenia to the territory of the separatist entity. Azerbaijan has established a checkpoint on this road near the border, which is said was necessary “to stop the illegal flow of weapons, military equipment, and soldiers into [its] sovereign territory”. The road remained open to humanitarian aid supplied by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). The ICRC confirmed in a statement that its emblem has been misused for smuggling. It has also most recently confirmed that it has provided extensive medical, food and other supplies since December 2022 (when Ocampo claims the blockade commenced), and continues to evacuate persons in need of medical care and provide safe passage to reunite separated families.

The opinion does not grapple with these factual matters. Significantly, it fails to mention that Azerbaijan suggested an alternative route (the ‘Aghdam-Khankandi route’) through which the ICRC and government could supply the ethnic Armenian inhabitants of Nagorno-Karabakh. This option has been acknowledged by the EU. But these offers have been rejected by the de facto authorities in Karabakh. These are plainly relevant circumstances to take into account particularly when claiming that Azerbaijan is deliberately inflicting conditions of life designed to physically destroy those living there.

Information that clearly undermines the opinion’s conclusions is simply left out. The very serious allegation of genocide, from an individual of standing in international law, carries certain responsibilities, in particular meeting the exacting burden of proof and weighing all available evidence. It is therefore unjustifiable that these pertinent considerations have seemingly been passed over. It falls far short of the rigorous hallmarks of a fair minded and balanced expert opinion. Moreover, genocide has a high threshold in international law – the specific intent to physically destroy the group in whole or in part. The stringent requirement of this intent can only be inferred with very considerable caution and when it is unequivocally established, as has been stressed by various international courts. The opinion ignores the well-established international law position. Given that the opinion claims genocide is already underway, it is also curious that there is no mention of the material impact on the local population.

Last week, a UN Security Council meeting was held at the request of the Armenia on the situation in Nagorno-Karabakh. Whilst many speakers noted the issue of humanitarian aid had been politicised, no speaker – bar the Armenian ambassador – mentioned the phrase genocide or ethnic cleansing. However, Edem Wosornu, the Director of Operations and Advocacy at the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs said humanitarian relief should be allowed to resume through any available routes. No statement was issued by the Council at the end of the session. The unsupported claims of the opinion have not provided any basis for international action.

It is essential that the unverified conclusions of the Ocampo opinion should not be allowed to obstruct the peace process between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Instead, its publication should galvanise the international community in doubling down on mediation efforts to bring a durable peace.

 

Rodney Dixon KC is a leading counsel and expert in international law. He has both prosecuted and defended before all international criminal courts, going back to the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda (ICTY / ICTR). He has particular expertise in cases involving alleged genocide and crimes against humanity, having acted in cases before the ICTY, ICTR and the International Criminal Court (ICC), for example, in the Sudan Situation concerning the alleged genocide case against President Bashir; in Syria for the mass crimes committed against the civilian population; and, for the East Turkestan Government in Exile regarding the alleged genocide of the Uyghurs. Rodney also represents the widow of Jamal Khashoggi. He is co-author with the current chief prosecutor of the ICC Karim Khan KC of the leading textbook on international criminal courts, Archbold International: Practice, Procedure and Evidence. He practices from Temple Garden Chambers, London, and The Hague.

 

Opinions expressed in JURIST Commentary are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of JURIST's editors, staff, donors or the University of Pittsburgh.

Under siege: Nagorno-Karabakh accuses Azerbaijan of throttling supply lines

POLITICO
Aug 22 2023

KORNIDZOR, Armenia — Maria Musayelyan gave birth to twin girls on Sunday — now she’s worried about being able to keep them alive.

With Azerbaijan accused of blocking all supplies to the ethnic Armenian enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh, fears are growing over the fate of the 100,000 people living there.

“There were days during my pregnancy when I know I didn’t get enough food. And now it’s not just about food,” the 25-year-old lawyer said in a telephone interview from the region’s capital, Stepanakert. “There’s no toilet paper, no toothpaste, no baby formula, no clothes for the children.”

Nagorno-Karabakh’s Armenians fought a war against Azerbaijan in the early 1990s; hundreds of thousands of Azerbaijanis were killed or forced to flee their homes as the Armenians took control and declared the independence of their unrecognized breakaway state — inside Azerbaijan’s internationally-recognized borders but cut off from the rest of the country by trenches and fortifications.

Azerbaijan turned the tables in 2020 with a lightning offensive that reconquered key parts of the enclave. The war was halted by a Russian-brokered ceasefire, but in recent months Azerbaijan has tightened the noose on the Lachin Corridor, a mountainous road that is the only link between Nagorno-Karabakh and Armenia.

In Kornidzor, an Armenian village on the border with Azerbaijan, a line of white aid trucks — laden with hundreds of tons of flour, cooking oil and other supplies from the Armenian government — has been stuck at an army checkpoint for the last month. Azerbaijan is refusing to let it pass. Nearby, half a dozen boys chase a football up and down a dusty field, every now and then letting out a cheer as it bounces off the burned-out armored vehicle rusting behind the goal.

Aid organizations, including the International Committee of the Red Cross, are also warning that they are unable to get food and fuel into the breakaway region and that a humanitarian crisis looms.

“The situation is close to catastrophe,” said Sergey Ghazaryan, the foreign minister of Nagorno-Karabakh’s unrecognized government. “There’s no sphere of life that isn’t suffering.”

Azerbaijan insists there is a solution — it’s just not one that’s palatable for Karabakh Armenians hoping to preserve some semblance of independence.

Hikmet Hajiyev, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev’s foreign policy adviser, insisted to POLITICO that “the Lachin road is open” — while refusing to explain why the Red Cross and other international organizations are unable to use it.

He said his government wants aid to be delivered, just not via the Lachin Corridor from Armenia but from the Azerbaijani city of Aghdam, because it “historically links Karabakh to mainland Azerbaijan” and is “less costly and more convenient.” Russia tentatively backs the idea, while the EU and the U.S. say it’s not an alternative to Lachin.

Baku’s motive for the shift is clear. While the Lachin Corridor offers Nagorno-Karabakh a contiguous lifeline to Armenia, deliveries through Aghdam — which lies to the east of the enclave — would require long, looping transit through Azerbaijan.

Karen Minasyan/AFP via Getty Images

“Why are the Armenians refusing to use the Aghdam road?” Hajiyev asked. “Because they don’t seek reintegration — they simply seek separatism and they seek irredentism and would like to preserve their illegal puppet regime on the territory of Azerbaijan.”

Ghazaryan warned that Azerbaijan’s offer to bring in aid via Aghdam is an effort to force the Karabakh Armenians to give up their independence and accept being part of Azerbaijan. ““If we accept the opening of the Aghdam road and supply from the Azerbaijani side, we legitimize the crime they are committing,” he said.

“In case of the reopening of the Lachin Corridor we will reestablish our self-sufficiency and there will be no need to receive cargo from Aghdam,” he added.

For now, the Armenians are hanging on, but the humanitarian cost is rising.

In July, one Karabakh Armenian doctor said miscarriages had tripled as a result of malnutrition and a lack of medical care, while local media reported a woman lost her baby after she was unable to get to hospital due to a shortage of fuel for the ambulance.

Agricultural work has all but ground to a halt without fuel to power farm machinery or get food from the countryside to the Karabakh Armenian capital, local officials said. They also claim Azerbaijani forces have fired on farmers in their fields, making it almost impossible to sow crops and harvest hay for their animals.

Nagorno-Karabakh’s leadership is calling on the EU, U.S. and others to impose sanctions on Azerbaijan and to push for a return to the status quo ante to prevent a catastrophe.

At a meeting of the U.N. Security Council last week, nations including the U.S., U.K., France and Russia acknowledged the ongoing blockade and called for aid to be allowed in.

But the debate underlined how far apart the two sides are.

Yashar Aliyev, the country’s permanent representative to the U.N., responded to Armenian allegations by holding up printouts of Instagram posts purportedly showing Karabakh Armenians eating food and living life as normal. “People are happy,” he said. “They are dancing at their wedding party. This is a celebration. Very tasty cookies!”

Pressure is growing on Azerbaijan to relent.

Luis Moreno Ocampo, the former chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, published a report earlier this month calling the situation “an ongoing genocide.”

Russia’s failure to guarantee safe passage in and out of the region, which it vowed to do under the terms of the 2020 ceasefire, means the Karabakh Armenians are looking West for security assurances.

“We’ve been seeing two major trends since the start of the war in Ukraine,” said Tigran Grigoryan, head of the Regional Center for Democracy and Security think tank in the Armenian capital of Yerevan. “Russia’s interest in the region is decreasing and its priorities are shifting. Militarily, diplomatically, politically, they don’t have the leverage they used to have.”

Azerbaijan is seeking to reassure the international community that warnings of an ongoing ethnic cleansing campaign are overblown. It has hired London lawyer Rodney Dixon to write a rejection of the Moreno Ocampo report.

“If you’re going to make an allegation as serious as genocide, you have to look at all the factors,” Dixon said. “There might be many other issues between the parties, but there’s no evidence that’s been identified a genocide is underway.”

He said Azerbaijan’s offer to redirect aid via Aghdam shows it is not intent on driving out Nagorno-Karabakh’s Armenian population.

But there are doubts as to the Azerbaijani government’s long-term intentions.

“No plan, white paper or document setting out a positive vision for the future of Karabakh Armenians has ever been made public by the Azerbaijani authorities,” said Laurence Broers, an expert on the conflict and associate fellow at Chatham House.

According to him, assurances that locals will receive equal treatment under the constitution of Azerbaijan fail to acknowledge that they “are not just any population but one that has been in protracted conflict with the Azerbaijani state for decades.”

“The Aghdam offer would be more credible if it was linked to deescalation — rhetorically and militarily — and to a vision for an ongoing transformation of the troubled relationship between Azerbaijani state and Karabakh Armenian population,” Broers said.

Meanwhile, in Stepanakert, Musayelyan and her neighbors struggle to survive.

“We are eating whatever can be grown here, mostly vegetables — there’s some potatoes, some pears, some plums,” she said.

https://www.politico.eu/article/azerbaijan-armenia-nagorno-karabakh-lanchin-corridor-humanitarian-aid/

Armenia, selective abortion remains a concern Areas Armeniaita eng

Aug 22 2023
  • Areas
  •  

  •  Armenia

ita eng

22/08/2023 -  Armine Avetisyan Yerevan

Selective abortion has been an issue in Armenia in recent years. As a result of efforts by the government and the private sector, it seemed that many families had given up on the idea of having only a male child, but after the war of 2020 the issue has become relevant again. There are still families in Armenia who choose selective abortion.

“My brother died in 2020. It was a war. I missed my brother, I was looking for his replacement everywhere…”, Gayane (the name is changed), 38, who is pregnant and expecting a boy, begins her story.

The woman, who has a 6-year-old daughter, lives in the Kotayk region, which is near the capital city of Yerevan. She always dreamed of a boy, but it became an obsession when her brother died, an obsession shared by her husband.

“I planned that, no matter what, I would have a boy who would bear my brother's name, who would help me and my parents overcome the grief of losing my brother. I got pregnant 2 years ago. It was planned. It turned out to be a girl. I took pills, had an abortion. It was a difficult phase. I don't want to talk about it now. I committed a sin, but I needed a boy…”, Gayane says.

The woman developed health problems after the intervention. Fortunately, the treatment was successful, the couple planned another pregnancy, and this time the echo showed a “boy”.

“I live for my unborn son. He helps me, gives me strength. You know, I'm not the only one, there are many women who dream and aspire to have a boy”, she says.

According to the Statistical Committee of the Republic of Armenia, the highest index of gender disparity in Armenia was recorded in 2000, when the number of boys born per month far exceeded the number of girls. In ten years, however, the balance changed in favour of girls.

In 2021, the best balance was reached – 108 boys against 100 girls – but it went back to 112 against 100 in 2022. This is despite the fact that the standard ratio of newborns in the world is considered to be 104-106 boys/ 100 girls.

What caused the increase in the gender disparity index in 2022, experts find it difficult to say. However, there is a thesis that war is to blame.

“At this stage, it is still difficult to talk about the main reasons, but war has left its mark”, sociologist Sona Hovakimyan notes. According to Hovakimyan, selective abortion has always been a problem in Armenia, which is aggravated from time to time.

“Sex selection increases when a family is expecting a second child”, says Zaruhi Tonoyan, Coordinator of the UN Population Fund's Combating Gender Discrimination Program.

In 2022, the research “Prevalence and Causes of Gender-Biased Sex Selection in the Republic of Armenia” was carried out with the support of the European Union and the United Nations Population Fund. The study  showed that the preference for boys in Armenia has increased:

“We should highlight that girls matter. Women should be valued in society, we need to talk a lot about this, so that we can prevent selective abortion. We are taking a step back. We had a positive index, which we need to achieve again”, Tonoyan notes.

The research showed that selective abortion is especially widespread in regions, particularly in rural areas. If respondents in Yerevan are neutral about gender preference, preferences are stronger in regions, especially for a male child. A similar study was conducted in Armenia in 2017 as well. It is clear that the problem has worsened again, especially in the regions.

“Prevalence and Causes of Gender-Biased Sex Selection in the Republic of Armenia” research

Looking at results by regions, we can see that boys are most preferred in the Gegharkunik region. 33% of the respondents stated that they prefer boys.

“The first child should be a boy”, says Lilit, 19, from the Gegharkunik region, who has just gotten married but is already planning a child. “We always say in our family that we should have a boy, we will name him after my father-in-law, that is not up for discussion”, Lilit says. When asked what she will do if the first child is a girl, she remains silent, then shortly answers: “As God wills”.

Lilit is still a student. She says that one of her colleagues got married earlier than her and is already a mother. “She gave birth to a girl. Poor woman. They tried to force her to have an abortion. The husband’s family wanted a boy, but her parents stood by her and the girl was born. However, her husband didn’t go to the hospital. She lived at her parents' for about three months. Then, thank God, her husband came to his senses, now they live together, they are a happy family. Well, when I think deeply, I realise that the important thing is to have a healthy child. May I be healthy, I will have many children, both girls and boys”.