The Guardian ‘Facebook isn’t interested in countries like ours’: Azerbaijan troll network returns months after ban State-backed harassment campaign targets journalists and dissidents in authoritarian country By Julia Carrie Wong in San Francisco and Luke Harding in London Tue 13 Apr 2021 04.00 EDT Facebook has allowed a state-backed harassment campaign targeting independent news outlets and opposition politicians in Azerbaijan to return to its platform, less than six months after it banned the troll network. A Guardian investigation has revealed how Facebook allowed an arm of Azerbaijan’s ruling party, the YAP, to carry out the harassment campaign for 14 months after an employee, Sophie Zhang, first alerted managers and executives to its existence in August 2019. In October 2020, Facebook announced that it was removing more than 8,000 Facebook and Instagram accounts and Pages linked to the YAP for violating its policy against “coordinated inauthentic behavior” (CIB) – the kind of deceptive influence operation used by Russia to interfere in the 2016 US election. But a Guardian review of the operation’s most common targets found that the trolling operation has clearly returned. An analysis of one post on the Facebook page for the independent social media outlet Azad Soz (“Free Speech”) found that 294 of the top 301 comments (97.7%) came from Facebook Pages that had been set up to resemble user accounts – the same mechanism used by the CIB operation that Facebook banned. The result appears to allow an authoritarian regime to drown out debate on one of the only venues for free expression available in Azerbaijan, a former Soviet republic that ranks 168th out of 180 countries on Reporters without Borders’ World Press Freedom Index. “Facebook isn’t interested in countries like Azerbaijan,” said Arzu Geybullayeva, an Azerbaijani journalist who lives in Turkey due to threats over her reporting. “Your report shows how indifferent the platform is to countries not in the spotlight and less known. We have made several failed attempts before at getting Facebook to have someone from the Azerbaijani region to explain the context. They really can’t be bothered.” Zhang uncovered the troll operation in the course of her work as a data scientist for a team at Facebook dedicated to combatting fake engagement: likes, shares and comments from inauthentic accounts. She found thousands of Facebook Pages – profiles for businesses, organizations and public figures – that had been set up to look like user accounts and were being used to inundate the Pages of Azerbaijani’s few independent news outlets and opposition politicians on a strict schedule: the comments were almost exclusively made on weekdays between 9am and 6pm, with an hour break at lunch. A list of the operation’s top 20 targets, generated by Zhang in August 2020, resembles a list of the most prominent critics of Azerbaijan’s autocratic leader, Ilham Aliyev, who has ruled with an increasingly authoritarian grip since 2003. It includes news outlets whose editors have been forced into exile, such as Azadliq newspaper, Azad Soz and Mikroskop Media; news outlets whose sites are blocked in Azerbaijan, such as Radio Free Europe and Abzas.net; and the political opposition, such as the Azerbaijan Popular Front party (APFP) and its chair, Ali Karimli. The party has been subject to what Human Rights Watch has called a “relentless crackdown”. Karimli told the Guardian that the attacks on Facebook from the YAP’s “vast army of trolls” were part of a coordinated campaign by the government which included hacking his social media accounts and blocking him from accessing the internet. “We have a very repressive regime. There are no independent newspapers or TV. The only way to express your opinion freely is via social media,” he said. “So Facebook, Instagram and other platforms play a big role here. Facebook is popular because we don’t have free information space.” Karimli said state officials had copied the idea of a troll factory from Russia. He estimated the regime employed about 10,000 full-time trolls. They were physically located in the capital Baku and spread out inside the youth branch of the YAP, as well as in the interior ministry and state-funded NGOs. The trolls were easy to spot, he added, in a country which has around three million Facebook users. “They have no photos, no personal life. They open accounts just to troll me,” he said. The YAP did not respond to queries from the Guardian. The use of trolls to produce comments that praise the ruling party and criticize the opposition is “one of the social tools of authoritarianism”, said a researcher who studies technology and dissent in the region. The Guardian agreed not to name the researcher because they have been the target of coordinated online harassment and abuse over their work. “In order to maintain their rule, [autocrats] need to give the impression that the people do actually support them,” the researcher said. “In this social media age, comments and likes and followers and all these other quantifications are a really good way to let their rivals know that the people are with them.” The flood of comments on the pages of dissidents also stymies online debate and has a “chilling effect” on others who may consider speaking out, the researcher added. “It shows everyone else that if you do this, you’re going to be attacked.” At Facebook, Zhang rang the alarm bells, informing and repeatedly following up with various managers and executives as well as Facebook’s threat intelligence team, which is tasked with investigating potential CIB campaigns. But it took until December 2019 for Facebook to assign an investigator to look into what was happening, and until February 2020 for that investigator to establish that the network was clearly connected to officials in the YAP. Despite this evidence that an authoritarian regime was violating Facebook’s rules in order to suppress dissent – a situation which should have qualified the campaign for a CIB takedown – Facebook abandoned work on the investigation in March 2020, and only resumed it in August in response to complaints by Zhang inside the company. A Facebook spokesperson, Liz Bourgeois, said: “We fundamentally disagree with Ms Zhang’s characterization of our priorities and efforts to root out abuse on our platform. “We investigated and publicly shared our findings about the takedown of this network in Azerbaijan last year. These investigations take time to understand the full scope of the deceptive activity so we don’t enforce piecemeal and have confidence in our public attribution … Like with other CIB takedowns, we continue to monitor and block their attempts to rebuild presence on our platform.” On Monday, the company said it had disabled more than 300 Pages identified by the Guardian for violating its policies against inauthentic behavior. It did not dispute Zhang’s factual assertions about the Azerbaijan case. By the time Facebook announced its takedown of more than 8,000 Facebook and Instagram accounts and Pages in October, Azerbaijan was fighting a war with Armenia over the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh, which only increased the online abuse, according to Fatima Karimova, who runs Mikroskop Media with her husband, Javid. “We faced insults and threats, not just from trolls but also by ordinary people,” she said. The couple – both journalists – set up Mikroskop Media three years ago after fleeing Azerbaijan. They are currently based in Latvia. “Everybody knows these comments are from trolls. I don’t know precisely how long it’s been going on but it’s certainly been visible for at least two years. We see it mainly on Facebook and Instagram, not on Twitter. Sometimes we post an infographic or video and there are 700 hostile comments.” The trolls take up their targets’ time and energy, and they frequently make false reports that can result in journalists or bloggers having their social media accounts frozen, said Mehman Huseynov, an Azerbaijani blogger who was imprisoned for two years over his work exposing corruption. “We can’t fight this,” Huseynov said by WhatsApp message, just two days after he had been again detained by police who he said attempted to hack into his phone. “[The] only thing we can do is just to block … But it takes a lot of time.” One of the difficulties for Huseynov and other opposition bloggers and activists is that Facebook has not translated all of its tools and instructions into Azeri, making the process of reporting abuse or regaining access to frozen accounts especially onerous. Huseynov relies on assistance from international NGOs but said that it was difficult for less-established bloggers who don’t have connections with such groups. Facebook’s slow response may have been in part hampered by this institutional blind spot. The company’s vast workforce includes subject matter experts who specialize in understanding the political context in nations around the world, as well as policy staff who liaise with government officials. But Azerbaijan fell into a gap: neither the eastern European nor the Middle Eastern policy teams claimed responsibility for it, and no operations staff – either full-time or contract – spoke Azeri. Still, the existence of Azerbaijan’s state-backed troll farms was documented in English-language scholarship dating back to 2014 and a 2018 report by the US-based Institute for the Future. Indeed, the researcher said that they had repeatedly raised the issue with Facebook staff at conferences since 2012. “The relevant people at Facebook have known about this for years and years,” they said. “They should have known better and they should have paid more attention.” The degree of repression in Azerbaijan makes Facebook’s failure to rein in the regime’s rule-breaking all the more damaging, since Facebook is one of the only means for expression accessible to Azerbaijani internet users. “It’s the one thing where government [has] no control,” said Huseynov. “Facebook cuts both ways in Azerbaijan,” said Geybullayeva. “In one way, for the political opposition in Azerbaijan, Facebook is the place to organize and to get support for a specific issue. The dark side is, because this is happening in the open, it’s also a way for the government to see what is being discussed and who is saying what. This is how people become targets. It’s double-edged.” Geybullayeva said she had spotted Mark Zuckerberg in Budapest in 2013 or 2014 while she was attending a meeting on an internet freedom report. At the time she was enthusiastic about the social network. She said she tried to go up to him, to thank him for what Facebook was doing to make freedom of speech possible in her home country. “A bodyguard pushed me away,” she said. “I’m always reminded of that encounter. It shows how uninterested Facebook is [in us].” Asked what he would say to Zuckerberg, Karimli said: “First, I would thank him. Facebook facilitates public discussion. But repressive regimes with vast financial resources also use it to spread fake news. Facebook should speed up the time it takes to delete troll-generated content. They need to enact tough measures. And they should hire someone who speaks Azeri.”
Author: Eduard Nalbandian
“Azerbaijan consolidates its position as a global center of intolerance and xenophobia” – Armenia MFA
13:46,
YEREVAN, APRIL 13, ARMENPRESS. Armenia’s foreign ministry has issued a statement on the opening of the “park” dedicated to Artsakh war in Azerbaijan, the ministry told Armenpress.
“On April 12, with the participation of the President of Azerbaijan a “park” dedicated to Artsakh war was opened in Baku, where along with the Armenian military equipment the mannequins of the servicemen of the Armenian armed forces, personal belongings of the soldiers of Armenia and Artsakh and the helmets of killed Armenian servicemen were displayed. The opening ceremony of the “park” and the remarks of the President of Azerbaijan demonstrate that the above-mentioned action is aimed at publicly degrading the memory of the victims of the war, missing persons and prisoners of war, violating the rights and dignity of their families.
At a time when the consequences of the war unleashed by Azerbaijan against Artsakh haven’t been fully addressed, when numerous Armenian prisoners of war are being held in Azerbaijani captivity, with the organization of such an “exhibition” wrapped in the elements of marauding, Azerbaijan is finally consolidating its position as a global center of intolerance and xenophobia. Such anti-human behavior of the Azerbaijani high-ranking leadership is more vocal than any statement or PR-campaign on peace, tolerance and multiculturalism.
On one hand, the Azerbaijani leadership is making observations about possible revanchisme on the part of Armenia, and on the other hand, with such exhibition, attempts to perpetuate the revanchisme, inhumanity and interethnic hatred. Such steps manifest how far the Azerbaijani leadership stands from its own declarative statements on the post-conflict situation, regional peace and reconciliation”, the statement says.
CivilNet: Artsakh’s Former Primate on, Faith, Hope, Mistakes, Peace & Worries
Biden poised to recognise Armenian genocide as Turkey left without friends
Turkey has spent millions of dollars on sometimes bizarre campaigns to dissuade the American government from calling the murder and expulsion of the vast majority of the Armenians in Anatolia during World War One a genocide.
For decades, the United States government has tiptoed around the issue, afraid of the fallout it could precipitate in U.S.-Turkish relations.
Ultimately, all this money and effort appears to have been a waste. At the end of 2019, the United States Congress and Senate passed a resolution to officially “(1) commemorate the Armenian Genocide, the killing of 1.5 million Armenians by the Ottoman Empire from 1915 to 1923; (2) reject efforts to associate the U.S. government with efforts to deny the existence of the Armenian Genocide or any genocide; and (3) encourage education and public understanding about the Armenian Genocide.”
Now, statements coming from White House officials and President Joe Biden’s own history of supporting genocide recognition makes it likely that on April 24, Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day, he too will officially use the term “genocide” to describe the fate of the Ottoman Armenian community.
Biden’s decision to break the trend of equivocation by his predecessors makes sense given his long history supporting resolutions like the one passed by Congress a year and a half ago. As a senator, Biden supported similar resolutions as far back as 1984. He was a co-sponsor of the 1990 resolution that spurred contentious debate between those opposed, led by Senator Robert Byrd, and those in favour, led by Senator Bob Dole.
Despite, or perhaps because of, his continued support for these ultimately failing resolutions, Biden has not wavered in his conviction that the U.S. government should recognise the Armenian Genocide. In a post on Medium to mark last year’s Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day, then candidate Biden “pledge[d] to support a resolution recognising the Armenian Genocide and will make universal human rights a top priority for my administration”.
Experts agree that Biden is likely to make an official declaration referring to the mass death and deportation of Ottoman Armenians in Anatolia as a genocide. The consensus is that not only does he genuinely believe that the events constitute that term, but the current, perhaps historically, low point in U.S.-Turkish relations makes this decision more politically feasible.
“Previously when the Armenian Genocide bill would be up for discussion on the Hill there would be a flurry of various groups, from foreign policy analysts who defended Turkey for real-politik reasons to pro-Israel groups who saw Turkey as an ally to defence contractors who didn’t want to lose crucial arms sales,” said Daphe McCurdy, Senior Associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
“That doesn’t really exist anymore or to the extent it does, these pro-Turkey groups don’t have a sympathetic ear among any U.S. policymakers whether on the Hill or in the administration,” McCurdy said.
Nicholas Danforth, a non-resident fellow at the Hellenic Foundation for European and Foreign Policy, concurs:
“Turkey has no friends left in Washington, and it is increasingly hard to make a geopolitical case that Turkey is an important enough ally, that not angering Turkey is important enough, to block the resolution,” Danforth said.
A low point in bilateral relations may seem like the worst time to risk a statement on the genocide. Thus, it is perhaps surprising that the experts not only agree that if Biden does follow through with a genocide recognition statement, U.S.-Turkish relations will not be irrevocably damaged but some also feel that finally moving past the issue of recognition might actually improve relations in the long term.
“It’s something the Turks will get angry about, they will probably recall their newly arrived ambassador, maybe they will ask the U.S. ambassador to leave for a time, but at the end of the day, there are too many real, pressing issues that these two countries have to deal with that are very imminent, they are not about history, they are not symbolic, they are real issues,” said Alan Makovsky, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress.
“If anything, because it’s the United States, there is going to be a lot of reasons to get past it,” he said.
“When it comes to the members of the Turkish-American diaspora who take their political cues from Ankara, the Biden administration’s recognition of the Armenian genocide could end up being a liberating development,” said Aykan Erdemir, Senior Director of the Turkey Program at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and a former member of the Turkish parliament.
“Until now, the bulk of the Turkish-American mobilisation in the United States has revolved around pushing back against various efforts to recognise the Armenian genocide,” Erdemir said.
“Once the issue is behind, the Turkish-American diaspora will have an opportunity to channelise its energies to more productive endeavours that will accrue positive dividends for themselves as well as for their countries of residence and origin.”
Some experts stress that Turkey sees the United States in different terms than EU countries, and that there is more symbolic weight to it taking this action, but that this was still not enough reason to believe that a permanent diplomatic breakdown was imminent. That of course does not mean that President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan will not take full advantage of any official statement by Biden in the service of domestic politics.
“Erdoğan is searching for any distraction from his political and economic weaknesses and will undoubtedly use this issue to do the same,” McCurdy said. “But at the end of the day, these antics will only get him so far if they don’t put food on people’s tables.
“That’s not to say that much of the Turkish public won’t be outraged by the decision, just that Erdoğan has been using anti-Americanism as a tool to garner political support for years and there are diminishing marginal returns to its effectiveness, especially as people’s economic plight increases.”
There will undoubtedly be segments of the Turkish population who are angry and offended by it if the president makes an official declaration using the term “genocide”, but Taner Akçam, a professor of history at Clark University, and one of the preeminent historians on the Armenian Genocide, cautioned that all news about how “average Turks” feel should be taken with a huge grain of salt.
“[The Turkish government] will put their position in the mouths of so-called ‘ordinary Turks’,” Akçam said. “Whatever we will see and we will hear about Turkish public reaction, will not be Turkish public reaction. If they allowed the free press in Turkey, public reaction would be totally different.”
For example, Akçam doubts that much of the ethnic Kurdish population in Turkey buy into Turkish government propaganda about what did or did not happen to the Armenians in Anatolia, given their own experience with violent cultural suppression, and subsequent government denial that it is happening.
Akçam also sees a wider cultural and political shift happening in Turkey, which is ultimately indicative of the weak international position the Turkish government now finds itself in.
“There is a basic change in Turkish society in understanding the Armenian Genocide. In the early days, before (prominent Armenian journalist) Hrant Dink’s assassination, in the 80s, 90s, we were the bad guy,” Akçam said. “We were dragged from courtroom to courtroom. We were attacked. There was a hate campaign against us. We were in a defensive position. Today, we won the psychological war in Turkey. Today, psychologically, the Turkish government is in a defensive position.”
This does not mean that the Turkish government is just going to give in to international pressure and overwhelming historical evidence and stop denying that the killing and deportations that wiped Armenians from Anatolia constitute a genocide.
Akçam likens genocide denial in Turkey to racism in the United States. “Denialism is a political structure,” one that can only be defeated by democratisation and significant changes to Turkish society, he said.
The fact that the U.S. government has now politicised the historical facts has set back progress toward any such shift.
“The tragedy of all of this is by not recognising the Armenian Genocide earlier, by waiting until U.S.-Turkish relations had deteriorated to this point, Washington has made it very easy for Erdoğan to turn around and say “look, they’re just saying this because they are angry at us now”, and this won’t prompt any kind of moral reckoning, this won’t prompt any kind of real, serious conversation in Turkey,” Danforth said.
“The refusal to take this step earlier when it would have been inconvenient, has irrevocably politicised it. I still think it is the right thing to do, but we should avoid feeling too good about it,” he said.
Armenians rally in front of Azerbaijani Embassy in Berlin, demand release of POWs
April 8 2021
Armenians and German human rights advocates held a silent protest in front of the Azerbaijani Embassy in Berlin on Tuesday to demand the release of Armenian prisoners of war and other detainees, Vernatun Deutschland German Armenian grassroots movement informs
The government of Azerbaijan is requested to release the Armenian prisoners of war and kidnapped civilians who are being held in violation of the Geneva Conventions and the trilateral statement signed on November 9 between Armenia, Russia and Azerbaijan.
The protests will take place weekly until all Armenian prisoners of war have been released.
The consequences of war, including those of war crimes such as the use of mercenaries, the kidnapping of civilians, the beheading and murder of prisoners of war, the use of outlawed ammunition, the murder of civilians, the use of phosphorus bombs to burn forests, and the bombing of civil structures are still evident today.
“Compliance with the ceasefire agreement on the release of prisoners of war is an essential step in securing peace in the region. Otherwise it is to be feared that the prisoners’ lives will be misused as a bargaining chip and put at risk in order to occupy further territories, sometimes even within the recognized territories of Armenia, which could lead to further instability,” organizers say.
ICU beds near capacity across Armenia as health authorities brace for thousands of new cases
17:31, 29 March, 2021
YEREVAN, MARCH 29, ARMENPRESS. With 90% growth in infections, health authorities in Armenia are predicting more than 7000 new cases next week, the Deputy Director of the National Center for Disease Control and Prevention Gayane Sahakyan told reporters.
“Right now we have a difficult epidemiological situation in Armenia. Our hospital system is rather overloaded, beds are nearing capacity. A nearly 90% growth of infections is recorded,” she said, adding that the basic reproduction number of the virus is 1,2 – thus they expect 7000 new cases next week. She said there won’t be any available hospital beds when this happens.
Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan
RFE/RL Armenian Report – 03/31/2021
Wednesday, March 31, 2021
Pashinian Installs New Senior Security Official
March 31, 2021
• Sargis Harutyunyan
Armenia -- The main entrance to the National Security Service headquarters in
Yerevan.
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian has installed a 31-year-old judge as a deputy
director of Armenia’s National Security Service (NSS).
President Armen Sarkissian formalized Andranik Simonian’s appointment with a
decree signed on Wednesday.
Simonian has been a judge of the court of first instance of the country’s
northern Lori province since June 2020. He previously worked as a prosecutor in
Yerevan.
Some Armenian media outlets said the presidential decree initiated by Pashinian
is a prelude to Simonian’s appointment as director of the NSS. The prime
minister’s office did not comment on the media speculation.
Pashinian has replaced five heads of Armenia’s most powerful security service
since coming to power less than three years ago. Two of them, Argishti Kyaramian
and Mikael Hambardzumian, were fired during last fall’s war with Azerbaijan.
Kyaramian, 29, was sacked after four months in office, while Hambardzumian
served as acting head of the NSS for only one month. The latter was replaced by
the current NSS director, Armen Abazian, in November.
Hambardzumian and another former NSS director, Artur Vanetsian, are now
outspoken critics of Pashinian. Vanetsian also leads a political party which is
affiliated with an opposition alliance trying to oust Pashinian over his
handling of the six-week war in Nagorno-Karabakh.
Areg Kochinian, a political analyst, said the frequent changes of the NSS chiefs
as well as their deputies reflect Pashinian’s “spontaneous and emotional”
leadership style and “the current authorities’ terrible staffing policy.” He
said they have a negative impact on the NSS’s activities.
“That reflects [negatively] on the predictability of this agency for both its
personnel and our partner countries,” Kochinian told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service.
“It also definitely affects the effectiveness of the NSS.”
Ruling Team Names Election Campaign Managers
March 31, 2021
• Artak Khulian
Armenia -- Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian and his political allies hold a rally
in Yerevan, March 1, 2021.
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian and his political team have named four senior
government officials to run their parliamentary election campaign.
Deputy parliament speaker Alen Simonian, another leading Pashinian ally, said on
Wednesday that Minister for Territorial Administration and Infrastructures Suren
Papikian will be the ruling team’s chief campaign manager.
Papikian oversees Armenia’s provincial governors and elected heads of local
communities.
Simonian said that Environment Minister Romanos Petrosian, the chief of
Pashinian’s staff, Arsen Torosian, and a senior aide to the prime minister,
Arayik Harutiunian, will also play a major role in the campaign for snap
elections expected in June.
All four officials are senior members of Pashinian’s Civil Contract party, the
dominant component of the ruling My Step bloc that won 70 percent of the vote in
the last general elections held in December 2018.
Armenia -- Minister of Territorial Administration and Infrastructure Suren
Papikian speaks at a news conference in Yerevan, February 26, 2020.
Simonian told reporters that Pashinian and his party have not yet decided
whether to preserve My Step, form a new electoral alliance or participate in the
elections on their own.
Asked whether new figures could join the ruling team ahead of the polls, he
said: “I cannot name any names. But nor can I exclude that there will be new
people on our list.”
Pashinian announced on March 18 plans to dissolve the current Armenian
parliament and hold the elections on June 20 amid continuing opposition protests
against his rule. He has since toured two Armenian provinces to hold rallies in
about a dozen local villages.
Opposition leaders say Pashinian has effectively launched his election campaign
in breach of Armenian law and is abusing his government levers in a bid to hold
on to power.
“It is clear that Pashinian has used and will use all [government] resources at
his disposal to do well in the race,” said Gevorg Gorgisian of the opposition
Bright Armenia Party.
Simonian dismissed the opposition allegations of foul play. He insisted that
Pashinian’s rallies in Armavir and Aragatsotn provinces did not amount to
illegal campaigning.
“The Armenian authorities are now in the most disadvantaged position because
they have not only moral but also legal obligations,” he claimed. “They don’t
have the kind of financial resources that the opposition has now. The Armenian
opposition is now much wealthier and more competitive in terms of resources than
the current authorities.”
World Bank Expects Slow Economic Recovery In Armenia
March 31, 2021
Armenia -- Workers rebuild a road in Gegharkunik province, Juy 4, 2020.
Armenia’s economy will return to growth this year after contracting by 7.6
percent in 2020 mainly because of the coronavirus pandemic, according to the
World Bank.
“GDP growth is projected to recover partially in 2021 (to 3.4 percent) and more
strongly in 2022 (4.3 percent). The recovery will be slow; the economy is
unlikely to return to pre-COVID output levels until 2023,” the bank said in its
latest Economic Update for Europe and Central Asia released late on Tuesday.
“Private consumption and the services sector are expected to recover gradually.
Private investment will likely remain subdued, reflecting weak investor
confidence,” added the report.
The Armenian government has forecast a similar growth rate for 2021. However,
the country’s Central Bank said on March 17 that the domestic economy will
likely expand by only 1.4 percent.
Data from the government’s Statistical Committee shows that GDP continued to
shrink in January and February 2021.
The World Bank cautioned that its growth projections are a “baseline scenario”
which assumes that Armenia will avoid coronavirus-related lockdowns and further
political upheavals.
“The risks to the outlook are weighted heavily to the downside,” it said, adding
that they include a “slow pace of immunization” of the population and “elevated
political uncertainty.”
“Although the pace of vaccinations will gradually ramp up, the authorities do
not expect to vaccinate a significant share of the population until 2022,” read
the report.
The bank also noted the pandemic’s “severe” impact on low-income Armenians,
saying that poverty in the country increased considerably in 2020. “The
unemployment rate rose by 1 percentage point year on year, reaching 18.1 percent
at end-September 2020,” it said.
Armenian Minister Resigns After Assault
March 31, 2021
• Narine Ghalechian
Armenia -- Minister of High-Tech Industry Hakob Arshakian speaks at a press
conference in Yerevan, December 18, 2019.
Armenia’s Minister of High-Tech Industry Hakob Arshakian announced his
resignation on Wednesday almost two weeks after assaulting a journalist at a
restaurant in Yerevan.
“As a citizen of the Republic of Armenia, I find it unacceptable for an official
to use violence against any citizen,” he wrote on his Facebook page.
Arshakian referred to a violent incident at the restaurant where he dined with
his wife on March 18. Footage from a security camera publicized afterwards
showed him hitting Paylak Fahradian, the editor of the Irakanum.am news website,
in the face and damaging his laptop computer.
The assault reportedly occurred moments after Fahradian approached Arshakian and
asked him to explain why he is not at work.
The video sparked an uproar from Armenian journalists and media associations.
Some of them demanded the minister’s resignation.
Law-enforcement authorities pledged to investigate the assault. The Special
Investigative Service told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service on Wednesday it has yet to
decide whether to prosecute Arshakian.
In his first reaction to the incident, Arshakian implicitly accused Fahradian of
violating his privacy but said he is ready to bear responsibility for his
actions. He later apologized to the journalist.
Rumors about Arshakian’s resignation began circulating on Wednesday morning. A
spokeswoman for Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian pointedly declined to refute them.
Arshakian confirmed his resignation in the afternoon. “I am thereby expressing
my intolerance towards both physical and psychological violence,” he said. “I
hope that the incident will serve as a lesson for our society and that we will
love each other and respect everyone’s right to privacy a bit more.”
Arshakian is a senior member of Pashinian’s Civil Contract party. He has held
the ministerial post since October 2018.
The 35-year-old also found himself in hot water earlier this year after it
emerged that his ministry, which oversees the domestic defense industry, failed
to properly organize Armenia’s participation in an international arms exhibition
held in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The Armenian government had allocated 23
million drams ($44,000) for that purpose.
Armenian defense firms displayed no items at the Abu Dhabi exhibition for at
least three days. Arshakian blamed that on “logistical problems.”
The Ministry of High-Tech Industry said on Tuesday that three of its officials
have been formally reprimanded as a result of an internal inquiry conducted
after the scandal.
Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2021 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
China to donate 100,000,000 yuan to Armenia
14:37, 1 April, 2021
YEREVAN, APRIL 1, ARMENPRESS. The Armenian government approved the signing of a cooperation agreement with China whereby the latter will donate 100,000,000 yuan. The money will be used for building a new studio of the Armenian Public Television and the implementation of other jointly agreed projects.
Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan
Armenian, Russian FMs discuss Karabakh issue, bilateral relations
Azerbaijani press: Absence of minefield maps makes it difficult to find mines in Azerbaijan’s liberated lands – Trend TV reports
FUZULI, Azerbaijan, Mar.31
By Jeyhun Alakbarov – Trend:
The absence of maps of minefields makes it difficult to find mines in the lands of Azerbaijan liberated from Armenian occupation, Representative of the Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action (ANAMA), Madat Mammadov, told Trend’s Karabakh bureau.
He noted that Armenia has not yet given the minefield maps to Azerbaijan.
“Demining of the Azerbaijani liberated territories is the most pressing issue that is under the close scrutiny of the Azerbaijani government. The Armenian side did not provide us with maps of mined territories, which complicates the search for mines,” Mammadov said.