CoE Venice Commission Insists On Maintaining Status Of Immunity Of E

COE VENICE COMMISSION INSISTS ON MAINTAINING STATUS OF IMMUNITY OF EMPLOYEES OF ARMENIAN OMBUDSMAN’S ADMINISTRATION

ArmInfo
2008-10-23 18:35:00

ArmInfo. The Venice Commission of the Council of Europe insists on
maintaining of the status of immunity of employees of the Armenian
ombudsman’s administration.

According to the Venice Commission experts’ conclusion on the draft
amendments to the law on ombudsman sent to ArmInfo by the Office of
the Human Rights Defender (Ombudsman) of Armenia, the principle of
maintenance of immunity of the ombudsman’s administration is the main
guarantee of his work’s independence which allows the ombudsman to
carry out his exclusive mission in the democratic society. To recall,
the justice ministry of Armenia took into account the suggestion
of the GRECO international anti-corruption organization and came
out with draft amendments to the law on ombudsman which stipulated
deprivation of the ombudsman’s administration of immunity. At the
Oct 17-18 plenary session, the Venice Commission made a conclusion on
these amendments. According to the document, if the Armenian society
has inviolable establishments, the ombudsman’s administration must
be one of such establishments. As one of the ombudsman’s tasks is
to hold a special kind of investigation which often causes criticism
against authorities, the ombudsman’s institute is becoming a political
institute turning into a possible target of various attacks, the
Venice Commission’s statement says.

Senior NK Deleg Debates with EU Policy Makers at AGBU EU Round Table

AGBU Press Office
55 East 59th Street
New York, NY 10022-1112
Phone: 212.319.6383, x118
Fax: 212.319.6507
Email: [email protected]
Website:

PRESS RELEASE

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Senior Karabakh Delegation Debates with EU Policy Makers at AGBU
Europe Round Table

Brussels, 19 October 2008 – A delegation from Nagorno-Karabakh visited
Brussels from October 14 to 17 to take part in a round table hosted by
AGBU Europe in partnership with the Heinrich Böll Foundation’s
Brussels office. The delegation was composed of Eduard Atanesyan,
Deputy Foreign Affairs Minister of the Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh,
and David Babayan, Head of the Information Department of the Office of
the President of Karabakh.

The AGBU-hosted round table brought together representatives of
various organizations and institutions involved in European policy in
the region, including NGOs, think tanks, embassies and various
European institutions. Azeri diplomats and NGOs in Brussels, though
invited, did not attend.

Karabakh is one of the three territories in the Caucasus which
declared independence at the time of the collapse of the Soviet
Union. After successfully defending its independence in an unequal and
devastating war with Azerbaijan between 1992 and 1994, this small
republic of 145,000 inhabitants struggled to rebuild itself and worked
to establish a functioning state.

The purpose of this visit — the first to Brussels by a delegation
from Karabakh since 1999 – was to allow EU decision-makers and experts
to establish contact with representatives from Karabakh and to inform
them about the country’s situation. Even though the EU’s interest in
the South Caucasus has increased considerably in recent years, it has
abstained from establishing relations with Karabakh, even at the most
informal level. The EU’s special representative for the South Caucasus
has not yet traveled to Karabakh, though he has visited other
unrecognized republics in the region.

The round table reviewed the state of Karabakh’s economy, state and
society. Karabakh’s economy started from nothing after it was entirely
destroyed in the war but it is now developing fast. It faces
challenges similar to those of most other post-Soviet republics,
compounded by the absence of international assistance and by potential
investors’ reluctance caused by the country’s unrecognized status. On
the other hand, the speakers claimed that governance and democratic
standards, facilitated by the country’s small size, are rather more
advanced in Karabakh than in the neighboring South Caucasian
republics.

Over the last 14 years, negotiations have been pursued under the aegis
of the Minsk group of the OSCE to seek agreement on Karabakh’s final
status. In this context, both Babayan and Atanesyan explained their
government’s positions in the context of the negotiations by
describing their territory’s specific situation and its experience of
a terrible war. Karabakh aspires to being included as a party in the
negotiations on its future status, which it is still excluded from. In
a lively discussion regarding the Azeri refugees’ right to return to
Karabakh, Babayan confirmed that they were welcome to do so, provided
that those involved accept the jurisdiction of the Republic of
Nagorno-Karabakh. He insisted, however, that refugees should not be
used as pawns in a political game, and that negotiations on the topic
should genuinely aim to satisfy their right of return.

This round table, held on October 16, was the first in a series of
round tables and events which AGBU Europe will be organizing in the
context of its work with the European institutions. The next event to
be organized will be a conference, on November 13 next, on the
Rediscovery of Armenian Heritage in Turkey. For more information, see

Established in 1906, AGBU () is the world’s largest
non-profit Armenian organization. Headquartered in New York City, AGBU
preserves and promotes the Armenian identity and heritage through
educational, cultural and humanitarian programs, annually touching the
lives of some 400,000 Armenians on six continents.

www.agbu.org
www.agbueurope.org.
www.agbu.org

Presidential Election In Azerbaijan

PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN AZERBAIJAN
Alexander Iskandaryan

Eurasian Home Analytical Resource
October 20, 2008
Russia

The presidential election in Azerbaijan is of little interest in terms
of influence on the political situation in the country and in the
South Caucasus as a whole. The election returns are quite predictable,
incumbent President Ilham Aliyev has no serious rivals and his easy
victory was assured.

In this sense there were no surprises in the election. Aliyev took
over 89 % of the vote. His getting, for example, 53% would come as
a surprise to me. But the Azerbaijani regime does not allow this
election to change the political situation drastically. The election
is nothing but confirmation of Aliyev’s legitimacy as President,
which is necessary for both foreign and domestic political ‘markets’.

It is another matter that the so-called five-day war in Georgia and the
syndrome of ‘football’ diplomacy between Turkey and Armenia have really
changed Azerbaijan’s place in the region. We are the South Caucasus and
all the three countries are directly connected with each other. The old
South Caucasus ceased to exist and the new one has not appeared yet.

It is clear that Georgia is weaker than it used to be, whatever is
said. Europe does not look on Tbilisi as the lamp of democracy in
the Caucasus any longer. The same is most likely to hold true for
the USA after the presidential election.

Of course, in the future Georgia may regain its authority. What
is more, if Georgia controls Abkhazia and South Ossetia again,
the country will overcome the collapse. But it will take years and
Azerbaijan understands that.

The second factor is recognition by Russia of South Ossetia and
Abkhazia. They cannot be called full-fledged states. But now they
implement the processes in the Caucasus. Georgia will unlikely use
force in order to regain control over them. Therefore, Abkhazia
and South Ossetia will continue to seek statehood, which Azerbaijan
also understands.

This happens against a background of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict
because of which Armenian-Azerbaijani relations are so complicated. So,
it comes natural that Russia strengthens its role in the South
Caucasus. The Azerbaijani authorities are concerned about it. I
repeat that this situation is not everlasting – Russia strengthened
and weakened its role in the region at different times. Baku came
to realize that the Nogorno-Karabakh issue cannot be solved by
using force.

Apart from that, Turkey is trying to spread its influence in the South
Caucasus. Evidently, the country has come to agreement with Russia
about that. For the time being, there is no telling what will come
of it. Still another important factor is the Russo-American rivalry
over the Nagorny-Karabakh issue. All of those factors are active, they
are not counterbalanced, so the situation is developing dynamically.

If Azerbaijan Continues Threats, Armenia Should Recognize Karabakh,

IF AZERBAIJAN CONTINUES THREATS, ARMENIA SHOULD RECOGNIZE KARABAKH, SAYS MANOYAN

ARF Press Office
Monday, October 20, 2008

YEREVAN (ARF Press Office)–Armenian Revolutionary Federation
political director, Giro Manoyan, told a press conference Monday that
if Azerbaijan continues its threats of military aggression Armenia
will have no other choice but to recognize the independence of the
Nagorno-Karabakh Republic.

Manoyan also reiterated the ARF’s ongoing position that Karabakh cannot
be part of Azerbaijan, adding that the liberated territories should
not be returned. He said the compromise in such a scenario would be
"peace."

The ARF leader expanded his explanation by saying that unlike the
policies of the first president of Armenia, it has become very clear
in the last 10 years that Karabakh cannot be part of Azerbaijan. This
reality, he explained, is also a critical issue recognized by the
OSCE Minsk Group whose leaders, while discussing the territorial
integrity principle, also underscore the importance of the right to
self-determination of peoples.

"The OSCE Minsk Group co-chair countries are not announcing that
the Karabakh conflict will be resolved by returning Karabakh to
Azerbaijan. This approach indicates that they have understood the
impossibility of such an option," said Manoyan.

The ARF representative, once again, asserted that Turkey cannot take
part in the OSCE Minsk Group since it is a party to the20conflict
and has been an ardent defender of Azerbaijan.

Manoyan also added that he did not foresee a resolution to the conflict
by the end of the year, citing various factors, among them the upcoming
presidential elections in the US. He also added that last week’s
elections in Azerbaijan demonstrated that Ilham Aliyev is not dependent
on any political force in Azerbaijan on the Nagorno-Karabakh issue.

In this regard, Manoyan said that all political forces in Armenia must
play a role in the conflict resolution process by clearly articulating
their position on the matter and emphasized the need for Karabakh to
return to the negotiating table as a party to the conflict.

Gas Delivery To Armenia Suspended For 2-3 Days

GAS DELIVERY TO ARMENIA SUSPENDED FOR 2-3 DAYS

PanARMENIAN.Net/
20.10.2008 15:55 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The delivery of natural gas to Armenia was suspended
for 2-3 days, says a statement posted on ArmRosgazprom website.

The delivery was suspended on October 19 for repair-and-renewal
operations in Georgia. The consumers will be supplied with gas from
the Abovyan underground gas storage.

More Balls Going Into The Goalpost Of The Armenian Diplomacy

MORE BALLS GOING INTO THE GOALPOST OF THE ARMENIAN DIPLOMACY
Karine Mangasaryan

Yerkir
September 26, 2008

According to Dr. Armen Ayvazyan, Director of Ararat Center for
Strategic Research, the first stage of Armenia-Turkey dialogue
proceeded in unequal conditions, with the Turkish side taking the
upper hand. But we may see Turkey scoring many more goals into the
goalpost of the Armenian diplomacy, so that, in Ayvazyan’s words,
soon we may be talking of a hockey rather than a football game. In
an interview with Armen Ayvazyan, we present his answers to a range
of questions on the Armenian-Turkish issues.

– Almost a month has passed since the Turkish President’s visit and
the famous soccer match. However, over that period and to this moment
we have been up against a constant flood of information against the
Armenian interests by the Turkish-Azeri propaganda machine. Do you
think this is a result of our weak diplomacy, or is the aforementioned
united propaganda machine just too strong for us?

– Turkey and Azerbaijan have always had a united stand on these issues.

Since 1991 Turkey has been leading the efforts of in developing
and implementing anti-Armenia and anti-Armenian policies. We fail
to perceive this, and many people among us repeatedly reiterate the
misconception that Turkish policy on Armenia is dominated by, or even
held hostage to Azeri interests. Nothing of that sort! Both Turkey and
Azerbai jan have it on their agenda to destroy Armenia. Our political
authorities have consistently ignored this agenda ever since 1991;
they won’t acknowledge and give it due political assessment. And
without proper assessment of the full extent of this threat, our
policy towards Turkey becomes irrational, abnormal, resulting in
dire mistakes. A single fact: Armenia agrees to Turkey’s proposal
to to fascilitate an Armenia-Azerbaijan settlement. Following this,
the president of the country says that those who object to such
assistance are not normal. Let’s analyze this.

Thus, we have two allied nations that have a clear agenda of strangling
Armenia economically, diplomatically, militarily, and by means of
information warfare. In this situation, one of the stranglers says,
"Let me help the two of you to get along well." Armenia thanks in
return, saying "Carry on strangling me, I don’t notice it." And, she
agrees to a three-partite meeting, in which Turkey plays the role of
a facilitator. (They say "facilitator, not a mediator", but it’s hard
to tell the difference between the two.) This is a glaring example
of Armenia’s "normal" foreign policy, which cannot withstand to a
critique. By calling the expert opinions "abnormal", the Administration
is trying to take the debate out of the realm of logic, and using its
administrative authority corner serious debates, replacing them with
Western clichés like "football diplomacy", "thaw" and "rapprochement
in Armenian-Turkish relations" and so on. The fact is that there are
no Armenian-Turkish relations per se; we face the Armenian-Turkish
conflict. The Turkish policy is either not assessed and analysed at
all, or receives a profoundly inaccurate evaluation. Take this recent
example, for a comparison: this is how the Israeli President Simon
Peres, in his 24 September speech at UN, retaliated to the Iranian
president Ahmdinejad, who happened, once or twice, to question and
deny half-heartedly the Jewish Holocaust: "Their despicable denial of
the Holocaust is a mockery of indisputable evidence, a cynical offense
to survivors of the horror."[1] Peres continued with a list of sharp
and offensive remarks on Iran’s policy and leadership, who he fairly
considers an enemy. While our administration takes a friendly stand
toward hostile Turkey’s entire anti-Armenian policies, which threaten
the very existence of Armenia and the Armenian people: It invites the
Armenian Genocide denier Abdula Gul to Armenia, meanwhile urging our
people to respect the enemy flag and national anthem. The terminology
alone used by Armenia’s high ranking politicians and statesmen is a
clear indication that Armenia’s Turkish policy has adopted, with one
to one match, US State Department’s positions, which in no way reflec
t the interests of Armenia and the Armenian people. In other words,
the Armenian foreign policy views Turkey through Washington’s glasses."

– One of the abnormal policies, that you have mentioned, is the
constantly trumpeted idea in Armenia that the Armenian-Turkish border
should be opened, creating the impression that it is Armenia that
has closed that border!

– Of course such an impression will be created, due to the complete
lack of analyses, in our society, of the deep complexities of the
Turkish-Armenian conflict. Actually, and paradoxically, Turkophile
propaganda was carried instead, as a number of our national symbols
were distorted: Mt Ararat was removed from our coat of arms on
footballers shirts, the floodlights were turned off in Tsitsernakaberd
Genocide Memorial during the football match and, most puzzlingly, the
incomprehensible call to stand up while the Turkish national anthem was
being played! But who said this is a requirement! And why should any
Armenian respect the anthem of a country whose policy towards Armenia
and the Armenians is hostile, aggressive and offensive – denying the
Genocide, blockade, encouragement of, and assistance to Azerbaijan in
the latter’s preparations to resume war, trampling on Armenian pride
and dignity in the international arena, distortion and smearing of
Armenian history and culture … ! Whereas to this day Jewish people
generally avoid buying German-made products;20for instance, hardly
any Jew will drive a "Mercedes". They remember what Germany has done
to them, even though that country has accepted its responsibility and
given billions of dollars in retribution, through which they’ve been
able to develop the Israeli economy. Despite that, the Jews value their
national dignity above and beyond these. And that’s because the Jews
realise that national dignity is an essential state-building factor. By
compromising on that you cede your identity, you weaken your resistance
propensity and your strategic memory, you fail to orient yourself in
the current situation, you make elementary mistakes, and, of course,
you get punished with new massacres. Unfortunately, this chain of
events has repeatedly struck our people in the past. But now that we
have statehood, repeating the same mistake is just unacceptable.

In that case what did that misguided policy gain (for the Armenian
people) and what did Turkey gain?

The people didn’t gain anything. This is a problem of
statehood. Armenia gained nothing, except for a few words of praise
from a couple of American and European diplomats. Instead, the process
of international recognition of the Armenian Genocide is now under
the threat of being torpedoed The expressed agreement of Armenia’s
president to the creation of a commission of historians is not only
a blow against the recognition process, but it could also cast do
ubt in the minds of third parties as to the validity of the fact
of the crime. The Turkish Foreign Minister has already explicitly
stated that third countries have no right to discuss this question
anymore since Turkey and Armenia have found common ground! This while
Erdogan’s spekesman on party matters, Egemen Bagis, declared that,
Turkey will never accept the Armenian assertions, that Turks have
already examined over a million documents which, supposedly, show that
there was no genocide, and that actually it may become clear that
it were the Armenians who massacred the Turks! Erdogan’s spekesman
made this statement at the European Economic Forum held in Krynica,
Poland, on 10-13 September. Therefore Turkey is already reaping the
benefits of this new situation while Armenia has gained nothing.

-Currently the view is being circulated that the opening of the border
will benefit Armenia (more than it can cause harm). Do you share this
approach, and how well-founded is this view?

– The Armenian-Turkish conflict has many other layers, ignoring
which may have even worse consequences. Even if the two countries
establish diplomatic relations and the Turkish blockade is lifted,
the problem still will not be resolved. Turkey will continue its
hostile politics through other means – namely economic, propaganda and
cultural infiltration, renewed opportunities for triggering demographic
movements (unfavourable to Armenia), and thr ough other means As
far as the economy is concerned, the local producers will certainly
suffer from border opening as the imported goods will be much cheaper,
and secondly, opening of the border will serve as a tool in the hands
of Turkey to exert all sorts of pressures on Armenia. In fact, the
three preconditions that Turkey has put forward on Armenia are only
preliminary preconditions! As we know in the past 15 years various
other preconditions have also been raised, among others, taking the
"Meghri corridor" out of Armenia’s control, destroying the Kurdish
Workers Party (PKK) bases allegedly stationed in Armenia, and other
demands. This is tried and tested old politics, and not just Turkish
politics. One often hears these days that ‘we are weak and have no
options’. But if one makes concessions on life and death issues, one
might as well dig one’s grave! If it’s one’s life that’s threatened,
and the big powers tell you to make concessions, you shouldn’t heed
as you reduce your chances of self-defence and resistance, without
getting any serious security guarantees. Meanwhile, we have already
started making concessions.

– Mr Ayvazyan, not long ago our National Assembly approved
the country’s National Security Strategy. Does that document
adequately serve our foreign policy, especially as it relates to the
disentanglement of Armenian-Turkish relations?

0A- In that document the Armenian-Turkish conflict has not been
defined, its limits obscured, and most importantly the Armenian
Question has been ignored, as far as its core fundamental parameter –
the territorial aspect – is concerned. Before opening up to Turkey,
Armenia must get decisive security guarantees from Turkey. What is at
issue is not the lifting of the blockade, but termination by Turkey of
its hostile policies against Armenia and Armenians. Whereas such an
impression is created today as though we have no confidence-building
problem, that we trust the Turks and desire to start everything
from a "blank page". But who can tell whether Turkey will change
its hostile policy after opening the border? No they won’t but will
set off an ideological, economic and cultural invasion. It is us
that need confidence building mechanisms not the Turks! We pose no
threat to the Turks, they pose a threat to us. Both economically and
demographically, we are just about the size of a Turkish vilayet,
and can be easily absorbed, especially if we turn a blind eye on
the Armenian-Turkish conflict and are preparing to give up our
national dignity and identity. I’ve stressed many times before,
that it should be us, Armenia, that puts forward preconditions and
not Turkey. Those preconditions are the very security guarantees. We
must demand proofs from Turkey that it is abandoning its ho stile
policy towards us. Meanwhile, today Turkey’s worldwide anti-Armenian
propaganda includes very strong/powerful idealogical elements, about
which we don’t speak in Armenia.

Today our government thinks that it conducts pragmatic politics. But
pragmatism takes into account the goals, ideology, and strategic
thinking of the opposite side. Our policy doesn’t take these into
account; they see neither Turkey’s objectives, nor their underlying
strategy and ideology.

– Do our statesmen take any interest in the concerns you express in
your public pronouncements, say, any phone calls inviting you to sit
down with them to discuss these issues?

– This question is of critical importance. Armenia’s foreign policy,
since 1991, has been under profound and disorienting influence of
foreign, especially American and European strategies. As far as
national security is concerned, there is practically no interaction
or contacts with our own home-grown national thought, which is
ignored and left unnoticed. Today we harvest the bitter fruits of
that influence. Armenia’s foreign policy today is so far from its
national foundations – particularly in regards to conceptualising
the territorial nature of the Armenian question – that it has lost
the ability to see the enemy and its political objectives, which
weakness is pregnant with extreme consequences for Armenia.

–Boundary_(ID_NLmY/PyP+04oO9mNb/k41A)–

Yerevan City Hall To Fight Against Vandalism In Cemeteries

YEREVAN CITY HALL TO FIGHT AGAINST VANDALISM IN CEMETERIES

ARKA
Oct 13, 2008

YEREVAN, October 13. /ARKA/. The Yerevan City Hall intends to fight
against vandalism in city cemeteries, stated first Vice-Mayor of
Yerevan Kamo Areyan.

"Occurrences of brigandage have lately increased both in individual
and family burial places," Areyan told reporters today.

According to Areyan, brigandage involves robbery of nonferrous metals
and stones that cover gravestones and fencings.

"Vandalism is in our nation’s psychology," Areyan noted.

Touching upon fighting methods, Areyan stressed the importance to
have strong fences for burial places, as well as a closer surveillance.

Yerevan cemeteries currently occupy a total area of
547.5hectares.

The Long Path To ‘Avrupa’

THE LONG PATH TO ‘AVRUPA’
By Dietmar Pieper

Spiegel Online
,1518,584066,00.html
Germany

Turkey’s push towards Europe, a drive that is older than the country
itself, has long to helped to hold the internally divided country
together.

Editor’s Note: The Frankfurt Book Fair, the world’s largest publishing
event, opened its doors for its 60th year on Tuesday. Close to 7,400
exhibitors from 100 countries are presenting literature at the event,
including 3,300 German publishers. This year’s guest country is
Turkey, which is represented by 165 publishing houses. This week,
SPIEGEL ONLINE will run a series of features and interviews about
Turkey in conjunction with the book fair opening.

Next to the steep, red marble staircase, a small cable car provides
a jolting ride up the hill. After having been given a good shaking,
visitors emerge unsteadily from the car and look around. A hundred
meters above the gate at the street below, in a house surrounded by
hibiscus bushes and fig trees, lives Yasar Kemal. A world-class author,
Kemal is considered the eminence grise of Turkish literature.

After greeting his guests, Kemal sits down in an armchair in front
of the fireplace. A large window offers a panoramic view across the
Bosporus, encompassing Istanbul’s Asian and European sides. Ferries,
oil tankers and fast, white yachts glide beneath the large suspension
bridge connecting the two sides of Istanbul, the Occident and the
Orient. The minarets of Hagia Sophia and the Blue Mosque punctuate
the city’s skyline.

Strong, black tea is served in small, stemmed glasses, and Kemal talks
about his life. And what a life it has been! He spent his childhood
in Cukurova, a fertile strip of land in religiously conservative
southeastern Anatolia. At the age of five, he witnessed his father
being stabbed to death during a family quarrel in the mosque. He
began to stutter, but telling stories and writing poetry became
his passion. He was a journalist and a socialist politician. He
was imprisoned three times because the things he said and wrote
displeased the powers that be. He was tortured and was long unable to
talk about the experience. He refers, only half in jest, to prison as
"the school of Turkish literature."

Kemal is a Kurd, and for he and his wife Ayse, a mathematics professor,
it is a matter of course that they speak Kurdish at home. But it is
the Turkish language in which he writes his novels, in his clear,
almost calligraphic handwriting — novels that always have something
to do with the history of his country.

Kemal has experienced everything that can possibly happen to a writer
and intellectual in Turkey. He has been condemned, and he has been
venerated. He is even patriotic, in his own way. "Anatolia can be
seen as a source for the world’s cultures," he says. He is pleased
that his country is being presented as the guest of honor at the
Frankfurt Book Fair this year, but he says that he will not submit to
the commotion of the fair and the stress of the trip again. "Younger
people should do that," he says, emitting a deep, warm and slightly
roguish laugh. He has been to Germany many times, including in 1997,
when he was awarded the Peace Prize of the German Book Trade.

A few steps from the fireplace, in front a wall of bookshelves, is his
desk, with a few sheets of ivory-colored paper and dozens of sharpened
pencils on it. Kemal is working on the fourth volume of his "island
novels," the story of refugees who are forced to start a new life on
an island in the Aegean Sea. There are so many stories to tell, says
Kemal, from the days when the Ottoman Empire was going under, and when
World War I and the ensuing confusion plunged millions upon millions
of people into hopeless destitution. But he also has a simple message
to impart: "Anyone who starts a war should never see the sky again."

Kemal was born 1923, although he does not know the exact date. It
was the year in which the Turkish Republic was founded. His life is
closely intertwined with the history of Turkey, a history that has
always progressed in one direction, politically, economically and
culturally: from East to West.

Although Kemal has left his native Anatolia behind, and has been
living in Istanbul for more than half a century, Anatolia continues to
shape much of his life today. He grew up in the tradition of village
storytellers. "At the age of eight, I sang folk songs in public. I was
called Kemal the Singer," he says. It was not until he became a young
man that he shifted gears to write. It was a difficult transition.

Instead of the Kurdish and Turkmen popular poets, his new role models
were the great European novelists: Goethe, Tolstoy and Stendhal —
especially Stendhal — as well as America’s Faulkner.

Kemal’s path through life has been long. His country, restless and
wild, is still a traveler along its own path. "Turkey has been trying
to become ‘Western’ for 250 years," he says. Avrupa, Turkish for
Europe, is a fateful word for Turkey.

An especially radical figure in its past was Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, the
founder of the Turkish republic, who remains sacrosanct in Turkey to
this day. "He was a strong leader," says Kemal. Great achievements are
associated with this historic mission, as are immense sacrifices. The
lives of millions of Armenians and Greeks, Kurds and Alevi have been
lost along the way. "They were determined to turn the mosaic that
Anatolia had become over the course of its history into a unified
state," says Kemal, as he sits up in his chair with an angry expression
on his face. "That was the greatest catastrophe."

Cem Ozdemir is a good person to ask when it comes to explaining Turkey
to the West. The Green Party politician, born in 1965 in Bad Urach in
southwestern Germany, is both a bridge-builder and a self-starter. He
was the first member of the German parliament, the Bundestag, of
Turkish descent. On talk shows, he liked to refer to himself as the
"Anatolian from Swabia," a region in the southwestern German state
of Baden-Wurttemburg. He had the misfortune of accepting a donation
from a dubious PR consultant, a scandal that made Ozdemir front-page
news. To clear his name, he resigned and ran for a seat in the European
Parliament, but he may soon experience a roaring comeback — as the
national head of Germany’s Green Party.

Ozdemir is participating in a public discussion forum in
Bonn. Turkey is the focus of this year’s Bonn Biennale, a theater and
cultural festival. The panel is discussing the modern and European
characteristics of a country whose 74 million citizens are almost all
Muslim. Is democracy taking hold? Is there a risk that Turkey could
slide into Islamism?

There are no easy answers to these questions, as Ozdemir explains with
the nuanced picture he presents. But there are trends and developments,
and there is reason to be cautiously optimistic. The politician, who
calls Turkey his "second home," points to the reforms of the last 10
years: laws banning forced marriages, honor killings and marital rape,
the relaxation of taboos relating to controversial issues like the
Kurdish question, Cyprus and the Armenians.

"Whenever I appeared on Turkish television in the past," Ozdemir says,
"I would ask the interviewer, before an interview began, which topics
we could not discuss. Sometimes it was so absurd that it boiled down
to a choice of words. For instance, a journalist would say: We don’t
refer to the ‘Kurds.’ ‘Okay, what are you calling them now?’ I would
ask. The journalist would respond by referring to something like the
‘Southeastern Anatolia question.’ That was Turkey. And this wasn’t
even that long ago."

There was a period in the 1990s when Ozdemir was Public Enemy No. 2
for some Turkish media outlets. The tabloid Hurriyet had a penchant for
printing his photo next to that of Abdullah Ocalan, the leader of the
Kurdish separatist group PKK (Kurdistan Workers Party), the implication
being: Look, two traitors! But Ozdemir’s supposed infractions amounted
to nothing more than condemning the Turkish military’s war against the
Kurds and upholding democracy. He became the subject of vile threats,
and bodyguards soon became a part of his daily life.

But things change, and Ozdemir is convinced that they will continue
to. "The fundamental issue is that we accept others, and that includes
their religion or atheism, their Kurdish or Cherkessian language,
their Alevi ‘cem evi,’ or meeting house, Jewish synagogue or Greek
Orthodox church. That’s all," he says.

Is this a vision? Of course it is. Ozdemir believes that visions
don’t necessarily have to be harmful in politics. He’s also a realist,
though. "Unfortunately, Turkish society is deeply divided and, sadly,
a large segment of the political elite is failing." His hopes rest
on those who are not part of any camp: not the diehard Kemalists,
who see every woman wearing the headscarf as the advance guard of
a theocracy, and not the religious fundamentalists, who dream of
infiltrating the state.

Ozdemir gesticulates energetically on the podium in Bonn, and then he
leans back to discuss the subject from a broader perspective. "From
the Arab standpoint, Turkey was a colonial power first, then the
West’s listening post in the Cold War. Nowadays, Arab intellectuals
look to Turkey because it presents the historically unique opportunity
to achieve a democracy, with all its trappings, in a majority Muslim
society." For the Arab world, says Ozdemir, this is an alternative to
the model of Islamism and to the authoritarian models of government
in Tunisia and Egypt.

Ozdemir’s next sentence is a political one, meant to bring everything
together: "Turkey must take this third approach." It sounds a bit
mysterious, but perhaps this is the best prediction a politician can
make when it comes to a country like Turkey.

Part 2: Istanbul is Europe’s Megacity

Yasar Kemal and his wife, Ayse, have had a new favorite haunt in
Istanbul for the past few years. Once or twice a week, they drive
from their home on the Asian side of the city across the bridge to
the European side, to go out to dinner. Their destination is the
"Istanbul Modern," a privately run art museum in a former warehouse
in the port district that opened in late 2004. The museum restaurant
offers a spectacular view of the water at the point where the Golden
Horn inlet and the Bosporus converge. "We enjoy the quiet, the view,
the art and the fine white wine," says Kemal.

Oya Eczacibasi is especially proud of having a celebrity of Kemal’s
magnitude as a regular guest. Eczacibasi, who comes from one of
the wealthiest families in Turkey, is both the chief curator of the
Istanbul Modern Sanat Muzesi and the heart and mind of the entire
spectacular enterprise. A member of her staff calls it "the unofficial
Turkish national museum for modern art" — absent an official version.

Eczacibasi would never put it that directly, at least not publicly. The
49-year-old curator is the epitome of elegance and diplomatic
reserve. But it quickly becomes clear that, beneath her polished
exterior, Eczacibasi is a woman with an iron will.

"It took us 15 years to build this museum," she says. A contract
with the city of Istanbul had already been fleshed out in 1990,
but the agreement fell apart two years later. At the same time,
Eczacibasi received her first painting as a gift to a still nonexistent
museum. The large, two-by-five-meter (6.5-by-16-foot) work by the
artist Fahrelnissa Zeid, titled "My Hell," now has a place of honor
in the museum. The family that owned the work came to Eczacibasi and
said: "We are giving you this painting. We are confident that you
will build a museum."

A period of persistent lobbying work followed. "I spoke with many
prime ministers and cabinet ministers, but no one was interested in
a museum for modern art." Then, in 2003, it was, ironically enough,
Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the chairman of the Islamic
Party for Justice and Development (AKP), who became fired up about
the idea. "We showed him this building. We explained to him that it
was very well suited for our purposes, but that it needed access to
the street. He said: ‘Don’t worry, that will be taken care of.’"

And it was taken care of, so quickly and thoroughly, in fact, that
the Istanbul Modern opened on Dec. 11, 2004, almost coinciding with
the European Union summit in Copenhagen, at which the decision over
negotiations between the Europeans and Turkey over Turkey’s accession
to the EU was made. An agonizing week of negotiations ended with a
cautious "yes" vote — with reservations.

Eczacibasi smiles when asked about whether Erdogan was thinking about
Copenhagen when he threw his support behind her museum.

Most Germans would probably name London or Paris as Europe’s largest
city, or perhaps Moscow. But few would consider Istanbul, and yet
there is good reason to believe that that honor should in fact go to
Turkey’s megacity.

According to current estimates, more than 10 million, possibly even
15 million people live along the Bosporus. A large portion of the
metropolitan area, including the historic old city, is on the European
side. Istanbul’s three biggest football clubs — Besiktas, Fenerbahce
and Galatasaray — have participated in European competitions
for decades. And two years ago, the EU Council of Ministers took a
remarkable step when, on Nov. 13, 2006, it declared Istanbul Europe’s
Cultural Capital for 2010.

The road to that decision was just as remarkable as the decision
itself. It began eight years ago, when a Turkish professor discovered
that, in 1999, the EU changed the rules under which it awards the title
and funding. Under the new rules, cities in non-European countries
could also qualify. A group of private citizens quickly came together,
declaring it their goal to make Istanbul Europe’s official cultural
capital. The politicians joined the effort later on, after all the
preparatory work had been done.

Nuri Colakoglu, the director of Istanbul 2010, is extremely proud
of the award. "Our project is the first in this series that can be
attributed to a purely civilian initiative." The project is also backed
by copious private funding and economic might. In Turkey, leading
entrepreneurial families, with names like Eczacibasi (pharmaceutical
industry), Sabanci (banks, commerce), Koc (energy) and Dogan (media),
play an important role as patrons of the arts.

Istanbul 2010 director Colakoglu is the vice-president of the Dogan
Group, which owns Hurriyet and the television network CNN Turk. If
anyone has the wherewithal to make Istanbul 2010 a success, it’s
a man like Nuri Colakoglu. A journalist by trade, Colakoglu is
a notorious early riser, constantly on the go and extremely well
connected. "Together with six other madmen," he says, "I convinced
Bernie Ecclestone to bring Formula 1 racing to Istanbul a few years
ago. We kept needling Bernie until he said yes."

Colakoglu shows off his offices with the practiced graciousness of a
busy host. Istanbul 2010 is headquartered in a magnificent downtown
mansion built as the winter home of an Armenian banker in the 19th
century. Colakoglu, pointing to erotic murals on the high ceilings,
says that the owner occasionally lent his house to the sultan, so
that he could meet his mistresses there.

The program for the big cultural festival is gradually taking
shape. One of the high points will be a performance by the Berlin
Philharmonic in exactly two years. Other events are still in the
planning stages. "We want to offer the broadest possible panorama
of our city and our country," says Colakoglu. As part of his 2010
agenda, he wants Turks to "engage with our historical heritage, which
has been overlooked for so long." The picture Istanbul will present
to its citizens and the world will likely touch on taboos. From
avant-garde artists to devout Islamic groups, Kurds, Armenians and
other minorities — the goal is to include them all.

Is this a political statement? No, of course not, says Colakoglu,
before letting out a laugh. "We try to avoid all things
political. Politics are dangerous in this country."

Part 3: ‘Islamic Calvanism’

A bright yellow scrubbing machine moves back and forth across
the sand-colored travertine tiles. The parade grounds in front
of Ataturk’s mausoleum in Ankara, with a capacity of 15,000, must
sparkle before soldiers, politicians and diplomats arrive. Today,
a delegation from India is here to pay its respects to Ataturk,
the father of the Turkish nation, who died in 1938.

The site, known as Anitkabir in Turkish, is large enough to encompass
a small city. The remains of the man who invented modern Turkey
have been buried here since Nov. 10, 1953. No official visitor to
the Turkish capital can avoid a visit to the memorial. When Iranian
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad visited Turkey in August, he traveled to
Istanbul and not Ankara, to avoid having to bow in front of Ataturk’s
mausoleum. Throughout his lifetime, the legendary Turkish leader
had nothing but contempt for Islam. He is said to have referred to
the religion of Muhammad as "the absurd religious doctrine of an
amoral Bedouin."

The veneration of Ataturk knows no limits in Anitkabir, which receives
a constant flow of visitors from all over Turkey: men in dark suits
and others in shorts, bent-over peasant women, chic urbanites who
have flung a shiny "turban" over their heads and necks as a sign of
their piety, and young girls in midriff-exposing tops.

The exhibit is a bizarre mixture of cult altar and Disneyland. It
includes wax figures of Ataturk in formal dress and Ataturk at
this desk, his complete wardrobe, from his military uniform to his
gray silk pajamas, his revolver, cigarette holders, perfume flasks,
hairbrushes and "Fox," his stuffed hunting dog. War panoramas with
life-sized figures recreate scenes from the battles that made him a
legendary figure when he was a general. The sound track blaring from
the loudspeakers includes death cries and warlike chants.

The sarcophagus is at the center of the memorial, but the 40-ton
block of stone is merely a solid piece of marble.

Ataturk lies buried in a crypt that is closed to the public. A camera
transmits a live image from the interior of the octagonal burial
chamber onto a flat-screen monitor. An information panel states that
the body of this outspoken critic of religion was embalmed according
to Islamic ritual and wrapped in sheets of cloth. The red marble
coffin is pointed toward the Kaaba in Mecca.

Mecca lies thousands of kilometers southeast of Ankara in Saudi Arabia,
and yet the dead man’s entire life was oriented toward the West.

Aladdin Boulevard is a tidy street that passes through the center
of Konya. The city in the Anatolian highlands was once the seat of
the Seljuks, a Turkic people who began the conquest of Asia Minor in
the Middle Ages. Today it is a stronghold for Islamic parties. In a
recent election, more than 70 percent of the city’s voters voted for
Prime Minister Erdogan’s AKP. Konya is nicknamed the "green capital"
of Turkey, green being the color of Islam.

But while Konya’s past mayors supported gender separation on public
transportation and a total ban on alcohol within city limits,
nowadays women with and without headscarves stroll in front of the
stone Iplikci Mosque, young couples walk hand-in-hand and roadside
signs advertise shops licensed to sell beer, wine and Raki, the
anise-based national brandy.

Akif Emre, a journalist with the pro-government daily newspaper Yeni
Safak (also known as afak), believes, paradoxically, that Erdogan’s
AKP has a moderating influence. "There is a shift in mentality,"
he says. "Conservative people are in the process of developing a
secular lifestyle."

Vedat Yondem, a representative of the Konya Chamber of Commerce
and Industry, sits in his freshly mowed front yard, extolls similar
views. "In the past, we only paid attention to ourselves, but today we
look to the rest of the world. We have become more open-minded." This
sentiment is supported by the experience of many small and mid-sized
business owners in Anatolia, who have created their own economic
miracle and now play a self-confident role in a globalized world,
conducting trade with the EU, Africa and China.

Turkish industry and agriculture were dependent on the government in
Ankara for decades. The country was run in a centralized way and kept
isolated from the outside world. But then, in the wake of energetic
reforms introduced under Prime Minister Turgut Ozal, thousands of
new businesses sprang up in the 1990s.

Almost overnight, sleepy provincial cities like Konya, Kayseri and
Gaziantep mutated into "Anatolian tigers," suddenly proud of their
mushrooming industrial zones and gleaming office towers. There is such
a strong, symbiotic relationship here between business and religion
that sociologists see "Islamic Calvinism" at work.

But the ordinary people have remained deeply pious. For centuries,
pilgrims have been converging on Konya to visit the sarcophagus of
Mevlana Celaleddin Rumi, the great Muslim poet and mystic, and the
founder of the Dervish order. Many treat the path to the grave of
the master as a minor pilgrimage, even though Islam in fact forbids
the worship of holy men.

"This house is the Kaaba of lovers. The immature are made adults
here." These words, written in the Persian language, are inscribed
above the "Gate of the Dervishes." In the 13th century, Mevlana taught
the virtues of love and tolerance, as well as humility and modesty. To
break the power of the religious order, Kemal Ataturk had Mevlana’s
monastery turned into a museum in 1926.

The faithful fold their hands together in front of Mevlana’s stone
sarcophagus. Others snap a photo with their mobile phones and keep
going. Thick panels of glass protect the relics, which were once owned
by the brotherhood and now belong to the state. They include a golden
casket containing a strand of hair from the prophet’s beard and a tiny,
ornately decorated Koran. There is also an even smaller Koran, "written
with the eyelashes of a beautiful woman, completed after 16 years,
at which point the woman became blind," a winking guide explains.

It was not until 1954 that the Turkish government allowed the
Dervishes to dance again. Even today the Sufis are not permitted to
mark the anniversary of Mevlana’s death in their house of worship,
the "tarikat evi," but only in a public gymnasium.

For Vedat Yondem, the businessman, this is yet another example of
Kemalist distrust. "But we will not be able to separate ourselves
from our roots," he says, with great confidence. "No one can force
us to do that."

With additional reporting by Daniel Steinvorth. Translated from the
German by Christopher Sultan

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0

Central Bank: 8-11% Economic Growth Expected In Armenia In First 3 Q

CENTRAL BANK: 8-11% ECONOMIC GROWTH EXPECTED IN ARMENIA IN FIRST 3 QUARTERS OF 2009

ARKA
Oct 14, 2008

YEREVAN, October 14. /ARKA/. According to the basic scenario, economic
growth is to constitute 8-10% in Armenia in the first three quarters
of 2009 as compared with 6-9% under the alternate scenario. A 10-11%
economic growth is expected in the fourth quarter of this year.

According to the basic scenario, the fields of services and
construction are expected to have the greatest impact on economic
growth, says the Protocol of the Central Bank of Armenia (CBA) on
forecasts and monetary and credit policy for the 4th quarter of 2008.

4-6% industrial growth rates are to be regained in the first 3
quarters of 2009 due to increase in the fields of energy, production of
construction materials, food and processing, metallurgy and chemical
industries.

Added value is expected to grow by 3-5% in the fourth quarter of this
year and industrial growth is to be provided through increase in energy
sector, processing industry and production of beverages in the period.

As per the basic scenario, mainly expanding housing construction,
processing industry and services’ sector are to help achieve a 16-17%
increase in construction area. High construction growth rates are
to be maintained in the first 3 quarters of next year; a 12-13%
construction growth in the period is attributed to expected investments
in the fields of transport, communication and energ y, metallurgy and
chemical industries. According to the alternate scenario, construction
growth is to make 8-10%.

The Central Bank made a downward adjustment to its forecast on
growth due to slowing-down rates of growth of real income of
the population and money transfers in particular. Consequently,
real growth of added value in services’ sector is to make 11-12%
in the fourth quarter. Service growth rates are expected to remain
at 9-12% in the first 3 quarters of 2009 as compared with 7-9% in
the alternate scenario. Real growth of agriculture is to be 6-8%
in the fourth quarter of this year as compared with 3% expected in
2009 due to climate conditions.

According to the CBA, a 10.5% economic growth was recorded in Armenia
in the third quarter of this year with added value of agriculture
being at 6.9% and that of industrial production at 5.2%. Industrial
growth was achieved mainly due to increasing production output of
energy sector, mining and food industries. Construction grew by 17.2%
and services’ sector by 10.7%.

A 13.6% economic growth was recorded in the country in January-August
2007.

Under the state budget, a 10% GDP growth is expected in Armenia
in 2008.

Commission For Protection Of Economic Competition Of Armenia Intends

COMMISSION FOR PROTECTION OF ECONOMIC COMPETITION OF ARMENIA INTENDS TO FINE ‘ZVARTNOTS’ YEREVAN AIRPORT TO $1 MLN DRAMS

ArmInfo
2008-10-15 11:14:00

ArmInfo. The Commission for Protection of Economic Competition
intends to fine "Zvartnots" Yerevan airport to the sum of 300 mln
drams (to $1 mln) for unfair competition, Head of the Commission’s
press service Armine Udumyan told ArmInfo.

According to her, as a result of the Commission-held monitoring,
it was revealed that "Zvartnots" delivers fuel to different air
companies at different price and, thus, demonstrates a biased attitude
to its clients.

So, the price difference varies from 483,708 drams to 494,320 drams
per 1 ton of aviation fuel. Moreover, the airport delivers fuel at
an unreasoned high price, thus, exceeding the margin for purchase
and sale of fuel which makes up $141 per ton. These violations are
enough for the Commission to make a decision to fine "Zvartnots" at
the rate of 2% of the last-year proceeds or to the sum not exceeding
300 mln drams, A. Udumyan said. The session of the Commission on this
case has been scheduled for Friday.

To recall, the concessionary of "Zvartnots" Yerevan airport and
"Shirak" Gyumri airport is the "Armenian International Airports"
CJSC belonging to the Argentine businessman Eduardo Eurnekyan.