A Powder Keg of a Region

A Powder Keg of a Region

November 1, 2008

By Dmitry Babich
Russia Profile

The problems in the Caucasus did not start in the 1990s, when the
region attracted attention from the Western press. Recent
destabilization began in 1988, when it became clear that Mikhail
Gorbachev’s perestroika did not lead to a strengthening of the Soviet
state, but rather to its weakening. It was then that the first protests
took place in Armenia, demanding the integration of Nagorny Karabakh, a
territory with a predominantly Armenian population belonging to
neighboring Azerbaijan. Since then, the Caucasus entered a period of
turmoil. It reached its peak between 1990 to 1994. Then a period of
relative stabilization followed, with Russia’s war in Chechnya being
the only zone of active conflict. The recent flare of violence in
Georgia worried many, as some experts view it as an omen of a new era
of `seismic activity.’ A brief overview of the region’s four main
conflicts could be a useful guide for understanding the current events.

The Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict

In February 1987, using the freedom of assembly recently granted by
Mikhail Gorbachev’s reformist leadership, demonstrators in Yerevan
demanded a `return’ of Nagorny Karabakh, an area where 75 percent of
the population was Armenian, but which since 1923 had belonged to
Azerbaijan. The reaction from Azerbaijan was predictably negative.

In March 1988, the regional authority in Karabakh voted in favor of
secession from Azerbaijan. Karabakh became a new point of contention
between conservatives and liberals in the CPSU’s top leadership in
Moscow, with liberals supporting Armenia. Searching for a `democratic
consensus,’ Gorbachev failed to act decisively on the ground’a
situation used by radicals all over the Caucasus.

September 1988’first clashes take place between Armenians and
Azerbaijanis in Nagorny Karabakh.

January’May 1989’Armenian nationalists from the `Karabakh’ committee,
headed by Armenia’s future president Levon Ter-Petrosyan, spend five
months imprisoned in Moscow, and return to Armenia as national heroes.

January 1990’a violent mob starts pogroms against the Armenian
population in Baku. The official estimate of the casualties is just 48
persons, although witnesses quote a much higher figure. Soviet troops
belatedly enter the city. Clashes between Azerbaijani activists and
Soviet troops lead to reprisals against the Russian inhabitants of
Baku, who also leave en masse.

December 1991’upon the proclamation of Azerbaijan’s independence as a
result of the Soviet Union’s collapse, Karabakh formally declares its
secession from Azerbaijan and a full-scale war between Armenia and
Azerbaijan erupts, with both sides using hundreds of tanks, airplanes
and artillery pieces. `Nagorno-Karabakh Republic’ de facto becomes a
militarized quasi-state inside Armenia. Azerbaijani civilians suffer
most and flee from the towns of Shusha, Khodjaly, Agdam and others.
Tens of thousands die and hundreds of thousands are displaced.

May 1994’a truce is signed, sealing an Armenian victory with 16 percent
of Azerbaijan’s territory under Armenian control.

December 2003’Azerbaijan’s president Heydar Aliyev dies without having
resolved the Karabakh conflict, despite his many meetings with Armenian
presidents Levon Ter-Petrosyan and Robert Kocharyan. As the power duly
passes to Aliyev’s son Ilham, Karabakh remains the only issue that, if
aggravated, could destabilize the regime in Baku.

Georgia versus South Ossetia, Abkhazia and Russia

At the end of the 1980s, Georgia, emerging from the seven decades of
Soviet rule, quickly proved to be not only one of the most
anti-communist, but also one of the most nationalist of the Soviet
Union’s former 15 republics. The rise of nationalists to power quickly
revealed the complexities of the country’s ethnic composition, once
arbitrarily determined by Joseph Stalin, who drew the border between
Georgia and the nations of the North Caucasus by the Caucasus ridge.
This border left several nations belonging to the North Caucasian
entity of peoples (primarily Abkhazians and Ossetians) on the territory
of Georgia, a Trans-Caucasian state with a completely different
language. Under the Soviet Union, this was a nuisance, after its
collapse it became a tragedy.

April 1989’Soviet troops violently disperse a demonstration in Tbilisi,
leading to a rise in the standing of Zviad Gamsakhurdia, a former
dissident who starts campaigning under the slogan `Georgia for the
Georgians.’

July 1989’first clashes between Abkhazians and Georgians take place in
Abkhazia.

November 1989’Zviad Gamsakhurdia is elected the chairman of Georgia’s
parliament. Although minorities make up 30 percent of the population,
only nine of the parliament’s 245 members are non-Georgians.

March 1990’the Georgian parliament annuls the autonomy of South Ossetia
and Abkhazia.

December 1990’a state of emergency is declared in Tskhinvali, the
capital of South Ossetia, because of `anti-Georgian riots.’ In two
months, fighting between Georgians and Ossetians escalates leading to
the eviction of 25,000 people from the region and the creation of a
separatist Ossetian `government’ in Tskhinvali. Gamsakhurdia says the
riots are organized by Moscow in order to keep Georgia in the Soviet
Union.

March 1991’Georgia boycotts a Moscow-sponsored referendum on preserving
the Soviet Union, in which more than 70 percent of the votes cast all
over the Soviet Union root for the preservation of the unified country.
In Abkhazia, the referendum is held with the majority voting for the
Soviet Union.

March 1991’Georgia holds a referendum on seceding from the Soviet
Union, with 90 percent of the voters saying `yes’ to the
reestablishment of the Georgian independent state that existed in 1918
to 1921. Abkhazians and Ossetians boycott the referendum. The United
States and other Western countries do not recognize Georgia until
December 1991 due to `serious human rights violations’ on the part of
Gamsakhurdia.

December 1991’January 1992’Gamsakhurdia is overthrown in a violent coup
d’etat, which brings the former Soviet Foreign Minister Eduard
Shevardnadze to power. A liberal in his Moscow days, he becomes a fiery
nationalist.

August 1992’Georgian troops move into Abkhazia, which by then had
become a de facto state within a state. Reinforced by `volunteers’ from
Chechnya and other regions of the North Caucasus, Abkhazians start a
counteroffensive.

September 1993’Abkhazians retake Sukhumi, their capital, after a
year-long war in which tens of thousands die and 250 thousand people
(mostly Georgians) are displaced. Under a truce signed with Russia’s
mediation, peacekeepers from the CIS states are to be stationed in the
areas of conflict in Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Because of the lack of
enthusiasm from other CIS countries, the peacekeeping contingent
happens to include mostly Russian troops. Initially favorable to
Russia’s mediation, Shevardnadze soon calls Russian peacekeepers
`biased.’

August 2004’Georgian forces, buoyed by the `rose revolution’ of
37-year-old new President Mikheil Saakashvili in December 2003, make
several incursions into South Ossetia, which lead to a number of
deaths. In a year, Georgia’s Defense Minister Irakly Okruashvili
promises to `celebrate the next New Year in Tskhinvali.’

August 2008’Georgian troops attack Tskhinvali after several weeks of
tension and shootouts on the line separating them from Ossetians and
Russian peacekeepers. The same day, the Russian army moves into South
Ossetia and pushes the Georgian troops out, advancing into Georgia
proper and destroying military bases in Gori and Poti.

Russia’s squabble with Chechnya

The sudden acquisition of independence by the former republics of the
Soviet Union led to a growth of nationalist sentiment among Russia’s
minorities. The logic of their thinking was simple: the ethnic
difference between, for example, Chechens and Russians is much greater
than between Russians and Belarusians. So why shouldn’t Chechens have
their own independent country, if Belarusians had theirs? Such
considerations as the size of the nation, its economic potential and
location were not taken into account. In the turmoil of the first
post-Soviet years, Moscow did not deal with the problem, but when the
Kremlin came to its senses, the `window of opportunity’ for
separatists, wide open in 1991, closed. Only Chechnya managed to use
that window on time’much to its own demise.

The Caucasus has been in turmoil since perestroika.

October 1991’in a self-styled election in Chechnya, former Soviet
general Djokhar Dudayev is elected the president of a newly proclaimed
independent state, after evicting the old Soviet leadership of the
region in an armed coup on October 7. The federal authorities in Moscow
refuse to recognize the vote as legitimate.

November 1992’a group of paratroopers sent by Russia’s Vice President
Alexander Rutskoi to arrest Dudayev is blocked in the building of the
airport in the Chechen capital Grozny.

1993 to 1994’several hostage takings occur in Russia, with kidnappers
finding a safe haven in Chechnya, which in fact becomes a free trade
zone not controlled by Russia’s customs officials.

December 1994’after several ultimatums and eight months of economic
blockade, Russian troops move into Chechnya. A planned `easy walk’ to
Grozny degenerates into a bloody guerilla war. In 1995, Dudayev is
killed by a Russian missile.

August 1996’Chechen guerillas infiltrate Russian-controlled Grozny and
ultimately force the Russian leadership to sign a truce which would
last until 1999. During the war, in 1995 and 1996, Chechen warlords
conduct several large-scale hostage takings in neighboring Russian
regions, killing hundreds.

August 1999’the war resumes as Chechen warlords attack Dagestan, a
neighboring Russian autonomy populated by Muslims. Russian troops
retake Grozny, installing Akhmat Kadyrov as the new ruler of the
republic.

May 2004’Akhmat Kadyrov is murdered by a bomb at a stadium where he
made a speech. His son Ramzan gradually establishes control. Chechnya
becomes an almost mono-ethnic state with a high degree of independence
from Russia.

The Ossetians against the Ingush

February 1944’Stalin orders deportation of the Ingush, accused of
collaborating with Nazi Germany, to Kazakhstan. Neighboring Ossetians
move into the abandoned homes of the Ingush.

1957’the Ingush are rehabilitated by Nikita Khrushchev and start to
return to their homeland. First conflicts with the Ossetians take
place.

1991’a law on repressed peoples is passed by the Supreme Soviet of the
Soviet Union. Drafted with the best of intentions, it leads to numerous
conflicts between Ossetians and Ingush, since the Ingush are formally
entitled to own their lands, which they de facto lost in 1944.

November 1992’violent clashes between Ossetians and Ingush lead to
hundreds dead and missing. More than 300 people are still unaccounted
for. The Ingush refugees live in makeshift camps or with their
relatives. The return of refugees takes decades, as refugees do not
always believe in the security guarantees of federal and local
authorities.

ANKARA: Indictment reading continues with low attendance

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
Nov 1 2008

Indictment reading continues with low attendance

The sixth session of the trial of 86 suspected members of Ergenekon, a
criminal network accused of plotting to overthrow the government, was
held yesterday, with the prosecution continuing to read the massive
indictment with the participation of fewer defendants and their
lawyers compared to previous sessions.

Only eight of the 40 suspects who were previously released pending the
outcome of the trial showed up at the courtroom yesterday, showing a
gradual decrease in the number of defendants and their lawyers
participating in the sessions.

Only one of the 46 suspects under arrest, Hayrettin Ertekin, did not
attend the session due to health reasons.

The makeshift courtroom inside Silivri Prison near İstanbul was
rather deserted in the previous session on Thursday as well, with 61
of the suspects attending the trial. Families and relatives of a large
majority of defendants did not come to watch the session, either. It
was, however, claimed by lawyers and many observers on the first day
of the trial that the small makeshift courtroom was not physically
suitable to host a fair trial.

Yesterday’s session was devoted to the continuation of reading the
massive indictment aloud like previous sessions and focused on the
links between Ergenekon and the outlawed Kurdistan Workers’ Party
(PKK). After some of the suspects’ lawyers demanded earlier this week
that the 2,455-page indictment be read out loud, the court began the
time-consuming process. It is estimated that the process will take at
least two or three more weeks. The prosecution has only been able to
finish 443 pages of the indictment in the first five sessions spent
reading it. Prosecutors read just the main headings of some parts of
the indictment instead of reading it line by line upon the approval of
lawyers.

The İstanbul 13th High Criminal Court is hearing the
case. Among the 86 suspects are retired Gen. Veli
Küçük, former İstanbul University Rector
Kemal AlemdaroÄ?lu, lawyer Kemal Kerinçsiz, who is known
for filing suits against intellectuals over their writings questioning
or criticizing the state line on issues such as Armenian allegations
of genocide, and retired Capt. Muzaffer Tekin. The session was also
followed by reporters from Japanese daily Asahi Shimbun, one of the
most widely circulated dailies in the world. Brief tension erupted
between prosecutor Mehmet Ali Pekgüzel and Workers’ Party
(İP) leader DoÄ?u Perinçek, after the prosecutor
defined Perinçek as İP leader at the time he reportedly
met with jailed PKK leader Abdullah Ã-calan. "I was not the
İP leader then. You say the meeting took place in 1997. It was
[in fact] in 1989. You will nearly say it occurred before Christ,"
said Perinçek.

Another moment of tension was observed between the presiding judge,
Köksal Å?engün, and Oktay
Yıldırım, a noncommissioned officer retired from
the army. Prosecutors read a part from the indictment that alleged a
hand grenade found in Yıldırım’s house in
Ã`mraniye in 2007, which set off the Ergenekon investigation, had
the same serial number as those used in an attack at a café
belonging to a man named İbrahim
�iftçi. �iftçi, who was a suspect in the
murder of secular academic Necip HablemitoÄ?lu and who is also
suspected of links to Ergenekon according to the prosecutor, died in
the attack in 2006.

"No, they didn’t have the same serial numbers," said
Yıldırım, who was ordered by Köksal to
limit his explanations to his defense. Köksal also warned
another suspect, retired Capt. Muzaffer Tekin, to watch his words when
he said that he was more honest and dignified than the judges.

Ahmet Ã`lger, lawyer for Oktay Yıldırım and
retired Maj. Zekeriya Ã-ztürk, claimed the İstanbul
Police Department’s counterterrorism unit currently has a list of
2,500 people to be taken into custody as part of the Ergenekon
investigation.

In the meantime, a group of people identifying themselves as
"Patriotic Intellectuals," including veteran Turkish filmmaker Halit
RefiÄ?, journalist Banu Avar and actor Altan Günbay, were
allowed to enter the courtroom to watch the session.

One of the members of the group told press members that they went to
Silivri Prison to show their support for the Ergenekon suspects. "The
Ergenekon case is not a reassuring process. The suspects should
immediately be released," he stated.

Former prosecutor claims Ergenekon is as strong as before

Gültekin Avcı, a former chief prosecutor, has recently
compiled his impressions on the Ergenekon investigation in a book, in
which he asserts the organization is as strong as it was before it was
uncovered. "Though the trial process has started for Ergenekon
suspects, the organization is as strong as it was before. For this
illegal network to be completely uncovered, you need to have its
members in the military appear before the judge, as well," he told the
Cihan news agency.

Likening Ergenekon to a living nightmare, Avcı said a full
revelation of the organization would help restore democracy in
Turkey. He also stated it was worth noticing that separatist and
terrorist acts have increased in the country as the Ergenekon probe
gets deeper.

"As the investigation moves toward the nucleus of the organization,
separatist and terrorist acts have increased across the country. The
indictment also clearly mentions this direct link, pointing to the
attack on the US Consulate General and bloody assaults by the PKK,"
Avcı added. A deadly armed attack on the US Consulate General
in İstanbul in July left three Turkish police officers
dead. Many strategists and observers voiced the opinion that the
attack could be related to an ongoing investigation into Ergenekon.

01 November 2008, Saturday

BÃ`Å?RA ERDAL, NURİ İMRE, TODAY’S ZAMAN WITH WIRES İSTANBUL

Session Of CIS Inter-State Council In The Field Of Periodical Press

SESSION OF CIS INTER-STATE COUNCIL IN THE FIELD OF PERIODICAL PRESS GOES ON IN CHOLPON ATA

ARMENPRESS
Oct 29, 2008

CHOLPON ATA, OCTOBER 29, ARMENPRESS: The 11th session of CIS
inter-state council in the field of periodicals, book publication,
distribution of books and polygraph started its works on the eve in
Kyrgyz Cholpon Ata town.

The agenda of the two-day session includes issues of implementation
of decisions made during the previous tenth session of the council,
particularly the preparation of drafts on creating favorable conditions
for Declaration about Book Support and exchange of printed product,
results of fifth international competition "Art of the Book" of CIS
countries, implementation of agreements of cooperation in the fields
of book publication, distribution of books and polygraph and the
issue of establishment of CIS print organ.

Participants of the session will also discuss the pace of events
dedicated to the year of literature and reading, the resolution of
the third conference of creative and scientific intelligence and a
number of other issues.

The inter-state council of CIS cooperation in the fields of
periodicals, book publication, distribution of books and polygraph
was established in 1999.

EuroVision: Sirusho Comes To Lemesos!

EXCLUSIVE: SIRUSHO COMES TO LEMESOS!

Eurovision.tv
age/news?id=1449
Oct 30 2008
Switzerland

Sirusho, who successfully represented Armenia at the 2008
Eurovision Song Contest with Qele, Qele, will travel to Cyprus in
November to support the Armenian Junior Eurovision Song Contest
participants. ARMTV’s Narek Adonts confirmed that to Eurovision.tv
moments ago.

Armenia will be represented by Monika Manucharova, who will sing Im
Ergi Hnchyune in Lemesos on the 22nd of November. Armenian superstar
Sirusho will also pack for Cyprus, to support, guide and advise the
young singer representing her country in the lead up to the Junior
Eurovision Song Contest.

Sirusho, who was increadibly popular amongst Eurovision Song Contest
fans and was even tipped to win the 2008 running, but finished on a
respectable 4th position in the Final.

The role of Armenia’s former Eurovision Song Contest hope is limited to
supporting the young delegates in Cyprus, and Sirusho is not scheduled
to make an appearance on the show itself. However, Eurovision.tv
will definitely catch up with her to find out more about Sirusho’s
post-Eurovision Song Contest experiences.

The 2008 Junior Eurovision Song Contest, the 6th running, will take
place on the 22nd of November in Lemesos, Cyprus. For more information,
check out

http://www.eurovision.tv/p
www.junioreurovision.tv.

EU To Develop Relations With Eastern Partnership Countries

EU TO DEVELOP RELATIONS WITH EASTERN PARTNERSHIP COUNTRIES

PanARMENIAN.Net
29.10.2008 14:08 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The European Union will develop relations with all
member countries of the Eastern Partnership, said Raul de Luzenberger,
head of the European Commission delegation to Armenia.

"We are waiting for the partner states’ proposals to discuss them
early next year. The European Union and the European Commission have
opened a dialog with these countries," he said.

"We understand that to implement the essential reforms, the public,
authorities and opposition should demonstrate political will and
constructive approach. So, we do offer our assistance," Mr. de
Luzenberger said, adding that presently Armenia is carrying out a
reform of the legal system for which 17 million euro is supposed to
be assigned.

"All this is a part of Eastern Partnership program. We know that it’s
a long process and time is needed for any tangible result," he said.

Trilateral Talks To Be Resumed

TRILATERAL TALKS TO BE RESUMED

Hayots Ashkhar Daily
29 Oct 2008
Armenia

Yesterday Khoulusi Kylydj, Ambassador of Turkey in Azerbaijan,
announced that the trilateral talks with the participation of the
Armenian, Azerbaijani and Turkish sides are going to be resumed in
the near future.

Mr. Kylydj also mentioned that the place and time of the next
trilateral meeting of the Foreign Ministers is being specified through
diplomatic channels.

"Turkey has recently become a non-permanent member of the UN Security
Council. Having assumed new duties, Turkey will strive for and direct
all its efforts to the settlement of the ‘frozen conflicts’, including
the conflict of Karabakh," the Ambassador added.

One of the sources of the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry has announced
in its turn that the trilateral meeting of the Foreign Ministers will
probably take place in Helsinki, within the frameworks of the annual
session of the Council of Ministers of the Organization for Security
and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE).

This year, the session of the OSCE Council of Ministers is to take
place in the capital city of Finland on December 4-5.

Christian Leaders Conduct Int’l Dialogue on ME Church Crises

;page=0

Evangelicals for Middle East Understanding

Sounds of Hope (2008)

Christian Leaders Conduct International Dialogue on Middle Eastern Church
Crises.

AMMAN, JORDAN – In a strategic gathering of Middle Eastern, European and
American Christian leaders, westerners were given an inside view of the
Middle Eastern Church’s struggle in a war-torn land.

Evangelicals for Middle East Understanding’s (EMEU) Sounds of Hope II
conference was held in Amman, Jordan on Oct. 15-18. It was a time for over
70 select individuals from various ministries to hear from 11 speakers with
experience in the Middle East Church.

According to Dr. Ray Bakke, EMEU chair, the conference was held out of a
concern that ignorance in the West was negatively influencing the worldwide
Church. "We had people who are evangelical who thought that every Arab was a
terrorist or a fat oil sheik," he said.

EMEU’s purpose is to break down those stereotypes through direct dialog and
help to build relationships and understanding across different cultures. As
Bakke put it, "It’s not an organization, it’s a conversation."

Three aspects stood out for Tom Bower, an attendee from Iowa: exposition of
biblical material as it relates the Middle East today, a clearer definition
of the area’s political and economic issues, and "wonderful networking"
between Church leaders from across the globe and across the denominational
spectrum.

Speakers from Sudan, Egypt, Jordan, Israel, Palestine, Lebanon and Iraq
shared on everything from the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, to America’s
role in the Middle East, to a loving Christian response to Islam.

Dr. Nabeel Jabbour shared his concern that, after September 11th, some
Christians would quit praying for and ministering to Muslims. "If that
happens it will be the biggest setback in the history of missions," he said.
"Muslims are about 1.4 billion people in the world. It’s predicted that by
the year 2020 they’ll become a quarter of humanity. If we consciously or
unconsciously omit them from the Great Commission it will become no more the
Great Commission; it will be the Great Omission."

Jabbour walked attendees through the different belief systems in Islam,
explaining that only a small percentage of Muslims are actually radical
fundamentalists, but it is the activities of this faction that make the
news.

John Sagherian, regional coordinator for Youth for Christ International,
said that young Muslims as well as nominal Christians in the Middle East are
asking the same question when presented with the biblical truth of
salvation: "So what?" He said that they need more than textbook answers.

"I believe the answer lies in our changed lives and our changed values and
our love for each other," Sagherian said. "They need to see Christians
living as Christians. And it would help if there were a revival in the West
and the Christian West really became Christian."

But the underlying frustration behind many of the messages given at the
conference was over the apathy of westerners toward the Arab Church.
Speakers said Christian Zionists have fixated on the renewal of the Israeli
state, while ignoring severe abuse of the Palestinian people’s rights.

"Our message to the Jewish people (should be) that it is in the person of
Jesus the Messiah that their hopes have been fulfilled, not in their return
to the land and in the creation of the state of Israel," said author and
educator Rev. Colin Chapman. "When I see how Jesus has already fulfilled so
many of the hopes and dreams of Israel (prophesied of) in the Old Testament,
I can see how. the followers of Jesus today can. both hunger and thirst
after righteousness, justice and be genuine peacemakers in the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict."

While this conflict is extremely complex, understanding the issues involved
touches on a person’s biblical interpretation, theology, politics,
interfaith relationships and method of sharing the Gospel. "What is at stake
over this issue is nothing less than our understanding of God, our witness
to the Gospel and the credibility of the Christian Church," said Chapman.
"The stakes are very high."

Bakke told attendees about a conversation he had with a Jewish rabbi
concerning the current existence of modern Israel. "Every people, to be a
whole people, must somewhere in their history be stewards of power. We Jews
have always been victims of power. The state of Israel is our first
opportunity to be stewards of power," said the rabbi. Then with a tear
rolling down his cheek, he finished, saying, "If God is just, he will have
to remove us one more time for what we have done to the Palestinians in this
land. We are treating them the way the Nazis treated us."

Antoine Haddad, vice president of Lebanon’s InterVarsity Fellowship, said
that America has had a blind support for Israel, ignoring injustices the
Palestinians have faced. He said that this "created seeds for instability in
the Middle East region and led to wars and civil wars, dictatorships,
poverty, oppressive regimes – all of which have been negatively reflected on
the Christian presence in (the Middle East)."

And while the western Church’s response has been poor, Haddad says the
Church in the midst of the conflict has also reacted incorrectly: "The
response of Christians has been emigration, forsaking the cradle of
Christianity and forsaking their roots."

In Iraq, Archbishop Mar Avak Asadorian of the Armenian Orthodox Church in
Baghdad, is seeing a similar exodus in persecuted Christians.

"If the present state of affairs continue in the region of the Middle East
and Iraq, then the Eastern manifestation of the Christian Church – the
churches that saw the birth of the Lord and worshiped him in his own tongue,
giving millions of martyrs throughout 2,000 years – yes, these churches, are
already at peril," Asadorian said. "(This is) a matter not to be taken
lightly, otherwise we are going to lose the Eastern manifestation of the
Christian Church."

Although troubles facing the Middle East Church are plentiful, the stories
of faith and perseverance were equally abundant. "I had no idea that every
time I’d sit down I’d be sitting down next to a person who had the most
incredible story ever, and when I’d think I’d come to the most interesting
story I’d meet somebody else that would surpass that," said Cindi Steele,
who works with Orthodox Jews in Arizona through Make A Difference
Ministries. "I have enjoyed every moment of it."

Steele attended the conference with her husband and says she is thinking of
eventually bringing a club basketball team back to the Middle East to work
among the Palestinian people.

Speakers asked Christians everywhere to work to understand the religions and
politics of the Middle East in order to have a positive influence, to look
for ways to partner or offer aid to the Middle Eastern church, and most of
all, to pray for those who are hurting in the Middle East.

Lynne Hybels of Willow Creek Community Church just outside Chicago said that
she knows there must be some action after this dialog. She compared the
Sounds of Hope conference to her experience of going to Africa five years
ago to learn about AIDS. She left Africa asking the question: "How have I
ignored this situation? Why didn’t I ever let what I knew in my head travel
down to the level of my heart?"

She continued, "And now I’m going home with that same question that I left
Africa with: What’s happened this week is that I’ve seen the pain. I’ve
heard the anger. I think Christians in the Church in the West have shown a
lack of concern. By supporting global policies that have very much hurt the
Middle East as a whole we have betrayed our Christian brothers and sisters
here. What am I to do? That’s a prayer that I know God will answer, but not
easily; but I go home with that prayer."

The Jordan conference was the second Sounds of Hope event, the first being
held at Wheaton College at the Billy Graham Center in Illinois in 2006.

For more information, contact Sam Townsend or Leonard Rodgers, Executive
Director of EMEU.

http://www.emeu.net/article.php?item=49&amp

Ramkavar Party Records And Proposes

RAMKAVAR PARTY RECORDS AND PROPOSES

Lragir.am
15:19:48 – 28/10/2008

The leader of the Ramkavar Party of Armenia Harutiun Arakelyan stated
October 28 at the Hayatsk press club that Armenia must resign from the
framework of the OSCE Minsk Group framework and apply to the Court
of the Hague, where Arakelyan and the Liberal Democratic Ramkavar
Party of Armenia think by bringing together the potential of the
Armenians worldwide it will be possible to prove that Azerbaijan
attacked Karabakh whose resource was weaker several times, used mass
destruction weapon shelling the towns and villages of Karabakh and
also of Armenia, therefore Azerbaijan is an aggressor, not Armenia.

The impression from the activities of the OSCE Minsk Group pushed
Harutiun Arakelyan to make that statement. The leader of the
Ramkavar Party said the mediators pursue only their interests
and please Azerbaijan by non-pro-Armenian and actually insulting
statements. Harutiun Arakelyan also thinks that the Armenian press
reports about the agreement of the government to return the territories
are circulated from the outside and aim to measure the public moods
and crash morale. Harutiun Arakelyan says he cannot imagine that a
country would send troops to defend Armenia in case Azerbaijan attacks.

In this connection the reporters asked Harutiun Arakelyan why he
considers the media reports as an attempt to crash morale but not
the government’s statements on readiness to return territories. It
turns out that Arakelyan does not know what those statements of the
government mean. Besides, he thinks that the government is temporizing
through those statements until Armenia becomes strong economically.

In answer to the question of reporters what Armenia can do if the
Minsk Group and Azerbaijan refuse to go to the Hague, Harutiun
Arakelyan says Armenia must have it as a reserve option. According
to him, the point is that Azerbaijan has been threatening to report
the issue to other organizations for years on, whereas we are afraid
of doing that. According to him, if Azerbaijan reports the issue
to the UN with the help of the oil dollars and the Islamic world,
Armenia should set forward the option of the Court of the Hague.

Abel Aghanbegian: Geopolitical Perspectives Of Constructing Armenia-

ABEL AGHANBEGIAN: GEOPOLITICAL PERSPECTIVES OF CONSTRUCTING ARMENIA-IRAN RAILWAY SHOULD BE ASSESSED AS WELL

Noyan Tapan
Oct 24, 2008

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 24, NOYAN TAPAN. The main goal of constructing
an Armenia-Iran railway is to ensure transportation of goods, Abel
Aghanbegian, economist, Academician of the RF Academy of Sciences
said at the round table "The Economies of Armenia and Russia Today
and Tomorrow" organized by A. Aghanbegian Higher School of Corporate
Management under the patronage of the RA National Academy of Sciences.

According to him, the volume of goods transportation by vehicles
in this direction is small, so instead of building a railway, the
Armenia-Iran motorway should be improved by constructing several
tunnels and reducing the motorway’s length, as well as updating
vehicles. A. Aghanbekian noted that quite a large amount (1-2 billion
dollars) is needed to build an Iran-Armenia railway as its construction
is related to considerable difficulties.

However, in his opinion, it is not ruled out that for example,
Russia will make investments in this project if it considers the
Armenia-Iran railway to be important from the strategic point of
view. A. Aghanbegian mentioned that there were many cases in Russia
when transport routes were constructed for strategic reasons and
their operation finally covered their expenses – sometimes several
decades later.

He said that Iran is a huge country with great potential. It has twice
as much oil reserves as Russia, while by its gas reserves Iran is in
second place in the world after Russia. So A. Aghanbegian pointed
out the necessity to assess also the geopolitical perspectives of
constructing a railway, saying that it is possible that a railway
should be built from this point of view.

French Ex-Premier: Turkey Should Acknowledge Armenian Genocide

FRENCH EX-PREMIER: TURKEY SHOULD ACKNOWLEDGE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

PanARMENIAN.Net
25.10.2008 14:03 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ A fervent supporter of Turkey’s accession to the
European Union, former French Prime Minister, Michel Rocard, declared
that Europe needs Turkey and the ex-soviet republics, in particular
for energy reasons, independent French journalist Jean Eckian told
PanARMENIAN.Net.

He however indicated that "Turkey should settle the Cyprus issue and
recognize the Armenian Genocide". "Turkey knows this," he said.

"France also had difficulties with condemnation of the Vichy regime,"
he remarked.

Vichy France, or the Vichy regime are the common terms used to
describe the government of France from July 1940 to August 1944. This
government, which succeeded the Third Republic, officially called
itself the French State, in contrast with the previous designation,
"French Republic." Marshal Philippe Petain proclaimed the government
following the military defeat of France by Nazi Germany during World
War II and the vote by the National Assembly on July 10, 1940.

Vichy France had legal authority in both the northern zone of France,
which was occupied by the German Wehrmacht, and the unoccupied southern
"free zone", where the regime’s administrative center of Vichy
was located. The southern zone remained under Vichy control until
the Allies landed in French North Africa in November 1942. Recent
research by the historian Simon Kitson has shown that, in spite of
extensive state collaboration, Vichy led an ultimately unsuccessful
campaign to preserve the sovereignty of this southern zone by arresting
German spies.

Petain and the Vichy regime willfully collaborated with the German
occupation to a high degree. The French police and the state Milice
(militia) organized raids to capture Jews and others considered
"undesirables" by the Germans in both the northern and southern zones.

The legitimacy of Vichy France and Petain’s leadership was challenged
by General Charles de Gaulle, who claimed to instead represent the
legitimacy and continuity of the French government.