Advisor Of EU Special Representative: Contact With NKR Representativ

ADVISOR OF EU SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE: CONTACT WITH NKR REPRESENTATIVES IS VERY IMPORTANT FOR KARABAKH CONFLICT SETTLEMENT

ArmInfo
2007-06-18 09:07:00

During meetings with NKR political and non-governmental circles,
political advisor of EU Special Representative in South Caucasus
Mark Fawcett said that contact with NKR representatives is very
important for the conflict settlement, ArmInfo special correspondent
in Stepanakert reports.

"The European Union is involved in the programmes, carried in the
South Caucasian republics, to the definite degree. In particular,
it concerns establishment of neighbourliness. We would like to see
the contacts with the ordinary people, which contribute to revision of
values", M. Fawcett said and added that there are no contacts between
the parties to the Karabakh conflict. Another advisor of EU Special
Representative in South Caucasus Kaupo Kand introduced the programmes,
being carried out by EU in Abkhazia and South Osetia, which, according
to him, are mainly purposed to support the non-governmental sector,
recover the infrastructures, establish different kinds of contacts,
eliminate the isolation, etc. "We consider similar programmes may be
implemented in the NKR, in particular, fulfillment of measures for
consolidation of trust between the parties, implementation of economic
projects. It is not ruled out that time will come when the European
Union will join the conflict settlement process", K. Kand said.

To recall, during the visit to Stepanakert, advisor of EU Special
Representative in South Caucasus Mark Fawcett and Kaupo Kand met NKR
President Arkady Ghoukassyan, representatives of political forces
and the non-governmental sector of NKR.

Diaspora Is Interested In Resettlement Of These Territories

DIASPORA IS INTERESTED IN RESETTLEMENT OF THESE TERRITORIES

Lragir.am
KarabakhOpen
18-06-2007 11:46:21

We solved the problem by military actions, but we had to go on to
settle these territories, said Vahram Gevorgyan, chair of the Promised
Land NGO set up in 2000. Because it was not done, the territories
became an object of trade, and now their return has become an issue.

The organization implements projects for the settlement of the
liberated territories from 2001.

"We have just realized that these territories must be settled. If we
had managed to launch settlement with assistance from the Armenians
worldwide, the issue of territories would not be under negotiation,
and Azerbaijan would not claim to these territories."

The leadership and the political forces, which are now speaking
about the necessity of settlement of these territories, either have
finally realized its necessity or are making statements for the sake
of statements, Vahram Gevorgyan said.

He thinks first the strategic regions should be settled, which the
government failed to do. Vahram Gevorgyan is sure that the Diaspora
is interested in the settlement of these territories. "We just need
a corresponding government policy, and our foreign sponsors will be
ready to back this policy."

"Unfortunately, resettlement today is perceived as building houses,
meanwhile, it is part of a national strategy, which requires focus
and substantial efforts," Vahram Gevorgyan said.

Is the unrecognized state an obstacle to investments from the
Diaspora? In answer to this question, Vahram Gevorgyan said although
it caused to cancel one of the projects, it cannot be an obstacle.

Heritage Nominates Hovannisian For 15th District

PRESS RELEASE
The Heritage Party
31 Moscovian Street
Yerevan, Armenia
Tel.: (+374 – 10) 53.69.13
Fax: (+374 – 10) 53.26.97
Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Website:

June 18, 2007

HERITAGE NOMINATES HOVANNISIAN FOR 15TH DISTRICT

Talin, Armenia–On Sunday, June 17, Heritage party representatives
Tigran Sargsian and Mamikon Sargsian presented the Heritage Party’s
official nomination of Raffi Hovannisian for the parliamentary seat
from the 15th electoral district. The election, to be held on the
majoritarian (first-past-the-post) basis, will take place on August 26
because the initial poll of May 12 was conducted amid allegations of
massive fraud and the declared winner refused to pick up his National
Assembly mandate from the Central Election Commission. At present
there are 11 nominated candidates for the vacancy.

The 15th constituency includes the city of Talin and parts of the
regions of Aragatsotn and Armavir, from the slopes of Mt. Aragats to
the banks of the Arax River. "One by one, step by step, we intend to
bring back the first-place votes that were ‘lifted’ from us on May
12," Heritage spokesman Hovsep Khurshudian said.

Founded in 2002, Heritage has regional divisions throughout the land.
Its central office is located at 31 Moscovian Street, Yerevan 0002,
Armenia, with telephone contact at (374-10) 536.913, fax at (374-10)
532.697, email at [email protected] or [email protected], and website
at

www.heritage.am
www.heritage.am

Richard Giragossian Mentions Four Names

RICHARD GIRAGOSSIAN MENTIONS FOUR NAMES

Lragir.am
13-06-2007 17:13:44

Richard Giragossian, a Washington-based Armenian analyst, repeated
on June 13 at the Friday Club his opinion that Armenia is exposed to
the internal threat, namely corruption and uneffective governance. He
said he views the parliamentary election neutrally, as someone from
the Diaspora. Saying that he is perhaps the only person in Armenia
who mentions names, Richard Giragossian enumerated three figures,
who are able to bring about change.

"I see three people who are highly important. The first is Davit
Harutiunyan. The new National Assembly is a new stage for Davit
Harutiunyan.

As minister of justice he carried out reforms, amendments to the
Constitution. Now as a lawmaker he gets an excellent opportunity to
make much more important, much smarter steps. For me, this new National
Assembly is different. Generally, not in terms of individuals. It
is more important from the point of view of institutional democracy
rather than individual democracy. I want such a body, I mean a body
not a person. A parliament rather than some Sahakashvili. The second
is Arthur Aghabekyan. General Aghabekyan, I am happy these two are
chairs of standing committees because especially General Aghabekyan
as a real reformer in this National Assembly will be able to make
more powerful moves with the military budget in terms of NATO and the
Collective Security Pact. And the last name, a new name, since for
me not only the name is important but also its being a new name and
what it implies. This person is Nerses Yeritsyan, the new minister
of trade and economic development. It was a surprise for me, but as
a professional, as new generation, I say bravo, because Yeritsyan
is bound for future, because in order to develop Armenia needs such
a new generation, with a clear reputation, and professional, more
importantly, in the economy, because for the future of Armenia the
economic power is more important than the army and soldiers," says
Richard Giragossian.

The second essential thing for the future is democracy but
institutional democracy. The political scientist says he views the
parliament as a whole, not the victory, strengthening or weakening
of one force or another. Richard Giragossian particularly refers
to the change, progress in the thinking of the Armenian businessmen
as compared to Georgia and Azerbaijan. In this connection, Richard
Giragossian points to Khachatur Sukiasyan. He congratulated him on his
recent statements on promotion of reforms, effective efforts against
corruption and monopolies. Richard Giragossian endorsed this change,
especially that there is more stability than elsewhere, he said.

Open Letter From Italian Foreign Minister Massimo D’Alema: "Italy, T

OPEN LETTER FROM ITALIAN FOREIGN MINISTER MASSIMO D’ALEMA: "ITALY, TURKEY’S CRITICAL ALLY IN EUROPE"

Il Sole 24 Ore, Italy
June 13 2007

Dear Editor,

In my institutional and political talks in Ankara, I have brought a
message of strong support from Italy at a highly sensitive time for
the country. Turkey has been going through a very sensitive time on
both the domestic and international levels over the past few months.

The force of attraction that Europe has exercised since the start of
membership negotiations in October 2005 has unquestionably had a very
positive impact on the political situation in the country.

The widespread difficulties that we now see in Brussels are in danger
of causing fault lines to re-emerge in Turkish society over complex
issues of political ethics and of national identity, and of strongly
undermining the support for the European project that the country’s
political, social, and economic forces have shared to date.

That is another reason why Italy continues to back Turkey’s journey
towards membership of the European Union, above and beyond any
current circumstances. We are prompted to do so, among other reasons,
by geostrategic reasons linked to our common Mediterranean location,
which is capable of imparting better balance to the Union’s internal
component parts. Also, Turkey represents a pivot between the Balkans,
the Middle East, the Caucasus, and central Asia, and it is a hub
for energy transit from the Black Sea to the Caspian. But above all,
I am convinced that membership on the part of a country engaged in
reconciling Islam and secular nonconfessionalism, development and
stability, and modernity and tradition, can serve at one and the same
time as an encouragement to the reformist forces in other countries in
the area, and a challenge for Europe to prove that it is not closing
in on itself.

One of the most complex, and in many ways crucial, matches for Europe
is being played out over the prospect of European membership for
Turkey: namely, whether the Union should define itself in terms
of an "exclusive" identity, or whether it should not, rather,
be characterized as an open – albeit demanding and consistent –
political project based on a sharing of values. The process of
Turkey’s rapprochement with the European Union has set out on a
solid track, but the convoy’s advancement, its speed, and its regular
progress depend a great deal on those driving it today and on those
who will be driving it in years to come. People in Turkey are aware
that membership of the Union does not mean membership of an alliance
with a vaguely defined outline, but that it involves a full fledged
power of "transformation." Europe does not "export" democracy, with
all the attendant risks and unknowns involved; it tends, rather,
to generate or, if you prefer, to consolidate the local democratic
tendency in those countries that join or aspire to join the Union.

Turkey’s membership process will have to be assessed on the basis of
specific issues which are still open or unresolved (full freedom of
expression and of worship; solutions, as yet unforthcoming, regarding
relations with Cyprus; the "Kurdish question"; and relations with
Armenia); it must not decided or influenced by considerations based on
abstract identity-related or generically "cultural" criteria. A common
idea and project joins some very different countries together in a
solid bond today – countries such as Greece and Sweden, or Portugal
and Denmark – without anyone invoking cultural homogeneity.

What matters is what we want to do and become together.

It is likewise important to have efficient institutions designed to
make it possible to debate and to assess together, but to then reach
a decision. Europe needs a "deliberative democracy." That is why
institutional reform is so crucial to Europe’s very credibility. Yet
firmly backing the prospect of EU membership for Turkey does not mean
that we underestimate the membership negotiations’ complexity. Quite
apart from the political aspects, the country’s very demographic and
economic size will necessitate the search for new, delicate balances
in Community policies, from the Common Agriculture Policy to policies
for cohesion. But then, the European Union’s future depends also on
its ability to resolve these difficult problems.

For our part, we have imparted a fresh boost to our "strategy of
attention" towards Turkey, setting up a "Turkey table" comprising
members of the institutions and representatives of the worlds of
business and of finance. Italy is Turkey’s third most important trading
partner, with trade figures constantly on the rise (over 15 billion
[currency not specified] in 2006) and with over 500 firms operating
in the country.

We are determined to consolidate our presence not only in the major
areas of industry and excellence such as transportation, energy,
helicopters, and construction, but also in the fields of banking and
of small and medium businesses. Technological innovation, finance,
and trade are solidly rooted in a country with a very high growth rate
(around 6 to 7 per cent) and with immense potential for expansion.

In this complex, multilateral and bilateral, path, it is our ambition
to act as a careful and aware interlocutor for Turkey, but also as
a partner capable of using the credibility that it has acquired to
keep alive a dialogue that is assiduous, vigilant, and if necessary,
even critical, in order to support the country on its journey towards
complete European integration.

BAKU: No Breakthrough In St. Petersburg Meeting Of Azerbaijani And A

NO BREAKTHROUGH IN ST. PETERSBURG MEETING OF AZERBAIJANI AND ARMENIAN PRESIDENTS – AZERBAIJANI FOREIGN MINISTER

Trend News Agency, Azerbaijan
June 11 2007

Elmar Mammadyarov, the Azerbaijani Foreign Minister, stated in
St. Petersburg, Russia, that no breakthrough was achieved in the peace
talks on the resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict meeting
between the Presidents of Azerbaijan and Armenia, Ilham Aliyev and
Robert Kocharian. The two Presidents discussed issues concerning the
major principles of the conflict settlement, Maxmedia news agency
reports.

In talks with journalists in St. Petersburg on the 10th of June Bartan
Oskanian , the Armenian Foreign Minister, stressed that the head of
states were proposed to discuss the issues which the OSCE Minsk Group
co-chairs had hoped them to achieve. At the same time the Armenian
Minister noted they had serious and deep discussions.

Oskanian stated with regret, that no progress was achieved during the
meeting of the Presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan in St. Petersburg,
and there are still disagreements.

"Earlier, the Presidents informed mediators on the essence of talks,"
he clarified.

Oskanian said that the process will continue on the level of foreign
ministers. At the same time he found it difficult to predict another
meeting between Aliyev and Kocharian.

A meeting between the Presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan in
St. Petersburg on the 9th of June lasted three hours.

Karabakh-Telecom carries out a number of charity programs in NK

Karabakh-Telecom carries out a number of charity programs in
Nagorno-Karabakh

Arminfo
2007-06-11 13:04:00

The executive director of the main telecoms operator of
Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, Karabakh-Telecom, Ralph Yirikian is known
for his large-scale charitable activities in NKR.

ArmInfo’s own correspondent in Stepanakert reports that presently
Yirikian is sponsoring the construction of children’s playgrounds in
different regions of the republic. Recently such a facility was opened
in Shushi. The head of the Shushi district administration Vladimir
Kasyan pointed out that Yirikian has made a great contribution to the
restoration and development of Shushi. Yirikian said that he loves
Shushi and gives it special attention.

Martakert, Kashatag and Askeran already have children’s playgrounds.
Similar programs are planned in Martuni, Hadrut and Karvachar. Yirikian
also supports the construction of Holy Virgin Church in Stepanakert.

RA Presidnet Received The Minsk Group Co-Chairs

RA PRESIDNET RECEIVED THE MINSK GROUP CO-CHAIRS

ArmRadio.am
08.06.2007 10:36

RA President Robert Kocharyan received the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs
Matthew Bryza, Bernard Fassier and Yuri Merzlyakov and the Personal
Representative of the OSCE Chairman-in-Office Andrzej Kasprzyk.

Issues related to the negotiation process on Nagorno Karabakh conflict
settlement were discussed in the context of the forthcoming meeting
of the Presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan in Saint Petersburg.

Soccer: Armenia 1-0 Poland

ARMENIA 1-0 POLAND

RTE.ie, Ireland
June 6 2007

Poland missed the chance to extend their lead at the top of Euro
2008 Qualifying Group A after slipping to a one-goal defeat against
a battling Armenia side at the Republican Stadium.

Armenia, who had rarely threatened in the opening hour, broke the
deadlock in the 64th minute after Poland defender Jacek Bak fouled
Armenia’s Aram Hakobyan on the edge of the penalty area.

Experienced midfielder Hamlet Mkhitaryan took the resulting free-kick
and his right-footed shot flew past Poland goalkeeper Artur Boruc
into the top-left corner of the net.

Armenia manager Ian Porterfield though had Gevorg Kasparov to thank
for the victory after the Pas Tehran goalkeeper denied Poland on a
number of occasions.

The visitors had three chances within the space of five minutes to
open the scoring in the first half but were unable to find a way past
the inspired 26-year-old goalkeeper.

Defender Marcin Wasilewski found striker Marek Saganowski in the 26th
minute but his shot from inside the six-yard box was tipped round
the post by Kasparov.

A minute later Kasparov was brought into action again after Mkhitaryan
fouled Poland midfielder Wojciech Lobodzinski just outside the
penalty area.

Midfielder Jacek Krzynowek took the resulting free-kick but his
curling effort was pushed over the bar by Kasparov.

Kasparov again denied Poland’s attack in the 29th minute, this
time saving Lobodzinski 25-yard drive with his feet before blocking
Saganowski’s follow-up shot from 12 yards.

Poland continued to dominate possession in the second half but found
the Armenia defence much more difficult to break down and Kasparov
in inspired form.

Kasparov again denied Leo Beenhakker’s side late in the game, first
making a smart save from midfielder Jakub Blaszczykowski’s header in
the 86th minute then blocking striker Maciej Zurawski’s shot from 12
yards in injury time.

Grand Prix Of Gift 2007 Went To Isphahan

GRAND PRIX OF GIFT 2007 WENT TO ISPHAHAN

KarabakhOpen
07-06-2007 17:51:31

The Gift 2007 Armenian song contest and festival ended. Pareli
Amirjanyan from Isphahan got the grand-prix. The Armina, a trio from
Yerevan, took the first prize. Macbeth Gasparyan from Artashet got the
second prize, and the Elite band and Anahit Shahbazyan from Yerevan
shared the third prize.

Hrach Keshishyan, judge of the contest, said in an interview with the
KarabakhOpen they argued for a long time over giving the grand-prix
to Armina or Pareli Amirjanyan. "In our judgment, a band is a better-
established structure, and we decided to award the grand-prix to
Pareli," Hrach Keshishyan said.

This year there were 16 judges, mostly representatives of the Armenian
show business.