Armenia: Ancient Past to Aggrieved Present

The Patriot Post
Dec 28 2020

By William Federer · Dec. 28, 2020


According to ancient tradition, Noah’s Ark rested on Mount Ararat in the Armenian Mountain Range.

Noah’s Ark on Mount Ararat is even featured on Armenia’s National Coat of Arms.

Armenian historian Movses Khorenatsi (410-490 AD) recounted the tradition that Noah’s son Japheth had a descendant named Hayk who shot an arrow in a battle near Lake Van c.2,500 BC killing Nimrod, builder of the Tower of Babel — the first tyrant of the ancient world.

Hayk is the origin of “Hayastan,” the Armenian name for Armenia.

Ancient Armenians may have had some relations with the Hittites and Hurrians, who inhabited that area known as Anatolia in the 2nd millenium BC.

Armenia’s major city of Yerevan, founded in 782 BC in the shadow of Mount Ararat, is one of the oldest continuously inhabited cities in the world.

Armenia was mentioned in the Book of Isaiah (37:38), when King Sennacherib of Assyria invaded Judah around 701 BC.

King Hezekiah and the Prophet Isaiah prayed and Judah was miraculously saved. Sennacherib returned to Assyria:

“And it came to pass, as Sennacherib was worshiping in the house of Nisroch his god, that Adrammelech and Sharezer his sons smote him with the sword; and they escaped into the land of Armenia.”

Armenia was first mentioned by name in secular records in 520 BC by Darius the Great of Persia in his Behistun inscription, as being one of the countries he sent troops into to put down a revolt.

In 331 BC, Alexander the Great conquered Persia, but never conquered Armenia.

King Tigrane the Great, 95-55 BC, extended Armenia’s borders to their greatest extent, stretching from the Caspian Sea to the Mediterranean Sea, pushing back the Parthians, Seleucids and the Roman Republic.

In 66 BC, Roman General Pompey invaded Armenia during the Mithridatic Wars, but King Tigrane paid him to leave.

Pompey then marched into Judea and captured Jerusalem, but forbade his soldiers from damaging the Temple.

In the 3rd century AD, Roman Emperor Diocletian betrayed Armenian King Tiridates III and captured large areas of Armenia.

In this crisis, King Tiridates released Saint Gregory the Illuminator, whom he had imprisoned for 12 years for being the son of his father’s killer.

Gregory preached to King Tiridates, then baptized him in 301 AD.

St. Gregory the Illuminator is credited with turning Armenia from paganism to Christianity.

Though other countries at that time had majority Christian populations, such as Syria, Cappadocia, and Egypt, Armenia was the first nation to “officially” adopt Christianity as its state religion when King Tiridates III converted in 301 AD.

A section of the Old City of Jerusalem is known as “The Armenian Quarter.”

In 313 AD, Constantine the Great ended the persecution of Christians throughout the Roman Empire.

Not long after Armenia, another kingdom became Christian.

King Ezana of the African Kingdom of Aksum (320-360 AD) converted to Christianity and adopted it as the official religion of his kingdom, which included:

# Ethiopia, also called Abyssinia;
# Yemen;
# southern Arabia;
# northern Somalia;
# Djibouti;
# Eritrea, and
# parts of Sudan.

Aksum’s King Ezana originally minted coins with a pagan symbol at the top of a star and crescent moon.

After he converted to Christianity, he replaced the star and crescent with a Christian cross, though pagans in the Middle East continued using the star and crescent symbol for centuries.

Armenia’s thousands of years of history included independence, interspersed with occupations by:

# Assyrians,
# Medes,
# Achaemenid Persians,
# Greeks,
# Parthians,
# Romans,
# Sasanian Persians,
# Byzantines,
# Arabs,
# Seljuk Turks,
# Mongols,
# Ottoman Turks,
# Russians,
# Safavid Persians,
# Afsharid Persians,
# Qajar Persians, and again
# Russians.

Armenia’s medieval capitol of Ani was called “the city of a 1,001 churches,” with a population of 200,000, rivaling the populations of the cities of the largest cities of the era, such as: Constantinople, Baghdad, Damascus, Florence, Rome, Paris, London, and Milan.

Islam emerged in the 7th century and quickly conquered throughout north Africa, Egypt and the Middle East.

In 704 AD, Caliph Walid tricked Armenian nobles to meet in St. Gregory’s Church in Naxcawan and Church of Xram on the Araxis River.

Once they were all inside, he broke his promise, a practice called “taqiya.” He had his soldiers surround the church, set it on fire, and burn everyone inside to death.

In 1064, Muslim Sultan Alp Arslan and his Seljuk Turkish army invaded Armenia and after a 25 day siege, destroyed the city of Ani.

Arab historian Sibt ibn al-Jawzi recorded:

“The city became filled from one end to the other with bodies of the slain … The army entered the city, massacred its inhabitants, pillaged and burned it, leaving it in ruins …

Dead bodies were so many that they blocked the streets; one could not go anywhere without stepping over them. And the number of prisoners was not less than 50,000 souls …

I was determined to enter city and see the destruction with my own eyes. I tried to find a street in which I would not have to walk over the corpses; but that was impossible.”

Ottoman Turks reduced conquered Christians, Jewish, and non-Muslim populations to a second-class status called “dhimmi,” and required them to annually ransom their lives by paying an exorbitant tax called “jizyah.”

Sultan Murat I (1359-1389) began the practice of “devshirme” — taking away boys from the conquered Armenian and Greek families.

These innocent boys were systematically traumatized and indoctrinated into becoming ferocious Muslim warriors called “Janissaries,” similar to Egypt’s “Mamluk” slave soldiers.

Janissaries were required to call the Sultan their “father” and were forbidden to marry, giving rise to depraved practices and abhorrent pederasty — “the sodomy of the Turks.”

For centuries Ottoman Turks conquered throughout the Mediterranean, Middle East, Eastern Europe, Spain and North Africa, carrying tens of thousands into slavery.

Beginning in the early 1800s, the Ottoman Empire began to decline.

Greece, Serbia, Bulgaria and Romania won their independence.

When Armenia’s sentiments leaned toward independence, Sultan Abdul Hamid II put an end to it by massacring 100,000 from 1894-1896.

President Grover Cleveland reported to Congress, December 2, 1895:

“Occurrences in Turkey have continued to excite concern … Massacres of Christians in Armenia and the development … of a spirit of fanatic hostility to Christian influences … have lately shocked civilization.”

The next year, President Cleveland addressed Congress, December 7, 1896:

“Disturbed condition in Asiatic Turkey … rage of mad bigotry and cruel fanaticism … wanton destruction of homes and the bloody butchery of men, women, and children, made martyrs to their profession of Christian faith …

Outbreaks of blind fury which lead to murder and pillage in Turkey occur suddenly and without notice …

It seems hardly possible that the earnest demand of good people throughout the Christian world for its corrective treatment will remain unanswered.”

President William McKinley told Congress, December 5, 1898:

“The … envoy of the United States to … Turkey … is … charged to press for a just settlement of our claims … of the destruction of the property of American missionaries resident in that country during the Armenian troubles of 1895.”

On December 6, 1904, President Theodore Roosevelt reported to Congress of:

“… systematic and long-extended cruelty and oppression … of which the Armenians have been the victims, and which have won for them the indignant pity of the civilized world.”

Sultan Abdul Hamid II made a league with Kaiser Wilhelm of Germany, trading guns for access to oil.

When Sultan Hamid was deposed in 1908, there was a brief euphoria among the citizens of Turkey, as they naively hoped the country would adopt a constitutional government guaranteeing individual rights and freedoms.

Instead, the government was taken over by the “Young Turks” — three leaders or “pashas”:

# Mehmed Talaat Pasha,
# Ismail Enver Pasha, and
# Ahmed Djemal Pasha.

They acted as if they were planning democratic reforms while they clandestinely planned a genocidal scheme called “Ottomanization,” ridding the country of all who were not Muslims Turks.

The first step involved recruiting unsuspecting Armenian young men into the military.

Next they made them “non-combatant” soldiers and took away their weapons.

Finally, they marched them into the woods and deserts where they were ambushed and massacred.

With the Armenian young men gone, Armenian cities and villages were defenseless.

Nearly 2 million old men, women and children were marched into the desert, thrown off cliffs or burned alive.

Armenian cities of Kharpert, Van and Ani was leveled.

Entire Armenian populations were deported to the deserts of Syria and Mesopotamia where hundreds of thousands were killed or starved to death.

Similar atrocities have recently been experienced in the Middle East by populations of:

# Iraqi Chaldean Christians,
# Assyrian Christians,
# Syriac Christians,
# Lebanese Maronite Christians,
# Egyptian Coptic Christians,
# Aramaic Christians,
# Melkite Christians, and
# Kurds.

Concern is also growing over implementation of a fundamentalist agenda by recent leaders in Turkey.

During World War I, Armenia briefly received aid from Russia until that country’s military was decimated by German artillery, followed by Tsar Nicholas II being killed during Vladimir Lenin’s Bolshevik revolution.

Theodore Roosevelt recorded the fate of Armenians in his 1916 book Fear God and Take Your Own Part:

“Armenians, who for some centuries have sedulously avoided militarism and war … are so suffering precisely and exactly because they have been pacifists whereas their neighbors, the Turks, have … been … militarists …

During the last year and a half … Armenians have been subjected to wrongs far greater than any that have been committed since the close of the Napoleonic Wars … Fearful atrocities …

Serbia is at this moment passing under the harrow of torture and mortal anguish …”

Roosevelt continued:

“Armenians have been butchered under circumstances of murder and torture and rape that would have appealed to an old-time Apache Indian …

The wholesale slaughter of the Armenians … must be shared by the neutral powers headed by the United States for their failure to protest when this initial wrong was committed …

The crowning outrage has been committed by the Turks on the Armenians.

They have suffered atrocities so hideous that it is difficult to name them, atrocities such as those inflicted upon conquered nations by the followers of Attila and of Genghis Khan.

It is dreadful to think that these things can be done and that this nation nevertheless remarks ‘neutral not only in deed but in thought,’ between right and the most hideous wrong, neutral between despairing and hunted people — people whose little children are murdered and their women raped — and the victorious and evil wrong-doers …

I trust that all Americans worthy of the name feel their deepest indignation and keenest sympathy aroused by the dreadful Armenian atrocities.

I trust that they feel … that a peace obtained without … righting the wrongs of the Armenians would be worse than any war.”

Historian Arnold Toynbee wrote:

“The Turks draft the criminals from their prisons into the Gendarmeri (military police) to exterminate the Armenian race …

In 1913 the Turkish Army was engaged in exterminating the Albanians … Greeks and Slavs left in the territory …

The same campaign of extermination has been waged against the Nestorian Christians on the Persian frontier … In Syria there is a reign of terror …”

Toynbee continued:

“Turkish rule … is … slaughtering or driving from their homes, the Christian population …

Only a third of the two million Armenians in Turkey have survived, and that at the price of apostatizing to Islam or else of leaving all they had and fleeing across the frontier.”

Armenia’s pleas at the Paris Peace Conference led Democrat President Wilson in a failed effort to make Armenia a U.S. protectorate.

Woodrow Wilson, who was born DECEMBER 28, 1856, addressed Congress, May 24, 1920:

“The Senate Committee on Foreign Relations has established the truth of the reported massacres and other atrocities from which the Armenian people have suffered …

deplorable conditions of insecurity, starvation, and misery now prevalent in Armenia …

Sympathy for Armenia among our people has sprung from untainted consciences, pure Christian faith and an earnest desire to see Christian people everywhere succored (helped) in their time of suffering.”

In 2006, Director Andrew Goldberg produced a documentary film The Armenian Genocide.

In 2016, actors Christian Bale, Oscar Isaac and Charlotte Le Bon starred in the film The Promise, depicting the Armenian genocide in the last days of the Ottoman Empire.

In some areas, entire Armenian populations were decimated.

Some heroic and caring Turks refused to carry out orders kill Armenians and were themselves punished, as represented in a scene in The Promise, where the character Emre Ogan (played by Marwan Kenzari) risked his life to rescue American journalist Chris Myers (played by Christian Bale.)

On August 29, 2014, the California Senate unanimously passed the Armenian Genocide Education Act mandating that among the human rights subjects covered in public schools, instruction shall be made of the genocide committed in Armenia at the beginning of the 20th century:

“The Legislature encourages the incorporation of survivor, rescuer, liberator, and witness oral testimony into the teaching of … the Armenian, Cambodian, Darfur, and Rwandan genocides … teaching about civil rights, human rights violations, genocide, slavery … the Holocaust … and … the Great Irish Famine of 1845–50 …

For purposes of this article, ‘Armenian Genocide’ means the torture, starvation, and murder of 1,500,000 Armenians, which included death marches into the Syrian desert, by the rulers of the Ottoman Turkish Empire and the exile of more than 500,000 innocent people during the period from 1915 to 1923, inclusive.”

Hitler allegedly gave orders August 22, 1939, to brutally invade Poland, adding:

“Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?”

Judge Learned Hand once wrote:

“The use of history is to tell us … past themes, else we should have to repeat, each in his own experience, the successes and the failures of our forebears.”

Harvard Professor George Santayana wrote in Reason in Common Sense (Vol. I of The Life of Reason, 1905):

“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

Armenia’s economic activity index declines 7.2% in 11 months

Save

Share

 13:32,

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 25, ARMENPRESS. Armenia’s economic activity index has declined 7.2% in January-November 2020 compared to January-November 2019, the National Statistical Committee reports.

Industrial production volume declined 0.2%. Construction volume declined 11.2%. The decline in trade turnover comprised 13.5%, and that in the services volume – 13.6%.

In January-November consumer price index increased 1%, the industrial production price index grew 2.2%. Electricity production volume increased 1.8% in the aforementioned period.

Average monthly nominal salary in Armenia increased 4.2%, comprising 186,167 drams.

External trade volumes have also registered decline – 12.4%: the export declined 5.2% and the import – 15.9%.

Dram exchange rate against the US dollar was 486.29 as of January-November 2020.

Reporting by Anna Grigoryan; Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

TURKISH press: OPINION – Albanian churches in Karabakh and endless Armenian lies

Telman Nusratoghlu   |23.12.2020
File Photo – A view of the city as Azerbaijani Army enter Agdam district in Nagorno-Karabakh following 27 years November 20, 2020. The ministry said in a statement that the Azerbaijani army entered the district as part of a cease-fire deal with Armenia that was brokered by Russia. ( Azerbaijan Ministry of Defence – Anadolu Agency )

BAKU, Azerbaijan

Schools, mosques, libraries, cultural centers and museums in the Fuzuli, Jabrayil, Aghdam, Zangilan, Gubadli and Kalbajar regions around Nagorno-Karabakh, which UN resolutions confirmed to be Azerbaijani territories, were occupied by Armenians 27 years ago, and all the human-inhabited places were wiped out by Armenian invaders with unprecedented vandalism as well.

Armenians have now initiated new global manipulation over the Alban Khudavang (Dadivang) Monastery, which Azerbaijani Turks have carefully protected as a part of their rich historical-cultural and humanity heritage since the ninth century.

It should first be noted that years before the fabrication of lies on this church complex, Azerbaijan’s Culture Ministry made important decisions to protect the monastery per the spirit of Azerbaijani and Turkish cultural traditions and historical continuity, and included Khudavang on a list of world monuments. However, the Kalbajar region, where the monastery is located, failed to be protected due to its occupation by Armenians.

Along with the liberation of Karabakh from the occupation, the sun of freedom shone on this monastery complex, which is considered to be one of the perfect architectural pearls of the period of Azerbaijani Albania, located on the Murovdagh plateau, and was returned to its rightful owner. Eventually, the Azerbaijani state gained the opportunity to turn those places from centers of the armed struggle of chauvinist Armenian religious committees into those of ethno-tourism and multicultural values open to all mankind.

However, the recent false campaign of the Armenian clergy, who have turned the Albanian churches into an arsenal, the falsification of the Christian history of the South Caucasus, and the fabrication of the history of Armenian humanity and Armenian Christianity, disguising themselves as “oppressed ancient nation,” allowed us to expose Armenian lies on a global scale.

We will touch on the history of Albanian monasteries in Karabakh, which the Armenians tried to appropriate for insidious intentions, but we must also focus on the cultural hostility and barbarism of our century taking place before the eyes of the whole world.

Reza Deghati, a photojournalist for famed National Geographic magazine who visited Aghdam with 200,000 inhabitants that were returned to Azerbaijan after the Tripartite Declaration 28 years later, was horrified by the scene he observed. He compared the city to Hiroshima, Japan, destroyed by an atomic bomb in 1945.

Foreign ambassadors accredited in Azerbaijan, representatives of international organizations, and military attachés visiting the city of Fuzuli liberated from occupation could not hide their amazement at the sight of the destroyed city. All those cities, libraries, and museums destroyed and looted by the invaders are in the lands of Azerbaijan.

The Armenian rulers also admitted that they had occupied those seven regions around Nagorno-Karabakh allegedly as part of security measures. During his visit to Aghdam, President Ilham Aliyev protested against all these acts of vandalism, saying that it was as if a savage tribe had passed through here.

Turning a blind eye to those who destroyed our cities and villages and turned mosques in Zangilan, Gubadli and Aghdam into animal shelters also moved forward in parallel with Armenian lies and fabrications, Russia and the West show a keen interest in seizing control of the Albanian (Aghvan) churches in Karabakh, the historical and cultural heritage of Azerbaijan, moreover, appeal to UNESCO for the protection of those monasteries, which are also important in terms of showing how far the policy of double standards reached in the world. However, in the name of protecting justice on earth and exposing the Armenian lies, we have to insist on raising world public awareness of the historical truth.

Everyone should know that Agoghlan Monastery in the Lachin region, Khudavang (Dadivang) complex in the Kalbajar region, the Holy Elysee temple complex in the Aghdara region, and the Ganjasar (Gandzasar) monastery therein are the historical heritage of Caucasian Albania, which is the first Christian state in the South Caucasus uniting more than 20 Turks and Caucasians under one flag, and which also plays an important role in the formation of the ethnogenesis of the Azerbaijani Turks.

Moisey Kalankatuklu’s primary source work on Aghvan history, which shed light on a 1,000-year statehood history of the Albanian state, appears to be one the leading sources of the rich historical literature that had been shaped since the fourth century BC. The Albanian (Aghvan) Czar Urnayir converted to Christianity in 313-314, at the same time as the Roman Empire. As indicated in the archival documents of Czarist Russia, the first churches and monasteries opened in Azerbaijani lands were apostolic churches, rather than sectarian as the Armenian Gregorian Church during the occupation.

The Ganjasar (Gandzasar) monastery, built by the Mehrani, who developed entirely on the historical and cultural tradition of Aghvan with its architectural style, church hierarchy, and ritual system, also served as a Christian center of the region for centuries. It is a historical fact admitted by Armenian historians that the Armenian Church, which moved from Cilicia to Echmiadzin in 1441 under the auspices of the Garagoyunlus, another Azerbaijani Turkic state, continued to operate under the religious influence of Ganjasar for a long time. Even in 1766, the Astrakhan diocese decided to submit to Ganjasar (Gandzasar).

However, as the importance of the Echmiadzin Church increased as a consequence of the policy of active use of the Armenian card in Anatolia and the Caucasus, again at the suggestion of an Armenian delegation in Tbilisi in 1836, a czarist decree abolished the Albanian Catholicosate, and the Albanian churches were subordinated to the Armenian Gregorian Church, which paved the way for Armenization games over those monasteries as well.

When Azerbaijan gained independence, the Albanian-Udin Christian community living in Gabala also began to operate vigorously as the heirs of the Albanian rich religious and cultural heritage. At present, several historical Albanian temples, such as the Holy Elysee and the Kish Temple, are subordinate to the community.

It should be noted that the triangular, semicircular crosses one can see there are completely unique to the Albanian churches.

Isn’t it a historical irony that Armenia and its patrons, who devastated the cities and villages with all their cultural monuments that existed 27 years ago, tried to give a cultural lesson to Azerbaijan, while the historical and cultural context regarding the Albanian churches in Karabagh is evident, and while in the Islamic era, within the framework of the great Turkish tolerance and the philosophy of “love that which was created for the Creator’s sake,” Turkic states such as the Seljuk, Aghgoyunlu, Garagoyunlu, Safavid, Ottoman and Afshar respectfully preserved all the churches and temples, including the Albanian churches there, up to now?

I wonder what a cunning plan Armenians are pursuing by showing the world images of Azerbaijanis reciting the azan in a church building constructed in 2017 in the occupied Jabrayil region, where not a single Armenian lived from the czarist regime to the Soviets. I felt the need to respond to France, which especially made an unfair hue and cry by relying on Armenian lies, citing the words of famous French historian Jean-Paul Roux.

He wrote in his book “History of the Turks, 2,000 years from the Pacific to the Mediterranean”: “The place of the Turks in human history is fundamental, it is impossible to write the history of humanity without giving them a large space, to neglect traces of their great culture from the Taj Mahal in Babur India to the Mostar Bridge in the Ottoman Balkans.”

*The writer is the director of the Turkish-Islamic Research Center and a lecturer at Khazar University.

* Opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Anadolu Agency.




Armenia records largest growth rate of industrial production in EAEU

Save

Share

 09:20, 16 December, 2020

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 16, ARMENPRESS. Industrial production growth in Armenia, according to the current prices and the average exchange rate of the Armenian dram against the US dollar calculated by the Central Bank, comprised 3 billion 355,3 million USD in January-October 2020, recording an increase of 0.5% compared to the same period of 2019, the Eurasian Economic Commission reports.

According to the EEC data, the total industrial production figure of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) in January-October 2020 has been 837 billion 433,8 million USD and recorded a decline of 2.8% compared to the same period of 2019.

Moreover, the industrial production volume of Belarus comprised 38 billion 601,5million USD according to the current prices and the exchange rate of the national currency against the US dollar: it registered a decline of 1.2% compared to January-October 2019.

The industrial production volume in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Russia in January-October 2020 comprised 52 billion 210,3 million USD (0.6% decline), 3 billion 480,1 million USD (3.6% decline) and 739 billion 786,6 million USD (3.1% decline) respectively.

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

‘Snap elections cannot be held only by my will and decision’, Armenian PM says

Save

Share

 17:00, 16 December, 2020

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 16, ARMENPRESS. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan says snap parliamentary elections cannot be held only by his will and decision, adding that consent should be reached over it.

In an interview to Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, asked whether for instance a change of the PM is really illogical in such situation, Pashinyan stated: “The question is not that the prime minister should leave or not, the question is that who decides who is the Prime Minister of Armenia. People should decide by their own choice, snap elections cannot be held only by my will and decision, consent should be reached over it”.

Commenting on the question relating to assuming responsibility, the PM said: “Ok. I say I consider myself the number one responsible official, but I do not consider myself as the number one guilty”.

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

Armenian ombudsman: Government must provide proper explanations to public

Public Radio of Armenia

Dec 17 2020

The anxiety and anger of residents of Kapan, Goris and other towns and border villages of Syunik Province of Armenia, including those related to the process of demarcation and delimitation of borders in the region, are justified, Human Rights Defender (Ombudsman) Arman Tatoyan said on Thursday.

“We are talking about the right to life and other fundamental rights of the residents of these settlements, their physical safety and security, the opportunities to ensure their livelihood and, finally, the security of Armenia’s state borders,” he wrote on Facebook.

“Along with specialists of my office, I paid a special working visit to Syunik and was convinced of the relevance of these issues. In addition, since early yesterday morning and today, the Office of the Human Rights Defender has been receiving alarming calls and concerns from residents of Syunik border communities over the same issues, and protest actions are being monitored.

“I emphasize that the government of Armenia (not the local authorities of Syunik), the supreme executive body of our country, must provide proper explanations to the public and especially residents of border settlements on issues and developments concerning them and our society as a whole.

“This is a right of citizens granted by the Constitution. The state has a direct obligation to ensure it, period!” the ombudsman said. 


The South Caucasus: New Realities After the Armenia-Azerbaijan War (Part Two)

Jamestown Foundation
Dec 17 2020

Azerbaijan’s successful military action against Armenia’s occupying forces in Karabakh this autumn disproved Western diplomacy’s admonitions about post-Soviet “frozen conflicts” having “no military solutions” but “only political, negotiated solutions” with “no alternatives.” Armenia, however, had imposed its own military solution, without negotiation, in 1994 (modeled on Russia’s military solutions elsewhere in former Soviet territories), whereupon Azerbaijan sought redress through negotiations for 26 years, without results. Western diplomacy’s admonitions purported to overlook the decisive role of military instruments in shaping political outcomes. For his part, President Ilham Aliyev emphasized in the wake of the armistice that Azerbaijan has achieved a “military-political solution,” namely a successful military campaign followed by a negotiated armistice on terms favorable to Baku (Azertag, November 10, 20, 24, 25).

With international law on its side, Azerbaijan had, throughout the 26-year negotiations (including 17 years with Ilham Aliyev’s personal involvement), explicitly reserved the right to use force, rather than accept the loss of its territories in perpetuity. The Armenian government of Nikol Pashinian made war inevitable by repudiating the negotiation process outright (see EDM, November 25, and below). That challenge found Azerbaijan well prepared in advance for this eventuality. It went to war within the limits of international law, conducting military operations exclusively on its own territory, and without answering in kind to the Armenian army’s shelling of Azerbaijani undefended towns.

Confronted, nevertheless, with disapproval by France and the United States as mediator countries and by other Western authorities, Aliyev responded, “Based on the right of self-defense under the United Nations Charter, we are liberating Azerbaijan’s internationally recognized territory from occupation” (Azertag, October 25). Far from an illustration of power politics prevailing over international law, it was force tempered by international law. Tempered, too, by political considerations, Azerbaijan’s forces deliberately refrained from entering Upper (“Nagorno”) Karabakh’s Armenian-populated core areas.

Azerbaijan’s complete military victory, therefore, has produced an incomplete political victory. While regaining some 80 percent of the total Armenian-controlled land area, it left some two thirds of Upper Karabakh still under Armenian—and henceforth also Russian “peacekeeping” —control. This situation entails manifold opportunities for Russia to arbitrate and manipulate the still-unresolved conflict.

The negotiating process from 1994 to date—including the “Basic Principles” that governed the negotiations in the last decade—treated Upper (“Nagorno”) Karabakh as a territorial unit: legally a part of Azerbaijan, but home to an Armenian community entitled to a yet-to-be negotiated “status” vis-à-vis Baku. This territorial unit, however, has now been partitioned between an Armenian-controlled zone in the north and center, hosting Russian “peacekeeping” troops; and an Azerbaijani-controlled zone in the south, free of Russian “peacekeepers.” In accordance with several presidential and governmental decisions, Azerbaijan is installing military-civilian administrations in the regained districts, under direct supervision from the presidential administration in Baku (Azertag, October 29, November 24, December 3).

Only a small number of Armenians resided in Upper Karabakh’s southern zone prior to this war, and they apparently moved to the Armenian-controlled zone after the November 10 armistice (although Baku would have preferred that they stay and become one of Azerbaijan’s showcase minorities). Absent these Armenians, the “status” issue becomes irrelevant to this southern zone; but it remains topical for Upper Karabakh’s Armenian-populated, larger zone and will probably come up for negotiation, once this process resumes in full.

At this stage, however, President Aliyev and Foreign Minister Jeyhun Bayramov take the position that “the Karabakh conflict has conclusively been resolved,” in the sense that Yerevan has “capitulated” militarily, the “period of post-conflict reconstruction” has begun, and Azerbaijan reverts to diplomacy with a view to “reintegrating the Upper Karabakh Armenians within our political, social, and economic spaces” (Azertag, November 21, December 1, 3). Baku apparently rules out a territorially based status for Karabakh’s Armenian community, if and when it reverts to Azerbaijani jurisdiction. Aliyev has mentioned cultural autonomy or municipal self-governance as possible options for Karabakh Armenians (Azertag, November 20, 24, 25, December 1, 3), apparently envisaging those options as internal Azerbaijani solutions, rather than internationally negotiated ones.

In that post-conflict spirit, Baku is actively facilitating the delivery of Russian humanitarian assistance to Upper Karabakh’s Armenian population (Western or other international humanitarian assistance is not forthcoming as yet). Russian assistance cargoes are delivered by air to Yerevan and onward across Azerbaijan, by railway to Barda and by road via Aghdam to Upper Karanakh’s administrative center of Stepanakert (Khankendi). Another delivery route is by railway, from Russia into Azerbaijan and onward via Yevlakh to Upper Karabakh. Yet another route of smaller capacity uses Azerbaijan’s Ganja airport, where assistance cargoes flown in from Russia are similarly forwarded via Barda and Aghdam by Azerbaijani authorities for final delivery to Stepanakert.

Armenia’s government, in the wake of a lost war, still calls for Upper Karabakh’s outright “self-determination” away from Azerbaijan, a stop to “Azerbaijan’s aggression against Artsakh [Armenian name for Upper Karabakh]” and Azerbaijani “de-occupation [sic] of Artsakh’s districts” (TASS, December 3, 8; Arminfo, Armenpress, December 7, 9). This stance flows from Pashinian’s pre-war abandonment of negotiations about Upper Karabakh’s status and switch to the goal of severing “Artsakh” from Azerbaijan to incorporate it with Armenia (see EDM, November 25).

CivilNet: Nikol Pashinyan: An Elected Catastrophe

CIVILNET.AM

00:12

By Tatul Hakobyan

Nikol Pashinyan is a catastrophe that was elected by 70% of Armenia’s population.

It is painful and dangerous especially when those who elected the prime minister – the parliamentary Civil Contract Party and the My Step majority faction – do not recognize this. They continue to live in the “Velvet Armenia” of 2018. But that Armenia no longer exists. They continue to admire and be inspired by a version of Pashinyan that doesn’t exist.

Pashinyan is not Transcaucasia’s first disaster.

In the early 1990s, Georgia and Azerbaijan had their own philosophically driven leaders – Zviad Gamsakhurdia and Abulfaz Elchibey, respectively – and both brought forth disasters to their countries. Both were elected by the people, just like Pashinyan.

Georgia, and to some extent Azerbaijan, became involved in a catastrophic civil war, and suffered crushing defeats in Abkhazia, Ossetia and Artsakh / Karabakh.

But Armenia, while in a blockade, under the rubbles of the 1988 earthquake, with 300,000 refugees, somehow avoided internal political unrest, and won an incredible and unbelievable victory in a war that was forced upon it from 1991 to 1994. Armenia has not remained without internal political crises, but none have led to a civil war.

But Pashinyan, who came to power on the wave that saw the public rejection of former President Serzh Sargsyan, was not able to use the historic opportunity.

His first signs of failure were his approach to politics based on personal affiliation, and his incomprehensible abandonment of institutional reform.

The call to block the entrance to courts was a serious sign that Pashinyan is ignoring the principle of separation of the judicial, executive and legislative branches n, which is at the core  of the rule of law.

When he called on the people to blockade the National Assembly, it became clear that he was rejecting the opportunity to transform from a populist politician to a state leader.

In a squabble with Ilham Aliyev in Munich, which resembled a grade-school spat, Pashinyan demonstrated his provincial mentality.

Ignoring the coronavirus, Pashinyan initiated the “YES” campaign to hold a referendum on dissolving the country’s constitutional court.

Then, when the infection was raging in Armenia, the Armenian authorities gave the green light to elections in Artsakh, and the election of Arayik Harutyunyan.

Pashinyan and his team can be forgiven for these and many other misdeeds since he in fact did receive the people’s vote, and he was able to bring hope to Armenia with the wave that rejected Serzh Sargsyan.

But the catastrophic 44-day war, which resulted in enormous human and territorial losses, as well as a decline in Armenia’s sovereignty, showed that Pashinyan and his team were incapable of governing the state.

Unaware or unwilling to accept that the situation in the country has changed since the 2018 “velvet revolution”, Pashinyan indirectly gives legitimacy to those who have taken to the streets, who by and large are not trusted by the people. They are the rejected opposition, the former government.

On the first day of the war on September 27, Pashinyan announced that he was ready to die for Armenia. It turns out, however, that he is not even ready to sacrifice his seat for the sake of the homeland.

It should not be ruled out that Pashinyan and his team will be able to hold on to power. But at what cost? It doesn’t matter what price Pashinyan and his team pay. What matters is Armenia.

Each day that Pashinyan remains in his position as prime minister is at the expense of the nation. At the expense of the sovereignty, the dignity and the future of this country.

Tatul Hakobyan is a reporter for CivilNet.am.

Sergey Lavrov underlines peaceful coexistence of Armenians and Azeris

MediaMax, Armenia
Dec 7 2020
Yerevan /Mediamax. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has stated today that the November 9 ceasefire statement creates all opportunities for a long-term settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, based on fair principles and in the interests of Armenian and Azerbaijani peoples.

During a joint briefing with Armenian Foreign Minister Ara Ayvazyan in Moscow, Lavrov has said that the statement provides an opportunity to unblock all transport corridors and economic ties in the region.

 “We have suggested involving Armenian and Azerbaijani specialists in the humanitarian center to be established in Nagorno-Karabakh at the initiative of the Russian President, so the center will be international. We wish that the economic and infrastructure recovery contributes to the creation of conditions for the establishment of good-neighborly relations between Armenians and Azeris, both in Nagorno-Karabakh and at the interstate level,” Lavrov said.

 According to him, it would also contribute to creating trust and cooperation in the region for the benefit of all peoples and countries there.

 “We are convinced that people of different nationalities and religions should live in peace and security. We will regularly promote this approach,” Lavrov said.

 Lavrov has added he and Ara Ayvazyan have underlined the role of the OSCE Minsk Group, co-chaired by Russia, France and the United States, in creation of the mentioned conditions.