Duma ratifies agreement on adapted CFE Treaty

Interfax
June 25 2004

Duma ratifies agreement on adapted CFE Treaty

MOSCOW. June 25 (Interfax) – The State Duma voted 355-28 with two
abstentions on Friday to ratify an agreement on the adapted
Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) Treaty, which was signed in
Istanbul in November 1999.

An explanatory note to the document says the treaty must be ratified
by all 30 signatory countries to take effect.

The adapted CFE Treaty will significantly reduce the conventional
arsenals of Europe’s most powerful nations, as well as the United
States and Canada.

“The overall number of tanks to be reduced in NATO’s 19 nations will
total 4,800, armored personnel carriers 4,000, and artillery pieces
4,000, which is equivalent to the arsenal of nearly one dozen
motorized divisions equipped under NATO standards,” the note reads.

The treaty’s enactment will not lead to any automatic cut in Russia’s
arsenal. Under CFE Treaty requirements, Russia will be allowed to
have 6,350 tanks, 11,280 armored personnel carriers, 6,315 artillery
pieces, 3,416 combat aircraft, and 885 helicopter gunships.

The adapted CFE Treaty will allow Russia to keep its weapons and
military hardware in Armenia and Ukraine. Bilateral agreements with
Georgia will enable Russia to keep its 153 tanks, 241 armored
personnel carriers, and 140 artillery pieces in that country.

Armenian PM arrived in Berlin

ArmenPress
June 23 2004

ARMENIAN PRIME MINISTER ARRIVED IN BERLIN

BERLIN, JUNE 23, ARMENPRESS: Armenian prime minister Andranik
Margarian arrived June 22 in Berlin, the capital of the Federal
Republic of Germany on a three-day working visit. The prime minister
will participate in the Armenian-German Economic Cooperation
Conference that opened today at the Center of German Industrialists.
He will also hold a range of bilateral meetings with a number of
highly- ranked officials on the sidelines of the visit.
Yesterday the prime minister met with Germany’s minister for
economic cooperation and development Mrs. Vichorek-Zoil and Berlin
mayor Klaus Wowereith. During the meeting with Mrs. Vichorek-Zoil ,
Andranik Margarian underscored the importance of several
inter-regional projects implemented by the ministry within the
frameworks of the Caucasian Initiative and highlighted Turkey’s and
Azerbaijan’s non-constructive approaches, which tend to shift
economic relations into political level by putting forward political
preconditions. He also reflected on discussions with Georgian
authorities and bilateral interest in developing mutually beneficial
projects. Attaching importance to regional cooperation projects,
Germany’s minister emphasized that they should be sought for by all
the regional states. She said economic cooperation is a good
precondition for improving political relations.
At the request of the minister, Armenian prime minister presented
also the pace of Nagorno Karabagh conflict resolution , economic
indicators of Armenia and Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper, which
Vichorek-Zoil described as “impressive”. The prime then referred to
Armenia’s fulfillments of its commitments on the path to closer
European integration. Importance was also attached to boosting
cooperation in nature protection, energy, infrastructures
development, small and medium- sized businesses and banking.
Andranik Margarian and Vichorek-Zoil noted with satisfaction the
effectiveness of the projects implemented in Armenia with the support
of the German government. Mrs. Vichorek-Zoil informed that her
country is going to provide additional 8 mln Euros for improvement of
water supplies in remote regions of Armenia. She also expressed
readiness to support implementation of new proposals on alternative
energy sources, noting that she had an opportunity to talk about it
with the Armenian energy minister during a conference on energy
issues in Germany.
At the end of the meeting, prime minister Andranik Margarian
thanked Mrs. Vichorek -Zoil for cooperation and understanding. The
minister has personally visited Armenia and know its problems well.
The two expressed hope that cooperation between the two countries
will continue encompassing new fields and will be as effective as
before.
After the meeting with the minister of economic cooperation and
development Armenian prime minister and the delegation accompanying
him visited the Armenian Church in Berlin after which they held
meeting with Klaus Wowereith , the Berlin mayor. During the meeting
with the mayor the sides discussed issues on prospective cooperation
between the two capitals, stating that the economic and political
relations between the two states are a good precondition for
developing ties among regional and local self-management bodies. The
two attached importance to holding cultural days in both countries
and exchange of expertise. The Berlin mayor expressed interest in
economic priorities of Armenia, business partners and prospects of
relations with Turkey. On the request of Klaus Wowereith Andranik
Margarian presented the economic conditions of our country and
strategic plans seeking the support of friendly countries, including
Germany in solving current problems. Armenia prime minister made a
note in the book of honorable guests at the Berlin municipality.
Yesterday evening Andranik Margarian held meetings with Rudolf
Koberlei, who is the deputy prime minister of Baden-Wurtemberg land
and a minister. The sides attached importance to developing ties
between the regions of the two countries. Andranik Margarian urged
Baden Wurtemberg government to invest in Armenia. He invited a
delegation composed of regional leaders and business community to
visit Armenia in order to discuss possible economic projects on the
spot.
Andranik Margarian and Rudolf Koberlei discussed also cooperation
between Gyumri and German regional capital Stuttgart and establishing
sister city relations between the two. The deputy prime minister said
it’s a high honor for Armenian prime minister to meet with Baden
Wurtemberg authorities, the third biggest among 16 lands of Germany.
He wished success to Armenian German economic cooperation conference,
which he said is an important event in developing economic
cooperation between the two states. Andranik Margarian said that it
is very important for Armenia to learn about decentralization
practice, traditions and expertise in Germany. The sides noted that
the friendship between the two countries should develop and encompass
also separate cities and regions. German deputy prime minister,
minister Rudolf Koberlei expressed also interest in economic
situation of Armenia and considered impressive the presented economic
indicators.
In the honor of Armenian prime minister and the delegation
accompanying him yesterday late evening an official reception was
organized in German Baden Wurtemberg Berlin representation.
Today Armenian prime minister Andranik Margarian attended the
opening of Armenian German economic cooperation forum. Slates is his
meeting with education and science minister of Baden Wurtemberg.

German-Armenian Society: Berlin series of lectures

PRESS RELEASE

German-Armenian Society (DAG)
Web:
Contact: Ilyas Kevork Uyar
MĂŒhlenstraße 6
54296 Trier
e-mail: [email protected]

Berlin series of lectures

German-Armenian Society

We are inviting you on

Monday, 28th of June 2003

19:30

in the Hessian permanent representation

located in the MinistergÀrten 5, 10117 Berlin

to a lecture of

Annette Schaefgen

Centre of Research on Anti-Semitism, Berlin

about

^ÓThe Armenian Genocide

as a Topic in German Politics After 1949 .^Ô

About the subject: In the first two decades after the founding of the
Federal Republic of Germany the armenian genocide was no topic in the
political discourse in germany. Only after the growing self-organisation
and political self-regognition of the armenian community in the 70s, does
the regocnition of the genocide became a demand with which german
politicians were faced, first primarily regionally, then however late in
the year 2000 on the federal level through a petition to the German
Bundestag to recognize the genocide.

However, until now for the german side the subject is of only little
relevance. The factors detemining this posiition will be described and
analyzed through documents of the Foreign Office, press articles and
interviews with various members of previous and actual german governments
and other politicians.

Organized by the German-Armenian Society.

Online Contact: Ilyas Kevork Uyar, [email protected]

+++

Wir laden Sie ein

am Montag, 28. Juni 2004, 19.30 Uhr,

in die Hessische Landesvertretung,

In den MinistergÀrten 5, 10117 Berlin,

zum Vortrag von

Annette Schaefgen
Zentrum fĂŒr Antisemitismusforschung

ĂŒber das Thema

Der Völkermord an den Armeniern als Thema in der deutschen Politik nach
1949

Zum Thema: In den ersten beiden Jahrzehnten nach der GrĂŒndung der
Bundesrepublik war der Völkermord an den Armeniern aus dem politischen
Diskurs in Deutschland fast vollstÀndig ausgeblendet. Erst durch die
zunehmende Organisation der Armenier in den 70er Jahren, die auch ein
Erwachen des politischen Bewusstseins der Diaspora-Gemeinde und deren
Forderung nach einer offiziellen Anerkennung des Völkermordes mit sich
brachte, wurden deutsche Politiker zunehmend mit dem Thema konfrontiert,
zunÀchst nur regional und erst im Jahr 2000 mit dem Petitionsantrag zur
Anerkennung des Völkermordes schließlich auch auf Bundesebene.

Die Relevanz, die dem Thema von deutscher Seite beigemessen wird, ist bis
heute kontinuierlich gering. Anhand der Akten des AuswÀrtigen Amtes,
Presseartikeln, Interviews von Vertretern der jeweiligen
Bundesregierungen und anderen Politikern werden Fallbeispiele vorgestellt
und analysiert, durch welche Faktoren das Verhalten der deutschen
Politiker in dieser Frage bestimmt wurden und werden.

Annette Schaefgen hat Geschichte und Latein an der TU Berlin studiert. Am
dort ansĂ€ssigen Zentrum fĂŒr Antisemitismusforschung schreibt sie zur Zeit
ihre Dissertation zum Thema “Die Rezeption des Völkermordes an den
Armeniern in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland”. Sie hat verschiedene
AufsÀtze zu den Armeniern in Deutschland und zur Rezeption des
Völkermordes in der Bundesrepublik, den USA und Israel verfasst. Daneben
arbeitet sie freiberuflich als Bildredakteurin.

www.dag-online.de

The Halo Trust Warns

THE HALO TRUST WARNS

Azat Artsakh – Republic of Nagorno Karabakh (NKR)
18 June 2004

During the first week of June two mine accidents happened in the
territory of Nagorni Karabakh and four people suffered. The first was
on June 3 near the village Meghvadzor, Kashatagh region. Two young
men suffered, Armen Hakobian born in 1964 and Andranik Mossiyan born
in 1982, both from the village Tumi, Hadrout region. Gathering herbs
A. Hakobian stepped on an antipersonnel mine. Wanting to help his
friend A. Mossiyan reached him and also stepped on a PMN-2 mine. One of
them lost his right foot, and the other’s left leg was amputated above
the knee. The second accident happened near the village Myurishen,
Martouni region. Five villagers went for timber in a tractor. On
the way back the antitank mine exploded under the back wheel of
the carrier. Ararat Aroushanian born in 1964 was taken to hospital
with a leg fraction and Davit Avagian born in 1991 received light
injuries. Only in 6 months in 2004 24 people suffered from mines and
unexploded ordnance, of them eight people died. These statistical
data exceed the number of the entire year of 2003 when 21 people
suffered, of them 9 died. Recently often adults become victims of
mines connected with active agricultural works, as well as using
of the territories still not used after the war (hunting, abandoned
vineyards, collecting metals).

AA. 18-06-2004

Solving the Kashmir dispute

OP-ED: Solving the Kashmir dispute —Ishtiaq Ahmed

Daily Times, Pakistan
June 20 2004

Controversial collective rights such as the so-called right of
self-determination should not be invoked to destabilise them. It is
not an ordinary principle of international law and was meant to apply
primarily to colonial empires

The contemporary international system is constituted by sovereign
states whose territorial claims are clearly defined, demarcated and
agreed upon in the form of international boundaries. However,
exceptions to the rule exist and the ensuing territorial ambiguity
can result in two or more states laying mutually exclusive claims to
the same territory.

The post-Second World War colonial withdrawals from Asia and Africa
and the collapse of the multinational Soviet and Yugoslavian
political systems have been typical occasions for such disputes to
emerge because the transfer of power, sharing of common resources and
the allocation of territories rarely correspond to the expectations
and ambitions of the contending political entities. The Kashmir
dispute, the Israel-Palestine imbroglio, Cyprus, East Timor, West
Sahara, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Kosovo and Armenia-Azerbaijan are some
cases in point, though each case has its own peculiarities and
dimensions.

Disputes over territories are exacerbated if the contending parties
do not trust each other. In such cases even the prospect of
significant economic ties and interests and help from regional and
international actors cannot resolutely compel them to negotiate a
peaceful and fair solution. This also applies to the India-Pakistan
impasse on Kashmir.

Apart from the legal fictions maintained by both sides, the problems
of identity and self-image complicate matters. India wants to hold on
to Kashmir as an essential feature of its secular-composite national
identity while Pakistan considers its Muslim identity incomplete as
long as Kashmir has not joined it.

Observers have put across several reasonable solutions. But unless
India and Pakistan abandon the combative nationalist mindset no
progress on the issue is likely. War is not an alternative. Three
full-scale and one confined war have been tried in 56 years but to no
avail. Neither side can win a war even when it has the advantage of
surprise. Both are likely to inflict irreparable damage on each
other. Consequently no zero-sum approach or ‘winner takes all’
solution is going to succeed.

The UN resolutions calling for a plebiscite have failed to work.
Since they are under Ch VI of the Charter, they require the
contending parties to agree to UN mediation. India has ruled out any
such possibility.

The third option of an independent Kashmir has no serious takers
among the Indian and Pakistani establishments. One can also wonder if
indeed the overall security concerns of India and Pakistan will
lessen if a weak state emerges in this volatile region bordering
Afghanistan, Iran and central Asia. Indeed, such a state could well
increase the sense of insecurity and set in motion another round of
confrontational politics between the two states. An independent state
will also be opposed tooth and nail by the Hindus and Buddhists on
the Indian side.

Similarly, the idea that Kashmir should be partitioned along
religious lines is a non-starter. The Muslims of Jammu and the Shia
minority of Ladakh would have their own reasons for opposing it. The
former would be left behind in India and become an even smaller
minority. They would thus be precariously placed and would very
likely face the anger of militant Hindus who would hold them
responsible for India losing much of its Kashmir to Pakistan.

Such a situation is already faced by Indian Muslims who stayed behind
in India after Partition. The Shias only have to look at the way
their sect is being targeted by terrorists in Pakistan. Neither the
Pakistani fundamentalists nor the Kashmiri militants present a
tolerant and peaceful image of Islam. It is futile to believe that
the spread of a terrorist political culture in the garb of freedom
struggle will impress the world or deter the Indian state.

There is also the proposal that the Kashmir Valley should be made
independent. The tiny but very vocal Kashmiri pandits who have been
driven away by the militants and now live in camps in Jammu and Delhi
would oppose any such idea. Also, India will never agree to grant
self-determination on the basis of religious differences.

Under the circumstances, the only workable solution is to convert the
Line of Control into a soft border with India and Pakistan retaining
sovereignty on their respective sides. The idea of a soft border
should be understood as a series of measures aiming to provide
substantial autonomy to the various sub-regions on both sides. Such
an approach would require both states to withdraw or at least
drastically reduce the number of troops stationed on both sides of
the Line of Control. Kashmiris on both sides should be permitted to
move freely across the border though without the automatic right to
settle on the other side.

But solving the Kashmir dispute is impossible without India and
Pakistan agreeing to a comprehensive peace and cooperation agreement.
The Kashmir issue is not the cause but a symptom of a deeper mistrust
between India and Pakistan. The two sides have to appreciate the fact
that they are two sovereign states and that is a settled fact of
history.

Under the circumstances, controversial collective rights such as the
so-called right of self-determination should not be invoked to
destabilise them. It is not an ordinary principle of international
law and was meant to apply primarily to colonial empires.

One may rhetorically argue that India is an imperialist Hindu state
or Pakistan heads a worldwide Islamic expansionist movement. But the
fact remains that the United States and other Western states remain
the real determiners of international economic and political
policies.

Therefore instead of wasting time on mutual recrimination and hostile
propaganda India and Pakistan should close ranks and along with the
other players in South Asia try to develop robust economic and social
ties. That is the only way this region can justly claim respect and
admiration from the rest of the world.

To recap the main arguments, the Kashmir dispute is a social
construction deriving from conflicting nationalist ambitions and
ideologies; it can be solved if we transcend the conflicting
nationalist agendas; both states need to confer maximum autonomy on
their Kashmiri citizens, including their right to interact with one
another legally and freely.

It is most important that extremists and militants are weeded out
from the whole of South Asia and especially from Kashmir. Similarly
India should withdraw its security forces and allow democracy to take
its own course as stipulated within Article 307 of the Indian
constitution.

The author is an associate professor of Political Science at
Stockholm University. He is the author of two books. His email
address is [email protected]

Georgian-Osetian Crisis

GEORGIAN-OSETIAN CRISIS

Azat Artsakh, Republic of Nagorno Karabakh (NKR)
June 18, 2004

After the settlement of the Adzharian problem at the end of May Mikhail
Sahakashvili, pursuing his plan of restoring territorial integrity
of the country, undertook steps directed at the settlement of the
South-Osetian problem. Russian forces were deployed in the territory of
South Osia, according to the authorities, for the aim of prevention
of smuggling. And the minister of home affairs of Georgia Georgy
Bayramidzeh announced that the actions of the Russian peacemakers are
the evidence to the fact that not only the Tskhinvali separatists
but also the Russian “blue helmets” profit from smuggling. In his
turn the head public prosecutor of Georgia Irakli Okruashvili stated
that the times when Russian peacemakers dictated their will have
passed already. At the same time Mikhail Sahakashvili mentioned that
the government of Georgia has established good relationships with
Russia. Mentioning about his telephone talk with Putin president
Sahakashvili said, “We cooperate in a number of spheres, including
struggle against terrorism,” and emphasized that he considers the
present situation as willful actions of the local soldiers. At the
same time he added that after they had received guarantees that they
would not touch their block-posts he decided to withdraw the main units
and return to Tbilisi. The Osetian side gives a different evaluation
to the situation. According to the president of South Osia Edward
Kokoyti, the Georgian party undertakes wide-scale actions directed
at destabilization of the situation in South Osia. “Connected with
the reluctance of Georgia to negotiate and implement the agreements
achieved, the South-Osetian party announces about breaking all types
of relationships with Georgia except for work in the joint working
group and the joint group of experts,” stated Kokoyti. He mentioned
that the relationships would not be resumed until Georgia provided
a number of conditions: adoption of the law on restitution, that is
restoring the rights of Georgian refugees. Second, the parliament of
Georgia must give a political evaluation to the events of 1989-1991
and recognize the genocide of the South-Osetian population. Third,
the Georgian party must pay indemnity which totals 34 billion roubles
by the prices of 1991, said Kokoyti. Russia also gave its official
opinion on these events. The department of information and press of
the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia mentions that the Georgian
party did not implement all the arrangements made during the meeting
of the co-chairman of the Joint Control Commission in Tskhinvali on
June 2. So far the Georgian military units have not been withdrawn
from the Georgian-Osetian conflict area which are there without the
consent of the Joint Control Commission. The Russian party as well,
in the face of the first vice minister of Russia Valeria Loshinina
expressed serious anxiety to the ambassador of the USA in Russia in
reference to the fact that during the diversionary actions in South
Osia the military units trained within the framework of the American
programs of military cooperation with Georgia were used. It should be
mentioned that as formerly for Mikhail Sahakashvili the relationships
with Russia are very important. He announced that Georgia does not
intend taking hasty actions for the region of Tskhinvali (South Osia)
in this context and does not plan any concrete steps for the upcoming
month. In the conflict area against the background of deployment
of Georgian forces, which aggravated the situation, the visits of
ministers and officials of other ranks to South Osia have become
rather frequent. The governor personally took building materials to
that country, the vice minister of building wearing a white shirt
and a tie builds a road, the minister of education himself brings
computers, and the minister of sport brings football players to
play with the “village team”, writes the Russian news agency Regnum.
Accusations are made by the Georgian party as well. The head of the
committee on defence and national security of the Georgian parliament
Givi Targamadzeh announced that Russia brought 150 cars with forces,
weapon and ammunition to the territory of South Osia. According to him,
among them 120 are citizens of South Osia. In his turn the leader
of South Osia denied these news. At the same time Edward Kokoyti
arrived in Moscow with the request to join the Republic of South
Osia to the Russian Federation. The leader of Osia intends extending
the document to the Federal Duma of Russia and president Putin. The
message contains an appeal of creating unified Osia within the Russian
Federation. By the way, after the aggravation of the situation in
South Osia the leaders of this republic openly declare that there are
forces, especially in the other non-recognized republics, which will
aid Osia in case of threat of military aggression. It was mentioned
that there are certain agreements among these republics. In this
announcement the names of Abkhazia and Transdnestrie are mentioned
but not of Karabakh. The minister of foreign affairs of South Osia
Murad Jioev mentioned in his interview to the agency Regnum, “We are
in close cooperation with Karabakh, mainly in the political sphere,
which is first of all manifested in the relationships between the
foreign ministries of our republics. Being separate from the point
of view of territory hinders economic cooperation although we have
common economic interests with Karabakh. Unfortunately no top level
meetings have been organized between our republics but there is always
assistance through letters, telephone and other means, exchange of
delegations takes place.”

NAIRA HAYRUMIAN

PM meets Assembly delegation

PM MEETS ASSEMBLY DELEGATION

ArmenPress
June 18 2004

YEREVAN, JUNE 18, ARMENPRESS: Prime minister Andranik Margarian
received today an Armenian Assembly Board of Directors delegation,
headed by Chairman Anthony Barsamian that arrived in Yerevan June
17 for a 10-day visit to Armenia, Nagorno Karabagh and Georgia for
high-level meetings with government officials.

Government press office said, delegation members introduced the prime
minister to the goal of their visit. They were eager to learn what
kind of joint projects could be implemented with Georgia and what
kind of relationships are between the two countries.

Also discussed were current developments in Armenia and Nagorno
Karabagh, the future cooperation between the govenrment of Armenia
and the Assembly, US aid to Armenia, particular issues concerning
Armenia’s inclusion in the list of 16 countries eligible to Millennium
Challenges Account and the Assembly’s assistance in that respect.

Margarian introduced the delegation members to recent economic
developments, projects underway and what the government is doing
to meet the requirements of the Millennium Challenges Account, that
is expected to help the government carry out its Poverty Reduction
program.

Putin cracks jokes addressing Eurasian forum, slams nationalism,stup

Putin cracks jokes addressing Eurasian forum, slams nationalism, stupidity

Channel One TV, Moscow
18 Jun 04

[Presenter] A meeting of the Interstate Council of the Eurasian
Economic Community began in Kazakhstan’s capital of Astana this
morning. The Presidents of Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia
and Tajikistan are taking part in it. The Armenian leader [Robert
Kocharyan] is participating in the summit as an observer. [Passage
omitted]

Russian President Vladimir Putin has addressed the international
conference “Eurasian integration: contemporary trends and challenges
of globalization” at the Lev Gumilev Eurasian university. [Passage
omitted]

[Correspondent] Opening the conference, Kazakh president Nursultan
Nazarbayev made a speech about problems and prospects of the Eurasian
integration. After that, Putin took the floor, lending the discussion
an informal tone.

[Putin] I have already told [Kazakh president] Nursultan Nazarbayev
that we have arrived here to discuss a humanitarian issue, but he is
not treating us in a humane way. It is six in the morning Moscow time
now. [Laughter among the audience]. I can hardly deliver a wide-ranging
speech about the issues you are going to discuss.

Anyway, there is no doubt that [Russian historian and philosopher
Lev] Gumilev’s ideas have spread among people. Some experts say that
virtually all people are related in the 14th or 15th generation. I
do not know how it looks in the global scheme of things, but in our
land, especially in the Eurasian territory of the former Soviet Union,
we certainly are all relatives, and not in the 14th generation but
closer, obviously. Although, judging from what is written in the
programme that I have, some people are much more closely related
to you. I quote: the forum’s opening ceremony. Then, greetings by
leaders of the Eurasian Economic Community member states. After that,
separately: Kocharyan’s address. [Laughter, a round of applause]

[Correspondent] Joking aside, Putin went on to say that countries
of the former Soviet Union are trying to restore what has been lost
following the disintegration of the Soviet Union, but on a new,
contemporary basis. [Passage omitted]

[Putin] It is far easier to destroy than create. What seemed quite
obvious yesterday, today poses certain difficulties and problems. Using
the intellectual potential of our peoples and taking into account
current developments in the world, we realize that we can safeguard
ourselves from new threats and be competitive in the world of growing
competition only if we combine our efforts.

[Correspondent] Putin was studying the programme of the conference
as other presidents delivered their speeches. Some points of the
programme seemed strange to Putin.

[Putin] I have an impression that enemies of Nazarbayev’s ideas have
infiltrated the pool of organizers. Yes, yes, I’ll explain. There
is a section in the programme called Security of Eurasia. The main
topic for discussion is: “Geopolitical interests of external powers:
the USA, China, the EU, Japan and Russia”. [Laughter]

I understand that one can live according to the principle: “What do I
need geography for? I can take a cab.” However, all one needs to do
is to open a map and see where the Russian Federation is situated –
right in the middle of Eurasia.

Finally, there is the last thing I would like to draw your attention
to. There is a topic [for discussion]: “Conceptual problems of
integrated organizations’ activities”. These problems can be formulated
in a very brief and simple way in three or four sentences. What are
these problems? They are: imperialism, nationalism, personal ambitions
of those who take political decisions and stupidity. Just cave-man
stupidity. But we are clever people. Allow me to finish our today’s
discussion with an appeal: “Clever people of all countries, unite!”

[In a separate report, at 0355 gmt on 18 June, RIA news agency,
Moscow, in Russian, quoted Putin as saying the following: “Speaking
about the security of Eurasia, I think that the overwhelming majority
would agree that not only in Eurasia but worldwide this problem can
hardly be addressed without taking into account the role that Russia
plays in the contemporary world.”]

Armed incident happens on Azerbaijani-Armenian border

Armed incident happens on Azerbaijani-Armenian border

Itar Tass
08.06.2004, 19.32

BAKU, June 8 (Itar-Tass) — One serviceman was killed and another was
wounded in Armenian shooting at Azerbaijani positions in the Fizuli
district of Southwest Azerbaijan, the Azerbaijani Defense Ministry
reported on Tuesday.

The ministry said that Azerbaijani positions came under large-caliber
machinegun fire in the Kazakh district in the country’s west as
well. The shooting stopped only after Azerbaijani servicemen opened
fire, the ministry said.

The ministry bluntly denied Armenian claims of alleged movement of
Azerbaijani units in the conflict zone.

Meanwhile, press secretary of the Armenian defense minister Col. Seiran
Shakhsuvaryan told Itar-Tass that Azerbaijani units tried to take
more advantageous positions on the border near Berkaber village of
Armenia’s Tavush district in the small hours of Monday.

He said Armenian units tried to stop Azerbaijani soldiers from
moving towards a local pump station and the soldiers opened fire at
the village. “Armenian units had to suppress the Azerbaijani fire,”
he said. Shakhsuvaryan said that none of the Armenian servicemen was
killed or wounded.

California Courier Online, June 3, 2004

California Courier Online, June 3, 2004

1 – Commentary
Turks Attempt to Use Armenians
In Anti-Genocide Propaganda

By Harut Sassounian
California Courier Publisher
**************************************************************************
2 – San Diego Conference on Genocide and Denial
Features Scholars, Activists and Educators
3 – Glendale’s Deukmejian Wilderness
Park Re-opened at Ceremonies
4 – Dr. Karamanoukian Donates
$250,000 to Armenian Center
5 – Armenian Education in North America
To be Reviewed at June 4-5 Conference
************************************************************************
1 – Commentary

Turks Attempt to Use Armenians
In Anti-Genocide Propaganda

By Harut Sassounian
Publisher, The California Courier

After publishing viciously anti-Armenian articles for many years, some
Turkish newspapers have changed their tactics. They have adopted a more
subtle approach in attempting to scuttle the just demands of the Armenian
people. Instead of denying the Genocide outright, the Turkish press now
publishes articles that urge Armenians to “let bygones be bygones, and to
look to the future, not the past!” In other words, the Turks are advocating
reconciliation without truth or justice.
To make matters worse, the Turkish media from time to time publishes
interviews with some Armenians who reportedly make conciliatory statements
which are presented as evidence that not all Armenians are “hung up” on the
recognition of the Genocide.
For example, in the May 25th issue of the Turkish Daily News, Burak Bekdil,
after a recent visit to Armenia, published a lengthy commentary titled,
“Why Turks and Armenians must eventually shake hands.” Using deceptively
accommodating language, Bekdil distorts the facts of the Armenian Genocide
and tries to undermine the Armenian demands.
He starts his article by calling the Genocide Memorial Monument in Yerevan
“the only symbol in the world that deeply divides two nations that lived
together in peace for centuries.” By feigning to be indignant, Bekdil asks:
“how many more centuries the Turks and Armenians will be living under the
huge symbolic shadow of one monument?”
In one of the most outrageous lies in his column and in a blatant attempt
to pit Armenians and Kurds against each other, Bekdil shamelessly writes:
“The Armenians claim that the Ottoman Kurds, under orders from the empire
in 1915-18, systematically massacred 1.5 million of their ethnic kin living
in eastern Anatolia.” While it is a fact that some Kurds collaborated with
the Turks and carried out deadly raids on Armenian caravans, no
knowledgeable person would claim that the Kurds committed the Armenian
Genocide, while the Turks acted as innocent bystanders. If that were the
case, the Turkish government would have eagerly recognized “the genocide
committed by the Kurds against the Armenians.”
After repeating the standard Turkish lies on the Armenian Genocide, and
accusing Armenians of “systematically killing hundreds of thousands of
Turks,” while only “thousands of Armenians died from cold weather,
starvation and disease,” Bekdil sheds crocodile tears over the fact that
“in 2004, there are two nations, once friends, accusing each other of a
genocide that is said to have taken place 90 years ago and are locked over
the dispute, perhaps forever.”
Bekdil seems quite ignorant about the most basic facts of not only the
Armenian Genocide, but of Turkish history. Otherwise, he would not have
asked the following very foolish question: “Has any Armenian ever been
curious enough to know how many Turks actually lived in eastern Anatolia in
1915-18 and, if by any chance there were a few, could those few physically
have been capable of massacring 700,000-1.5 million others?”
Bekdil espouses the baseless notion that the Diaspora is dictating to the
Armenian government its hard-line position on the Armenian Genocide.
Armenia “must maintain an extremely delicate balance between what reality
dictates and what its Diaspora sponsors impose,” Bekdil falsely asserts. He
then makes several nonsense statements, such as: “The Armenian mindset is
deeply fractured. Diaspora Armenians think the genocide issue is their
‘raison d’etre.’ As for a possible deal with the Turks, they believe they
should represent the entire Armenian population. Are they not, after all,
the ones who financially keep the Armenian state alive?” Bekdil
conveniently forgets that Pres. Kocharian, at his own initiative, has
included the international recognition of the Armenian Genocide on the
foreign policy agenda of the Republic of Armenia. The Turkish officials are
the ones who reject Armenia’s unconditional offer to establish diplomatic
relations, and they keep the border closed in order to force Armenia’s
population into abandoning their historic claims.
Bekdil then introduces Nishan Atinizian of Boston — one of the major
investors in the new Armenia Marriott Hotel — as someone who “thinks it
would be grossly stupid if Turks and Armenians lived in hostility forever.”
The Turkish commentator then claims that Atinizian thinks, “it is the
historians’ job to find out what really happened 90 years ago.” It is
highly doubtful that Atinizian would make such a statement. Armenians know
first-hand what happened to them. They need no historians to tell them what
happened in 1915! Such a statement would also run counter to the fact that
Atinizian generously contributes large sums of money to a major
Armenian-American activist organization that has, as one of its goals, the
recognition of the Armenian Genocide.
Bekdil claims that Atinizian is “fed up” with American politicians who
benefit from “the genocide industry” by getting campaign contributions from
Armenians, “promising to pay [us] back in genocide memorials.” He is quoted
as saying, “I don’t care if the Americans or the French recognize the
genocide. This is an issue between Armenians and Turks. What more should I
ask from the Turks if they opened their archives so that Turkish Armenians
could trace their family roots?”
Nishan Atinizian told me this week that most of the statements attributed
to him by Bekdil are false. Atinizian angrily said he would write to Bekdil
demanding a retraction and an apology. He had a conversation with the
Turkish commentator at the sidewalk cafe in front of Marriott hotel in
Yerevan and discussed mostly the potential benefits of opening the
Turkish-Armenian border.
Bekdil then continues his column and introduces another Atinizian, David,
of Yerevan – no relation to Nishan. The Turkish commentator presents the
following outrageous views as being those of David’s which are supposedly
sensible like those of most “homeland Armenians”: “a) injecting hatred into
the minds of generations of Turks and Armenians reflects an archaic
thinking that should have no place in the 21st century; b) the genocide was
masterminded by the Ottomans and carried our by the Kurds; c) it happened
because the Russians had engineered an Armenian uprising against the
Ottoman Empire; d) some 350,000 Turks died as well, as a result of Armenian
atrocities in 1915-18; e) the Turkey of today cannot be held responsible
for the genocide; and f) it is totally pointless, against international law
and unrealistic if some Armenians dream of any part of eastern Anatolia as
part of Armenia.” Bekdil commends Nishan and David Atinizian for being
“realists.” Nishan Atinizian, who was present during David’s conversation
with Bekdil, told me this week that David did not make any of these
statements.
We hope that Nishan and David Atinizian and all other Armenians learn a
very valuable lesson – never agree to talk to a Turkish journalist, even
off the record! Otherwise, when the article comes out, and distorted
statements are published in your name, you have to do a lot of back
peddling to prove that you did not make the statements attributed to you.
The two Atinizians should take all necessary steps to set the record
straight so that the Armenian community worldwide would not believe that
they said the things the Turkish Daily News claims they did. The timing of
this Turkish commentary is most unfortunate, as the Atinizians and their
business partners are getting ready to celebrate the grand opening of the
Armenia Marriott Hotel in Yerevan next week. The last thing they need is a
controversial article in the Turkish press claiming that one of their
partners has made such disparaging remarks about the recognition of the
Armenian Genocide.

**************************************************************************
2 – San Diego Conference on Genocide and Denial
Features Scholars, Activists and Educators
SAN DIEGO, CA – Armenian-Americans from all over San Diego County gathered
on the campus of the University of California, San Diego on May 8 for an
academic conference entitled “The Western Response to Genocide and Genocide
Denial.” The event was organized by the Armenian National Committee of San
Diego and the Armenian Student Association of UC San Diego.
The two-part conference featured scholars and experts from various
organizations covering issues from implementing genocide education in
public school curricula to combating Genocide denial in the political and
academic arenas. ANC San Diego activist Dr. Raffi Nazikian moderated the
question and answer sessions at the end of each speaker’s presentation.
Following the last presentation, the guest speakers participated in a panel
discussion where they answered questions raised by the diverse audience of
Armenian and non-Armenian students, educators, community members and
activists.
The first session included Dr. Laurence Baron, Director of the Lipinsky
Institute for Judaic Studies, who discussed the crime of genocide providing
a sequential breakdown of historical landmark events, treaties and trials
marking the criminalization of genocide. UCLA lecturer Dr. Rubina
Peroomian delved into the vast array of literary works that have been
produced in the wake of the post-Genocide era. She cited their significance
to the cultural development of Armenians and their effect on the cultural
identity of future generations.
Dan Alba, Los Angeles Regional Director of Facing History and Ourselves,
led the second half of the conference with his talk on the importance of
implementing the already mandated teaching of genocides in the California
public school curriculum. Dr. Levon Marashlian, Professor of History at
Glendale Community College, continued with his insightful lecture on the
history of legislation and denial of the Armenian Genocide which was
accompanied by a montage of archival video footage. He also dissected the
issues of reparations and reconciliation with the Republic of Turkey and
between Armenians and Turks. Ardashes Kassakhian, Executive Director of
ANCA-WR, ended the conference with an in depth analysis of the political
fight in Congress to secure official U.S. acknowledgment of the Armenian
Genocide and to pressure Turkey to recognize its past crimes against
humanity.
Garo Artinian, ANC San Diego Chair, said the conference was the first of a
series of Genocide conferences that are to follow in the future.
“We were quite pleased with the turnout of the first conference and
lookforward to having it annually. Our goal is to educate the new
generation who would become the future leaders. And with great anticipation
that one day the world conscious would not permit of such violent acts
against humanity,” commented Artinian.
“I’m very proud of the Armenian students at UC San Diego for working with
us in order to bring together such an interesting panel of speakers to
address these important issues and hope that such events continue to
flourish in this great community in San Diego,” he added.
In addition to the Conference, the UC San Diego Armenian Student
Association has organized several events during the past two years
commemorating the Genocide and educating and raising public awareness
amongst the campus community about its denial by Turkey. UC San Diego was
the first campus in the Western United States to have the award winning
film “Ararat” screened on its campus free of charge to the public.
“We plan to have many more cultural and educational events through our
growing organization of dedicated young activists and future leaders,” said
ASA President Mike Gedjeyan. “We look forward to continuing to work with
the ANC on the next academic conference for 2005.”
The San Diego ANC already has plans for a similar conference next year
according to Program Chair Dr. Robert Deranian. Earlier this year, the
ANCA-WR Board honored Deranian with a San Diego Grassroots Activist of the
Year award.
The San Diego Genocide Conference Program Committee included Dr. Deranian,
Artinian (Organizing Committee Co-Chair), Professor James Ajemian, Dr.
Serop Karoglanian, Aykanush Galadzhyan, Gedjeyan (Organizing Committee
Co-Chair), Sanaheen Kodjayian, Dr. Mark Nazarian, Dr. Nazikian, Hasmig
Sillano and Professor Araxy Tatoulian.
**************************************************************************
3 – Glendale’s Deukmejian Wilderness
Park Re-opened at Ceremonies
GLENDALE – The ribbon-cutting ceremony marking the re-opening of the
Deukmejian Wilderness Park by the Glendale Parks, Recreation & Community
Services Division was held recently at the park.
The event included a ribbon-cutting ceremony, an open house, a children’s
crafts and light refreshments. Former Governor George Deukmejian was the
special guest of honor.
“I am highly honored and genuinely pleased that the City of Glendale has
completed major improvements in the Deukmejian Wilderness Park, which will
provide recreational and educational benefits to a countless number of
people for decades to come,” Deukmejian said.
This site will serve as an educational facility for the Glendale park
system, featuring programs and information focusing on the area’s history,
ecosystems, geology, hydrology and other natural systems. Welcoming remarks
and introductions were made by President Charlie Carluccio, of the Glendale
Commission of Parks, Recreation and Services. He was followed by comments
from Glendale Mayor Robert Yousefian, former Mayor Larry Zarian, and
Director of the Glendale Parks, Recreation & Community Services George
Chapjian. Also addressing the audience, were Ranger Russ Hauck and Joe
Edmiston, executive director, Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy.
The new park facilities will provide a staging area for recreation trails
within the 700-acre park and beyond to the Angeles National Forest trail
system. It will also serve as home to the Glendale Park Rangers.
**************************************************************************
4 – Dr. Karamanoukian Donates
$250,000 to Armenian Center
GLENDALE – Dr. Albert Karamanoukian of Glendale, Calif., donated $250,000
for the building of an Armenian Center in Glendale.
The announcement of the donation was made at a May 15 banquet sponsored by
the ARF Aharonian Gomideh of Glendale, attended by more 400 guests at the
Glendale Ararat Homenetmen Hall.
The proposed Center will be built on property adjoining Glendale’s St. Mary
Church, on Central Avenue.
The donation was in honor of Dr. Karamanoukian’s parents Krikor and Mariam
Karamanoukian.
Addressing the audience, the benefactor expressed gratitude toward his
nation and homeland for educating him and making his success possible, as
well his contribution to the Armenian Center.
Speakers and dignitaries at the banquet included Cong. Adam Schiff,
Glendale Mayor Bob Yousefian, City Councilmember Raffi Manoukian, Glendale
United School Board President Gregory Krinorian, College Trustee members
Dr. Armine Hacopian and Ara Najarian, and others.
**************************************************************************
5 – Armenian Education in North America
To be Reviewed at June 4-5 Conference
GLENDALE – The Board of Regents of the Prelacy Armenian School are
organizing a two-day conference to reassess Armenian education in Northern
America in the context of the changing “Armenian-American Identity.”
Open to the public, the conference will be held June 4-5 at Woodbury
University in Burbank, Calif.
“The 21st century has placed new challenges before us,” making “imperative
for us to reassess the mission of Armenian education and the
Armenian-American cultural identity issues in our schools,” the Regents
said in a statement release on May 20.
All Armenian daily schools and their leaders have been invited to
participate and bring their expertise to this dialogue, the Regents said,
with the participation of well-known professionals and experts on the issue
as presenters or panelists.
While the Armenian day schools in North America have a history that dates
back to more than 40 years, recent years have shown that some, if not all,
the schools are having difficulties in coping with the financial, academic,
and socialization issues that follows some of the explosive growth of the
Armenian community in Southern California. Some of the schools suffer from
aging facilities, others from cramped quarters, and yet others from the
lack of finances that prevent the hiring and retention of qualified
instructors required by a challenging academic environment.
Sessions of the conference will be open to the public.
For more information, contact the Board of Regents at (818) 500-0822, or
e-mail [email protected]
**************************************************************************
The California Courier On-Line is a service provided by the California
Courier. Subscriptions or changes of address should not be transmitted
through this service. Information in that regard should be telephoned
to (818) 409-0949; faxed to: (818) 409-9207, or e-mailed to:
[email protected]. Letters to the editor concerning issues
addressed in the Courier may be e-mailed, provided it is signed by
the author. Phone and/or E-mail address is also required to verify
authorship.
**************************************************************************