Tuesday,
Armenia, Azerbaijan Preparing For Further Talks
• Shoghik Galstian
U.S. -- Foreign Ministers Ararat Mirzoyan of Armenia and Jeyhun Bayramov of
Azerbaijan meet in Washington, November 7, 2022.
Armenia and Azerbaijan are discussing the date and venue of an upcoming meeting
of their foreign ministers, the Armenian Foreign Ministry said on Tuesday.
The leaders of the two South Caucasus states reached an agreement on that
meeting during weekend talks in Munich hosted by German Chancellor Olaf Scholz.
They said the ministers will focus on an Armenian-Azerbaijani peace treaty.
“The parties are working out [a date for the meeting,]” Ani Badalian, the
Foreign Ministry spokeswoman, told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service. “In case of
reaching a final agreement, we will inform you further.”
It remained unclear whether the upcoming negotiations will be direct or mediated
by a third party.
U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken had been scheduled to host his Armenian
and Azerbaijani counterparts in Washington last November. Azerbaijan’s Foreign
Minister Jeyhun Bayramov withdrew from the trilateral meeting in protest against
what his office called pro-Armenian statements made by a senior U.S. diplomat.
Washington afterwards failed to convince the Azerbaijani leadership to
reschedule it.
Speaking three days before Saturday’s summit, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev
said that Baku “doesn’t need mediators to normalize relations with Yerevan” and
that the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict “should be removed from the international
agenda.”
Yerevan has insisted on continued Western mediation. In the run-up to the Munich
talks, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian accused Baku of walking away from
understandings reached during his earlier encounters with Aliyev organized by
the European Union. But he said on Sunday that both sides are “committed to
those understandings” relating to the basic parameters of the peace treaty.
“A number of articles of the peace treaty have been agreed but a number of
articles of fundamental importance have not yet been agreed, and efforts must be
made in that direction,” said Pashinian.
Karabakh Leaders ‘Working On Mass Repatriation’ (UPDATED)
• Ruzanna Stepanian
• Astghik Bedevian
A satellite image shows a long traffic jam of vehicles along the Lachin corridor
as ethnic Armenians flee from the Nagorno-Karabakh, September 26, 2023.
A member of Nagorno-Karabakh’s exiled leadership said on Tuesday that it is
taking “concrete steps” for the eventual repatriation of the region’s ethnic
Armenian population displaced by last September’s Azerbaijani military offensive.
“Our struggle will continue,” Gagik Baghunts, the acting Karabakh parliament
speaker, told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service. “The Armenians of Artsakh will not
accept the idea that we have closed the page of Artsakh, and the desire to
return will always stay with us. I hope that we will have significant success in
that direction already in the not-so-distant future.”
“We are taking concrete steps, we will continue to do everything possible so
that the Artsakh Armenians return to the homeland, our historical homeland, and
I hope that despite my rather old age, I will return, not my grandchildren.”
Baghunts refused to shed light on those efforts, saying only that the Karabakh
leaders are ready for “cooperation with world powers” and even “contacts with
the Azerbaijani authorities.” He would not say whether there have already been
such contacts.
Armenia - Gagik Baghunts, the acting Karabakh parliament speaker, talks to
RFE/RL, .
The Azerbaijani government says that the Karabakh Armenians are free to return
to their homes if they agree to live under Azerbaijani rule. Karabakh’s leaders
and ordinary residents rejected such an option even before the Azerbaijani
offensive forced them to flee to Armenia. None of the more than 100,000 Karabakh
refugees are known to have expressed a desire to return home in the current
circumstances.
The Russian Foreign Ministry said last week that Moscow and Baku are now
“discussing prospects for the return of the Armenian population to Karabakh.”
Karabakh’s human rights ombudsman, Gegham Stepanian, dismissed the statement,
saying that only “international guarantees” could convince the Karabakh
Armenians to return to their homeland.
Armenia’s government does not seem to be seeking such guarantees. Prime Minister
Nikol Pashinian has repeatedly indicated that the Karabakh issue is closed for
his administration.
Pashinian’s political allies lashed out at Samvel Shahramanian, the Karabakh
president, in late December after he declared null and void his September 28
decree liquidating the self-proclaimed Nagorno-Karabakh Republic. Shahramanian
said that he had to sign the decree in order to stop the Azerbaijani assault and
enable the Karabakh Armenians to safely flee to Armenia.
Shahramanian, Baghunts and other Yerevan-based Karabakh leaders laid flowers at
the Yerablur military ceremony in Yerevan on Tuesday as they marked the 36th
anniversary of the start of a popular movement for Karabakh’s unification with
Karabakh. Later in the day, the Karabakh legislature held a special session on
the occasion.
Nagorno-Karabakh - Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian holds a rally in
Stepanakert, August 5, 2019.
For the first time, Pashinian, who had famously declared in 2019 that “Artsakh
is Armenia,” issued no statement on the anniversary.
“Both in 1988 and today, the realization of peoples’ right to self-determination
and democratic freedoms remain a clear goal for us,” he stated in February 2020.
“And we are sure that we will achieve our goals with joint efforts.”
Pashinian stopped championing that right in early 2022 and publicly recognized
Azerbaijani sovereignty over Karabakh a year later. His critics say that the
drastic policy change paved the way for Baku’s recapture of the depopulated
region. The premier has reportedly refused to meet Shahramanian and other
Karabakh leaders since they took refuge in Armenia.
“Armenia did not have a foreign policy, it had a Nagorno-Karabakh policy,”
Pashinian claimed in December 2023. “Armenia did not have a security agenda, it
had a Nagorno-Karabakh security agenda. The resources that we should have
invested in creating the Republic of Armenia we have invested in creating the
Nagorno-Karabakh Republic.”
Growth In Armenian Exports To Russia Moderates
Armenia - Commercial trucks parked at the Bagratashen border crossing with
Georgia, November 29, 2018. (Photo by the State Revenue Committee of Armenia)
A rapid growth in Armenia’s exports to Russia, driven in large measure by
Western sanctions against Moscow, appears to have slowed down significantly in
the fourth quarter of last year.
Armenia was quick to take advantage of the sweeping sanctions imposed following
the Russian invasion of Ukraine, re-exporting second-hand cars, consumer
electronics and other goods manufactured in Western countries and their allies
to Russia. This explains why its exports to Russia tripled in 2022 and doubled
in January-August 2023.
Full-year data released by the Armenian government’s Statistical Committee shows
that they rose by less than 39 percent, to $3.4 billion, in 2023. This suggests
that the lucrative re-exports largely stagnated last fall and December. The
recent introduction of a new Russian tax on imports of used and old cars may
have been one of the factors behind the slowdown.
Also, the re-exports prompted concern from European and especially U.S.
officials in early 2023. They pressed the Armenian authorities to comply with
the Western sanctions. The authorities introduced in May mandatory government
licenses for shipments of microchips, transformers, video cameras, antennas and
other electronic equipment to Russia.
Overall Russian-Armenian trade soared by more than 43 percent to $7.3 billion.
It grew steadily even before the war in Ukraine not least because of Armenia’s
accession in 2014 to the Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union.
Russia has since replaced the EU as Armenia’s number one trading partner.
According to the Armenian government data, it accounted last year for over 35
percent of the South Caucasus country’s foreign trade, compared with the EU’s 13
percent share in the total.
Reposted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2024 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
Author: Chakrian Hovsep
Armenia has deep relationship with Iran – PM Pashinyan
13:20,
YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 19, ARMENPRESS. Armenia has a deep relationship with Iran and will continue to remain committed to these ties, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has said.
“We have a deep relationship with the Islamic Republic of Iran, and we continue to be committed to these relations,” Pashinyan said at a meeting with Armenian community representatives in Munich. “But this is also one of the cases where not everything is clear. Our good relations with Iran cause tensions in some places, while our good relations with other countries cause tensions in Iran.”
Armenia Assists the Transfer of Military Equipment to Israel’s Enemies
Podcast: More military escalations between Armenia and Azerbaijan
Armenian Prime Minister Says ‘We Are Not Russia’s Ally’ Amid Ongoing War In Ukraine: ‘That’s The Reality’
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan made it clear that Armenia is not an ally of Russia in its conflict with Ukraine. He also emphasized that Armenia’s military projects are not aimed at any specific nation.
What Happened: Pashinyan, in an interview with the British newspaper The Daily Telegraph, stated that Armenia does not consider itself a Russian ally in the Ukraine conflict. He also expressed hope for a lasting peace treaty with Azerbaijan, despite recent border demarcation statements by the Azerbaijani president.
Pashinyan, who has previously voiced concerns about Russia’s support for Armenia’s defense, reiterated his stance on Armenia’s relationship with Russia. He also clarified that Armenia’s security cooperation with other partners, such as the U.S. and France, is not directed against any specific ally.
“I said, in the Ukraine situation, we are not Russia's ally. And that's the reality,” Pashinyan told the daily.
“But I want to also tell you that with the U.S. or France or other partners, our security cooperation is not targeted against our other security sector partner,” he said.
He further stated that Armenia has no plans to pursue NATO membership, a decision that has been reaffirmed by Ukraine and denounced by Russia. Pashinyan also mentioned that Armenia is evaluating its position within the Russian-led Collective Security Treaty Organisation.
Regarding the peace agreement with Azerbaijan, Pashinyan noted that significant progress had been made in 2023. However, recent statements by President Ilham Aliyev have raised doubts about the finalization of the agreement.
Why It Matters: The recent comments by Pashinyan are indicative of a shift in Armenia’s foreign policy, particularly in its relationship with Russia. This development comes in the wake of Armenia’s concerns about Russia’s support following the 2022 clashes between Armenia and Azerbaijan, which raised questions about Russia’s role as a peace broker in the region.
Meanwhile, the Ukraine conflict has been a source of global concern. In a recent interview, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy warned of the potential for the ongoing conflict with Russia to escalate into a global conflict. He has also called for increased support from Western nations.
Armenian Armed Forces Celebrate 32nd Anniversary, Reiterate Sovereignty Pledge
In a gathering that brought together representatives from the US Department of Defense, State Department, Military Diplomatic Corps, and a delegation from the Kansas National Guard, the Armenian Embassy in the United States hosted a reception to celebrate the 32nd anniversary of the Armenian Armed Forces. This event, held on , served as a testament to the enduring partnership between Armenia and the United States, as well as a reaffirmation of Armenia's commitment to protecting its sovereignty.
The reception featured speeches by the Armenian military attaché to the US, the Armenian Ambassador to the US, and the US Deputy Secretary of Defense. Each speaker emphasized the importance of the Armenian Armed Forces in maintaining peace and stability in the region, as well as the strong ties between the two nations. The atmosphere was one of unity and strength, as guests paid tribute to the sacrifices made by Armenian soldiers in defense of their homeland.
In a recent interview with The Telegraph, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan underscored the importance of a strong and combat-ready army for the Republic of Armenia. "We have a sovereign right to have a strong and combat-ready army to protect our territorial integrity, sovereignty, independence, and statehood," he stated emphatically. Pashinyan also highlighted Armenia's recognition of the territorial integrity of all countries in the region, expecting the same recognition in return.
Addressing recent statements made by the President of Azerbaijan regarding the Armenian armed forces, Pashinyan emphasized that as long as Azerbaijan does not announce its withdrawal from the Sochi and Prague statements, it is clear that both Armenia and Azerbaijan recognize each other's territorial integrity based on the 1991 Alma-Ata declaration. This call for respect and diplomacy reflects the ongoing efforts by Armenia to maintain peace and stability in the region, even in the face of challenges.
Armenia's Unwavering Commitment to Sovereignty
As the Armenian Armed Forces mark their 32nd anniversary, the Republic of Armenia remains steadfast in its commitment to protecting its territorial integrity, sovereignty, independence, and statehood. By fostering strong partnerships with nations such as the United States, Armenia continues to demonstrate its dedication to peace and stability in the region. The recent reception at the Armenian Embassy in the United States served as a poignant reminder of the strength and unity that underpin Armenia's efforts to safeguard its sovereignty.
In the words of Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, "We have a sovereign right to have a strong and combat-ready army to protect our territorial integrity, sovereignty, independence, and statehood." This conviction, echoed by Armenian leaders and reaffirmed through events like the recent reception, stands as a testament to the enduring spirit of the Armenian people and their unwavering commitment to their homeland.
https://bnnbreaking.com/international-affairs/armenian-armed-forces-celebrate-32nd-anniversary-reiterate-sovereignty-pledge
Armenia’s Declaration of Independence Not ‘Sacrosanct,’ Pashinyan’s Party Leader Says
Armenia's Declaration of Independence was adopted on August 23, 1990
YEREVAN (Azatutyun.am)—Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s political team has not yet made a final decision on whether to try to remove from Armenia’s constitution any reference to a 1990 declaration of independence resented by Azerbaijan, a senior lawmaker said on Tuesday.
“I want to make clear that we do not have a final conclusion,” Hayk Konjoryan, the parliamentary leader of Pashinyan’s Civil Contract party, told reporters. “It’s still too early to make a final conclusion and raise questions from that standpoint.”
Konjoryan at the same time stressed: “We must not regard any text as sacrosanct.”
The declaration in turn refers to a 1989 unification act adopted by the legislative bodies of Soviet Armenia and the then Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast and calls for international recognition of the 1915 Armenian genocide. It is cited in a preamble to the current Armenian constitution adopted in 1995.
Pashinyan again criticized the declaration last week, claiming that Armenia “will never have peace” with Azerbaijan as long as it is mentioned by the constitution. Accordingly, he defended his plans to try to enact a new constitution that would presumably make no such reference.
Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev said on February 1 that Armenia should remove that reference and amend other documents “infringing on Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity” if it wants to make peace with his country. Armenian opposition leaders portrayed Aliyev’s statement as further proof that Pashinyan wants to effectively declare the 1990 declaration null and void under pressure from Azerbaijan as well as Turkey.
“Aliyev and Pashinyan almost simultaneously … presented the same demands to the people of Armenia,” one of them, Artur Khachatrian, told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service. “It is obvious that Aliyev is thus forcing Pashinyan to make concessions.”
Konjoryan denied that Pashinyan wants to change the constitution at the behest of Aliyev. Pashinyan sounded less categorical on this score in a reportedly pre-recorded radio interview broadcast on February 1.
Khachatryan is one of several lawmakers from the main opposition Hayastan alliance who have been allowed by the Armenian Foreign Ministry to see in recent weeks written proposals regarding an Armenian-Azerbaijani peace treaty exchanged by Yerevan and Baku. In a joint statement issued on February 2, the lawmakers insisted that the Azerbaijani terms of the treaty are extremely unfavorable for the Armenian side.
“I stand by our assertion that the country which presented such proposals to us has no desire or intention to sign a peace treaty with us,” Khachatrian insisted on Tuesday.
Edmon Marukyan, an Armenian ambassador-at-large and political ally of Pashinyan, likewise charged on February 2 that Baku is not serious about signing the peace deal. He said Aliyev’s demands for the constitutional change in Armenia amount to a “new precondition.”
Cafesjian Center for the Arts announces “Seeking the House of the Deaf” educational program
YEREVAN—The Cafesjian Center for the Arts (CCA) has announced the launch of a new educational program: “Seeking the House of the Deaf.”
The program is based on the exhibition, Sahak Poghosyan: Quinta del Sordo, on display at CCA until April 28, 2024.
Sahak Poghosyan: Quinta del Sordo is a monumental project displayed at Eagle and Sasuntsi Davit Garden galleries of the Cafesjian Center for the Arts. It interweaves historical, conceptual, visual and artistic narratives․ The main goal of the educational program is to reveal these narratives.
In the first part of the program, participants will become acquainted with the exhibition. Then, the program will continue in the Creative Hall, where a presentation on Poghosyan’s Quinta del Sordo exhibition will be shown, drawing a connection between the works of old masters and contemporary works of art.
Summarizing the educational program, participants will engage in a discussion exploring the significance of artistic themes in the contemporary world.
The Cafesjian Center for the Arts continuously encourages participants to explore and express their passion for art.
This program is designed for participants ages 16 and up and is free with prior registration.
For further information and registration, please call +374 10 54-19-32/34.
The Cafesjian Center for the Arts is dedicated to bringing the best of contemporary art to Armenia and presenting the best of Armenian culture to the world. Having celebrated its grand opening in November 2009, CCA continues to exhibit unique works of modern art, offers a wide variety of exhibitions and a diverse program of lectures, films, concerts and numerous educational initiatives for children and adults. Annual visitation of the Cafesjian Center for the Arts exceeds 1,000,000 people. The Cafesjian Center for the Arts is an institutional member of the International Council of Museums (ICOM).
Nicolas Anelka visits forcibly displaced children of Nagorno-Karabakh in Armenia
12:26,
YEREVAN, JANUARY 18, ARMENPRESS. Nicolas Anelka, the French professional football manager and retired player has visited the Sport and Culture Center in the Armenian city of Abovyan to meet with forcibly displaced children of Nagorno-Karabakh.
Anelka, who arrived in Armenia for a project on opening a football academy, gifted presents to the children.
Armenia National Olympic Committee President Gagik Tsarukyan accompanied Anelka during the visit to Abovyan.
In a statement, Tsarukyan said Anelka had expressed desire to meet the children of Nagorno-Karabakh and gift them presents.
The Sport and Culture Center in Abovyan has been providing shelter to the NK children since September 2023.
[see video]
Pashinyan calls Aliyev’s statements a blow to the peace process
President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev during the interview on Jan. 10, 2024 (Photo: Office of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan)
YEREVAN—Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has called Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev’s recent provocative statements damaging to the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace process.
In a January 10 interview, Aliyev unveiled a comprehensive strategy that encompasses political alignment with Moscow, territorial demands against Armenia, and a dismissal of historical maps, marking a significant shift in the region’s geopolitical landscape.
These remarks prompted a strong response from Pashinyan. “I consider Baku’s latest statements a serious blow to the peace process,” Pashinyan said on January 13. He highlighted the importance of the border delimitation process, emphasizing that its goal is not to create a new border but to reproduce the borders that existed at the time of the Almaty Declaration of 1991. Pashinyan accused Azerbaijan of attempting to form territorial claims against Armenia.
President Aliyev’s recent call for an unhindered road through Meghri, Armenia, has raised eyebrows, underscoring a deepening political alliance with Russia. During the January 10 interview, Aliyev reiterated his demand for a corridor without border controls passing through southern Armenia and insisted that the route should be monitored by Russian soldiers. Aliyev’s emphasis on the need for Russian control adds complexity to the geopolitical landscape in the South Caucasus and is seen as a Turkish-backed project by Ani Avetyan of the Voskanapat Analytic Center.
Aliyev has rejected Armenia’s proposal to use Soviet-era maps from 1975 as the basis for negotiations, challenging the foundation of diplomatic talks. Azerbaijan has asserted its unwillingness to retreat from territories occupied during the 2021 conflict, hinting at potential expansionist ambitions. The Azerbaijani leader’s historical revisionism, dismissing maps predating the 1970s, has wider implications for the negotiation process.
Armenia faces challenges in navigating the intricate geopolitics of the South Caucasus as Azerbaijan’s strategic realignment and territorial aspirations unfold. The international community is closely watching for potential consequences stemming from these evolving dynamics.
President Aliyev’s recent three-hour interview, marking the beginning of his pre-election campaign, provided insight into his views on ongoing Armenian-Azerbaijani negotiations. Varuzhan Geghamyan, a scholar of Turkish history, highlighted 10 key points that underpin Aliyev’s strategy:
- Border Ambiguity: The proposed “peace treaty” avoids specifying the border between Armenia and Azerbaijan, potentially enabling Azerbaijan to violate the agreement at any time without a defined border.
- Territorial Retention: Azerbaijan will not release internationally recognized territories of Armenia occupied after November 2020, dismissing the idea of a “mirror withdrawal of troops” proposed by Armenia.
- Unilateral Agreement: Azerbaijan aims to sign the document without an international intermediary, allowing for potential violations without international complications.
- Blockade Continuation: Azerbaijan plans to maintain a complete blockade of Armenia and will not open the border, aligning with Turkey’s position.
- Village Liberation: Azerbaijan insists on retaking eight villages inside Armenia’s borders as enclaves it claims are currently occupied by Armenia, demanding mini-corridors to the enclaves for Azerbaijani inhabitants.
- Syunik Corridor: Azerbaijan seeks a corridor through the Syunik province of Armenia, specifically through the town Meghri, as the “shortest and most convenient way” to its exclave Nakhichevan.
- Capture of Leaders: Aliyev expresses intent to capture former presidents Serzh Sargsyan and Robert Kocharyan.
- Turkic Place Names: Aliyev consistently uses Turkic place names for Armenian areas, reflecting a broader effort to shape Azerbaijani societal perceptions.
- Confidence in Gas Supply: Azerbaijan, a key gas supplier to the European Union, asserts confidence in managing Western pressure, emphasizing the need for strategic dealings with Russia.
- Peace Treaty Manipulation: The interview suggests that Azerbaijan may not seek peaceful coexistence with Armenia, viewing the “peace treaty” as a manipulation to weaken Armenian resistance. Concessions from Armenia on these points may lead to further demands from Azerbaijan and Turkey, reminiscent of the dangers faced by Syunik and Jermuk after concessions on the Artsakh issue.
Artak Zakaryan, a member of the executive body of the Republican Party of Armenia (RPA), expressed strong opposition to Aliyev’s recent declaration that Yerevan and Jermuk belong to Azerbaijan. In an interview with ABC media, Zakaryan highlighted that the issue of the right to self-determination of the people of Artsakh can only be considered closed by adhering to international norms and legislation.
Zakaryan emphasized that, according to international legislation, illegal actions have taken place against the people of Artsakh, including ethnic cleansing, forced displacement and risks of genocide. He urged the governing authorities of Armenia to approach the problem from the perspective of protecting their own interests rather than justifying Aliyev’s illegal demands.
The RPA official said the Armenian people should not be criticized for expressing their historical memory and accused the authorities of giving Azerbaijan the opportunity to make territorial claims against Armenia, referring to “Western Azerbaijan,” an irredentist concept used by Azerbaijan against Armenia. Zakaryan cautioned that such actions risk handing over the Republic of Armenia on a platter or, at the very least, preparing the ground for phased actions.
“[Armenians] patiently wait and hope that something good can happen from the conspirators, but it won’t happen. There will be deception, new losses, new victims, attempts at groundless explanations, searches for new culprits in other places, and an extension of one’s own infamous power,” Zakaryan said.
As tensions rise over territorial claims, the concerns of the people of Armenia regarding Azerbaijan’s assertions and the region’s stability increase.
Tatev Hayrapetyan, an expert on Azerbaijan, provided insight into the Armenian government’s reaction to Aliyev’s statements. Hayrapetyan argued that propaganda sites and expert circles close to Pashinyan are attempting to downplay Aliyev’s speech as connected to pre-election events. However, she emphasized that Aliyev’s statements have been consistent over the past year, indicating a more profound and longstanding plan for the occupation of Armenian territories.
Hayrapetyan urged the removal of Pashinyan and his team as essential to prevent the danger of war and maintain regional stability. She criticized the Armenian authorities for remaining silent and making concessions instead of presenting Azerbaijan’s policies to the international community, emphasizing that the de facto dictatorial regime in Baku is becoming a real threat to regional stability.