Skip to main content

Security Council chief briefs Euronest PA vice president on Armenia position on Karabakh conflict settlement

 NEWS.am 
Armenia – Feb 21 2022

YEREVAN. – Secretary of the Security Council of Armenia, Armen Grigoryan, on Monday met with Andrius Kubilius, a Lithuanian Member of the European Parliament and Vice President of the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly, the Office of the Security Council of Armenia informed Armenian News-NEWS.am.

The secretary of the Security Council presented to his interlocutor Armenia’s positions on stability in the region, the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, the unblocking of regional communications, and the demarcation and delimitation of the Armenia-Azerbaijan border.

Also, Grigoryan stressed the need for the Karabakh conflict’s settlement under the auspices of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs, as well as presented humanitarian issues that need to be addressed urgently.

Kubilius, for his part, lauded the course of democratic reforms in Armenia, and stressed that Lithuania is ready to expand the scope of its bilateral cooperation with Armenia and contribute to the deepening of Armenia-EU cooperation.

Azerbaijani press: "Justice for Khojaly!" billboards installed in Kyiv [PHOTO]

By Sabina Mammadli

As part of the “Justice for Khojaly!” international awareness campaign, billboards dedicated to the 30th  anniversary of the tragedy have been placed in the center of the Ukrainian capital, Kyiv, Azertag has reported.

The purpose of the billboards, which was initiated by the Rada of Azerbaijanis of Ukraine (UAR), is to inform local residents and foreigners about the Khojaly genocide. Billboards are located in the busiest central areas of Kyiv – Victory Avenue, Glibochitska, Sichovich Striltsa, Lesi Ukrainki streets, Kyiv-Borispol highway.

The billboards depict the “Mother’s Cry” statue, which represents the Khojaly genocide, as well as the slogan “Justice for Khojaly!”

The billboards will remain in Ukraine until late February.

Armenia committed genocide against the 7,000-person population of Azerbaijan’s Khojaly town on February 26, 1992.

A total of 613 peaceful Azerbaijanis were killed, including 63 children, 106 women, and 70 elderly people. At the same time, 487 civilians were seriously injured and 1,275 people were taken hostage. The fate of 150 hostages, including 68 women and 26 children, is still unknown. During the genocide, 56 people were killed with special cruelty, people’s heads were peeled off, various limbs were cut off, their eyes were removed, and pregnant women’s bellies were pierced with bayonets. As a result, eight families were completely destroyed, 25 children lost both parents and 130 children lost one parent.

Relevant documents adopted by the parliaments of Mexico, Pakistan, the Czech Republic, Peru, Colombia, Panama, Honduras, Sudan, Guatemala and Djibouti recognized the Khojaly massacre as an act of genocide. The parliaments of Romania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Jordan, Slovenia, Scotland, and Paraguay, as well as the executive and legislative bodies of 22 U.S. states have strongly condemned the Khojaly tragedy as a massacre. The Organization of Islamic Cooperation recognized Armenia as an aggressor and the Khojaly tragedy as genocide.

Every year on February 26, the victims of the Khojaly genocide are remembered at the initiative of national leader Heydar Aliyev.

This heinous act was preceded by a slew of others. Armenians set fire to around 20 buildings in the Baghanis-Ayrim village of Gazakh region, killing eight Azerbaijanis. A family of five, including a 39-day-old newborn, were all burnt alive.

Between June and December 1991, Armenian troops murdered 12 and wounded 15 Azerbaijanis in Khojavand region’s Garadaghli and Asgaran region’s Meshali villages.

Armenian military detachments bombed buses on the Shusha-Jamilli, Aghdam-Khojavand, and Aghdam-Garadaghli routes in August and September of the same year, killing 17 Azerbaijanis and injuring over 90 others.

In October and November 1991, Armenians burned, destroyed, and plundered over 30 settlements in the mountainous area of Karabakh, including Tugh, Imarat-Garvand, Sirkhavand, Meshali, Jamilli, Umudlu, Garadaghli, Karkijahan, and other significant villages.

Armenpress: Operational issues minimizing negative consequences are on EAEU agenda – Armenian PM

Operational issues minimizing negative consequences are on EAEU agenda – Armenian PM

Save

Share

 10:42, 25 February, 2022

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 25, ARMENPRESS. The geopolitical developments will leave their impact on the economic environment of the Eurasian Economic Union, and in this context it’s very important to discuss what kind of operational decisions must be adopted in order to lead that negative consequences to a minimum, or if possible, to bypass them, Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan said during the session of the Eurasian Inter-governmental Council in Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.

“The results of 2021 were positive for the Eurasian Economic Union. Truly, 2021 was also a crisis year in general, but the trade turnover volume within the EAEU has increased, and this is a positive signal for all of us. It’s worth noting that there is a potential to expand the EAEU region, there are observer countries with which we are effectively cooperating, and there is also an interest by other countries. This is also a positive process”, the PM said.

Pashinyan expressed hope that they will manage to run such a policy so that the Union is strengthened as an economic platform in the current situation and continues giving positive signals for the economic development of member states.

Normalization with Turkey discussed at Armenia’s Foreign Ministry

Public Radio of Armenia
Feb 16 2022

Minister of Foreign Affairs Ararat Mirzoyan met with the Deputy Speaker of the National Assembly, Special Representative for the Armenia-Turkey normalization process Ruben Rubinyan, representatives of the scientific and expert community.

During the meeting, the sides exchanged views on the process of normalization of relations between Armenia and Turkey.

Armenian-Greek relations are on solid foundations: Armenian Ambassador meets with Greek FM

Save

Share

 20:18,

YEREVAN, 17 FEBRUARY, ARMENPRESS. Ambassador of Armenia to Greece Tigran Mkrtchyan met with the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Greece Nikos Dendias, ARMENPRESS reports the Embassy of Armenia in Greece informs.

The Greek Foreign Minister congratulated the Ambassador on the launch of his mission and wished him success.

Nikos Dendias said that the Armenian-Greek relations are traditionally on a solid foundation, only positive dynamics should be expected in that respect.

Ambassador Tigran Mkrtchyan presented the main directions of his mission. The Ambassador noted that in parallel with the current active political dialogue and military cooperation, there are wide opportunities to deepen bilateral economic ties, scientific-educational-cultural contacts, as well as parliamentary diplomacy.

Ambassador Tigran Mkrtchyan presented Armenia’s positions on regional developments.

Armenian businesses see both opportunity and threat from opening of Turkish border

EurasiaNet.org
Feb 10 2022
Arshaluis Mgdesyan Feb 10, 2022
The border has been closed since 1993. (Alexei Fateev / Alamy)

As Armenia and Turkey progress on normalizing relations and opening their shared border, businesses in Armenia are watching the process with a mixture of fear and anticipation. 

While some businesspeople see the opening of the Turkish border as a step toward gaining access to foreign markets, others worry that they will drown in a flood of cheap, relatively high-quality Turkish products. 

Armenia’s National Security Council recently commissioned a study, “Opportunities and Challenges for Turkey’s Lifting of the Blockade of Armenia,” from the Amberd Research Center of the Armenian State Economic University. The study has not yet been published but some of its conclusions were made available to Eurasianet. 

According to the report’s projections, opening the border could increase Turkish exports to Armenia by 65 percent, and increase Armenian exports the other way by up to 42 percent. While the report notes that opening would reduce logistics costs and enable access to new markets, it concludes that the risks to Armenian industry are “very high” and that competition with cheaper Turkish goods is “a matter of national security for us.”

Turkish products have long been widely available in Armenia, but they must be imported via a third country, usually Georgia. The border between Turkey and Armenia has been closed since 1993, during the first Armenia-Azerbaijan war, when Turkey unilaterally shut it to protest Armenians’ capture of Azerbaijani territory outside Nagorno-Karabakh.

The talks now are aimed at reopening that border, which would greatly facilitate bilateral trade and lead to even lower costs for Turkish goods. While Armenian consumers would benefit, business stands to suffer from the heightened competition.

Armenia-Turkey trade is already heavily one-sided – in 2019, bilateral trade amounted to $270 million, all but $2 million of which was Turkish imports to Armenia. But the Amberd report found that Armenia does have export opportunities in the other direction. Armenia now exports raw fur, leather, and scrap metal to Turkey, and could export more products, including animals and freshwater fish.

“However, when building economic relations with a neighboring country, the main risk concerns Turkey’s cheap and high-quality agricultural and industrial products, which may flood the Armenian market. In this regard, it is very important to take into account the issue of Armenia’s food security,” the report says.

Also complicating decision-making are the heightened emotions associated with Turkey, and the deep political polarization in Armenia. In 2020, Armenia suffered a devastating military defeat to Azerbaijan, which was heavily backed by Turkey. That exacerbated Armenians’ long-standing fears of Turkey – which committed genocide against ethnic Armenians in 1915, which Ankara continues to officially deny – which Armenia’s political opposition exploits, painting any direct contact with Turkey as treason.

A recent survey found that 90 percent of Armenians see Turkey as their country’s greatest political threat, and 68 percent as its greatest economic threat. Asked about how they saw the possibility of open borders and renewed transport ties with Turkey, 35 percent saw it as definitely or somewhat positive, while 53 percent perceived it was definitely or somewhat negative.

Some Armenian economists look warily to their north, where Turkish products dominate the Georgian market. In 2019, Turkey exported approximately $1.5 billion in goods to Georgia, but imported only $300 million, according to official Turkish statistics

Armenian business owners fear a repeat of that scenario, said Alexandr Grigoryan, an economist at the American University of Armenia and part of a group of scholars that has been carrying out research into Armenian businesspeople’s expectations vis-a-vis trade with Turkey. 

Armenian business fears “the threat of economic expansion from Turkey if the Turkish state begins to purposefully apply such an economic policy,” Grigoryan told Eurasianet. “In the case of such developments, the Armenian businessmen we interviewed expect the support of the Armenian state.”

Given the comparatively small size of Armenia’s economy, its importance to Turkey is likely to be local rather than national, said Guven Sak, the managing director of the Turkish think tank TEPAV. Armenia “is not a place that can be a source of growth for the Turkish economy on a national scale” but it could be “extremely beneficial” as a regional development project for border cities, Sak told Turkey’s Anadolu Agency. 

The Armenian government has not yet announced any plans to protect the country’s businesses in the event the Turkish border opens, and an Economy Ministry spokesperson told Eurasianet that it had not carried out any projections of possible impacts.

Following the 2020 war, Armenia imposed a ban on Turkish imports of consumer goods in protest of Turkey’s heavy backing of Azerbaijan. 

The import ban was lifted at the beginning of 2021, as Yerevan and Ankara began to take steps toward normalizing relationsappointing envoys and carrying out their first bilateral meetings in more than a decade. 

Direct flights between the two countries began on February 2, carried out by both FlyOne Armenia and Turkey’s Pegasus Air. There had been no direct flights since 2020 when AtlasGlobal, the last airline to fly the route, went bankrupt. 

The envoys met in Moscow in January and are scheduled to meet a second time in Vienna on February 26. Diplomatic progress is sure to be slow and there is no timetable for when, or even if, the border will open.

Armenian officials have generally tried to accentuate the potential gains from freer cross-border trade. 

“Maybe in a particular segment of the economy some goods will lose their competitiveness, but it will make you think about what new opportunities appear after the opening of the border,” Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said during an online press conference on January 24. 

A member of parliament from the ruling Civil Contract Party and close Pashinyan associate Khachatur Sukiasyan told reporters that Armenia could gain medical tourism from eastern Turkey.  

“I have already called on the medical centers of Yerevan and the city of Gyumri to improve their technologies and medical services, which, when the border is opened, will be used by Turkish citizens living at a distance of up to 200 kilometers from the Armenian border, because these services are not developed there,” Sukiasyan told reporters on January 17. 

Sukiasyan’s family is in fact already benefiting: His brother is a co-founder and board member of FlyOne Armenia, one of the carriers that started flying the Yerevan-Istanbul route. 

 

Arshaluis Mgdesyan is a journalist based in Yerevan.

Azerbaijan informs about return of human remains by Armenia

Save

Share

 19:39,

YEREVAN, 11 FEBRUARY, ARMENPRESS. Armenia has returned human remains to Azerbaijan through the mediation of the International Committee of the Red Cross, ARMENPRESS reports citing Azerbaijani media, Eldar Samedov, Deputy Head of the Working Group of the Azerbaijan State Commission on Prisoners of War, Hostages and Missing Persons Elmar Samedov informed.

“The remains were removed mainly from groundwater sites, so it is very difficult to get DNA samples from those remains. In the final stage, clear information will be provided on how many bodies there are,” Samedov said.

Azerbaijan Walks Back Plans to Erase Armenian Traces From Churches

Moscow Times
Feb. 8, 2022
Azerbaijan’s Ministry of Culture has responded to controversy
resulting from its earlier announcement that it intended to erase
Armenian inscriptions from churches located in territories the country
reclaimed as a result of the 2020 war against Armenia.
On February 7, the ministry published a statement addressing what it
called "reports circulated by some biased foreign mass media outlets
over the past few days." It emphasized that "Azerbaijan has always
been respectful of its historical and cultural heritage, regardless of
religious and ethnic origin."
Four days earlier, Minister of Culture Anar Karimov told a press
briefing that it would be forming a working group tasked with removing
“the fictitious traces written by Armenians on Albanian religious
temples.”
That referred to a theory, which has become prominent in Azerbaijan
but is dismissed by mainstream historians, that Armenian inscriptions
in churches on Azerbaijani territory were later additions to churches
built under Caucasian Albania, an ancient Christian kingdom that ruled
the territory that is today Azerbaijan.
The new statement reaffirmed that "a working group has been set up to
study this heritage" and that "[s]hould any falsifications be
identified, they will be documented with the participation of
international experts and presented to the international community."
But it did not mention removing any Armenian traces, as Karimov’s
earlier announcement did.
That news had attracted widespread criticism.
"We are deeply concerned by Azerbaijan's plans to remove Armenian
Apostolic inscriptions from churches. We urge the government to
preserve and protect places of worship and other religious and
cultural sites," the U.S. Commission on International Religious
Freedom tweeted, quoting its chair, Nadine Maenza.
TV Zvezda, a news outlet run by Russia’s Defense Ministry, published a
piece on February 8 in which it pointedly referred to the Dadivank
Monastery, in Azerbaijan’s Kelbajar region, as "one of the greatest
monasteries of medieval Armenia." A 2,000-strong Russian peacekeeping
contingent is currently stationed in Karabakh. In earlier comments,
Karimov had claimed that the monastery was Albanian.
After an initial period of conspicuous silence, Armenia’s Foreign
Ministry issued a statement on February 8 condemning Karimov’s
comments: "It once again demonstrates the fact that the cases of
vandalism and destruction of the Armenian historical, cultural and
religious heritage in Nagorno-Karabakh during the 44-day war and the
following period, are deliberate and pre-planned, and are part of the
policy of annihilating Nagorno-Karabakh’s indigenous Armenian
population."
The announcement occasioned widespread public anger among Armenians.
“It's time to take the government of Azerbaijan at its word when it
says it intends to erase all traces of Armenians beginning with their
churches and ancient heritage sites,” wrote Elyse Semerdjian, a
professor of Middle Eastern history at Whitman College, on Twitter.
In Azerbaijan, meanwhile, there has been near silence around the news.
Pro-government media, which in comparable cases often actively
publicizes plans announced by the government, barely covered the
announcement or responses to criticism of it. Commentators and
activists, pro-government or otherwise, devoted little attention to
it.
A rare exception was Javid Agha, a social media commentator who
researches Caucasian Albanian heritage in Azerbaijan, speculated that
the plan may have been motivated by corruption, which is endemic in
Azerbaijan.
“There is no logic behind it. No tourist will come to see barren
churches, Azerbaijanis won’t care about it, nobody will applaud the
government for it from outside. Just another excuse to write some
checks,” Agha tweeted.
 

“Who needs Lukashenka?” – Yerevan responds to Belarusian President’s anti-Armenian statement


Feb 9 2022


  • JAMnews
  • Yerevan

President Lukashenka’s criticism of Armenia

Another scandalous statement by the President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenka has become the main topic of discussions in Armenia. His words – “Armenia has nowhere to run. Do you think anyone cares about them?” were discussed both on social media and in parliament. Press secretary of the Foreign Ministry Vahan Hunanyan also commented on it:

“We are convinced that the peculiar geopolitical analysis of the President of Belarus aims to serve, first of all, his own domestic political agenda and has nothing to do with Armenia and its foreign policy”.


  • “Russia ousted the West from the South Caucasus” – former co-chair of the OSCE Minsk Group
  • IRI polls in Armenia: “Turkey and Azerbaijan are a threat to Armenia’s security”
  • What is the right strategy for Armenia, stuck between the foreign policy ambitions of Russia and Turkey?

“Armenia has nowhere to run. Do you think anyone cares about them? They have already seen it… Nikol Vovayevich [Pashinyan, Prime Minister of Armenia] saw it [meaning the defeat in the war in Karabakh].”

This was the answer of the President of Belarus to a question about the prospects for the Russia-Belarus union state and the accession of other countries of the former USSR to it in an interview with Russian journalist Vladimir Solovyov.

“Azerbaijan is out of this cohort, we made a lot of mistakes there. This is a separate conversation. And, of course, Turkey very seriously supports Azerbaijan. Roads, gas, oil go through Turkey… And Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Tajikistan, due to their economic necessity, I think that they will also join”, Alexander Lukashenka said.

A member of the ruling Civil Contract faction, Vagharshak Hakobyan, said that the statements of the President of Belarus are “inadmissible” and are not appropriate for the head of state:

“The leader of the partner state [Armenia and Belarus are members of the Eurasian Economic Union and the military bloc of the Collective Security Treaty Organization operating under the auspices of Russia] has no right to express such thoughts to other partner countries. And I want to remind you who needed Armenia during the recent events in Kazakhstan. I am sure that Mr. Lukashenka understands better than anyone who needs the Republic of Armenia”.


  • CSTO Security Council meeting: threat to Kazakhstan or the CSTO?
  • “CSTO military contingent went to Kazakhstan, but never came to Armenia”

Another member of the ruling party, deputy Rustam Bakoyan also commented on the matter:

“Who needs Lukashenka? I think this rhetorical question was asked by his people. And the processes that took place in this country are a clear assessment of the stage of his reign, the state that he kept his country in and what came of it.

According to another member of the ruling party, Hovik Agazaryan, “Lukashenko and Margarita Simonyan [editor-in-chief of the Russian RT agency] are doing the Russian authorities a disservice by such actions”.

Russia and Belarus signed an agreement on the creation of a union state back in 1999. It provides for unified legislation and parliament, a common currency and state symbols.

After the presidential elections in Belarus in 2020, the results of which caused massive protest, Russia began to speed up negotiations on the formation of a union state. Negotiations on integration intensified even more after Lukashenka managed to suppress protests against his power.

In the begining of 2022, Lukashenka again made a statement about the union state:

“I must tell you that this year will not be easy. The world will change in a major way. The world will change in terms of uniting peoples and states into unions. It will not only be difficult for states like us to survive alone, it will be impossible”.

And a few days after that, speaking at the CSTO online summit, Lukashenka said that this military bloc should be strengthened without looking at the West or individual Western states:

“If we keep looking around, we will break our necks. Therefore, you need to attend to your own issues and see your own safety. When they have the slightest problem, they do not think about democracy, do not look back at us, but act in accordance with their own interests. We need to take that into account too”.

According to political observer Hakob Badalyan, Armenian society is inspired by sharp responses in the spirit of “Lukashenko, who are you? We are the masters of our country”. But he believes that Armenia gave rise to statements similar to Lukashenka’s attack:

“Let’s admit that the course of our country over the past three decades, unfortunately, has given and is giving Lukashenka or Lukashenkas the opportunity to say what they say”.

Badalyan says that nothing will change with the answers given to Lukashenka’s statement, instead of words, things in the country should be put in order, only this will change the image of Armenia, its potential and attitude towards it.

“Let’s treat not treat our state as a “laid table” that lacks a toastmaster, but as a complex organism in need of functional harmonization”.

According to Hakob Badalyan, “Lukashenko is here today, he will be gone tomorrow”, and in Armenia they should understand what is happening with the country now and what it should be like tomorrow.

Central Bank of Armenia: exchange rates and prices of precious metals – 04-02-22

Save

Share

 17:24, 4 February, 2022

YEREVAN, 4 FEBUARY, ARMENPRESS. The Central Bank of Armenia informs “Armenpress” that today, 4 February, USD exchange rate down by 0.67 drams to 481.63 drams. EUR exchange rate up by 7.91 drams to 552.19 drams. Russian Ruble exchange rate up by 0.04 drams to 6.34 drams. GBP exchange rate down by 0.38 drams to 653.52 drams.

The Central Bank has set the following prices for precious metals.

Gold price down by 208.41 drams to 27759.53 drams. Silver price down by 6.99 drams to 346.24 drams. Platinum price down by 192.67 drams to 15887.37 drams.