ADL should not redefine genocide

ADL should not redefine genocide

By Tom Mountain – Sunday September 12 2007

The police and civilian mob came for them in the night, forcing them
at gunpoint into the streets, stripping them of their property on the
spot before shipping them to internment camps for expulsion. The lucky
ones were put in boxcars, but most had to trudge on foot for hundreds
of miles under the watchful eyes of sadistic guards that tormented
their every step. The guards beat them mercilessly, shooting the
stragglers, raping the women. Those with hidden jewels or money could
get food, the rest starved. Death to exhaustion, disease and exposure
was rampant.
Already brutalized by the ravages of a long world war that destroyed
their homes and livelihoods, the captives were dragged from the towns
and villages they’d known for centuries to distant lands, leaving
behind a trail of misery and death.
No one knows for sure how many millions suffered the long marches, or
how many died as a result. Statistics weren’t kept, but the best
estimate is between 500,000 and 1.1 million deaths. That’s in addition
to the 300,000 to 600,000 killed during the bombings.
Yet these many decades later, the perpetrators still won’t acknowledge
that they committed genocide. And the victims still wait.
The Armenian tragedy?
No, the aforementioned atrocities occurred during the German tragedy
in the aftermath of World War II, between 1945 and 1950, when at least
a dozen European countries murdered, robbed, brutalized and expelled
their German citizens. Every liberated country, from Holland to
Romania, was culpable. Hungary deported most of its Germans by
December 1945. The Czechs rounded up and expelled nearly 2 million,
killing about 200,000 in the process. The Poles forced thousands of
Germans out of East Prussia by boat; they ended up in internment camps
in Denmark where 13,000 died, including 7,000 children.
If the German tragedy sounds eerily similar to the Armenian tragedy,
it is. True, the German nation was the aggressor in World War II, but
the Soviets and Eastern Europeans killed hundreds of thousands of
German civilians under the (correct) assumption that they had been
fifth column during the war – enemy combatants that posed a threat
from within, just as the Armenians were to the Turks in World War I.
The Armenians of eastern Turkey, primarily Anatolia, allied themselves
with Britain, France and Russia against the Ottoman Empire. Over
150,000 joined the Russian Army and fought against the Turks on the
Caucasus Front, in the area of present day eastern Turkey and Armenia.
The Anatolian Armenians openly rebelled against Ottoman rule, staged a
guerilla war, then conspired with and fought alongside the Russians as
the Tsarist army invaded eastern Turkey. This led to the decision by
the Turkish government to quell the Armenian revolt, defeat the
guerillas and, finally, expel the Armenians, thus causing the deaths
of hundreds of thousands through famine, exposure, disease and murder
at the hands of Turks, Kurds, and Circassians.
Yet the intent of the Turkish government was expulsion, not
extermination. And only from those eastern provinces where Armenians
were deemed a security threat. The other tens of thousands of
Armenians who lived throughout the Ottoman Empire were left alone.
The European nations had to wait until Germany was defeated in 1945
before they could expel the German civilians among them, which they
proceeded to do with a vengeance. The number of Germans killed by
Eastern European countries equaled – and may have even surpassed – the
number of Armenians killed by the Turks. And yet most of us today have
never heard of the German tragedy because nations and humanitarian
organizations are not clamoring to declare it genocide.
Nor are the Germans demanding that their unique tragedy be declared a
genocide. But they could. In fact, based on the Armenian precedent,
they ought to. As of now, the Germans have every right to expect the
Anti-Defamation League to declare the German tragedy a genocide, just
as they did for the Armenians. At a minimum, the ADL, as a human
rights organization whose latest gimmick is expanding the category of
genocide, is morally obligated to explain to the Germans why their
1945 to 1950 tragedy doesn’t qualify as genocide, despite the glaring
similarities to the Armenian tragedy, especially the hundreds of
thousands killed during mass expulsions.
By their foolishness in caving in to the Armenians, thus redefining
genocide, the ADL has opened a Pandora’s Box, paving the way for
countless victimized nations to expect the same consideration for
their own historical tragedies.
Even the Germans.

Source: columnists/mountain/?content_id=3659

http://www.thejewishadvocate.com/this_weeks_issue/

Ahmadinejad prevented from visiting Ground Zero

Panorama.am

19:05 22/09/2007

Ahmadinejad prevented from visiting Ground Zero

New York city officials have prohibited Iranian
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad from visiting Ground
Zero. This is what Americans call the place where the
International Trade Center was located. Ahmadinejad,
who is to speak at the United Nations General
Assembly, had expressed the desire to lay a wreath in
honor of those who perished on September 11, 2001.
Discussing this question, city police officials
decided that it would be impossible to guarantee the
Iranian president’s safety should he visit the site.
The White House assured it had no influence on the
decision by police. American president George Bush was
more blunt, saying in reality the police didn’t want
the leader of a terrorist state to visit Ground Zero.
In his turn, Ahmadinejad said that all he wanted to do
was lay a wreath in honor of the victims, but that he
hadn’t insisted that this be part of his visit to the
USA. We remind that permission to enter the USA was
given so the Iranian president and his delegation
could particpate at the General Assembly meeting, but
their movement in the city is limited. They are
limited to a radius of 25 miles from the meeting
place.

Source: Panorama.am

Anand Leads Despite Draw Against Gelfand

ANAND LEADS DESPITE DRAW AGAINST GELFAND

Zee News
September 22, 2007
India

Mexico City, Sept 22: World`s numero uno chess player Viswanathan
Anand took a pause as he played a very short draw against Israeli
grand master Boris Gelfand and kept his half a point lead intact in
the World Chess Championships in Mexico City.

In the eighth round yesterday, Gelfand, with white may have entertained
some thoughts of upsetting the Indian grand master, but there was
chance in the Catalan opening, which was soon.

Neutralised by Anand, who has undoubtedly become the sentimental
favourite of Mexican chess fans.

In this short 20 moves game, Anand decided to get out of the cramped
position (13th move) and to play freely, but he quickly realised that
it was not right time as Gelfand kept on developing the pieces and
got a small advantage.

But despite of the advantage, there was nothing much for the Israeli
grand master as well as for Anand, and it eventually prompted both
the players to settle for a draw.

Anand said, "I was able to use a new idea that I had worked with
in may with Sandeepan and it was a sort of surprise, it was not a
complete novelty but it is a rare move. I am happy that I was able
to equalise and finish it in 20 moves."

After a days rest, the NIIT-baked Indian will have white pieces
against Armenian grand master Levon Aronian in the ninth round of
the tournament.

Meanwhile, two other games of the eighth round — between Peter Svidler
and Vladimir Kramnik and Alexander Morozevich and Levon Aronian —
also ended in a tame draw.

However, the last game of the round saw peter Leko clinching his first
victory of the tournament against Alexander Grischuk in a long battle
that lasted over 60 moves.

The Imagination Of A Real Armenian Is Really Bright

THE IMAGINATION OF A REAL ARMENIAN IS REALLY BRIGHT
NAIRA KHACHATRYAN

Hayoc Ashkharh
21 Sept 2007

They Want To Get Up And See Magic

Member of "Bargavach Hayastan" parliamentary faction Vardan
Bostanjyan hosted "Urbat" club yesterday.

The MP firstly evaluated the work of their fraction during the
first four days in the Parliament," I would like to evaluate our entry
in the activity of the National Assembly as "good". It is too early to
speak about professionalism, in terms of discipline I must mention
that unlike previous times all the MPs have been present during the
sessions and that their activity hasn’t been limited only by being
present in the sittings they had active participation in the
discussions as well. "
As for the legislative initiatives submitted by Bargavach Hayastan
Party (BHP), they are various and they need discussion within the
coalition frameworks.
"We need time to coordinate those issues: as for example which
initiatives must be implemented by the coalition and which – by the
two powerful fractions, by the members of the coalition memorandum of
the parties having shared the first and the second places.
As we know the Republican and Dashnaktsutyun parties have already
announced about their intentions to stand for the presidential
elections with their personal candidate. What about BHP? In response
to this question V. Bostanjyan said," From the beginning ARF policy
was to run for the elections with their own candidate. As for the
members of the coalition memorandum RPA and BHP, according to the
functions of the memorandum we must have a united candidate and
support the united candidate."
Naturally coalition candidate has big chances," At least at this
stage the Prime Minister is a powerful candidate," the MP underscored.
Regarding the rumors about Levon Ter-Petrosyan’s possible
nomination V. Bostanjyan said," As people say when you sow "if" it
never grows. In my view there should be rivalry a there should be a
civilized, democratic rivalry, which will be manifested by the number
of the votes this or that candidate will obtain. Everything is
possible in this world."
He said he doesn’t expect any results from the meetings by various
formats organized by the opposition leaders. He said," I wouldn’t like
to hurt our opposition leaders, but I don’t think they will show any
good results. Because during the previous years they have already
displayed that hardly can they introduce any solution to any issue. I
don’t see this in case of the existing opposition?"
Later on V. Bostanjyan gave his formulation of a constructive
opposition." Constructive opposition is the one the vector of the
activity of which is directed to raising the productiveness of any
sphere. It can be state governance, supporting economic competition,
juridical-legislative system etc."
Regarding the parliamentary opposition he said," At least this
short period of parliamentary activity displayed that we lack
constructive opposition."
As for the legislative initiative about NKR recognition, submitted
by "Heritage" party he said, " If we are doing it we must first of all
think whether or not the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of
Nagorno Karabakh will benefit from it. At this stage when we are in
the process of the mediation of international organizations, in my
opinion it is an illogical step." The speaker said the initiative is
simply before time.

Vanderbilt’s Holocaust Lecture Series marks 30th year

Vanderbilt University News, TN

News from Vanderbilt University

Vanderbilt’s Holocaust Lecture Series marks 30th year;
2007 theme is ‘Broken Silence’

9-20-2007

The longest running Holocaust Lecture Series at an American university
marks its 30th year with lectures and films this October and November
spanning subjects from the life of children in Nazi Germany to
genocide in Iraq and ethnic cleansing in the United States.

`The theme of `Broken Silence’ for this year’s series reaffirms our
long-standing commitment to expand the frontiers of our conversation
about the Holocaust and other genocides by providing a stage for new
perspectives, new questions and for conveying those narratives that
have struggled to find a voice or an audience,’ said the co-chairs of
the planning committee for the series, Shaiya Baer and Irek
Kusmierczyk. `Hence, in these lectures, we will listen to the voices
of victimized Jews as well as Kurds and Armenians, and, in the
process, we find the courage to confront the question of racial
cleansing on American soil.’

The schedule of events, all free and open to the public:

7 p.m. Sunday, Oct. 14, in Sarratt Cinema `The Skeleton in Our Closet:
Misremembering America’s Racial Cleansings’ Journalist Elliot Jaspin,
a Pulitzer Prize winner, speaks about episodes in America after
Reconstruction until the Great Depression where organized groups of
white people terrorized, murdered and forced thousands of black
Americans to flee their homes. Jaspin is the author of Buried in
Bitter Waters: The Hidden History of Racial Cleansing in America.

7 p.m. Wednesday, Oct. 17, in the Moore Room of Vanderbilt Law School
`The Iraq Genocide: Personal Perspectives and Legal Residue’ Michael
Newton, acting associate professor of clinical law, was in Kurdish
camps as citizens fled to the mountains in 1991 amongst the
destruction of villages by Saddam Hussein. Newton will discuss the
political and legal salience of the subsequent Iraqi High Tribunal,
where he served as an international law adviser to the judges. He will
highlight the perspective of the victims in the context of Iraqi
society.

7 p.m. Sunday, Oct. 28, in The Ben Schulman Center for Jewish Life
`Deep Evil and Deep Good: The Concept of Human Nature Confronts the
Holocaust’ Michael Bess, the Chancellor’s Professor of History, speaks
about the sometimes atrocious and sometimes noble actions of Europeans
touched by the persecution of Jews by Nazi Germany. He will examine
the strategies that have been followed by historians, psychologists,
social scientists and philosophers to explain the chasm between those
who tried to help and those who took part in the persecution.

7 p.m. Thursday, Nov. 1, in Flynn Auditorium of Vanderbilt Law School
`Children of Hitler’s War’ Nicholas Stargardt, a fellow at Magdalen
College, Oxford, discusses the role of children under Nazi Germany
rule. He is the author of Witnesses of War: Children’s Lives under the
Nazis.

7 p.m. Monday, Nov. 5, in 103 Wilson Hall `The Years of Extermination:
An Integrated History of the Holocaust’ Saul Friedländer, holder of
the 1939 Club Chair at the University of California, Los Angeles, says
he `will argue for an essential need to integrate the fate of
individuals, both Jews and non-Jews alike, within the general history
of the Holocaust.’ Friedländer is the author of Nazi Germany and
the Jews, 1939-1945: The Years of Extermination.

6 p.m. Thursday, Nov. 15, in 126 Wilson Hall `The Armenian Genocide’
Andrew Goldberg directed and produced this one-hour documentary about
the first genocide of the 20th century, when more than a million
Armenians were killed by Ottoman Turks in 1915. The film will be
followed by a 7 p.m. reception in the lobby of Wilson Hall, and then a
7:35 p.m. lecture by Peter Balakian on `The Transmission of Trauma
Across Generations: Writing a Memoir about Growing Up in the Suburbs
and the Armenian Genocide.’

Selected events will be recorded and posted as podcasts to VUCast, the
Web site of Vanderbilt News Service, at

The Vanderbilt University Holocaust Lecture Series was started in 1977
by Beverly Asbury, the university chaplain.

Media Contact: Jim Patterson, (615) 322-NEWS
[email protected]

www.vanderbilt.edu/news.

Seven Projects To Participate In Competition Of Short Films ‘Toleran

SEVEN PROJECTS TO PARTICIPATE IN COMPETITION OF SHORT FILMS ‘TOLERANCE WITHOUT BORDERS’

ArmInfo
2007-09-18 21:42:00

Seven projects have been selected to participate in a competition
of short films "Tolerance without Borders". To recall, preference
was given to those projects, which focus on religious, racial and
ethnic tolerance.

Maria Mirzoyan, the program coordinator of the "Golden Apricot"
Fund for Cinema Development told ArmInfo correspondent that the
participants in the competition are: David Matevosyan ("Lullaby"
project), Jivan Avetisyan ("Unfinished Story"), Lev Oganesyan ("A
Grandpa Frost for My Grandma"), Gor Baghdasaryan ("Playground"),
Mikayel Gevorgyan ("Shadows of the Caucasus Mountains"), Nika Shek
("From Culture to Tolerance"), and Seda Muradyan ("Home from Home").

According to M.Mirzoyan, the winners will be awarded next week. The
"Golden Apricot" Fund for Cinema Development and OSCE will allocate 1
500 EUR for 2 projects each, and UNDP – 5 thsd EUR for 1 project. To
note, the competition is being held within the framework of the "
Directors without Borders" program.

BAKU: Meeting Of GUAM Experts Begins In Baku

MEETING OF GUAM EXPERTS BEGINS IN BAKU

TREND
18.09.2007 16:37:56

Azerbaijan, Baku /corr. Trend S.Agayeva / Experts from Foreign
Ministries of the ‘Organization for Democracy and Economic Development
– GUAM’ participating countries came together in Baku on 18 September
to coordinate technical issues for the next meeting of the Council
of National Coordinators and Council of GUAM Foreign Ministers.

All GUAM countries ( Georgia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan and Moldova) attended
the meeting, according to the Foreign Ministry of Azerbaijan. The
experts should coordinate the agenda of the seventh meeting of the
Council of National Coordinators due on 20-22 September in Baku and
the fourth meeting of the Council of Foreign Ministers which will take
during the 62nd session of the UN General Assembly in New York. The
sides have not confirmed the date of the Foreign Ministers meeting.

The 62nd session of the UN General Assembly is expected to cover the
results of the ‘frozen conflicts’, worldwide security and development,
issues for preventing armed confrontations and the situation in
occupied territories of Azerbaijan.

Earlier the Secretary General of GUAM, Valeri Chechelashvili, reported
to Trend that a project of resolution on lingering conflicts in GUAM
countries may be put forward for consideration by the UN General
Assembly at the beginning of September. A project for the resolution
regarding lingering conflicts in GUAM, in particular Dniester (
Moldova), Nagorno-Karabakh ( Azerbaijan) and Georgian-Abkhazian was
developed and included in the agenda of the UN General Assembly at
the end of 2006. Later, the representatives of GUAM removed the issue
from the agenda.

As an alternative to the CIS the four post-Soviet republics Georgia,
Ukraine, Azerbaijan and Moldova, established the GUAM format in 1999
during a summit of head of state of European Union member-countries
in Strasbourg. The summit of GUAM in Baku was the second one which
focused on the prospects of the development of the organization both
in the sphere of the economy and security.

Global Image Virtual Armenia

GLOBAL IMAGE VIRTUAL ARMENIA
Hakob Badalyan

Lragir.am
18-09-2007 12:21:42

The minister of trade and development of economy Nerses Yeritsyan
in office for 100 days, whose appointment was unanimously stated by
experts to be a sensible, unbiased, non-clannish policy, put forward
a new thesis which will describe the so-called second generation of
reforms: "Shaping the global image of Armenia." In other words, the
upcoming actions of the government will be directed at it. Certainly,
Nerses Yeritsyan spoke about the plans of his ministry but it is clear
that no global image of Armenia will be shaped without a consolidated
action of the government. Meanwhile, the doubts that the actions of
the Armenian executive are hardly consolidated are righteous. And not
only the actions. The actions are mere consequences, effect, expression
of thinking. The problem is the difference of views, ideas, perception.

Certainly, not only Nerses Yeritsyan upholds the necessity of modern
approaches, discussion and solution of problems in accordance with
the logic of the process and deep analysis of the phenomena. But I
very much doubt that many other members of government who speak about
it believe their own words. In addition, these members of government
are rather influential and occupy rather important posts. For them
the global image of Armenia is a big plantation where their slaves
toil and produce output for their masters. And the masters decide how
to divide the output. It is not even an image or an association but
a credo. And in this context the excited statements of the minister
of trade and development of economy what should be done to develop
Armenia and achieve a modern level of relations are doomed to shape
the governmental PR to show what intelligent ministers, experienced
specialists they have appointed to government.

Can Nerses Yeritsyan tell us what modern approach is needed to
solve the problem when one of the oligarchs cheats a medium-sized
businessman? Meanwhile, it is a true story when the medium-sized
business sells a product to one of the companies run by the oligarch,
and the company does not pay. Meanwhile, it is a matter of a few
million drams. The medium-sized businessman has no way of getting
the money because if he gets involved in a conflict, the number of
unrevealed murders in Armenia will increase by one, and if he chooses
a dispute at the court of law, the society will become convinced once
again that the judicial system in Armenia merely serves the strong.

I suggest that Nerses Yeritsyan and also the other members of
government who consider themselves as progressive and having a modern
thinking, go deep into the cause or causes of this phenomenon and
say how the medium-sized businesses can be protected from major
businesses, who and how should stop the oligarch hiding behind the
back of a high-ranking official from cheating, robbing and enslaving.

And if now there is someone who can stop the oligarch, why has he
failed so far and will he share responsibility for the wrongdoings
of the oligarch as well?

If we do not discuss to the point these definite episodes of our life
which are the present image of Armenia, if we do not refer to things
and phenomena with their names, if we avoid discussing and addressing
responsibility for the vicious phenomena in Armenia, the talks about
the new image are but a mere display of knowledge. In addition, in
this case this knowledge is displayed to hide, and also to justify
other’s ignorance.

UN Fund Approves Nearly $200 Million In Grants And Loans To Help Rur

UN FUND APPROVES NEARLY $200 MILLION IN GRANTS AND LOANS TO HELP RURAL POOR

UN News Centre
15 September 2007

14 September 2007 – The United Nations International Fund for
Agricultural Development (IFAD) announced that it has approved almost
$200 million in grants and loans to support initiatives to bolster
the living conditions of the rural poor in more than a dozen countries
in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Near East.

In West and Central Africa, IFAD will make $5.7 million in loans and
$15 million in grants available.

Some 28,000 farmers in the Woleu-Ntem province of Gabon will receive
funding to help diversify their incomes through the development and
marketing of new products form such staple crops as bananas, cassava
and peanuts.

In Guinea, a grant will help finance a project to bolster local
governance in rural areas while in Guinea-Bissau, one of the world’s
poorest nations, another grant will assist 100,000 rural people build
their communities through rehabilitating infrastructure and bolstering
grassroots organizations.

Lesotho, Uganda, Bangladesh, the Maldives, Pakistan, El Salvador,
Nicaragua, Armenia, Morocco and Yemen will also receive IFAD grants
or loans.

Additionally, the fund approved six grants to international centres
conducting agricultural research and development activities in rural
areas in poor nations.

IFAD supports nearly 200 ongoing rural poverty eradication programmes
and projects, worth $6 billion, to reach 82 million rural poor people
worldwide.

New Level In Russia-Karabakh Relations

NEW LEVEL IN RUSSIA-KARABAKH RELATIONS

KarabakhOpen
14-09-2007 12:48:29

A group of Russian politicians, civil society activists, writers
and journalists led by the head of the Society of Russian-Armenian
Friendship and Cooperation Victor Krivopuskov is visiting Karabakh. On
September 13 they met with President Bako Sahakyan. The necessity
for shifting the Russia-Karabakh relations to a new level was pointed
out during the talk.

The guests handed out a memory medal to the president of Karabakh.