Oscars: Ukraine Enters ‘Parajanov’ In Foreign Language Race

OSCARS: UKRAINE ENTERS ‘PARAJANOV’ IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE RACE

hollywoodreporter.com
September 16, 2013 Monday

Vladimir Kozlov

MOSCOW — Ukraine has nominated a biopic on Soviet-era director Sergei
Paradjanov for the Academy Award in the foreign language film category.

Paradjanov, directed by first-time feature directors Olena Fetisova
and Serge Avedikian, who starred as the renowned director, was made
as a co-production between Ukraine, Georgia and Armenia – the three
countries in which Paradjanov worked – and France.

The Euro2 million biopic had its world premiere as part of the Karlovy
Vary Film Festival’s program East of West last July. It was later
screened at the Odessa International Film Festival and collected
the Golden Duke award for the best Ukrainian film. It had a general
Ukrainian release on Sept. 12.

“I believe that Paradjanov is more than a worthy Ukrainian entry in
the Oscar race,” Denis Rzhavsky, a member of the Ukrainian Committee,
said in a statement. “However, what made me glad was not the selection
of that film, but the quality and quantity of its competitors. It is
already clear that in 2014, we will have premieres that will change
audiences’ perceptions of the Ukrainian cinema.”

Paradjanov, an ethnic Armenian born and raised in Georgia, came
to prominence with his 1965 historic drama Tini zabutykh predkiv
(Shadows of the Forgotten Ancestors), which collected the Critics
Grand Prize and the Special Jury Award at the Mar del Plata Film
Festival and was released in more than a dozen countries.

However, despite the international success, Paradjanov was soon banned
from filmmaking by Soviet ideologues and later thrown into prison on
what is widely believed to be fabricated charges and spent several
years behind bars.

After being released, he made three more features, Ambavi Suramis
tsikhitsa (The Legend of the Suram Fortress) and Ashug-Karibi (The
Hoary Legends of the Caucasus), and died in 1990.

Yerevan In The Grip Of Geopolitical Poles (The First Round Of The Fi

YEREVAN IN THE GRIP OF GEOPOLITICAL POLES (THE FIRST ROUND OF THE FIGHT)

Vestnik Kavkaza, Russia
Sept 17 2013

17 September 2013 – 12:35pm

Susanna Petrosyan, Yerevan. Exclusively to Vestnik Kavkaza

Serge Sargsyan’s statement on Armenia’s intention to join the Customs
Union (CU) didn’t halt the geopolitical process over Armenia.

Discussions on the course of development continue there.

According to the head of the Institute of the Caucasus, Alexander
Iskandaryan, Armenia cannot really join the Customs Union and the
absence of borders is not the main problem: “The CU was established
for Kazakhstan and Russia, and their interests and demands contradict
Armenia’s needs. For example, Kazakhstan and Russia produce and export
energy products; Armenia imports them. Moreover, the countries of the
CU and Armenia not only have no common borders, but also between us
there is Georgia, which is a very specific country for Russia.

Furthermore, these are thousands of pages of texts which have been
developing for years. All these norms cannot be simply applied to
Armenia.”

The question of the possibility of combining membership of Armenia
in the CU and initialling of the association agreement within the EU
program of the Eastern Partnership is in the focus of attention. The
European Commissioner for Enlargement and European Neighbourhood
Policy, Stefan Fule, has already stated that in the context of
Armenia’s statement on joining the CU, it is difficult to imagine the
association agreement with the EU being initialled on November 29th
in Vilnius. According to him, there is a problem of compatibility
between obligations to the CU and the free trade area with the
EU. “For example, you cannot simultaneously reduce customs rates, as is
required by the Agreement on a deep and comprehensive free trade area,
and increase them as a lresult of membership in the Customs Union,”
Fule thinks. The possibility of the other document – the Association
Agreement – being initialled by Armenia is also excluded.

However, considering the fact that the geopolitical competition
between Russia and the West for the post-Soviet space won’t stop
due to the decision of Yerevan to join the CU, and Armenia wasn’t
included in the program of “Eastern Partnership” accidentally,
it could be predicted that the Europeans will try to find another
option for settlement of the problem that has occurred. For example,
in the future a new document for Armenia can be developed.

A small country with numerous problems in the economic sphere,
constant migration, having a conflict with Azerbaijan and difficult
relations with Turkey is involved in an argument between two leading
centers of political force – Russia and the West. In the first round
of the fight Moscow won, which has such trump cards as providing the
security of Armenia, exporting gas to Armenia and the presence of a
million Armenian migrants in Russia. The EU, and the West in general,
has never been interested in the security problems of Armenia.

To be continued.

http://vestnikkavkaza.net/articles/economy/45194.html

Latest Act Of Handing Over State Staged In Moscow

LATEST ACT OF HANDING OVER STATE STAGED IN MOSCOW

Hakob Badalyan
Comments – Tuesday, 17 September 2013, 22:10

The Customs Union of Government and Church In Moscow the biggest
cathedral outside Armenia was opened. It has an administrative
building, a hotel, a dining hall. Whether the largeness or the Customs
Union was the reason, Serzh Sargsyan also attended the opening of the
church. The Armenian cathedral in Moscow was built with the donations
of “church-loving Armenians”. The Russia-based Armenian rich people
are meant. It is not clear what “church-loving” means. Do they love
the church as a building or as a religious institution? If the answer
is religious institution, I wonder how these “church-loving Armenians”
imagine their role in the life of the nation where the state has de
jure been the key institution over two decades. However, in the second
decade of the state opening churches continues to be treated as a
national event, and huge churches continue to be built. In other
words, in the second decade of the state the Armenian people or
their political and business elite come together around cathedrals,
not secular institutions of the state. The same thing took place in
Armenia when Gagik Tsarukyan built a huge church in Abovyan where the
government and opposition prayed side by side. This is touching indeed
but the Armenian people, the citizens of Armenia and the Diaspora, as
a potential subject of global competition, need secular institutions
providing premises for development rather than touching scenes. They
need institutions where unity is not a physical act involving
people coming together at a place and smiling to each other or at
least not swearing at each other but a process involving discussion,
criticism and opposition that leads to generation of ideas and contains
mechanisms of recognition of its result, capable of legitimacy. The
state is the most viable and competitive model of national unity,
whereas Armenians continue to subject the state, sometimes subtly,
sometimes roughly, to the church. This causes mutation of both
the state and church. As a result, neither of them develops and is
modernized to suit the time. Meanwhile, the consequences of the problem
are acknowledged. The problem has nothing to do with the modernization
of the state or the church. Or it is related to the extent when
modernization itself supposes new requirements and criteria for the
“church-loving Armenians” in Armenia and the worldwide Armenians and
the society. The “church-loving Armenians” have not reached the mental
and moral level needed for those criteria, therefore modernization
exposes them to danger because it may raise essentially the level
of society’s requirements and disturb the atmosphere of tolerance,
leading to new requirements for the elites.

The goal is to maintain the current level at the cost of stagnation of
the church and using the church as a private or group lifebelt. The
problem is clear – the society must not hinder the “church-loving
Armenians” to determine their own destinies. When the state is
attending this issue, questions occur which require answers.

Meanwhile, over the past decades or centuries the Armenian Apostolic
Church has become a mechanism of avoidance of concrete answers, which
is lying at the heart of the lucrative deal between the government
and the church. Logically, the role and importance of the belt is
growing in Moscow where the destinies of “church-loving elites” are
determined. Since the church replaces the state de facto as a leading
institution, it means adjusting itself to the de facto structure of
the state where Moscow has reiterated its role of destiny shaper. The
church is one of the key symbols of this reality, and Moscow’s role
would be psychologically weak unless it is enriched with one of the
key symbols of the reality.

http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/30908

Russian State Duma To Discuss Armenia’S ‘Application’ For Customs Un

RUSSIAN STATE DUMA TO DISCUSS ARMENIA’S ‘APPLICATION’ FOR CUSTOMS UNION MEMBERSHIP SOON – EXPERT

21:39 17.09.13

The Russian State Duma will soon hold a meeting to discuss Armenia’s
“application” for membership in the Customs Union, Chairman of the
Union of Political Scientists of Armenia Hmayak Hovhannisyan told
Tert.am.

According to him, the “application” is Armenian President Serzh
Sargsyan’s “word” said publicly following his meeting with his
Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin, which is tantamount to a written
application. “A word spoken is past recalling,” Hovhannisyan said. The
rest is technicalities, he added.

According to the established procedure, the Armenian president’s
“application” is to be discussed and approved by the parliaments of
the Customs Union member-states.

“It will take several months because it has been said that Armenia
may become a Customs Union member next may. The National Assembly is
supposed to approve that package of bills, which is not a problem. The
parliamentary force led by President Serzh Sargsyan constitutes a
decision-making majority. That is, no problems can be expected. Let
alone the fact that none of the political forces, except for the
5-member Heritage parliamentary group, has spoken against Armenia’s
accession to the Customs Union,” the expert said.

With respect to the fact that Armenia has no common borders with any
of the Customs Union member-states, Hovhannisyan said: “Why should we
be concerned over the matter if your website interviewed the economist
Mikael Melkumyan, who explained the situation. I said the same as a
political scientist.”

Both Melkumyan and Hovhannisyan stressed the fact that Armenia,
Georgia, Russia and all the Customs Union member-states signed the
Convention on International Transport of Goods Under Cover of TIR
Carnets (TIR Convention).

“And goods cross the Georgian border without any customs clearance.

Russian goods come to Armenia through Georgia. What problems may
arise?”

Armenian News – Tert.am

Over 500 Communities In Armenia Connected To Gas Network In 11 Years

OVER 500 COMMUNITIES IN ARMENIA CONNECTED TO GAS NETWORK IN 11 YEARS

YEREVAN, September 17. / ARKA /. Armenia’s Russian-controlled natural
gas operator ArmRosgaprom (ARG) said it has connected 546 rural and
45 urban communities to natural gas network in 2002-2013, out of the
total 998 communities.

“We have now 644,448 subscribers connected to the network – 345,547
in multi-apartment buildings and 298,901 in privately-owned homes,”
the company said.

Prior to 1993, Armenia had 388 communities with 485,000
households connected to the network. -0- – See more at:

http://arka.am/en/news/economy/over_500_communities_in_armenia_connected_to_gas_network_in_11_years/#sthash.wYplvdpA.dpuf

ARF Launches "We Will Live In Our Country" Program

ARF LAUNCHES “WE WILL LIVE IN OUR COUNTRY” PROGRAM

September 17, 2013 | 12:29

YEREVAN. – Armenia’s opposition ARF Dashnaktsutyun Party is starting
the “We will Live in Our Country” program, whose objective is to stop
emigration from the country.

ARF Supreme Body member and ARF National Assembly Faction leader Armen
Rustamyan noted the aforesaid during a press conference on Tuesday.

He stressed that stopping emigration forthwith is indispensable for
Armenia’s future.

“Proceeding from this, the ARF is working on this program for several
months; we have held serious discussions. Now, it is necessary to
start a new phase, a new stage,” Rustamyan said.

He noted that emigration is a complex problem, and the problems that
cause emigration need to be addressed. As per the opposition MP,
Armenia’s present-day political system does not enable to address
these problems immediately, and the reason is the, “similitude of
the ruling party and the state.”

“We are losing blood, and we cannot allow it to result in a complete
blood loss. And the organism is our country, our state, our homeland,”
Rustamyan stated.

He noted that it will be wrong to wait for the materialization of
the plan for a power change, and that is why it is necessary to
take priority steps. As per Armen Rustamyan, ARF Dashnaktsutyun
has summarized all this in seven points, and the latter are the
“prescription” for solving the accumulated problems.

Photo by Arsen Sargsyan/NEWS.am

News from Armenia – NEWS.am

Quake In Georgia Felt In Northern Armenian Provinces

QUAKE IN GEORGIA FELT IN NORTHERN ARMENIAN PROVINCES

NEWS | 17.09.13 | 11:45

An earthquake registered in Georgia today was felt on a minor scale in
some northern provinces of Armenia, reports the Ministry of Emergency
Situations of Armenia.

The Seismic Protection Service of Armenia received information on
a magnitude 5 earthquake registered in the territory of Georgia at
8:09 am. The epicenter of the earthquake was 102 kilometers to the
west of capital Tbilisi (measuring 6-7 in the epicenter).

In Armenia’s territory the earthquake was felt in the towns of
Noyemberyan and Ijevan (as 3 points).

No victims or destruction has been reported.

http://armenianow.com/news/48533/armenia_earthquake_georgia_northern_provinces

Un Experts Armenien Defend Le Paraphe De L’accord D’association Avec

UN EXPERTS ARMENIEN DEFEND LE PARAPHE DE L’ACCORD D’ASSOCIATION AVEC L’UE

ARMENIE

Le directeur de l’Institut du Caucase base a Erevan a defendu le
paraphe de l’accord d’association approfondi et complet de Zone de
libre-echange (DCFTA) de l’UE avec l’Armenie, en disant que cela aura
un impact positif sur l’economie de l’Armenie.

L’Armenie et plusieurs autres ex-republiques sovietiques sont censes
signes des accords en Novembre lors du sommet du Partenariat oriental
de l’UE un qui doit avoir lieu a Vilnius, en Lituanie.

S’exprimant lors d’une conference de presse Alexandre Iskandaryan a
dit que le paraphe des accords est juste une etape sur le chemin de
l’Armenie vers l’integration europeenne, et donc aucun changement
fondamental et immediat dans l’economie nationale ne doit etre prevu.

Selon l’UE, les accords permettront a l’Armenie de recevoir un
revenu annuel supplementaire de 146 millions d’euros, près de 2,3%
de son PIB. Les exportations de l’Armenie peuvent croître de 15,2%
et les importations de 8,2%. Cet accord permettra a l’Armenie de
diversifier ses exportations a des conditions favorables.

mardi 17 septembre 2013, Stephane ©armenews.com

Russia Will Supply Another Batch Of Arms To Azerbaijan

RUSSIA WILL SUPPLY ANOTHER BATCH OF ARMS TO AZERBAIJAN

Kurgan Machine Construction Plant has launched production of 2C31 Vena
self-propelled artillery units for Azerbaijan, arm-expo.ru informs.

Vena System was introduced in 1997 but no clients were found then.

Azerbaijan is the first client of 18 2C31 Vena self-propelled
artillery units.

Vena is intended for infantry, artillery and mortar units, missile
systems, armored targets, fire units and control centers over a
distance of 13km. It is equipped with a tracker intended for both day
and night time, carry out super-precision fire in any weather and at
time of the day or night over long distances.

16:44 16/09/2013 Story from Lragir.am News:

http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/politics/view/30898

ISTANBUL: Russia plays, Europe pays: Armenia’s Customs Union adventu

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
Sept 15 2013

Russia plays, Europe pays: Armenia’s Customs Union adventure (1)

ZAUR SHIRIYEV
[email protected]

Armenian President Serzh Sarksyan’s declaration that Yerevan will join
the Russian-led Customs Union (CU) has unseated an enduring and
continuing debate both domestically and internationally.

Undoubtedly, the decision has come as a surprise to the wider public
— but not to high-level European Union officials. As stated by EU
Commissioner for Enlargement and European Neighborhood Policy Stefan
Füle, Armenia only informed the EU about the possibility of its
accession to the CU on Aug. 31, just three days before the official
declaration of the decision. It seems likely that President Sarksyan
made his final decision during an unexpected visit to Croatia on Aug.
28, where he met with Ara Abrahamyan, a Russian-Armenian businessman
and president of the Union of Russian Armenians. According to
speculation in the Armenian media, Abrahamyan arranged for Sarksyan to
meet with Putin, and while still in Croatia, Sarksyan notified the EU
of his decision.

What is now clear is that an EU Association Agreement is no longer on
the table with Yerevan at the November Vilnius Summit. Armenia’s
decision will have important consequences for both the EU and the
South Caucasus region.

>From the EU’s perspective, Armenia has ended its `either-or’ dilemma
between the EU and the Russian-sponsored CU and Eurasian Union. On
Sept. 12, the European Parliament passed a resolution proclaiming
Russia’s actions towards the Eastern Partnership (EaP) countries
`unacceptable,’ and called upon the European Commission to take
definite action. In reality, this resolution is merely a demonstration
of political frustration and is unlikely to influence Moscow’s
behavior. In another statement, the EU has said that it is trying to
draft a workable road map for EaP countries to finalize an agreement
with the EU while also meeting Moscow’s demands.

According to Füle, `it may certainly be possible for members of the
EaP to increase their cooperation with the CU, perhaps as observers;
and participation in Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA)
agreements is of course fully compatible with our partners’ existing
free trade agreements with others in the Commonwealth of Independent
States (CIS).’ Ukraine has already taken this middle path by signing a
deal to become an observer in the CU trade bloc while still hoping to
finalize an EU Association Agreement in Vilnius.

Armenia has not yet declared the specifics of its CU alignment, i.e.,
whether it will hold observer status, or full membership — but the
latter seems more likely.

However, the EU has not abandoned all hope. During his visit to
Armenia on Sept. 12-14, Füle insisted that the EU will seek
possibilities for a continued partnership with Yerevan through a new
legal framework for cooperation.

Armenia has long struggled with the EU-Russia dilemma; Yerevan found
itself in a situation wherein `Russia plays, Europe pays.’ It relied
on the EU’s high-profile financial support in harsh economic
conditions, while at the same time Russia continued to bolster its
political and economic influence in the country.

On the eve of the Vilnius Summit in November, the EU-Russia-Armenia
triangle looks set to open up several short and long-term political
questions.

First of all, Armenia may suggest that it can still sign the
Association Agreement without its economic component, and, apparently,
the EU might agree to this solution to avoid losing all ties with
Armenia. Armenia in this regard is likely to play for time, because
under normal regulations, such agreements — including CU accession or
EU alignment — must be approved by parliament. And for now, no formal
agreement has yet been negotiated on the CU accession, which requires
a full assessment of the current customs regulations before the CU
regulations can be implemented. President Sarksyan is unlikely to risk
his personal reputation and relationship with Moscow by putting the
decision on CU membership to referendum, but he could arrange this by
some behind-the-scenes management of political groups in parliament.
By doing this, Sarksyan could avoid burning his political capital,
allowing him to say that the decision was reached democratically, by
the public.

The second possibility, which is unlikely, is that Armenia will rely
on dissent from the current members of the CU, Kazakhstan and Belarus.
However, there is no obvious argument that Belarus or Kazakhstan could
or would raise, and the timeline is very short: In October the CU
summit will take place, during which its three members are supposed to
approve Armenia’s membership. But it will not be a final decision;
Armenian Speaker of the National Assembly Hovik Abrahamyan announced
that the possible dates for signing the Treaty of Accession to the CU
could be arranged for 2014. Not surprisingly, as stated above,
Abrahamyan also acknowledged that there is still no final text of the
treaty, and it is likely that Armenia will not accept the text or that
parliament will vote against it.

The third possibility, which was on the European agenda, is to win
Armenia back to EU orientation by revitalizing the Turkish-Armenian
rapprochement process, which collapsed in 2009 for various reasons,
but mainly the unresolved Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Some political
experts have suggested that the last-ditch attempt to rescue Yerevan
from Moscow’s domination will be by trying to open the
Turkish-Armenian border. But taking into account the stalemate on the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, the current passivity in the
conflict-resolution process, and the fact that after its CU decision
Armenia is more dependent on Moscow, the unfortunate conclusion is
that the conflict-resolution process has ended up in the hands of
Russia. This will affect Azerbaijan’s role and strategy towards Russia
as well as the conflict-resolution process itself.

In the next section of this column, I will discuss the potential
impact of Armenia’s CU decision on Yerevan’s domestic policy along
with the Azerbaijani and Georgian positions.

http://www.todayszaman.com/columnistDetail_getNewsById.action?newsId=326433