EU Accuses Turkey Of Using Excessive Force To Quell Protests

EU ACCUSES TURKEY OF USING EXCESSIVE FORCE TO QUELL PROTESTS

October 16, 2013 – 17:57 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – The European Union accused Turkish police on
Wednesday, Oct 16, of using excessive force to quell protests earlier
this year, urging the government to strengthen oversight of the police
and to press ahead with investigations into their conduct.

According to Reuters, the criticism was contained in an annual report
by the EU’s executive Commission into Turkey’s progress in meeting
the requirements to join the 28-nation bloc.

Turkey began negotiations to join the EU in 2005, 18 years after
applying. But a series of political obstacles, notably over Cyprus and
resistance to Turkish membership in key members Germany and France,
have slowed progress to a snail’s pace.

Despite criticism of Ankara’s handling of the protests, the Commission
backed plans to breathe new life into Turkey’s EU bid by opening talks
on a new chapter, or policy area, of the membership negotiations,
the first to be opened in three years.

EU governments, led by Berlin, postponed plans to open the talks
on regional policy in June as a rebuke for the Turkish authorities’
handling of the demonstrations.

Protests against the government of Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan
swept Turkish cities after police used teargas and water cannon to
disperse a sit-in against the redevelopment of an Istanbul park.

Two weeks of clashes with police left four people dead and about
7,500 injured.

“The excessive use of force by police and the overall absence of
dialogue during the protests in May/June have raised serious concerns,”
the European Commission said.

“This underlines the urgent need for further reforms and the promotion
of dialogue across the political spectrum, and in society more broadly,
as well as for respect of fundamental rights in practice,” it said.

The Commission said Turkey had launched a number of investigations
into police conduct during the protests.

“These should be followed through in accordance with European standards
and those responsible brought to account,” it said.

It urged Turkey to push ahead with plans to set up a monitoring
mechanism to ensure the independent supervision of police conduct.

Despite the criticisms, the Commission praised judicial reforms in
Turkey and Erdogan’s announcement last month of a package of reforms
designed to salvage a peace process with Kurdish insurgents.

EU governments will consider the Commission’s report at a meeting on
Oct 22 and EU sources said they could decide to launch the new round
of talks with Turkey in early November.

Tradition V. Change: Opponents Of Gender Law Say "equal Rights" Thre

TRADITION V. CHANGE: OPPONENTS OF GENDER LAW SAY “EQUAL RIGHTS” THREATENS THE NATION

NEWS | 16.10.13 | 15:44

Photolure

By Gohar Abrahamyan
ArmeniaNow reporter

The bill on equal rights and opportunities for men and women passed
months ago by the parliament of Armenia keeps being a subject of
controversy and discontent among traditionalists as Wednesday a group
of NGOs and clergymen went on a march of protest demanding to annul
the law.

With slogans “the Armenian nation against the law on gender”, “Gender
law is a threat to Armenian families, we won’t let you ruin Armenian
families”, “Let us save children from gender perversion” and the like,
some three hundred protestors marched from Alexander Tamanyan statue,
downtown Yerevan, to the government building, where they handed a
letter to the members of the government with 3,500 signatures in
favor of annulling the law.

The word ‘gender’ was removed from the law adopted in May of 2013 and
verified by the president under public pressure and was replaced by
‘equal rights and opportunities for men and women’. Protest initiators
claim that the law “undermines the foundation of traditional Armenian
families, on which the Armenian nation has been able to survive
thousands of years”.

Haykanush Aloyan, member of “No to the Law on Gender Equality ”
initiative, says the law has to be declared anti-constitutional
as it contradicts a number of provisions of the family code of the
Constitution of Armenia.

“The negative consequences of the gender policy against which European
peoples are fighting, will shortly reach Armenia, if today that law is
not declared anti-constitutional,” he says, adding that their struggle
will be consistent till they achieve what they are fighting for.

Meanwhile, Women’s Support Center NGO director Maro Matosyan told
ArmeniaNow that Armenia, on the contrary, is greatly in need of such
law to break “the powerful gender dogmas”.

“The law says absolutely nothing about homosexuality or any sexual
orientation, it is only about equality between men and women, the
lack of which leads to domestic violence in our families and that
violence is what ends up destroying the family,” she says.

http://www.armenianow.com/news/49256/armenia_gender_issues_equal_rights_domestic_violence

Armenia To Participate In TTG INCONTRI Annual World Travel Exhibitio

ARMENIA TO PARTICIPATE IN TTG INCONTRI ANNUAL WORLD TRAVEL EXHIBITION

15:39 16/10/2013 ” ECONOMY

The National Competitiveness Foundation of Armenia, along with 8
Armenian travel agencies, will represent Armenia at TTG INCONTRI
annual world travel exhibition, which will take place in Rimini,
Italy from October 17th-19th.

This year, an estimated number of 2,400 travel agencies from around
130 countries and more than 50,000 professional tourism operators
are expected to take part in the exhibition.

Armenia’s rich cultural, historical and Christian heritage will be
presented in travel guides and maps in Italian during the exhibition.

The Italian market is one of the target destinations of NCFA’s
tourism promotion and the expected results of its development are
quite promising, the press service of the National Competitiveness
Foundation of Armenia reports.

Source: Panorama.am

Soccer: ‘Armenia More Motivated Than Italy’

‘ARMENIA MORE MOTIVATED THAN ITALY’

Football Italia
Oct 15 2013

By Football Italia staff

Vardan Minasyan is aware of the task facing his Armenia team tonight,
but remarks that they are greater motivated than opponents Italy.

Armenia head into this Tuesday’s closing round of World Cup
qualification games still in with a chance of finishing second behind
the Azzurri in Group B to take the play-off spot away from Bulgaria
and Denmark.

For that reason, their Coach believes his team will have the right
attitude in facing up to Cesare Prandelli’s side at the Stadio
San Paolo.

“We still have a chance to qualify,” Minasyan has pointed out to
reporters before the game.

“We are more determined that the Azzurri and it will provide us with
a lot of spirit, even as we cannot forget that we have been adversely
affected by injuries.

“That Italy has already qualified does not matter, they will be
motivated and will have behind them the strong support of Naples,
a city where they have not played for seven years.

“Balotelli is very strong and Insigne will be charged by his home
crowd. But, we have not exhausted our chances to go to Brazil.”

Think you know your Italian football? Share your knowledge, tips
and comments to win cash prizes in OLBG’s tipster competition –
£5,000 monthly.

http://www.football-italia.net/40606/%E2%80%98armenia-more-motivated-italy%E2%80%99

Armenian News Show Hits Trouble

ARMENIAN NEWS SHOW HITS TROUBLE

Vestnik Kavkaza, Russia
Oct 15 2013

15 October 2013 – 2:53pm

The Aylur news show of Armenia launched two weeks ago has been
operating in an emergency regime. It was aired with a 10-minute
delay last week and skipped broadcasting at 5.00 pm yesterday,
Tert.am reports.

Gevorg Altunyan, director of Ayvur, said that the problems were
caused by equipment that has not been mastered by the staff yet. The
specialist working with the equipment has not trained the staff yet,
he added.

The Aylur news show of Armenia launched two weeks ago has been
operating in an emergency regime. It was aired with a 10-minute
delay last week and skipped broadcasting at 5.00 pm yesterday,
Tert.am reports.

Gevorg Altunyan, director of Ayvur, said that the problems were
caused by equipment that has not been mastered by the staff yet. The
specialist working with the equipment has not trained the staff yet,
he added.

Ivlian Khaindrava: Eurasian Union Based On Compulsion Can Have No Pr

IVLIAN KHAINDRAVA: EURASIAN UNION BASED ON COMPULSION CAN HAVE NO PROSPECTS

ArmInfo’s Interview with Ivlian Khaindrava, expert at the Tbilisi-based
International Republican Institute

by David Stepanyan Tuesday, October 15, 22:59

Would you share your forecasts about the presidential election results
in Georgia?

The intrigues of the upcoming presidential election in Georgia
are two. Will Giorgi Margvelashvili, representative of the ruling
coalition, win the election, or a second round will be announced? Who
will take the second place, David Bakradze or Nino Burjanadze?

Overshadowed by Bidzina Ivanishvili, Margvelashvili will have to try
his best to somehow mobilize the voters who support Ivanishvili.

Consequently, he may fail to get 50% of votes in the first round.

Nevertheless, he cannot but win the election in the second round,
because Bakradze’s voters will never vote for Burjanadze and vice
versa. As regards the second place, if Bakradze takes the second place,
the balance of forces after the parliamentary elections of 2012 will
be generally confirmed. If Burjanadze takes the second place, she may
demand snap parliamentary elections. It will be a “flawed” demand,
as she refused to run for parliament in 2012 denying the possibility
to change anything through elections. She was mistaken, actually.

Nevertheless, Burjanadze will claim adequate representation in
the parliament for her party if she takes the second place in the
presidential race.

Actually, Georgia is a non-competitive transit country for Armenia,
Azerbaijan and Turkey. Do you think Georgia derives maximum benefit
from it?

I do not think that it is right to seek maximum gain from the
relations with the closest neighbor. Quite the contrary, the countries
should sacrifice part of their benefits today for more important and
long-term goals. In Europe they have already realized that and stopped
scrupulously calculating their own profits. As a result, the Schengen
Area and eurozone were created. The Georgian leadership observes this
approach and enjoys a similar attitude from the leaderships of Armenia,
Turkey and Azerbaijan.

In what fields could Tbilisi and Yerevan promote their relations and
cooperation today?

Not so long ago, at a meeting of Georgian and Armenian experts,
I called Georgia and Armenia a EU-friendly zone. After all, Armenia
followed Georgia’s example and lifted visa requirements for the EU
citizens. In addition, it has become much easier and comfortable now
for the people to pass the border crossings and customs points between
our countries. The perspectives would be wider if the two countries
continued simultaneously moving towards the EU. Unfortunately, the
situation has changed after 3 September, as Armenia was distracted to
another path. But this does not mean that the promotion of cooperation
will automatically stop. In this light, I’d like to outline the
upcoming Georgian-Armenian Conference on Transboundary Cooperation
to be held in Stepanavan with the support of the EU. Promoting human
contacts, providing and learning reliable information about each other
is of utmost importance for our publics. We must not allow minions
and parapolitical speculators to stir up international conflicts
from domestic problems that have always been and will always be in
the lives of the two neighbor-states.

After Armenia had taken a decision to join the Customs Union,
Russian experts started speaking of possible recognition of the
Nagorno-Karabakh Republic by Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan. They
also say that Azerbaijan can prevent this by Eurasian integration
only. How promising is this policy of “soft pressure” on Baku?

Russia manipulates pressure upon Yerevan as well as Baku, Tbilisi,
Kiev and Chisinau. I cannot call it “soft force” when, for instance,
they mean billion dollars weapon delivery, or blackmail in the context
of energy supply. Russia will do what is beneficial to itself and at
the time it wants. This is the rare occurrence when I agree to the
viewpoint of the incumbent President of Georgia, Mikheil Saakashvili,
which he expressed very much emotionally when making a speech at the
UN General Assembly. As regards other countries, even Belarus, the
most independent country from Russia, as well as other countries of
the CIS, CSTO and SCO did not recognize the independence of Abkhazia
and South Ossetia.

What are the prospects of the Russian policy of creation of a Eurasian
Union in the post-Soviet area through economic and political pressure
on the post-Soviet countries given that no other methods are observed,
unfortunately?

Fortunately, no other ways or temptations are observed, I would say.

Therefore, the Eurasian Union based on compulsion cannot have any
prospects today. We used to live under compulsion for a long period
of time. However, we have not lost the hankering to freedom and
sovereignty.

Global politics is experiencing sharp fluctuations directly affecting
the South Caucasus and the neighboring regions. The Syrian situation is
one of the examples. What can these fluctuations do to small countries
such as Georgia and Armenia?

Any upheavals more or less revoice even in the most far away points
of our global world, especially that diastrophic movement happens
in the neighboring country. Various risks increase in such cases
especially for such small countries like Georgia and Armenia located
at the lines of the civilized crackings. I think that we would feel
ourselves more secure if the South Caucasus were an integrated region
in the single system of collective security, but not a tinderbox,
which every busybody in town may blow up. First of all, we should
blame ourselves for that. However, not such countries determine
development of events in the world policy, and those which determine
development of events have often started doing that in an off hand
way. What do we have to do? We should keep head down and should not
put unattainable goals, but be steady in our purposes, which are in
line with fundamental interests of our peoples.

What changes do you think the country’s foreign policy needs?

The foreign policy of Georgia needs no changes. It needs to be
conducted more effectively and it definitely needs to be better
understood by certain politicians of the West. For instance, a group
of representatives of the European People’s Party have been under
Mikheil Saakashvili’s admiration for a long period of time and do not
want to see where our country has moved to during the second term
of his presidency. Such politicians had better think about how and
why Armenia has been drawn away from under their nose at this stage,
as the interest in Europeanisation of the South Caucasus is not of
the unilateral nature.

http://www.arminfo.am/index.cfm?objectid=F184C3D0-35CB-11E3-B0670EB7C0D21663

What Will Remain From Karabakh After Russian Troops?

WHAT WILL REMAIN FROM KARABAKH AFTER RUSSIAN TROOPS?

The U.S. Department of State and OSCE have stated that the Azerbaijani
elections are non-compliant. Obama has not congratulated Ilham Aliyev,
and the chief of his staff Ramiz Mehtiyev has accused the United
States of interfering with the country’s domestic affairs. So, it
would be logical to expect that the United States will not recognize
Aliyev as a legitimate president of Azerbaijan.

Anti-Azerbaijani moods are gathering momentum in Russia. The Russian
police suspects an Azerbaijani of Yegor Scherbakov’s murder. The
disorders that followed the murder had an ethnic Azerbaijani identity.

The Russian government is using nationalism in its foreign policy. In
summer the Russian propaganda used Hrachya Harutiunyan’s case as a
potential detonator of anti-Russian moods to bend Armenia towards it.

Armenia is in the Customs Union, already, and now it is Azerbaijan’s
turn. The Russian government cannot resolve its issues with Aliyev,
and the problem is Karabakh rather than energy.

Russia needs to deploy troops in Karabakh. Moscow seems to have
managed to persuade Armenia, and evidence is Zori Balayan’s letter.

Now they are trying to sway Azerbaijan.

What is Moscow preparing for Karabakh? And most importantly, where in
Karabakh will the Russian troops be based? The Armenian side hopes
to see them at the line of contact while Azerbaijan insists on the
border of former Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region.

The political scientist Andrias Ghukasyan says Artsakh may find
itself in a situation when the Russian forces will stand between
Artsakh and Azerbaijan, and such a solution may interest the United
States. Return of one or two territories may be considered. Commenting
on his letter, Zori Balayan also hinted that someone wants to seize
the liberated territories from Karabakh and leave “10 kilometers”. And
he is inviting the Russian troops to prevent this. How many kilometers
will the Russians leave?

Both the United States and Russia want to sway Aliyev and Turkey to
a settlement of the Karabakh conflict. The United States and Russia
may not be able to agree on the price of settlement, the number of
territories and kilometers. It is possible that they have agreed but
Aliyev has not.

Meanwhile, non-recognition of elections by the United States and
anti-Azerbaijani pronouncements in Moscow are good arguments. And
they will be used very soon.

The most horrible thing is that the Armenians will pay for the
so-called settlement. The question is: “How many regions?”

Naira Hayrumyan 23:30 15/10/2013 Story from Lragir.am News:

http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/politics/view/31105

Goodell Among The Armenians

GOODELL AMONG THE ARMENIANS

By Vahe H. Apelian, OH, USA, 11 October 2013

During family discussions in my formative years, I would hear the
elders of the family say that the American missionaries, failing
to evangelize a single Turk, resorted to evangelizing the Christian
Armenians.

Recently I came across the memoirs of Rev. William Goodell who played
a prominent role in establishing the Protestant community in the
Ottoman Empire. The book, titled “Forty Years in the Turkish Empire
or Memoirs of Rev. William Goodell D.D, Late Missionary of A.B.C.F.M
at Constantinople”, was edited by his son-in-law, E. D. G. Prime. It
was published by Robert Carter and Brothers (New York). Its fifth
edition, posted on line by Google, is dated 1878. The below quotes
are from the on-line book.

Rev. William Goodell left the United States and embarked on his
overseas mission in 1822. After a long sojourn in Malta, Lebanon,
and Syria, he arrived to Constantinople, as Istanbul was known
then. He had embarked on his mission on behalf of the American Board
of Commissioners for Foreign Missions (A.B.C.F.M.), which was the
first U.S. missionary organization.

I was surprised to read that Rev. Goodell’s primary, if not sole,
mission was evangelizing the Armenians. I quote “When Mr. Goodell went
to Constantinople, his mission was to the Armenians”. Mr. Goodell was
entrusted with the mission to Turkey proper because of his knowledge
of Armenian and Turkish he had mastered while in Malta, Syria and
Lebanon. He was also fluent in Arabic, Greek and Italian. He translated
the Bible into “Armeno-Turkish”, that is to say a Bible that reads
Turkish but is in Armenian characters. It was a twenty-year endeavor.

This assertion was a revelation to me but it made sense. Sultan’s
Sublime Porte would have never allowed American missionaries free rein
to evangelize Turks. It caved in to the Western powers and allowed
Americans to do missionary work in the Ottoman Empire as long as their
evangelism was carried among the Christian subjects of the empire. In
all probability, the missionaries and their organizations, if not also
their governments, were warmed of dire consequences should they attempt
evangelize the Turks. No wonder then not a single Turk was evangelized.

Why would A.B.C.F.M embark on its mission, I wondered, singling
Armenians when there were other Christian communities in the empire?

Reading the memoirs presented an interesting picture of a way of life
that did not have a natural evolution for reasons we all know too well.

Rev. William Goodell arrived in Constantinople on June 9, 1831. In
a letter to a friend in the United States, he noted: “My family is
said to be the first who has ever visited this place.” There were
other American ladies with the Goodells.

Constantinople, where the Goodells established their residency,
presented the following demographics. I quote: “The city of
Constantinople contained, including the suburbs, a population of about
1,000,000 of various nationalities and religions. The Turks and other
Mohammedans comprised more than half; the Greeks and Armenians each
numbered 150,000, the former being the more numerous, there were about
50,000 Jews; the remainder was made of Franks and people from almost
every part of the world”. Istanbul’s demography was much different
than it is now and the difference did not come about through natural
evolution.

These distinct ethnic communities naturally intermingled but “for
the most part occupied different quarters of the city with the Turks
having almost exclusive possession of the city proper.”

The ‘Millet’ system that constituted the core of the Ottoman Empire
appeared odd to this western visitor who found it to be an “anomalous
form of government, the Sublime Porte, as the Sultan’s government is
called, being supreme, while each separate nation has its own head.”

In the case of the Armenians, it was the Patriarch of Constantinople
who was also the civil head of the Armenian community (Millet).

The A.B.C.F.M. board and Rev. Goodell knew well that the Armenians
“were descendents of the ancient inhabitants of Armenia. The nation
embraced Christianity about the commencement of the fourth century”.

The zealous missionary and the organization that supported his mission
apparently had already determined, even before the missionary arrived
into the fold of the Armenians in the Ottoman Empire, that the Armenian
Church needed to embrace the “truth”. According to Rev.

Goodell, the Armenian Church “has almost wholly given up to
superstition and to idolatrous worship of saints, including Virgin
Mary, pictures, etc.”

There appears to be a more pragmatic and practical, if not a strategic
reason, for A.B.C;F.M and Rev. Goodell to single out the Armenians for
their mission. I quote: ” The Armenians were an enterprising people,
and the great wealth of the bankers, who were nearly all Armenians,
made them very influential throughout the empire, even with the
Turkish officials, who were largely dependent upon them for pecuniary
advances and assistance. The various connections of this people with
different parts of the country, and the influence which they were in
a position to exert, in promoting the spread of the Gospel in Turkey,
made it exceedingly desirable that they should embrace the truth.”

Mr. Goodell’s arrival in Constantinople coincided with a reformation
movement within the Armenian Church. Fifteen years later, and after
much agony and ecstasy, on July 1, 1846, “Forty persons, of whom
three were women, voluntarily entered onto covenant with God and with
each other, and we, in the name of all the evangelical churches of
Christendom, rose and formally recognized and acknowledged them as a
true church of Christ.” The assembly on that day became the foundation
of The Evangelical Church of Armenia–“Hayasdaniatz Avedaranagan
Yegeghetsi”. In time, its adherents would continue to render much
service to the Armenian nation, enriching it way more than one would
have expected from the meager demographic constituency of its faithful.

On November 15, 1847, “the grand vizier issued a firman, declaring
that the Christian subjects of the Ottoman government professing
Protestantism should constitutes a separate community…This firman
was so worded that converts form among the Greeks and Jews who joined
the Protestants might enjoy the same immunities”. On Nov. 27, 1850,
Sultan Abdul Mejid ratified the edict that became the “Magna Carta” of
the Protestant community that stands, to this day, in the Middle East.

The Armenian Evangelicals are part and parcel of the Protestant
community.

Having lived through this turbulent period for over 30 years, Rev.

Goodell left Constantinople on June 27, 1865, some 40 years after
leaving his homeland. Through those over four decades, he had visited
his country only once. Before taking leave for good, he addressed
his brethren in the Evangelical Churches in Turkey and said, “When
we first came among you, your were not a distinct people, nor did we
expect you ever would be; for we had not sectarian object in view, it
being no part of our plan to meddle with ecclesiastical affairs. Our
sole desire was to preach Christ and Him crucified.” By then the
Armenian Evangelical Church was firmly entrenched among the Armenians.

After his return to the United States, Rev. Goodell visited friends
and gave sermons. He lived with son and namesake in Philadelphia
where he passed away on Feb. 16, 1867.

http://www.keghart.com/Apelian-Goodell

‘Semi-Membership’ Would Be Unhappiest Option Now – Artur Sakunts

‘SEMI-MEMBERSHIP’ WOULD BE UNHAPPIEST OPTION NOW – ARTUR SAKUNTS

19:46 â~@¢ 15.10.13

In an interview with Tert.am Head of the Helsinki Citizens Assembly
Vanadzor office Artur Sakunts explained his decision to appeal Armenian
President Serzh Sargsyan’s “autocratic” decision on Armenia’s accession
to the Customs Union. He also spoke of a document Armenia may or may
not finally sign with the European Union (EU).

According to him, the issue must be dealt with under law. President
Serzh Sargsyan violated Armenia’s Constitution and citizens’ rights –
the right to have conscientious authorities that would be predictable
and accountable to the people.

Armenia has been working at an Armenia-EU Association Agreement for
three years and a half. So Mr Sakunts was informed of the processes
preceding the planned initialing of the Association Agreement and
could predict further developments. The Eastern Partnership Civil
Society Forum is working, and a national platform was formed involving
NGOs. So the logic of the Association Agreement is well known, and
the national platform was involved as a civil society institute.

As regards official statements that some people were well informed
of the negotiated text of the Association Agreement, Mr Sakunts said
that the document is available at the Eastern Partnership Civil Society
Forum – human rights, efficient government, energy, nature protection,
economy, visas and human contacts. Proposals for accomplishment of
the tasks in questions were regularly made at the forums.

No format of public involvement in the processes related to the Customs
Union has been proposed to civil society. So civil society, with its
proposals and concerns, got involved in the process of drafting an
Association Agreement. This is a concept typical of a democratic
state. Since this May, civil society has prepared a roadmap to
submit to the summit in Kishinev, Moldova. And Armenian authorities
assumed commitments to resolve certain problems before signing the
agreement. The agreement is actually a document, but civil society
had been involved in the drafting process until September 3. That is,
it can by no means be compared with the document on the Customs Union
in that the statement on Armenia’s accession to the Customs Union
was not preceded by any discussions.

Mr Sakunts also spoke of the Armenian president’s visit to Poland,
when he stated that ‘either…or’ was impossible and hinted that
Armenia would follow the way to the Customs Union.

According to him, it has nothing to do with the matter. Å tefan Fule
and Catherine Ashton had ruled out the possibility of dual membership.

The EU committed a mistake. The Eastern Partnership was a much more
transparent process. When Mr Sakunts raised the issue of Russia at
the civil society forum in Brussels, the EU played down Russia’s role
in the drafting of the Association Agreement. And now they have been
convinced that they should have held bilateral discussions. On the
other hand, Russia, when it sees neighboring states seeking other
sets of values, based on rule of law, democratic principles, it
“feels bad.” And Armenia is one of such nations.

Much has been said of Armenian authorities’ intention to sign a
document before or after the Vilnius summit to make an impression
that something has been signed.

In this context, Mr Sakunts said that a nation that has a set
of values cannot simultaneously be part of two systems. In this
respect, Armenia’s domestic policy cannot be the same as its
so-called complementary foreign policy. Domestic policy must meet the
requirements of the Constitution. At this moment, “semi-membership”
would be the unhappiest option. Mr Sakunts does not want the objections
to Armenia’s accession to the Customs Union to turn into a nation-wide
struggle because panhuman values must underlie the struggle.

Armenian News – Tert.am

Stepanakert Is Interested In Development Of Relations With Europe, A

STEPANAKERT IS INTERESTED IN DEVELOPMENT OF RELATIONS WITH EUROPE, ARTSAKH PRESIDENT SAYS

13:16 15/10/2013 ” REGION

On October 15, Artsakh Republic President Bako Sahakyan participated
in the second session of the 3rd Conference of the European Armenians
held at the European Parliament and delivered there a speech.

President Sahakyan touched upon issues related to state
building process in Artsakh, the country’s foreign policy, the
Azerbaijani-Karabagh conflict settlement and regional trends.

According to the President, cooperation with the European Parliament
is highly demanded both for the European Armenian organizations
and Artsakh.

The President stressed that Stepanakert is genuinely interested in
the development and strengthening relations with Europe, considering
European countries as friendly states.

Catholicos of the Armenian Apostolic Church’s Great House of Cilicia
Aram I, Speaker of the Armenian National Assembly Hovik Abrahamyan,
NKR Deputy Prime Minister Arthur Aghabekyan, NKR Foreign Minister
Karen Mirzoyan, members of the European Parliament and other officials
participated in the event, reported the Central Information Department
at the Artsakh President’s Office.

Source: Panorama.am