Charles Aznavour : « les Arméniens et les Juifs qui ont survécu à de

ISRAËL
Charles Aznavour : « les Arméniens et les Juifs qui ont survécu à des
tragédies auraient disparu depuis longtemps s’ils n’aimaient pas la
vie »

« Nous, Arméniens et Juifs avons tellement survécu aux tragédies que
si nos peuples n’aimaient pas la vie ils auraient disparu depuis
longtemps » confie Charles Aznavour (89 ans) aux médias israéliens
venus l’interviewer à l’hôtel « Dan » de Tel-Aviv. Charles Aznavour
qui va donner ce soir son premier et unique concert en Israël. « Je
sais que nous naissons pour mourir, mais en attendant il faut vivre
pleinement sa vie (…) la soif de la vie me pousse en avant » aurait
ensuite déclaré le célèbre chanteur et acteur Français d’origine
arménienne.

A la question d’un journaliste qui demandait à Charles Aznavour
pourquoi il se produisait en concert pour la première fois en Israël,
le chanteur aurait répondu que « malheureusement c’est la première
fois qu’on m’invite en Israël ». Mais il précisa qu’il ne venait pas
en Israël pour la première fois. Il fut le premier chanteur qui a
visité le pays juste après la fondation de l’Etat hébreu. Charles
Aznavour qui s’est déclaré « surpris de pas géants réalisés durant ces
dernières années par ce jeune Etat ». Le spectacle de Charles Aznavour
est titré « concert au nom de la Paix ». Charles Aznavour qui lors de
sa visite en Israël a désiré également se rendre sur le territoire
autonome de la Palestine. Mais cette dernière visite n’a pu se
réaliser en raison des conditions de sécurité qui obligèrent à
l’annuler. « Je suis venu en Israël pour chanter et non faire de la
politique » a toutefois précisé le chanteur.

Les journalistes ont alors demandé à Charles Aznavour son avis sur le
refus d’Israël de reconnaitre le génocide arménien. Charles Aznavour
aurait alors répondu que la reconnaissance du génocide arménien par
Israël revêt une très grande importance et qu’en tant qu’Arménien il
connait lutte pour la reconnaissance du génocide. Il comprend
également l’importance que revêt le mot « génocide » auprès des Juifs.
Il s’est dit toutefois confiant qu’un jour Israël reconnaitra le
génocide arménien.

Charles Aznavour a également confié qu’il avait dans sa famille des
catholiques, des protestants, des juifs et des musulmans. Et s’est
déclaré convaincu que les hommes pourront vivre ensemble dans la paix
et ceci quelles que soient leur religion et de leurs opinions
politiques.

Ci-dessous un article paru vendredi 22 novembre 2013 sur le site de Radio Canada

« Pour la première fois de sa carrière, le chanteur français Charles
Aznavour donnera un premier concert en Israël, samedi soir. En
conférence de presse vendredi à Tel-Aviv, il a expliqué qu’il venait «
chanter pour la paix », une invitation qu’il ne pouvait refuser.
Toutefois, l’artiste de 89 ans a déploré le fait qu’il chanterait
exclusivement devant un public israélien. Charles Aznavour qui a aussi
la nationalité arménienne regrette qu’Israël n’ait toujours pas
reconnu le génocide arménien perpétré par l’Empire ottoman en 1915. En
2009, il a été nommé ambassadeur d’Arménie en Suisse, où il vit.
Durant toute sa carrière, il a toujours défendu la mémoire du peuple
arménien. Charles Aznavour a rappelé qu’il était allé plusieurs fois
en Israël. Il avait même chanté dans un cabaret de Tel-Aviv tout juste
après la création de l’État d’Israël en 1948 ».

Krikor Amirzayan

samedi 23 novembre 2013,
Krikor Amirzayan ©armenews.com

http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=95047

Armenia’s Public Council Concerned Over Cumulative Pension Bill

ARMENIA’S PUBLIC COUNCIL CONCERNED OVER CUMULATIVE PENSION BILL

22:05 ~U 21.11.13

Armenia’s Public Council has concerns over the plan to introduce the
compulsory pension accumulation system in the light of the increasing
complaints by different citizens.

A special working group has now been launched to study the
appeals filed, Vazgen Safaryan, the chairman of the Council’s
Financial-Economic and Budgetary Affairs, told Tert.am.

“We have received over 2,000 appeals, complaints from [citizens]
working in high-salaried positions, [particularly] in the IT sector. A
working group has been set up by the Public Council’s president to
study the questions, organize public debates and submit corresponding
proposals to the Government,” he said.

Safaryan noted that the law, adopted three years ago, contains
several controversial clauses whose implications hadn’t been properly
studied then.

“Particularly, the selection of regulating operators. Secondly, the
law envisages [compulsory] payments in the amount of 10 percent of
the income, but when the income tops 500,000 Drams (over $1,200),
the Government’s share decreases, imposing a higher pay duty on the
one from whom the money is to be charged,” he said.

Safaryan added that the proposed bill also conflicts the constitutional
provision allowing a person to fully control his property. He said
that by making compulsory payments for years, a person thus becomes
deprived of that freedom until reaching the retirement age.

Armenian News – Tert.am

Assembly Participates in `Look into the Future’ Youth Expo in Armeni

PRESS RELEASE
Armenian Assembly of America
1334 G Street, N.W., Suite 200
Washington, D.C. 20005
Tel: (202) 393-3434
Fax: (202) 638-4904
E-mail: [email protected]
Web:

*Armenian Assembly of America Participates in `Look into the Future’
Youth Expo in Armenia *

November 21, 2013

*YEREVAN**, ARMENIA* – Last week, the Armenian Assembly of America
(Assembly) participated in a three-day youth conference and expo organized
by the Republic of Armenia entitled `Look into the Future,’ reported the
Assembly. From November 12-15, Armenian youth packed the Republic of
Armenia’s main Conference Hall where they were joined by the Prime Minister
of Armenia, Tigran Sargsyan.

Over 60 youth organizations took part in the expo-conference throughout
Armenia. It was organized in the framework of events dedicated to the World
Youth and Students International Days. At the expo-conference in Yerevan,
the Armenian Assembly of America was well represented as a strong supporter
of youth initiatives in Armenia.

Prime Minister Sargsyan, accompanied by Assembly youth activist, Hayk
Mamijanyan, walked through the expo booths and discussed the activity and
programs of the Armenian Assembly of America.

The participants of Assembly’s Young Activists (AYA) program presented
their implemented projects, published materials regarding their
achievements, as well the first two volumes of *Regional Affairs
Journal,*which contains articles written mostly by the Assembly’s AYA
scholar fellows.

`Such a representative, pan-Armenian youth conference was long-awaited.
It’s difficult to overvalue the role of our youth in Armenia’s future
development. That is precisely why the Armenian Assembly of America has
become a nucleus of youth activity in Armenia, unifying several of the most
constructive and forward looking youth groups in our young republic,’
stated Assembly Country Director Armina Darbinian.

###

Photo Caption 1: Armenian Assembly of America booth at the `Look into the
Future’ Youth Expo in Yerevan, Armenia

Photo Caption 2: Table of Assembly published materials and *Regional
Affairs Journal*

Photo Caption 3: Assembly Young Activist (AYA) member Hayk Mamijanyan
(left) introduces Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan (center) to the Assembly’s
publications

Photo Caption 4: Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan (left), Assembly AYA member
Hayk Mamijanyan (second from left) and AYA members review youth publications

Available online:

http://armenianassembly.tumblr.com/
http://bit.ly/1c6NEdN

Armenian President Sends Condolence Telegram To President Of Cyprus

ARMENIAN PRESIDENT SENDS CONDOLENCE TELEGRAM TO PRESIDENT OF CYPRUS

Thursday,
November
21

Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan sent today a telegram of condolence
to Cypriot President Nicos Anastasiades in connection with the death
of former President of Cyprus Glafcos Clerides, the press service of
the Armenian president said.

Serzh Sargsyan highly appreciated the ex-president Glafcos
Clerides’s contribution to the strengthening of Cypriot statehood
and socioeconomic prosperity, as well as his personal contribution
to the development of centuries-old Armenian-Cypriot friendship and
his kind attitude to the Armenian community of Cyprus.

Glafcos Clerides died on November 15 at the age of 94.

TODAY, 20:14

Aysor.am

Armenian Cognac To Taste In Vienna And London

ARMENIAN COGNAC TO TASTE IN VIENNA AND LONDON

18:59, 21 November, 2013

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 21, ARMENPRESS. The performance hall of the hotel
“Hotel de France” in Vienna held a tasting ceremony of “Ararat”
cognac. The organizers were the Embassy of the Republic of Armenia
to Austria and “Ararat” cognac factory of Yerevan with the support
of the company of Austrian Wine Brotherhood and Wine Knights.

“Armenpress” was informed from the Department for Mass Media and
Public Relations of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of
Armenia that the Ambassador of the Republic of Armenia to Austria Arman
Kirakosyan made an opening speech at the course of the ceremony. The
director of “Ararat” cognac factory of Yerevan Ara Grigoryan welcomed
the participants. The initiation and development history of cognac
production in Armenia, the current variety of products, as well
as some delicacies of tasting were introduced to the guests of the
ceremony. The tasting ceremony was accompanied by live jazz music of
the Lebanes well-known jazz pianist Hovhannes Jibian.

http://armenpress.am/eng/news/740999/armenian-cognac-to-taste-in-vienna-and-london.html

Azerbaijani Media Commend Armenian Presidential Spokesman

AZERBAIJANI MEDIA COMMEND ARMENIAN PRESIDENTIAL SPOKESMAN

13:36 ~U 20.11.13

Azerbaijani mass media had to provide coverage of the
Armenian-Azerbaijani presidential meeting in Vienna, using Armenian
Presidential Spokesman Arman Saghatelyan’s tweets.

“The Azerbaijani presidential spokesman was silent, as usual,” the
haqqin.az news website reports.

“Arman Saghatelyan left a new Twitter message every minute. President
Serzh Sargsyan’s every step was reported, with overseas media referring
to the information. We had to do the same as well,” the Azerbaijani
journalists writes.

Azerbaijani media also had to quote the RFE/Radio Liberty Russian
service, which, in turn, referred to Arman Saghatelyan.

“What can we call it? Azerbaijan’s failed media coverage of the
Aliyev-Sargsyan meeting?”

Armenian News – Tert.am

The German-Turkish Conspiracy Against The Diaspora

THE GERMAN-TURKISH CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE DIASPORA

By MassisPost
Updated: November 19, 2013

By Toros Sarian

The background and the effects of the German financed reconciliation
projects.

The decades of silence regarding the Armenian Genocide during the
Ottoman Empire was instantly broken as Gourgen Yanikian shot the
Turkish General Consul and his Employee in Santa Barbara in January
1973. Turkish hopes that this act of Genocide would remain forgotten
was transformed into an illusory wish. An elderly Armenian, living
in distant California, proved that the descendants of this Turkish
atrocity had not forgotten. In Santa Barbara the campaign had begun for
the international recognition of this Genocide. During the campaign
Armenians have informed the world public and have increased world
awareness of these atrocities committed within the Ottoman Empire. Many
Parliaments have passed resolutions recognizing the historical fact
of the Armenian genocide. Turkey has declared the Armenian Diaspora
to be a national enemy and took all possible measures to combat the
“Armenian Lobby” and to prevent the International recognition of the
Armenian Genocide.

It is widely accepted that Germany carries a joint responsibility for
the Genocide against the Armenians during the Ottoman Empire period.

This is clearly documented in the archive papers of the German Foreign
Ministry which were published by the German journalist and publisher
Wolfgang Gust in 2005. He persistently pointed out that only the
German Government could have prevented Turkey from carrying out the
Governments criminal plan of “solving the Armenian problem”. The
German government under Emperor Wilhelm II failed to do so as their
Alliance with the Turkish Regime was more important than the lives
of the Christian Armenians.

The Berlin Government had been extremely silent regarding these
atrocities, whilst at the same time proclaiming their exemplary
conduct in addressing the atrocities committed against the European
Jews during the Second World War, even suggesting that Turkey should
take to heart their example. But when Germany is so courageous and
open to working out the crimes of their past why had the German
government remained silent till 2005 before beginning to evaluate
their part in the Armenian Genocide? Only at the start of 2005
did the present Chancellor, Angela Merkel, forward a motion to
parliament to commemorate the victims of the atrocities committed
against Armenians throughout the Ottoman Empire. In April a debate
took place on this theme in the German Parliament and in June an
all party formulated resolution was passed. This resolution read as
follows: “The German Bundestag honors and commemorates the victims of
violence, murder and expulsion among the Armenian people before and
during the First World War. The Bundestag deplores the deeds of the
Young Turkish government in the Ottoman Empire which have resulted
in the almost total annihilation of the Armenians in Anatolia. It
also deplores the inglorious role played by the German Reich which,
in spite of a wealth of information on the organized expulsion and
annihilation of Armenians, has made no attempt to intervene and stop
these atrocities.” (Full text: )

Although in the Resolution there was no explicit mention of an Armenian
genocide many Armenians outside Germany interpreted the Resolution as
being a recognition by the German Government of the Genocide against
the Armenians. On the website of the ~DArmenian National Institute”
it was stated that Germany was one of the nations which had recognized
the Genocide. However, the Organization of Armenians in Germany has
never viewed this Resolution from the German Parliament as recognition
of the Genocide.

The Central Committee of Armenians in Germany has made it clear on
many occasions that this parliamentary resolution does not meet the
expectations of the Armenians in Germany.

In a Press release on the 13th March 2010 the organization stated
that “The formal recognition of the Armenian Genocide by Germany
is unavoidable and well overdue”, On the 6th April the organization
demanded again from the German Parliament the formal recognition of
the Armenian Genocide by the Ottoman Empire in 1915, according the
UN convention concerning Prevention and Punishment of Acts of genocide.

There are clearly different opinions regarding the assessment of
the German parliamentary Resolution of 2005. If the resolution
was such a clear recognition of the genocide, why did the Turkish
Government accept it so calmly and not react as it always did after
such resolutions? Germany has a large Turkish immigrant population
and the Turkish nationalists are well organized, but still there were
no protests or demonstrations. There were no demands for a boycott
of German products. Although the Turkish Government sent a formal
protest against the resolution, it was very mild in contrast to other
occasions when a state recognized the Genocide.

One comes to the conclusion that there must be other reasons why
the Turkish Government and Turkish Nationalists reacted so tamely to
the resolution. After the debate in April 2005 the German Chancellor
Schroder travelled to Turkey. One theme was surely the contents of the
all party formulated resolution. As time passed it was clear that the
German and Turkish Governments had agreed upon a common strategy in
dealing with the Genocide resolution. The old German-Turkish alliance
had made the Genocide in 1915 possible and now the two allies had
to find a way of preventing the demands of the Armenians for the
recognition of the genocide from being pushed into the political arena.

The key to answering this question lies in essence in the title
of the resolution Thus: “Germany must make her contribution to the
reconciliation between Turks and Armenians”

At first glance the demand for reconciliation seems something which
cannot be rejected or criticized. Reading from statements issued by
the German government since 2005, it is clear that the policy is not
reconciliation between Armenians and Turks, but between the Republic
of Armenia and Turkey. If the German government views the Genocide
question as an issue to be solved by the two states then it is clear
that the Armenian Diaspora has no role to play, according to the
German government. The descendants of the survivors of the genocide,
who have settled all over the world, would be accordingly ignored.

Although over the decades it has been these people who have campaigned
for the recognition of the atrocities. Demands of the German Parliament
for a Turkish-Armenian reconciliation have aroused no opposition from
the Turkish government: It is willing for reconciliation, but is not
prepared to recognize the atrocities of 1915 as genocide.

The Armenian Diaspora is viewed by the Turkish Government as an
“enemy”, which they have not so far been able to muzzle. The only
possible way available for the Turkish Government to bypass the
“irreconcilable Armenian Diaspora” is to turn the Genocide Question
into a theme to be dealt with the Republic of Armenia. The Genocide
will become a question for negotiation between the two states, thus
the Diaspora will have no right or chance to engage in the process.

The weakened State of Armenia, already isolated by Turkey and
Azerbaijan can alone be put under even more pressure not only by Turkey
but also her allies, especially Germany. By putting the reconciliation
of the two nations, onto the political Agenda, the German Government
has done the Turkish government an immense favor.

Armenian organizations in Europe have neither been very attentive in
following the political developments since 2005. Nor have they been
able to recognize the ramification of the German contribution to the
Reconciliation process, let alone the political motives behind this
policy. However on evaluation of the information currently available
it becomes increasingly clear. Ulla Jelpke, Parliamentary member for
the Links Party (The Left Party) put forward a short written question
to the German government in August this year. Her aim was to ascertain
which academic projects were being financed by the German state with
the aim of critically evaluating the Genocide Question. The Foreign
Office Secretary of State, Cornelia Piper responded giving details
of great interest to Armenians. The detailed statement included
the following: “On the basis of the cited Resolution of the German
Parliament from June 2005, mentioned in your question, the German
Government´s representative at the Department for Culture and Media
has granted a sum of 410,000 euros to the Lepsius House in Potsdam,
for equipment and cultural development programs, to establish the
House as a center for German-Turkish Research and Cultural Place of
Exchange. The German Government is accompanying the Turkish-Armenian
reconciliation process with support for cross-border activities of
NGO´s and German Political Foundations. In this spirit, the German
Foreign Office has provided funds to a total of 1,4 million between
2009 and 2013 to the reconciliation project established by the
Institute for International Cooperation of the German Adult Education
Association, (dvv international), under the title “Speaking to One
Another”. The content of this project involves Student and scholar
exchanges between Armenia and Turkey, common critical historical
evaluation of the past events in the form of seminars, publications
and exhibitions.” Apart from these two large sums 410,000 and 1,
4 million, the German Government has funded smaller activities to
the sum of 50,000 euros. In total, the sum of 1, 9 million has been
provided to support projects involved in the Reconciliation Process
between Armenia and Turkey.

The financial support by Lepsius House in the city of Potsdam is
widely known, and the work of Lepsius House is also known also by many
Armenians in Germany. But, the work carried out by “dvv international”
is largely unknown. On their website the organization’s areas of
activity are described as follows: “The dvv supports a European and
worldwide exchange of information and expertise regarding adult
education and development, aids the establishment and expansion
of structures for youth and adult education in developing and
transformation countries and offers training consultation and medium
provision for global intellectual euro political learning.” (For more
information see: )

This institution which has been active in the Republic of Armenia since
2002 and according to their Website is “one of the most important
players in the field of Adult Education and LifeLong Learning”, has
certainly established good contacts with the Government. The German
Foreign Office and the dvv-international, and the Armenian ministries
have presumably cooperated in organizing the Reconciliation projects
in Armenia. A similar close cooperation will have taken place with the
Turkish Government as the “dvv international” is also active in Turkey.

The Sarkisian government gladly embraced their role, thought out by
Germany, in the Reconciliation process and, not purely for political
reasons. They should have made it unmistakably clear right from the
start, that the Genocide Question was certainly not an issue solely
between Republic of Armenia and Turkey, but an issue which also
involved the Armenian Diaspora. The position of Yerevan on this issue
shows again that there is no clear agreement between the Sarkisian
Government and the Diaspora regarding the Genocide Question.

One of the Turkish government’s policies is to drive a wedge
between the Diaspora and the Republic of Armenia. The signing of the
Turkish-Armenian Protocols in Zurich is in this connection was a great
success for this Turkish political strategy, even though the Protocols
were not ratified in the end. It may appear to be coincidental that the
dvv-international began their reconciliation projects in the same year,
2009, as the Turkish-Armenian Protocol was being signed in Zurich
and it is not known when the ~DSecret-Diplomacy” began, which led
to the Zurich protocols. If the Turkish-Armenian negotiations began
after 2005 it could be an indication that the negotiations had been
initiated by the German government. Due to Germany’s involvement in
the Genocide, Germany had an interest in ensuring that this theme
was at last taken off the political Agenda.

As close ally to the Turkish government, Germany also had established
close contacts to the Armenian government. Germany had given
generous aid to the country and German investors are an important
investment factor in the region. Therefore the German government had
enough leverage to “convince” Yerevan as to the benefits of starting
negotiations. Perhaps, this leverage had to be used again to persuade
Yerevan to support their “Reconciliation Projects”. After Germany
had pushed the “Recognition Question” onto the “Reconciliation Track”
the Diaspora was and still is confronted with a new situation.

Should they give up their campaign for the recognition of the Genocide
and instead join the “Reconciliation Process” with Turkey?

The Armenian Diaspora must realize the German Government pursued
Reconciliation Policy serves Turkish political interests. Thanks
to Germany, the Turkish Government can now point out that these
“Reconciliation Projects” are being supported by the Armenian
Government and are prepared to “solve” the Genocide question in
cooperation with them. If the international community follows suit and
also views the Genocide Question as a matter between only the Republic
of Armenia and Turkey then the Armenian Diaspora with their demands
for recognition of the Genocide would find no support, as in the past.

The Sarkisian Government was heavily criticized for the Zurich
Protocol. But why is the Diaspora remaining silent when Germany
and Turkey together with the Republic of Armenia are cooperating
on reconciliation? The goal of the German financed “Reconciliation
Projects” is not to persuade Turkey to recognize the atrocities of
1915 as Genocide but to bring about reconciliation between Turkey
and the Republic of Armenia. If this policy succeeds, the Diaspora
campaign for Genocide Recognition which began with the shots in Santa
Barbara would be at an abrupt end.

Photo: Enver Pahsa (L) meeting with a German military officer in
Berlin. (photo AA)

http://massispost.com/archives/10078
www.armenian-genocide.org
www.dvv-international.de

Stepanakert Wants Full Participation In Talks

STEPANAKERT WANTS FULL PARTICIPATION IN TALKS

Armenian President Serzh Sarkisian and Azeri President Ilham Aliyev
with their respective foreign ministers during Tuesday’s meeting
in Vienna

STEPANAKERT-One day after a meeting between presidents Serzh Sarkisian
and Ilham Aliyev in Vienna, the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic Foreign
Ministry issued a statement in which it emphasized the importance of
including Karabakh in the negotiation process, reported the respective
press offices.

“The resumption of high level meetings between the Presidents of
Armenia and Azerbaijan after a long break is important from the
perspective of the intensification of the peaceful settlement process
of the conflict between Azerbaijan and Karabakh and maintaining peace
and stability in the region,” said the statement.

“We believe that the meeting proves that there is no alternative to
the peaceful settlement and serves to ensure its irreversibility,”
added the statement.

“At the same time, we consider it necessary to note that real
progress in the settlement process could only be reached by taking
into consideration the existing realities and with the restoration
of full-format negotiations with direct and immediate participation
of the Nagorno Karabakh Republic in all its stages,” said the ministry.

Speaking to students on the eve of the summit, Nagorno-Karabakh
Republic President Bako Sahakian emphasized that he has expressed to
the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairmen his trepidations about the so-called
Madrid Principles, on which the negotiations are based.

“We have always had reservation regarding the Madrid Principles,
and we have said this on many occasions,” said Sahakian, signaling
that official Stepanakert is anticipating new approaches from the
mediators, without undermining the role of the Minsk Group co-chairmen.

Sahakian also told student about certain agreements reached with the
co-chairmen in 2007, among them an understanding that any meeting
taking place between the co-chairmen and Karabakh authorities must
take place in Stepanakert.

“In 2007 I told the Co-Chairs I refuse to meet with them in Yerevan.

They respect my request and continue to visit Artsakh themselves,”
explained Sahakian.

http://asbarez.com/116448/stepanakert-wants-full-participation-in-talks/

BAKU: Representatives Of Azerbaijani And Armenian Civil Societies To

REPRESENTATIVES OF AZERBAIJANI AND ARMENIAN CIVIL SOCIETIES TO MEET IN STRASBOURG

APA, Azerbaijan
Nov 20 2013

[ 20 November 2013 15:21 ]

French Ambassador: “A new impetus has been given to bring closer the
dialogue between the two countries”

Baku. Viktoria Dementeva – APA. “We regard every meeting of the
presidents as a positive event,” Ambassador of France to Azerbaijan
Pascal Meunier told journalists, APA reports.

Commenting on the Vienna meeting of Azerbaijani and Armenian
presidents, Ambassador said he is familiar with the statement issued
by the co-chairs.

“They are planning a new meeting. It means that a new impetus has
been given to bring closer the dialogue between the two countries. Of
course, France supports this,” he said.

The diplomat said France supports the contacts between the conflicting
parties, including the relations between the civil societies. He said
the representatives of the Azerbaijani and Armenian civil societies
will meet in Strasbourg on November 28-29.

Joint declaration will be signed basing on the outcomes of the meeting.

Second Coming Of Forbes To Armenia

SECOND COMING OF FORBES TO ARMENIA

Vestnik Kavkaza, Russia
Nov 20 2013

20 November 2013 – 11:26am

by David Stepanyan, Yerevan. Exclusively for Vestnik Kavkaza

In mid-November, Forbes released its first Armenian version. The
magazine is published in 27 countries and distributed throughout 55.

An attempt to publish Forbes magazines was made in Armenia in 2007,
resulting in a total failure. This is why the second coming of the
magazine should be analyzed with account of the first bitter attempt.

The monthly Forbes Armenia is published by a little-known company
Media Partners and the portal. There are plans to
make special releases of Forbes Life and organization of business
conferences. The names of publishers and the editor-in-chief of Forbes
Armenia say nothing. The specifics of the magazine’s work speak for
themselves. The magazine studies and publishes lists of billionaires,
most influential and notable people of the world.

Despite the well-developed rating systems of Forbes, Armenian
publishers will have to consider the peculiarities of the Armenian
media market. One of them is the absolute inseparability of Armenian
business billionaires and millionaires with all branches of the
government and unification of Armenian capital and crime. The best
confirmation of the statement is the latest exposures made by hetq.am.

The agency found some very suspicious offshore accounts of Prime
Minister Tigran Sargsyan and Archbishop of the Ararat Eparchy Navasard
Kchoyan.

By the way, Sargsyan has recently been highlighted in another
scandalous story. The Zhokhovurd paper, quoting reliable sources,
accused the prime minister of bribing rating agencies. In particular,
the prime minister’s godson, Minister for Finances David Sarkisyan,
spent $217,000 on Fitch Ratings LD and $120,000 on Moody’s Investors
Service for positive ratings which give no reflection of the real
economic situation in Armenia.

Considering this, it is interesting to understand who is really
behind the second coming of the US magazine to Armenia. The answer to
this question would clarify who and how Forbes Armenia will manage
to cover the quite complicated tangle of relations between business
and government. Back to 2007. It is notable that the first release of
Forbes in Armenia listed the names of the richest people starting with
the then President Robert Kocharyan, the unsinkable head of the State
Committee for Income Gagik Khachatryan and some businessmen affiliated
with the government. Then, Editor-in-Chief of the magazine Petros
Kazaryan was called in for a conversation. Rumours say that Bagramyan
characterized his first release of Forbes as a gag. It is still unclear
why an authoritative magazine well-known all around the world made
such a poor joke specially in Armenia, quite far from April 1.

Nonetheless, the Forbes ‘joke’ ended up not as funny as expected,
the magazine was closed down. Although, during the iron reign of the
Kocharyan regime, such ‘impudence’ could not expect any other outcome.

Considering 60 years of Forbes’ experience, the ability of the
magazine to calculate ratings of Armenia’s richest people using its
system provokes doubts. Armenian oligarchic functionaries regularly
register assets as property of wives, distant relatives and even
mothers-in-law. Journalists will have to do a lot of work in their
running after relatives of billionaire functionaries.

Thus, another appearance of Forbes in Armenia is probably a scheme
of very serious people mistakenly viewed as the highest elite in
the republic. In other words, competitors for power. If so, Forbes
Armenia will turn into a powerful weapon to fight mudslinging between
both active and ex-functionaries.

According to another explanation, Armenian discreet
millionaires/billionaires could have become a target of foreign
powers. In this case, everything will seem far from obvious because
materials for mudslinging of foreign counterparts is what the Armenian
government lacks. Anyway, the second coming of Forbes to Armenia
looks promising and will doubtlessly be followed by very interesting
information about national functionaries.

The Forbes Armenia team will fill the rate ranks of Armenian magazines
doing serious journalist work in the light of the increasingly tabloid
press. Tabloid popularity has become a global tendency but releases
of pointless and blank information has become a typical phenomenon in
Armenia. In the context of stupid headlines about love-related and
anatomical peculiarities of US television personality of Armenian
origin Kim Kardashian Armenian mass media are filled with, the
news section has lost all real value. In this background of junky
information space, Armenia feels a lack of reasonable and balanced
comments, not to mention analysis.

Considering that emissions of senseless information are made
purposefully by authorities of oligarch-owned sources of mass media,
appearance of Forbes in Armenia, on condition that it is not under
control of oligarchic functionaries, may become a bright spot on the
junkyard called the Armenian information space.

http://vestnikkavkaza.net/articles/politics/47765.html
www.forbes.am