Attorney General’s Office Petitions To Georgia To Extradite Armenian

ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE PETITIONS TO GEORGIA TO EXTRADITE ARMENIAN BUSINESSMAN INVOLVED IN OFFSHORE SCANDAL

February 04, 2014 | 15:45

YEREVAN. – The Armenia Prosecutor General’s Office has applied to
Georgia, with a petition to extradite Armenian businessman Ashot
Sukiasyan, who is involved in an offshore scandal.

The Prosecutor General’s Office press service informed the aforesaid
to Armenian News-NEWS.am.

The office of the Armenian Prosecutor General has sent a petition
to the Office of the Attorney General of Georgia, with a request to
extradite Sukiasyan–who is under international investigation–to
Armenia’s law enforcement agencies, so that criminal proceedings may
be launched against him.

The extradition request is under consideration.

Sukiasyan was caught on January 31, in Georgian capital city Tbilisi,
with the assistance of the Interpol National Central Bureau in Armenia
and as a result of cooperation with the Georgian law enforcement.

As reported earlier, Ashot Sukiasyan had sent a letter to the then
Armenian Prosecutor General, and its photocopy to Hetq.am news agency,
and specifically written as follows: “I would like to reflect on the
WLISPERA HOLDINGS LIMITED offshore organization. I am the founder of
this organization, and I am the one who wrote shares in the names of
[Armenian PM Tigran] Sargsyan and [Archbishop Navasard] Kjoyan [the
Vicar General of the Araratian Pontifical Diocese of the Armenian
Apostolic Church], without their knowledge and consent. I did this
to keep my business away from harassment. I did not realize that this
could have implications.”

The Armenian General Investigation Department had laid charges on
Sukiasyan, and on the grounds of committing fraud, causing property
damage, and legalizing criminally-earned income. Arrest was set as
his restraining order.

Earlier, Hetq.am had written that Tigran Sargsyan, Archbishop Navasard
Kjoyan, and “jeweler” Ashot Sukiasyan are shareholders in an offshore
company called Wlispera Holdings Limited, which is registered in
Cyprus. Sargsyan and Kjoyan, however, have denied their involvement
in such a company.

News from Armenia – NEWS.am

Ishkhan Zakaryan. "The Sponsors Cover The Expenditures Of Pan-Armeni

ISHKHAN ZAKARYAN. “THE SPONSORS COVER THE EXPENDITURES OF PAN-ARMENIAN WINTER GAMES.”

February 4 2014

To the question of Aravot of how much funds are allocated from the
state budget for the Pan-Armenian Winter Games, Ishkhan Zakaryan,
Chairman of World Committee of Pan Armenian games, responded,
“The expenditures of athletes’ travel, clothing are covered by the
organizations and sponsors, who organize their trips to Armenia. Since
the Winter Games are to be held in Armenia for the first time, I have
a clear instruction from the President of Armenia, Serzh Sargsyan,
in support to our countrymen, to organize their lodging, food, take
care of the issues like the opening and closing ceremonies, providing
sites, and conducting competitions. I must say in advance that no
funds were allocated from the state budget. There is something that
I think it is right and justified decision. If a delegation arrives
from Syria, we’ll take care of all their costs. I repeat, everything
will be done through sponsors, whom I have already applied.” To the
question of who the sponsors are, Mr. Zakaryan refrained from giving
any names, mentioning, “The name of the sponsors will be made public
upon completion of the Games. There might be a problem with the 6th
Summer Games, which will take place on August 2015, in the year of
100th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide. It has been included in
the list of state events and a major sporting event will take place.

7-8 sports have been added to the program and participation of about 7
million Diaspora youth is expected. A lot of hard work is expected. It
is possible that we might refer to the government’s support for that
time. Although, I do not rule out the possibility that there might
be one or two sponsors, who would take over all the costs. And it
does not matter where they are from. They are Armenians. And they
see that the idea is right and sound.”

Ashot Hakobyan

Read more at:

http://en.aravot.am/2014/02/04/163652/

Armenian Companies To Participate In US Exhibition On Laser Technolo

ARMENIAN COMPANIES TO PARTICIPATE IN US EXHIBITION ON LASER TECHNOLOGY AND OPTICS

February 04, 2014 | 10:38

Several Armenian companies likewise will take part in the Photonics
West 2014 Exhibition on laser technology and optics.

The event will be held from Tuesday to Thursday in San Francisco, USA.

The exhibition is one of the world’s largest and most influential
biomedical optics and biophotonics fairs.

About 1,300 companies are represented at the event, which has around
20,000 visitors each year.

The Armenian Development Agency and the Industry Development Fund
assist in the Armenian companies’ participation in the exhibition.

News from Armenia – NEWS.am

Darfour : La Situation Securitaire S’est Deterioree Au Cours De 2013

DARFOUR : LA SITUATION SECURITAIRE S’EST DETERIOREE AU COURS DE 2013

Publie le : 04-02-2014

Info Collectif VAN – – Le Collectif VAN vous
invite a lire cette information publiee sur le site de l’ONU le 23
janvier 2014.

Legendee photo : Des soldats du contingent nigerian de la MINUAD,
stationnes a El Daein, au Darfour oriental, le 9 octobre 2012. Photo:
MINUAD/Albert Gonzalez Farran

ONU

Darfour : la situation securitaire s’est deterioree au cours de 2013,
selon Ladsous

23 janvier 2014 – La situation securitaire au Darfour reste instable
et s’est meme deterioree au cours de l’annee 2013, alors que la mise
en oeuvre du processus de paix a peu progresse, a declare jeudi
le Secretaire general adjoint des Nations Unies aux operations de
maintien de la paix, Herve Ladsous, devant le Conseil de securite.

>, a dit M. Ladsous. >, a-t-il ajoute. Il a note que, malgre l’engagement du
gouvernement soudanais de mener des enquetes et de faire comparaître
les auteurs de ces faits devant la justice, aucune arrestation n’a
ete realisee.

S’agissant du processus de paix, le Secretaire general adjoint
a note que la mise en oeuvre du Document de Doha pour la paix au
Darfour avait progresse très lentement. Il y a eu quelques progrès
dans les domaines de la planification et de l’administration, mais
ces progrès n’ont pas entraîne de benefices directs et significatifs
pour la population du Darfour.

>, a-t-il ajoute.

M. Ladsous a note que la situation humanitaire s’est nettement
deterioree en 2013, avec environ 400.000 personnes forcees de fuir,
ce qui porte le nombre total de deplaces a près de 2 millions.

Le Secretaire general adjoint a juge crucial de renforcer le dialogue
avec le gouvernement pour ameliorer l’accès aux populations touchees
par le conflit.

Retour a la rubrique

Source/Lien : ONU

http://www.collectifvan.org/article.php?r=0&id=78281
www.collectifvan.org

GDF Suez Signe Avec La Turquie En Vue De Futurs Projets Energetiques

GDF SUEZ SIGNE AVEC LA TURQUIE EN VUE DE FUTURS PROJETS ENERGETIQUES

TURQUIE

Gerard Mestrallet, PDG de GDF Suez, et Taner Yildiz, Ministre de
l’Energie et des ressources naturelles de Turquie, ont signe lundi
a Ankara, un protocole d’accord avec le gouvernement turc en faveur
d’une cooperation sur de futures initiatives energetiques en Turquie.

GDF Suez et le gouvernement turc se sont engages a cooperer et
apporter leur soutien afin de poursuivre les objectifs de croissance
et d’investissement dans le secteur energetique turc.

L’industriel francais entend ainsi renforcer sa presence en Turquie
grâce au projet de developpement nucleaire Sinop avec EUAS et ses
partenaires japonais et au projet Adana de centrale thermique d’une
capacite de 1.320 MW.

“Nous restons engages pour investir dans les grands projets
energetiques en Turquie et pour apporter notre soutien au Gouvernement
turc afin d’assurer la securite d’approvisionnement et de repondre
a l’augmentation de la demande energetique du pays. Grâce a notre
presence en Turquie et a notre expertise dans le secteur de l’energie,
GDF Suez est bien place pour fournir les infrastructures energetiques
d’envergure” a declare Gerard Mestrallet lors de la ceremonie de
signature.

mardi 4 fevrier 2014, Stephane (c)armenews.com

Manana Youth Center Wins Major UN Democracy Fund Grant in 2013

PRESS RELEASE
The Paros Foundation
918 Parker Street, Suite A14
Berkeley, CA 94710
Contact: Peter Abajian
Tel: (310) 400-9061
E-mail: [email protected]
Web:

MANANA YOUTH CENTER WINS MAJOR UNITED NATIONS DEMOCRACY FUND GRANT IN 2013
Multimedia Education Program Expands Countrywide

YEREVAN, ARMENIA–The Manana Youth Center won a major two-year grant from
the United Nation’s Democracy Fund, which enables the Manana Youth Center
to conduct a dozens of weeklong multimedia workshops for children
throughout Armenia.

“We have been working towards the goal of enabling all of country’s young
people to benefit from our proven educational programs.” Said Ruzan
Baghdasaryan, Executive Director of the Manana Youth Center. “Our
workshops will introduce basic skills in the areas of journalism,
photojournalism and filmmaking.”

Participants, under the supervision of our expert instructors, produced
films, shot photos and conducted interviews. An exhibition and film
screening was held in Gyumri in the fall to feature Manana student’s works
from the various regions. In 2014, these workshops will continue and a
curated final exhibition will be held in Yerevan.

In August, Manana Youth Center organized a crowd funding campaign on
Indiegogo and raised $5,000 for *Sand Animals*. The students of the Manana
Animation Studio are currently implementing this animation project.

“This is the seventh year The Paros Foundation is providing support to the
Manana Youth Center in the form of a grant for operational funding and
quality program and office space. Said Peter Abajian, Executive Director
of The Paros Foundation. “It is inspiring that the Manana team has
attracted prestigious funding for their training and the development of
specific creative projects. Providing these opportunities for Armenia’s
children encourages a young persons curiosity and his or her ability to
express themselves.”

Other 2013 milestones included the presentation of two feature film
documentaries at the Golden Apricot International Film Festival by Manana
Films, the film production division of Manana Youth Center.

*The Beginnings*, a co-production documentary with Turkey, directed by
Somnur Vardar, and *Hit The Road: India* – a travel adventure documentary,
recognized later as an amazing adventure film of 2013 by Vimeo and Vanity
Fair Italy were both well received by audiences. *Hit The Road: India* is
now being successfully distributed via major digital platforms and will be
broadcasted by several TV channels in 2014. The Manana film *Everyone, who
will meet me*, won the Highlight Award at Young Filmmaker International
Festival in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

The Manana Youth Center is located in Yerevan, Armenia and provides
multimedia training and afterschool education to 75 students ages 8 to 18
in the areas of filmmaking, journalism, photography and animation. Children
engage in these hands-on activities, but most importantly, the skills they
learn greatly improve their critical thinking.

In 2014 funding is needed to upgrade their equipment and to expand the
program for an additional 20 children. The Manana Youth Center depends on
support from the community and donors to meet its important mission. To
get involved please contact Peter Abajian (310) 400-9061; and, to
contribute please visit Support from The Paros
Foundation underwrites all administrative expenses allowing donor
contributions to be allocated directly to Manana’s student programs.

###


Warmest regards,
Peter J. Abajian
Executive Director
Paros Foundation
(093) 99-80-99 From US dial 011-374-93-99-80-99
US Cell (310) 400-9061
[email protected]

Be sure to visit our website at

http://www.parosfoundation.org/
www.mananayouth.org.
www.paros-foundation.org

ANKARA: Turkey, Germany Call For Talks On New Chapters

TURKEY, GERMANY CALL FOR TALKS ON NEW CHAPTERS

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
Feb 3 2014

3 February 2014 /İSTANBUL, TODAY’S ZAMAN

Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu and his German counterpart,
Frank-Walter Steinmeier, both stressed on Monday the need to open
talks on the EU accession chapters related to rights and freedoms, as
well as justice and security, saying that for Turkey to get over the
turbulence of recent developments that have shaken Turkey’s political
stability, talks on new chapters will be of crucial importance.

Speaking during a joint press conference after a bilateral meeting
with Steinmeier in Berlin, Davutoglu noted that if the EU wants to
be included in Turkey’s judiciary reforms and desires that Turkey’s
judicial reforms continue in line with EU standards, Chapters 23 and
24, which cover issues related to the judiciary, fundamental rights,
freedom and security, need to be opened. His remarks came amid EU
officials’ increasing concerns about the independence of the judiciary
in Turkey in the wake of the government corruption scandal that became
public on Dec. 17.

Steinmeier expressed Germany’s support for Turkey’s EU bid at the
conference. He said it is important to keep the EU’s door open to
Turkey following the corruption scandal and that he’s advocating for
the opening of two new components of the membership talks. He stressed
the need for the opening of the sections of Turkey’s membership
negotiations that address justice and human rights.

Though welcoming the opening of the talks on those two chapters, Ankara
is pressing the EU for further progress in the accession process by
also giving the green light for the opening of talks on additional
chapters. Turkey hopes for the opening of as many chapters as possible
because there are still 21 chapters that are as yet unopened.

Davutoglu and Steinmeier’s remarks came just ahead of Prime Minister
Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s two-day visit to Germany, beginning on Monday.

The visit is part of a flurry of activity to keep up the momentum
between Turkey and the EU that recently increased with the opening
of Chapter 22 on regional policy and coordination of structural
instruments and the newly signed agreements with the EU on visa
liberalization and readmission. Meetings with EU officials and visits
to EU countries have intensified considerably in recent weeks.

Davutoglu also underlined that Turkey is confident that Germany’s
role will boost Turkey-EU relations. “We believe that Germany’s
encouragement on this issue [Turkey’s accession process] will set off
a big reaction in Europe,” he said, underlining that Turkey expects
to proceed to a new phase in relations with the EU.

Bilateral relations between Turkey and Germany, Turkey’s bid to join
the union and the recent political unrest in Turkey are likely to
form the agenda of the meetings that Erdogan is expected to hold with
German officials that include Social Democratic Party (SPD) Chairman
Sigmar Gabriel and Steinmeier as well as Chancellor Angela Merkel.

Erdogan is likely to seek the support of German officials for Turkey’s
bid to become a full member of the EU.

However, although Turkey has been trying to refresh its relationship
with the EU, it has recently deteriorated following the exposure of
a corruption investigation and then was further damaged by a draft
bill to restructure the Supreme Board of Judges and Prosecutors
(HSYK). EU officials quickly expressed their uneasiness with the
government’s handling of recent developments and issued a number of
statements sharply criticizing the Turkish government. One of the
harshest remarks came from the German foreign minister, who signaled
in mid-January that Turkey’s negotiation process is at risk. He warned
Ankara to revise its stance on recent events or Turkey’s membership
negotiations with the EU may need to be suspended.

At the press conference, Davutoglu alluded to Steinmeier’s remarks,
saying that the two can discuss their opinions on the internal
developments of both countries openly and reciprocally.

While Erdogan was preparing to leave for Berlin, Germany’s Christian
Democratic Union (CDU) deputy Erika Steinbach said Erdogan should
apologize to Armenians for the events of 1915. According reports in
Turkish media citing a report of the German daily Bild, Steinbach
called on Erdogan not to deny the genocide committed against Armenians
and Assyrians by the Young Turk government of the Ottoman Empire.

ANKARA: Armenian Diaspora: Discovering Anatolia In Los Angeles

ARMENIAN DIASPORA: DISCOVERING ANATOLIA IN LOS ANGELES

Hurriyet Daily News, Turkey
Feb 3 2014

Print Page Send to friend ”

Share

Living in the diaspora and dealing with emotions of disconnect
and longing are very difficult to grasp for those who have never
lived away from their homes, wherever that ‘home’ may be. Whether
voluntary or forceful, physical separation from one’s homeland is a
major trauma that can morph into a perennial emotional longing. It
might go unnoticed or can be repressed in some cases but this psyche
reverberates a narrative of an imagined homeland noticeably amongst
collectives that were exiled or survived massive traumas. The diaspora
Armenians are prone to this nostalgic collective psyche pertaining to
the massive human resources and economic losses during the collapse
of the Ottoman Empire and after the fall of the Soviet Union.

There is plenty of discussion on the Armenian diaspora in Turkey, but
the lack of first hand experience is impeding potential interactions
with the diaspora. This is because of the misrepresentations and
miscommunication between Turkey and the diaspora. In Turkey the
dominant connotation linked to the Armenian diaspora is ‘radical’.

After a month in the field I hoped to assess the relevancy of this
prevailing perception and the intricate relationship between the
Turkish and the Armenian diaspora identity.

Perhaps the most significant challenges between Turks and diaspora
Armenians -other than both being trapped in conventional large-group
prejudices- have been the lack of interaction, dialogue and
communication. Although I had previous connections, my most distinct
encounter with the diaspora in their Southern California heartland,
the city of Glendale, was a step that epitomized my own fears. At
the same time it was a major confrontation of my expectations of
the diaspora. I had a certain image of what could be dubbed as
‘Little Armenia’ that I gathered from secondary resources such as
news articles, books, journals and other publications. After all, as
a former resident of the greater Los Angeles area I thought Glendale
would not be safe for Turks and that I should not be there perhaps
stemming from my own biases. More importantly, the now faded wave
of violence towards Turks, diplomats and civilians alike, was in the
back of my mind generating a certain typology of the diaspora. I was
soon to realize that my biases were not well grounded. In fact, my
month-long experience meeting with the diaspora Armenians was very
inspiring. Stepping foot in Glendale, was almost as if I was in an
Americanized Anatolian city, not too different than what I’m used
to seeing in Turkey. Kabob restaurants, coffee shops, small stores
and the Americana mall right on the Grand Avenue. The vivid image of
men playing backgammon, drinking coffee and women rushing from one
store to another shopping for the holidays reminded me of ‘home’. It
also resembled Chaussée de Haecht in Brussels where roughly every
other person on the street is of Turkish origin. I felt I fit in just
perfectly. The truth is my anxieties were relieved following my first
encounter in the all-Armenian Glendale. Surprisingly, even the thought
of visiting Turkey triggered similar fears amongst some diasporans.

Perhaps, a courageous first interaction is all it takes as I assured
my diasporan friends.

I asked myself ‘where is home’ for the, what is it like living in the
diaspora, where did they belong? I was able to meet diverse groups of
diaspora Armenians and listen to their stories. To my surprise, there
was a symbolic presence of Anatolia in Southern California through the
descendants of Adana, MaraÅ~_, Kayseri, MuÅ~_, Diyarbakır, Antep,
Elazıg and many more towns. Amongst those originally from these
towns, very few have ever paid a visit but this didn’t change the
fact that majority did have a strong emotional bond, an emotional
belonging that is not easy to describe. There was an imaginative,
pastoral description of the homeland transmitted from one generation
to the next one coupled with the enduring effect of loss and being
lost in the third space. It was not a strong longing but rather was
a reminiscence of the past particularly for those who seemed to be
politically more active. Perhaps the third space was represented in a
‘refugee mentality’.

It is unfair to take a holistic approach in defining the Armenian
diaspora; the community is not a monolithic entity. Indeed, there are
political and social diversities within the Armenian community in the
greater Los Angeles area. Yet, the feeling of injustice, nostalgia,
the traumatic past and the inability to form a certain belonging are
collective identity markers overarching diversities. Some diaspora
Armenians defined what they called a ‘compulsory exile’, as if they
still have their suitcases packed, almost ready to go back either
to their ancient homes or to the Republic of Armenia. This feeling,
together with the perception of an unresponsive approach of Turkey
towards their pain up until very recently has been containing
the diaspora in a space of nostalgia, even in a constant state
of mourning. It is a predicament that while the past should be
commemorated dwelling in the past and the symbolic preoccupation
with Turkey hampers diaspora’s efforts to construct a viable future
for the diasporan identity, but on the other hand it is a bond for
the identity that has a core narrative of victimization. On one hand,
it is up to the diaspora to find a constructive way out of this state
but also equally up to Turkey to relieve the diaspora of this pain
through groundbreaking initiatives.

Besides this feeling of being lost, identifying the existence of
the symbolic ‘Turk’ in the collective identity is puzzling. Even
for those who have not actually met a Turk before there is still a
certain perception. However, this is not a genuine interaction. During
one of my meetings a young diasporan said: ‘I was hesitant to join
this meeting and normally I have negative sentiments against Turks,
but you are cool and this conversation is going well’. Another said
she felt she is being heard. The views expressed by these diasporans
were very similar to my own self-fulfilling judgments and positive
experience that came afterwards meeting with the unknown territory of
the diaspora. Another diaporan said ‘I wouldn’t expect to have such
a nice conversation with a Turk, ever!’. This perhaps signified a
predicament of getting to know the ‘other’. Likewise, such an anxiety
of tackling an unknown space is present in the Turkish society. It
is somewhat due to the alienation from the past, and with that both
Turks and the diasporans are caught in the mechanism of hegemonic
narratives hindering dialogue efforts. To be precise, majority of
Turks are strangled in a one-sided history assessment and lack of
empathy while majority of diaspora Armenians seem to be preoccupied
with a sense of socio-political victimization and the overwhelming
power of certain political groups.

Nevertheless, through a first step of interaction Turks and the
diaspora will be able to recognize that neither is ‘dreadful’ and
can work on trust issues. As a result, the current alienation might
diminish and both Turks and the diaspora can rediscover their ‘home’.

As the alienation perishes Turks and the diasporans are more likely to
see one another from a healthier perspective that stems from personal
and societal experiences. Both the diaspora and Turkey are actually
going through major shifts in their approach towards one another, yet
neither society is fully aware of this changing dynamic. Regrettably,
the lack of communication is hindering the ability to see this
perspective thoroughly.

One of the biggest mistakes in assessing the diaspora is taking a
holistic approach and observing the society through the more strident
narratives and publications. Likewise, it seems like the diaspora
too will have a difficult time in making their point as long as the
dominant narrative is produced by strident political movements.

*Senem Cevik is Assistant Professor at Ankara University. This article
is based on the author’s field research in Los Angeles, U.S.A.

February/03/2014

http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/armenian-diaspora-discovering-anatolia-in-los-angeles.aspx?pageID=238&nID=61899&NewsCatID=396

Heritage Parliamentary Faction Appoints New Leader

HERITAGE PARLIAMENTARY FACTION APPOINTS NEW LEADER

13:57 * 03.02.14

The speaker of Armenia’s National Assembly has announced the name of
the opposition Heritage faction’s new leader.

Addressing the parliament on Monday, Hovik Abrahamyan said the Heritage
lawmakers made a decision to appoint Rubik Hakobyan their leader in
a recent meeting.

Tevan Poghosyan, another Heritage lawmaker who recently announced of
his intention to suspend his mandate and later decided to call it back,
will be Heritage’s secretary in parliament.

Armenian News – Tert.am

Armenian Opposition MP Slams Vorotan Cascade Deal

ARMENIAN OPPOSITION MP SLAMS VOROTAN CASCADE DEAL

13:35 * 03.02.14

An Armenian opposition lawmaker has criticized the government’s recent
deal to sell the Yerevan Cascade Hydro plant to a US company.

Speaking at the National Assembly on Thursday, Levon Zurabyan of the
opposition Armenian Congress said he finds the deal a violation of
the privatization law. He said the Government sold the hydroelectric
power plant to the US power company ContourGlobal without putting
the issue on the parliament’s agenda.

“We know the Government signed a deal with US firms by directly selling
the property to those companies. Well, we don’t see any problem about
a sales deal with US companies; the problem for us is that the law is
being violated. The law clearly says that only movable property can
be sold without any approval of the program. But the entire property
has been sold here in violation of the law,” he added.

Addressing Hovik Abrahamyan, the National Assembly’s speaker, Zurabyan
asked him if he doesn’t find such a position bad for the parliament’s
reputation.

Abrahamyan said he doesn’t share the opposition MP’s position, asking
him to avoid linking private affairs with the National Assembly’s
image, role or reputation. He promised to address the issue in case
the alleged violations of the privatization law prove true.

http://www.tert.am/en/news/2014/02/03/levon-zurabyan/