Heritage Response: President’s Attack Of Tsarukyan "Inappropriate"

HERITAGE RESPONSE: PRESIDENT’S ATTACK OF TSARUKYAN “INAPPROPRIATE”

POLITICS | 13.02.15 | 15:54

Photolure

GOHAR ABRAHAMYAN
ArmeniaNow reporter

RELATED NEWS

Raising the Stakes: Sargsyan ushers in new political conditions by
tackling former coalition partner

The Deputy Chairman of Heritage Party, Armen Martirosyan, told
reporters Friday that President Serzh Sargsyan’s comments about
Prosperous Armenia Party leader Gagik Tsarukyan were inappropriate.

(See related articles.)

Martirosyan, standing in for party chair Raffi Hovannisian who was
called to a meeting with Tsarukyan, told media that the president’s
attack of Tsarukyan changed the process of political developments.

“Political processes have changed; they gain speed and Armenia’s
government might speed up, Armenia becoming a North Korea might speed
up, I do not know which direction we will choose. Discussions will show
what will happen,” Martirosyan said adding that on February 18 is “the
second anniversary of false presidential elections, and that day Raffi
Hovanissian will meet the reporters, on the occasion of the second
anniversary he will make a speech and answer questions completely.”

According to Martirosyan, it is difficult for him to say what made
Sargsyan speak as he did, but he thinks that the government gets
nervous only when the matter refers to “the preservation of their
rule”.

“Our government gets nervous in relation to neither foreign problems
nor internal affairs; we have never witnessed the government getting
nervous because of the country’s horrible social-economic state,
they do get nervous when it is about their rule,” Martirosyan said
adding that Sargsyan’s words were everything but politics.

http://armenianow.com/news/politics/60614/heritage_party_armen_martirosyan_serzh_sargsyan_raffi_hovannisian

Prosperous Armenia Leader Demands Early Presidential Elections

PROSPEROUS ARMENIA LEADER DEMANDS EARLY PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS

February 13, 2015 13:49

Serzh Sargsyan and Gagik Tsarukyan

Photo: PAN Photo

Yerevan/Mediamax/. Leader of Prosperous Armenia Party Gagik Tsarukyan
addressed a speech at the session of the political board of the PAP
responding to Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan’s speech delivered
yesterday.

Leader of PAP noted that he would discuss “single package of joint
steps” with the leaders of the Armenian National Congress (ANC)
and Heritage Levon Ter-Petrosyan and Raffi Hovhannisyan

In his speech, Gagik Tsarukyan called Serzh Sargsyan “this man”.

The PAP leader advanced a number of claims concerning foreign and
domestic policies and social-economic situation to the authorities
and President in person.

Commenting on his exclusion from the National Security Council, Gagik
Tsarukyan stated that he in fact didn’t work in the structure for
already 6 months and “didn’t leave the structure upon his (President’s
– Mediamax) personal request”.

“The situation formed from yesterday needs to be handled. I am sure
that complete change of the power through early presidential elections
is the only solution”, stated Gagik Tsarukyan.

– See more at:

http://www.mediamax.am/en/news/politics/13185#sthash.c2HgG2bk.dpuf

Turkish Prime Minister Unveils Condition For Opening Border With Arm

TURKISH PRIME MINISTER UNVEILS CONDITION FOR OPENING BORDER WITH ARMENIA

YEREVAN, February 13. / ARKA /. Turkish prime minister Ahmet Davutoglu
said his government would open the sealed border with Armenia, but
on condition that Armenia returns at least one of several regions,
surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh, to Azerbaijan, Novosti-Armenia reported
citing RIA Novosti.

“If Armenians withdrew from at least one district, the border could be
opened,” Davutoglu said at a meeting with the leaders of non-Muslim and
non-governmental organizations in Ankara, according to Haber Turk TV.

He added that Armenians living in Turkey are part of the country and
should not suffer because of the strained relations between Ankara
and Yerevan. “The Armenian Diaspora is not an enemy to us, it is our
Diaspora,” he said.

Turkey and Armenia have no diplomatic relations. Turkey closed
its border with Armenia in 1993 in a show of support for its ally,
Azerbaijan, which had a dispute with Armenia over Nagorno-Karabakh,
the ethnic Armenian enclave of Azerbaijan then.

There are several sensitive issues complicating the establishment of
normal relations between the two countries, particularly, Ankara’s
blatant support for Azerbaijan in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict
resolution process and Turkey’s refusal to acknowledge the mass
killings of Armenians in the last years of the Ottoman Empire as
genocide. -0-

http://arka.am/en/news/politics/turkish_prime_minister_unveils_condition_for_opening_border_with_armenia/#sthash.PTt7pgAx.dpuf

Raffi Hovannisian Meets Polish Ambassador Jerzy Nowakowski

RAFFI HOVANNISIAN MEETS POLISH AMBASSADOR JERZY NOWAKOWSKI

13-02-2015 15:22:21 | Armenia | Politics

Yerevan–Raffi K. Hovannisian, Heritage Party chairman and founding
director of the Armenian Center for National and International Studies
(ACNIS), met today with H.E. Mr. Jerzy Nowakowski, Ambassador of
Poland in Armenia. They discussed a wide range of issues concerning
the country’s domestic and foreign policy, and exchanged views on
regional and geopolitical developments, discussed the place and role
of two countries, Poland and Armenia in the changing world. Heritage
Party Press Service

News from Armenia and Diaspora – Noyan Tapan

– See more at:

http://www.nt.am/en/news/202301/#sthash.NmstHq4I.dpuf

Report: Kocharyan May React To Sargsyan’s Statement

REPORT: KOCHARYAN MAY REACT TO SARGSYAN’S STATEMENT

POLITICS | 13.02.15 | 12:43

Raising the Stakes: Sargsyan ushers in new political conditions by
tackling former coalition partner

Robert Kocharyan may provide his reaction to the unusually strong
criticism of President Serzh Sargsyan against Prosperous Armenia Party
(PAP) leader Gagik Tsarukyan, the former president’s spokesman Victor
Soghomonyan said today, according to

“Kocharyan returned [to Armenia] last night, there has not been a
discussion yet. Today I will discuss [the matter] with him, and if
there is a need for a reaction, he will provide that reaction by all
means,” said the spokesman, according to the news website.

During a February 12 meeting of the Council of the ruling Republican
Party of Armenia, President Sargsyan lashed out at Tsarukyan,
describing his political activities as “evil” for the country.

Stressing the “ignorance and illiteracy” of Tsarukyan, Sargsyan
effectively urged the RPA to work towards ousting Tsarukyan from the
political arena.

PAP leader Tsarukyan was expected to respond to the criticism on
Friday afternoon.

Many in Armenia believe that Tsarukyan and the PAP are a political
support base for Kocharyan, who contemplates a return to active
politics. One of the obstacles to such a political comeback, many
experts believe, may be the constitutional reform initiated by the
Sargsyan administration and opposed by the PAP and other opposition
groups.

http://armenianow.com/news/politics/60597/armenia_serzh_sargsyan_kocharyan_pap_reaction
www.armtimes.com.

Tsarukyan Throws Down Gauntlet To Sargsyan: Calls For Complete Regim

TSARUKYAN THROWS DOWN GAUNTLET TO SARGSYAN: CALLS FOR COMPLETE REGIME CHANGE

13:38, February 13, 2015

In response to yesterday’s stinging attack by President Serzh Sargsyan
against his person and political capabilities, Gagik Tsarukyan upped
the stakes a bit more by publicly calling for regime change via snap
presidential elections.

The entire scenario some two weeks ago when a Prosperous Armenia Part
(BHK) party activist was seized off a Yerevan street, pushed into a
waiting car, and later beaten quite severely.

The BHK (Armenia’s second largest political party headed by Tsarukyan)
laid the full responsibility of the attack on the ruling Armenian
Republican Party (HHK) government.

This, in turn, lead to threats from the top echelons of the HHK to
the BHK that such accusations should be dropped or the consequences
would be dire.

Those consequences were stated yesterday in a speech by President
Sargsyan before senior members of the HHK.

Sargsyan personally derided Tsarukyan as an unfit political leader,
threatened to kick him out of parliament and ordered tax audits of
his multi-million dollar business empire.

In a statement issued today, Tsarukyan called on the people of Armenia
“to prepare for struggle”.

“When 3,000 people come out into the streets, they are forced to
modify the law. When all the people fill the streets, the regime
will change. I am now calling for a national mobilization with just
one goal in mind – using all legal means (round the clock rallies,
marches, and demonstrations, civil disobedience) to force Serzh
Sargsyan to leave office and thus rid the country of this menace.”

The use of the word “menace” by Tsarukyan in describing Sargsyan is
a direct comeback to the president’s remarks yesterday labeling the
BHK leader as “a menace for our country”.

Tsarukyan declared that the regime must leave forthwith and that
Armenia needed to clean itself of the suffocating environment in
which it finds itself.

“Today, I regard the most important work of my life to be liberating
Armenia from this regime of evil,” Tsarukyan concluded.

Tsarukyan also remarked that he will be meeting with representatives
of the opposition Armenian National Congress and the Heritage Party
for talks later today.

http://hetq.am/eng/news/58516/tsarukyan-throws-down-gauntlet-to-sargsyan-calls-for-complete-regime-change.html

Haykakan Zhamanak: President’s Speech Was Cold Shower For Political

HAYKAKAN ZHAMANAK: PRESIDENT’S SPEECH WAS COLD SHOWER FOR POLITICAL FIELD

10:53 13/02/2015 >> DAILY PRESS

“The speech of Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan at the RPA Council
meeting was a cold shower for the political field and everyone is
now asking: what will happen next? Some say unequivocally that Serzh
Sargsyan has declared a war against Prosperous Armenia leader Gagik
Tsarukyan. It will become clear soon what resources Tsarukyan has to
respond,” Haykakan Zhamanak writes.

Source: Panorama.am

BAKU: Alizade: Either Russia Falls Apart, Or Azerbaijanis Will Chang

ALIZADE: EITHER RUSSIA FALLS APART, OR AZERBAIJANIS WILL CHANGE

Turan Information Agency, Azerbaijan
February 10, 2015 Tuesday

Baku/10.02.15/Turan: The OSCE Minsk Group has done all its best:
contributed to the negotiation process, represented all reasonable
options, but the parties have not accepted them. The mediators can
do nothing more, said political scientist Zardusht Alizadeh in an
interview with Turan. He also noted that the State co-chairs are not
interested in resolving the conflict. Alizadeh said that the change in
the status quo depends on the government and the people of Azerbaijan.

If Azerbaijan wants to liberate Karabakh, it should make deep reforms,
a policy aimed at ensuring peace.

By freezing conflicts Russia is trying to keep the post-Soviet space
under its control, and the events in Ukraine is a bright proof of
this. Alizadeh is pessimistic about the prospects for its settlement.

“Either Russia will collapse, or the people of Azerbaijan must change.

But I do not see any political force capable of implementing these
changes,” said Alizadeh. Regarding the role of the United States, if
Washington wants it may violate stability, begin bloody conflicts, and
vice versa, if necessary, will begin peacekeeping process. In Karabakh,
the US do not what they can do,” said Alizadeh. He believes that if
Armenia comes out of the control of Russia, it will take more realistic
approach and compromise, and the conflict will be settled.–16C03-

Travel: Nagorno-Karabakh: The Land That Doesn’t Exist

NAGORNO-KARABAKH: THE LAND THAT DOESN’T EXIST

Wanderlust /MSN
Feb 6 2015

“This is the miracle of Gandzasar,” said Galust, pointing to a
missile embedded in the 13th-century mountaintop monastery where
locals say John the Baptist’s head is buried. “It hit,” said Galust,
“but never exploded.”

It was difficult reconciling the loveliness of this medieval
treasure’s valley location and exquisite 16-sided tambour, with the
bulletholes peppering its facade. Yet given the breakaway republic
of Nagorno-Karabakh’s recent history, following 70 years of Soviet
atheism, the real miracle of Gandzasar is that it remains standing
at all.

Nagorno nowhere

Nagorno-Karabakh, which perches like a jagged crown above northern
Iran, remerged after the USSR went supernova in the early 1990s and
sent breakaway Caucasus republics spiralling out of control like
rudderless sputniks. Chechnya, South Ossetia and Abkhazia remain
volatile. But a ceasefire between Karabakh separatists, their
Armenian allies and Azerbaijan, which fought for six years over
Nagorno-Karabakh, has held since 1994, allowing travellers to visit
what has become a de facto (although internationally unrecognised)
eastern extension of Armenia.

Stalin sowed the seeds of conflict in the region in 1921, pursuing
a policy of divide-and-rule to combat ethnic opposition within the
fledgling USSR. He severed predominately Christian Nagorno-Karabakh
from Armenia, and spliced it to the mainly Muslim Azerbaijan Soviet
Socialist Republic. The enclave sank into anonymity until Stalin’s
Machiavellian legacy came back to haunt the USSR’s disintegration,
when simmering ethnic tensions resurfaced.

Cradle of Christendom

It was from Armenia’s sun-drenched capital, Yerevan, that I made the
330km drive east into Nagorno-Karabakh: the only access corridor. With
me was Armenian guide, Galust Hovsepyan, whose world-weary countenance
belied his encyclopaedic brilliance for history and art.

In Yerevan we visited several poignant reminders of the 1988-94
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, such as the Mother Armenia Military Museum
and Yerablur Cemetery, where 7,000 Armenians are buried from a conflict
that cost 30,000 lives.

>From Yerevan it was a magnificent day’s drive through the cradle
of Christendom to reach Stepanakert, Nagorno-Karabakh’s capital. En
route, along Armenia’s Turkish border, roadside vendors sold sweet
watermelons, peaches, dried apricots and demijohns of areni wine.

Behind, snow-capped Mt Ararat rose 5,137m to a summit that allegedly
received Noah’s ark.

Mt Ararat was also annexed in 1921 to pacify Turkey but remains highly
auspicious to Armenians. On its foothills, at Khor Virap Monastery,
I clambered into a coal-black zindan (pit dungeon) where St Gregory
the Illuminator spent 13 miserable years imprisoned before emerging
to convert Armenia to Christianity in AD 301 – making it the world’s
first Christian nation.

Beyond Ararat the road soared above 2,000m onto Syunik’s rolling
golden prairie. It then entered the contentious Lachin Corridor, the
umbilical cord connecting Armenia and 4,400 sq km Nagorno-Karabakh
through now occupied Azerbaijan territory.

As we crossed over the River Ahavno, a border sign proclaimed ‘Welcome
to the Mountainous Republic of Karabakh’. However, the locals here
tend to call it Artsakh – nagorno (‘mountain’ in Russian) and karabakh
(‘black garden’ in Turkic) echo years of historic foreign domination.

A matter of life or death

There’s no obvious wartime hangover in modern Stepanakert, a vibrantly
breezy little capital that’s been industriously reborn. A youthful
population frequents airy boulevards of boutiques and cafes in a city
putting down roots. Living in a ceasefire zone seemed forgotten every
evening around the Armenia Hotel; on the former Soviet parade ground
of Renaissance Square, goose-stepping soldiers have been superseded by
promenading crowds. At 7pm I joined the nightly migration to Stepan
Shahumyan Park, where a funky fountain spewed in sync to musical
eclecticism – from Shostakovich to Shakira.

Stepanakert Museum holds evidence of centuries of Roman, Persian and
Turkic conquest. But raven-haired museum guide, Gayaneh, was keen to
reaffirm the territory’s Christian heritage, showing me khachkars,
medieval memorial stones finely decorated by geometric patterning
reminiscent of Celtic crosses.

When the war started, Gayaneh – then aged two – was evacuated to
Yerevan. “My father was a mathematician and stayed to fight as a tank
driver,” she said. This petite young woman told me she too would
fight for Artsakh. It reminded me of something I’d read by Russian
dissident Andrei Sakharov: ‘For Azerbaijan the issue of Karabakh is
a matter of ambition; for the Armenians of Karabakh, it is a matter
of life or death.’

“No country in the world recognises them,” Galust explained to us.

“But the Karabakh people are very stubborn and will never leave
these lands.”

“We Are Our Mountains” monument (Shutterstock)

Cultural corners

Over the next few days we sought out far-flung expressions of
Armenian culture in the form of secreted monasteries, fortresses
and ancient cities. First we visited the former capital Shushi, 10km
from Stepanakert. This mountaintop fortress tops the awe-inspiring
Karkar River canyon, the cliffs of which concertina into synclines as
if squeezed through a cook’s icing bag. Shushi’s war-damaged streets
showed glimpses of what once was an elegant multi-faith cosmopolitan
city: there were Persian inscriptions, Moorish Arabian arches and
the tiled minarets of 19th-century mosques. Shushi’s resident Muslim
Azeri worshipped here until recently, fleeing only in 1992 after
being overrun by Karabakh fighters in a ferocious battle that turned
the war in the latter’s favour.

Shushi’s restored 19th-century Ghazanchetsots Cathedral highlights
an interesting dichotomy. Nagorno-Karabakh’s reviving self-identity
centres on its Christian heritage yet during Soviet times practising
religion was forbidden so worship dwindled and churches fell into
disrepair.

After visiting Gandzasar’s hilltop medieval church, we took another
sublime drive to Dadivank Monastery. West of 3,340m Mrav Mountain,
we skirted south of Azerbaijan’s border into the Tartar Valley’s
fertile mosaic of fruit orchards and walnut groves. Here, the sparsely
populated villages contained abandoned Russian T-72 tanks and defunct
Soviet kolkhoz (collective farms). Indicative of the ever-present
Karabakh hospitality, an old man halted his donkey to press hazelnuts
into my hand with a toothless grin.

Galust hadn’t made this journey often so stopped to ask three old men
seated roadside how far Dadivank was. “Fifteen kilometres,” said one.

“Seventeen,” growled another. “It’s 20km!” the third exploded. “You’ve
both always talked rubbish.” When we returned two hours later, the
trio hadn’t budged.

Dadivank is completely unsigned and invisible from the road. Accessed
by a steep track onto a mountain terrace, the terracottacoloured
tenth-century building possesses the austere orthodoxy of mountainous
monasteries I’d seen in Greece and the Holy Land. “It was abandoned
and decayed during Soviet Azerbaijan rule. Not one rouble was spent
maintaining it,” complained Galust.

But the monastery touches the very nerve-ends of Christianity. Dadi,
a pupil of St Thaddeus (Jude the Apostle), is said to have travelled
to Armenia two millennia ago, spreading the gospel. The church was
originally built in the fourth century but rebuilt in medieval times.

Its antiquated decor comprises sumptuous bas-reliefs featuring Jude and
archaic Armenian script including a testament of Queen Arzou-Khatoun
bemoaning her sons’ martyrdom to Turkish invaders.

Unknown world wonder?

My adventures in the South Caucasus ended around eastern
Nagorno-Karabakh’s militarily imposed buffer zone within seized
Azerbaijan territory. It’s accessed via Askeran, where the turreted
wall of Mayraberd Fortress infills a valley like a row of yellowing
dentures. It was constructed by 16th-century Persian occupiers to
block access into Nagorno-Karabakh from the Caspian plains eastwards.

The monastery of Dadivank, Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (Shutterstock)

As I scrambled among the overgrown ruins, 75-year-old Zhora wandered
out from his garden of pomegranates and black grapes. “We used to
share Askeran with Azeris. We helped each other,” he said. “But it
became dangerous here in 1988 when there was violence. I was born
here and will never leave because my son was killed and buried here.”

Galust struggled to interpret Zhora’s dialect, which was flecked
with Russian and Farsi diction. But he understood his sentiments,
strident enough to suggest rapprochement with his former Azeri
neighbours remained distant.

Beyond Askeran, the mountains melted into the Caspian plain stretching
deep into sovereign Azerbaijan. Galust tuned in to an Azerbaijani
radio station while we gazed over Agdam, an Azeri ghost town, once
home to 80,000 people before being destroyed by Armenian forces.

Abandoned minarets poked above the rubble of shelled buildings.

(c) Provided by Wanderlust

The object of our journey was Tigranakert, a 2,000-year-old city that
may one day be celebrated as an ancient wonder of the world. For
now though, a small museum hosts just a fraction of the treasures
trickling from recent archaeological excavations. These reflect the
power of Armenian king, Tigram the Great, whose once formidable empire
(95-55BC) stretched from the Mediterranean to the Caspian. Marc Anthony
and then seventh-century Arab invaders later occupied Tigranakert
before its descent into obscurity.

“Tigranakert is unknown because there was a Soviet prison here so
it couldn’t be excavated until after the war,” explained Varham,
an onsite archaeologist. Most of the artefacts, coins, weapons and
tools are being catalogued in Yerevan. “The richness of these finds
and this architecture demonstrates that several thousand years ago
this was a major trading city between China and Arabia,” he added.

I hiked up to Tigranakert’s mountainside citadel and rested on
the remains of its first-century foundations as blistering hot
winds rasped the dry grass. I was totally alone bar scurrying sand
lizards and looping vultures. Such a vast empire, I reflected,
so completely forgotten. Then distant artillery fire from Armenian
military manoeuvres jolted me back from my heat-hazed daze into the
modern realpolitik of Nagorno-Karabakh.

“This status quo won’t change for some time but maybe in 20 years,
when the sentiments of war have died down, there can be an agreement,”
hoped Galust.

Nagorno-Karabakh remains controversial. And I was aware that, on my
travels, I hadn’t heard the Azerbaijani side of the argument. But
for now, this obscure breakaway republic, so rich in hospitality and
history, provides an absorbing offbeat break away.

The author travelled with Regent Holidays. Includes UK flights,
time in Yerevan, transportation to and around Nagorno-Karabakh,
most meals and a guide.

http://www.msn.com/en-ca/travel/news/nagorno-karabakh-the-land-that-doesnt-exist/ar-AA8nrmS

Lecture at NAASR March 5 on Plunder of Armenian and Jewish Propertie

PRESS RELEASE
National Association for Armenian
Studies and Research (NAASR)
395 Concord Avenue
Belmont, MA 02478
Tel.: 617-489-1610
E-mail: [email protected]

COMPARISON OF PLUNDER OF PROPERTIES DURING
ARMENIAN GENOCIDE AND HOLOCAUST IN NAASR LECTURE

Umit Kurt of Clark University will present a talk entitled
“‘Legal’ and ‘Official’ Plundering of Armenian and Jewish Properties
During the Armenian Genocide and Holocaust: A Comparative
Perspective,” on Thursday, March 5, 2015, at 7:30 p.m., at the
National Association for Armenian Studies and Research (NAASR) Center,
395 Concord Ave., Belmont, MA 02478.

The state-orchestrated plunder of Armenian and Jewish property
immediately impoverished its victims; this was simultaneously a
condition for and a consequence of the Armenian Genocide and
Holocaust. As the historian of Nazi looting and plundering of Jewish
property Martin Dean writes, ethnic cleansing and genocide usually
have a “powerful materialist component: seizure of property, looting
of the victims, and their economic displacement are intertwined with
other motives for racial and interethnic violence and intensify their
devastating effects.”

A series of laws and decrees as well as complex bureaucratic
mechanisms were created in the Ottoman-Turkish Republican and Nazi
Germany periods concerning the administration of the belongings of the
deported or killed Armenians and Jews. This presentation aims at
analyzing and comparing the processes of expropriation of these two
victim groups. In doing so, it will examine how the properties of
Armenians and Jews changed hands under a veneer of legality. The
presentation will discuss similarities and differences between the two
dispossession processes.

Umit Kurt is a Ph.D. candidate in history at Clark University and
a lecturer at Sabancý University. A 2014 recipient of a Gulbenkian
Foundation Armenian Studies Scholarship, his main area of interest is
the confiscation of Armenian properties and the role of local
elites/notables in Aintab during the Armenian Genocide, 1915-1921. He
is the author of numerous historical and political articles in
scholarly journals and newspapers including Nations and Nationalism,
Turkish Studies, Turkish Review, Culture and Religion, Turkish Policy
Quarterly, Turkish Journal for Politics, Tarih ve Toplum Yeni
Yaklaþýmlar, Birikim, Toplumsal Tarih, Cogito, Taraf, Radikal, and
Bianet. He is the author of several books in Turkish and co-author
with Taner Akçam of Kanunlarýn Ruhu: Emval-i Metruke Kanunlarýnda
Soykýrýmýn Ýzlerini Sürmek (The Spirit of the Laws: The Plunder of
Wealth in the Armenian Genocide), to be published in English in April
2015 by Berghahn.

For more information about Umit Kurt’s talk contact NAASR at
617-489-1610 or [email protected].

Belmont, MA
Feb. 12, 2015