Merkel Strictly Opposes Turkey’s EU Bid

MERKEL STRICTLY OPPOSES TURKEY’S EU BID

PanARMENIAN.Net
September 20, 2011 – 20:23 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – Chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel has opposed
Turkey’s full membership in the European Union.

She announced this on the eve of a meeting with Turkish President
Abdullah Gul.

“However, we do not wish to lose Turkey as an important strategic
partner,” said the head of the German government. In her opinion, the
EU should find ways to build closer political cooperation with Turkey.

Abdullah Gul, who is now on an official visit to Germany, spoke
at Berlin’s Humboldt University, where he stressed that Ankara’s
strategic goal for the foreseeable future is to join the EU.

His speech was postponed for several hours due to a bomb threat which
was further revealed to be false, The Voice of Russia reported.

New Book: Selected Works Of Garegin Nzhdeh (English)

GAREGIN NZHDEH – SELECTED WORKS IN ENGLISH
by Antranig Bedrossian

Sep 20, 2011

The following is the Introduction to the Book Selected Works of
Garegin Nzhdeh

President of ‘Nakhijevan’ Institute of Canada, Montrea, 10 September
2011

[AntranigB.jpg] These Selected Works of Garegin Nzhdeh have been chosen
for an English translation for the first time. The texts represent his
thoughts as well as his political and philosophical approaches. They
cover the period from the early 1920s till his prison writings, in a
Soviet prison camp, in the mid-’50s. They also include an interview
(1943) with Nzhdeh by “Razmik” newspaper of Sofia and a testimony by
Nzhdeh. A chronological survey of his life and work, bibliographical
sources and a glossary of place names complete this volume.

The selected writings reflect the evolution of his thoughts shaped by
the turbulent political events and the intense ideological battles
that characterized most of the 20th century in the Armenian and
international political scene. The Armenian national liberation
struggle of late 19th and early 20th centuries, the worldview of the
Armenian Revolutionary Federation (Dashnaktsutiun), the struggle
for survival of the First Republic of Armenia, and subsequently,
its forced partition and sovietization had their impact upon the
development of his political thinking and philosophy. Nzhdeh witnessed
the collapse of the Ottoman Turkish and Tsarist Russian Empires,
faced the destruction and the dispossession of Western Armenians
during the First World War. He participated in the struggle for the
independence and territorial unity of the first Republic of Armenia,
and saw its forced partition, sovietization and its incorporation
into the Soviet Union. Finally, as part of the Diaspora, he joined
the struggle for national survival, experienced the Second World
War and always focused on Armenia’s preservation and territorial
unity. His fame was kept alive in the popular memory of Armenia,
despite the prohibition of his name during the Soviet era (1921-1990).

Nzhdeh possessed a strong personality and embodied three prominent
talents: that of an orator, military strategist and philosopher.

These attributes made him one of the outstanding Armenian political
and military leaders of the first half of the 20th century. His
political and intellectual achievements acquired significance, his
legacy spreading during his lifetime and after.

As a political and military leader, Nzhdeh played an important
role in shaping the outcome of some of these events of modern
Armenian history. He played a major role in organizing and leading
the Armenian forces into reversing the trend in the battle of
[Nzdeh.jpg] Gharakilisa in 1918, which became pivotal along with
the decisive battles of Sardarabad and Bash-Abaran fought against
the Ottoman Turkish army (Hambardzumian, 2005). The victorious
struggle for Zangezur (1920 to 1921) under his leadership against
the combined forces of the Red Army and Turco-Tatar reinforcements,
secured for Armenia her southern territories in Siunik (Zangezur),
bordering Iran thus creating a wedge between Turco-Tatars of eastern
South Caucasus (subsequently identified as Azerbaijanis) and Turks of
Turkey (Lernahayastani goyamarte, “Mountainous Armenia: the Battle
for Survival”, 1923). His organization of the National Covenant
(“Tseghakron”) movement, which constituted later the basis of the
founding of the Armenian Youth Federation of the United States and
Canada, affiliated with the A.R.F., prevented the assimilation of
thousands of Armenian youth.

According to R. Hampardzumian (2007), the texts point to his ideology:
Christian Armenianism whose self-defence system focuses on David Bek’s,
St.Vartan’s and the Mamikonian Covenant, revived by him in the ’20s
and the ’30s.

In this volume Nzhdeh raises many political, strategic, historical
and social issues pertaining to the Armenian people in particular
and to international developments in general. His Prison Writings and
Self-Testimony reflect the culmination of his thoughts, reinforced by
his experience. The selected texts also indicate Nzhdeh’s acquaintance
with his contemporary European political, military and philosophical
currents of thought. Certainly, Nzhdeh approaches many of these issues
with clear perspective of his own and formulation.

The debate between spiritualism and materialism; the role of the state
in politics; the relationship between the individual, the nation and
the state; the role of history, culture and ancestral territory in
nation-building; the value of social justice in human societies; the
interrelationship between national and universal values; the role of
intellectual, spiritual and military elites in shaping the national
life of peoples are issues discussed by Nzhdeh.

They are all relevant today. Indeed, today the debate around these
issues is conducted within the interwoven and multifaceted relations
of the world and within the parameters of new theoretical approaches
and empirical results.

The strengths and weaknesses of the Armenian people; education,
self-knowledge and the spiritual renewal of Armenian generations;
unity among various Armenian currents of thought; the emancipation of
the Armenian homeland forcefully incorporated into the Republic of
Turkey (Western Armenia) are also issues addressed by Nzhdeh. These
also are presently part of the discussion agenda among Armenians,
albeit, under more complex objective and subjective conditions.

Moreover, his thoughtful and realistic analysis of Armenia’s strategic
priorities and security threats has a contemporary significance in
light of recent geopolitical transformations in the South Caucasus.

His philosophical inclination is best reflected in his aphorisms,
characterized by its fragmented, but deeply reasoned style.

Nzhdeh’s style is fragmentary, but his reasoning is powerful and
complete. Few, very few people speak, write or act with “blood and
vein”. His writings are the psychological features of a distinctively
temperamental and powerful individuality, which are remarkable for
their unique style and pious qualities of expressed ideas and truths
(Hayk Asatrian, philosopher and one of his closest companions-in-arm).

The texts reveal a talented writer, who with newly-coined words and
with new styles of representing them, enriched the Armenian language.

“His colourful thinking reminds us of Yeghisheh, the 5th century
Armenian historian; the mystic Grigor Naregatsi among ancient
writers; Hakob Oshakan and Avetis Aharonian, among modern
writers”(Hambardzumian, 2007).

Aphorisms of Nzhdeh preserve a value of reflection for the
new generations of Armenians and inspire them with patriotism,
self-knowledge, self-confidence and self-reliance. By singling out
a few of them, their contemporary relevance can be seen outright:

“History, it is not an unfinished novel but an unfinished battle.”

What an eloquent way to prepare the Armenian long-term struggle for
the recovery of the lost homeland!

“The more socially just, the more powerful is the fatherland.” Here
isa guiding idea upon which to anchor the state-building processes
of post-soviet Republic of Armenia and Artsakh!

“Sword or pen? As one as well as the other – both I liked and used.

But I appeared before an alternative and I had to choose the first
because there are times when to advance, pen, word, truth need a
sword. I like the pen, which at the same time is a sword that knows how
to raise thousand arms with swords to defend justice.” This resumes
Nzhdeh’s life, but it also describes the hard and complementary
choices facing the Armenian people in their historical journey to
their homeland.

Finally, this publication of Selective Works of Garegin Nzhdeh make
available to scholars, researchers, students and general readers the
political, military and philosophical reflections of a great 20th
century Armenian patriot, while paving the way for further studies
into his worldview and his relevance to posterity. Comparative links
between European political, military and philosophical currents of
thought and his approaches can be explored further.

———————————

To obtain a copy of Selected Works of Garegin Nzhdeh contact Antranig
Bedrossian at [email protected] The Cost is Can. $ 22.00 plus
shipping and handling

http://www.keghart.com/Bedrossian-Nzhdeh

Armenian Exports In 2011 August Surge By 30.6% Year-On-Year To $117.

ARMENIAN EXPORTS IN 2011 AUGUST SURGE BY 30.6% YEAR-ON-YEAR TO $117.3 MILLION

ARKA
Sep 20, 2011

YEREVAN, September 20. / ARKA /. Armenian exports in 2011 August
surged by 30.6% year-on-year to $117.3 million (43.1 billion drams),
while imports rose by 23.5% to $395.8 million (145.2 billion drams),
according to numbers released today by the country’s National
Statistical Service. Compared to 2011 July the exports in August rose
by 10.4% while imports jumped by 31.2%.

Armenia’s foreign trade in 2011 August saw a 25.1% rise from a year
earlier to $513.1 million or 188.3 billion drams. In August foreign
trade rose by 10.4% from July. The negative trade balance in August
was $278.5 million or 102.1 billion drams. The average exchange rate
of one US Dollar in August was 367.07 drams.

Expert: U.S. Will Never Recognize Armenian Genocide

EXPERT: U.S. WILL NEVER RECOGNIZE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

arminfo
Tuesday, September 20, 17:59

The United States will never recognize the Genocide of Armenia
especially considering Washington’s plans to deploy early warning radar
in the territory of Turkey, Aristakes Simavoryan, expert at Noravank
Research and Educational Fund, Director of Armenian Studies Center,
said in a press conference in Yerevan, Tuesday.

USA’s attempts to station the radar in Turkey shows that Washington
and Ankara are establishing closer relations. In addition, he said, as
long as USA wants to influence Iran through its radars, the US-Turkey
relations will hardly deteriorate because of the Genocide issue.

“For the USA recognition of the Armenian Genocide is just a political
instrument to exert pressure on Turkey,” the expert said.

Earlier on Sept 14 Turkey and the U.S signed the agreement to deploy
the European missile defense system (MDS) in Turkey. According to the
agreement, the radar will be placed on the Kurecik base in the Turkish
city of Malatya. The Pentagon has said the radar will be operational
by the end of 2011 and will be linked to ballistic missile defense
ships operating in the Mediterranean Sea. A high-ranking Turkish
military officer is expected to be posted to a NATO anti-ballistic
team stationed in Germany.

Genocide of Armenians has been recognized by 44 United States as
well as by 21 countries, including Canada, Argentina, Switzerland,
Uruguay, Russia, Belgium, France, Poland, Slovakia, the Netherlands,
Greece, Cyprus, Vatican, Sweden, Lithuania.. The European Parliament
passed a resolution recognizing the fact of Armenian Genocide in the
Ottoman Turkey on June 18 1987 and demanded the Council of Europe
to exert pressure on Turkey in order that country recognizes the
Armenian Genocide. Turkey still denies the genocide of 1,5 million
Armenians in 1915-1923.

Issues On The Armenian-American Military Cooperation Discussed

ISSUES ON THE ARMENIAN-AMERICAN MILITARY COOPERATION DISCUSSED

ARMENPRESS
15:25, 20 September, 2011

On September 20, Armenian Defense Minister Seyran Ohanyan received
the delegation headed by the Head of Kansas Army National Guard
major-general Lee Tafanelli. Charge d’Affaires of the US Embassy in
Armenia Bruce Donahue also attended the meeting.

DM press service said during the meeting they discussed issues on the
Armenian-American military cooperation, particularly the prospect
of broadening the cooperation with Kansas Army National Guard. The
parties have noted with satisfaction that over the last eight years
much work has been done in deepening the cooperation between Kansas
Army National Guard and the ARM Defense Ministry.

Charge d’Affaires of the US Embassy in Armenia Bruce Donahue and
the Head of Kansas Army National Guard major-general Lee Tafanelli
congratulated the Armenian Defense Minister Seyran Ohanyan on 20th
anniversary of the Armenia’s independence and wished him success in
his responsible job.

Armenia To Finalize Preparations For Starting Deep And Comprehensive

ARMENIA TO FINALIZE PREPARATIONS FOR STARTING DEEP AND COMPREHENSIVE FREE TRADE AGREEMENT NEGOTIATIONS WITH EU

ARKA
July 27

YEREVAN, July 27. / ARKA /. By the end of this year Armenia plans to
finalize preparations for starting negotiations with the European
Union on the deep and comprehensive free trade agreement, Armenian
economy minister Tigran Davtian said.

He said there are several requirements for starting negotiations,
including revision of standardization, metrology, hygiene and
protection of intellectual property systems and removal of other
trade obstacles.

“We have to enforce systemic changes related to European integration
management processes. More precisely, we have to form appropriate
substructures within the government system,” he said.

The minister stressed that a great deal of work was done in all these
directions, and it is important that these changes be implemented
in practice.

The possibility of such an agreement is a key element of the EU’s
Eastern Partnership program that offers six former Soviet republics
much closer integration with the 27-nation bloc in return for political
and economic reforms.

The association talks between Armenia and EU were formally opened
in 2010 July 19. The agreement would entitle Armenia to a permanent
free trade regime with the EU and facilitate visa procedures for its
citizens travelling to Europe. The EU says democratization, human
rights protection and a stronger rule of law are necessary conditions
for Armenia’s participation in the Eastern Partnership.

Bako Sahakian: "It Is Pleasant That Regular Elections Are Held In A

BAKO SAHAKIAN: “IT IS PLEASANT THAT REGULAR ELECTIONS ARE HELD IN A CIVILIZED MANNER IN OUR COUNTRY”
Laura Grigorian

Tuesday, 20 September 2011 09:43

On September 18, municipal elections took place in our Republic, as a
result of which community leaders and members of the Elders’ Council
were elected in 209 communities. In the capital town of Stepanakert
and regional centers of Martuni, Martakert and Berdzor, elections of
community leaders and members of the Elders’ Council took place; in
Askeran, Hadrut, and Shushi, only members of the Elders’ Council were
elected; elections didn’t take place in Karvachar. Municipal elections
are held in Artsakh for the fifth time. The first time, they were
held in our Republic in 1998 and later – three times every three years.

According to international standards, the level of the population’s
participation in the elections was quite high – 60-65%.

As of 8:00 am in the September 18 morning, when the elections started,
the voters’ lists included 93.102 citizens. For ensuring their right to
vote on a proper level, 251 election districts were formed. 48 election
districts are available just in the Kashatagh region. In this context,
Kashatagh exceeds the other regions of the Republic and its capital
(34). As required, at 8:00 in the morning, the election commissions’
chairs at all the election districts announced the start of the
elections, and the districts started receiving the voters.

In the morning, the country’s authorities also fulfilled their civil
duty. President of the Artsakh Republic Bako Sahakian and Prime
Minister Ara Harutyunian voted at election district 24 located at
Stepanakert school #5. That time, the elections were passing calmly
and without any haste in the noted district. According to commission
chairman Vanik Ghazarian, by 11:00 am, 100 of 1354 voters had already
voted. No violations or complaints were fixed.

The statesmen voted both as Stepanakert citizens and state leaders. In
his interview to journalists, President Bako Sahakian expressed his
satisfaction with the election culture developed in our Republic.

“We consider important any elections in our country, including
municipal elections. It is very pleasant that regular elections are
held in our Republic in a civilized manner, within the law and moral
standards”, noted the President. According to the head of state, these
elections will be a step forward as a constituent of the election
processes and as a means of establishing the local self-government
system. “We try to have such community leaders who are able to fulfill
their duties in accordance with the communities’ demands. And the
process, which is available in our life, I mean the election process,
lets us hope that we’ll use the elections for electing such community
leaders who are able to research deeply the local problems and to
resolve them in the future. I think it is a continuous process and
we see progress from elections to elections”, said Bako Sahakian.

Answering the question on the activity of the acting Mayor of
Stepanakert, President Sahakian said, “I had chances to evaluate the
Mayor’s activity and I consider that for the recent years, the Mayor
and generally the Mayor’s Office staff have succeeded in resolving
some issues of social significance for the population, in particular,
that of water supply. These years, natural disasters took place, the
consequences of which were shortly removed. Generally, I estimate that
activity as adequate. I think that the Stepanakert citizens also had
the chance to observe the works and give the corresponding evaluation”.

Answering the question for which candidate the head of state had voted,
President Sahakian said, “I have voted for those who can fulfill
their duties after being elected, who are vested with knowledge and
experience. I am sure that they will carry out their duties on a
high level”.

http://artsakhtert.com/eng/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=343:bako-sahakian-it-is-pleasant-that-regular-elections-are-held-in-a-civilized-manner-in-our-country&catid=1:all&Itemid=1

Ergenekon Plot Link Alleged In Dink’s Murder

ERGENEKON PLOT LINK ALLEGED IN DINK’S MURDER

Tert.am
09:29 20.09.11

The assassination of Turkish-Armenian journalist Hrant Dink may
be connected to the ongoing Ergenekon coup-plot case, the Turkish
newspaper Hurriyet Daily news reported, citing the tiral’s chief
prosecutor.

“The assassination of Hrant Dink is the latest assassination enacted
by the deep [state.] The suspects acted with ideological motivations.

The Turkish Republic and public order [were] the targets. There
are [reasons] to suspect that the murder is connected to the
Ergenekon organization,” said the chief prosecutor who requested life
imprisonment for suspected conspirators Yasin Hayal and Erhan Tuncel
on Monday.

Meanwhile, Hrant Dink’s acquintances and his family’s lawyers stormed
out of the courtroom when the chief prosecutor requested to state
his opinion on the case, claiming that many of their requests had
not been met over the course of the trials.

“Not an inch of progress has been made in five years. [The authorities]
do not want to investigate the truth behind this murder,” said Fethiye
Cetin, a lawyer for the Dink family.

It was unacceptable for the judge to grant the prosecution permission
to issue his opinion before the collection of all the evidence,
Cetin said.

The family’s lawyers had earlier demanded that the trial be merged
with the Ergenekon case but the request was rejected by the court.

Yerevan Traders Ready To Go To Court, Block All Entrances To Pedestr

YEREVAN TRADERS READY TO GO TO COURT, BLOCK ALL ENTRANCES TO PEDESTRIAN UNDERPASS

epress.am
09.20.2011 11:09

If Yerevan City Hall declares Antsum-1 (“pass” or “crossing”) CJSC –
which has proposed 455 million drams (about $1 million 214 thousand
USD) to revive the Abovyan-Koryun pedestrian underpass – as the winner
of the tender, then the vendors working in the underground passage are
preparing to block all entrances to the underpass and wait for that
“best and wealthy man.”

This group of vendors, who might soon be prohibited from trading
in the underpass, was protesting outside city hall on Monday. Note,
these vendors primarily sell flowers, clothes and foodstuffs.

City hall has announced a tender for that area, and bids by three
applicants have been made: Getnantsum (“underground passage”) CJSC,
which was established by the traders themselves, who have offered 255
million drams (about $680,327 USD); the 455 million drams proposed
by Antsum-1 CJSC; and a businessman by the name of Ashot Ohanyan
(pictured below), who has offered 400 million drams (about $1 thousand
67 thousand USD).

Protestors told Epress.am that they will “fight till the end.”

“Definitely we’ll take them to court; we won’t leave it in this
rudimentary way – how would [you feel if] one day they come to your
house and say we are going to renovate and you won’t be living here
anymore. We won’t give in; we will continue till the end. We have
already prepared the documents: contracts, receipts, our expenses.

About six months ago, they came from city hall, they said if you gather
22 million drams [about $58,700 USD] we’ll renovate it. We gathered it,
gave it to city hall for them to renovate, and they promised us they
would extend our contracts, but they came and made an insignificant
change – what they did definitely did not cost 22 million. And now
they say, what renovation is this? But they’re the ones who did
it. Now it’s the other version of the racket [fraudulent scheme];
they’ve put out an auction. If they’re selling it, we can buy it,
renovate it how it should be. We know that if someone comes, he’s
from their entourage,” one protestor, a 35-year-old man, told the
Epress.am correspondent on the scene.

Also speaking to Epress.am was Gagik Badalyan, another trader in the
underpass, who said that if a decision was made not in their favor,
they are preparing to take extreme measures.

“I can’t say what decision will be made tomorrow, but if it’s decided
suddenly that Antsum-1 has won – I haven’t decided this, we’ve all
decided it – we will close the underpass from all sides and stay
in the underpass, wait and see who is the best and richest man in
Armenia who wants to deprive people of their livelihood,” he said.

The winner of the tender is set to be announced on Tuesday.

Genocide Armenien: Une Nouvelle Etude De Vahakn Dadrian

GENOCIDE ARMENIEN: UNE NOUVELLE ETUDE DE VAHAKN DADRIAN

Collectif VAN

20-09-2011

Le Collectif VAN vous invite a lire cette information traduite par
Georges Festa et publiee sur le site ‘Armenian Trends – Mes Armenies’
le 18 septembre 2011.

Armenian Trends – Mes Armenies

dimanche 18 septembre 2011

Genocide armenien / The Armenian Genocide – Vahakn Dadrian

Photo: Vahakn Dadrian

Une nouvelle etude de Vahakn Dadrian publiee par la Faculte de Droit
de l’Universite de Saint-Thomas

Massis Weekly, 27.08.2011

MINNEAPOLIS – Le dernier numero paru du Journal of Law and
Public Policy de l’Universite Saint-Thomas (2011, vol. 5, n° 1)
(1) contient une nouvelle etude dans laquelle le professeur Vahakn
Dadrian, directeur de recherche sur le genocide a l’Institut Zoryan,
analyse le genocide armenien dans un contexte neuf. Intitule ” The
Armenian Genocide : A Review of its Historical, Political, and Legal
Aspects ” [Le genocide armenien : une approche historique, politique
et juridique], l’article aborde les soubassements historiques et
politiques du caractère criminel du genocide armenien.

Cet article consistant, long de quelque soixante pages, y compris
118 notes en bas de page, se fonde sur des sources officielles
turques ottomanes, dont plusieurs numeros du Takvim-i Vekâyi,
l’organe officiel du Parlement ottoman, qui fait etat des tribunaux
militaires de l’après-Première Guerre mondiale, charges de poursuivre
les perpetrateurs du genocide armenien. Dadrian ancre ainsi son analyse
documentaire sur des preuves materielles de premier ordre. Materiau qui
est renforce par une profusion de materiaux confirmant les donnees,
issus des archives officielles de l’empire allemand et de l’empire
austro-hongrois, allies politiques et militaires de la Turquie durant
la guerre. Dadrian s’appuie aussi sur l’~uvre de plusieurs auteurs
turcs contemporains.

” La maîtrise hors pair des langues et des sources par Dadrian rend
insurpassable sa capacite a reconstituer et analyser les questions
historiques, politiques et juridiques fondamentales liees a l’etude
du genocide armenien “, note K. M. Greg Sarkissian, president de
l’Institut Zoryan.

Un rapide panorama de l’ère pre-genocidaire explore le modèle
historique d’impunite dont beneficia toute la gamme des decideurs,
des organisateurs et des perpetrateurs effectifs de plusieurs series
de massacres. Massacres infliges a la population armenienne de l’empire
ottoman durant les periodes 1894-1896, 1903-1904 et en 1909 a Adana.

Ce fait central de l’impunite servit a souligner le rôle du facteur
de la vulnerabilite des victimes comme un determinant majeur dans
la prise de decision du genocide. En fait, comme le relève Dadrian,
il contribua a enhardir les decideurs et les executants du genocide
ulterieur lors de la Première Guerre mondiale.

Autre facteur crucial dans le deploiement du programme de genocide
en temps de guerre, l’ensemble devastateur de circonstances qui
entourèrent les cuisantes defaites militaires subies par les Ottomans
durant la première guerre balkanique en 1912. L’angoisse, la detresse
et plus particulièrement la brutalite qu’infligèrent les armees
chretiennes victorieuses de la peninsule balkanique a l’encontre
des masses musulmanes indigentes, tentant de fuir, s’averèrent un
prejudice majeur lors du ciblage ulterieur de la population armenienne
vulnerable de l’empire ottoman, via des accès differes de vengeance.

De fait, une grande partie des groupes perpetrateurs impliques
dans le cataclysme armenien de la Première Guerre mondiale etaient
constitues de refugies musulmans spolies, amers et emplis de haine,
issus des guerres balkaniques precedentes.

Dans cette etude, le genocide armenien est presente comme une
consequence directe de l’adoption d’une ideologie radicale, dont les
principaux concepteurs et executants furent les cadres dirigeants de
ces groupes compacts de refugies balkaniques.

Parmi l’ensemble des facteurs qui facilitèrent la mise en ~uvre
effective du genocide figure celui de l’opportunite. Etant donne la
nature complexe du crime de genocide, l’A. soutient qu’un succès
optimal dans l’organisation d’un tel crime exige un opportunisme
maximal. Non seulement les marges d’action et les ressources du
perpetrateur doivent etre le moins refrenees, mais, tout aussi
important, la vulnerabilite du groupe cible doit etre a un niveau très
eleve. Les guerres, en particulier les guerres globales, tendent, a
cet egard, a proposer des opportunites quasi maximales. Les necessites
en temps de guerre tendent ordinairement non seulement a maximiser
la vulnerabilite du groupe victime, qui est astreint par son statut
de minorite, mais en meme temps a compliquer et souvent contraindre
le problème de l’intervention exterieure en faveur du groupe cible.

Les guerres constituent des boulevards d’opportunisme eminemment
favorables au regard de la montee de la preeminence instrumentale des
cadres militaires au sein d’un camp perpetrateur potentiel. Grâce a
eux, la violence n’est pas seulement concentree parmi les experts,
mais, plus important encore, ce genre de violence possède, par
tradition, la sanction d’une quasi legitimite, sinon une legitimite
pleine et entière, dans la mise en ~uvre d’une violence mortelle
visant des cibles presentees par l’autorite legitime comme ” ennemis
interieurs “. Il est a noter que les deux genocides majeurs du siècle
dernier, l’armenien et le juif, furent perpetres durant deux guerres
mondiales.

Un des traits les plus marquants du genocide armenien est lie a
ses dimensions economiques, via lesquelles eut lieu un transfert
massif de richesses, des victimes aux perpetrateurs. En ce sens, le
genocide fonctionne ici a un double niveau. L’elimination physique de
la population victime aboutit a faire emerger une nouvelle source de
richesse, et a travers elle les cadres nouveaux de classes prospères au
sein du camp perpetrateur. Dans le chapitre consacre a l’expropriation
et a la confiscation des biens et capitaux, l’A.

recense et analyse a travers de nombreux materiaux-source les
specificites de cette operation meurtrière de transfert de richesses,
des victimes aux perpetrateurs.

L’etude s’achève significativement par une evocation de la suprematie
du droit en tant que regulateur du comportement humain et, comme tel,
element humanisant de la vie civile. Rappelant cette maxime d’Aristote
: ” Eloigne du droit et de la justice, l’homme est le pire de tous
les animaux. ”

NdT

1.

___________

Source : Massis Weekly Traduction : © Georges Festa – 09.2011

Retour a la rubrique

Source/Lien : Armenian Trends – Mes Armenies

http://www.stthomas.edu/law/programs/studentorgs/organizations/jlpp/Publications/Vol5num1.html
www.collectifvan.org