Agricultural Alliance To Be Created In Armenia

AGRICULTURAL ALLIANCE TO BE CREATED IN ARMENIA

Vetsnik Kavkaza
Dec 5 2011
Russia

Local and international organizations involved in the field of
Armenian agriculture will create the Agricultural Alliance of Armenia,
News-Armenia reports, citing the press service of the Armenian office
of the British organization Oxfam.

According to the press release, the purpose of the Alliance is
the more efficient use of agricultural resources of the country,
improvement of the activity of economic entities, distribution of
professional knowledge in the agricultural sector, improvement of the
advisory system, as well as dissemination of information regarding
cooperation in the sector of agriculture in Armenia between local
and international organizations.

In addition, local and international organizations will sign a
memorandum of understanding on the need to attract bigger financial
resources to stimulate the production of local agricultural products,
as well as emphasize the priority of creating an enabling environment
for agricultural cooperatives.

Baku And Ankara Are Aware Of Iranian Azerbaijanis’ Impact On Karabak

BAKU AND ANKARA ARE AWARE OF IRANIAN AZERBAIJANIS’ IMPACT ON KARABAKH ISSUE – INTERNATIONAL EXPERT

news.am
Dec 5 2011
Armenia

Baku and Ankara are aware of the Iranian Azerbaijanis’ impact on
the Karabakh issue, the Institute for Near East and Gulf Military
Analysis (INEGMA) analyst Theodore Karasik told Armenian News-NEWS.am,
commenting on the most recent demonstrations by the Azerbaijanis
of Iran.

Several days ago, the Iranian Azerbaijanis started a new wave of
protests at the football stadiums of Tabriz city. During a match
between the local team and a squad from Shiraz city, the fans wore
shirts depicting the flags of Turkey and Azerbaijan and also waved
an Azerbaijani flag.

In Karasik’s view, it is difficult to conclude whether the
demonstrations were planned, “because the demands are different among
the fans themselves.”

“Tehran is not a foreign power in the Karabakh process, and it places
its bet very carefully by forming its position in the Caucasus. The
process’ remaining participants, including Russia and Armenia, are
aware of the bets and are playing the possible scenarios,” Theodore
Karasik added.

According to different estimations, there are up to 15-20 million
ethnic Azerbaijanis living in Iran, primarily in the East and West
Azerbaijan provinces.

Armenian businessmen interested in gold mining in Georgia

Armenian businessmen interested in gold mining in Georgia

December 4, 2011 – 16:49 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – Armenian businessmen, interested in gold mining in
Georgia have initiated prospecting works in the country’s Guria
region, Georgian Resource company director Nerses Karamanukyan stated.

In September 2011, the company acquired a USD 306 thous. worth gold
mining license, with USD 1 mln to be invested in the venture.

`We’re engaged in gold mining in Armenia and hope to be successful in
Georgia as well,’ Trend News quoted him Karamanukyan as saying.

Le drame des avortements sélectifs en Arménie

ARMENIE
Le drame des avortements sélectifs en Arménie

Lorsque Nariné gée de 35 ans fit le voyage depuis son village jusqu’à
Erevan, elle se demandait si elle garderait son enfant. Mère de deux
filles, il lui fallait un garçon. `Il me faut porter un garçon pour
transmettre le nom de mon mari. Il devrait avoir un garçon à ses
côtés,` dira-t-elle plus tard.

`Ce n’est pas un secret : l’avortement sélectif est un problème en
Arménie et heureusement, on commence à en parler`.

Ce voyage cependant, s’est terminé sur une décision d’avorter. Elle
était venue d’Erevan pour se soumettre à une échographie, afin de
déterminer le sexe du f`tus. Il s’avéra que c’était une fille, et il
lui a fallu faire ce choix difficile de mettre fin à sa grossesse. Une
décision qui a eu son coût émotionnel : pendant plusieurs semaines,
Nariné aura été en proie à la dépression, au sentiment de culpabilité
et à des accès de larmes.

L’histoire de Nariné n’est nullement unique dans l’ancien état
soviétique ; au temps du communisme, l’avortement était le moyen
national le plus répandu pour le contrôle des naissances. Cette
pratique existe encore. Pendant des générations, les femmes
arméniennes ont eu recours à l’avortement comme une forme de planning
familial, pour maîtriser le nombre d’enfants et dernièrement, le sexe
de leur progéniture.

`Ce n’est pas un phénomène arménien seulement, ce n’est qu’un triste
héritage de l’URSS`, nous dit, dans une entrevue avec Armenian Weekly,
le docteur Kim Hekimian, qui enseigne au département de santé publique
de l’Université Américaine d’Erevan.

Pourquoi des Garçons ?

Il n’est pas inhabituel pour les femmes arméniennes gées d’une
quarantaine d’années, d’avoir subi des avortements multiples. Selon
une étude de 1995 conduite à la clinique d’Erevan où se pratique
l’avortement, le nombre moyen d’avortements qu’ont les femmes après 40
ans est de 8. Certaines en ont eu jusqu’à 25 au moment de leur
ménopause.

D’un point de vue économique, ce n’est pas surprenant. Cette pratique
était à la disposition des femmes gratuitement à l’époque soviétique.
Aujourd’hui, elle a un prix relativement modéré, autour de 25 dollars.
Cela reste une dépense abordable, du moins par comparaison au coût
d’une année de la pilule contraceptive.

L’avortement sélectif a aussi ses motivations socio-économiques.
Traditionnellement, quand une fille grandit et se marie, elle quitte
la résidence parentale. `Le retour d’investissement, en particulier
dans les zones rurales, est faible si vous avez un enfant et si cet
enfant est une fille. Un enfant garçon, pour sa part, devra prendre sa
femme avec lui dans la maison et prendre soin de ses beaux-parents`,
dit Hekimian.

La loi arménienne permet à une femme d’avorter jusqu’à la douzième
semaine – période dont la longueur ne permet pas de déterminer le sexe
de l’enfant. Ce qui revient à dire que si l’un des déterminants de
l’avortement est le sexe du f`tus, ces avortements sont pratiqués
illégalement.

D’après Garik Hayrapetyan, l’assistant du représentant arménien au
Fond des Nations Unies pour la Population (UNFPA) `les données sur les
naissances (en Arménie) montrent que le rapport sexe-à-la-naissance
est anormal : 114 garçons pour 100 filles. Il n’y a pas de doute, le
problème existe en Arménie`.

La nature elle-même affecte la parité des sexes à la naissance, avec
105 garçons pour 100 filles. Le décalage anormal entre les garçons et
les filles est apparu dans les années 1990, parallèlement au
développement de l’examen échographique dans le pays.

`Ce n’est pas un secret que l’avortement sélectif est un problème en
Arménie, et heureusement, on commence à en parler`, nous a dit Marine
Margaryan, travailleuse sociale et coordinatrice de projet du Public
Information and Need for Knowledge (PINK Armenia).` Mais pour la
majorité, il n’y a rien à redire quant à l’avortement décidé sur le
sexe. C’est l’approche stéréotypée et déformée du rôle que doivent
avoir les femmes dans notre société qui pousse à ce déséquilibre`.

Rapports et Mises en Garde

Depuis quelques mois, la question de l’avortement sélectif frappe
durement les esprits en Arménie, tandis qu’un certain nombre de
rapports mentionnent l’Arménie comme faisant partie des pays où cette
pratique atteint des niveaux préoccupants. Selon le Rapport 2011 sur
l’Ecart entre les Sexes, rédigé par le Forum Economique Mondial,
l’Arménie enregistre le plus mauvais résultat, après la Chine,
s’agissant du ratio des sexes à la naissance. La Géorgie et
l’Azerbaïdjan voisins dénotent la même tendance.

En octobre 2011, l’Assemblée Parlementaire du Conseil de l’Europe
(APCE) a voté une résolution condamnant l’avortement sélectif.`Il y a
des preuves solides que la sélection prénatale n’est pas limitée à la
seule Asie. Au cours des années récentes, une différence par rapport
au ratio naturel des sexes à la naissance a été observée dans un
certain nombre de pays membres du Conseil de l’Europe et atteint des
proportions alarmantes en Albanie, en Arménie, et en Azerbaïdjan`,
lit-on dans le texte de la résolution, qui appelle ensuite les trois
pays à analyser et surveiller cette évolution, et fournir ensuite leur
soutien aux initiatives de sensibilisation.

`Ce n’est pas seulement consternant, c’est aussi très embarrassant
pour nous`, a dit- le docteur Gohar Panajyan, conseillère mère et
enfant/santé et procréation/planning familial pour le projet HS-STAR
de l’US Agency for International Development (USAID). `Nous avons été
alertés d’abord par des sources officieuses`, a-elle-dit à Armenian
Weekly, `mais nous manquons de données réellement scientifiques
confirmant tout ce qui est propagé. A présent, la question se pose
avec insistance dans le pays`.

Panajyan pense qu’une stratégie à long-terme doit être adoptée, une
solution qui tienne compte des normes sociétales et familiales de
l’Arménie, et des aspirations.

Les avortements ont baissé en Arménie, selon l’Armenia’s Demographic
and Health Survey (ADHS), Enquête Démographique et Sanitaire en
Arménie. En 2010, le ratio des avortements était de 0,8 avortements
par femme. Ce nombre était de 1,8 en 2005 et de 2,6 en 2000. A
l’inverse, le taux de ratio de fertilité en 2010 était de 1,7
naissances par femme, en dessous du niveau nécessaire pour remplacer
la population actuelle (ce nombre devrait être un peu en dessus de
2,0). Par conséquent, le nombre moyen d’avortement que les femmes
subiront se situera à près de la moitié des enfants auxquels elles
donneront naissance, selon le rapport.

Les diverses méthodes de contraception

Le défi actuel c’est la promotion de solutions alternatives à
l’avortement, par l’amélioration de la disponibilité et de
l’accessibilité des conseils qui dispensent aux couples les
informations récentes de planification familiale. Il se peut que le
dialogue ait été rendu compliqué par les décennies de propagande
soviétique contre les méthodes contraceptives modernes comme la
pilule.

Les préservatifs n’étaient pas produits en quantité suffisante dans
l’Union Soviétique, et leur qualité était médiocre. `Le premier groupe
de discussion que j’ai réuni en 1995 était sur ce thème. Les femmes
disaient que la seule utilité des préservatifs était lorsqu’elles
épluchaient les pommes de terre. [Elles les auraient réservés à leur
emploi] comme gant de latex dans la cuisine,` a dit Hekimian. Bien que
leur qualité ait été sensiblement améliorée, le condom reste
aujourd’hui trop cher pour la plupart des ménages arméniens. Une autre
forme de contraception, le stérilet, était produit et utilisé en Union
Soviétique, et il est toujours recommandé aujourd’hui.

En 2010, vingt sept pourcent environ des femmes mariées avaient
recours à des méthodes modernes de contraception, selon les données de
l’ADHS. Le nombre de femmes qui optent pour des méthodes plus
traditionnelles est légèrement plus élevé, 28 pour cent à peu près,
telles que l’abstinence périodique, le retrait, et les `méthodes
fantaisistes`. Bien que l’emploi de toutes formes de contraception ait
diminué depuis 2000, le recours aux méthodes modernes s’est accru de
20-22 pour cent à 27 pour cent. En particulier, l’emploi du
préservatif s’est accru de 7 pour cent en 2000 et 15 pour cent en
2010.

Sensibilisation

En janvier 2010, l’USAID a lancé en Arménie un projet d’amélioration
de la santé de la maternité et de l’enfance connu sous le nom de
Nova2. Le projet installait un centre de planification familiale dans
24 établissements hospitaliers dans cinq régions du sud de l’Arménie.
Le résultat a été une baisse notable de l’avortement. De même, UNFPA a
participé à la création de 75 centres de planification familiale en
Arménie, donnant gratuitement des conseils et des contraceptifs
modernes au public. Selon Panajyan, le projet HS-STAR de l’USAID en
cours crée des pratiques cliniques dont le ministère de la santé
arménien fera la promotion, et également du conseil, auprès des
professionnels de la santé d’Arménie.

`C’est la première fois que j’entends à tous les niveaux des parties
prenantes s’exprimer un intérêt dans les mesures prises et peut-être
cela donnera-il un plus aux docteurs qui mettent ces conseils en
pratique. C’est ce qui s’est produit au niveau ministériel, ce qui
dénote je pense, la qualité du travail`, a dit Hekimian.

Le fond de cette affaire réside dans le financement et la mise en
application de ces initiatives dans le pays.

Panajyan pense qu’il est trop tôt pour dire ce que réserve le futur,
et si l’Arménie aura un déficit de femmes.

`Concernée par le problème, l’UNFPA Arménie a financé une étude pour
comprendre les raisons qui se trouvent derrière ce phénomène’ a
déclaré Hayrapetyan, ajoutant que les résultats de l’enquête seraient
disponibles en décembre 2011.

Une mère de trois enfants, Panajyan dit qu’elle avait apprécié sa
troisième grossesse. Son plus grand désir, c’était d’avoir un enfant
en bonne santé, quel que soit son sexe. ‘Le problème en lui-même,
l’approche discriminative à la naissance qui fait que chaque enfants
n’a pas les mêmes chances à la naissance et de vivre, devrait être
pris en compte’, a-t-elle dit. `Je ne dis pas que des lois
contraignantes devraient être votées et mises en pratique, mais on
devrait faire quelque chose- au moins au niveau sociétal, pour
sensibiliser le public à ce problème.’

`Il y a eu un cas tragique récent, dans lequel une famille d’une
région reculée – un père, une mère enceinte, et deux filles- se
rendaient en voiture à Erevan pour y faire procéder pour la mère à une
échographie, afin de déterminer le sexe du f`tus. Comme le père l’a
révélé plus tard, ils avaient décidé d’un avortement si c’était une
fille. Mais au cours de leur trajet pour Erevan, la famille eut un
accident et l’une de leurs filles fut tuée`, racontait Hayrapetyan.
Cela a changé complètement leurs vies, et leur approche de
l’avortement sélectif.`

Nanore Barsoumian

Traduction Gilbert Béguian

dimanche 4 décembre 2011,
Stéphane ©armenews.com

Armenia needs systemic changes, says Sardarapat activist

Armenia needs systemic changes, says Sardarapat activist (video)

11:15 – 04.12.11

A change of power in Armenia will not solve all the existing problems
as Armenia needs a systemic change, Alek Yenigomshyan, member of the
Sardarapat movement has said.

`In the recent twenty years Armenia has almost not seen a change of
political generation,’ said he.

`If some young political figures came to the forth, they did so in the
same political arena, that is to say, there has not been a qualitative
change,’ he explained.

`For that reason we consider that the political field has exhausted
itself completely, and we do not see any way of cooperation with this
political field,’ said Yenigomshyan.

Further, he said that civil initiatives are rendering a new life to
the political field by coming together in defense of language,
culture, urban development.

BAKU: US would continue to help Turkey in combatting PKK terrorism

news.az, Azerbaijan
Dec 3 2011

US would continue to help Turkey in combatting PKK terrorism
Sat 03 December 2011 06:59 GMT | 8:59 Local Time

US Vice-President held meetings in Turkey.

Issues such as terror organization PKK, Syria, the future of Iraq,
Iran and many others came up during Turkish President Abdullah Gul’s
meeting with the United States Vice-President Joe Biden in Ankara on
Friday.

A high ranking US official briefed journalists travelling with
Vice-President Biden on Gul-Biden meeting.

The US official told reporters that Friday’s meeting between Gul and
Biden was planned for one hour but lasted two hours.

The meeting was “deep and comprehensive” and the two leaders discussed
terror organization PKK, Syria, Iraq’s future and Iran, said the US
official.

The topic of Iraq was discussed in depth as the US will withdraw its
troops from this country, the US official noted.

Vice-President Biden shared his experiences in Iraq with President
Gul, the US official said.

Vice-President Biden told President Gul that the US would continue to
help Turkey in combatting PKK terrorism, the US official underlined.

Biden told Gul that the Iraqi officials were willing to do more on the
issue of PKK terror, the US official said.

The issue of Iran was discussed “comprehensively” but that the topic
of implementing tougher sanctions on Iran had not come up, the US
official emphasized.

The issue of establishing an international buffer zone at the
Turkish-Syrian border did not come up during Biden’s meeting with
President Gul, the US official added.

Friday’s meeting between US Vice-President Joe Biden and Turkish
Parliament Speaker Cemil Chichek focused on the works for a new
Constitution in Turkey, said sources.

A high ranking US official briefed journalists travelling with
Vice-President Biden on today’s Chichek-Biden meeting.

Vice-President Biden told Speaker Chichek that the new Constitution
would be “an historic opportunity” and will make Turkey a stronger
“model” for the regional countries, the US official said.

Vice-President Biden shared some of his concerns vis-a-vis the Turkish
judicial system and found Cicek’s remarks on possible judicial reforms
“very impressive”, the US official said.

Biden told Chichek that he hoped the Turkish Parliament would take
steps on protocols signed with Armenia in upcoming months, the US
official also said.

Anadolu

BAKU: OSCE Karabakh mediators’ visits have no impact

Lider TV, Azerbaijan
Dec 1 2011

OSCE Karabakh mediators’ visits have no impact

[Presenter] The OSCE Minsk Group co-chairmen have released a statement
about their visit to the region. Noting the incidents on the contact
line, international mediators stressed the importance of observing the
cease-fire agreement. However, the forecast of analysts is not
positive. Intensity observed in the work of the Minsk Group will not
influence the resolution of the conflict.

[Correspondent] It is stated in the statement that the mediators
travelled to Yerevan and Baku on 28-30 November. Jacques Faure, who
will succeed Ambassador [Bernard] Fassier as the French co-chair of
the Minsk Group, also participated in the visit. The co-chairmen met
the presidents, foreign ministers and defence ministers in Yerevan and
Baku. In all their meetings, they reaffirmed their strong commitment
to assisting the sides in achieving a lasting and peaceful settlement
to the Karabakh conflict.

Noting recent reports on incidents on the contact line of the troops,
the international mediators stressed the importance of respecting the
cease-fire. They reiterated that such incidents demonstrate the need
to implement the proposed mechanism to investigate incidents along the
front-lines, on which the presidents have agreed in principle. The
co-chairs also discussed additional measures for enhancing confidence
through people-to-people exchanges and efforts to preserve places of
worship, cultural sites, and cemeteries, the statement of the
co-chairmen says.

However, political analysts believe that the co-chairmen’s visits to
the region have no impact on the settlement of the conflict. The
intensity observed in the work of the OSCE is calculated to delay the
resolution process.

[Cumsud Nuriyev, political analyst] Since the day the OSCE was
created, nearly 40 years now, the OSCE has not resolved any conflicts
so far. All of these three countries [co-chairing the Minsk Group] are
the leading countries in the world. The USA and Russia are the
countries standing in the opposite poles of the world, to say the
least. And since this issue [Nagornyy Karabakh conflict settlement] is
not within their interests, it is being delayed.

Former Deputy Foreign Affairs Minister Libardyan [as heard; presumably
former aide to the first president of Armenia Zhirayr Liparityan] has
said in the USA that Russia has lost this card and now the USA will
win the card. The main goal here is calculated for the upcoming
elections. But at any rate, the OSCE’s mission matches neither the
OSCE regulation, nor the interests of the Azerbaijani government to
restore its territorial integrity. It serves their own interest in the
region more.

[Corespondent] It is stated in the co-chairmen’s statement that on 29
November, the co-chairmen crossed the border between Armenia and
Azerbaijan by foot, and met with local officials to discuss the
situation in the border region. On 30 November, the co-chairmen met
with representatives of Nagornyy Karabakh’s Azerbaijani community, and
underscored that a peaceful settlement must include the right of
internally displaced persons and refugees to return to their former
places of residence.

In addition, two days ago Armenians once again refused to attend a
meeting in Berlin of the local communities [Azerbaijani and Armenian
communities of Karabakh]. This is explained by the invader country’s
fears that its policies of invasion might be exposed on an
international level.

[Cumsud Nuriyev] I do not think there will be another meeting next
time. They are expecting Azerbaijan to send a weak delegation so that
they can do provocative actions. As long as Azerbaijan pursues
successful foreign diplomacy, Armenians will try to avoid such issues
in this way or another.

[Correspondent] Looking ahead to the December OSCE Ministerial Council
meeting in Vilnius, the co-chairmen urged the sides to reaffirm their
commitment to seeking a peaceful settlement and moving beyond the
unacceptable status quo.

Experts are not expecting any results from the council’s Vilnius
meeting to advance the settlement process.

Ataya Alamdarqizi, Ceyhun Mustafayev, Lider TV.

[translated from Azeri]

ISTANBUL: When forefathers become murderers

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
Nov 29 2011

When forefathers become murderers

by ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ

Why is it so hard to face up to the past? There are many reasons, no
doubt. But I believe that one of the most important reasons is the
jolt given to a person’s sense of identity that can be caused by this
facing up to the past.

Today, as Turkey is busy debating exactly what occurred in Dersim
(called Tunceli nowadays) between the years of 1937-1938, the
Republican People’s Party (CHP) is experiencing great turbulence.
Those were the years in which the CHP was in power, and during which
Mustafa Kemal Atatürk was at the helm of both the CHP and all of
Turkey. The photographs and documents emerging today lent clarity to
everything from those years. What took place in Dersim was a large
massacre, and the orders for that massacre were given by the people
running the government in those years, among whom was of course
Atatürk.

The CHP is being shaken to the core because it is unable to place its
forefathers anywhere in this photograph of the past; as a result, its
entire sense of identity is in question. And when Turkey begins to
face up to the events of 1915, we will experience similar sensations,
not as a political party, but as society as a whole.

It is never easy for people to accept that their forefathers might
have committed such serious crimes, and to thus face up to such
realities. The letter below, written by the daughter of a policeman
who was doing his military service in Dersim when he participated in
the massacre there gives us a good sense of the feelings involved
here. If you were to find out your father was part of a massacre, how
would you view him, and how would you interpret your past, your own
identity? Where in your own life would you place the memory of those
massacred people? The man named Seyid Rıza who is mentioned by Sema
Vural, the writer of the letter, in her 2007 publicly shared piece of
documentation was a man who had been hung for supposedly leading the
Dersim uprising. But today we have learned that there was actually no
such uprising, and that this was just a scenario created to justify
the punishment of the people in Dersim.

Towards the end of the letter, one learns where Vural places Seyid
Rıza within the greater scope of her own life, and it is very
surprising, as well as touching. Here, then, is this emotional letter:

A lost photograph¦

I was a child¦ My father was like my right arm, my childhood friend.
The person I trusted most in life was my father, in addition to the
fact that I loved him the most too. Whatever he did was the right
thing; he taught me all the various aspects of life, as well as how to
be strong. He explained his views of life and what was right to me in
his own wonderful story-like style.

I was a child¦ I worshipped my father¦

¦ I wanted to spend all my time with him. It was almost as though I
had wished to be a copy of his past, his present, his future. I was a
child. Everything he said was, for me, an incontrovertible truth. My
father was honest, a patriot, a just man — which is why he was such a
`good policeman,’ you know!

¦ One day, my father and I sat down to create a family album. I was so
happy. He and I were putting together a visual history of our family
together. There were photographs of my grandmother’s neighbors, my
mother’s younger years, relatives, photos from when my father had been
in the military, from when my older brothers and I had been babies,
from my parents’ marriage, and so on and so forth. I was so excited. I
had questions about every photograph, and he answered them all. We
were busy pasting the images onto various pages.

I was so happy and excited as we prepared this visual chronology. He
would talk about the past as I pasted, and I would ask more questions,
and he continued answering them.

This went on and on, until we came to some photographs of some strange
men in the mountains, and I asked him, `Father, who are these people?’
He replied: `These are some photos from when I was a soldier. Look,
here I am in this one.’ And then I asked: `But father, why are you
dressed like these in military photographs? These people don’t even
look like soldiers. And where are these mountains? Who is that man,
father? Who is that old man with the beard?’ It was at that moment
that everything froze, and the joyful atmosphere was broken. He
replied: `Those photographs are from Tunceli, and I was a soldier, and
we were hunting for eÅ?kıya [brigands]. That’s why we were dressed like
that, and that man was the leader of a band of brigands. We were
carrying him off to be executed. To be hung, in other words.’ I said:
`But father, what does `brigand’ mean, and why did they hang that man?
Isn’t it bad to hang someone?’ I wasn’t able to ask any more than
that.

My father looked at me, but it was a look I didn’t recognize, as
though he was looking at me for the first time. What he said next he
uttered as though he were a stranger: `Our nation, our republic, a
threat’ and so on. I tried later to ask about this all, but it was no
use. The pasting of images for that page was over, and he turned the
page. My questions were left hanging in the air, though most of them
were imprinted in my memory. My father turned to me and said, `You’ll
understand when you get older.’ I felt great pain on the inside,
realizing that my father was from now on going to be my father, as
well as some other man for me. I felt pain for that old man in the
photograph, but I didn’t know why. And I couldn’t understand why I
felt such a pain. I wished that I could grow up immediately so I could
ask. When was I supposed to grow up?

Now I am the same age as my father was when we made that album
together. I really did grow up, and when I did, my father became for
me not only my father but another man. But the truth is, I have a debt
which I really don’t want to have hanging on me. At the very least I
would like settle my accounts through an apology, or an expression of
gratitude.

I was just a child, and my father told me about memories from his
military service, though only that much. And when I grew older, he
wouldn’t tell me much more. I understood what he told me when I got
older, but I did not approve. He never tried to tell me again what he
had done, but there was no need for him to anyway¦because I can guess
by now.

When my father died, that photograph was all I wanted, but my oldest
brother tore it up. Why? Because apparently his friends used to ask
him, `Is that man your grandfather?’ But I experienced my childhood
and all those questions I had about that bearded older man. And yes, I
suppose I could say he was my grandfather. And I want my own children
to know this memory. And I want that moment from history that my
father tried to hide to accompany my past childhood. He — and I
struggle for breath as I say this — he is Seyid Rıza!

http://www.todayszaman.com/columnist-264325-when-forefathers-become-murderers.html

President Sahakyan’s meeting in the Argentinean parliament

President Sahakyan’s meeting in the Argentinean parliament

2011-12-01

On 1 December President of the Artsakh Republic Bako Sahakyan visited
the Argentinean parliament and met first deputy speaker of the Chamber
of Deputies Oskar Aguad, chairman of the standing commission on
foreign affairs of the chamber Alfredo Atanasof and a group of
deputies.
A wide range of issues related to internal and foreign policy of
Artsakh, development of bilateral relations and the settlement of the
Azerbaijani-Karabagh conflict were discussed during the meeting.
According to President Sahakyan Argentine is a friendly state for the
Armenian people and Artsakh is interested in developing and deepening
cooperation with it in different spheres. The Head of the State
expressed gratitude to Argentine for recognizing the 1915 Armenian
genocide, adding that it became a serious political and moral victory
for the civilized world.
Touching upon the Azerbaijani-Karabagh relations, Bako Sahakyan noted
that the main reason of impasse in the conflict settlement is the
destructive policy of Azerbaijan qualifying it a variation of
terrorism.
The Argentinean parliamentarians considered important the meeting with
the NKR President, underlining their awareness of the state building
process in Artsakh in particular rating high achievements our republic
has registered in building democratic and civil society.
Both sides noted the necessity of developing bilateral ties and
carrying out concrete projects in this direction.
Primate of the Artsakh Diocese of the Armenian Apostolic Church
Archbishop Pargev Martirosyan, ambassador extraordinary and
plenipotentiary of the Republic of Armenia in Argentine, Uruguay and
Chile Vladimir Karmirshalyan, head of the central information
department of the office of the Artsakh Republic President David
Babayan partook at the meetings.

http://www.president.nkr.am/en/news/meetingsWithDiaspora/1539/

Bako Sahakyan: "Paths towards independence of Artsakh and Uruguay ha

Bako Sahakyan:”Paths towards independence of Artsakh and Uruguay had a
lot of things in common”

noyan tapan
2011-12-02 16:39:36 | | Politics

On 1 December President of the Artsakh Republic Bako Sahakyan
visited the parliament of the Oriental Republic of Uruguay and met
speaker of the House of Representatives Luis Lacalle, chair of its
standing commission on foreign affairs Maria Elena Laurnaga, and a
group of the House of Representatives and Senate members.

Issues related to life in the NKR, its foreign policy, development of
the Artsakh-Uruguay relations and regional trends were discussed
during the meeting.

President Sahakyan thanked Uruguay for continuous assistance shown to
the Armenian people, adding that our people would never forget the
fact that Uruguay was the first state in the world, which officially
recognized the 1915 Armenian genocide.

According to Bako Sahakyan paths towards independence of Artsakh and
Uruguay had a lot of things in common and it draws the two states
closer to each other.

Touching upon the Azerbaijani-Karabagh conflict settlement process the
President underlined that official Stepanakert is a proponent of
peaceful settlement, which does not mean that Artsakh is unable to
defend itself or there could be a possibility of return to the past.

The both sides expressed their interest in developing bilateral
relations. President Sahakyan noted that cementing ties with Uruguay
would have a positive effect on the maintenance of peace and stability
in the region as well as on international recognition of the Artsakh
Republic.

After the meeting the Head of the State accompanied by the Uruguayan
parliamentarians visited the sepulcher of Uruguay national hero Jose
Gervasio Artigas.

Primate of the Artsakh Diocese of the Armenian Apostolic Church
Archbishop Pargev Martirosyan, ambassador extraordinary and
plenipotentiary of the Republic of Armenia in Argentine, Uruguay and
Chile Vladimir Karmirshalyan, head of the central information
department of the office of the Artsakh Republic President David
Babayan partook at the meeting.

On the same day the NKR delegation returned to Buenos Aires. It was
announced to “NT” by the Central information Department of the Office
o fthe Artsakh Republic president.