Author: Badalian Vardan

FINBOROUGH PLAY MARKS CENTENARY OF ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

WhatsOnStage.com
March 26 2015

I Wish To Die Singing is written by Neil McPherson

A new play at the Finborough Theatre next month will mark the centenary
of the Armenian Genocide.

Written by artistic director Neil McPherson, I Wish To Die Singing
– Voices From The Armenian Genocide is billed as “a controversial
documentary drama uncovering the forgotten secrets and atrocities of
a denied genocide.”

Directed by Tommo Fowler, it runs from 21 April to 16 May 2015.

Following several characters through these traumatic events, the play
includes “eye-witness reportage, images, music, poetry from Armenia’s
greatest poets, and verbatim survivors testimonies”.

The cast comprises Kate Binchy, Jilly Bond, Bevan Celestine, Siu-See
Hung, Tamar Karabetyan, Tom Marshall and Simon Yadoo.

I Wish To Die Singing is part of the Finborough’s occasional The
Great War 100 series of plays written about, or during, the conflict.

VANDALISM WILL NOT BE ELIMINATED UNLESS VANDALS ARE CAUGHT AND BROUGHT TO JUSTICE (VIDEO)

12:35 | March 27,2015 | Social

Historic-cultural monuments in Armenia are not protected, say
specialists.

They account the negligence for the authorities’ inactivity and gaps
in the legislation.

Details are available in the video.

ARMENIA USES EUROBOND PROCEEDS TO COVER DEFICIT AND BUY BACK DEBT

Reuters
March 26 2015

YEREVAN, March 26 Thu Mar 26, 2015 7:29pm IST

YEREVAN, March 26 (Reuters) – Armenia has used proceeds of a recent
$500 million Eurobond to buy back part of an older issue and will
use another $85 million to cover its 2015 budget deficit instead of
selling domestic debt, the deputy finance minister said.

Pavel Safaryan told a government meeting on Thursday that Armenia
had received $487.4 million from the March 19 sale of a $500 million
10-year Eurobond.

Some of that money was used to buy back $205 million of its only
previous Eurobond, a $700 million seven-year transaction sold in
September 2013. The new Eurobond paid a yield of 7.5 percent, much
less than the 2020 bond’s 10 percent coupon.

“We will use 40 billion drams ($85 million) from the Eurobond issue
to cover the budget deficit in 2015 instead of an initial decision to
issue local treasury bills,” Safaryan said, adding this would avoid
overloading the domestic debt market.

The 2015 budget sees total government revenues of 1.191 trillion drams,
spending of 1.305 trillion drams and a deficit of 114 billion drams.

The dram has fallen sharply in value over the last year along with
Russia’s rouble, which has been hit by weak oil prices and Western
sanctions over Moscow’s role in the Ukraine crisis. Armenia, a former
Soviet state of 3.2 million people, is closely tied to Russia through
trade and remittances.

The local currency was trading at around 473 to the dollar on Thursday,
compared to just 407 drams a year earlier.

Armenia is rated Ba3 with a negative outlook by Moody’s and B+ with
a stable outlook by Fitch.

Downgrading Armenia in January, Moody’s cited declining remittances,
uncertain foreign investment, exchange rate volatility and pressure
on foreign exchange reserves.

($1= 472.5 drams) (Reporting by Hasmik Lazarian; Writing by Margarita
Antidze; Editing by Jason Bush and Catherine Evans)

DISCOURS COMPLET DE NAJAT VALLAUD-BELKACEM A L’INAUGURATION DU COLLOQUE

Sorbonne le 25 mars 2015

Mesdames et Messieurs les parlementaires,

Monsieur le recteur de Paris, chancelier des universites,

Mesdames et messieurs les ambassadeurs,

Mesdames et messieurs les professeurs,

Mesdames et Messieurs,

Cent ans. Il y a cent ans se preparait l’un des episodes les plus
effroyables de l’histoire de l’Europe et du monde. Le projet politique
du Comite >, visant l’extermination totale du
peuple armenien, allait etre mis a execution declenchant un crime de
masse, inouï par son ampleur et par sa nature.

Un genocide, le premier genocide contemporain, – si l’on excepte le
genocide du peuple herero en 1904, parfois qualifie de > – allait etre perpetre.

Aujourd’hui, cent ans après le genocide, quel plus beau symbole que
cette assemblee de chercheurs, d’historiens specialistes du monde
entier, mis collectivement au service de la comprehension, de la
connaissance et de la reconnaissance de ce qui s’est passe ?

Quelle plus belle reponse a la barbarie, que ces intelligences
rassemblees ici pour, sans relâche, aller plus loin dans la quete de la
verite scientifique et faire progresser la connaissance universelle ?

Quel plus beau symbole enfin, de la volonte de transmettre la memoire
aux generations futures, que ce lieu prestigieux et solennel, le Grand
amphitheâtre de la plus ancienne de nos universites ? Celui-la-meme qui
accueillait, le 9 avril 1916, le meeting en

Aujourd’hui, l’echo de ces voix-la resonne encore a nos oreilles.

Je souhaite remercier le .

Cette reconnaissance est essentielle car c’est aussi la reconnaissance
due aux 500 000 francais d’origine armenienne, descendants de
survivants ; a tous ceux d’entre eux qui, refugies en France, comme
Missak Manouchian, se sont battus pour la France et sont morts pour
elle en heros.

Cette reconnaissance est, de facon universelle, la reconnaissance
due aux individus persecutes, aux minorites opprimees et aux peuples
menaces dans leur existence.

C’est aussi ce qui conduit la France a affirmer que le negationnisme
est intolerable, car le droit est ce qui protège contre toutes les
formes de manipulation. Et c’est la position de la France auprès de
la Cour europeenne des droits de l’homme.

Les diasporas armeniennes vivant dans des pays libres ont
magnifiquement illustre a quel point la connaissance scientifique
est une arme essentielle pour la reconnaissance et contre le
negationnisme. A l’image d’Archag Tchobanian, arrive a Paris en 1895
pour prendre la defense de son peuple precipite dans les massacres
hamidiens, les intellectuels armeniens ont fait du livre et de l’ecrit
un combat pour la verite.

Dans le domaine de la recherche, nous devons beaucoup aux historiens
d’origine armenienne, que ce soient les grands historiens francais
Anahide Ter Minassian, Raymond Kervokian et tant d’autres, ou les
historiens americains comme par exemple Vahakn Dadrian et Richard
Hovannisian.

En Turquie, les Armeniens travaillent main dans la main avec des
intellectuels et historiens turcs, dont certains ont paye de leur
vie ce combat pour la verite : je pense en particulier a Hrant Dink,
assassine le 19 janvier 2007. Je veux aussi saluer la politiste
Bursa Ersanli et l’editeur Ragip Zarakolu, et les remercier d’etre
presents aujourd’hui.

Mais les chercheurs d’identite armenienne n’oeuvrent pas seuls. Et
ce centenaire de l’evenement installe les historiens armeniens au
coeur de l’histoire globale des sciences sociales des genocides ;
il est l’occasion, et ce colloque en est la manifestation, du passage
du genocide armenien a un statut d’objet historique global. En France,
le desenclavement de cet objet d’etudes, dont Yves Ternon, puis Pierre
Vidal-Naquet, ont ete les precurseurs, s’est poursuivi avec l’apport
des specialistes de la Première Guerre mondiale : les historiens
de la Grande Guerre l’incluent desormais pleinement l’etude et la
comprehension des phenomènes extremes de violence guerrière.

L’apport de la turcologie a lui aussi ete determinant, les specialistes
du monde turco-ottoman ayant su aborder l’evenement sans concession.

Enfin, en France, l’etude comparee sur les genocides a permis
d’eclairer l’evenement a la lumière de la recherche sur la Shoah,
mais aussi de la recherche, en plein essor, sur le genocide des Tutsi
au Rwanda.

Aujourd’hui, c’est forts de la somme de ces recherches que nous
pouvons nous souvenir collectivement, et rendre hommage aux victimes.

La recherche, le livre, la creation, sont aussi un apaisement a la
douleur des memoires. Ce sont autant de ponts jetes entre le passe
et l’avenir.

Oui, le travail des historiens est, enfin, ce qui permet a une nation
de regarder plus loin, vers l’avenir, et d’empecher les massacres de
se reproduire.

L’histoire, en tant que science du passe des nations, en nous apprenant
d’où nous venons, nous permet aussi d’eclairer notre avenir.

Parce que, grâce a elle, nous pouvons nous projeter collectivement,
elle nous aide a construire notre citoyennete.

Parce que la citoyennete republicaine est fondee sur le savoir,
la connaissance, le refus de la fatalite, l’ecole a un rôle central
a jouer pour cette transmission. C’est elle qui peut rendre reelle
la promesse de la Republique a ses enfants de les faire grandir dans
l’egalite et la tolerance. C’est elle qui peut semer les germes d’une
memoire partagee.

Je veux ici rendre hommage a tous les professeurs d’histoire-geographie
de France qui y contribuent au quotidien. Le genocide des Armeniens de
l’Empire ottoman, qui fait partie de notre memoire a tous, est etudie
par tous au cours de la scolarite obligatoire, en classe de 3ème.

A l’ecole, nous transmettons l’eveil de la citoyennete, la culture du
debat d’idees, la lutte contre les prejuges et contre toutes les formes
de persecution. Nous apprenons la difference entre la controverse,
le dialogue, qui est a la source meme de la connaissance, et la
manipulation ou la falsification.

A l’ecole, les elèves doivent apprendre a comprendre le monde, mais
aussi apprendre a vouloir le changer, pour prendre pleinement leur
place de citoyen. C’est le sens des reformes que nous adoptons, avec
la mise en place dès la rentree prochaine d’un enseignement moral
et civique tout au long de la scolarite obligatoire. Avec aussi la
reforme du collège, qui permet aux elèves d’etre davantage acteurs
de leurs apprentissages.

Mais cette transmission ne peut se faire seulement a l’ecole, sans
l’appui de la recherche.

Elle doit se poursuivre dans l’enseignement superieur et la recherche,
où les etudes sur les genocides doivent pouvoir encore mieux trouver
leur place, comme les > ont pu trouver la leur
outre-Atlantique notamment.

Par l’ampleur des questions qu’elles recouvrent, elles concernent de
très nombreuses disciplines scientifiques, dans les sciences humaines
et sociales et au-dela. Alors que nous entrons dans le deuxième
siècle de recherches sur le genocide armenien, je souhaite lancer une
mission d’etude dressant un etat des lieux de la recherche sur les
genocides pour permettre a celle-ci de se developper. Confronter les
points de vue, comprendre ce qui a conduit aux evenements tragiques
du passe, c’est ce qui nous permettra de prevenir la possibilite de
leur repetition demain. C’est ce qui nous permettra de continuer le
combat contre l’oubli.

C’est le sens je crois que le President de la Republique a souhaite
donner a ce colloque, qui se tient sous son haut-patronage.

En attendant le 24 avril, où je me rendrai a Erevan aux côtes du
President de la Republique pour une commemoration internationale
exceptionnelle, j’aime a voir dans la tenue de ce grand colloque
international a la Sorbonne une promesse d’inscription durable de
cette histoire dans le present et dans l’avenir : la definition
meme de l’histoire selon Thucydide, qui l’appelait

ASSAD: WEST FOLLOWS SAME SCENARIO IN SYRIA, UKRAINE TO WEAKEN RUSSIA

(c) AFP 2015/ HO/SANA
POLITICS
18:00 26.03.2015(updated 18:09 26.03.2015) Get short URL
736151
Western countries, interfering in Syria’s internal affairs, are
following the same scenario as in Ukraine to weaken Russia, Syrian
President Bashar Assad said Thursday.

DAMASCUS (Sputnik) — Assad said his goal as Syria’s president is to
resist foreign interference in the country.

“There is a connection between the Syrian crisis and what is happening
in Ukraine. Firstly, because both countries are important for Russia.

Secondly, because there is a goal in both cases to weaken Russia and
create puppet states,” Assad told Russian reporters.

(c) SPUTNIK/ ANDREY STENIN Toppling Syrian Gov’t May Cause Catastrophic
Consequences – Turkish Envoy “It is clear that the duty of any state
is to protect the interests of the people and the country. And,
of course, the role of the government is to implement these interests.”

The Syrian authorities will not oppose the revival and expansion of
a Russian naval facility in the port of Tartus if Moscow decides to
do it, President Bashar Assad said on Thursday.

“We welcome the expansion of Russian presence in eastern Mediterranean,
especially near our shores and in our ports,” Assad said in an
interview with Russian journalists.

The naval facility in Tartus, established in Soviet times, has been
used for the maintenance and resupply of Russian warships in the
Mediterranean.

With the escalation of the Syrian crisis, Russia withdrew all military
personnel from the Tartus base and replaced them with civilian
workers. However, after the deployment of a large naval task force
in the Mediterranean in 2013, Moscow has been considering the revival
of the facility.

He added that a decision on the expansion of the Tartus facility must
be taken by the Russian authorities.

Read more:

ENHANCED COMPETITION ATMOSPHERE REQUIRES POLITICAL DECISION – MP

15:06 * 26.03.15

Efforts to enhance the competition atmosphere in Armenia require a
political decision, says a lawmaker from the opposition Prosperous
Armenia party.

“What we see on our market is a quota-based approach, which is either
voiced or isn’t,” Mikael Melkumyan told reporters, noting that the
import of specific products is very often assigned in advance to
concrete entrepreneurs or companies.

The opposition MP said he sees that the same principle applies also
to the procurement system. “It is necessary to understand that we will
manage to introduce clarity and manage to ensure tenders,” he noted.

“Unless we change the content of the decision-making, we won’t have
a success,” Melkumyan added.

LOOKING EAST: ARMENIAN LEADER ON LANDMARK VISIT TO CHINA

ANALYSIS | 27.03.15 | 10:41

By NAIRA HAYRUMYAN
ArmeniaNow correspondent

Many experts describe the current state visit of Armenian President
Serzh Sargsyan to China as “historical” and a “breakthrough” in the
relations between the two countries.

While there is no definitive information on specific arrangements,
it is already known that China has agreed to support Armenia in the
current difficult period.

Armenia is a member of pro-Russian economic and military alliances
that at this moment appear unable or unwilling to support its economy
and security.

Moreover, membership in these units as well as the existing
Armenian-Russian bilateral agreements also appear to prevent
Yerevan’s from pursuing integration with the West, in particular,
in the security sphere.

China has become an alternative direction for Armenia as the
Russia-West standoff has aggravated. Despite the fact that China in
many cases supports the position of Moscow, Beijing is also engaged
in quite active dialogue with Washington and many call China a
“third pole”.

According to official information, China has agreed to provide a
preferential interstate credit to Armenia, and it is possible that
this allocation will be in Chinese yuans. However, nothing has yet
been reported on the possible volume of the credit, but private
reactions of Armenian officials are evidence that Armenia will get
significant investments.

Yerevan, in fact, has officially declared about its joining the Chinese
Silk Road Project. It is within this project that China will allocate
money for the construction of a North-South highway that will connect
Georgia and Iran through Armenia.

The matter also concerns the intention to invest in the construction
of an Iran-Armenia railway, as well as in the construction of a new
nuclear power plant in Armenia.

This are the largest Armenian projects that Russia had promised it
would take part in, but in fact torpedoed them. Despite the fact
that there had also been offers from France and the United States
to invest in the construction of a new nuclear reactor in Armenia,
Yerevan, under apparent Russian pressure, had to refuse to cooperate
with the West in the nuclear sphere. But it is unlikely that Russia
will obstruct Armenian-Chinese agreements in this field – relations
with Beijing are extremely dear to Moscow at present.

The joint Armenian-Chinese declaration signed by President Sargsyan
and his Chinese counterpart Xi Jiping earlier this week contains a
line that says “… to continue cooperation in the military sphere,”
including military assistance. China has already provided some types
of weapons to Armenia before, and this, military experts say, has
helped restore Armenia’s military balance with Azerbaijan, which is
actively buying weapons from Russia.

It is not clear yet whether there will be new arms supplies from China,
but the legal framework for that, as well as for China’s participation
in many infrastructure projects in Armenia has already been created.

Experts point out another major agreement – on cooperation in the
tourism sector. The consent of the Chinese leadership to include
Armenia in the list of current tours for Chinese travelers is a major
incentive for the development of tourism in Armenia.

VILLAGERS ADDRESS A LETTER TO ARMENIAN PRIME MINISTER OVER A TAILING DUMP OF AKHTALA MINING PLANT

by Karina Manukyan

Friday, March 27, 16:11

195 residents of Mets Ayrum rural community have addressed a letter
to Armenian Prime Minister Hovik Abrahamyan over the situation around
the tailing dump of the Akhtala Mining Plant. The letter has also
been sent to all parliamentary groups of Armenia, the OSCE Office
in Yerevan, Armenian Ministry of Nature Protection and the Standing
Parliamentary Commission for Agriculture and Environment.

The letter expresses concerns about the Government’s decision to
change the category of farming lands into industrial lands in the
light of construction of a new tailing dump of the Akhtala Mining
Plant on an area of 40 hectares. The letter stresses that despite
the discontent of the Mets Ayrum residents, on March 26, 2015, the
administration of Mets Ayrum made a positive decision on that issue.

Meanwhile, the exploitation conditions of the tailing dumps in Akhtala
and Mets Ayrum fail to meet the main environmental and safety standards
and endanger the health of the local population.

In addition, the rural residents have repeatedly complained of their
deteriorating health due to the impact of the Nahatak tailing dump.

The authors of the letter specify that the community people receive no
compensation for the damage inflicted to their health and environment.

In this light, the residents of Mets Ayrum come out against
construction of the new tailing dump and urge the Akhtala Mining Plant
to solve the problems related to re-cultivation and safety norms at
the old tailing dumps. In addition, the residents demand declaring
the Feb 26, 2015 decision null and void.

On March 24 and 25, a group of independent experts from Yerevan
monitored the situation in the areas adjacent to the Akhtala Mining
Plant. At a press conference on March 27, expert Seyran Minasyan said
that the group revealed tails in Alaverdi, Akhtala and Mets Ayrum. The
current management of the Akhtala Mining Plant takes no measures to
clean the specified areas from the tails.

The operating Nahatak tailing dump of the Mining Plant is also
criticized. The surveys conducted since 2013 have revealed that the
lead content in the 60-70% of peaches in Mets Ayrum is 2-4-fold higher
than the maximum admissible limit.

To note, in summer 2014 the former director general of the Zangezur
Copper Molybdenum Combine Maxim Hakobyan became the new owner of the
Akhtala Mining Plant. The plant had previously belonged to the Metal
Prince Ltd.

INTERNET PRESS-CONFERENCE WITH ANALYST GORDON HAHN (USA)

[ Part 2.2: “Attached Text” ]

[picture-4854-1427379388.jpg?itok=zi8qVEax]
Gordon HahnÐ~Pnalyst
СШÐ~P
On March 26 Internet press-conference for Armenian media with American
analyst, professor in several universities Gordon Hahn was held on
following topics: European and Eurasian integration processes and
security issues for the countries of our region; The current policy
of Russia in promotion of integration processes; Islamic extremism
in the post-Soviet countries and territories of Russia.

These “first-hand” comments Armenian journalists will publish in
their media outlets.

The internet press-conference with Gordon Hahn was organized within the
project “Topical Dialogues on the New Integration Agenda of Armenia”
of the “Region” Research Center supported by U.S. Embassy Public
Affairs Section.

David Stepanyan,

– Recently, the relations between the Europe, the USA and Iran
are gradually expanding the geopolitical functions mandated to this
regional superpower in the Greater Near East. Is it possible to foresee
a more significant role played by Iran in South Caucasus, considering
that such aspirations have multiply been voiced by Iranians, at least,
in expert circles?

Answer – It is true that Iran, including its Revolutionary Guards,
is being allowed to play a leading role in the battle against ISIL
in Iraq and that this could give Teheran a foothold in Mesopotamia
in might seek to expand and retain, increasing its power in the
region. Moreover, the nascent deal on Iran’s nuclear program could
relieve the burden of sanctions and allow Iran to develop both a civil
and military nuclear program while being able to export oil. In this
way, Iran’s economic and political power will be enhanced. This said,
I do not think Iran is focused all that much on Azerbaijan, having
more important fish to fry in the Middle east, Iraq, and Israel.

– The list of Azerbaijani public officials deprived of the right to
enter Western countries was the reaction of the West to the closer
relations between Moscow and Baku, by the way not only within the
multibillion arms sale deals, but also energy projects, including those
Rosneft is involved in. In its turn, the US has expressed readiness to
develop its relations with Armenia not only in the economy, but also
the defense. And this is regardless of the presence of Russian Military
Base 102 in Gyumri. Can we have new tendencies in the geopolitics of
the West and Russia in South Caucasus against this background?

Answer – It is possible that if the new ‘cold war’ continues to
escalate that Russian-Western competition in the Southern Caucasus
will intensify. This is already happening with NATO’s plan to expand
its ‘Atlantic Resolve’ military exercises to Georgia and the nearby
Black Sea region. In addition, the pipeline wars are likely only
to intensify as problems between Ukraine and Russia persist and the
EU seeks to end its dependence on Russian energy supplies. Russia’s
Turkey Stream project also signals that the South Caucasus is likely
to become a more coveted energy transit route. Russia’s successful
courting of Armenia to join the EEU is another sign of the region’s
growing geopolitization. The US is therefore likely to pay greater
attention to Baku as a counter to the Russian-Armenian axis.

– Has the Ukrainian crisis strengthened or weakened the positions
of this or that superpower in South Caucasus? In particular, do you
think the Ukrainian crisis has somehow readjusted the positions held
by the USA, Russia, and the EU in the region?

Answer – Much will depend on the outcome of the crisis. The destruction
and economic dislocation created by a crisis could serve as a lesson to
Azerbaijan and Armenia not to rely on the West because of the negative
reaction sure to come from Moscow. Moscow’s greater interests in
the region and greater willingness to protect those interests is
insurmountable as long as Europe refuses to expand to the region
and the US remains too distant from the region and preoccupied with
other issues to devote the resources necessary to challenge Russian
dominance there.

– The establishment of an actual customs point on the border between
Russia and Belarus has once again revealed the setbacks of the EEU
and the gap between the real politics and the integration projects
implemented by Moscow. Can we state today that the Eurasian integration
is still as topical as before and does this serve as a foundation
for the Russian aspiration for a bipolar world?

Answer – The customs posts are the consequence of Lukashenko’s policy
of embracing Moscow but maintaining a wandering eye on the other girls
in the neighborhood to keep his options open. Because of geography,
Belarus, like the other European former Soviet republics, is in some
ways more torn between Europe and Russian than are the other former
Soviet republics, and it tries to play both sides of the fence as
a result. I would not regard the EEU as an Eurasian integration
project to be a failure, unrealistic, or neo-imperial. Russia seeks
to consolidate a sphere of influence, security and markets near
its borders. This is normal for a great power, and it is likely to
succeed to some extent over time, as long as it is patient, develops
its own economy so it is an attractive partner, and limits the military
component of its foreign policy in the region.

Anahit Danielyan,

Against the background of European and Eurasian integration processes
and the security issues deriving from those, how probable do you
think the following are:

1. The peaceful resolution of the Karabakh conflict and in what way?

2. The international recognition of Nagorno Karabakh?

Answer – Unless Yerevan and Baku can come to terms on their own,
then with Russia’s close ties to Armenia long-standing and now
further consolidated under the EEU, there are only two options:
(1) continued conflict driven by the parties themselves and/or
by competition between Russia and the West with the latter taking
Azerbaijan’s side to counter the Russian-Armenian alliance or (2)
a resolution of the conflict sponsored and guaranteed by Russia.

Artak Barseghyan, Public Radio of Armenia,

– Mr. Hahn, do you think that the escalation of tension between Russia
and the West may lead to a confrontation and a new global war?

Answer – This is increasingly possible but remains more unlikely than
likely at the present moment. The military escalation in the form of
intensifying and expanding maneuvers between NATO and Russia marks
a new phase in the conflict. The West remains unwilling to recognize
Russia’s sphere of influence, so Moscow has decided to enforce it –
to make it a reality. If the West and NATO are as intent on denying
Russia this sphere of influence as Moscow is intent on securing it,
then war is a distinct possibility. If the Ukrainian war heats up
again, then Washington is likely to begin sending lethal military
equipment, which will prompt a harsh reaction from Moscow – likely to
be Russian troops’ full intervention in the Donbass and an offensive
to push Ukrainian forces beyond the borders of Luhansk and Donetsk
Oblasts and perhaps a drive to secure a land bridge to Crimea.

– What prospects for the Karabkh conflict resolution do you see in
the conditions of a continuous escalation, provoked by the Azerbaijani
party?

Answer –

– How interested is the US in the normalization of the Armenian
and Turkish relations, and is Washington ready to put the necessary
pressure on Ankara to make it recognize the Armenian Genocide and open
of the Armenian and Turkish border that has been closed since 1993.

Answer – The US has a full plate and is not very interested.

Washington’s policy of emphasizing human rights and democracy to
one extent or another is an obstacle to close relations with Baku,
but that could change under a Republican administration after Obama.

The ,,Hetq,, newspaper,

– How do you think the EU (Association membership) and EEU integration
of the countries in the so-called post-Soviet space will be reflected
on their security priorities and the security of Russia?

Answer – Unfortunately, the failure of the EU and Russia to negotiate
over Ukraine’s relationship with the EU and EEU – despite the divided
preferences inside Ukraine that remain to this day according to a
recent opinion survey – has led to a security crisis reflected in
Moscow’s withdrawal from the CFE treaty and recent trial balloons
regarding a European army. Washington will be pressuring NATO
member countries to comply with the 2% of GDP minimum for defense
expenditures, likely making a European army an overly expensive
luxury. The EU is forced to follow NATO which will be stepping up
its pressure on Russia, leaving Europe between two flames. Moscow
is likely to push gradually for the further militarization of SCO, a
more robust CSTO military potential, and semi-militarization of BRICS.

– In which regions (South Caucasus, Near East?) and in what issues of
international politics do the interests of the EU, USA, and Russia
coincide today, and how much are the parties able to build their
relations in a differentiate manner? Is the ISIL among the issues
that may unite the efforts of the conflicting parties – Russia and
the Western countries, including the USA?

Answer – I have repeatedly recommended that cooperation become the
cornerstone for trust-building in Russian-West relations in times of
tension. After all, despite the horrors of Stalin, we were able to
cooperate with the USSR against Nazi Germany. ISIL and AQ are no less
a potential problem, and Putin’s Russia is far better than Stalin’s
USSR. Unfortunately, the ubiquity and instantaneity of communications
keeps tensions higher than they should be. So has Ukraine. ISIL and
AQ are threats to the US, EU and Russia, so there is no reason not
to work together, and this threat is actually a good reason not be
fighting over Ukraine.

– Do you think the sanctions war between Russia and the USA
strategically justified? What can be a factor contributing to winding
down this war?

Answer – The West needs to impress upon Kiev that no economic
assistance will be forthcoming should the war be renewed and impress
upon Moscow that should it or its Donbass allies be the party that
renews the war, sanctions will increase multifold and NATO will beef
up its forces even further in eastern Europe. The West should offer
to agree to and help secure Ukraine’s non-bloc status, if Moscow
helps secure fulfillment of the Minsk II agreements.

Tatevik Ghazaryan,

– Mr. Hahn, from your point of view, do the United States of America
consider Russia a threat to its national interests and security taking
into account the crisis in Ukraine and the deteriorating relations
between the two former polars of the “cold war”?

Answer – Unfortunately, yes the US does now see Russia as a
threat. However, it fails to understand that it created this threat
by seeking to expand NATO to Russia’s borders, including Georgia and
especially Ukraine.

– How would you assess the perspectives of a new integration
organization – Eurasian Economic Union of Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan
as well as Armenia, since January 2015?

Answer – I believe there is real geographic (proximity), political
(similar systems and political cultures), and economic logic for the
formation of a regional economic association in the former USSR. This
is the practice in every other region of the world.

Each country has reasons to join, but Russia’;s is ot any desire to
recreate the USSR or be a new ‘Third Rome.’

– Do you think that the international society, that is the OSCE Minsk
Group co-chairing countries and the United States in particular,
make their best efforts and really have a political will to reach the
peaceful resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict (taking into
consideration the recent announcement by U.S Assistant Secretary
of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland on the
need of an “humanitarian gesture” by the Armenian side concerning
the Azerbaijani diversants who killed a 16-year-old boy in
Nagorno-Karabakh)?

Answer –

Araks Martirosyan, The ,,168 hours,, newspaper,

– We are currently at the most dangerous point since the signature
of the ceasefire that ended the worst fighting between Armenian
and Azerbaijani forces twenty years ago. We can understand that
disagreements between Azerbaijan and Armenia continue, because sides
cannot reduce tensions. How can the West reduce Russia’s influence
on Armenia and Azerbaijan which, for many international experts, is
worrying? Many experts insist that Russia inflames tensions between
the conflicting sides to punish the West for the conflict in Ukraine,
and for the sanctions.

Answer – I do not believe Russia has an interest in inflaming the
conflict. The conflict is largely local and built on interethnic
distrust between Baku and Yerevan and the legacy of Soviet
state-building.

– Armenia has chosen to be a part of Eurasian economic union because
Armenia is dependent from Russia in security sphere. Can the West
give security guarantees to Armenia if needed?

Answer – This is unlikely. The US has enough problems on its plate,
and Yerevan appears to have made its choice in favor of Moscow as
a protector.

ng-Interviews

FULL SPEECH NAJAT VALLAUD-BELKACEM AT THE INAUGURATION OF THE CONFERENCE

[ Part 2.2: “Attached Text” ]

Sorbonne March 25, 2015

[arton109586-480×320.jpg]

Ladies and gentlemen,

Mr. Rector of Paris, Chancellor of the Universities,

Distinguished Ambassadors

Distinguished professors,

Ladies and gentlemen,

Hundred years. There was about a hundred years one of the most
appalling episodes in the history of Europe and the world. The
political project of the Committee “Union and Progress” to the total
extermination of the Armenian people, would be implemented triggering
a mass crime, unprecedented in its scope and in nature.

Genocide, the first modern genocide – except for the genocide of
the Herero people in 1904, sometimes called “colonial genocide” –
was about to be committed.

JPEG – 4.7 MB

Today, one hundred years after the genocide, what better symbol that
the meeting of researchers, historians of the world put together in the
service of understanding, knowledge and recognition of what happened ?

What better answer to the barbarism that these intelligences gathered
here to relentlessly go further in the pursuit of scientific truth
and advance universal knowledge?

What better symbol finally, the desire to transmit to future
generations the memory, this prestigious and solemn place, the Grand
Amphitheatre of the oldest universities? That one even which welcomed
on 9 April 1916, the meeting in “Homage to Armenia” in the presence
of Paul Deschanel, President of the Chamber of Deputies, the writer
Anatole France and the Minister of Instruction public at the time,
Paul Painleve?

Paul Painleve then stood with others to denounce loudly the crime being
committed. I quote: “The nightmare has become a present reality. The
massacres that last year Armenia bloodshed beyond their scope and
the most atrocious cruelty legends of all ages and all countries. >>

Today, the echo of those voices still ringing in our ears.

I wish to thank the “International Scientific Council for the study of
the Armenian Genocide” and all its partners, including the mission in
2015 of the Coordination Council of Armenian Organizations of France
and the Regional Council of Ile-de-France, to organizing the biggest
event for the 1915 centenary This conference, under the patronage of
the President of the Republic, combines high places for French research
and knowledge transfer: the Sorbonne, but also the Memorial Shoah,
the School of Higher Studies in Social Sciences and the National
Library of France .

JPEG – 5 MB

It attests to the investment in research on the genocide of a large
community of scientists worldwide. It will, for the first time,
allow to question the balance of one hundred years of research on the
Armenian genocide, but also to examine, in a comparative dimension,
the specificity of the twentieth century in the history of humanity,
as the era of genocide and mass violence.

The role of history is crucial because the historian has the primary
role of establishing the truth of the facts to shed light on what
has been.

Subject to a commitment to systematic extermination, Armenians were
first victims of persecution. They were referred to as Armenians
because they were Armenians.

Because they represented the soul and the Armenian culture, artists,
intellectuals, men and women, were pursued and arrested.

They paid a heavy price.

On 24 April, the musician Komitas was arrested, as well as 650 other
intellectuals. The life of the greatest genius of Armenian music,
which was rescued from oblivion the most beautiful Armenian folk songs,
was broken at that time by the trials of deportation and torture. He
fell definitively into madness.

The poet Daniel Varoulan, one of the greatest poets of Armenian
literature, was also arrested on April 24 before being brutally
murdered 23 August 1915.

Novelist and poet Zabel Yesayan, was, too, targeted by the raid. She
miraculously escaped from it. She later worked tirelessly to collect
the testimonies of genocide survivors, until overtaken by another
barbarism, that of Stalin’s Gulag, where she disappeared in 1943.

The exterminator will continued relentlessly: the entire Armenian
people was intended.

The men were killed and their women and children were massacred or
deported in appalling conditions. They died on the way, exhaustion,
or locked up in camps. Killing in Syria, Mesopotamia, the cradle of
European civilization, occurred when other atrocities are committed
today.

Research has estimated that, from 1915 to 1917, two-thirds of the
Armenians, at least 1.3 million people lost their lives because of
the deportations, concentration camps and mass executions.

Research has helped to support and analyze these facts, and name the
genocide name. The rigorous study of sources, testimonies of survivors,
documents, has established this truth, that no longer debate in the
scientific community.

There is no more appropriate term in our language as coined by the
jurist Raphael Lemkin in 1943 to name the unnameable, to qualify the
will of systematic destruction of a people for what it is.

JPEG – 1.9 Mb

But if the work of historians is to know, it is also essential because
it sustains recognition.

The French Republic has taken note of the progress of historical
research and has registered in the single article of the law of 29
January 2001 “France publicly recognizes the Armenian genocide of
1915” .

This is essential because it is the recognition due to the 500 000
French of Armenian origin, descendants of survivors; to all of them,
refugees in France, as Missak Manouchian, fought for France and died
for her hero.

This recognition is, universally, due recognition to individuals
persecuted, oppressed minorities and peoples threatened their
existence.

This is also what led France to assert that denial is intolerable
because the law is what protects against all forms of manipulation. And
this is the position of France to the European Court of Human Rights.

The Armenian diaspora living in free countries have beautifully
illustrated how scientific knowledge is an essential weapon for
recognition and against Holocaust denial. Just like Archag Tchobanian,
arrived in Paris in 1895 in defense of his people rushed into the
Hamidian massacres, the Armenian intellectuals have the book and
writing a fight for the truth.

In the area of research, we owe much to Armenian historians, whether
the great French historians Anahide Ter Minassian, Raymond Kervokian
and many others, or American historians such as Vahakn Dadrian and
Richard Hovannisian.

In Turkey, the Armenians are working hand in hand with Turkish
intellectuals and historians, some of whom have paid with their lives
this fight for truth: I think in particular of Hrant Dink, murdered on
19 January 2007. I also want to acknowledge the political scientist
Bursa Ersanli and publisher Ragip Zarakolu, and thank them for being
here today.

JPEG – 5.8 MB

But researchers of Armenian identity n’Å“uvrent not alone. And
Event centenary installs Armenian historians in the heart of the
global history of social sciences genocide; it occasionally, and this
conference is the event of the passage of the Armenian Genocide to
the status of global history object. In France, the opening up of
the object of study, Ternon Yves and Pierre Vidal-Naquet, were the
precursors, continued with the contribution of the First World War
specialists: historians of the Great War ‘now fully include the study
and understanding of the extremes of war violence.

The contribution of turcologie was also crucial, experts of the
Turkish-Ottoman world who knew uncompromising approach the event.

Finally, in France, the comparative study of genocide has informed the
event in light of research on the Holocaust, but also for research,
booming, the Tutsi genocide in Rwanda.

Today is strengthened by the sum of these searches we can collectively
remember and honor the victims. Research, the book of creation, are
also a calming pain of the memories. These are all bridges between
the past and the future.

Yes, the work of historians is finally allowing a nation to look
further into the future, and to prevent the killing of reproducing.

JPEG – 153.4 kb

The story, as the science of the past of nations, by teaching us
where we came from, also allows us to inform our future. Because,
thanks to her, we can project ourselves collectively, it helps us
build our citizenship.

Because republican citizenship is based on knowledge, understanding,
denial of fate, the school has a central role to play in this
transmission. It is she who can make real the promise of the Republic
his children to grow them in equality and tolerance. It is she who
can sow the seeds of a shared memory.

I want to pay tribute to all the history and geography teachers from
France who contribute everyday. The genocide of the Armenians in the
Ottoman Empire, which is part of our memory to all, is studied by
all during the compulsory school in 3rd grade.

At school, we transmit the awakening of citizenship, culture debate
of ideas, the struggle against prejudice and against all forms of
persecution. We learn the difference between the controversy, dialogue,
which is the source of knowledge, and manipulation or falsification.

At school, students must learn to understand the world, but also learn
to want to change it, to fully take their place as citizens. This
is the meaning of the reforms we adopt, with the introduction
next September moral and civic education throughout compulsory
education. Also with the reform of the college, which allows students
to be more involved in their learning.

JPEG – 1.3 Mb

But this transmission can not be done only at school, without the
support of research.

It must continue in higher education and research, where studies on
genocide should be able to better find their way, as “genocide studies”
could find their overseas particular.

The magnitude of the issues they cover, they concern numerous
scientific disciplines in the humanities and social sciences and
beyond. As we enter the second century of research on the Armenian
genocide, I would launch a mission study drawing up an inventory of
research on genocide to allow it to grow. Confronting perspectives,
understand what led to the tragic events of the past, this is what
will allow us to prevent the possibility of their repetition in the
future. This is what will allow us to continue the fight against
oblivion.

This is the sense I think the President of the Republic wished to
give this symposium, held under the high patronage.

Meanwhile on April 24, where I will go to Yerevan with President of
the Republic for outstanding international commemoration, I like to see
in the holding of this major international conference at the Sorbonne
sustainable Registration promise this story in the present and in
the future: the very definition of history according to Thucydides,
who called him “a treasure for eternity. >>

Thank you.

JPEG – 5 MB Friday, March 27, 2015, Claire (C) armenews.com

____________________________________________________________________________

Photos of Claire Barbuti