From Yerevan To Baku Through Moscow

FROM YEREVAN TO BAKU THROUGH MOSCOW

Panorama.am
28/03/2012

Armenian delegation will travel from Yerevan to Baku through Moscow,
instead of Tbilisi, as it was earlier reported, to attend the plenary
session of Euronest Parliamentary Assembly. Member of Armenian
delegation Naira Zohrabyan told Panorama.am a couple of days ago that
such variant was being discussed; however, Artak Zakaryan confirmed
the news today.

Answering to a question if the provided security guarantees are
sufficient to travel to a rival country, the MP has said that certain
obstacles will surely be recorded; maybe they will appear in the
airport. However, Armenian delegation is determined to travel there.

Baku will host the second plenary session of Euronest Parliamentary
Assembly on April 2-4. The Armenian delegation will travel in its
full staff.

Armenian Farmers To Get AMD 7,5 Bln Concessional Loans In 2012

ARMENIAN FARMERS TO GET AMD 7,5 BLN CONCESSIONAL LOANS IN 2012

PanARMENIAN.Net
March 29, 2012 – 17:47 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – On March 29, during a meeting in Armenia’s Kotayk
province government amended the decision on specification of funding
mechanisms in the framework of the program “”Economy Stabilization
Lending.”

In this context, Prime Minister of Armenia Tigran Sargsyan noted that
the government granted concessional loans to farmers at the amount
of AMD 14 bln. last year.

“This year we will allocate extra AMD 7,5 bln.,” he said.

Farmers of Kotayk province also benefited from the concessional loans,
with the 90 % of the applications granted.

In 2011, the maximum amount of concessional loans for farmers totaled
AMD 3 mln, with 14 % interest rate, 6-month grace period and up to
2 years maturity.

Turkey Pursues Risky Policy In Middle East – Expert

TURKEY PURSUES RISKY POLICY IN MIDDLE EAST – EXPERT

PanARMENIAN.Net
March 29, 2012 – 17:07 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – Turkish policy in the Middle East is too active,
according to director of RA NAS Institute of Oriental Studies.

“Turkish foreign policy trends in the Middle East are similar to those
of the U.S. in key areas, though the interests of the two countries
collide in certain cases. Turkey will harm itself, if it continues
implementation of such risky policy,” Ruben Safrastyan said.

The expert didn’t rule out military intervention by the Turkish army
in Syrian developments, which necessitates ensuring security guarantees
for the Armenian community of the Arab country by Turkey.

D. Babayan: Mediators Undertake Measures Not To Complicate Situation

D. Babayan: Mediators undertake measures not to complicate situation

Panorama.am
29/03/2012

“During our meetings with Ambassador Kasprzyk issues related to
the violation of terms of the ceasefire regime are always being
highlighted. Official Stepanakert has repeatedly expressed commitment
to launch mechanisms investigating the incidents that occur on the
contact line,” Davit Babayan, head of Artsakh President’s public
relations department, told Panorama.am remarking on Ambassador Andrzej
Kasprzyk’s visit to Artsakh.

The NK official stressed that Azerbaijan isn’t committed to the
recommendations of mediating states, but contributes to more tensions
on the contact line.

“The international community must develop certain mechanisms to make
Azerbaijan be constructive. The mediators undertake measures to not
complicate the situation, however Azerbaijan strains the situation.”

Israeli Scholar Accuses Erdogan Of Chutzpah And Hypocrisy

ISRAELI SCHOLAR ACCUSES ERDOGAN OF CHUTZPAH AND HYPOCRISY

PanARMENIAN.Net
March 29, 2012 – 17:26 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – A fortnight ago, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Turkey’s
Prime Minister, accused Israel of committing “genocide” against
the Palestinians. Speaking before members of his AK Party, the
Islamist party that has ruled Turkey since 2002, Erdogan said that
the “children of the Holocaust” – the Israelis – had for a century
been “systematically” carrying out a campaign of genocide against
the Palestinian people, Benny Morris says in “Turkish Hypocrisy”
article published by the Daily Beat.

“It is not a “genocide” by any stretch of the imagination or language.

Arabs have been killing Jews and Jews have been killing Arabs for
decades – and while it is true that Jews, given their superior skills,
have killed Arabs in greater numbers than Arabs have killed Jews,
it is not for want of Arab trying,” he says.

“Erdogan’s description of Israeli behavior toward the Palestinians as
“genocidal” is mendacious and inflammatory. And it is mind-boggling
in its chutzpah and hypocrisy, given the fact that Erdogan heads a
state that has actually perpetrated several bouts of genocide in the
not-too-distant past, against the Armenians and, to a degree, against
the Asia Minor Greeks between 1894 and 1923,” Mr. Morris emphasizes.

“Turks may dispute the authenticity of this or that document found in
foreign archives (their own archives have been thoroughly purged of
any trace of the successive stages of the Armenian genocide) – such
as the handwritten notes by Ahmet Esat, the director of the Second
Branch of the Security Office of the Turkish Ministry of Interior,
relating to a meeting of the heads of the Committee of Union and
Progress, the group that ruled Istanbul, in January 1915 that set in
train the massacres (“Apply measures to exterminate all males under 50,
priests and teachers, leave girls and children to be Islamized… Kill
off in an appropriate manner all Armenians in the army…”),” he says.

“But there is no disputing the testimony of the many thousands of
Armenian and Greek survivors of the murderous “deportations” or of
the American missionaries, and the reports by German and British and
American consuls and businessmen (and the occasional Turkish “traitor”)
who recorded what happened in real time during the horrific massacres,
which resulted in between 1.5 to 2 million dead Armenians and Greeks.”

“Turkish officialdom may publicly dispute this historical reality
and, in an effort at browbeating, may threaten and even cut off
relations or contacts with this or that country – as it recently
did with France when the French parliament introduced legislation
to prohibit Armenian Genocide denial. But the Turks know. And their
acute sensitivity regarding the genocide charge is probably a good
indication of their knowledge about what their forefathers did a few
decades ago. Charging others with genocide may simply be a defense
and denial mechanism,” Mr. Morris says.

“In Erdogan’s case, traditional Islamic antipathy towards “the Jews”
– “a base” people and “murderers of prophets,” as the Koran puts it
in one of its suras – may also play a role. Up-front honesty may be
shooting for the stars. But surely we are entitled to a measure of
humility and contrition from the Erdogans of this world – or at least
their silence,” he concludes.

Benny Morris teaches history at Ben-Gurion University, Beersheba,
Israel. He is the author of “Righteous Victims, A History of the
Arab-Zionist Conflict, 1881-2001.”

The French Constitutional Council’s Decision Was Political

THE FRENCH CONSTITUTIONAL COUNCIL’S DECISION WAS POLITICAL
Karen Ghazaryan

“Radiolur”
29.03.2012 17:44

The Hay Dat (Armenian Cause) Office of France worked towards the
adoption of the bill criminalizing the denial of the Armenian Genocide,
taking into consideration the numerous steps Turkey has taken against
Armenia.

The bill was passed by the Senate and the National Assembly despite the
efforts of the Turkish lobby. President Nicolas Sarkozy was to sign it
within 15 days. Before the bill would be signed into law, Turks managed
to collect enough signatures to apply to the Constitutional Council

“We were sure the law would be cancelled if submitted to the
Constitutional Council,” Head of the Hay Dat Office of France Hrach
Varzhapetyan told a press conference in Yerevan.

On February 29 the bill was ruled unconstitutional. According to
Murad Papazian, representative of the Hay Dat Office of France,
the Constitutional Council took a political decision.

The bill will be redrafted after the National Assembly returns to work
after recess. According to Hrach Varzhapetyan, the Armenian community
is united on the issue. Although there are some other side issues,
but the national interest is above everything, he said.

ATP Announces Expansion Of Leadership Team

ATP ANNOUNCES EXPANSION OF LEADERSHIP TEAM

Armenian Weekly
March 29, 2012

WATERTOWN, Mass.-The Executive Committee of the Armenia Tree Project
(ATP) recently announced the addition of Julia Mirak Kew to its
advisory board and the hiring of Tom Garabedian as managing director.

Julia Mirak Kew has joined ATP’s Executive Committee, and Tom
Garabedian has been named the organization’s new managing director.

“As the scope and complexity of ATP’s work has increased over the
past several years, the Executive Committee has recognized the need to
broaden its management team. These changes are intended to develop and
strengthen a management group that is capable of handling the growth
and challenges that ATP will face in the future,” noted Executive
Committee member Anthony Barsamian.

Mirak Kew joins ATP’s founder and chairperson Carolyn Mugar, Nancy
Kricorian, and Anthony Barsamian on the organization’s Executive
Committee. She played an instrumental role in the Mirak family’s
decision to make a leadership pledge to ATP in 2005, when her family
made a major commitment to underwrite the establishment and operation
of a large-scale reforestation nursery in the Lori region of northern
Armenia.

“My father Bob, sister Jennifer, and I were looking for an organization
that was working in Armenia on a larger scale, and we identified
ATP as a good match for the John Mirak Foundation established by
my grandfather,” Kew explained. “We especially liked the fact that
ATP’s programs have a direct impact on the neediest people in Armenia,
especially children who are the beneficiaries of their tree planting
and environmental education programs.”

ATP established the Mirak Family Reforestation Nursery in Margahovit
Village in 2005, and the annual operation of this program has been
funded by the Mirak family. The nursery was inaugurated in honor of
John and Artemis Mirak during a visit by Dr. Robert Mirak and his
sister Muriel Mirak-Weissbach in 2008.

“Our family recognized that ATP’s work is restoring the environment
but it’s more than just planting trees. ATP is changing people’s
lives through its job creation and poverty reduction programs, and we
know this is something my grandparents would value since they always
taught us to give back,” recalled Kew, whose grandparents were genocide
survivors from Arapkir.

Mirak Kew is vice president of Mirak Properties, a family business
that focuses on real estate management and development in the Greater
Boston area. She has a bachelor’s degree in economics from Wellesley
College and an MBA from Babson College. She is a member of the Armenian
International Women’s Association.

The John Mirak Foundation supports a number of charitable and
education institutions in the town of Arlington and in the Armenian
community including the Armenian Cultural Foundation, St. Stephen’s
Armenian Elementary School, St. James Armenian Apostolic Church, and
the Armenian Heritage Park. Mirak Kew has two daughters, Christina
and Alexandra.

Tom Garabedian’s new role as managing director will include program
oversight, staff development, and finance. The addition of Garabedian
will enable ATP Director Jeff Masarjian to focus on development
and special projects. “Jeff has been critical to ATP’s development
over the past 11 years, and we are counting on him to extend ATP’s
mission in the area of environmental advocacy, working with our major
funders, and planning special projects such as recognition of ATP’s
20th anniversary in 2014,” said Barsamian.

Garabedian worked as a consulting actuary with Hewitt Associates,
retiring in January 2011. He has a degree in mathematics from Bowdoin
College, is a member of the Hopkinton Zoning Board of Appeals, and is
chair of Hopkinton Commissioners of Trust Funds. Garabedian is one
of the founding family members of the Armenian Church of the Holy
Translators in Framingham, and is a trustee of the Armenian Church
Endowment Fund. He is married to the former Dora Verne Kishibay,
and they have three sons, Deran, Berj, and Gregory.

ATP’s mission is to assist the Armenian people in using trees
to improve their standard of living and protect the environment,
guided by the need to promote self-sufficiency, aid those with the
fewest resources first, and conserve the indigenous ecosystem. ATP’s
three major programs are tree planting, environmental education,
and sustainable development initiatives.

For more information about ATP, visit

www.armeniatree.org.

Defender’s Assessment Of The RA State Commission For The Protection

DEFENDER’S ASSESSMENT OF THE RA STATE COMMISSION FOR THE PROTECTION OF ECONOMIC COMPETITION ACTIVITIES IN 2011

Story from Lragir.am News:

Published: 10:58:53 – 29/03/2012

The revealed problems and registered achievements during 2011 in
the area of responsibility of the Commission are presented below,
though they are not exhaustive.

The RA Law “About the Protection of Economic Competition” was adopted
in 2000, and the Commission in Armenia was established in 13 January
2001. In 2011 the RA Law “About the Protection of Economic Competition”
was reconsidered and as a result it was complied with international
standards to a high degree. The new version of the Law gave wider
opportunities to the Commission for working more effective.

Despite all this, the level of assurance of economic competition
in RA is still not sufficient. According to indicators of the World
Economic Forum, though Armenia has registered a certain progress by
the coefficient of efficiency of anti-monopoly policy, it continued
occupying low positions in the internal competition and efficiency
of anti-monopoly policy level. Only in 2011, 12 commodity markets out
of 13, analyzed by the Commission, were rated as highly concentrated.

There were also cases of hindrance for entering the market of new
economic entities by dominant entities in those markets.

Though, the number of decisions of the Commission to subject economic
entities to responsibility during 2011 raised twice compared to the
previous year, which resulted in the increase of about 6 times of the
the sums paid to the RA State Budget have, however, in appropriate
cases the measures taken by the Commission did not reflect the real
picture of violations of the competitive legislation existing in
different commodity markets and did not make sufficient influence on
the situation of the protection of economic competition in the country.

Measures taken by the Commission for termination and prevention
of cases of anti-competitive operations were not sufficient. The
Commission with its decisions subjected several economic entities to
responsibility for anti-competitive operations. The economic entities
appealed against the Commission decisions not carrying out their
requirements. During the entire trial period, which can last for 2
years, the Commission did not take any measures to ensure the process
of implementation of its decisions. For instance, the Commission
has a power to subject an economic entity to responsibility for not
implementing the Commission’s decision, but the Commission waited
until the trial was completed.

Measures taken by the Commission for termination and prevention of
cases of unfair competition were not sufficient as well. A case was
registered of production and realization of vodka by “Alex Grig”
company which had almost similar name creating confusion. In this
regard the Commission started proceedings in 2009, and the company
appealed to court to protest the Commission’s decision. The Commission
applied a penalty to the company for unfair competition, as well
as required from the company to eliminate the violation, that is to
remove the production from circulation in 1-month period. According
to RA Law “About Protection of Economic Competition” a possibility
of administrative responsibility is prescribed for not implementing
the Commission decisions, as well as ban on its operation suspention
in case of appealing against the Commission’s decision. However,
during 2 years the Commission did not take sufficient measures for
applying adequate means of administrative responsibility towards
economic entity, which did not implement its decisions.

Though according to the last changes in the RA Law “About Protection
of Economic Entities” the Commission’s powers in the process of
obtaining evidences regarding anti-competitive operations were
extended, however, the instruments were not sufficient for the
Commission to effectively carry out the control over protection of
economic competition. In particular, the Commission does not have
such powers in the area of inspectations, which allow them to obtain
evidences on hidden violations of the RA Law “About Protection of
Economic Entities”, such as anti-competitive agreement, participants
of which- economic entities- take all measures to keep their agreement
in secret. Competition protection authorities almost in all countries
have a wide range of powers of inspection, which gives opportunities
to reveal even the most confidential agreements. That is the reason,
that all international experts, who are studying the RA legislation
on competitiveness, suggested to endure inspection powers to the
Commission.

The Commission did not take sufficient measures to raise the public
awareness on issues of economic competition, which in its turn
reduced effectiveness of assurance and protection of consumers’
rights. Though the Commission’s official website was operating, it
contained insufficient information on the issues of the area. At
the same time the website even didn’t include statistics of the
Commission’s activities. The Commission’s activities’ publicity and
transparency in respect of issues of selling low quality and expired
products, groundless raising of prices of products, and other issues
of public importance which appeared as a result of unfair activities of
economic entities in competition sphere were not sufficiently ensured.

Karen Andreasyan,

Human Rights Defender of the Republic of Armenia

The list of the identified positive developments, gaps and shortcomings
is not exhaustive.

The introduced Chapter (23) of the HRD Annual Report 2011 is available
in full at

The HRD Annual Report 2011 was developed based on the complaints
received by the Staff of the Human Rights Defender, legislation
analysis, trustworthy and non-disclaimed publications in press,
reports of the international and local organizations as well as
information received during the interviews with field specialists
and human rights defenders.

http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/country25622.html
http://pashtpan.am/pages/downloadPdf/file_id/574.

Azerbaijan Fails To Lead The OSCE Mission To Its Front-Lines

AZERBAIJAN FAILS TO LEAD THE OSCE MISSION TO ITS FRONT-LINES

ARMENPRESS
MARCH 29, 2012
YEREVAN

YEREVAN, MARCH 29, ARMENPRESS. The OSCE Mission held scheduled
monitoring of the Nagorno Karabakh and Azerbaijani armed forces”
contact-line in the Martouni direction, near the village of Kuropatkino
on March 29.

NKR”s MFA press service said from the positions of the NKR Defense
Army, the monitoring was led by Personal Representative of the OSCE
Chairman-in-Office Andrzey Kasprzyk (Poland). The monitoring group
included the OSCE Office Coordinator Peter Kee (Great Britain) and
Field Assistant of the PRCiO Antal Herdich (Hungary).

>From the Azerbaijani side, the monitoring was led by Field Assistants
of the Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairman-in-Office William
Prior (Great Britain) and Hristo Hristov (Bulgaria).

The monitoring passed in accordance with the agreed schedule. No
violation of the cease-fire regime was fixed. However, the Azerbaijani
side did not lead the OSCE mission to its front-lines, as a result
of which it was conducted from a farther distance.

The monitoring mission was accompanied by representatives of the NKR
Ministries of Foreign Affairs and Defense from the Karabakhi party.

Iran And The Azeri Problem

IRAN AND THE AZERI PROBLEM

March 28, 2012:

Earlier this month Azerbaijan police arrested 22 suspected Iranian
agents and accused them of planning terror attacks on American
and Israeli targets. Azerbaijan has been chasing down and arresting
Iran-backed terrorists and spies for years. This time they discovered
that some of the people they arrested had been recruited by Iran, as
spies, as far back as 1999. Now Iran is increasingly using terrorism
to influence what goes on in Azerbaijan.

Iran has long been keeping a close eye on Azerbaijan. This is because
most of the Turkic and Moslem Azeris live in Iran. Up until 1813,
modern Azerbaijan was part of Iran. Armenia and Azerbaijan were the
last conquests of Russia as it advanced down the Caucasus region
(between the Black and Caspian Seas) in the 18th and 19th centuries.

The Russians stopped when they ran into the Turkish and Iranian
empires.

In effect, most of “Azerbaijan” is in Iran and Iran has long hoped to
reunite all Azeris under their rule. Currently, about a quarter of the
Iranian population is Azeri, and many have risen to senior positions
in the government. Despite that, most Azeris would like all Azeris
united in a single Azerbaijan. This is not a popular idea within Iran.

The Russians, on the other hand, have come to accept the loss of
Azerbaijan and Armenia.

Iranians, both individually and collectively, have been increasingly
aggressive towards Azerbaijan over the last decade. For example,
last month hackers calling themselves the Iranian Cyber Army, and
similar names, defaced media web sites in Azerbaijan. This was in
response to Azerbaijan arresting locals and Iranians for trying to
organize terror attacks on Israeli targets. Iran is also unhappy
with the growing diplomatic and economic ties Azerbaijan has with
Israel. Azerbaijan has ordered nearly two billion dollars of Israeli
weapons and military equipment. This was very unpopular with Iran,
which believes that Israel must be destroyed and that any Islamic
state that supports Israel deserves much the same.

Two years ago, all this Iranian hostility, and disputes with
neighboring Armenia, led oil rich Azerbaijan to increase its defense
budget 87 percent, to $3.1 billion. Nearly half the budget was spent
to modernize the armed forces. A lot of the cash was quietly spent
on improved counter-terrorism capabilities. Israel was providing
advisors and special equipment to detect and deal with growing Iranian
sponsored Islamic terrorism in Azerbaijan. This Israeli connection,
and especially the growing success of the Azeris in countering Iranian
terror efforts, has infuriated the Iranians.

Located on the Caspian Sea, in the Caucasus, Azerbaijan was part of
the Soviet Union until 1991, and much of its military equipment is of
Cold War vintage. Azerbaijan is 95 percent Moslem (85 percent Shia),
and has some serious territorial disputes with its Christian neighbor,
Armenia. The two countries have been at each other’s throats for
nearly two decades because of a land dispute. Although Azerbaijan
has three times more people and much more money (because of oil),
the Armenians are better soldiers, and the dispute has been stalemated.

Azerbaijan has a population of nine million and a GPD of $72 billion
compared to 3.2 million Armenians who have a GDP of $10 billion.

Azerbaijan is determined to reverse this string of defeats, no matter
the cost.

Last year Armenia signed a pact with Russia that, in effect, makes
it a protectorate of Russia. The deal extends the lease on a Russian
military base in Armenia from 2020 to 2044. The 3,000 man Russian
force in Armenia may be increased and Russia, in effect, guarantees
Armenia’s security. Armenia needs all the help it can get, as it is a
landlocked Christian nation surrounded by three hostile Moslem states
(Turkey, Azerbaijan and Iran). To the north, there is Georgia which,
while Christian, has its own problems with Russia. This deal makes
any major move against Armenia by Azerbaijan very risky. While the
Russians want to remain friendly with Azerbaijan, they have definitely
taken sides here.

In return for this security, Armenia will have to follow Russia’s
lead in diplomacy, and any other area the Russians feel is important.

Meanwhile, the Russians will provide new weapons and equipment for
the 43,000 troops in the Armenian military, and help arm an even
larger reserve force.

The only active enemy Armenia has at the moment is Azerbaijan. Both
countries continue to disagree over possession of Nagorno-Karabakh,
a 4,400 square kilometer district, full of Armenians, surrounded by
Azerbaijani territory. Technically, there has been a truce between
Armenia and Azerbaijan since 1994. But it has been a hot truce.

Between 1991 and 1994 there was a war between the two countries over
Nagorno-Karabakh, which Armenia won. Some 20,000 people died, and over
a million (400,000 Armenians and 700,000 Azerbaijanis) fled their homes
as Armenia occupied 31,000 square kilometers of Azerbaijani territory,
to connect Nagorno-Karabakh to Armenia. Most of the refugees were
from areas dominated by one group, who drove out the minority. Some
40,000 Azerbaijani civilians were driven from Nagorno-Karabakh. The
situation was humiliating for Azerbaijan, who saw it as yet another
example of more powerful and wealthier (via oil fields) Moslems being
defeated by a smaller number of armed and more capable non-Moslems.

The Armenians have survived, although surrounded by Moslems, for
centuries. But the Armenian economy is a disaster, particularly since
Turkey and Azerbaijan have closed their borders with Armenia. Since
the early 1990s, the best educated Armenians have been emigrating.

They join a six million strong community of expatriate Armenians. This
group can raise millions of dollars on short notice, and have provided
the emergency funds when needed for the fighting against Azerbaijan.

Some twelve percent of the 150,000 Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh are
armed and organized to defend the mountainous area, and are backed
up by even more troops in Armenia.

But Azerbaijan is making a serious effort to create an effective
military, and revive their economy. Azeri defeats at the hands
of better trained, led and organized Armenian troops were caused,
in part, by Azerbaijani corruption and double dealing among themselves.

Moreover, the Armenians have a military tradition going back
centuries. The Azeris are working hard to redress the military balance,
thus the Armenian need for a Russian alliance, and the sharp jump in
Azeri military spending. But while Armenia only has to worry about
one enemy, Azerbaijan has both Armenia and Iran to deal with.

http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htterr/articles/20120328.aspx