The Reason For The Emigration From Sos Clarified By The Rural Commun

THE REASON FOR THE EMIGRATION FROM SOS CLARIFIED BY THE RURAL COMMUNITY HEAD

Friday, 10 May 2013 22:06

Sos is one of the largest villages of Martouni region yet the youths
have begun to leave the village in the recent years. There were
even cases when whole families left the village. Sos inhabitants
speak regretfully of the emigration as mainly young people leave
the village. What is the reason and why do young people prefer to
live outside? We tried to get answers to these and a number of other
questions from rural community head of Sos Hunan Grigoryan.

– Mr. Grigoryan, what makes the villagers leave Sos?

– People want to live well. I do not mean that it is impossible to live
here, they just try to be well provided for. Part of the inhabitants
emigrate, another part go to work outside for 3-4 months.

Part of them go to the province of Rostov where Sos villagers have
been living since the years of the Soviet Union, after the Artsakh
war their number increased. Today there is a village with about 90
families there, the greater part of them are from Sos. We call it
Sos in Rostov. Those who go there do not return any more, they get
jobs, marry, register and settle there permanently. Another part of
our villagers leave for Moscow to work, there a co-villager of ours
pays a high salary at an amount of USD 1500 per month to those from
Sos. Some people have to pay credits, some are to repair their houses,
this is a good chance for our villagers to earn money.

– The inhabitants of which age group mainly leave?

– Young people do. Being unable to find any job 1 or 2 years after
demobilization they have to leave.

– Mr. Grigoryan what can you say about the emigration of whole
families. Is this still going on?

– Yes, there were such cases as well. But now no family leaves the
village any more. Besides there are cases when they return again. For
example, two families have come back this year.

– How many people left the village during the past 3 years?

– Nearly 15 young people and 4 families left the village. I hope some
day they will all return to Sos.

Interviewer Hakob Avanesyan

http://karabakh-open.info/en/subjecten/4391-en992

The Non-Governmental Organizations In The Defense Army

THE NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS IN THE DEFENSE ARMY

Tuesday, 14 May 2013 15:10

Recently the “To Hayq” foundation organized the visit of 30 Diaspora
Armenian students having arrived in Artsakh from the USA, France and
the Russian Federation to one of the military units in the south of the
country. The initiative was supported by the NKR armed forces command
and aimed to consolidate the army-society relationship. Our compatriots
from different corners of the Diaspora were at the Armenian-Azerbaijani
contact line and got familiarized with the peculiarities of the
military duty, the press service of the NKR Defense Ministry reported.

Similar visits dedicated to the May Day victories were organized in
other frontier line parts as well and the representatives of different
non-governmental organizations of the Republic were involved in it.

http://karabakh-open.info/en/societyen/4459-en997

"Hraparak": The Question Of The Inclusion Of Armenia In The Russian

“HRAPARAK”: THE QUESTION OF THE INCLUSION OF ARMENIA IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION DISCUSSED

16/05/2013 13:10:00
Oratert News

The political scenes of Russia discussed the issue of inclusion of
Armenia in the Russian Federation. According to the source of Russian
diplomatic circles, not wanting to publish its name, Moscow believes
that the time has come for greater actions in the post-Soviet space.

According to some reports, the prior consent of the President of
Armenia Serzh Sargsyan on the occasion of the matter has already been
obtained. In Armenia, reunification with Russia will be explained as
a way out of the socio-economic crisis. In addition, such a prospect
would be linked to the growing need for destruction of every year the
external threat posed by Azerbaijan, the newspaper “Hraparak” writes.

Iran Would Be Happy To Supply More Natural Gas To Armenia – Union Of

IRAN WOULD BE HAPPY TO SUPPLY MORE NATURAL GAS TO ARMENIA – UNION OF EMPLOYERS

May 17, 2013 | 14:17

YEREVAN. – Armenia can receive a larger volume of natural gas from
Iran, but this is a political matter.

Chairman Gagik Makaryan of the Republican Union of Employers of
Armenia said the abovementioned during a press conference on Friday.

In his view, Iran would be happy to increase the amount of gas supply
to Armenia because Iran has difficulties due to the economic sanctions
that are imposed upon the country. Thus, the Iranian gas could become
for Armenia an alternative to the gas which Gazprom Company supplies.

As per Makaryan, the current reviewing of the price of the Russian
natural gas is partially because of the ArmRusGazprom Company’s
excessive costliness, high salaries, 30-35 percent profitability,
and, in general, by its “super elite” nature.

Reflecting on the Armenian government’s pledge to subsidize the
imminent increase in the price of the Russian natural gas being
supplied to Armenia, Gagik Makaryan asked a rhetorical question:
“At whose expense will the subsidy be implemented?” In line with his
calculations, if the gas price increases, $40-50 million additional
taxes will be collected for the budget, but the government directs a
small fraction of this amount to providing assistance to social groups.

Photo by Arsen Sargsyan/NEWS.am

News from Armenia – NEWS.am

The Price Of Gas And Legitimacy

THE PRICE OF GAS AND LEGITIMACY

There is no need to look for anything sophisticated in the foreign
policy of Russia. It is very simple not only for Armenia and the
Caucasus but also Europe. Unlike the Western states, Russia does not
built its policy with other countries on sophisticated information,
technological devices and multilevel games. The Russian factor is
very simple. It has unlimited resources, and by changing the price
for resources it can dictate its policy across the Eurasian continent.

This is the Russian conduct in regard to Armenia and Europe with direct
and unhidden messages. So, there is no need to look for anything else,
especially get disappointed with the Russians. This is the price,
at least the short-term price that we pay for hesitating to join the
Eurasian Economic Union and deviating from the Russian pole.

First, Russia is pursuing its own interests, it is another issue how
we posture against these interests. It is necessary to stop the savior
v executor discourses on Russia and understand that what is going on
is politics. Armenia has been able to lay out areas of cooperation
with other poles of influence but unfortunately it has failed to
establish such relations that would possibly reduce trouble.

The price of gas is also in this context. The problem has some
nuances. First, is it worthwhile complaining of our authorities if they
have nothing to do about the price because it was not them to raise the
price of gas. It is worthwhile to protest against the government but
not for the gas price. The government is one of the actors of building
such odious relations with Russia. They wanted to be participants
of this game, consuming and generating a mythical discourse about
the elder brother. At the same time, the policy of the government
resulted in yielding resources and companies handling them to Russia.

Now it is difficult to evoke all the mistakes of the past and start
resolving all the old problems. There is neither resource, nor time.

However, one thing is clear. Diversification of foreign policy,
at least partial, is an important result, even if the conditions
are not good enough. At the same time, it is necessary to understand
that diversification means frequent clashes of different interests of
different parties. And in order not to depend heavily on these clashes
and not to suffer much, it is necessary to assess the consequences. It
may sound like populism but we need to have and develop an economy
where the public will not be concerned much about rising gas price,
having in addition to this several arguments that it is worthwhile
paying additionally for a diversified foreign policy and minimum
losses for the state.

The backlash to the gas price is a revolt against the Armenian
government, the system, not against Russia. The revolt is expressed
against the gas price but the deeper reason is other. Obviously,
not only the economic policy but also politics in general has failed
in Armenia.

There has been the same situation for several years, only conventions
have changed. New values are sought to establish our own policies
and governance. It used to be nationalism by the government. Then
this discourse was not effective, and Serzh Sargsyan declared
modernization but he was unable to handle it, even at the level
of public expectations. Now the government lacks any concept of
implementation of the state, and has led to a point where the issue
of the state does not interest the citizens. It is not accidental
that one of the reactions to the rise of gas price was emigration.

Without sudden changes Armenia will integrate with the world. In
technological terms, this is the Western world, while technologies
are the fastest and most available means of development, at least as
a consumer. At the same time, it is clear that the European market
will attract the Armenian business more. Interests will become more
diverse, the Russian factor will lose its importance. Russian pressure
will follow.

There is one more nuance – the Armenian-Russian strategic relations in
the form of relations between armed forces. This is the last reserve.

Armenia is not doing anything for diversification. Whatever is done
is done with the precaution of military bases. However, the prospect
of diverse interests will impose two important things – a more open
and transparent economic system which will build up public confidence
in the government.

The natural consequence of this change must be the potential to build
free external relations. In both cases Russia will try to pursue its
own interests and do it on odious resources accumulated in Armenia,
using every opportunity to destabilize the situation and put pressure
on the government. In any case, the issue is the legitimacy of the
authorities which is central, if not methodic, in terms of Armenian
politics. An illegitimate government cannot implement its interests
autonomously, especially requesting something from the public. In this
meaning, the raise of gas price will boost the price of legitimacy
for the authorities and the system in general.

Levon Margaryan 12:41 17/05/2013 Story from Lragir.am News:

http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/29906

Un Rappel Permanent A Nos Devoirs Et A Notre Identite

UN RAPPEL PERMANENT A NOS DEVOIRS ET A NOTRE IDENTITE

Avec Ara Toranian nous nous connaissons depuis plus de 35 ans. C’etait
une epoque où les Armeniens, toujours fiers de leurs origines, avaient
entame un combat difficile. A ma place, j’ai soutenu cette lutte,
parfois explosive, difficile, dangereuse. Je ne regrette rien. Au
contraire, si les circonstances sont a nouveau reunies , je remettrai a
nouveau le couvert, a ma place, celle du journaliste. Camus au moment
de la guerre d’Algerie avait eu cette phra-se,presse qu’il etait de
choisir par ses amis partisans de l’independance : ” je choisirai
toujours ma mère “. C’est a la mienne que je pense quand on me parle
des combats armeniens. Elle a eleve ses trois fils dans le souvenir
quotidien de l’exode qui avait conduit sa famille, fuyant les massacres
des Turcs, jusqu’a la ville d’Alep en Syrie.

C’est pourquoi les 20 ans de Nouvelles d’Armenie me reconfortent et
sont pour nous un rappel permanent de nos devoirs et de notre identite.

Longue vie aux Nouvelles d’Armenie.

vendredi 17 mai 2013, Spidermian ©armenews.com Ara ©armenews.com

Book Review: "Bone Ash Sky"- Harrowing stories from a broken world

Weekend Australian
May 18, 2013 Saturday
5 – All-round Review Edition

Harrowing stories from a broken world

Review by Peter Pierce

Bone Ash Sky
By Katerina Cosgrove
Hardie Grant, 465pp, $29.95

KATERINA Cosgrove’s first novel, The Glass Heart, was published as
long ago as 2000. It has been worth the wait for the second (although
the author may have a different opinion). The austerely titled Bone
Ash Sky is an often grisly panorama of
20th-century history that begins with the displacement of Armenians
from their home country by the Turks during World War I.
The Pakradounian family, on whom Cosgrove concentrates, is uprooted
from “that mythical place called Van” whose lake — “with its
colours of bone and ash and sky” — is the focus of nostalgia across
the generations.

Some of those who survive what became known (still contentiously in
Turkey) as the Armenian genocide or the first holocaust, in which a
million people might have perished, find their difficult and
circuitous way to Beirut. It is to that city, where she was born 29
years before, that Anoush Pakradounian travels from Boston, in time
for the war crimes tribunal in which her father, Selim, has been
posthumously indicted.

Spanning 80 years, weaving convoluted family history into a succession
of historical calamities, the story is nonetheless always under
Cosgrove’s tight narrative control. We move backwards and forwards
between the death marches of 1915 from Armenia into Syria, the
Lebanese civil war and Israeli occupation of 1982, and the novel’s
present time of 1995, in which a peace prevails, however temporary
that may prove.

Cosgrove’s account of the genocide is one of the most harrowing
extended passages in recent Australian writing: “the gendarmes lay
the tiny corpses out on the sand”; “This is where three thousand of
us were burnt alive only months ago”; “In the coming days the
remaining Armenian prisoners were shod like horses with the nails
driven into their soles”.

For those who escape — such as the brother and sister Minas and Lilit
Pakradounian — there is one grim, resonant obligation: “Observe.
Remember. Record.”

Such horrors recurred, on a smaller scale, in the Lebanese civil war.
Selim was second in charge of a Phalangist or Christian militia that
specialised in the “assassinations of key Muslims” and (his
particular crime) in murdering Palestinian refugees: “They had been
instructed to kill every living thing in the Sabra-Shatila camp.”

Anoush’s quest is to find out how her father, who abandoned her at
birth, at the same time as her mother died, was himself killed in
1983. This is not the much trodden fictional path of seeking solace in
the uncovering of one’s roots. Rather, Anoush’s venture will confuse,
dismay and engulf her. Cosgrove’s heroine is passionate, overwrought
and as unforgiving of her failings as of those she proclaims in
others.

She lets herself be led into deeper and more unexpected complications:
with families in Beirut with whom her father was mortally connected,
and with a patriotic Israeli who yet dedicates himself to removing
landmines in Palestine.

Several sections of the novel open with literal as well as
metaphorical detonations: deaths by sniper fire and car bombing or —
in the case of Anoush’s grandfather, Minas — “by his own rage”.

Anoush is confronted by contested versions of bitter events as she
confides, not without histrionics, that “I come closer to the core of
my history, the blackness”.

What to make of a father who evidently believed his killings were
justifiable because he was the son of a genocide survivor? Or of the
tales with which she grew up in childhood: “My grandmother became the
slave of a Turk. My grandfather was incarcerated in a death camp.”
These intractable elements of her past — and Anoush’s own integrity
— mean she neither seeks nor expects absolution for herself for what
has happened before. Rather — in one of Cosgrove’s most daring
touches — she takes on future burdens that most likely will prove
disastrous: taking custody of the daughter of the jihadist bomber of
the American embassy in Beirut who had ordered her father’s death to
coincide with his own.

Anoush allows herself few consolations. Her birthplace is described
acerbically. Beirut has “the beauty of an Orient past so idealised
and yet so corrupted in these halfway countries, neither East nor
West, delicately amoral, carelessly precise, in an advanced state of
decay”.

Bone Ash Sky is a novel of an ambition that is no longer uncommon in
Australian fiction, but it is still remarkable. The interlacing of
disparate characters’ lives might have been implausible. In Cosgrove’s
hands it seems fated. This is a novel that for long stretches is
gruelling to read, not only in its recounting of atrocities, but in
the matter-of-factness with which the child, Inam, tells Anoush that
she knows how her father killed Anoush’s father and then himself:
“They’re both in Hell.”

For Cosgrove, a Sydney writer with Greek roots who spent a long and
fruitful time researching this novel, Bone Ash Sky may seem like the
recommencement of her career. It is, in any event, a notable feat of
imagination and execution on a scale that never daunted her.
______________________________
>> Peter Pierce edited the Cambridge History of Australian Literature.
Katerina Cosgrove will be a guest of the Sydney Writers Festival, May 20-26.

BAKU: Head of Lachin Region Executive Authority: `I pity the Syrian

APA, Azerbaijan
May 18 2013

Head of Lachin Region Executive Authority: `I pity the Syrian
Armenians resettled in our occupied territories’
[ 18 May 2013 14:18 ]

Baku. Shamil Alibeyli – APA. `If we are dictated some terms behind the
six major principles on the settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh
conflict, then these principles should not be considered,’ said head
of Lachin Region Executive Authority Akif Salimov while commenting on
Edward Nalbandian’s statement that they are ready to sign the six
principles on the resolution of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict
developed in L’Aquila, Italy.

According to him, these issues should be approached plainly: `We are
ready to give rights to our Armenian citizens in Nagorno Karabakh. If
Armenians agree to this, it will favor them, but if not, we will take
necessary measures in Nagorno-Karabakh.”

In his response to APA’s question on the resettlement of Syrian
Armenians in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan, the head of
executive authority said that he pities those Armenians: `By all means
our country will return the historical Nagorno Karabakh lands occupied
by Armenia. However, we don’t want the Syrian Armenians, who
co-existed with Muslims for a long time and are familiar with the
religion and humanism of Muslims, to be killed by our bullets and
shells.’

Artsakh leader visits Kashatagh region

Artsakh leader visits Kashatagh region

12:50 16/05/2013 » SOCIETY

President of the Artsakh Republic Bako Sahakyan visited the southern
wing of the Kashatagh region and inspected on site implementation of
several socioeconomic projects.

In the town of Kovsakan, President Sahakyan met the residents and
touched upon a number of issues they raised, noting that problems
faced by the sub-region and their solution will remain at the
spotlight of the authorities.

The President subsequently visited the Tondirget gold mine and got
acquainted with the activities conducted there. He underlined the
significance of the mining industry plant for the Kashatagh region and
the republic in general, adding that it will simultaneously solve a
number of socioeconomic and demographic issues.

Thereupon the President visited the Araks branch of the `Hadrout
Agroeconomy’ CJSC and observed the activities of the structure. Bako
Sahakyan noted that the existence of such an infrastructure in the
Araks valley will promote the development of the area that has a great
agricultural potential, which in its turn will have a substantial
impact on boosting the whole agro-industrial sector of the country.

Bako Sahakyan also visited one of the military units located in the
south of the republic and inspected construction of new barracks
there, the Central Information Department at the Artsakh President’s
Office reported.

Source: Panorama.am

Azerbaijani analyst: Allahshukur Pashazadeh’s Iran visit will be unp

Azerbaijani analyst: Allahshukur Pashazadeh’s Iran visit will be unproductive

15:55 18/05/2013 » ANALYSIS

Allahshukur Pashazadeh’s Iran visit will be unproductive, Azerbaijani
political analyst Vafa Guluzade told Azadliq newspaper in an
interview, according to haqyolu.com Persian language webpage.

Speaking of the scheduled Iran visit of the head of the Caucasus
Muslims Office (CMO), the Azerbaijani analyst said, `Iran wants
Azerbaijan to take practical moves and justify its expectations. But
Azerbaijan is unable to do it. I think Pashazadeh’s Iran visit will be
unproductive.’

Commenting on the recent tension in Iran-Azerbaijan relations, the
author of the article says, `Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev has
three times been invited to visit Iran but none of the visits took
place. To please Iran, the Azerbaijani authorities have sent head of
the Azerbaijani Presidential Administration Ramiz Mehdiyev and head of
the Azerbaijani Presidential Administration’s department for social
and political affairs Ali Hasanov to Tehran but both visits were
unsuccessful.’

`This time the Azerbaijani authorities are sending Pashazadeh to Iran
hopeful that he can solve the existing problems as a result of a
meeting with Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei,’ the
author concludes.

According to the Iranian news agency IRIB, head of the Caucasus
Muslims Office Allahshukur Pashazadeh is today leaving for Iran on an
official visit.

Related: Iranian studies expert: Azerbaijan carries out double foreign
policy towards both West and Islamic counties

Ramiz Mehdiyev to Mahmoud Ahmadinejed: West attempted to carry out
color revolutions in Azerbaijan

http://www.panorama.am/en/politics/2013/05/18/v-gulizade/
http://panorama.am/en/interviews/2013/05/07/a-israyelyan
http://www.panorama.am/en/politics/2013/05/02/iran