L’évêque Shahé Panossian a été élu primat du Liban

LIBAN
L’évêque Shahé Panossian a été élu primat du Liban

Lundi 7 Octobre 2013, le Conseil diocésain du Liban s’est réuni à
l’église Saint Nishan à Beyrouth pour élire un nouveau primat sur une
courte liste de trois noms . Le Conseil a élu l’évêque Shahé Panossian
qui a eu le plus grand nombre de votes .

L’évêque , qui a rejoint la confrérie en 1971, a été ordonné diacre en
1976 et prêtre en 1980. De 1982-2006 il a servi , diversement , en
tant que pasteur de la Prélature de Thessalonique (Grèce), et dans les
prélatures de la Floride , Chicago et New Jersey aux Etats- Unis
d’Amérique.

En 2006, le Père Panossian est revenu au Liban comme doyen du
Séminaire jusqu’en 2011. En 2008, il a été ordonné évêque et depuis
2011, il a été vicaire pour le Koweït et les pays du Golfe.

Après avoir été informé de l’élection le Catholicos a approuvé
l’élection et a félicité les membres du Conseil et l’évêque .

dimanche 3 novembre 2013,
Stéphane ©armenews.com
‘304

http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article

BAKU: Lack Of Response To Russian Commander’s Remarks

LACK OF RESPONSE TO RUSSIAN COMMANDER’S REMARKS

Turan news agency, Azerbaijan
Oct 31 2013

Baku, 31 October: It seems that in its concern over the fate of
Orxan Zeynalov [Azerbaijani national charged with murder in Russia]
the Azerbaijani government has finally lost its bearings and its
statements about defending national interests sound preposterous.

In recent weeks the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry, parliament,
prosecutor-general, the Azerbaijani embassy in Moscow and many others
are only busy with defending the national dignity of Azerbaijanis in
Russia. It appears that for all these and other government bodies the
case of Orxan Zeynalov has assumed such crucial importance that they
have lost the ability to see or hear anything else.

Otherwise, our diplomats, politicians and statesmen would not fail
to notice a scandalous statement by Andrey Ruzinskiy, commander of
military base No 102 in Armenia.

In an interview with the Krasnaya Zvezda newspaper back on 10 October
this colonel said:

“The military and political situation in the military base’s zone of
responsibility remains troubled and is characterized by the existence
of a number of destabilizing factors linked to the possibility of an
escalation of the confrontation in the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict
zone. If the Azerbaijani leadership was to adopt a decision to restore
jurisdiction over Nagornyy Karabakh by forceful means, the military
base could enter into an armed conflict in accordance with the Russian
Federation’s treaty obligations with the framework of the Collective
Security Treaty Organization [CSTO]”.

Did Baku respond to this and did the embassy in Moscow submit a note
to the Russian Foreign Ministry?

Yes, they reacted – by sending two notes and demanding that Orxan
Zeynalov’s rights be protected.

Experience shows that the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry and other
agencies respond rapidly to negative reports about violations of
human rights and democracy, to the criticism of the ruling family
and corruption in the country. These are the government’s priorities.

It follows that threats by foreign country to resort to military force
against Azerbaijan are not important enough to warrant a response –
that is, this issue is not a priority.

It is very interesting that the Russian Defence Ministry did not
disavow Col Ruzinskiy’s statement, although Collective Security
Treaty Organization Chairman Nikolay Bordyuzha has repeatedly said
that Nagornyy Karabakh is not a zone of responsibility for the CSTO,
since de jure this is Azerbaijan’s territory.

As for military base No 102 in Armenia, it has a complement of 13 main
combat subunits and 17 comprehensive support subunits. It includes a
surface-to-air missile division equipped with S-300V surface-to-air
missiles, a surface-to-air missile division armed with BUK-M1-2
surface-to-air missiles, a Smerch rocket-propelled artillery battery,
and an airbase with a squadron of MiG-29 warplanes. According to
some reports, the number of servicemen stands at 3,000 people and
continues to increase.

During joint exercises with the Armenian armed forces this year
they worked on managing military operations, repelling attacks,
counteroffensive against a retreating opponent and others.

Ruzinskiy also said that the Erebuni airbase is to be reinforced –
combat and military-transport helicopters will be located alongside
MiG-29 fighters. The entire package of requisite bilateral documents
has already been signed, the colonel said.

[Translated from Russian]

Armenian Soldier Killed In Fresh Border Incident

ARMENIAN SOLDIER KILLED IN FRESH BORDER INCIDENT

Institute for War and Peace Reporting , UK
IWPR Caucasus Reporting #707
Nov 1 2013

Incident part of recurring cycle as civilians try to earn a living
close to Azerbaijani and Armenian army lines.

By Lilit Arakelyan – Caucasus

An incident in which Azerbaijani troops killed an Armenian soldier
close to the border between the two countries has sparked fresh calls
for mediators to work on confidence-building measures.

On October 22, troops on the Azerbaijani side of the border opened
fire on a vehicle travelling along a road between the towns of Berd
and Ijevan in the Tavush region of northeast Armenia. The vehicle was
carrying soldiers returning to their posts, and one of them, Private
Garik Poghosyan, was killed. Three other conscripts were injured.

Ten days earlier, Hayk Kosakyan, a 29-year-old civilian, was wounded
by gunfire from the Azerbaijani side while he was out working in
fields belonging to the village of Nerkin Karmiraghbyur. Hit in the
left side, he was taken to hospital in the town of Berd.

Open war between Armenian and Azerbaijani forces ended in 1994 with
the ceasefire that halted the Nagorny Karabakh war. No peace deal
was signed, however, and negotiations on conflict settlement and on
Karabakh’s future status, mediated by the OSCE’s Minsk Group, have
made little progress. The Armenian administration in control of Nagorny
Karabakh regards itself as independent, but has not won international
recognition, and Azerbaijan continues to claim sovereignty.

Troops face each other along the border between Azerbaijan and Armenia,
as well as along the “line of control” that separates the hostile armed
forces around Karabakh. Exchanges of gunfire over these front lines
are frequent, and each side generally accuses the other of shooting
first. (See Gunfire as Extension of Politics on Azeri-Armenian Border.)

On October 17, OSCE monitors were forced to call off an inspection
after Azerbaijani troops fired at Armenian positions near Hadrut
in Karabakh.

The Armenian defence ministry told IWPR that the Azerbaijanis had
broken the ceasefire nearly 8,000 times between January and July,
resulting in the deaths of three soldiers and ten injuries.

George Tabakyan, founder of the Sahman (Border) NGO, which runs
agricultural, educational and cultural projects in villages along
Armenia’s frontier, described the precarious conditions in which
people live their lives there.

“They [Azerbaijanis] are putting pressure on the residents of border
villages to force them to leave their homes. They are still living
there, but at any time their homes, their children’s playgrounds and
the schools they attend might come under fire,” Tabakyan told IWPR.

“Over these 20 years, people in frontier villages have learned to be
cautious and to know which areas are is dangerous and which are safe,
and where they can hide from bullets.”

Kosakyan, who comes from the village of Navur, told IWPR that
Azerbaijan soldiers deliberately shot at him and two companions while
they were out picking grapes.

“They fired at our car from Azerbaijani positions and hit me. I
was the first to get out. I knew there was often shooting in that
place, but the last time I’d gone there, things were quiet,” he
said. “Since grapes don’t grow in Navur, we’d come to pick them in
Nerkin Karmiraghbyur. That’s how we ended up under fire from the
Azerbaijanis.”

Some 1,160 people live in the village Nerkin Karmiraghbyur, most
working as farmers and livestock herds. This border area is more
fertile than most parts of Armenia, but most of it lies empty because
locals are afraid to stray too close to the Azerbaijani lines.

“People try to make ends meet by working in the fields. But there’s
never a guarantee they won’t come under fire,” Manvel Kamendatyan,
who heads the village administration, told IWPR.

Almost every house in the village bears the scars of bullets, and
local children know they have to keep close to walls when they are out,
and hide in the basement if they hear shooting. In such circumstances,
many villagers have left to seek better lives elsewhere.

“Every year, seven or eight people from our village go abroad to earn
money. Many of them want to go and resettle their whole families in
other places, but they aren’t able to,” Kamendatyan said.

Alexander Iskandaryan, director of the Caucasus Institute, says that
outbreaks of shooting typically coincide with events at political
level, such as Minsk Group meetings.

“With this incident, I’d look for a parallel in the presidential
election in Azerbaijan,” he said, referring to the October 9 polls
won by the incumbent, Ilham Aliyev.

Armenian defence ministry spokesman Artsrun Hovhannisyan said the
Minsk Group should try to build greater trust between the two sides
by installing telephones to allow army officers on either side to
contact one another when incidents happened. (See Civilian Deaths
Underline Armenia-Azerbaijan Tensions for one recent case where a
fatality seemed avoidable.)

“Azerbaijan constantly refuses to take a constructive approach to
this problem,” Hovhannisyan told IWPR.

In Azerbaijan, analysts said Armenian calls for more mediation and
better communication were merely a ploy to cement the status quo
on the ground, in other words Armenian control over Karabakh and
neighbouring districts.

“People are being killed on the front line because the conflict
is still going on,” Farhad Mammadov, director of the presidential
Centre for Strategic Studies, told IWPR. “The Armenians want to freeze
this conflict. People are dying and will continue to die because no
agreement has been signed.”

Most experts doubt that the Minsk Group, which is chaired jointly by
Russia, the United States and France, has the leverage it would need
to stop armed forces on either side from firing at one another.

According to Iskandaryan, “The Minsk Group mediators are trying to
persuade the two sides to come to a mutual understanding. They are
trying to maintain the status quo and the state of parity so that the
war doesn’t start again. However, parity will not stop the shootings
on the border, so such incidents are sadly going to continue.”

Lilit Arakelyan is a reporter for in Armenia. IWPR’s
Azerbaijan country director, Shahin Rzayev, provided additional
reporting from Baku.

http://iwpr.net/report-news/armenian-soldier-killed-fresh-border-incident
www.medialab.am

Sarkisian Must Go, Says Ter-Petrosian

SARKISIAN MUST GO, SAYS TER-PETROSIAN

By MassisPost

Updated: October 30, 2013

YEREVAN – Opposition leader Levon Ter-Petrosian called for President
Serzh Sarkisian’s immediate resignation on Wednesday, saying that he
has brought Armenia into disrepute and is leading it to ruin with his
“adventurist” foreign policy.

In a written statement posted on ilur.am, Ter-Petrosian declared
that Sarkisian must be granted legal immunity from prosecution and
any asset confiscation if he agrees to step down.

“Armenia needs radical systemic reforms,” said the leader of the
opposition Armenian National Congress (HAK). “Expecting Serzh Sarkisian
to be able to implement those reforms is tantamount to political
blindness. Only ‘idealist’ European bureaucrats could afford the
‘naivety’ of trying to turn that individual into a reformer.”

“Every day of his rule is a loss for Armenia and Artsakh
(Nagorno-Karabakh) in the demographic, economic, material, political
and moral-psychological senses,” continued Ter-Petrosian.

Armenia, he said, needs a new president “capable of restoring the
country’s international reputation as a trustworthy and responsible
partner.” Sarkisian has destroyed that reputation with his “adventurist
political wanderings” between the West and Russia that could have
“disastrous consequences” for Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh, he claimed.

Ter-Petrosian, who served as Armenia’s first president from 1991-1998,
clearly referred to Sarkisian’s unexpected decision last month to join
a Russian-led alliance of ex-Soviet states at the expense of a much
closer relationship with the European Union. He said earlier that
Sarkisian thus duped the EU and humiliated Armenia. Still, unlike
other opposition leaders, Ter-Petrosian stopped short of opposing
Armenian membership of the Russian-dominated bloc.

The HAK leader also stated on Wednesday that he would not run for
president in the event of Sarkisian’s resignation. He said Robert
Kocharian, another ex-president who handed over power to the current
head of state in 2008, must also not seek to return to power.

http://massispost.com/archives/9898

Name Of Judge Working With US Secret Services Becomes Known

NAME OF JUDGE WORKING WITH US SECRET SERVICES BECOMES KNOWN

Friday,
November
01

The name of the Armenian judge who, upon his arrival in the United
States, promised to give information to U.S. secret services has
become known, according to ‘Hraparak’. The matter concerns Suren
Ghazarian, a judge of the first instance court of Yerevan’s Arabkir
and Kanaker-Zeytun administrative districts.

“Ghazarian was dismissed from his job in 2010. He declared he was
dismissed by the decision of the Cassation Court’s chairman Arman
Mkrtumian after he didn’t obey the instructions from above during
examination of a case. The reason was the verdict on the case
infringing on the interests of Yukos and Rosneft companies. The U.S.

Department of State touched upon that issue in its annual 2012 report,”
the paper says.

TODAY, 13:01

Aysor.am

Moldovan Notorious Advocate Cries At Meeting With Her Azerbaijani Co

MOLDOVAN NOTORIOUS ADVOCATE CRIES AT MEETING WITH HER AZERBAIJANI COUNTERPART

15:37, 1 November, 2013

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 1, ARMENPRESS: The Moldovan Parliamentary
Ombudsperson Aurelia Grigoriu keeps on distorting the reality
in her statements on Armenia. Armenpress reports, quoting the
Azerbaijani APA Agency, that the Azerbaijani Commissioner for Human
Rights (Ombudsperson) Elmira Suleymanova and the Moldovan notorious
Parliamentary Advocate Aurelia Grigoriu met in Baku. Speaking about her
speech at the Armenian Parliament, Grigoriu got excited and couldn’t
help crying: “I don’t even want to remember those days. It was a very
difficult time. However, I don’t repent”.

Suleymanova spoke about Grigoriu’s speech at the Armenian Parliament
and thanked her for the courageous speech. She also expressed pleasure
with her counterpart’s visit to Azerbaijan and said that Azerbaijan
is her homeland as well.

At the end of the meeting, Grigoriu was awarded with an honorary
medal for her courage and protecting human rights.

Earlier the Azerbaijani “Heydar Aliyev” foundation announced that human
rights defender in Moldovan parliament, lawyer Aurelia Grigoriu was
awarded with golden medal “Heydar Aliyev” “for supporting the policy
of Turkic states, merit in the protection of human rights and moving
forward Azerbaijani realities in the whole world”.

During her report “The protection of human rights and security in
“frozen conflicts” areas” in framework of in framework of Pan-European
Conference “The European Standards of Rule of Law and the Scope of
Discretion of Powers in the Member States of the Council of Europe”,
the Parliamentary Advocate of the Republic of Moldova Aurelia
Grigoriu made a statement, which does not have any connection
to the reality. She announced that “Armenia occupied 20% of the
Azerbaijan’s territory and the Khojalu Genocide was implemented by
the Armenians”. The Parliamentary Advocate of the Republic of Moldova
called Armenia “an aggressor country”.

This statement received negative reaction both in Armenia and Moldova.

Many political and public figures condemned Grigoriu’s statement
considering it provocative.

Later it was found out that Aurelia Grigoriu 2 weeks ago before
visiting Yerevan had been in Baku. In internet were spread her photos
and notes in Facebook where she expresses her love towards Azerbaijan.

After the scandal Grigoriu deleted the photos from her profile.

http://armenpress.am/eng/news/738601/moldovan-notorious-advocate-cries-at-meeting-with-her-azerbaijani-counterpart.html

Average Price For One Square Meter In Apartment Block In Yerevan AMD

AVERAGE PRICE FOR ONE SQUARE METER IN APARTMENT BLOCK IN YEREVAN AMD 270,800 DRAMS IN JAN-SEPT 2013

YEREVAN, November 1. /ARKA/. One square meter in apartment block in
Yerevan cost AMD 270,800 drams, on average, in Jan-Sept 2013 – 6.2%
year-on-year increase, the State Real Estate Cadastre of Armenia
reports.

The highest average price was recorded in Yerevan’s district of Kentron
– AMD 426,700, and the lowest price in Nubarashen – AMD 150,100.

One square meter in single-family detached homes sold at AMD 285,700,
on average, in Yerevan in Jan-Sept 2013 – 4.5% increase, compared
with Jan-Sept 2012.

Prices for one square meter in apartment blocks in the country’s
provinces rose 4.9%.

A slight price rise is seen all over the country but Spitak, Tumanyan,
Tsakhkadzor, Dastakert and Shamlug.

Tsakhkadzor was singled out for the highest average price – AMD
292,500 and Dastakert and Shamlug for the lowest price – AMD 8,000.

($1 – 405.03). .—0— – See more at:

http://arka.am/en/news/economy/average_price_for_one_square_meter_in_apartment_block_in_yerevan_amd_270_800_drams_in_jan_sept_2013/#sthash.GS18iphl.dpuf

Armenia’s Population Declines By 10,000 Since Beginning Of 2013

ARMENIA’S POPULATION DECLINES BY 10,000 SINCE BEGINNING OF 2013

November 1, 2013 – 14:11 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – Armenia’s population declined by 10,000 people as
of October 1, 2013, since the beginning of the year, ARKA reports.

As of October 1, number of population was 3,017,000 people, of them
1,913,400 living in towns and 1,103,600 being rural residents.

According to the National Statistical Service, negative migration
balance exceeds the population growth.

Armenia’s border e-management system database points to a total of
3,668,400 trips through the country’s checkpoints in January-September.

Number of arrivals in the country totaled 1,780,206 in the reporting
period (increase of 11.6% against January-September 2012); number of
departures was 1,888,183 (11.5% increase). Passenger traffic balance
(difference between arrivals and departures) was 122,200 trips
(increase of 11.7%).

Number of children born in the nine months dropped by 1.9% to 30,477,
compared to the same period in 2012. Number of deaths declined by 3%
to 20,268.

As Gagiik Makaryan, the chairman of the Union of Employers of Armenia,
said in October, only 2-3% of migrants return to Armenia for permanent
residence.

http://www.panarmenian.net/eng/news/172083/

Watch Your Web: Armenian Police’s Reported Capability To "Snoop" On

WATCH YOUR WEB: ARMENIAN POLICE’S REPORTED CAPABILITY TO “SNOOP” ON INTERNET USERS RAISES CONCERNS

HUMAN RIGHTS | 01.11.13 | 14:08

Grigori Saghyan

By SIRANUYSH GEVORGYAN
ArmeniaNow reporter

Armenia appears to have got its “share” of the continuing global
“snooping” scandal as allegations have been made in the local media
about the police having acquired the capability of spying on internet
users.

The pro-opposition Haykakan Zhamanak daily, citing its own sources,
wrote this week that while so far security agencies in Armenia have
been engaged in wiretapping people’s phones and following their
conversations, then now their opportunities will be expanded as the
police have acquired the capability of controlling the internet domain.

“The Russian militia (police) has an ‘undeniable’ role in this as
it has donated a large amount of equipment to its junior partner. In
summer our specialists on combat against cyber crime, in particular
Police Chief Vova Gasparyan, were sent on a business trip to Sochi
where there was a ceremonial session and they got a promise of
assistance. Now ‘certain circles’ are concerned that the new capacity
will be used against the ‘internal enemy’,” alleged the newspaper.

The news spread quickly on online social networking sites, and
people began to worry that the police might control their private
correspondence and other online activity.

Deputy Director of the Internet Society of Armenia organization Grigori
Saghyan says that control of the internet and telephone conversations
is no news, as, if necessary, the legislation of Armenia entitles
law-enforcement agencies to engage in such activities.

“And telephone operators are obliged to provide technical access
so that in cases prescribed by law the police could have access to
conversations that they consider necessary to listen to,” says Saghyan.

Under the Armenian law on electronic communications, in cases
prescribed by law all operators and service providers shall
provide law-enforcement and national security agents with access to
communication equipment, infrastructure, connecting/disconnecting,
routing and other similar devices, including devices required for
the implementation of secret listening.

“The law also stipulates that the operator has no right to secretly
listen [to conversations] itself,” says Saghyan.

The internet expert connects the heightened public interest towards
wiretapping-related allegations with the revelations made by former
U.S. intelligence agent Edward Snowden. The 30-year-old computer
specialist, who has been granted political asylum in Russia, revealed
to the public earlier this year that American special services have
been collecting data from major internet companies about communications
of online social network users.

Recently the international “snooping” scandal acquired a new dimension
after leading western publications revealed that Washington has been
eavesdropping on European leaders, including German Chancellor Angela
Merkel, on the United Nations headquarters, and so on.

The Armenian expert, speaking about control of data on the internet,
says that Armenia does not have such technical means to be able to
follow the online activities of people, therefore it needs to import
these facilities.

“There is a technical way to do that in Russia, it is called ‘a
system of operative-investigative measures’, which allows you to
collect data,” says Saghyan, stressing that only, if necessary,
and in accordance with corresponding procedures can law-enforcement
agencies secretly follow internet users’ activities, otherwise the
evidence obtained this way will not be considered legal in courts.

The police did not deny that it could now be in possession of such
equipment. “The police always obtain appropriate technical means,
there is a unit for fighting cyber crime, but this fight is being
carried out for the benefit of the users,” said police spokesman
Ashot Aharonyan said.

http://armenianow.com/society/human_rights/49699/armenia_internet_spying_police_equipment_it

Is New Scandal Coming Up?

IS NEW SCANDAL COMING UP?

Recently the ambassador of Poland Zdzislaw Raczynski has made a
sensational statement while dwelling on the EU-Armenia Association
Agreement. “I am sure this agreement is known to our Russian
counterparts, and they know this is just a regulatory document.” He
also said that the signatories are the European Commission and Armenia
and, as far as he knows, none of the sides has rejected it, and it
is still on the table though for the time being there is no progress.

The deputy minister of foreign affairs of Armenia Zohrab Mnatsakanyan
who used to be the chief negotiator of the Association Agreement on the
Armenian side has stated at the National Assembly that this agreement
does not contain any clause limiting the sovereignty of Armenia.

Yesterday it was painful to listen to Zohrab Mnatsakanyan who is one
of the rare professionals of Armenian diplomacy. In fact, he was not
given an opportunity to inform the public regularly on the process
and details of the negotiations to bring clarity into the prospects
of Armenia headed for the EU.

Instead, the Russian “agency” in Armenia was doing a campaign over
the period, using the language of blackmail and threats, presenting
association with the EU as a threat hanging over Armenia’s head.

It turns out that the Armenian side has not been allowed to talk
about the agreement. Instead, the Russian agency is presenting it in
the light that favors Russia.

The reason why Moscow resorted to blackmail and threats was its
awareness of the meaning of association to Armenia’s future. And they
got to work, banning publication of the text of the agreement when
the European side urged to publish it.

The announcement of the ambassador of Poland was a sensation in
the sense that the details of the agreement were known to “Russian
counterparts”. Now the question occurs why the Russian side or just
a third country was aware of the negotiations between the European
Commission and Armenia while the Armenian public was deprived of a
chance to get acquainted with the text.

Who was the “conductor” of Moscow’s policy in Armenia and how did
the Russian side learn about the details of the talks?

There are rumors that the Armenian embassies in leading states provide
“leakages” to the Russian embassies. It is not understood why there
was a need to pass information to the Russians indirectly. Now it is
already clear why. The third country is Belarus through whose pipes
information was passed (one can remember the behavior of Lukashenko
and his Armenian friends).

Yesterday the members of parliament asked deputy minister of foreign
affairs Shavarsh Kocharyan whether the MFA is going to address the
outrageous comments on the First Russian Channel. Shavarsh Kocharyan
said they did not take any measures publicly but “they have found
out through their pipes that whatever was said during that TV show
was not the official stance of Russia”.

It’s funny, isn’t it? If not tragedy, of course. In any normal
country the MFA would be dissolved after such a statement, at least
for inaction, while the law enforcement agencies would start taking
interest in their leadership. However, Moscow will not allow this to
happen because the Armenian MFA is a wonderful source of information
and a harmless “branch office” with jammed “pipes”.

The minister of foreign affairs has left for Germany, the country where
he negotiated with EU officials on further relations with the EU. It
is interesting whether the Germans or diplomats of other European
countries will tell him anything confidential. Or will they prefer
telling Moscow directly which learns news about Yerevan earlier than
these news get to Yerevan. If they ever get there at all.

Haik Aramyan 11:55 01/11/2013 Story from Lragir.am News:

http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/31217