ANKARA: Green Shoots

GREEN SHOOTS

Cihan News Agency (CNA), Turkey
November 5, 2013 Tuesday

ISTANBUL (CIHAN)- Turkey’s halting march toward better democratic
standards often appears frustratingly slow, marred by setbacks like
the narrowing space for press freedom or the brutal handling of the
Gezi unrest.

It is, however, useful to take stock occasionally and identify issues
where progress has been achieved. Rewinding the tape allows us to
measure the distance covered, and it offers hope for the future.

The long-awaited arrival in Parliament of the headscarved Justice
and Development Party (AKP) deputies on Oct. 31 turned out to be so
uneventful that it was tempting to ask “What was all the fuss about?”

Their presence at Parliament seemed perfectly natural — and indeed it
was in a country where some 60 percent of women wear a headscarf. But
for those who had witnessed the way Merve Kavakci was hounded out of
Parliament — and even stripped of her Turkish nationality — after
her election in 1999, there was no underestimating the significance
of this development.

With the headscarf issue now largely defused, we can hope that tension
will decrease and the focus will turn to the contribution women can
make in the political arena and in public life, rather than on what
they choose to wear. The recent incident of the female TV presenter who
lost her job for showing too much cleavage has raised concerns that the
freedoms handed out to women — unfairly sidelined for too long — are
being taken away from others. Putting an end to the injustice that kept
covered women out of the public sphere satisfies the AKP’s constituency
and Turkey’s democrats, but in itself it doesn’t constitute proof of
the party’s support for the rights of individual women.

It also remains to be seen if the lifting of what was never a formal
ban will encourage the AKP to field more women candidates in the
upcoming local elections. Several of the party’s founding members were
women who, until now, could only be active in the background. Will
they play a more visible role in the future?

Another important sign of change, in a very different area, was evident
this weekend at Bogazici University, where the Hrant Dink Foundation
was hosting a conference on Islamized Armenians. One doesn’t have to
go back very far in time to remember the outcry that followed the
announcement in 2005 that the same university was planning to hold
a conference on the Ottoman Armenians. At the time, Cemil Cicek,
who is currently speaker of Parliament, accused the organizers of
“stabbing Turkey in the back.” The gathering had to be canceled and
it was eventually held, weeks later, at Istanbul Bilgi University —
an important threshold was crossed.

This time, no such controversy has erupted and the packed audience
showed that interest in that dark period of Turkey’s history has
grown considerably. The Armenian issue used to be mentioned mainly
when a foreign nation chose to recognize the genocide, triggering
a diplomatic spat with Turkey. In recent years, books like “My
Grandmother: A Memoir,” written by the Dink family lawyer Fethiye
Cetin, who revealed her grandmother’s long-hidden Armenian identity,
have turned the spotlight on personal stories.

In her introductory speech at the conference, Ayse Gul Altinay
mentioned that up to 200,000 Armenians may have survived the massacres
and integrated into Muslim Turkish, Kurdish or Arab society. This
means that today, three, or even four generations later, aside from
the members of the recognized Armenian minority in Turkey, millions
of people in this country have ancestors of Armenian origin, whether
they are aware of it or not. Now that the wall of silence has been
breached, more individual stories of tragedy, death and survival will
no doubt emerge, further broadening the space for debate.

Confronting the past, making it personal, will perhaps enable Turkey
to make peace with itself and reclaim its cultural diversity. If
progress in the Kurdish peace process is still slow, a degree of
distance allows us to spot green shoots of progress and an evolution
of public perceptions on this front too, even if they remain very
patchy and in need of careful nurturing.

NICOLE POPE (Cihan/Today’s Zaman) CIHAN

Police Stop Opposition March In Armenia, Arrest 20

POLICE STOP OPPOSITION MARCH IN ARMENIA, ARREST 20

Reuters
Nov 5 2013

YEREVAN | Tue Nov 5, 2013 12:00pm EST

YEREVAN Nov 5 (Reuters) – Armenian police detained 20 people in
clashes on Tuesday with anti-government protesters armed with sticks
and firecrackers who tried to march on the presidential palace,
witnesses said.

President Serzh Sarksyan was re-elected to a second five-year term in
February but independent monitors said the vote lacked real competition
and some small street protests flared for a short time afterward.

Tuesday’s protest march, led by Shant Arutyunian, a flamboyant
opposition activist who ran in the 1999 parliamentary election,
was blocked by police en route to the presidential palace.

Scuffles ensued as dozens of protesters wearing Guy Fawkes masks
on the backs of their heads threw large firecrackers at policemen,
injuring several, a police spokesman said.

Guy Fawkes, a 17th century English Catholic, was the best-known
conspirator in a plot to blow up the English parliament.

In March, Armenia’s Constitutional Court rejected claims by two
unsuccessful presidential candidates that the Feb. 18 vote was rigged,
upholding Sarksyan’s re-election.

Armenia, a landlocked former Soviet republic of 3 million people,
has a common security treaty with Russia and hosts of one of Moscow’s
few foreign military bases.

Investors worry over signs of instability in the South Caucasus region,
a key transit route for Caspian energy resources to Europe.

Violence after the 2008 election that first brought Sarksyan in power
killed 10 people.

Armenia also remains in territorial dispute with neighbouring
Azerbaijan two decades after a war between the two over the enclave
of Nagorno-Karabakh killed some 30,000 people. (Reporting By Hasmik
Lazarian, Writing by Alexei Anishchuk)

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/11/05/armenia-clashes-idUSL5N0IQ3OG20131105

Armenia Does Not See Necessity To Engage CSTO Or Russia To Confront

ARMENIA DOES NOT SEE NECESSITY TO ENGAGE CSTO OR RUSSIA TO CONFRONT AGGRESSION BY AZERBAIJAN: PRESS SECRETARY OF DEFENSE MINISTRY

20:01, 5 November, 2013

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 5, ARMENPRESS. The military-political leadership of
the Republic of Armenia has stated for several times that they don’t
see the necessity to engage CSTO or Russia to confront aggression
on part of Azerbaijan, and that capabilities of our Armed Forces are
sufficient enough to implement any operation task. The CSTO membership
and the Armenian-Russian military cooperation are directed to prevent
possible aggression on part of a third country. Armenpress reports that
the press secretary of the Defense Minister of the Republic of Armenia
Artsrun Hovhannisyan noted it in his page of Facebook touching upon
the fact that the newly-appointed Minister of Defense of Azerbaijan
asked explanations from OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs about the recent
interview of the commander of the 102nd military base in Gyumri to
“Kraznaya Zvezda” newspaper.

The Commander of the 102nd Russian military base deployed in Gyumri,
the Armenian Colonel Andrey Ruzinsky stated that if Azerbaijan
launches operation in Nagorno-Karabakh, Russian military base in
Armenia may be involved in the conflict. Armenpress reports that in
the interview with “Krasnaya Zvezda” official newspaper, touching
upon the military-political situation in the region, for which the
military base responsible, Ruzinsky noted that “it is characterized
by a number of factors causing instability due to the possibility of
confrontation in the region of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict”.

“If the Azerbaijani authorities decide to restore the jurisdiction
over Nagorno Karabakh by force, the military base may enter into an
armed conflict in accordance with the legal obligations of the Russian
Federation within the framework of the Collective Security Treaty”,
– said Ruzinsky.

Ruzinsky noted that the military base is a compound that is ready
for immediate intervention: “Its structure includes 13 major combat
units and 17 units of comprehensive support. This force is able to
successfully fulfill the related tasks. I should add that the main
feature of the Russian military base in Armenia is anti-aircraft
missile battalion. It has been equipped with BUK-M1-2 anti-aircraft
complex, Smerch artillery battery and the air base with a squadron
of MiG- 29 warplanes”.

Artsrun Hovhannisyan also pointed out that the staff of the Defense
Minister of Azerbaijan perhaps did not inform the latter about Article
4 of CSTO Treaty and Protocol 5 on the status of Russian military
base in Armenia signed in August, 2010 in a proper manner.

© 2009 ARMENPRESS.am

http://armenpress.am/eng/news/738996/armenia-does-not-see-necessity-to-engage-csto-or-russia-to-confront-aggression-by-azerbaijan-press.html

Armenian President, Minsk Group Co-Chairs Discuss The Current Stage

ARMENIAN PRESIDENT, MINSK GROUP CO-CHAIRS DISCUSS THE CURRENT STAGE AND PERSPECTIVES OF KARABAKH TALKS

18:03 05.11.2013

Armenia, OSCE Minsk Group, Serzh Sargsyan

Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan received the Co-Chairs of the OSCE
Minsk Group, Ambassadors Igor Popov (Russia), James Warlick (USA)
and Jacques Faure (France) and the Personal Representative of the
OSCE Chairman-in-Office Andrzej Kasprzyk.

The interlocutors discussed issues related to the current stage and
the future steps in the negotiation process on the settlement of the
Karabakh conflict.

http://www.armradio.am/en/2013/11/05/armenian-president-minsk-group-co-chairs-discuss-the-current-stage-and-perspectives-of-karabakh-talks/

Russia Occupies Armenia – Analyst

RUSSIA OCCUPIES ARMENIA – ANALYST

November 05, 2013 | 16:26

YEREVAN. – The current phase in Armenian-Russian relations can be
characterized as Armenia’s occupation by Russia.

Political andInternationalStudiesCenter analyst Ruben Mehrabyan told
the aforesaid to Armenian News-NEWS.am.

In Mehrabyan’s words, prior to Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan’s
September 3 statement on joining the Russia-led Customs Union, people
were saying that Armenia had become a vassal of Russia. Now, however,
these relations have taken on elements of occupation.

The political scientist stressed that Armenia will not benefit at
all from joining the Customs Union and, instead, it will face many
difficulties.

“All four neighbors of Armenia seek rapprochement with Europe. Even
Iran is achieving significant progress in the discourse with Europe,”
he added.

Against this backdrop, as per the analyst, Armenia declared its
intention to join the Customs Union and, as a result, it became a
regional tool in the hands of Russian policy.

“This means that Armenia may start to be perceived by its neighbors
as a source of threat,” Mehrabyan noted.

He added that Russia is attempting to apply pressure on Azerbaijan
in terms of energy supply to Europe and, at the same time,
Nagorno-Karabakh will become a pressure tool in the hands of official
Moscow.

“In other words, our security has seriously been affected, since we
have turned from a subject into an object,” Ruben Mehrabyan concluded.

News from Armenia – NEWS.am

Marxist Leader Says Karabakh Should Become Part Of Russia

MARXIST LEADER SAYS KARABAKH SHOULD BECOME PART OF RUSSIA

16:00 / 05.11.2013

Leader of Armenia’s Marxists Union Davit Hakobyan said Karabakh must
be included in the Russia’s territory and be an autonomous republic.

Speaking to reporters today he said the National Assembly must already
start the process.

“Armenia must concede its seat at the table of negotiations to Karabakh
as a self-determining and negotiating side. Afterwards Karabakh will
decide whether to become part of Armenia, Russia or Azerbaijan,”
he stressed, adding that he is for Russia. He said without Russia
Armenia will not be able to guard its borders.

http://nyut.am/archives/81207?lang=en

From Ataturk To Erdogan: A Two-Day Conference In Yerevan

FROM ATATURK TO ERDOGAN: A TWO-DAY CONFERENCE IN YEREVAN

17:38 05.11.2013

Alisa Gevorgyan
Public Radio of Armenia

A two-day international conference on “Ninety years of the Republic of
Turkey: from Ataturk to Erdogan” kicked off in Yerevan today at the
initiative of the Oriental Studies Institute of the National Academy
of Sciences. It focuses on the history of the Republic of Turkey,
different aspects of its domestic and foreign policy. Experts of
Turkish studies, historians, philologists and philosophers from
Armenia, Russia and Turkey participate in the conference.

Professor of the Turkish Aegean University Tanju Tosun was scheduled
to make a report on the first day of the conference, but he has not
even arrived in Yerevan because of technical problems in Turkey.

“Irrespective of political relations, the historic issues of the
neighboring country must be scientifically discussed,” Academician
Vladimir Barkhudaryan said in his opening remarks.

Director of the Oriental Studies Institute Ruben Safrastyan noted that
during the conference they will try to refer to the most important
issues of the history of the Turkish Republic, its ideology, domestic
and foreign policy.

The conference is particularly important for the discussion of issues
related to the Armenian Genocide. The report by Anush Hovhannisyan,
an expert of Turkish studies, was dedicated to the peculiarities of
coverage of the Armenian Issue in the Turkish official historiography.

According to her, the textbooks are the most eloquent in this regard.

The study of textbooks shows the spirit the state educates and brings
up its citizens and the society in.

“Of course there are positive trends in the Turkish society. The world
has become smaller, the information has become more transparent,”
she said, adding, however, that the Turkish historiography leaves a
number of issues unanswered.

The Republic of Turkey is 90. “It’s a state, the territory of which
encompassed 9/10 of our historic Motherland, a state, whose history
represents a series of uninterrupted genocides,” expert of regional
studies, analyst Sargis Hatspanyan said.

“Just 15 months are left before the 100th anniversary of the Armenian
Genocide. Armenia has not formulated any clear demands from Turkey,”
Saris Hatspanyan said. According to him, it’s not clear what Armenians
are demanding from Turkey and the world.

http://www.armradio.am/en/2013/11/05/from-ataturk-to-erdogan-a-two-day-conference-in-yerevan/

No Criminal Proceedings Against Fugitive Soldiers, Says Defense Mini

NO CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST FUGITIVE SOLDIERS, SAYS DEFENSE MINISTRY OFFICIAL

NEWS | 05.11.13 | 10:22

The four soldiers who escaped from a Yerevan garrison hospital last
weekend will not face any criminal liability over their service
misconduct, said Mary Sargsyan, a senior officer at the Defense
Ministry’s Investigative Service, told Pastinfo news agency.

She added that materials were being prepared for an inquest.

Earlier, Defense Ministry spokesman Artsrun Harutyunyan also said
that it was possible that no proceedings would be launched considering
that the soldiers were patients of a psychiatric department and that
medical findings were needed.

A brawl occurred among four servicemen at the hospital on Saturday
evening in which the doctor on duty was also attacked. Subsequently,
the four escaped the facility, but all were traced and returned to
the hospital.

http://armenianow.com/news/49771/armenia_fugitive_soldiers_army_criminal_liability

From The History Of Armenian Coins. Money Circulation In USSR

FROM THE HISTORY OF ARMENIAN COINS. MONEY CIRCULATION IN USSR

The mintage stopped in 1925 and then re-started in 1926, when coins
with the value of 1, 2, 3 and 5 kopecks were made of aluminum bronze.

With formation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR)
in 1924, the government orders to exchange all types of currency
in circulation for USSR bank notes. At that time, these were bank
notes with the value of 1, 3, 5, 10 and 25 chervontsy (chervonets –
a ten-ruble bank note) and gold coin, also called chervonets, thus
making a two-chervonets currency system: the gold-based and soviet,
which were devaluating.

November 5, 2013

PanARMENIAN.Net – Also in 1924, new treasury notes with the value of 1,
3 and 5 rubles were issued as subsidiary for chervontsy.

After a long break, mintage re-started. The coins of the Russian Soviet
Federative Socialist Republic had the value of 10, 15 and 20 kopecks
(billon), as well as 50 kopecks and 1 ruble (silver). The coins of the
USSR were: 1, 2, 3, 5 kopecks (copper), 10, 15, 20 kopecks (billon)
and 50 kopecks, 1 ruble (silver). In 1925-1928, a copper coin with
the value of half-kopeck was put into circulation.

The mintage stopped in 1925 and then re-started in 1926, when coins
with the value of 1, 2, 3 and 5 kopecks were made of aluminum bronze.

In 1927, mintage of silver coins was stopped while billon coins were
made till 1931. Coins valued at 10, 15 and 20 kopecks were minted of
nickel silver and later of copper-nickel alloy.

In 1926-1932, notes of the USSR State Bank with the value of 1, 2,
3 and 5 chervontsy were issued. Notes valued at 1, 3 and 5 rubles
were printed in 1928-1934.

2 USSR chervontsy of 1928

In 1937, a new series of bank notes with the value of 1, 3, 5 and 10
chervontsy was printed, followed by 1, 3 and 5 rubles issuance in 1938.

1 ruble bank note of 1938

In 1947, to improve the currency circulation and get rid of money
surplus a reform was implemented in form of denomination with
confiscation. However, many regard this reform as confiscation only,
because the prices, salaries and other payments remained unchanged. 10
old rubles were exchanged for 1 new ruble during one week.

Simultaneously, notes of the USSR State Bank with the value of 1, 3,
5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 rubles were put into circulation.

1 ruble bank note of 1947

In 1961, another currency reform was carried out with the aim to change
the standard of price. The Central Committee of the Communist Party
described the reform as the “most humane in history.” By early February
1961, about 90% of cash was exchanged for new bank notes. The prices
went down, but at the same time 1, 2, 3 kopecks were not devaluated
and their value increased by 10 times.

After the reform of 1961, coins with the value of 1, 2, 3, 5, 10,
15, 20, 50 kopecks and 1 ruble, as well as 1, 3, 5, 10, 25, 50 and
100-ruble bank notes were put into circulation.

1 ruble bank note of 1961

In 1991, another money reform was implemented under Finance Minister
Valentin Pavlov. During 3 days, citizens had to change up to 1000
rubles in 50- and 100-ruble bank notes for new ones. Just two weeks
before the reform, Pavlov made a statement saying that no changes
in the finance system are expected. According to the authorities,
this measure was meant to freeze fraudulent gains – the income of
profiteers, corruptionists and shadow business, thus stopping the
inflation. Simultaneously, deposits of the Savings Bank were frozen
and on April 1 prices went up throughout the USSR. At that time,
new bank notes with the value of 1, 3, 5, 10, 50, 100, 200, 500 and
1000 were put into circulation.

100 ruble bank note of 1991

In 1992, new bank notes with the value of 50, 200, 500, 1000, 5000
and 10000 rubles were printed to be circulated along with those issued
in 1961 and 1991.

1000 ruble bank note of 1992

Till November 22, 1993, when the Armenian national currency was issued,
the republic used the USSR currency.

The material was prepared in cooperation with Gevorg Mughalyan,
the numismatist of the Central Bank of Armenia.

Viktoria Araratyan / PanARMENIAN.Net, Varo Rafayelyan / PanARMENIAN
Photo

http://www.panarmenian.net/eng/details/172236/

The Armenian Apostolic Church Is Held Hostage

THE ARMENIAN APOSTOLIC CHURCH IS HELD HOSTAGE

The continuing culture of corruption and abuse of power at the
Catholicosate level of the Armenian church becomes more than evident
when we consider the impact the resignation letter of the Primate of
France, His Eminence Archbishop Norvan Zakarian, has been having on
the psyche of the current and future generations of the clergy.

Let us begin our analysis of the present state of affairs of the
Armenian Church by introducing Archbishop Norvan Zakarian, in order
to provide a context for understanding the unjust victimization and
severity of penal threats levied by Catholicos Karekin II against
this devoted and humble servant of God.

Archbishop Norvan Zakarian was born in Beirut, Lebanon, in 1940. After
graduating from the local parochial elementary school, he attended
the seminary of the Armenian Catholicosate of Cilicia. Thereafter,
he pursued his higher education at the St. James’ Brotherhood Seminary
in Jerusalem. In 1967, he went to France to continue his theological
studies. Archbishop Serovpe Manoukian, the former Primate of France,
recognized the exceptional character of this young seminarian and
ordained him as celibate priest in 1968.

In appreciation of his many years of service in the Church, His
Holiness Catholicos Vazken I ordained him a bishop in 1982. Bishop
Zakarian has had a long and distinguished track record of selfless
and obedient service to his parish and church. Moreover, he played
an instrumental role in creating and establishing the Armenian
Church Diocese of France. He was the force behind the movement that
transformed that dream into reality.

In 2007, by a majority of the votes of the Diocesan Assembly he was
elected as the first Primate of the newly-created Diocese of France,
followed by his nomination as a member of the Supreme Spiritual Council
of the Holy See of Etchmiadzin and appointment as Pontifical Legate
to the Armenian communities of Western Europe.

Those who have come to know Archbishop Zakarian have consistently
regarded him as a model clergyman, always willing and able to
serve the needs of his parishioners, who possesses the intellectual
integrity of the highest caliber-predicating any number of important
achievements. This is truly a dedicated man of the cloth, who has
become the pride of the Church and has won the hearts and minds of
the faithful.

Archbishop Norvan Zakarian is currently being targeted for
ostracization and vilified by vengeful wrath and subsequent shunning
by the Catholicos for not supporting the priest Vatche Hairabedian,
a known convicted criminal. Archbishop Zakarian summarizes his
disappointment at Karekin II’s behavior and verbal invectives in
his letter, stating, “For a while now, I have come to realize that
insulting me and hurting my feelings somehow gives you pleasure. Your
accusations addressed to me, indeed, surprise me. You probably do
not realize you are squashing the moral integrity of a human being
beneath your feet.”

The phrase, “for a while now” leads one to believe that this volley
of threats is not singular in nature, but just the latest attempt
to humiliate and defrock him by a disgruntled and vindictive head of
the church. In fact, the Archbishop iterates in his four-page letter
addressed to the members of the Supreme Spiritual Council many other
instances of his public chastisement by the Catholicos. We must ask
ourselves if this is the just and proper show of appreciation for
his 45 years of dutiful service to the Church and nation. Granted,
as Christians we can only expect recognition for our good deeds from
the Almighty. However, is it not only reasonable to expect not to be
persecuted and undermined for such deeds? How can such indefensible
behavior by the highest authority of the Church be justified and what
message does it send to the new, aspiring generation of seminarians
vowed to serve the Church?

A specific incident in a public location, disclosed by Archbishop
Norvan Zakarian, attests to the extent of the injury inflicted on him
by His Holiness Karekin II, who, upon visiting the Diocese in France,
launched into a tirade, declaring, “I will take away your hood…I will
take away your cloak…I will make you stand before your parishioners
and have them witness your punishment. You will not be able to perform
conduct any ceremonies such as baptisms, matrimony or funeral.”

Archbishop Zakarian has expressed his frustrations with the leadership
of the Church by reiterating that the Armenian Church has long stood
for love, grace, and compassion, whereas the current powers have
instilled a culture of fear and intimidation.

Indeed, this is a very sad state of affairs, but these revelations are
nothing new. Other high and low ranking priests have been targeted
as well, yet the turmoil and abuse of power continues. His Holiness
Aram I, of the Catholicosate of Cilicia, suffers from the same
megalomaniacal psychopathy, who has declared on several occasions to
his young priests, “…anyone who does not listen and obey my orders,
I will smash him and cast aside like a dirty rag and will humiliate
him, and will make him suffer”. Young priests, the world over, are
attesting to this kind of humiliation today. How is it feasible to
attract young people to come and serve the Church under such dreadful
conditions? Indeed, it is not!

Let us make it clear: our concerns are not so much with particular
individuals, –although the actions of the current leadership is
at best deplorable,– but with the lack of brotherly love among all
priests and absence of the manifestations of love that was taught to
us by Jesus Christ. Concomitantly, we should be distressed by the
lawlessness within the hierarchy of Church because at the heart of
the matter is a representative institution, for, of, and by the people.

Where there is no law, there is infamy and the law of jungle, and
hence one loses the ability to listen to public opinion and the
ability to conquer conflict or bridge differences, especially among
ensuing generations, who are now privy to the turmoil in and moral
turpitude of the Church.

The Church can once again become a beacon of moral and constructive
behavior, but only when the ranks of the concerned faithful servants
of God abide by His Word and begin acting accordingly. Alas, I am not
referring the cowards or those who have sold their souls to please
the authorities and gain temporal, worldly awards and decorations.

Adding insult to injury, non-elected members of the Supreme Spiritual
Council of Etchmiadzin have rendered decisions which exemplify their
obsequious nature and servile obedience to the morally bankrupt
authority of the Church.

His Holiness Karekin II, in his letter to Archbishop Zakarian, states,
” We were surprised to read your letter and the accusations that you
make. It is your duty to prove to the Supreme Spiritual Council in
session that your accusations are founded and that you have evidence to
prove your allegations”. At prima facie, it seems utterly ridiculous
to demand substantiation for something that occurred at a public
location and was witnessed by dozens of officials, but there we are
at an absurd point of having to prove that the rant of Catholicos
Karekin II at the Orly airport of Paris, France, actually took place.

Isn’t this latest demand a clear case of the abuse of power and rule
with impunity by the head of the Church?

Who among us is going to have the courage to stand up and declare the
truth? For, as the Bible says, “there is nothing hidden that shall
not be revealed” (Matt. 10:26).

VOSGAN MEKHITARIAN 10:11 05/11/2013 Story from Lragir.am News:

http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/society/view/31241