Armeconombank will learn when it will receive second syndicated loan

In late Sept 2008 Armeconombank will learn when it will receive the
second syndicated loan

2008-08-15 21:41:00

ArmInfo. In late Sept 2008 Armeconombank will learn when it will
receive the second syndicated loan, the vice chairman of the Board of
Armeconombank Hayk Lazarian has told ArmInfo.

Earlier the chairman of the Board of the bank David Sukiassyan said
that the size of the loan would range within $15mln-20mln.

To remind, in Dec 2007 Armeconombank signed an agreement with EBRD for
receiving a syndicated loan worth $15mln. The loan was provided by EBRD
and six big banks: Raiffeisen Zentralbank Osterreich AG and Bank
Austria Creditanstalt AG (Austria), State Bank of India, Land Bank of
Taiwan and FBN bank Limited (UK). EBRD lent $5mln for 36 months, the
other banks – $10mln ($5mln for 18 months, $5mln for 12 months – in
both cases the period of repayment can be prolonged). The money is to
be spent on support of small and medium-sized business.

UZBEKISTAN: Religious Freedom Survey, August 2008

UZBEKISTAN: RELIGIOUS FREEDOM SURVEY, AUGUST 2008

F18News
14 August 2008
Norway

By Mushfig Bayram, Forum 18 News Service <;,
and John Kinahan, Forum 18 News Service <;

In its survey analysis of religious freedom in Uzbekistan, Forum 18
News Service has found continuing violations by the state of freedom
of thought, conscience and belief. Amongst many serious violations –
which breach the country’s international human rights commitments –
non-state registered religious activity is a criminal offence, as
is the sharing of beliefs and meetings for religious purposes in
private homes. Religious communities are raided with impunity and
their members threatened, assaulted and even tortured. Prisoner of
conscience numbers are increasing. The state continues to actively
promote religious hatred and intolerance through the state-controlled
mass media. Members of religious communities complain that trials are
often conducted unfairly. Oppressive laws are symptomatic of oppressive
official attitudes, and state officials do not appear to acknowledge
any restraints on their actions. The state seeks to completely control
all religious activity – by Muslims and religious minorities such
as Christians, Baha’is, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Jews and Hare Krishna
devotees – through a web of laws, NSS secret police agents, censorship
and the activities of public agencies such as local administrations.

Ahead of the Universal Periodic Review of Uzbekistan by the United
Nations (UN) Human Rights Council in December 2008, Forum 18 News
Service has found a worsening of the country’s record on freedom of
thought, conscience and belief.

All non-state registered religious activity in Uzbekistan is a
criminal offence, as is the sharing of beliefs and meetings for
religious purposes in private homes. State officials frequently
violate international human rights standards on freedom of thought,
conscience and belief – which Uzbekistan has freely signed. Religious
communities are raided with impunity and their members threatened
and assaulted. Members of religious communities frequently complain
that trials are conducted unfairly, law seemingly being used merely
to provide officials with excuses to engage in oppression of fellow
citizens. Officials do not appear to see law as imposing restraints
on their actions.

President Islam Karimov has held absolute power since independence in
1991. Repression – including of religious believers of all faiths –
has escalated since the May 2005 Andijan [Andijon] massacre. Uzbekistan
has the largest population of any Central Asian state, estimated at
over 28 million, most of whom would identify themselves as Muslim by
tradition. Ethnic Uzbeks are often regarded in Central Asia as being
more devout Muslims than other Central Asian peoples. Uzbekistan’s
population is extremely poor, the minimum monthly salary decreed from
1 September 2008 by the President being 25,040 Soms (99 Norwegian
Kroner, 12 Euros, or 19 US Dollars).

State controls on religious believers and communities

Officials claim that Uzbekistan is a Muslim country, and so does
not oppress Muslims. Islam is primarily controlled from inside its
state-run structures, through the complete control of the selection,
education and nomination of imams in defiance of Article 61 of the
Uzbek Constitution: "Religious organisations and associations are
separate from the government and equal before the law. The government
does not interfere in the activities of religious associations." The
state also controls the number and location of mosques and the formal
religious education of Muslims. This has brought the Muslim clergy
almost completely under the control of the authorities, with the
Islamic religious leadership (the Spiritual Administration of Muslims
or Muftiate) being virtually an agency of state authority. In September
2007, the Muftiate banned imams in Namangan Region from preaching at
Ramadan night prayers, and children were banned from attending them.

The state controls other religious communities – including non-state
approved Muslims – from outside their formal structures, for example
through police and National Security Service (NSS) secret police
raids, or expulsions of university students (as happened with
Protestants and Hare Krishna devotees). Police and schoolteachers
have told children that if they attend Protestant churches they will
be jailed. All non-Russian Orthodox and non-state controlled Muslim
religious activity is banned in the north-west region of Karakalpakstan
[Qoraqalpoghiston].

State Islamic educational institutions check political loyalty
to the President, and the NSS secret police maintains informers
among students. Non-state controlled religious education is
forbidden. Official imams have complained that they cannot teach
religion to children.

The authorities from time to time use Sufism, particularly the
Naqshbandi order, to counter what they see as extremism and for
propaganda purposes in foreign countries. An example is allowing
an unregistered kanaka (Sufi monastery) in Kokand in the Fergana
[Farghona] Valley. However, the authorities’ attitude to Sufism
fluctuates, as the NSS secret police has regarded the Sufist "myurid"
(discipleship) system as a possible terrorist organisation.

Numbers of haj pilgrims are restricted to about 5,000, which is about
a fifth of the pilgrim quota granted by Saudi Arabia. All pilgrims
need approval from local authorities, the NSS secret police and the
Haj Commission, which is controlled by the state Religious Affairs
Committee and the Muftiate. Travel on the haj must be on the state-run
airline, Uzbekistan Airways, and costs about 200 times the minimum
monthly wage.

Religious communities – whether Muslim or of other faiths – are not
able to buy, build or open places of worship freely. Some places
of worship have been confiscated. Open and hidden surveillance
of religious believers and communities by the secret police is
widespread. The NSS has hidden microphones in places of worship,
sent agents to monitor worship, and recruited spies within
communities. State officials are acutely interested in controlling
all religious activity. An April 2007 internal document from Andijan
Region Hokimat (administration) reveals the issuing by the authorities
of direct orders to religious communities "to prevent missionary
activity," "to bring under constant close observation all officially
registered religious organisations" and "to strengthen the struggle
with people conducting illegal religious education and organising
small religious gatherings."

The official committee that runs each mahalla, the district into which
towns and cities are divided, is a key unit among state institutions
used in repression. Although ostensibly elected and self-governing,
mahalla committees are in practice instruments of state control. They
are often used to block registration attempts by religious minorities
such as Protestants and Jehovah’s Witnesses. They are also used in
periodic crackdowns on religious minorities, as well as to monitor
members of the majority Muslim community, such as to check up
on individuals who want to make the haj pilgrimage. Other public
agencies, such as the Fire Brigade and Sanitary-Epidemiological
Service, have also been used against religious believers, through
inspections allegedly to check whether registered communities are
observing fire and public health regulations.

To gain state registration, the only method of gaining legal status,
religious organisations must submit two letters of guarantee: one
from the district hokimat (local administration), confirming that
the organisation to be registered has a building which corresponds
to public health and fire safety requirements; and one from the
mahalla committee, stating that other mahalla residents do not
object to the organisation. Uzbek officials wrongly claim that the
alleged unwillingness of local residents allows the state to, under
international law, stop religious organisations from operating. All
unregistered religious activity is a criminal offence.

Other ways used to repress religious believers and communities, and
cut them off from their fellow-believers abroad, include refusals to
renew visas – used in summer 2008 against Uzbekistan’s Chief Rabbi –
and expulsions, which have been used against several Protestants. Even
those who flee from religious persecution in the country, such as
a Pentecostal who gained UN High Commissioner for Refugees refugee
status in Kazakhstan, face Uzbek government attempts to have them
sent back for trial – in this case with the false claim that he was
an Islamic fundamentalist and terrorist.

Torture

The UN Committee Against Torture found in November 2007 that the use
of torture by state officials is "routine." Religious believers and
communities are highly reluctant, for fear of further state repression,
to publicly discuss the use of torture. But occasionally on the record,
and frequently off the record, Forum 18 is told of the threat or
use of physical violence, including rape and the use of gasmasks to
cut off victims’ air supply. Such methods are used to try to force
adults and children to renounce their beliefs or to make confessions
implicating themselves or others. Such torture and threats usually
follow in the immediate aftermath of the frequent police and secret
police raids against unregistered religious communities, often but
not always while people are held under arrest.

Religious tolerance?

Officials claim that religious tolerance flourishes in the country,
however state-run TV has repeatedly shown films – which school and
university students are strongly encouraged to watch – inciting
intolerance and hatred of religious minorities, especially those who
are said to share their beliefs with others. For example, as well as
direct attacks on named individuals and communities, psychotropic or
mind-altering drugs are falsely said to be used by religious minorities
to gain adherents, those who change beliefs are said to be traitors,
and sharing beliefs has been compared with terrorism. Representatives
of registered religious communities have been shown supporting these
broadcasts, however it should be noted both that Uzbek TV has in the
past falsified interviews discussing human rights with people who
are not state officials, and that extreme pressure can be used by
the state against individuals and communities.

After one broadcast encouraging religious hatred in May 2008, Forum 18
was told that some members of religious minorities are "afraid to go
out on the street where they live for fear of being persecuted." Other
state-run media outlets, such as newspapers and websites, similarly
encourage religious intolerance and hatred. One Protestant publicly
attacked in a state TV broadcast commented to Forum 18 that "the
government is trying to stir up Muslims against Christians." Raids
on and fines imposed against members of religious minorities usually
accompany such media campaigns, but as such violations of religious
freedom are commonplace, it is unclear whether there is a direct link.

Legal framework a symptom of official attitudes

When the harsh 1998 Religion Law was adopted, President Karimov claimed
it was necessary to counter "Wahhabi" Muslims – a term widely and
loosely used in Central Asia to denote anyone from peaceful devout
Muslims to Islamist militants. Karimov stated in a speech broadcast
nationwide on state radio on 1 May 1998 that "such people must be
shot in the forehead. If necessary, I’ll shoot them myself." There are
indications that Uzbekistan may be planning to further harshen the Law.

Numerous articles in the Religion Law, Criminal Code and Administrative
Code are used to punish peaceful religious activity. The articles
most frequently used are cited below, but other articles are also
deployed. The Uzbek legal system contains a web of articles, used to
varying degrees over time, designed to block the peaceful exercise
of freedom of thought, conscience and belief. President Karimov’s
remarks illustrate clearly that the major problems that religious
believers and communities face are not limited to particular laws or
articles, but rather to the oppressive actions of state officials,
of which the laws are a prominent symptom.

Unregistered religious activity is a criminal offence under Article 8
of the Religion Law. Registration – the only way in which communities
may obtain legal status – is via the Justice Ministry. However,
the experience of many communities, registered or unregistered, is
that repression can occur at any time, with no regard for whether
or not a community is registered. The ban on unregistered religious
activity is underpinned by articles in the Criminal Code and the
Administrative Code. Under Article 240 (breaking the Religion Law)
of the Administrative Code, unlawful religious activity is punishable
by fines, or administrative detention of up to 15 days.

Statistics from the state Religious Affairs Committee indicate that a
net total of six Christian churches lost registration between October
2002 and February 2007, along with one Jehovah’s Witness, one Hare
Krishna and one Baha’i community. The figures cannot be independently
verified and conceal denominational differences, with an increase in
the numbers of Russian Orthodox and Armenian Apostolic communities
disguising the loss of legal status of Protestant churches. Religious
believers inside Uzbekistan indicate that the reality may be much
worse. Between 2000 and 2006, some Protestants calculated that 38 of
their congregations were stripped of legal status by the state. Over
100 religious communities of various faiths reportedly have tried
unsuccessfully to gain registration. The Religious Affairs Committee
asserted in February 2007 that "there are no restrictions on or
hindrances to registration." But when Jehovah’s Witnesses in the town
of Kagan, on the outskirts of Bukhara [Bukhoro], tried to register
between 2006 and 2008, they faced harassment, a police raid and the
ten community members were threatened with death and each given fines
of five years’ minimum wages. Bailiffs have made repeated visits to
seize property to pay the fines.

In 2006, fines for a wide range of religious activity – including
unregistered religious activity – were increased significantly,
rising from the previous 5 to 10 times the minimum monthly wage to the
current 50 to 100 times the minimum monthly wage. Since late 2007,
it appears that the numbers and scale of raids and fines imposed
on religious minorities have further increased. A March 2008 raid
on a Protestant church was justified as "anti-terrorist activity,"
although police were unable to specify to Forum 18 what threat the
raid was supposed to stop.

Although members of religious minorities are often fined, they have
in the past not been – unlike Muslims – frequently brought to trial
and jailed. An exception was the 2007 conviction of Pentecostal
Pastor Dmitry Shestakov. He was sentenced to four years in a labour
camp under Article 216 of the Criminal Code and Article 244-1, which
punishes "dissemination of information and materials containing ideas
of religious extremism, separatism, and fundamentalism, calls for
pogroms or violent eviction of individuals, or aimed at creating panic
among the population, as well as the use of religion in purposes of
breach of civil concord, dissemination of calumnious and destabilising
fabrications, and committing other acts aimed against the established
rules of conduct in society and of public security." Credible claims
were made that the trial breached the procedures laid down under Uzbek
law. It was suggested that the main reason for Pastor Shestakov’s
labour camp sentence was that his church – which subsequently decided
to disband as it was "too dangerous to meet" – had been attracting
ethnic Uzbek converts in the Fergana Valley. This valley is seen as
a region with many particularly devout Muslims, and was the site of
the 2005 Andijan massacre.

Sharing beliefs is banned by Article 216-2 of the Criminal
Code, which states that the "conversion of believers belonging
to a certain religion to other religions (proselytism) and other
missionary activities, will, after the application of penalties under
Administrative Law for similar activities, be punished by a fine
of between 50 and 100 times the minimum wage or up to six months’
detention or up to three years in prison." Similarly, Article 5 of
the Religion Law states that: "Actions aimed at turning believers
from one faith to another (proselytism) are forbidden, as is any
other form of missionary activity."

Article 216-2 of the Criminal Code also bans "illegal religious
activity, evasion of registration of a religious organisation’s
charter by its leaders, conducting special meetings for young people,
work groups, and other circles and groups, unrelated to worship,
by religious leaders and members of religious organisations."

"Inducement to participate in the operation of illegal public
associations, religious organisations, movements or sects" is banned
under Article 216-1 of the Criminal Code.

Reinforcing the bans on sharing beliefs and on religious small groups,
"teaching religious beliefs without specialised religious education and
without permission from the central organ of a [registered] religious
organisation, as well as teaching religious beliefs privately"
is banned by the Criminal Code’s Article 229-2 and Article 241 of
the Administrative Code. Article 10 of the Religion Law states
that "religious educational establishments acquire the right to
operate after registering with the Justice Ministry and receiving
the appropriate licence. (..) Persons teaching religious subjects at
religious educational establishments must have a religious education
and carry out their work with the permission of the appropriate agency
of the central administration."

Unregistered Muslim religious activity has mainly been punished under
Criminal Code Articles 159 "attempts to change the constitutional
order"; 242 "organisation of a criminal society" and Article 156. This
article bans "acts intended to humiliate ethnic honour and dignity,
insult the religious or atheistic feelings of individuals, carried
out with the purpose of inciting hatred, intolerance, or divisions
on a national, ethnic, racial, or religious basis, as well as the
explicit or implicit limitation of rights or preferences on the basis
of national, racial, or ethnic origin, or religious beliefs." This
article has also been used against religious minorities.

Religious minorities within Uzbekistan have noted that the state’s
own incitement of religious intolerance and hatred violates the
Criminal Code’s Article 156, as well as both Article 139 punishing
"Denigration, that is, dissemination of false, defamatory information"
(including in the media) and Article 140 punishing "Insult, that is,
intentional grievous degrading of the honour and dignity of a person"
(also including in the media).

Prisoners of conscience

Reportedly, thousands of Muslims have been imprisoned, usually
on accusations of belonging to terrorist, extremist or banned
organisations. One observer asserted that within the past year police
have arrested people as terrorists because an Arabic Koran was found
in their house. The nature of the Uzbek justice system, in which the
planting of evidence and torture by the authorities is often credibly
claimed, makes it unlikely that the authorities – or anyone else –
knows how many of these prisoners are guilty of violence or are only
"guilty" of being devout Muslims who take their faith seriously.

Prisoners are often denied their religious freedom. Muslim prisoners
have complained to Forum 18 that they have been forbidden to recite
prayers or fast during Ramadan. Similarly, Pentecostal pastor Shestakov
has been denied access to a Bible in prison.

There are violent groups which oppose the state, even though their
violence is infrequent, but the authorities’ own violence and
injustice fuels support for such groups. When Forum 18 has asked
Uzbeks who sympathise with extremist organisations why they do so,
they often indicate that such sympathy is motivated by a dislike of
the government’s actions.

In addition to Pastor Shestakov, the other currently known religious
minority prisoners of conscience are four Jehovah’s Witnesses:
Irfon Khamidov, who is serving a two-year prison sentence imposed
in May 2007 for "illegal religious teaching"; Olim Turaev, who was
jailed for four years in a labour camp from April 2008 for holding
an unapproved religious meeting and teaching religion without state
permission; Abdubannob Ahmedov sentenced in July 2008 to a four year
term for "illegal organisation of public associations or religious
organisations"; and Sergei Ivanov sentenced in July 2008 to three
and a half years for "illegal organisation of public associations
or religious organisations". Other Jehovah’s Witnesses are serving
suspended or corrective labour sentences, under which a large part
of their salaries is deducted and handed to the state.

The number of religious minority prisoners of conscience may continue
to increase, as the authorities seem to be more frequently bringing
charges that carry a possible jail sentence. Aimurat Khayburahmanov,
a Protestant arrested in June 2008, faces criminal trial under
Article 229-2 and Article 244-2 part 1 (also used against unregistered
Muslims), which punishes "establishment, direction of or participation
in religious extremist, separatist, fundamentalist or other banned
organisations" with sentences of up to 15 years’ imprisonment. As is
often the case, these charges can mask the activity the authorities
dislike. Asked what was "extremist" about Khayburahmanov’s activity,
Uzbek police told Forum 18 that he held meetings in his home and read
"prohibited" Christian literature. Police refused to specify what
Christian literature was prohibited, but stated that, for reading
these books, imprisonment was a legitimate punishment.

Control of religious literature

Religious literature in Uzbekistan is also under tight state
control. The import and production of literature – including the
Koran and the Bible – is strictly controlled, with compulsory
prior censorship by the state Religious Affairs Committee. Only
registered communities can ask for permission to print or import
material. Relatively little literature about the majority Islamic
faith is allowed to be published, and none is imported officially. Some
Islamic books are no longer published, such as Imam Muhammad ibn Ismail
al-Bukhari’s book "Sahih al-Bukhari". This is a collection of hadith
which Sunni Muslims regard as the most authentic hadith compilation.

Censorship of religious literature is mandated under Article 19 of
the Religion Law. This bans the "manufacture, storage and distribution
of printed items, films, photographs, audio and video recordings and
other materials containing ideas of religious extremism, separatism
and fundamentalism". The article also states that: "Delivery and
distribution of religious literature published abroad is done after
expert analysis of its contents is carried out in the order prescribed
by law." Publication of religious literature within Uzbekistan is
also subject to compulsory prior censorship. Under Criminal Code
Article 244-3, "illegal production, storage, import or distribution"
of religious publications is punishable for repeat offenders by terms
of up to three years in jail. Article 184-2 of the Administrative Code,
imposes fines and confiscation for a first offence.

Either the state’s Religious Affairs Committee or – in provincial
areas – teachers at local university philosophy departments decide
whether religious material, including items sent by post, should be
banned. Mainstream Islamic theological works are often deemed to be
extremist. Uzbekistan’s postal authorities actively collaborate in
censorship of publications sent from abroad, and have all but halted
the delivery of parcels of books sent to individuals from abroad. Such
parcels have been returned to senders in recent years with a letter
informing them that such literature is banned and telling them not to
send it in future. Religious minorities – including Christians and
Jehovah’s Witnesses – are also concerned about literature held for
long periods by customs, which may also incur extremely expensive
official charges for "storage". The official system of internet
censorship also blocks access to some foreign religious websites.

In 2006, new penalties were introduced for the "illegal" production,
storage, import and distribution of religious literature. Some
Muslims stressed to Forum 18 that the changes merely provided a
"legal" basis for current practice. The state Religious Affairs
Committee told Forum 18 that "illegal" production and distribution
of religious literature are "home-produced" materials.

Frequently even legally imported materials are confiscated during
police raids. Courts often order such material – including books such
as the Bible – to be burnt, as happened to literature confiscated
from Baptists in Karshi [Qarshi] in October 2006.

Ban on religious dress

Under Article 14 of the Religion Law, wearing religious clothing is not
allowed in public places. The term "religious clothing" is not defined,
and this has caused Muslim men to fear having an obviously Muslim
appearance, such as wearing a beard and clothes that are traditional
to Muslim countries. Women who wear traditional robes covering their
heads have also been subjected to discrimination in the past, but
this ban does not appear to be currently applied rigorously. From
time to time, the authorities in the Fergana Valley have also stopped
men from wearing traditional white prayer caps entering mosques, but
this does not appear to be a current problem. The ban on appearing
in public in "religious clothing" also affects religious minorities
who wear religious clothing, such as Hare Krishna devotees.

What changes do Uzbek citizens want in religious policy?

Religious believers of various faiths have told Forum 18 that they
most want to see Uzbekistan:

– end the ban on unregistered religious activity;

– end the ban on sharing beliefs;

– end the ban on religious meetings in private homes;

– end raids on peaceful religious worship services;

– end threats, violence and torture by state officials;

– enable fair trials for alleged offences;

– end fines, harassment and persecution of people exercising their
right to freedom of thought, conscience and belief;

– free prisoners of conscience;

– end attempts to control and repress both Muslims and members of
religious minorities;

– end state encouragement of religious hatred and intolerance;

– end censorship of imported and locally-produced religious literature
and material;

– end confiscations of property from religious believers and
communities;

– end restrictions on haj pilgrims, and other religious believers
and communities being in contact with fellow-believers abroad;

– and end restrictions on children’s religious education.

Uzbek citizens have told Forum 18 that these steps are essential to
ending the state’s ongoing, systematic and nationwide violations of
freedom of thought, conscience and belief. (END)

For a personal commentary by a Muslim scholar, advocating
religious freedom for all faiths as the best antidote
to Islamic religious extremism in Uzbekistan, see
338.

Full reports on freedom of thought, conscience
and belief in Uzbekistan can be found at
;r eligion=all&country=33.

The previous Forum 18 Uzbekistan religious freedom survey can be
found at

A survey of the religious freedom decline in the eastern part of
the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE)
area is at ,
and of religious intolerance in Central Asia is at
15.

A printer-friendly map of Uzbekistan is available at
las/index.html?Parent=asia&Rootmap=uzbeki.

http://www.forum18.org&gt
http://www.forum18.org&gt
http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=
http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?query=&amp
http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=777.
http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=806
http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=8
http://www.nationalgeographic.com/xpeditions/at

Armenia Has No Intention To Quit CIS: Foreign Ministry

ARMENIA HAS NO INTENTION TO QUIT CIS: FOREIGN MINISTRY

ARKA
Aug 13, 2008

YEREVAN, August 13. /ARKA/. Armenia has no intention to quit the CIS,
reported RA Deputy Foreign Minister Gegham Gharibjanyan. "The CIS
is Armenia’s long-term political choice, and the country has been
cooperating with the Commonwealth for the past years," he said.

The Deputy Minister pointed out that last year Armenia signed a
concept of further cooperation with the CIS.

Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili declared Tuesday Georgia would
leave the CIS.

Ankara: Georgia Loses While Battleground Expands

GEORGIA LOSES WHILE BATTLEGROUND EXPANDS
By Sä°Nan Oä~^An*

Today’s Zaman
Aug 12, 2008
Turkey

The operation initiated by Georgia in an effort to preserve its
territorial integrity and maintain constitutional order took on another
dimension with the involvement of Russia; there is now the danger that
the war may spread all over the region. Meanwhile, Abkhazia attacked
Georgian units stationed in the Kodor Valley, which Georgian forces
have occupied since 2006. With South Ossetia’s official call for
Russian help, the war to maintain constitutional order has turned
into a South Ossetia-Abkhazia-Russia war against Georgia.

Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili issued a document indicating
that the country is in a state of war and referred it to parliament
for approval; parliament endorsed the document. The Russian General
Staff insisted that this is not a state of war, stressing that Russian
actions sought only to protect Russian citizens in the region. Georgia
asked for a cease-fire despite that the fact that it had declared
war against Russia.

Perhaps the date of Aug. 8 was chosen for a reason, as at the time
the international community was busy watching the inauguration of
the Summer Olympics in Beijing. Putin and many other word leaders
were in that city.

The first promise Saakashvili made to the Georgian people after the
Rose Revolution in 2003 was to preserve the country’s territorial
integrity. Georgia had three autonomous regions when it declared
independence from Russia. Two — Abkhazia and Ossetia — gained
independence. Only Ajaria was out of the conflict. Turkey’s role was
indispensable in this, as it actually acted as a guarantor in regards
to Ajaria. But Turkey never brought that up.

Saakashvili decided to start with the weakest of the three,
Ajaria. After sending Ajarian President Aslan Abatidze to Moscow, he
annulled the autonomous status of the region. The people of Ajaria,
a predominantly Muslim region that had been included in the borders
at the time of the Turkish National Oath (Misak-ı Milli during the
Ottoman era), were forced to convert to Christianity. A cross was
included on the Ajarian flag.

Next Saakashvili targeted South Ossetia, the second-weakest of the
three regions. But Russia did not let this happen.

In effect, Russia has had a pretext for this war for some time, as
most citizens of South Ossetia have become Russian citizens. Moreover,
Russia has stationed peacekeeping troops in the region. Russia has
also imposed an embargo upon Georgia. Therefore, Russia is trying
to take the Georgians out of South Ossetia in order to protect its
citizens and troops and to destroy Georgia’s infrastructure and
industrial capabilities.

The involvement of Russia in the conflict has forced Saakashvili to
ask for a cease-fire. This situation shows that Georgia will be the
losing party in the conflict. If the current scenario continues this
way, South Ossetia and Abkhazia will break away from Georgia. There
will be no peaceful means to ensure that these republics will remain
attached to Georgia.

It is necessary to review the developments, which have taken on a
regional dimension and now include Russia and Abkhazia, despite the
fact that the conflict started between Georgia and South Ossetia.

US, NATO and the EU:

The US, the EU and NATO have stressed that they support the territorial
integrity of Georgia. While some countries such as Denmark have made
strong statements against Russia, no concrete step has been taken
by the EU or the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe
(OSCE). It should be noted that Russia’s ability to threaten Europe’s
energy security as well as its military and diplomatic strength has
played a determinative role in Europe’s ineptness.

It does not seem logical to think that Georgia initiated the South
Ossetia operation without informing the West — NATO, the US,
etc. It is also impossible to argue that Georgia did not consider
probable Russian involvement after initiation of the operation. So
why did Georgia take this action knowing that it would lead to
confrontation with Russia? It is not logical that Georgia did not
consider this. Only one option remains: Georgia started this war
knowing that a confrontation with Russia would occur. In so doing,
it might have sought to drag Russia into a regional conflict.

What are the strategic considerations of Russia in this
operation? These could include the following:

–Russia will be dragged into an ethnic conflict in the region to make
sure that it is labeled by the international community as an aggressor.

— Georgia will seek help from the US and NATO when it requires a
hand because it is aware that it cannot deal with Russia on its own.

–Georgia’s membership in NATO will be facilitated

–The Olympics, held in China, — the US’s biggest rival — will lose
importance because of the Russian-Georgian conflict.

–Attention will be taken away from the American elections

–Probably Israel and the US will strike Iran at a time when Russia
is busy with this regional conflict.

The list may be expanded. But there is one vague point: To what extent
will the US be supportive of Georgia? Statements from US authorities
have so far been mild at best, asking for immediate Russian withdrawal
and maintenance of Georgian territorial integrity. A harsher US stance
will be important for a better understanding of potential scenarios
in the region. On the other hand, Saakashvili called for a cease-fire
when he realized that the help he was expecting would never arrive.

The ongoing conflict between Russia and Georgia will also have
repercussions in the region, causing separations and partitions. Maybe
the potential for this has existed for a long time, but the lines were
never drawn so clearly. Now the current statements made by different
countries clearly distinguish the sides and parties in the region.

This war clarified the lines among the countries in the region
and distinguished one from the other. Azerbaijan, neighbor to
both Georgia and the Russian Federation, issued a statement that
it supported Georgian territorial integrity, implying that it was
extending diplomatic support to Georgia in relation to the South
Ossetian problem.

Azeri support for Georgia is understandable. Azerbaijan, which
sympathizes with Georgia because of the Armenian occupation of
Nagorno-Karabakh, supports Georgian territorial integrity. It
is expected that Azerbaijan will resort to violence to regain the
Nagorno-Karabakh region if this is not done via peaceful means in the
middle term. Azeri President İlham Aliyev and the defense minister
made clear statements reaffirming this stance.

While Azerbaijan supports Georgia in the conflict, Armenia openly
supports Russia and even became party to the clash. It is rumored that
when Russian military jets bombed Georgian military bases in Vaziani
and Marnauil near Tbilisi, which are unofficially used by the US and
NATO, the jets had taken off from Armenia. This proves that Armenia
has joined the war on the side of Russia. Kazakhstan also tends to
support Russia in the conflict.

Within the region, Ukraine, Poland and the Baltic countries have
taken Georgia’s side. Ukraine, which has ongoing problems with Russia,
declared that it would extend any kind of support with the exception
of weaponry to Georgia. Poland took action to ensure that the EU and
NATO take steps toward a decision to defend Georgia against Russian
aggression. In general the countries that have problems with Russia
in the region have taken a supportive stance toward Georgia in the
conflict.

Turkey is one of the most sensitive countries involved in this
conflict. Turkey has made clear that it does not support separatist
movements because of similar problems that Azerbaijan has been
facing. For this reason, it supports the territorial integrity of
states with separatist problems. However, it also has refrained
from moves that will harm its sensitive relations with Russia. It
is well-known that Turkey equips Georgian military units, provides
technical support for the Georgian army and even repaired a military
airport in that country. In general, Turkey extends military support
to Georgia. The Russian press has emphasized that Turkey is at the
top of the list of countries extending support to Georgia.

Another reason Turkey is concerned is that Georgia is a transit
country for Turkey. The country hosts important pipelines and
transport corridors. The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) pipeline, the
Shah Deniz-Erzurum gas pipeline and the Kars-Tbilisi-Baku (KTB)
railway project are all factors that increase Turkey’s concerns.

There are many sides behind this war. We cannot take the issue
as a mere Georgian-South Ossetian war. Russia is at the heart of
the conflict. Turkey supports Georgia because of their strategic
ties. Moreover, Turkey favors Georgia’s territorial integrity in
principle because Azerbaijan is dealing with a similar problem in
Karabakh. On the other hand, the northern Caucasian peoples support
South Ossetia. There is a sizeable Caucasian diaspora in Turkey
that generally supports South Ossetia. Moreover, Turkey has deepened
its strategic relations with Russia. In this case, Turkey cannot be
expected to take sides with either party.

Turkey may assume a role of mediation in this conflict as it has in
Middle Eastern conflicts because the involvement of Russia and the
voluntary support of the Caucasian peoples will make the situation
more difficult for Georgia. Georgia asked for Turkey’s support when
Russia became involved in the war and started bombing peaceful areas
outside the war zone. What can Turkey do at this point? The situation
is sensitive. Therefore, Turkey should assume the role of mediator to
ensure that the issue is discussed in UN circles and that peace is
maintained. And of course, Turkey should consider the humanitarian
aspect of the conflict and provide relief aid for people in the
conflict zone.

Is there any possibility that the energy and communication lines
will be harmed by the war? According to the Energy Ministry, the
answer is no. However, arguing that the BTC will not be bombed while
other locations within Georgian borders are being bombed — such as
the Port of Poti, the Vaziani military base and the unofficial US
military base in Marnauli, a predominantly Azeri region — must be an
attempt to calm the public. Otherwise, there is no other explanation
for this. On the other hand, it should be recalled that these lines
pass through a predominantly Armenian region, and in consideration
of this, some lines may be harmed.

*Sinan Ogan is the president of the Turkish Center for International
and Strategic Analysis (TURKSAM).

–Boundary_(ID_LJE6m5S+StdYhrDS1GDVPQ) —

Iran Ready to Defuse Georgia Conflict

Alalam News Network, Iran
Aug 10 2008

Iran Ready to Defuse Georgia Conflict

TEHRAN, Aug 10–Iran says it is ready to offer any help to end the
mounting crisis in the breakaway Georgian region of South Ossetia.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Hassan Ghashghavi told reporters on
Saturday that the the Islamic republic voices concern over the
military conflicts in South Ossetia that have left hundreds of
defenseless people dead and calls for an immediate halt to the
clashes.

The spokesman also said "Iran is ready to offer any help … under its
principal policies of contributing to the establishment of peace and
stability in the region."

Georgian military forces began a large-scale military offensive
against South Ossetian separatists on Thursday evening in order to
regain control of the province, which declared independence after the
collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.

Russia deployed its peacekeeping troops to South Ossetia following
Georgia’s military offensive against the breakaway region.

Urging the two sides to reach a negotiated solution on the disputed
region, Ghashghavi warned that the deterioration of conditions could
spill over the entire region which would leave "negative impacts".

Iran borders with two of Georgia’s neighbors in the Caucasus —
Armenia and Azerbaijan — and historically maintains a close
geopolitical interest in the region.

Russian diners say Nyet to Soviet service

Times of Malta, Malta
Sunday, 10th August 2008

Russian diners say Nyet to Soviet service
James Kilner, Reuters

A frothy cappuccino or fresh mozzarella salad is no longer
enough. Russia’s growing middle classes now want service with a smile.

With much of Europe and North America saturated, the newly affluent
among Russia’s 143 million people are an attractive target for Western
coffee shop chains eager for growth, and Starbucks and Costa Coffee
are among brands now found in Moscow.

But where once any alternative to Soviet-style fried meats and
dill-laced boiled vegetables was a thrill, increased competition now
means superior service is important to attract and retain customers.

This is a challenge, says Ian Zilberkweit, an American part-owner of
the Russian franchise for the Belgian coffee shop chain Le Pain
Quotidien.

He and his Armenian-American business partner have drawn up bonus
schemes and share plans to persuade staff to shake off Soviet habits
and instil loyalty in a typically casual sector.

"The Soviet system meant there was no system for treating people
nicely," said Zilberkweit, who has just opened his fifth store. "It
was all about shifting products."

Cash from energy and commodity exports has boosted Russia’s economy
since a crisis in 1998. The World Bank estimates real incomes rose by
80 per cent between 1998 and 2007 to nearly $8,000 per person –
roughly level with Mexico and Lithuania.

Data from Moscow-based Business Analytica shows the number of bars,
cafes and restaurants in Moscow rose by a third between 2004 and 2007
to 6,600, with the fastest growth at the mid-priced level. Big chains
now own around a third of the outlets in Moscow, double the proportion
in 2004.

Starbucks Corp., which is closing shops in North America, opened its
first branch in Moscow in 2007 with a Russian partner M. H. Alshaya
Company W.L.L and now has five, and Costa Coffee, owned by British
brewer Whitbread opened in March through a joint venture with Russia’s
Rosinter.

Starbucks declined to give details of its plans but Costa aims to open
at least 200 cafes in Russia, a market analysts described as a major
growth area.

"All companies are focusing on the Russian market in all leisure
sectors, not just coffee. It’s a country that Costa has to be in,"
said UBS analyst Stamatis Draziotis.

Le Pain Quotidien’s Zilberkweit said the potential in Russia was just
too great to miss out on.

"In Europe, real incomes are not going up due to rising prices, but in
Russia it’s different," he said, wearing a grey London Business School
sailing club shirt.

"Because the domestic economy is growing like crazy, incomes are still
going up like crazy."

By the end of this year, Le Pain Quotidien aims for eight outlets in
Moscow, rising to 50 within four years. Sales now stand at about $5
million but are targeted to rise to $20 million by 2009, said
Zilberkweit.

A former investment banker at HSBC bank, he said competing in Russia’s
lucrative dining market is further complicated for foreign firms
because spending patterns and business costs differ from those in the
West.

Le Pain Quotidien projects itself as part-bakery, part-cafe,
part-restaurant.

The interiors are wooden, a counter sells freshly baked bread and
pastries – supplied by a bakery which Zilberkweit part-owns – and the
menus are based mainly around soups, salads and light main meals.

But Russian customers spend their money differently from people in
other countries.

About 50 per cent of Le Pain Quotidien’s sales are from food in Russia
compared with 35 per cent in Britain, for example. Rent is by far the
biggest expense in Russia while staff salaries are the main expense in
Europe.

Its prices in Russia are similar to the rest of Europe – $3 for a
croissant, $7 for a bowl of soup and $17 for a fish pie – and diners
usually add on a tip of around 10 per cent.

With prices high and rising, Russian customers are no longer willing
to stomach slow, erratic and surly Soviet service.

"If I see a new place which I want to go into, I do worry what the
service will be like," said Natalya Miloserdova, 27, puffing on a
cigarette outside the tour agency where she works.

"You pick a place to eat where you know the service will be good."

Zilberkweit said service has been a neglected aspect of retail in
Russia as most staff grew up without experiencing any.

"We were unbelievably frustrated two years ago because we would get
these people in and we would just want them to smile and they wouldn’t
even know why," he said.

Smiling staff can make the difference in Russia’s increasingly crowded
cafe sector.

"The customer, five years ago, in Russia would have been only too
happy if within five minutes’ walk there was a place to have a coffee
latte," he said. "Now, he has 10 choices and demands much more."

Another Soviet hangover Zilberkweit has had to confront was a drop in
an employee’s work ethic after promotion.

"In Russia, the moment you give somebody a title they stop working,"
he said. "Now, we give people more money and more responsibility but
not a new title."

The security cameras on the ceiling also play a role. "We have to do
this for security reasons," he said, adding that pictures are beamed
to a control room in every restaurant.

Rep. Cohen Wins Racially Charged Tennessee Primary Battle

REP. COHEN WINS RACIALLY CHARGED TENNESSEE PRIMARY BATTLE
Kris Alingod

All Headline News
75362
Aug 8 2008

Nashville, TN (AHN) – Freshman Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN) won by a
landslide in Thursday’s Democratic primary election. Cohen won after
a highly contentious and racially charged battle with African-American
lawyer Nikki Tinker.

Unofficial results had Cohen leading 79-19 percent, proving that his
rival’s controversial TV ad linking him to the Ku Klux Klan had not
fooled voters.

Fliers asking, "Why do Steve Cohen and the Jews Hate Jesus?" written
by a controversial African-American minister who supported Tinker,
were distributed in Memphis during the race.

Cohen, who is Jewish, is favored to win the general election against
independent candidate Jake Ford. He is the first white U.S. congressman
in Tennessee to represent a predominantly black district. Cohen
recently sponsored a House bill "apologizing for the enslavement and
racial segregation of African-Americans." The bill passed last week.

Voters were apparently not bothered by reports that Cohen had assaulted
a filmmaker a day before the primary. The filmmaker, Peter Musurlian,
allegedly attempted to enter the lawmaker’s Memphis home. Cohen
says Musurlian has inaccurately reported his opposition to a House
bill condemning Turkey’s treatment of Armenia during World War II as
"genocide."

Tinker argued that an African-American should represent the district,
which has 60 percent black voters and only 35 percent whites. Her
campaign, however, earned the ire of even early supporters, including
EMILY’S List.

Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) had also repudiated the "incendiary attacks"
during the contest, and asked Democrats in the district to unite.

http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/70118

President Serzh Sargsyan Approves Suppliment To 2007 List Of Judges’

PRESIDENT SERZH SARGSYAN APPROVES SUPPLEMENT TO 2007 LIST OF JUDGES’ PROMOTION

ARMENPRESS
Aug 6, 2008

YEREVAN, AUGUST 6, ARMENPRESS: President Serzh Sargsyan received
today Sheikh Saud Bin Sakr al Kasimi, the Ras al Khaima emirate’s
successor to the throne and the United Arab Emirate’s (U.A.E.) deputy
prime minister, and members of his entourage.

The presidential press service quoted Serzh Sargsyan as saying that he
was pleased with dynamically developing relations between Armenia and
the UA.E., saying also various-level reciprocal visits and partnership
projects have become more frequent in recent years.

"Armenia has always been striving to have friendly relations with
the Arab world, including Gulf countries and this is a historical
strive," he said. The Armenian president described the achievements
of the U.A.E. in recent years as impressive.

Stressing that there is a big potential for both countries to boost
their relations, President Sargsyan emphasized its full use. He said
the fact that trade between the two countries doubled in the last
six months is the testament of more active contacts between their
business people.

Sheikh Saud Bin Sakr al Kasimi thanked for the support of Armenia
to U.A.E.’s companies operating in Armenia expressing hope that
this partnership will continue. He said his country seeks to create
an environment of prosperity, stability and economic growth and is
cooperating with those countries which pursue these same objectives.

The two men spoke also about joint programs in development of tourism,
mining and other industrial sectors. Sargsyan said foreign investments
in Armenia bring not only new jobs and experience but also a new
quality and new culture. He pledged his government’s support to
these projects.

BAKU: No Progress Reported In Moscow Talks On Garabagh

NO PROGRESS REPORTED IN MOSCOW TALKS ON GARABAGH

AzerNews Weekly
Aug 6 2008
Azerbaijan

Talks last week in Moscow between the Azerbaijani and Armenian foreign
ministers seeking to settle the Upper (Nagorno) Garabagh conflict
produced no tangible result despite proceeding constructively.

The Azerbaijani minister, Elmar Mammadyarov, told a news conference
after meeting his counterpart on Friday that their meeting had
been beneficial and both sides decided to continue holding peace
talks. Also, he did not rule out that a meeting of the two countries`
presidents might soon take place.

The Armenian minister, Eduard Nalbandian, said both countries had
agreed to continue negotiating, using the conflict resolution agenda
introduced by OSCE mediators.

He also said the next face-to-face meeting might be held on the
sidelines of the UN General Assembly session in late September.

"We sense, today, how important such meetings are. Our meeting before
the UN session is possible, as well," Nalbandian said.

Mammadyarov and Nalbandian first had a one-on-one meeting at the
Russian foreign minister`s residence, followed by broad discussions
during a meeting attended by the co-chairs of the mediating OSCE Minsk
Group (MG). The members of the Minsk Group had held discussions in
the Russian capital prior to Thursday`s meeting of foreign ministers.

Meanwhile, Novruz Mammadov, head of the Azerbaijan President`s Office
international relations department, called upon the MG co-chairs to
step up effort at finding a solution to the long-standing dispute.

Mammadov expressed disappointment that some of the demands put forward
by Baku were not met.

"The co-chairs either don`t understand us or simply don`t want to
do so," he told a local TV channel. "As diplomats or experts on
conflicts, we respect their work. But the co-chairs should justify
and assert themselves. It is useless just to pass time, come and go,
and prolong the matter."

Boxing: Metamorphosis Of Vic Darchinyan

METAMORPHOSIS OF VIC DARCHINYAN
Igor Frank

411mania.com
/boxing/81966/Metamorphosis-of-Vic-Darchinyan.htm
Aug 4 2008
TX

Darchinyan wins another title but not before making some changes.

As I woke up Sunday morning in Tacoma Washington, I was still thinking
about a brilliant performance that Vic " The Raging Bull" Darchinyan
put on yesterday at the Emerald Queen Casino by ravaging his opponent
Dimitri Kirilov and thus earning his IBF super flyweight title.

What a difference a year makes. Last year I saw Darchinyan twice:
once in April beating undersized and overmatched Victor Burgos, who
ended up seriously hurt and in the hospital in Carson, California,
throwing a haymaker after a haymaker and the second time in Bridgeport,
Connecticut when Vic was separated from his senses by a perfectly
placed left hook of "The Flash" Nonito Donaire in what many considered
to be an upset of the year. In both fights Vic looked like a crude
banger, who threw one punch at a time with singular purpose to knock
you out, not much technique, just stocking and banging. It worked
for most of his career, but in a fight with Donaire, Flash was able
to time him and counterpunch with a lot of success and deliver a one
punch knock out that fans are still talking about. It was a kind of
punch that not many can recover from; consider that plus a near fatal
conclusion to a Burgos fight, that obviously bothered Darchinyan for
a while and many thought that Vic was damaged goods. When I previewed
this contest between Kirilov and Darchinyan a week ago I called it
a classic match up of boxer versus puncher and was not really sure
about the outcome, but the way the fight unfolded was a complete
surprise to me.

The puncher, Darchinyan turned boxer, he was on fire from the onset:
he moved, threw a lot of jabs and straight left hands right down
the middle.

Supposedly , Kirilov had a lot of experience fighting southpaws,
but he seemed lost in the ring with Vic, who moved his right leg on
the outside of Dmitri’s left leg and was always in perfect position
to fire a straight left hand that was landing with hammer like power
and an alarming regularity.

Darchinyan looked like he had more balance and he actually moved to
avoid blows from his adversary and his punches looked different:
they were straight and on target. From the second round on Vic
continued to throw dynamic, fast and accurate combinations of jabs
crosses hooks and uppercuts mixed in with thunderous body punches
that reverberated outside the ring and made me wince. Vic actually
boxed like a true professional with a confidence of a champion. It
was the most impressive performance that I have ever seen from Vic
and the most dramatic change that I have seen in a fighter in a long
time. By the end of the third round I started to worry for the safety
of Kirilov in lieu of him catching a huge amount of hard shots from
Vic, so I was relived when Dimitri was counted out at the beginning
of the fifth stanza and the fight was over.

Darchinyan promised a thriller and a knock out and he delivered in
a spectacular fashion.

So, as I was going down to a hotel lobby to get my morning coffee I was
still thinking about a miraculous transformation of Vic Darchinyan and
what could have caused it when I ran into a man I saw in Vic’s corner
last night. His name is Vazgen Badalian and he was called in from
Armenia to help after Vic parted with his trainer Billy Hussein. I
congratulated Vazgen on a tremendous victory and asked him what he
thought. He told me that he knew and trained Vic in Armenia since he
was eight years old and if Vic concentrates on task at hand he can
produce performances like that every time.

Mr. Vazgen Badalian is a famous and well respected trainer who has
developed a lot of amateur stand outs in Armenia and was in charge of
the Olympic team of that country. Let’s not forget that Vic Darchinyan
had a stellar amateur career: 178 fights, bronze medal at European
Championship in Greece in 1998, bronze medal in Goodwill Games in New
York in 1998, gold medal in European Championship in Ukraine in 1999
and was a member of Armenian Olympic team in 2000. One does not get
that far without knowing how to box. May be, Vic had so much success
in knocking people out that he forgot how to do it for a while. Well,
that time is over. Mr. Badalian brought Vic back to basics and brought
discipline back to his camp and Darchinyan looks to be a complete
fighter that has all the tools to compete on the elite level and he
is going to need all of it and more to vie with guys he called out:
Christian Mijares, Fernando Montiel and Nonito Donaire. In the ring,
Vic looks like a scorpion , predator, ready to strike at any time,
but in this fight he started to remind me of bare knuckle fighters of
19th century, guys that fought wars and did not mind spilling blood
and did not call it a sport." I like my style," said Darchinyan in
his post fight interview:" I am open, but you can not touch me." And
that certainly was the case on Saturday night when Vic stormed back on
the scene of super hot and talented 115 pound division in a dramatic
fashion and got himself right in the middle of some very intriguing
match ups.

http://www.411mania.com/sports