Author: Anna Tamamian

ANKARA

Turkiye’s Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) lawmaker Yasar Karadag on Monday called for the closure of the Metsamor nuclear power plant in neighboring Armenia.

“The Metsamor Nuclear Power Plant should be immediately shut down in order not to experience the Chernobyl disaster, which caused the death of nearly 40 thousand people in 1986,” Karadag, the lawmaker from eastern Igdir province, told reporters in parliament.

According to him, Metsamor was constructed with the old Russian technology.

Metsamor is the most dangerous of the 443 nuclear plants in the world, the lawmaker said.

“In a possible major earthquake, the radiation emitted by the Metsamor Nuclear Power Plant will make our provinces of Igdir, Kars, Van, Agri, and Erzurum (south of the border) uninhabitable,” he said.

Metsamor, first launched in 1976, is just 16 kilometers (10 miles) from Turkey’s eastern border with Armenia and produces about 40% of the country’s electricity.

Both Turkey and Azerbaijan have repeatedly raised objections to the project as they believe it does not meet international safety standards.

Metsamor continues to draw criticism from Turkish officials as Armenia has decided to extend its operations until 2026.

YEREVAN, Armenia

Despite the absence of diplomatic relations and their closed border, Armenia and Turkiye have been engaged in trade for years via a roundabout route through Georgia, a state bordering both countries.

Now, as Ankara and Yerevan seek to normalize relations, Turkish-Armenian trade could flourish once more.

According to Richard Giragosian, a US-born Armenian who heads the Regional Studies Center (RSC) think tank in the capital Yerevan, economics and trade are now recognized as real incentives for normalization.

This was not the case years ago, he underlined, saying that the economic potential between Armenia and Turkiye and prospects of reopening the border are part of a broader regional restoration of trade and transport.

Armenia is a landlocked country with limited economic interactions with its region due to border closures with Azerbaijan and Turkiye. This contrasts with other South Caucasian nations who have long enjoyed vital trade and transport connections with their neighbors.

Today, Armenia has two border openings to the world — with Georgia to the north and Iran to the south. Georgia has provided Armenia with a gateway for foreign trade.

“This isn’t only a positive foundation, but it’s also an important first step at lowering transport costs,” Giragosian said.

No longer must trade bypass border restrictions and pass through Georgia, he added, noting that direct trade relations would automatically lower export and import costs.

Win-win atmosphere

Giragosian pointed out that the RSC has been conducting joint research with the Economic Policy Research Foundation of Turkiye (TEPAV).
“Our studies’ findings indicate that it’s the east of Turkey that will benefit most from cross-border trade, stability and jobs,” he said, using Turkiye’s former name.

Turkiye’s eastern region stands to gain the most from the border’s reopening, rather than the national economy, he said, both in terms of tourism and trade. “It’s a win-win,” he added.

Engaging in protectionism, building walls, closing borders does not encourage economic growth or development, just the opposite, he stressed.

“I would think the Armenian economy would welcome the competition, which will develop between Armenia and Turkey,” he stressed, saying the lack of diplomatic relations has led to a reality where the lack of information promotes misinformation.

Giragosian also said there is a shared challenge to recover from COVID-19. “And I do think new supply chains, new trade routes are beneficial, and there is little negative cost.”

Armenian IT sector promising for Turkish partners

In particular, Armenia’s growing IT sector would be in a good position to meet the needs of eastern Turkiye, the seasoned economist said. “The connection in terms of road and rail tourism, whether medical tourism or normal tourism, will only encourage benefits for Armenia, as well.”

He added that Armenia’s IT industry “is also distinctly positioned” to “add something new for Turkish partners.”

According to Giragosian, the most obvious industry to benefit from a reopening of the border is, in fact, Armenia’s Russian-owned energy sector, with plans to export surplus electricity to eastern Turkey.

He also underlined that Russian ownership of Armenia’s railway network and plans to restore the rail link between the northwestern Armenian city of Gyumri and Turkiye’s eastern Kars province ensures Moscow’s support for the process.

Giragosian also noted the attractiveness of the textile sector, in which Turkish subsidiaries of firms setting up factories in Armenia could take advantage of low wages and highly skilled Armenian labor. This would also facilitate expansion into new markets for Turkish and Armenian textile products.

“In general, I think the starting point is so low that progress is guaranteed,” he concluded.

Normalization as boon for regional development

Despite the Armenian economy’s much smaller size compared to Turkiye’s, it carries the potential for Ankara to enhance its position as a regional actor with an economic and political presence in the South Caucasus and as a market and recipient of investment, according to Guven Sak, the managing director of TEPAV.

According to Sak, normalization will be beneficial for both sides, noting fears on the Armenian side that opening the border would allow an influx of Turkish goods that could destroy the domestic industry.

He said similar arguments had been made and proven wrong in the runup to Turkiye’s Customs Union with the EU.

“On the contrary … Turkish industry became stronger,” he added.

Sak said he had sought to ease such concerns in Yerevan in a presentation he made there a decade ago.

“During that presentation, I told them: ‘Yours (industry) will be the same,'” he added.

He underlined that though Armenia “is not a place that can be a source of growth for the Turkish economy on a national scale,” it could be “extremely beneficial” as a regional development project for border cities.

Artur Ghazaryan, the program director of the Union of Manufacturers and Businessmen of Armenia, also commented on the issue, saying that conflicts must be resolved through a process starting with dialogue and progressing with cooperation and confidence-building.

“I believe the economy and business is the most sustainable area of cooperation since, once parties generate profit together, they will find it hard to stop,” he added.

He also stressed that efforts to develop ties anew would not be starting from scratch, noting that businesses on either side were cooperating despite the closed borders.

“In the absence of any official relations between Armenia and Turkey, there was one thing that was regulating relations between two countries: Business ethics,” he said.

Ghazaryan said that despite this groundwork, Armenian companies would face some problems navigating Turkiye’s customs system. Resolving these issues will be the first step towards the point in which the two sides could pursue joint investments, he said, adding that ensuring Turkish and Armenian firms are on equal footing could be the first step in the normalization process.

In spite of the closed borders, Armenia has imported goods from Turkiye via third countries such as Iran and Georgia. But, this remains a one-sided relationship with no significant trade flows from Armenia to Turkiye.