Lavrov says “information” about establishment of Turkish military bases in Azerbaijan is "rumors"

News.am, Armenia

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov did not comment on the information about the possible establishment of Turkish military bases in Azerbaijan, calling it a “rumor”, TASS reports.

“We have not discussed this issue, and we do not comment on the rumors,” the Russian FM told a news conference—when asked this question—after talks with his Belarusian counterpart Vladimir Makei.

Earlier, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan had not ruled out the possibility of establishing a Turkish military base in Azerbaijan—and within the framework of the “Shushi Declaration” that was signed recently between him and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev.

”I have honor’’ alliance answers questions of citizens in Ararat Province

”I have honor’’ alliance answers questions of citizens in Ararat Province

Save

Share

 20:01,

YEREVAN, JUNE 15, ARMENPRESS.  ‘’I have honor’’ alliance carried ut pre-election campaign in Ararat Province on June 15.

ARMENPRESS reports the leader of the election list of the alliance, head of ‘’Fatherland’’ Party Artur Vanetsyan and Head of the Republican Party of Armenia, 3rd President of Armenia Serzh Sargsyan  visited Masis city with their teammates and met with the residents, listened to their concerns and observations, answered them and talked about the existing problems and the solutions offered by their political force.

Armenia 3rd President on Nikol Pashinyan: The capitulator no longer has majority of votes

News.am, Armenia

Last evening, I had the chance to become familiar with a confidential report showing the statistics on the possible results of the upcoming elections across the country, and, according to that document the capitulator [Nikol Pashinyan] no longer has the majority of votes. Serzh Sargsyan, third President of Armenia and member of the “I Have the Honor” bloc which is running in the snap parliamentary elections to be held on June 20, said during today’s campaign meeting in Ararat Province.

“This information needs to inspire us all, and not just because we’re going to send these authorities home after the elections. You know, Armenians are sentimental and, in many cases, gullible, but over the past three years, we have almost always said that some people are charmed and others are under a spell, but after the losses and victims [of the war], it is safe to say that the people’s eyes have been opened. The capitulator will no longer be in power, and he knows this. We have two objectives. The first is to reinforce our victory with votes on June 20. The second is to defend our victory after the elections. I call on everyone to affirm this with votes on June 20,” Sargsyan said.


US reclaims Turkey for the Western alliance

Asia Times
[Turkey’s importance as a 'swing state' in US regional strategy has
increased dramatically as tensions rise with Russia]
 By MK Bhadrakumar
 
Less than 48 hours will separate US President Joe Biden’s meeting with
his Turkish counterpart Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Brussels from his
summit with Vladimir Putin at Geneva on June 16. In between falls the
shadow of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) summit. This
is simply exquisite as far as planning of sequential activities go in
diplomacy.
Biden’s meetings in Brussels and Geneva are, arguably, the most
consequential “bilaterals” he’ll be having in this entire eight-day
trip to Europe. The two events have variables, but their correlation
is not in doubt.
Most of the issues that will figure in Biden’s meeting with Erdogan
are related to Russia. Even when some US-Turkey issues do not directly
concern Russia, they do affect Russia’s vital interests.
The advantage goes to Biden insofar as the personal chemistry between
Erdogan and Putin is no longer what it used to be. Turkish-Russian
relations are fraught with growing friction on several fronts.
On the other hand, Turkey’s importance as a “swing state” in the US
regional strategy has increased dramatically, even as US-Russia
tensions spiked in recent months. The Biden administration’s
diplomatic overture to Turkey needs to be assessed from such a
perspective.
Without doubt, there are major differences in the Turkey-US
relationship. Both sides have a long list of problems. But the good
part is that the two sides are realistic and willing to focus on areas
where partnership is possible. Both have a sense of urgency to mend
their relationship.
Biden and Erdogan know each other well and their private conversation
can help turn a new page in the relationship. Conceivably, they will
aim for a relatively achievable relationship. In sum, manage
differences and revive the partnership – that is going to be the
leitmotif of the Biden-Erdogan meeting on Monday.
The differences are of three categories: political, geopolitical and
personal. On the political-personal part, the crux of the matter is
that Erdogan deeply distrusts US intentions toward Turkey and him
personally. The genesis of this estrangement is to be traced to former
president Barack Obama’s administration, and Biden happens to be
associated with it.
The manner in which the Obama administration coaxed Erdogan, who was a
close family friend of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, to join the
United States’ regime-change project in Syria and subsequently
disengaged itself from the project, leaving Turkey in the lurch,
profoundly upset Ankara.
Meanwhile, the US policy of assisting a faction of Syrian Kurds, the
YPG, began under the Obama administration, in 2014, and inevitably it
has been a ticking time bomb since then.
The strategic contradiction was simply far too much for Turkey to
accept – that the US got directly linked to a terrorist organization
that has long fought an insurgency against another NATO ally.
If that wasn’t bad enough, the failed coup attempt in 2016 to
overthrow Erdogan dealt a body blow to the Turkish-American
relationship. Turkey suspects that Obama was supportive of the coup
attempt and blamed the US for harboring the Islamist preacher Fetullah
Gulen. Washington simply stonewalled when Turks sought Gulen’s
extradition.
Suffice to say, Erdogan’s efforts during the past five-year period to
strengthen Turkey’s strategic autonomy, to develop relations with
Russia and to work toward building up Turkey as one of the great
powers in the region fall in perspective.
On the geopolitical plane, a whole lot of issues have cropped up
stemming out of Erdogan’s independent foreign policies in recent
years, but the issue that has driven a wedge between the US and Turkey
is, principally, Turkey’s purchase of the Russian S-400 missile
system.
Short of Turkey backing down on the S-400 missile deal with Russia,
Washington and Ankara are discussing some sort of mutually acceptable
formula such as the deployment of the missile system under US control
at the Incirlik airbase in southern Turkey, without any Russian
involvement in their operation and maintenance.
Turkey has reportedly given a written assurance to the Biden
administration that it will not activate the missile system. This
ingenious compromise could open a pathway for the lifting of the US
sanctions against Turkey under the Countering America’s Adversaries
Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA), which would revive Turkish
participation in the manufacture of parts for Lockheed Martin’s F-35
stealth fighter and give gravitas to the overall relationship.
This reconciliation could well be a key outcome of the meeting in Brussels.
f the S-400 hurdle that bedeviled Turkish-American relations in recent
years can be overcome, Russia will be suffering a major setback in its
regional strategies all across the board – and, Putin personally risks
a loss of face just before his summit with Biden, as the turnaround in
Russia-Turkey relations through the past few years was Putin’s
personal achievement.
No doubt, with the US backing, Turkey can be expected to revert to a
role it adroitly performed in the Cold War era as the vanguard of
Western strategies against Russia. Even more so, for the first time in
its history, NATO can consolidate a presence in the Black Sea. Of
course, with Turkish backing, Ukraine can push back at Russia with new
confidence.
Overall, it will be a game changer for US regional diplomacy in
Russia’s western and southwestern backyard. Interestingly, straight
after the meeting with Biden, Erdogan, in a symbolic move, will be
heading for the South Caucasus to visit the territories in
Nagorno-Karabakh that Turkey helped Azerbaijan conquer in recent
months.
Suffice to say, the geopolitics of the regions surrounding Turkey are
at an inflection point. The US has an urgent need to get Turkey on
board with its strategy to counter Russia in the entire region
stretching from the Caucasus and the Black Sea to Ukraine and Poland,
apart from West Asia proper. Turkey is potentially the best regional
partner in the United States’ efforts to contain Russia and Iran.
Most important, Turkey’s cooperation is critical to counter Russia’s
growing force projection in the Mediterranean where the US has been
establishing new bases lately. Turkey and the US also have a
congruence of interests in keeping Russia out of Libya (which NATO
visualizes as the gateway for its future expansion plans into Africa).
Equally, Washington and Ankara are negotiating a deal for the
deployment of Turkish troops to ensure that Kabul airport remains
operational and accessible to the NATO countries even after the
withdrawal of the US forces from Afghanistan, which is expected next
month.
Turkish Defense Minister Hulusi Akar said last Monday that Turkey is
willing to undertake the mission if it receives financial, logistical,
and political support from its NATO allies. This promises to be a
major step in confidence-building between the US and Turkey.
Again, what role Turkey can play in Central Asia to advance US
interests remains to be seen. Interestingly, just before he leaves for
Brussels, Erdogan is hosting the newly elected president of
Kyrgyzstan, Sadyr Japarov, who has a reputation for being a staunch
nationalist and authoritarian ruler. Kyrgyzstan is a poor country with
few resources, but it borders China.
Evidently, Erdogan is also under pressure internally, as his party’s
popularity dropped lately and the Turkish economy is in bad shape, and
the public discontent is palpable. Turkey also has lost confidence
among its traditional friends and allies. Its relations with the
European Union are in stagnation and with Greece and France under
strain.
All said, Erdogan simply cannot afford an inconclusive meeting with
Biden. Erdogan’s strategy will be to promote Turkey as the United
States’ best regional partner. He has shown a willingness to act
against Russian interests. Erdogan hosted the leaders of Georgia,
Poland and Ukraine – all at odds with Russia – in quick succession
since April.
Erdogan has pledged full support for Georgia’s bid to join NATO,
sealed a drone contract with Poland and voiced all-around support for
Ukraine in its standoff with Russia. Also, Turkey took an active part
in NATO’s Steadfast Defender exercises in Romania at the end of May.
Make no mistake, Erdogan is playing for time to extend his rule for
another five years after the next election due in 2023. And he needs
Biden’s support. Erdogan is an experienced leader, and so is Biden. It
should not come as a surprise if they find common ground despite the
many disagreements between Washington and Ankara.
 

‘This has to stop’: Armenian ombudsman concerned over pre-election atmosphere

Panorama, Armenia
June 9 2021

Armenia’s Human Rights Defender (Ombudsman) Arman Tatoyan expressed deep concerns over the atmosphere during the election campaign, stating it further deepens the polarization in society and undermines the prospect of restoring solidarity in the country.

“This has to stop! All political forces must exclude insults and swear words, any rhetoric related to hatred and violence,” Tatoyan said in a statement early on Wednesday.

“Candidates for prime minister from all political forces running in the elections should take into account that every word they use extends to their supporters, and then they insult each other with the same words.

“Those running for prime minister should be especially attentive to the words used and take into account all their figurative meanings,” he said, deploring caretaker Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s latest warning of “civil and political vendettas and sweeping personnel changes” if reelected and his use of swear words.

“The real danger of such rhetoric is that it further deepens the existing tensions and poses a risk of being carried over into real life. It’s true that the acting prime minister of Armenia emphasized that it is not about physical revenge, but, obviously, it did not neutralize the dangerous impact of the mentioned,” Tatoyan said.

The monitoring of the Ombudsman’s Office revealed that in the social media platforms where materials with the headlines “civil revenge”, “vendetta” and the like were spread, widespread insults, accusations and hate speech were recorded. These headlines confirm once again that the statements about non-physical revenge made no impact, the ombudsman said.

“The social media monitoring also revealed that the topic of a duel between a candidate for prime minister of the Armenia bloc and a prime ministerial candidate of the Civil Contract Party, the caretaker prime minister is also being discussed in the context of violence.

“In addition, during a meeting with the acting prime minister on June 8, one of the citizens claimed that he was sacked because, in his words, he refused to vote for the Armenia bloc’s PM candidate.

“This statement testifies to the violation of labor rights and a number of other rights, in connection with which the Human Rights Defender’s Office will send a notification to the Prosecutor’s Office,” Tatoyan said. 

CivilNet: Armenian Health Minister Apologizes for Improper Handling of Fallen Soldiers’ Corpses

CIVILNET.AM

02 Jun, 2021 01:06

By Emilio Luciano Cricchio 

Acting Health Minister Anahit Avanesyan has apologized for the improper handling of the preservation of the bodies of servicemen who were killed in the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh War. 

On May 31, photos emerged online of a crowded room filled with body bags on the floor that carried the remains of Armenian servicemen. It was later confirmed that the photo was taken at a morgue in the city of Abovyan. 

Avanesyan expressed regret for not personally visiting the morgues in question after bodies had been moved there. 

“I assure you that in the last year the Forensic Medical Center has done its best to ensure proper forensic medical examinations and identification processes,” Avanesyan wrote on Facebook.

Earlier, the Health Ministry announced that it would launch an official investigation into the improper storage conditions of the bodies of fallen servicemen. 

On June 1, the Health Ministry published new data from the Forensic Medical Center regarding the identification of corpses. The ministry assured that there are no bodies which have not been identified. According to the ministry’s statement however, there are about 50 bodies which forensicists have been unable to separate DNA from. In addition to this, about 149 bodies did not match the DNA of their relatives. 

Mane Gevorgyan, the spokeswoman for Acting Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, told Armenpress news agency that the Abovyan morgue case was inadmissible, and that the prime minister has ordered an official investigation to be launched to uncover those responsible. 

“All measures will be taken to hold the officials in question accountable,” said Gevorgyan.

Armenian President meets with Kazakhstan’s Minister of Industry and Infrastructural Development in Nur-Sultan

Save

Share

 10:57, 5 June, 2021

YEREVAN, JUNE 5, ARMENPRESS. President of Armenia Armen Sarkissian, who is in Kazakhstan on a working visit, met with Minister of Industry and Infrastructural Development Beibut Atamkulov, the Armenian President’s Office told Armenpress.

The officials discussed a broad range of issues relating to the Armenian-Kazakh commercial and industrial cooperation. They both noted that a lot still needs to be done to further strengthen the bilateral ties economically and utilize the existing potential completely. The sides emphasized the need for developing concrete programs. In particular, they touched upon expanding the cooperation in IT, food safety, agriculture, energy and a number of other areas, as well as boosting business ties.

The Armenian President and the Kazakh Minister attached importance to the necessity of more effectively and completely using the opportunities existing within the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU).

 

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

Highest state flag of Armenia raised in Chkalovka community

Save

Share

 20:41, 28 May, 2021

YEREVAN, MAY 28, ARMENPRESS. The Armenian Tricolor, the state flag of the Republic of Armenia, 53 meters high, was raised in the territory of “Noy Land” hotel complex in Chkalovka community of Gegharkunik region.

ARMENPRESS reports, Arsen Melkonyan, an employee of “Noy Land” recreation zone, assured that the flag is the highest in the territory of the Republic of Armenia at the moment. It is 70 meters above the level of Lake Sevan. The flag is 9 meters long and 4.5 meters wide. The initiative belongs to the owner of “Noy Land” recreation area.

Gnel Sanosyan, Governor of Gegharkunik Province, a number of MPs, Arthur Mkrtchyan, Head of the Gegharkunik Regional Department of the Police, Gevorg Galstyan, Head of the Gegharkunik Regional Rescue Department of the Ministry of Emergency Situations, other officials and guests took part in the solemn flag raising ceremony.

The blessing ceremony was performed by the Vicar of the Gegharkunik Diocese of the Armenian Apostolic Church, Fr. Partev Barseghyan. The Vicar recalled the names of the founders of the Republic of Armenia, the heroes fighting for the freedom of Armenia and wished peace and victory to our homeland.


Stepanakert: Azerbaijan creates bridgeheads for pressure on Karabakh, expansion towards Armenia

News.am, Armenia

Azerbaijan is creating bridgeheads for pressure on Nagorno-Karabakh and expansion towards Armenia. Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh) Foreign Minister David Babayan told this to Armenian News-NEWS.am, commenting on Azerbaijan’s large-scale road construction works around Artsakh.

Babayan noted that Azerbaijan has always had a very well-thought-out transport geopolitics. “Naturally, Azerbaijan tried it in Nagorno-Karabakh. In fact, transport policy was an integral part of administrative-territorial policy. If we look at the former NKAO map, we will see how it happened. Martakert [town], which has historically never been the center of the melikdom, was located on the outskirts of the region; it was very close to the border with the Azerbaijan SSR, becoming a regional center. The same with Martuni, Hadrut, Askeran [towns]. Khojalu [(Khojaly)] was separated from Stepanakert, which [Khojalu] was an Armenian settlement until the [19]60s, then became an Azerbaijani village.

That policy was conducted as follows: To reach Martakert from Stepanakert, you had to cross Aghdam [town]. Aghdam, Martuni, Fizuli also had to be crossed to reach Hadrut from Stepanakert. From Martuni to Martakert—via Aghdam. From Martuni to Hadrut—via Fizuli; that is, thus, they [the Azerbaijanis] were creating bastions, so-called ‘geopolitical fortresses.’ It was Aghdam, Fizuli, Lachin.

Lachin played a key role in the watershed between Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh; and if the road were fully operational, it would still be under control, nonetheless; we saw the same in Armenia.

And now we see an obvious expansionist policy. Thus, Azerbaijan strengthens its military presence in the region. We see here a far-reaching transport expansionist policy,” the Artsakh Foreign Minister concluded.

How This Armenian Wine Company Is Disrupting the Wine Industry

May 28 2021

Zack Armen Launched Storica Wines in 2017 with the goal of promoting Armenian culture in a way that resonates in the hearts and minds of US consumers through wine. As an Armenian-American businessman, Armen’s roots run deep in his home country.  He wants to help the world recognize Armenia for the beautiful place it is and the culture it represents.

Armenia’s “terroir,” which in wine lingo refers to the combination of climate, soil, and elevation, lends to flavor and aroma profiles that are pleasant, top notch, and reminiscent of other fine wines from around the world. Armen is ushering in an exciting new category in the wine world, through a set of brands representing the finest quality and _expression_ of Armenia’s rich heritage and renaissance in winemaking. With each bottle sold, Armen aims to share Armenia’s story as a burgeoning authority in wine and its history as the birthplace of wine with consumers in the United States. Storica wines express indigenous grapes grown 6,000 years ago, and they mirror the country’s fullness of life, and resiliency. 

Armen is charging his company forward as he breaks down barriers and disrupts the conventional wine industry. The road to Storica’s success is paved with new challenges, and the burgeoning company had to address different angles in their sales tactics, marketing, and brand building campaigns. Solidifying a brand in a competitive space is no easy task.  In this article, Armen discusses what it takes to build a new category of wine in the US, what makes Armenian wines so good, and how he plans to disrupt the wine industry in 2021. 

What is your vision for Storica wines?

We’re focusing on building a new category of Armenian wine in the United States. In this effort there is a really interesting tension between taking a disruptive, digital-centric approach like many other products and services do today, yet needing to participate in a heavily regulated, multi-tier trade system. We try to be highly respectful of working within the bounds of and with the parlance of the industry value chain, but at the same time realize that there is some out of the box thinking and doing we have to do to be successful in gaining US consumers’ attention. We are learning as we go and finding that ultimately having a great story and a high-quality product will win the day. 

Our big overarching goal is to bring these beautiful ancient wines, now being produced with a very high degree of quality and sophistication, to the US in such a way that speaks to and recognizes that history in ancient tradition but also has a modern methodology in which we’re engaging with consumers.

What makes Armenian wines so good?

The quality of Armenian wine is a function of a few key factors. The first is the terroir: the combination of climate, soil type, and elevation. Armenia gets 300 days of sunlight per year, which is significantly more than most countries in Europe. This high concentration of sunlight, when combined with high elevation vineyards, causes an intensity of climate that stresses the grape vines. Moreover, at high elevations there are more rapid changes in temperature, precipitation, and wind. When you combine all these factors, this delivers a highly complex flavor and aroma profile that gives Armenian wines their unique attributes. Armenia’s vineyards are mostly volcanic soil, which are best suited for good drainage and water retention. Lastly, and perhaps most importantly, Armenia’s leading grapes themselves are old, indigenous varieties which are high quality from a viticulture perspective and have an optimal combination of similarity to more commonly found quality grapes, such as Pinot Noir for the Areni red grape and Chenin Blanc for the Voskehat white grape. 

With all of these raw agronomic or viticulture positive attributes, the winemaking, or everything that happens after the grapes are harvested, is also key to the quality of the wines. Armenia is now blessed with several top notch and world-renowned winemakers, who have built large scale winemaking infrastructure across the country’s multiple winemaking regions. We are fortunate to work with one of the pioneers of the Armenian winemaking movement, Vahe Keushguerian, who has decades of winemaking experience in the US, Italy, and France. We will begin to work with additional winemakers later this year who have also had significant experience in winemaking and are producing globally recognized wines today. 

The future is bright for continued top quality wines coming out of Armenia at greater and greater scale, and we hope to work with many of these winemakers as we grow Storica’s business in the US. 

How is Storica achieving its goals as becoming a national brand ambassador?

We’ve focused on building a multi-faceted digital presence that tells the story of Armenian wine in a compelling, celebratory way. Overall, what we’re seeking to do is to be the category creator and leader of Armenian wine in the United States.  The way in which we’re doing that is we’re working with the best wineries in Armenia and bringing high-quality wines to the US in such a way that is nationally scalable, including people and processes across marketing, sales, operations, finance and logistics. To our knowledge, there are no other companies building such a scaled, multi-winery effort in the US in support of the Armenian wine category. Individual wineries are selling their wines in the US in certain states, but our understanding is these are all on a single-brand or single-winery basis. 

What type of consumers are you targeting?

We want to have a portfolio of wines that are attractive to a wide variety of American consumer profiles, from the casual wine drinker to the master somms of the world. We also want to ensure our portfolio spans various price points, and that each of our products have a strong price to quality ratio. Most of the wines in our portfolio today are in the $20-30 per bottle range, but we will have wine that’s priced lower and higher in the future. Ultimately it is that breadth of consumer that we’re really going after, since we see a home for Armenian wine in virtually every wine use case given how many wonderful and diverse wines there are from Armenia. 

What are your marketing strategies?

Storica has a strong digital marketing strategy focused on targeting three main consumer archetypes; Armenian communities, oenophiles and wine writers, and curious millennials. Armenia and the history of this emerging wine region is a topic that many audiences are excited to learn about and be among the first to share within their communities. Through social media, PR, digital advertising, virtual events, brand and influencer partnerships, Storica has the unique opportunity to educate consumers about Armenian wine. We are proud to see strong interest and positive reception from the likes of Karen MacNeil, Forbes, Haute Living, Armenian communities, wine clubs and more as a result.  

Zack Armen

What gave you the idea to start a wine company?

I grew up in the world of finance and then most recently in life sciences and biotech. My day job is business development for a biotech company. The inspiration behind Storica came out of one of my trips to Armenia in 2017, when I noticed that the wine was getting better very quickly. I started asking people why, and was introduced to Vahe and Aimee Keushguerian, two winemakers who are very active in this renaissance of Armenian wine, and they filled me in on what was going on. From their perspective, penetrating the US market was going to be key to the long-term success or failure of Armenian wine as a global wine region. I saw that as an opportunity to impact my homeland in a way that is multigenerational and hugely scalable when you think about the benefit of having a product like wine being a contributor to tourism, GDP growth, and job creation. I also saw it as a great opportunity to build a US-based business that had significant upside, and am humbled every day to see this come to fruition, and by the progress we’ve made as a company and the support we’ve received from our investors, partners, and consumers.  

What is your strategy for marketing to restaurants and stores?

For new wine & spirits brands it’s critical to have a presence in stores and restaurants, as opposed to simply selling online like many other products and services do. Successful wines have followed the playbook of getting top tier restaurant placements early on and to then build their brand off of that cache and credibility – because of Covid, we’ve not been able to start there of course, but as re-openings increase, we are highly focused on the restaurant channel. Growing up as a company during Covid has had its pluses and minuses, obviously lack of restaurant business being a minus. However, starting with a heavy focus on digital, on driving foot traffic into stores, and investing in beautiful content creation and social media engagement, will hopefully begin to pay dividends and allow us to seize the current opportunity to quickly ramp our on-premises sales. A goal for us is to get as many of our wines listed BTG (“by-the-glass”) on menus, because that is where you see the best velocity of sales movement and often see consumers more willing to try new brands from less common regions. This is a big priority for us over the coming weeks and months, alongside securing distribution partnerships with top tier distributors who share in our passion for this new wine category and see its potential the way we do at Storica.