La Turquie Dans Le Viseur De Washington

LA TURQUIE DANS LE VISEUR DE WASHINGTON
Jean Eckian

armenews
TURQUIE-USA

Peut-etre Erdogan devrait-il presenter des excuses a Israël pour
calmer les stratèges americains. Le regime islamiste d’Erdogan et de
Gul encaisse les deconvenues a un rythme absolument incroyable depuis
l’arrivee de la nouvelle administration americaine.

· La Coree du Sud, alliee US, renonce a la construction d’une centrale
nucleaire en Turquie ; · Le Pentagone a etabli un embargo très strict
de vente d’armes sophistiquees vers Ankara.

· Enfin, les Etats-Unis decident de transferer une grande partie
des forces et des structures strategiques de l’OTAN de Turquie vers
la Pologne et les Etats Baltes ! Si officiellement, on justifie ces
transferts pour se defendre de la menace Russe, dans les couloirs
feutres des chancelleries on parle d’une remise en question complète
des relations avec Ankara, suite a ses nombreuses provocations dont
la dernière en date concerne la signature d’un pacte militaire de
defense avec la Syrie et la preparation d’entraînements avec les
forces armees pakistanaises.

Erdogan et Gul ne s’attendaient certainement pas a cette ” claque ”
et se retrouvent a la merci des Russes qui eux, n’hesiteront pas un
instant a faire payer le prix fort aux piètres dirigeants turcs.

Le Pentagone commence a regarder avec bienveillance, surtout depuis
le resserrement des liens entre la Turquie, la Syrie et l’Iran,
la creation d’un etat Kurde qui ferait un parfait allie dans la region.

De son côte, Israël semble avoir tourne la page turque en renforcant
ses liens avec Chypre, la Grèce et la Roumanie. Pas plus tard que cette
semaine, des canadairs grecs et israeliens s’entraînaient ensemble.

JSSNews (lien) Marco Robin – Adapte par Bellar –

JSS News est un Webzine d’opinion edite depuis Jerusalem en francais

La Secretaire d’Etat americaine Hillary Clinton devrait effectuer
une “visite bilaterale de travail” en Turquie le mois prochain. Au
programme, le système de defense antimissiles et l’examen des
negociations sur le nucleaire entre l’Iran et l’occident. Ce voyage
s’inscrit après que la Chambre des representants ait “evite” de
s’exprimer sur la resolution armenienne qualifiant les evenements de
1915 comme etant un genocide.

From: A. Papazian

Piece de theatre sur le genocide armenien en Turquie

PIECE DE THEATRE SUR LE GENOCIDE ARMENIEN EN TURQUIE
Stephane

armenews
TURQUIE

Le celèbre acteur turc de theâtre, metteur en scène et producteur
Haldun Dormen a l’intention de realiser une pièce sur le genocide
armenien, le 24 avril 2011.

Le projet le plus recent de Dormen a ete une pièce en langue kurde
“histoire d’Hiver”dans le cadre du festival du theâtre a Ankara. Après
l’execution de la pièce le celèbre acteur a dit que son projet suivant
serait l’organisation d’une pièce sur le genocide armenien a annonce
Internethaber.

” Nejet Bayandur a ecrit une belle histoire. Il n’y a aucune accusation
dans l’histoire, cela decrit juste comment la belle vie populaire a
ete ecrasee, comment le paradis s’est metamorphose en enfer. C’est
une histoire d’amour et les evenements ont lieu a Van.

Les amants se rencontrent de nouveau 50 ans plus tard ” a dit Haldun
Dormen.

From: A. Papazian

Kirk Kerkorian (93 Ans) Serait Amoureux De Joan Dangersfield (58 Ans

KIRK KERKORIAN (93 ANS) SERAIT AMOUREUX DE JOAN DANGERSFIELD (58 ANS)
Krikor Amirzayan

armenews
vendredi 14 janvier 2011,

Kirk Kerkorian (93 ans), le multimilliardaire armeno-americain serait
selon le site Analitika.at.ua amoureux de Joan Dangerfield (58 ans),
la veuve de l’acteur et scenariste Rodnay Dagerfield disparu il y a
six ans. Le Kirk et Joan se seraient rencontres il y a deux ans au
cours d’une soiree mondaine. Une romance serait alors nee de cette
rencontre. Le 16 decembre 2010 les deux tourtereaux, main dans la
main devant les cameras de la CNN ont declare qu’ils formaient bien
un couple, lors des la soiree de depart du presentateur-vedette Larry
King. Neanmoins le mariage n’est pas au programme. L’un des amis de
Kirk Kerkorian a declare a ” Globe ” ” entre eux il y a un veritable
amour. A la vue de Joan, Kirk se remplit d’emotion et brille de joie.

Tout laisse a penser que Kirk est amoureux comme un jeune homme “.

Detail important : Kirk Kerkorian a ete marie trois fois.

From: A. Papazian

Le Genocide Des Armeniens Dans La Pravda

LE GENOCIDE DES ARMENIENS DANS LA PRAVDA
Jean Eckian

Pravda.ru
vendredi 14 janvier 2011,

Un nouvel éclairage ” sur la méthodologique extermination
des Arméniens est démontrée par Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey,
éditorialiste et rédacteur en chef du quotidien russe en ligne la
Pravda ” Ð~_Ñ~@авда ” (versions anglaise et portugaise). Une
référence supplémentaire.

Génocide Arménien : le Temps est venu d’affronter l’orage 8
janvier 2011

La Turquie souhaite adhérer a l’Union Européenne comme un pays
nouveau, moderne et dynamique. Elle a parfaitement le droit de
présenter sa candidature. Cependant, avant d’y parvenir, elle
doit assumer son passé, en admettre les erreurs et renouer avec
le progrès.

L’un des pires méfaits commis dans l’histoire de l’humanité a été
le Génocide Arménien, un fait que nie la Turquie.

Qu’y a-t-il a nier ? Par définition, un génocide est la destruction
délibérée et systématique, en tout ou en partie, d’un groupe
ethnique, racial, religieux ou national ; un massacre, par contre,
est un acte généralisé de meurtre de masse.

Le 24 avril 1915 est généralement tenu pour être le jour où le
génocide a commencé, un processus qui s’est prolongé au cours
et a la suite de la première guerre mondiale et qui a résulté
en la mort de 1 million a million et demi d’Arméniens. En fait,
le processus avait été commencé longtemps avant, lorsqu’au 14ème
et au 15ème siècle, les Arméniens étaient durement traités et
méprisés par les Turcs qui les appelaient giaours, (dont dérivent
les termes keffir, kaffir) ou infidèles. Les terres étaient pillées,
les femmes violées, les gens sommairement exécutés.

Les choses ont commencé a s’aggraver quand a partir de 1865, la
communauté arménienne commenca a s’opposer au gouvernement ottoman,
se plaignant en particulier de son statut de citoyens de deuxième
classe a travers l’empire mais particulièrement en Arménie de
l’Ouest, la où vivait une grande majorité de la population. Le
dirigeant de la communauté, Nerses II, Patriarche Arménien de
Constantinople, y dénoncait “les saisies de terres illégales,… les
conversions forcées de femmes et d’enfants, l’incendie criminel,
le racket le viol et le meurtre”.

Après la victoire de la Russie a la fin de la guerre russo-turque
(1877-1878), les Arméniens s’efforcèrent d’obtenir des Russes
qu’ils occupent les provinces peuplées d’Arméniens jusqu’a ce que le
gouvernement de l’empire ottoman mette en place d’amples réformes. La
Grande Bretagne s’y opposa et élimina en fait toute possibilité
qu’elles le soient. La conséquence pratique a été que le sultan
ottoman Abdul Hamid II lanca ses milices kurdes appelées Hamidye,
avec instruction de “faire des Arméniens ce qu’ils voulaient”. Il
s’ensuivit une période de provocation par les autorités ottomanes
(taxes supplémentaires), qui eut pour résultat les massacres de
Sassun (1894) et Zeitoun (1895/96). Des massacres s’ensuivirent dans
tout l’empire, a Bitlis, Diyarbékir, Kharput, Sivas, Trébizonde
et Van ( les Massacres Hamidiens, qui selon des évaluations
indépendantes, ont tué entre 100 000 et 300 000 personnes).

Hamid a été détrôné par un coup d’état organisé par le Mouvement
Jeune Turc (1908) mais en 1909 une réaction eut lieu et l’armée
ottomane pilla les communautés arméniennes, massacrant encore 15
000 a 30 000 personnes (Massacres d’Adana).

Des massacres au Génocide

L’Empire Ottoman entra dans la Première Guerre Mondiale du côté des
Puissances Centrales (Allemagne et Autriche) et chercha immédiatement
a compenser ses pertes de la guerre russo-turque en faveur de la
Russie. Il en a résulté la Bataille de Sarikamish (1914), dans
laquelle l’armée ottomane a été défaite une nouvelle fois. Les
autorités ottomanes reprochèrent aux Arméniens la part qu’ils
avaient prise dans cette victoire et c’est ainsi que commenca une
politique de génocide systématique. Les Arméniens a travers l’empire
furent enrôlés dans des unités désarmées, affectés a des tâches
épuisantes et sommairement massacrés par des escadrons de mort turcs.

Le 24 avril est le jour du Dimanche Noir, lorsqu’ environ 250
intellectuels arméniens a travers l’Empire Ottoman furent assaillis
et arrêtés, placés dans des centres de détention près d’Ankara
puis déportés.

Le Génocide avait commencé. Aitan Belkind, un observateur dans
l’armée ottomane, parle de 5 000 Arméniens brulés vifs par les
Turcs. Des populations entières de villages étaient rassemblées
et jetées au feu.

“La méthode la plus rapide pour se débarrasser des femmes et des
enfants concentrés dans les différents camps était de les brÔler.”

“Des prisonniers turcs qui avaient apparemment assisté a de
telles scènes étaient horrifiés et perturbés lorsqu’ils se les
rappelaient.

Ils ont raconté aux Russes que l’odeur de la chair humaine brÔlée
imprégnait encore l’air pendant plusieurs jours.”

Le Consul Américain de Trébizonde déclare que “Beaucoup des
enfants étaient embarqués dans des bateaux et emmenés au large et
jetés a l’eau.” D’autres membres de représentants diplomatiques
ont témoigné de la mort de milliers de personnes noyées dans la
Mer Noire. En prélude aux pratiques nazies de la Shoah, beaucoup
d’autres ont été gazés a mort tandis qu’a de nombreux enfants,
parmi lesquels de nombreux nourrissons, on inoculait délibérément
la fièvre typhoïde au cours de “programmes d’inoculation”.

Un examen de cette carte nous permet d’évaluer l’extrême niveau
d’organisation de ce qui était un programme délibéré d’élimination
d’un peuple et de leur influence culturelle : un génocide.

Confiscation de biens, expulsion de leur foyer ancestral, meurtre,
pillage, viol… tout s’est déroulé sous le voile de la “sécurité
nationale” auquel a été adjointe une nouvelle politique de “famine de
masse” décrit par le New York Times comme “systématique”, “autorisé”
et “organisé par le gouvernement.” Le Président Théodore Roosevelt
a décrit plus tard cette politique comme “le plus grand crime de
la guerre.”

Une autre méthode employée par les ottomans pour tuer des grandes
quantités de personnes était la marche forcée, dans laquelle
les gens étaient forcés de couvrir des grandes distances dans des
conditions inhospitalières sans le moindre dispositif pour assurer
leur sécurité.

Ces colonnes étaient fréquemment attaquées et pillées par les turcs
sous le regard des soldats turcs, ou autrement étaient attaquées
par les soldats eux-mêmes.

Des ingénieurs allemands ont été les témoins de milliers
d’Arméniens entassés dans des wagons a bestiaux des chemins de
fer turcs.

L'”extermination totale des Arméniens de Transcaucasie” a été
citée par le Major Général Von Lossow, chef du Plénipotentiaire
miliaire allemand dans l’empire ottoman en 1918.

Et pour finir, les camps de concentration. Ceux qui survivaient
aux marches forcées et aux conditions écŔurantes des wagons a
bestiaux ont été entassés dans quelques 25 camps de concentration
dressés en Syrie, principalement près de la frontière avec l’Irak
d’aujourd’hui (c’est-a-dire au milieu de nulle part). Les sites
suivants sont essentiellement des camps d’extermination : Radjo,
Katma, Azaa, Lale, Tefridje, Dipsi, Del-El et Ra’s al-Ain.

Si cela n’est pas une politique de Génocide, je ne vois pas ce que
cela peut-être. Pour quelles raisons la Turquie ne veut-elle pas
l’assumer et admettre que ce qu’elle a commis est une erreur ? La
question du rapatriement des terres volées a l’Arménie en est
une autre, qui appartient a un autre chapitre nauséabond du droit
international.

From: A. Papazian

Arrives To Cyprus On Monday 17 January At 9:00am

ARRIVES TO CYPRUS ON MONDAY 17 JANUARY AT 9:00AM
Simon Aynedjian

Gibrahayer e-magazine
Thursday 13 January 2011

The Office of the Armenian MP Vartkes Mahdessian has informed us that
the Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan arrives to Cyprus on Monday
17 January at 9:00am for an official visit to Cyprus. He is being
accompanied by a delegation of Armenian businessmen who will attend
a joint Armenia – Cyprus business forum in Nicosia.

President Serzh Sargsyan will have meetings with President Demetris
Christofias at the Presidential Palace, the President of the Cyprus
House of Representatives Marios Garoyian, as well as Archbishop
Chrysostomos.

Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan will address an afternoon special
session of the Cyprus Parliament at 3:30pm, that will be aired live
from the Cyprus national TV RIK.

Together with Armenian MP Vartkes Mahdessian, President Sargsyan will
visit Nareg school in the afternoon and at 5:00pm attend the opening
of old Armenian manuscripts exhibition at the Cultural Center of the
Ministry of Education and Culture at Ifigenias 27 (off Armenia street).

The official visit of the Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan to Cyprus
will be concluded by a dinner at the Presidential Palace.

From: A. Papazian

Armenian Quarter Renovations In Turkish-Occupied Nicosia In Full Swi

ARMENIAN QUARTER RENOVATIONS IN TURKISH-OCCUPIED NICOSIA IN FULL SWING

EXPECTED TIME OF COMPLETION OF PROJECT, FUNDED BY USAID IS IN 12 MONTHS

The restoration is a Development Programme funded by USA and the UN
Development Programme and executed by the United Nations Office for
Project Services

Simon Aynedjian – Gibrahayer e-magazine Thursday 13 January 2011 –
The renovations of the Armenian quarter in Turkish-occupied Niosia
are in full swing and this ambitious project – that includes all of
the Armenian quarter in Turkish-occupied Nicosia – has got a delivery
date of 12 months, according to project staff who guided us through
the renovation sites of what was the heart of the Armenian community
of Nicosia decades ago.

All buildings that are in the complex are receiving the face-lift
they deserve. Our evaluation is that it is much more than that.

Buildings that were left to the mercy of natural decay, to settlers
who were living in the school complexes and the deliberate vandalism
that our places of worship had been subjected to, are undergoing a
fundamental “back to the past” treatment, which together with its
completion will perhaps bring back memories of how our community
remembers its home.

Unfortunately after almost 50 years of deprivation of our properties –
since the inter-communal fightings of 1963 and the subsequent invasion
by Turkey in 1974 – most of the older generation are no longer with
us to witness the revival of Armenian quarter. Most of them left this
world without seeing its decay. Perhaps a blessing.

When on 2 December, 2008 the Armenian community of Cyprus was being
briefed by a team of Italian architects about the restoration plan,
perhaps very few believed that this would be materialised. Our
community and the Cypriot people have no reasons to believe otherwise.

But there.

What we witnessed told a different story.

The kindergarten completely renovated, the two school buildings
being painted, The Armenian Prelature restored and receiving a final
touch-up, while the Armenian Church Sourp Asdvadzadzin receiving the
most delicate and detailed treatment of them all. With the bell tower
restored, a team of eight masked Turkish Cypriots were working like
bees on the inner walls of the Church. The massive smoke and dust
that was coming out of the windows and the doors of the Church could
have fooled anyone that the Church was being bombed !

Hardly…

The Turkish Cypriot head of the construction assured us that the
project was on schedule and invited us for coffee.

You can view more images of the restoration process at the following
link:

From: A. Papazian

http://1in.am/eng/world_more_125.html
www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=2091449&id=1543460178&l=42722f9f3f

Artak Shakaryan: Nabucco Of Political Rather Than Economic Importanc

ARTAK SHAKARYAN: NABUCCO OF POLITICAL RATHER THAN ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE
Anna Balyan

“Radiolur”
11.01.2011 16:20

Public discussions have started in Turkey regarding the efficiency
of constructing Nabucco pipeline. The debates are held in the cities
through which the pipeline should pass – Ardahan, Kars, Erzurum,
Gumushkhane, Sivas, Kirshehir, Kirikkale. The final stage will be held
in Ankara. The pipeline will supply Azerbaijani and Middle Asian gas
to Europe.

One of Turkey’s priorities is to become a crossroad for all pipelines.

In this respect, Nabucco is of great political rather than economic
importance, expert of Turkish studies Artak Shakaryan says.

Russia opposes the project and is carrying out an alternative South
Stream program that will import gas from Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan to
Europe via Russia. Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has repeatedly
criticized Nabucco project, noting that it is not perspective. It is
not mere coincidence that construction of the pipeline is constantly
delayed. According to recent data, it will be launched in 2012.

Meanwhile, European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso and Energy
Commissioner Guenter Oettinger are to visit Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan
this week to try to secure gas for Nabucco from the region.

China, which challenges Russia and the US in Central Asia will also
enter the region soon, Artak Shakaryan says.

From: A. Papazian

Darchinyan Protests Fight With Mares

DARCHINYAN PROTESTS FIGHT WITH MARES

Tert.am
11.01.11

After viewing the Abner Mares versus Vic Darchinyan bout several
times, Elias Nassar, the manager of the former IBF/WBC/WBA champion is
disgusted with the scoring and the referee of the SHOWTIME bantamweight
bout. Nassar talks to Fightnews and gives reasons for his protest
that includes YouTube links.

“I find it very difficult to accept the loss of my fighter after
viewing the replay of the fight countless times. Directly after
viewing the bout, I initially accepted the final result. I noted
that the fight was very close and without bias I had Vic Darchinyan
winning 114-112,” said Nassar.

“I also initially accepted that the fight was close enough for any
person who may have watched the bout to pick either fighter as the
winner and the rounds could have been judged for the frequency of
punches Mares was throwing or for the clean hard punches being landed
by Vic.”

Further Nassar said that he doesn’t accept what he called the “sub
standard officiating of the bout by referee Howard and one of the
judges”.

“In relation to one of the judges scorecard’s, I am dumbfounded one
judge could have scored nine out of twelve rounds to Mares including
the last seven rounds. There is no way whatsoever that Mares could have
won nine out of twelve rounds. What is also most alarming though is
the refereeing of the bout. This collectively has lead to a official
protest being lodged,” he said.

“I purposely waited to view the bout in it’s entirety to make one
comment on the bout. Vic Darchinyan was hit with blatant and illegal
low blows. Vic was hit with over 20 low blows over the duration of the
bout, 14 of which were direct hits to his groin area. The game plan of
Mares was to push Vic back, but with low blows. On the the fourth low
blow administered by Mares he was deducted one point for that blatant
low blow, for the remainder of the bout Vic was hit with a further
10 direct low blows, five of these low blows were given on the run
warnings by referee Howard but there was no further point deductions.

A week after the fight to our surprise a Sports Sciences documentary
that was produced by the US Division of Fox Sports aired, this episode
was produced two years earlier. It demonstrated what exactly happens
when a fighter is hit with low blows. The person demonstrating the
action of throwing a low blow was none other than Abner Mares.”

From: A. Papazian

Hraparak: Hrazdan TPP’s CEO Pays Big Salaries To Deputies

HRAPARAK: HRAZDAN TPP’S CEO PAYS BIG SALARIES TO DEPUTIES

Tert.am
11.01.11

2011 started with mass layoffs for the Hrazdan Thermal Power Plant
(TPP) as Chief Executive Officer Arsen Grigoryan decided to fire 200
-or even 400- employees, the paper comments.

The employees of Hrazdan TPP have been enraged by the fact that shortly
after becoming the CEO, Grigoryan hired six deputies in addition to
the three existing ones. His deputies, who are mainly his relatives,
are paid 3 million drams (approx. $8,400) in monthly salaries.

The paper comments that paying 3 million drams to 6 deputies is
a luxury and therefore lay-offs are needed to save money for that
purpose.

From: A. Papazian

The Genocide Convention At 60: A Record Of Failure –And Double S

THE GENOCIDE CONVENTION AT 60: A RECORD OF FAILURE –AND DOUBLE STANDARDS
By Bill Weinberg

Published on World War 4 Report ()
Created 01/12/2011 – 20:45

Sixty years ago, on Jan. 12, 1951, the UN Convention on the Prevention
and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide [1], took effect, its text [2]
for the first time defining the crime of genocide under international
law, establishing punishments and the responsibility of signatory
nations to act against it. The world has nonetheless witnessed several
genocides since then.

The first genocide of the 20th century was the liquidation of
approximately one and a half million Armenians [3] in Turkey between
1915-17. But it was Adolf Hitler’s systematic annihilation of Jews
(and Roma [4]) during the Second World War that crystalized the issue
for the world. The postwar Nuremberg trials of Nazi criminals took
place prior to the adoption of the Genocide Convention by the UN
General Assembly in December 1948.

The Convention, which entered into force in January 1951, became
the first international document referring to the concept of
genocide–first coined by the Polish-Jewish lawyer Rafael Lemkin
during World War II. In the beginning the term existed only in the
Polish language (ludobójstwo), but in 1944 Lemkin adapted it for use
in the English language as “genocide,” from the Greek genos (race,
nation) and the Latin cide (to kill).

The Convention establishes that genocide is a crime according
to international law, whether committed during a time of war
or peace. Actions intended to destroy, in whole or in part,
a national, ethnic, racial or religious group of people are
considered genocide. The aim of the Convention is to punish this
crime, the prosecution of which may never be subject to a statute
of limitations, and to deter potential perpetrators. The fact that
some evident cases of genocide have been found not to fall under
the Convention’s definition means the definition has never become a
generally recognized measurement for distinguishing actual genocides
from other, less serious cases of mass killing.

The first trial of a genocide began in the year 1993 with the creation
of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia
(ICTY [5]), based at The Hague. In 2001, Slobodan Milosevic [6],
the president of Yugoslavia and then Serbia, was brought to trial
there. He died during the proceedings in March 2006. Former Bosnian
Serb leader Radovan Karadzic [7] was brought to trial there in October
2009. Ratko Mladic [8], the former commander of the Bosnian Serb Army,
is also wanted for genocide and war crimes, but remains at large.

The most famous case of genocide reviewed by the tribunal is evidently
the Srebrenica massacre [9]. In February 2007 the International Court
of Justice handed down a judgment in 14 cases from the Bosnian War
(1992-1995). The court found the murder of 8 000 Bosnian Muslims at
Srebrenica had been a genocide which Belgrade could have prevented,
but ruled that Serbia did not bear direct responsibility [10] for
the killing.

Genocide charges have been brought by international courts against
two other heads of state: former president of Liberia Charles Taylor
[11], whose trial was resumed in 2008, and Sudanese President Omar
al-Bashir[12], who was sued by the International Criminal Court (ICC
[13]) for crimes and genocide committed in the west Sudanese region
of Darfur [14].

In 1999, a commission investigating the mass killings in Rwanda [15]
said the UN and its member states must “clearly apologize” to the
Rwandan people for not preventing the genocide of roughly 800,000
minority Tutsis and moderate Hutus there in 1994. The commission said
the UN had failed by not demonstrating enough political will to end
the killing. Belgium, France and the USA were also criticized.

The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR [16]) has
already sentenced many people for their crimes. In 2008, former
colonel Theoneste Bagosora [17], the leader of the Hutu militia,
was sentenced to life in prison for genocide; one year later,
Tharcisso Renzaho, the former governor of Kigali, received the same
punishment. Other war criminals have also been sentenced by various
African and European courts.

The chemical weapon attack on the Kurdish population of the Iraqi city
of Halabja [18] in 1988, the killing sprees of the Khmer Rouge [19]
in Cambodia during the 1970s, and the use of the Chinese Army in Tibet
[20]during the 1950s have all been pointed to by legal scholars as
showing signs of having been genocide. The international community
did not effectively intervene in those cases. (Czech Press Agency
[21], Jan. 12)

A total of 137 nations are now party to the Convention, but 50
nations–including Indonesia [22], Japan [23] and Nigeria [24]–are
not. Bolivia [25] became the newest party to the Convention in 2005
(and has charged former president Gonzalo Sánchez de Lozada [26]
with the crime of genocide under its national law). (Prevent Genocide
[27], June 14, 2005)

The long delay in United States ratification of the Convention stemmed
in part from fears that US officials might come under “frivolous”
accusations of genocide. Not until February 1986–nearly four decades
after the convention was signed–did the US Senate vote 83 to 11 in
favor of ratification, albeit with a list of “reservations” in the
resolution of ratification. It took another two years before Congress
passed legislation that actually implemented the convention, by
making genocide a crime under US law. Even after the ratification was
approved (with reservations), US officials and legislators continued
to debate the scope of the convention and the means of enforcement. As
demonstrated during the mass killings in Rwanda, US and other Western
leaders have been reluctant to enforce the Convention. As a result,
they have refrained from using the term “genocide” to describe even
clear instances of systematic, ethnically targetted killing. (Science
Encyclopedia [28])

Few commentaries on the Convention have noted cases in which the US not
only failed to intervene to halt genocide, but also directly backed
regimes that were carrying it out–most notably Guatemala. The 1999
findings of the UN-backed Guatemala Historical Clarification Commission
[29] estimated 200,000 dead in the civil war that lasted from 1962 to
1996, squarely accusing the Guatemalan state of “genocide.” Guatemala
was a major recipient of US aid nearly throughout this period. While
President Jimmy Carter cut off military aid under his “human rights”
policy, but Ronald Reagan moved to have it restored, saying that the
regime had received a “bum rap [30].”

Romeo Lucas García [31], who had masterminded the worst of the
genocide in the early ’80s, died a free man in 2006. His successor
as dictator, Efraín Rios Montt [32], who continued the genocidal
campaign against the country’s indigenous Maya population, has never
faced charges before any international body, and remains active in
Guatemalan politics today.

Another such example is provided by East Timor [33] which won
independence from Indonesia in 2002 after years of atrocities. An
independent report commissioned by the UN transitional administration
in East Timor said that at least 100,000 Timorese died as a result
of Indonesia’s 25-year occupation. (BBC Country Profile [34]) The US
provided military aid to Indonesia for much of this period. President
Obama’s first Director of National Intelligence, former Pentagon
Pacific Command chief Adm. Dennis C.

Blair [35], is accused of having given Jakarta a “green light [36]”
for repression in East Timor when the killing was at its worst in 1999.

From: A. Papazian

http://ww4report.com