Armenian FM – Minsk Group Only Mandated Body To Resolve Karabakh Iss

ARMENIAN FM – MINSK GROUP ONLY MANDATED BODY TO RESOLVE KARABAKH ISSUE

hetq
[ 2011/03/04 | 12:57 ]

Armenia’s Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian told the OSCE Permanent
Council that the OSCE Minsk Group remains the only internationally
sanctioned arrangement for negotiations on the settlement of the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

“The OSCE has an important role in dealing with security and
co-operation issues,” he said. “In the current fragile regional
environment we regard it as a valuable component of our security.

Armenia is ready to contribute, in the spirit of the principles
set forth in the Helsinki Final Act, to the efforts to revitalize
this Organization by making it stronger, more reliable, effective
and responsive.”

Speaking on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, Nalbandian said that “over
the past years Armenia has spared no effort to find a peaceful and
long-lasting resolution to the conflict”.

Regarding Armenia’s state building efforts, Nalbandian stressed the
efforts of Armenia to ensure the sustainability of its progress in
building modern society based on the rule of law and respect of human
rights and fundamental freedoms, including in the field of the media
and fight against corruption.

From: A. Papazian

Armenian Woman Faces Deportation In U.S.

ARMENIAN WOMAN FACES DEPORTATION IN U.S.

hetq
[ 2011/03/04 | 13:03 ]

U.S. immigration officials have told Silva Mamigonian that she must
return to her native Armenia by March 17.

The Rancho Cordova woman faces deportation because she entered this
country illegally nine years ago with someone else’s passport and
claimed to be a U.S. citizen, officials contend.

“The courts dismissed that claim as false but ICE (Immigration and
Customs Enforcement) continues to state it as fact,” said family
friend Russ Reece. “Now the family is falling apart.”

Mamigonian and her Armenian-born husband, Nishan Simonyan, a U.S.

citizen, have two young sons, who also are U.S. citizens.

Reece said friends and family have helped with the couple’s $100,000
legal fees, including a recent $7,000 retainer to Mamigonian’s
attorney.

A hearing about her deportation is pending before the 9th U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals.

From: A. Papazian

ANCA : Azerbaijani Massacres Of Armenians In Sumgait And Baku Rememb

ANCA : AZERBAIJANI MASSACRES OF ARMENIANS IN SUMGAIT AND BAKU REMEMBERED IN CONGRESSIONAL SPEECHES

Noyan Tapan

03.03.2011

(Noyan Tapan – 03.03.2011) “Mr. Speaker, just as we cannot allow the
first genocide of the twentieth century to fade into history, the
memory of the victims of Sumgait must not be forgotten either.” – Rep.
Adam Schiff (D-CA)

WASHINGTON, DC – In a series of floor speeches over the past two
weeks, Members of Congress have condemned Azerbaijan’s aggression
against the Armenian populations in Sumgait (1988) and Baku (1990),
reported the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA).

Congressional Armenian Caucus Co-Chair Frank Pallone (D-NJ) and
Representatives Jim Costa (D-CA), Anna Eshoo (D-CA), Adam Schiff
(D-CA) and Jackie Speier (D-CA) each offered moving remarks printed
in the U.S. Congressional Record, condemning the brutal attack on
Armenians by Azerbaijani forces and organized mobs in Sumgait from
February 27-29, 1988, and also in Baku in 1990.

“The 3-day massacre in the winter of 1988,” explained Rep. Schiff,
“resulted in the deaths of scores of Armenians, many of whom were
burnt to death after being brutally beaten and tortured. Hundreds
of others were wounded. Women and girls were brutally raped. The
carnage created thousands of ethnic Armenian refugees, who had to
leave everything behind to be looted or destroyed, including their
homes, cars and businesses.”

Citing gruesome testimony by survivors describing the Azerbaijani
pogroms, Rep. Speier noted: “Tenants were dragged from their
apartments. If they tried to run and escape, the mob attacked them.

The mob used metal rods, knives and hatchets, after which bodies
were thrown into the fire. But shockingly most of the Azeris who
committed these horrific acts and their accomplices in government
were not brought to justice.”

Rep. Pallone explained that “The Sumgait massacre is but one example
in a long line of Azerbaijan’s aggression and hostility against the
Armenian people. Just two years later, the disappearance of a 450,000
strong Armenian community in Azerbaijan was witnessed. While Azerbaijan
claims that events in Baku were about the liberation of Azerbaijani
people from the Soviet occupation, the truth is that Mikhail Gorbachev
had to send Soviet troops to the Azerbaijani capital to stop the mass
killings and deportations of Armenians organized by the Government
of Azerbaijan.”

Rep. Costa spotlighted the U.S. response to the Sumgait massacres,
stating “Within months of the Sumgait massacres, the U.S. Senate
unanimously passed Amendment 2690 to the FY 1989 Foreign Operations
Appropriations bill (H.R. 4782) in July 1988, concerning the
Karabakh conflict and calling on the Soviet government to “respect
the legitimate aspirations of the Armenian people.” The amendment
also noted that “dozens of Armenians have been killed and hundreds
injured during the recent unrests.”

Rep. Eshoo detailed the very personal connection she has to
Azerbaijan’s ethnic cleansing campaign, stating, “My own family members
fled the slaughter of the Armenian Genocide under the Ottomans, and
when we learned of the massacres against Armenians in 1988, we saw
history repeating itself. These vicious acts of murder, targeted at
ethnic groups, must be forcefully condemned whenever and wherever
we see them. Yet 96 years after the slaughter, Congress has yet to
officially recognize the Armenian Genocide. Without our recognition
and our forceful condemnation, the cycle of violence will continue.”

Earlier this week Members of the U.S. House joined with Nagorno
Karabakh Republic Foreign Minister Georgi Petrossian in commemorating
the Sumgait and Baku pogroms at a Capitol Hill observance of these
crimes. Petrossian explained that, “On February 20, 1988, the people
of Karabakh expressed their will, and utilizing the relevant legal
framework, petitioned the Soviet authorities of the time to resolve
the Karabakh issue. The events in Sumgait took place exactly eight
days later. To this day, Azerbaijan argues that Sumgait and Baku were
a chapter in their struggle for independence from the Soviet Union and
that Armenians were somehow hindering that effort. The Bible says that
there is no secret which can be hidden permanently, and God willing,
the truth and the perpetrators of these heinous crimes will one day
be brought to light and justice.”

The Foreign Minister went on to note that the Sumgait massacres were
the beginnings of broad ethnic cleansing efforts in Azerbaijan that
the Azerbaijani government intended to extend to Karabakh as well.

“Every person, every nation, has the right to live free; every person,
every nation has the right to defend itself,” noted Petrossian. “The
people of Karabakh asserted that right “that God-given right ” and
will never give it up.” Representatives Pallone, Eshoo, Elliot Engel
(D-NY) and Brad Sherman (D-CA) were among Congressional leaders
participating in this solemn commemoration.

The 23rd Anniversary of the Sumgait massacres and the ensuing
Azerbaijani onslaught against the Armenians throughout Azerbaijan,
including the Baku pogroms of 1990, were marked worldwide with protests
and observances held in Argentina, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, France,
Germany, Greece, Holland, Italy, Lebanon, Russia, Syria and the United
States, in addition to Armenia and the Republic of Nagorno Karabakh.

To learn more about the Azerbaijani pogroms against
Armenians in Sumgait and Baku, read the ANCA fact sheet:

To view photos of protests and international observances of the
Azerbaijani massacres, visit the ANCA Facebook page.

;l=a125fba32b&id=16968936858

From: A. Papazian

http://www.anca.org/assets/pdf/misc/sumgait_baku_factsheet.pdf
http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=275105&
www.nt.am

The Second Move In The 2011 Genocide Obfuscation Gambit?

THE SECOND MOVE IN THE 2011 GENOCIDE OBFUSCATION GAMBIT?
David Davidian

Noyan Tapan

03.03.2011

(Noyan Tapan – 03.03.2011) At about this time every year the Turkish
government engages in political antics, the purpose of which is to
counter any incremental success Armenians have achieved in their
quest for recognition of the Turkish genocide of 1.5 million Armenians.

During April of 1915, under the guise of WWI, the Turkish government
condemned the entire Armenian citizenry under its jurisdiction, and
some of the neighboring lands, to extermination. The crime and denial
of genocide isn’t a game, but international relations is a contest.

In past years, major US defense contractors have presured members
of Congress urging them not to undertake any vote for genocide
recognition, so as not to “offend” their Turkish customers. Also,
past US Secretaries of State either individually or collectively,
have pleaded a similar story to members of Congress, recommending
that any recognition of genocide would anger the Turks.

The US Congress regularly reaffirmed or otherwise memorializes
historical events including the near destruction of Native Americas
and the Nazi Holocaust of European Jews. Official US recognition,
and to a similar extent an Israeli recognition, of the genocide of
the Armenians would ease the way for Armenian reparations. Turkey is
becoming more confident of its role globally and in the region. It
endeavors to assert influence by representing itself as a big brother
to regional Muslim states. Turkey finds itself in a position from which
it can simultaneously divert the attention of the Armenian diaspora
while providing face-saving excuses vis-a-vis engagement with Armenia
for major powers to ignore Armenian demands for genocide recognition.

Since around 2003, Armenia and Turkey have been in deliberations with
the goal of establishing diplomatic relations and opening their common
border. This border was unilaterally shut by Turkey in 1993 as Armenian
forces were succeeding in securing the region of Nagorno-Karabakh
from Azerbaijani rule.”The Protocol on the Establishment of Diplomatic
Relations Between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Turkey”
was officially signed and simultaneously announced in Berne, Yerevan,
and Ankara on Aug. 31, 2009. On the heals of this announcement, Turkey
attached preconditions to any Turkish ratification. As a result, this
document is all but dead, even though the signed protocol passed legal
approval by Armenia’s Constitutional Court. It was rather presumptuous
for Turkey to have set post-facto pre-conditions. This lack of Turkish
resolve allowed the Armenian president, Serge Sargsyan the latitude
to take a tougher stance on the genocide issue. On March 24, 2010,
at the Armenian Genocide memorial in the Syrian desert at Der Zor,
Sargsyan give a hard hitting speech against the policies of the
Turkish government, calling it the last stop on the Armenian death
marches. Sargsyan called Der Zor the Armenian Auschwitz. As Sun Tzu
said, “Opportunities multiply as they are seized.”

On February 7, 2011 in an article
published in the Turkish newspaper Sabah
()
author Duygu Guvenc wrote that Turkish Minister of State, Egemen
BagıÅ~_, after attending the January 27, 2011 Holocaust Remembrance
Day (first for a Turkish state minister) in Istanbul, was instructed
to subsequently attend Armenian April 24th activities. Apparently
only Sabah reported this, although it was picked up by many Armenian
media outlets. Since Guvenc’s article is still on an active web site
and has not been retracted, it appears to be an official trial balloon
looking for any Armenian reaction. Alternatively, it could be Turkey’s
first move in the 2011 genocide obfuscation gambit.

It is a challenge to suggest or predict Armenia’s reaction to this
Turkish ploy because moves like these are not zero-sum, nor made in
isolation. There is also a lack of information from ongoing diplomatic
efforts, if they even exist, in whatever form. There are costs in
making foreign policy decisions, and similarly, in not making them.

Given the limited information available to us, what might an Armenian
response be?

Turkish general elections are scheduled for this year. According to
polls, the AKP party has been steadily gaining popularity. Currently,
it enjoys a substantial lead over its nationalist contender, the CHP.

AKP party leaders may feel they can take a chance with bolder genocide
obfuscation tactics considering such moves are coming at a time of
transforming events in the region, placing such risky foreign policy
moves out of media limelight in Turkey. This is not the case with
citizens of Armenia or its diaspora, who view Turkish moves differently
than official Yerevan. Turkey knows this and modulates its FP moves
associated with genocide denial, highlighting such nuances.

FP moves are based on extracting the maximum benefit from prevailing
conditions. They are not based on right or wrong, good or bad, but
rather on interests. We know the overarching Turkish interest is
deferring accepting responsibility for the crime of genocide.

Armenia should immediately invite the Turkish President, Abdullah
Gul, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and Foreign Minister
Ahmet Davutoglu to attend the April 24th genocide commemoration at
Armenia’s Genocide Memorial at Tsitsernakaberd. Turkey should be given
a specific time limit to respond or the invitation is pulled. The
Turkish delegation can join the hundreds of thousands of Armenians
who gather to commemorate the victims of the 1915 genocide. The
Turkish delegation would be accorded the customary VIP protocol at
the Genocide Museum and attend lectures by prominent scholars. If
Turkey was bluffing, Armenia was not. Armenia thus forces Turkey not
to attend a genocide commemoration in some obscure Armenian community
out of shear embarrassment by refusing this invitation.

There are many scenarios that can be played out. Pretend inferiority
and encourage his arrogance,” wrote Sun Tzu.

From: A. Papazian

http://www.sabah.com.tr/Gundem/2011/02/07/yahudi_acilimindan_sonra_ermeni_acilimi
www.nt.am

Armenian Admitted To Turkish State Cadre

ARMENIAN ADMITTED TO TURKISH STATE CADRE

PanARMENIAN.Net
March 3, 2011 – 14:24 AMT 10:24 GMT

The Turkish government has broken another taboo.

Onboard the plane on its way to Portugal, State Minister and Chief
Negotiator for EU talks Egemen Bagis said that a citizen of Armenian
origin would work in the state cadre. Bagis said a Turkish citizen of
Armenian origin Leo Suren Halepli won the exam for Turkey’s secretariat
general for EU affairs, Hurriyet reported.

Leo Suren Halepli had passed examination of the Secretariat General
for the European Union to be hired as an expert. Later, however, the
Ankara Administrative Court satisfied another contender’s claim to
repeal the examination results, and called for a repeated exam. The
secretariat had appealed the decision in the Turkish Council of State.

A graduate of Endicott University, Robert College and The London
School of Economics, 30-year-old Leo Suren Halepli speaks 5 languages.

From: A. Papazian

Local Medicines Cover Only 10% Of Armenian Market

LOCAL MEDICINES COVER ONLY 10% OF ARMENIAN MARKET

PanARMENIAN.Net
March 3, 2011 – 16:21 AMT 12:21 GMT

Director of Likvor CJSC Sergey Matevosyan said that local medicines
cover 10% of the Armenian pharmaceutical market.

“We should conceive that pharmaceutics is a strategic field and it
should be developed in Armenia,” Matevosyan said after a visit to
the company’s new industrial unit with Armenian Minister of Economy
Tigran Davtyan.

Matevosyan added that Likvor company operates for 20 years and is
the leader in medicines production in the Armenian market. According
to him, 35% of the company’s output is exported to eight countries,
while the new unit’s launch will allow expanding the export volume
and geography.

Matevosyan reported that the new building’s construction started in
September 2009 and the basic construction works are finished.

According to him, the estimated cost of the project makes around
$3.5-4mln, most of which has been already invested.

The emergency response team of the Armenian government approved an
AMD 900mln lax credit to the company in 2009, of which the company
has already received 400mln, while the third tranche at the amount
of AMD 150mln will be transferred soon.

From: A. Papazian

Failed Domestic Rapprochement: RPA Dismisses Ter-Petrosyan’s "Final

FAILED DOMESTIC RAPPROCHEMENT: RPA DISMISSES TER-PETROSYAN’S “FINAL WARNING”

03.03.11

President Serzh Sargsyan (in the center) last month signed a memorandum
with his junior coalition partners to consolidate his power

Reviving the notorious phrase popularized during the failed
rapprochement attempts between Armenia and Turkey, the spokesman for
the ruling Republican Party of Armenia (RPA) said on Wednesday that
the regime of President Serzh Sargsyan would only consider dialogue
with former president Levon Ter-Petrosyan’s opposition bloc if talks
were tendered “without preconditions”.

RPA spokesman Eduard Sharmazanov quite predictably rejected a 15-point
list of demands read out by Ter-Petrosyan at Tuesday’s mass opposition
rally, among which was a call for the resignation of Prime Minister
Tigran Sargsyan and other senior officials, and a call for early
parliamentary elections (due May 2012).

Enlarge Photo Opposition leader Levon Ter-Petrosyan presented a list
of demands to the Sargsyan administration to comply with until March
15Ter-Petrosyan, leader of the Armenian National Congress (ANC), has
warned of a public revolt, unless authorities agree to “a considerable
part” of his demands by March 15.

Sharmazanov dismissed the opposition ultimatum as campaign bluster.

“I think they [the ANC] themselves know very well that setting
deadlines, talking with ultimatums is not the way to go and has nothing
to do with dialogue,” Sharmazanov told RFE/RL’s Armenian service,
adding that the ruling coalition (including Prosperous Armenia Party
and Rule of Law party) would only negotiate with the opposition
“without preconditions.”

“If you want any positive change in your country, if your intentions
are honest, you have to embark on constructive dialogue, rather than
present ultimatums and deadlines to the authorities,” Sharmazanov said.

Countering RPA’s dismissal of his party’s demands, ANC spokesman
Levon Zurabyan likened the situation to the recent overthrow of the
government of Egypt.

“As you remember, (Egypt’s deposed President Hosni) Mubarak
too initially spoke very defiantly. He too said he is rejecting
ultimatums. But in the end, he had to cave in,” he said.

ANC has scheduled another rally for March 17, during which it says
the government’s reply to Ter-Petrosyan’s “final warning” will be
discussed.

From: A. Papazian

http://www.armenianow.com/news/politics/28024/republican_party_dismisses_terpetrosyan_conditions

MP Bakhshyan Remains Hospitalized After Police Scuffle

MP BAKHSHYAN REMAINS HOSPITALIZED AFTER POLICE SCUFFLE
Grisha Balasanyan

hetq
[ 2011/03/03 | 15:46 ]

Heritage Party MP Anahit Bakhshyan is still in hospital after
becoming ill during a scuffle this morning with police in front of
the Government Building in Yerevan.

Fellow Heritage MP Zaruhie Postanjyan reports that Bakhshyan’s blood
pressure is high and doctors have yet been unable to get it down to
acceptable levels.

“It all started when police surrounded us in a circle and started to
close in. This is when Anahit Bakhshyan became ill,” MP Postanjyan
said.

After the encounter, during which police used force to push back
former street vendors protesting the recent ban against all sidewalk
commerce, Heritage Party MP’s Stepan Safaryan and Armen Martirosyan
met with Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan.

The prime minister told them he would order Police Chief Alik Sargsyan
to launch an investigation into the matter.

From: A. Papazian

PM Called Anahit Bakhshyan To Make Sure That She’s Feeling Allright.

PM CALLED ANAHIT BAKHSHYAN TO MAKE SURE THAT SHE’S FEELING ALLRIGHT.

yerkir.am
14:40 – 03.03.2011

MPs of parliamentary “Inheritance” fraction Styopa Safaryan and
Armen Martirosyan demanded Prime Minister to bring to accountability
the policemen and leading officials like deputy head of Municipal
Administration Robert Melqonyan and lieutenant colonel Khachik
Avetisyan.

“Of course, it won’t be correct saying that PM shared our opinion,
but called the police chief and ordered to appoint investigation and
announce the results to the public.

Minutes ago, as we understood, minister of Justice and deputy chief of
police were invited for consultation, and I believe that the subject
of discussion is today’s incident.

PM called Anahit Bakhshyan to make sure that she’s feeling allright.

I have warned PM that if he doesn’t take measures of punishment,
the I will take legal actions.”, announced Styopa Safaryan coming
out of the governmental building.

Styopa Safaryan believes that Armenia could make use of Georgia’s
example, which is dissolving whole police system, getting rid of
notorious employees and traditions.

From: A. Papazian

Which Are The Reasons Of The Revolutionary Wave In The Arab World?

WHICH ARE THE REASONS OF THE REVOLUTIONARY WAVE IN THE ARAB WORLD?
Lusine Vasilyan

“Radiolur”
03.03.2011 16:58

Which are the reasons of the wave of revolutions in the Arab world
and what geopolitical developments can follow?

According to the Rector of the Yerevan State Linguistic University,
political scientist Suren Zolyan, there are at least three main
reasons for the developments in the Arab world. The first is the
idea of formation of a Large Middle East suggested by the American
analysts. The second reason is the existence of grave social problems
in the countries of South Africa, which could not be solved because
of the lack of political and civil systems. The third reason is the
general colonial heritage of those countries.

As for the possible repercussions of these developments for the South
Caucasus, Zolyan considers that Azerbaijan is under threat. “Both
Georgia and Armenia are more traditional and stable as regards their
culture than the newly crated countries of the Middle East. Instead,
the political scientist advises not to underestimate the importance
of social problems.

Despite outer interference and the impact of other factors, the
revolutionary wave would be impossible without social problems.

From: A. Papazian