A Culture’s History Written in Thread

A Culture’s History Written in Thread

By SUSANNE FOWLER
Published: March 30, 2011

ISTANBUL – It began with a question 13 years ago from the owner of a
shop in the Grand Bazaar. The answer has led two American researchers
to conduct the first detailed study of rarely seen sacred treasures
belonging to the Armenian Patriarchate of Istanbul and to the creation
of an underground museum to house the priceless artifacts.

Textiles Reveal Women’s Unheralded Role in Armenian Church

In their 397-page book, `Splendor & Pageantry: Textile Treasures from
the Orthodox Churches of Istanbul,’ Ronald T. Marchese, Marlene R.
Breu and the Armenian Patriarchate expand what little was known about
the unheralded role of women in the church and colorfully record the
skills of women artisans who stitched their devotion onto luscious
silks and velvets.

The objects they studied, some more than 300 years old, include
sumptuously embroidered liturgical vestments, silk altar curtains,
velvet copes decorated with gold or silver threads and pearl-encrusted
miters, gathered from churches that served the Armenian population.
Common embroidery motifs included stars, birds, vine leaves and
angels, their faces sometimes sewn using human hair.

The museum itself houses such textiles as well as paintings and
objects of precious metals from Armenian churches throughout Turkey
which can be viewed, by appointment only, in the basement museum of
the patriarchate in the humble Kumkapi neighborhood of Istanbul. The
museum, created with donations from local Armenians and the European
Capital of Culture 2010 organization, sits atop centuries-old ruins,
discovered during renovations after the 1999 earthquake, that have
since become a chapel.

Mr. Marchese, a professor of ancient history and archaeology at the
University of Minnesota at Duluth, was conducting other research in
Turkey in 1998 `when a good Armenian friend that I have known for over
25 years, Mr. Murat Bilir, approached me one day to ask if I would be
interested in examining religious textiles at a church in the old
Armenian quarter.

`Mr. Bilir knew Payel Gulludere, the then-chairman of the board of
directors of the church, who wanted to know what was in the storage
depot and who made them,’ he said.

`The first piece I examined,’ Mr. Marchese said during an interview by
e-mail, `was a brilliant blue silk cloth, embroidered with an image of
Mary and the Christ Child.’ Impressed by the objects’ workmanship,
iconography and the dedication inscriptions, which helped to date the
textiles, Mr. Marchese contacted Ms. Breu, who examined the objects
the following year.

Then, with the blessing of Patriarch Mesrob II, the researchers began
to `record the brilliance of the material and put a `face’ on the
unknown artisans who created a phenomenal body of material culture,
from the monumental to the miniature,’ Mr. Marchese said.

Ms. Breu, retired professor of textile studies at Western Michigan
University in Kalamazoo, said during an e-mail interview that `what we
didn’t know at the outset was the great depth and breadth of the
material – brilliant artifacts of great historical and artistic value.

`Archbishop Aram Atesyan had already begun archiving the artifacts in
the various Armenian Orthodox Churches in the city. He became our
guide, teacher and good friend through the long and arduous process of
identifying, selecting, collecting, studying, photographing and
archiving.

`Our adventures,’ she said, `took us on ferries, buses, taxis and
hikes, often with frustration resulting from inadequate maps for
finding the churches on both the European and Asian sides of the city.
We visited treasuries, often in the far reaches of church buildings,
met church members, most of whom were excited to learn we were
studying their precious objects. Sometimes we had to leave behind
spectacular pieces because of our inability to gain access for a
variety of reasons.’ Some items, for example, were preserved behind
glass and could not be disturbed without damaging them.

The earlier pieces, Mr. Marchese said, `provide a link with an older
tradition that doesn’t survive except in examples expressed in more
concrete forms – like wall paintings, frescos, mosaics.’

`We were struck by the anatomical accuracy of the Crucifixion, the
stretched muscles of Christ depicted on the cross were accurate,’ he
said. `The artisan captured such scenes in a sensitive display of
emotion and passion – but in miniature’

According to Ms. Breu: `The most significant piece in terms of skill
level is a miter dated 1800.

`The embroiderer used a wide variety of yarn types and stitches,’ she
said. `The workmanship is so fine that the face of the centurion
watching in amazement at the resurrection of Christ is created in a
three-by-two-centimeter area,’ or six square centimeters, which is
less than one square inch.

`The face is executed in smooth silk floss offset against the heavier
textural quality of the surrounding metal, with detail so exacting as
to depict wrinkled skin and single strands of facial hair,’ Ms. Breu
added.

In another very detailed miter, Mary is framed with pearls as she
stands on a serpent with an apple in its mouth.

`I have always wondered what the women of this great geography were
doing as their men designed and built the magnificent monuments and
fought in the many wars waged on these lands,’ said Nancy Ozturk,
coordinator of Citlembik, which published the book. `And now a bit of
this puzzle has been solved.’

`The congregations, mostly illiterate at the time, `read’ the Gospel
stories through the images on the cloth and were awestruck – as we are
– by the richness of the silk cloth, the colorful embroidery and the
generous use of precious jewels,’ she said.

Ornate textiles are still being used in church services, often the
only place people could get glimpses of them. `But many are
irreplaceable,’ said Father Tatoul Anoushian during a recent tour of
the five-room museum. `The church established two girls’ schools in
the 1820s just for this kind of work. But unfortunately we haven’t got
anyone now with the skills needed to produce new ones.’

More than 70 churches served the Armenian Christian population of
Istanbul at the beginning of the 20th century, but only about 30
survive, the researchers say, as the cultural heart of a population
decimated by the genocide – a term disputed by Turkey – that began in
during World War I.

It is rare to find such a trove of cloth-based items that merit study.
`Textile objects, because of their ephemeral nature, do not last long,
especially when they are used, as they were in the Celebration of the
Divine Liturgy,’ Ms. Breu said. Many other examples were destroyed by
the many fires that plagued Istanbul and its wooden buildings over the
centuries.

`The importance of textile objects is often minimized because they
come from a tradition of `women’s work’ usually associated with the
home,’ Ms. Breu said. `But these objects illustrate the skill and
devotion of Armenian women to their church. It offered them a means of
self-expression in the public sector and of participation in their
religious rituals.’

Some of the more fascinating items include the oldest dated miter from
1681, another that lacks a date but is believed to be about a century
older, and a pair of liturgical slippers intricately adorned on the
soles with images of a scorpion and a snake, a sort of final barrier
between the priest and evil temptations. There are also tunic collars
for choir members, veils for covering the chalice, banners, crowns,
canopies, cases for patriarchal staffs, altar curtains and kerchiefs
for the handling of crosses.

`It was truly a labor of love,’ Ms. Breu said, `with the usual
difficulties and delights, but with immeasurable rewards.’

Not the least of these, she said, was adding to `the empowerment of
Istanbul Armenians to celebrate their important past.’

A version of this article appeared in print on March 31, 2011, in The
International Herald Tribune.

From: A. Papazian

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/31/world/europe/31iht-M31-armenian.html?src=twrhp

Yerevan Press Club Weekly Newsletter – 03/31/2011

YEREVAN PRESS CLUB WEEKLY NEWSLETTER

MARCH 25-31, 2011

HIGHLIGHTS:

YPC WEEKLY NEWSLETTER AND WEBSITE REPORT FOR 2010

“E-CLUB” CYCLE: INTERNET AND E-VOTING

RA NATIONAL ASSEMBLY MP GOES TO LAW WITH “YERKIR” DAILY

FREEDOM OF SPEECH DAY CELEBRATED IN GYUMRI FOR THE THIRD TIME

“ARAVOT” PRESENTED THE WINNERS OF COMPETITIONS FOR YEREVAN TV CHANNELS AND
STARTED A NEW ARTICLE SERIES

ARMENIAN JOURNALISTS NAMED “THE BEST IN PROFESSION”

YPC WEEKLY NEWSLETTER AND WEBSITE REPORT FOR 2010

In compliance with Article 12 “Transparency of financial sources” of the RA
Law “On Mass Communication”, we present the 2010 financial report of Yerevan
Press Club Weekly Newsletter and the website

In 2010, a total of 4,106,000 AMD was spent for the publication of YPC
Weekly Newsletter and the support of the website in the
English and Russian languages.

The whole sum was covered by a grant provided by Open Society
Foundations-Armenia.

According to the RA Law “On Public Organizations”, the report on financial
activities of Yerevan Press Club for 2010 is placed on YPC website
in the “Structure” section.

“E-CLUB” CYCLE: INTERNET AND E-VOTING

On March 29 another program from “E-Club” weekly cycle went on the online
broadcast of “A1+” TV company (). The “E-Club” is produced by
Yerevan Press Club in cooperation with “A1+” TV company under “Alternative
Resources in Media” project, supported by USAID.

The information and education blocs, particularly, dealt with the new
application of “With Your Own Eyes”, the results of the spring
online school olympiad, held by “Mkhitar Sebastatsi” Educational Center, and
the competition for creating the website logo of the US Embassy in Armenia,
announced on Facebook. One of the plots regarded the most popular online
topics for the previous week – the political starvation action of Raffi
Hovhannisian, Chairman of “Heritage” party, at the Liberty Square of
Yerevan, and the victory of the best chess player of Armenia Levon Aronian
at the International Chess Tournament of Monte Carlo. The guests of the
discussion part of “E-Club” – Avetik Ishkhanian, Chairman of Helsinki
Committee of Armenia, and Abram Bakhchagulian, Secretary of Central
Electoral Commission, considered the opportunities of holding an e-voting in
Armenia as a means of enhancing the voters’ trust towards the elections.

The next “E-Club” will be aired on “A1+” on April 5.

RA NATIONAL ASSEMBLY MP GOES TO LAW WITH “YERKIR” DAILY

On March 25 the court of general jurisdiction of Kentron and Nork-Marash
administrative districts of Yerevan started hearing the suit of Tigran
Arzakantsian, RA National Assembly MP, member of “Republican Party of
Armenia” faction, versus “‘Yerkir’ Editorial Office” LLC – founder and
publisher of “Yerkir” daily. The reason of the suit became the piece about
Tigran Arzakantsian, appeared in “Yerkir” on January 13, 2011 within the
column “131 Faces and the Masks” (the given cycle presents the Armenian MPs
in alphabetical order). Tigran Arzakantsian had sent a refutation text to
the newspaper, and since it was not published, he went to law. The plaintiff
demands to refute the information discrediting his honor and dignity, oblige
the daily to publish the court decision on the case, exact 3 million AMD
(about $ 8,200) from the defendant as a compensation for libel and
defamation, as well as compensate the court expenses of 568,000 AMD.

At the session of March 25 the party of the plaintiff specified the
contested words and expressions in the piece, assessed as libel or
defamation.

On March 26 “Yerkir”, upon its own initiative, stored an editorial on the
front page, entitled “Refutation”. The daily refuted the words and
expressions that insulted the MP. The editorial ended with a question: “Did
you believe?”

The next court session is appointed on April 11.

FREEDOM OF SPEECH DAY CELEBRATED IN GYUMRI FOR THE THIRD TIME

On March 25, the Freedom of Speech Day was celebrated in “October” cinema of
Gyumri. The event was organized by “Asparez” Journalists Club of Gyumri and
was marked in the second Armenian biggest town for already the third year.
On this occasion four media representatives received memorable gifts: Anush
Martirosian, correspondent of Radio “Free Europe”/Radio “Liberty” Armenian
Service – for covering human rights issues; Inga Zarafian, President of
“EcoLur” news NGO – for prompt coverage of environmental issues and
contribution to ; Satenik Vantsian, correspondent of Radio
“Free Europe”/Radio “Liberty” Armenian Service – for covering issues on
protection of social interests; Larisa Paremuzian, correspondent of “Hetq”
online publication – for achievements in investigative journalism.

The Freedom of Speech Day was found in 2009 to mark the settlement of the
situation with “GALA” TV company of Gyumri: the payment of tax liability by
founder of “GALA”, “CHAP” LLC, which almost put the TV company on the verge
of closing down. The funds for repaying the debt were donated by individuals
and organizations, both Armenian and international. The tax inspections at
“CHAP” LLC and the following lawsuits started, as soon as, on October 22,
2007, the “CHAP” owner Vahan Khachatrian announced about the attempts of
various power agencies to exert pressure on “GALA”.

“ARAVOT” PRESENTED THE WINNERS OF COMPETITIONS FOR YEREVAN TV CHANNELS AND
STARTED A NEW ARTICLE SERIES

“Aravot” daily continues the article series which examine the applications
of the digital broadcast competition winners. The applications copies were
provided by National Commission on Television and Radio on the request of
Anna Israelian, the series author and “Aravot” observer.

The pieces of March 25 and 29, 2011 dealt with application of the winner of
competition No.11 (for Yerevan TV channels of international/current affairs
profile) “ArmNews” CJSC – founder of “ArmNews” TV channel. As it has been
reported, in this competition the opponent of “ArmNews” was “A1+” founder,
“Meltex” LLC. On December 16, 2010 the National Commission on Television and
Radio assessed the competition package of “ArmNews” with 44 points, while
“A1+” received 2 points. The NCTR decision on competition No.11 stated that
the financial sources, claimed by “Meltex”, “cannot be considered
sufficient, given that the significant part of the supporting documents on
the financial assistance (…) is forged and unjustified”. Namely, this fact
rendered impossible for “A1+” to implement a complete broadcast in the
digital network in Yerevan, assured the NCTR (see YPC Weekly Newsletter,
December 17-23, 2010).

The series author Anna Israelian explained that while analyzing the
“ArmNews” application she had not used the copy provided by NCTR, but the
facsimile of the whole document package, which was granted to “A1+” founder
by the NCTR in a judicial order (see details in YPC Weekly Newsletter,
January 10-20, 2011). As the series author informed this was stipulated by
the fact that “currently the NCTR considers it inappropriate” to grant the
documents enclosed with the application.

By reminding that NCTR condemned “A1+” founder in having deficient and
obviously forged documents in the application, Anna Israelian stressed that
the application of “ArmNews” also contains “numerous shortcomings and
unconformities”. Particularly, many contracts, concluded between “ArmNews”
and private persons, claimed as correspondents of the TV channel, are not
attested with a signature and a seal. The pieces on competition No.11 are
attended by the photos of some of the contracts. It should be noted that
even the first article of the series on competition No.1 winner, founder of
“Armenia” TV channel (“Armenia TV” CJSC), mentioned about the presence of
the same documents in applications of “ArmNews” and “Armenia”. This,
according to “Aravot”, demonstrates the well-known fact – the companies have
the same assets (see YPC Weekly Newsletter, February 11-17, 2011).

On March 30, 2011 “Aravot” presented the application of the winner of
competition No.15 (for TV channels of Yerevan of general profile) “Shark”
LLC, founder of “Hay TV” channel. Thus, the daily has analyzed all the
applications of the winners of competitions for Yerevan TV channels, except
the ones of No.12, 13 É 14, held for rebroadcasting companies.

Since March 31 “Aravot” started a new article series, “They Will Be
Broadcast in the Regions”, dealing with the broadcast licensing competitions
for regional TV channels of general profile. The first piece of the series
regards the applications of competitions No.16 and 17 – “Tavush” LLC (Tavush
region) and “Fortuna” LLC (Lori region), respectively. The series author
Anna Israelian specifically noted that even though one of the co-owners of
“Tavush” LLC Samvel Sahakian holds the smaller part of the shares, he has
committed to implement a business program and to invest a sizeable sum in
the development of the TV channel. Anna Israelian stressed that the
documents, enclosed with the application, reveal that Samvel Sahakian is the
Executive Director of “Masis Tobacco” company – part of “Grand Holding”
group, owned by the Vardanian family. It is known that the Vardanian family
is the owner of “‘AR’ TV Company” LLC, which won at competition No.10 (for
Yerevan TV channels of youth/educational profile).

ARMENIAN JOURNALISTS NAMED “THE BEST IN PROFESSION”

On March 30 in Moscow at the Central House of Journalists the award ceremony
of the International Journalistic Competition “The Best in Profession” was
held. Among the winners were two Armenian journalists: Gor Grigorian,
correspondent of Radio “Van”, in “The Best Radio Reportage” nomination – for
the radio reportages “Football Reportage”, “A Story about War”, “Letters to
Pushkin”; director Armen Yeritsian in “The Best TV Plot” nomination – for
the documentary “The Last Tightrope Dancer of Armenia”. Another
representative of Armenia was named laureate of the competition: Hayk
Badalian, correspondent of “Photolur” agency, in “The Best Photo Work”
nomination – for the photo “This Is How I Live”. The competition was
organized by the International Confederation of Journalists Unions. One of
the jury members was Boris Navasardian, Yerevan Press Club President.

When reprinting or using the information above, reference to the Yerevan
Press Club is required.

You are welcome to send any comment and feedback about the Newsletter to:
[email protected]

Subscription for the Newsletter is free. To subscribe or unsubscribe from
this mailing list, please send a message to: [email protected]

Editor of YPC Newsletter – Elina POGHOSBEKIAN
____________________________________________
Yerevan Press Club
9B, Ghazar Parpetsi str.
0002, Yerevan, Armenia
Tel.: (+ 374 10) 53 00 67; 53 35 41; 53 76 62
Fax: (+374 10) 53 56 61
E-mail: [email protected]
Web Site:

From: A. Papazian

http://www.ypc.am
http://www.ypc.am
http://ecolur.org
www.ypc.am
www.a1plus.am
www.a1plus.am
www.ypc.am

Chakhtakhtinski: Ruling Regime Has Been Hiding Behind the Karabakh

Elmar Chakhtakhtinski: Ruling Regime Has Been Hiding Behind the
Karabakh Issue For Too Long

WASHINGTON DC. March 30, 2011: Azerireport interviewed Elmar
Chakhtakhtinski, chairman of Azerbaijani Americans for Democracy
(AZAD), to clarify the issues related to AZAD’s recent protest action
in front of the Azerbaijani Embassy to the US and AZAD’s position on a
number of political issues which drew public attention both in the
United States and Azerbaijan.

– On March 19, 2011 AZAD organized `Free Azerbaijan’ rally in front of
Azerbaijani Embassy in Washington, DC.
[]
What was the purpose of the rally and how it was expressed?

– Our main purpose was to express our protest at the continuing
violation by the Aliyev regime of the most elemental rights and
freedoms of Azerbaijani citizens. Several young activists and
journalists have been arrested, reportedly beaten and tortured,
peaceful protesters have been violently attacked by police and
government agents in civilian uniforms.

These repressive policies and uncivilized tactics lead us to the only
possible logical conclusion that the current corrupt dictatorship
ruling Azerbaijan has no intentions to reform and in order for
Azerbaijan to make any real progress on the path to democracy this
regime will simply have to follow the fate of similar authoritarian
governments in Tunisia and Egypt.

The slogans and posters at the rally, as well as the use of satire,
graphics and some humor, typical of protest rallies, reflected these
sentiments.

– The Azerbaijani media and representatives of the government often
state that the main problem facing Azerbaijan is the Karabakh conflict
and that is where the primary focus should be in both the domestic and
international arena. You also used some posters at the rally related
to Karabakh conflict, can you elaborate on that?

– Indeed, the ruling regime has been hiding behind the Karabakh issue
for too long. What we have here is an attempt to use the genuine
tragedy – invasion of native Azerbaijani lands by Armenia – both as a
distraction and a cover for the corruption and repression perpetrated
by the authorities in Baku. To the outside world, they say that the
presence of refugees and Armenian invasion, along with `existing
political mentality’ in Azerbaijani society, impedes the democratic
development. Internally, they use this subject to question the
patriotism of dissidents who `during a war time turn against their own
government’ and thus `aid the enemy’.

I would like to ask this question: how does exactly the presence of
refugees or the prevailing political culture in society lead to the
specific decisions by Ilham Aliyev regime to use force against
peaceful demonstrators or to keep in jail the journalists and
activists? And what the occupation of Azerbaijani territory by Armenia
has to do with the president’s teenage children owning $74 million
dollar villas in Dubai and the ruling family controlling some of the
country’s biggest private banks? If the `political mentality’ is a
culprit in all this – that seems to be the mentality and culture of
the ruling top officials, not the general population.

However, there is some link between the issues of democracy and
Karabakh, but in the exactly opposite cause-and-effect direction from
the one claimed by the Azerbaijani government and its apologists. The
pervasive corruption and lack of democratic governance is the primary
factor that impedes the solution for Karabakh or any other major
problem facing Azerbaijan today. After all, how can the regime, so
corrupt to the core and so disrespectful towards the fundamental
rights of its citizens, be effective in its diplomatic efforts in
front of the world opinion or in building strong economy and military
to defend against foreign aggression?

Therefore, some of our posters reflected this reality: the 18 years of
abusing Karabakh problem for its own self-interest by the Aliyev
regime and failure to produce any tangible progress in diplomatic
negotiations indicates either it’s utter incompetence, at best, or
it’s actual interest in prolongation of this conflict to use it as a
convenient excuse, at worst.

– A director of an Azerbaijani-American organization USAN, Bedir
Memmedli, suggested that you choose different methods of expressing
concerns with the policies of Azerbaijani government and questioned
the sincerity of the participants of this rally due the lack of their
involvement in other Diaspora activities. Can you respond to these
comments?

– AZAD’s leadership always appreciates feedback from the public,
especially from other Azerbaijan-Americans. Of course, AZAD, as an
organization, has a specific purpose and all of its events are related
to its mission: advocating support for democracy in Azerbaijan.
However, Bedir Memmedli’s statement is flat-out wrong: many
participants of our rally have also been involved in other events of
Azerbaijani-American community at numerous occasions.

Many of us, including myself, have participated individually in other
community events such as Khojali commemoration rallies; some
individuals were among the organizers and sponsors of Azerbaijani and
Turkic events in greater Washington area, such as Turkish Festival in
DC or fundraising events for an Azerbaijani-American candidate in
local elections. Some of those who helped to organize AZAD’s `Free
Azerbaijan’ rally also assisted with Azerbaijani Novruz celebrations
just a day earlier, which was attended by about 80 community members.

But the real question is the following: what the participation in the
community events has to do with the topics raised at AZAD’s March 19
rally? Criticism of our protest action based on unrelated and untrue
facts sounds very similar to the distraction tactics of the
Azerbaijani government that I described in the answer to the previous
question. I hope that this is an honest oversight by someone who
claims to share our concerns about the lack of democracy in
Azerbaijan.

It is also very telling that the recommendation made by Mr. Memmedli
is exactly the same as the one given to us by the first secretary of
Azerbaijani Embassy before our first rally in front of the embassy
back in December of 2008: he advised us then to opt for a meeting in
the Azerbaijani Embassy and express our concerns to the embassy staff
inside the embassy, rather than holding public protest action which
can `damage the country’s reputation’. Again, I hope these parallels
between the USAN director’s statements and the position of an
Azerbaijani government representative are only unfortunate
coincidences.

I would also like to add that if the representatives of the
Azerbaijani Embassy in DC or any other Azeri government officials
would like to discuss the issue of democracy and human rights with
AZAD, we would gladly welcome such an invitation. In fact,
representatives of the embassy were invited to AZAD’s April 16, 2010
forum on the role of democracy in the US-Azerbaijani relations but
chose not to attend. However, any such meetings and discussion can not
be seen as a substitute for public protest actions to express our
concerns and raise awareness about these topics (Azerireport).

From: A. Papazian

http://azerireport.com/index.php?option=com_frontpage&Itemid=1
http://azerireport.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2675&Itemid=42

Ethnic Armenian In Turkey Rejects Diplomatic Post

ETHNIC ARMENIAN IN TURKEY REJECTS DIPLOMATIC POST

Greek Reporter

March 30 2011

Turkish Foreign Ministry offered a post to Daron Acemoglu as the
country’s permanent representative to the Paris-based Organization
for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). News sources first
claimed he would be appointed as Turkish ambassador to France,
but Foreign Minister Davutoglu, in his press conference yesterday
corrected that mistake without naming names.

Acemoglu, a Turkish/Armenian and a prominent economist and academician
has rejected the offer noting that his academic career has priority
over political inspirations.

Critics see the offer as an act to save face against allegations
of mistreatment of minorities in Turkey. Government spokespersons
claim they want to normalize relations with Armenia in accordance
with Turkey’s so called “zero conflict” policy with her neighbors.

Daron Acemoglu is currently Professor of Applied Economics at
Massachusetts Institute of Technology and winner of the 2005 John
Bates Clark Medal. He is said to be a good candidate for a future
Nobel prize in economics.

Although there are no restrictions in law, minorities in Turkey were
never appointed to official posts by the state since 1950â~@²s and
could not held public office. There was never a minority Member of
Parliament nor a high level public servant since then.

From: A. Papazian

http://eu.greekreporter.com/2011/03/30/ethnic-armenian-in-turkey-rejects-diplomatic-post/

Unusual Ruling for Academic Freedom

Inside Higher Ed

Unusual Ruling for Academic Freedom

March 31, 2011

A federal judge on Wednesday rejected a lawsuit against the University
of Minnesota over the website of one of its centers — and the right of
that center to deem another website “unreliable.”

At one level the suit focused on history and the dispute over why so
many Armenians were killed during World War I. But more broadly, the
case involved two competing claims of academic freedom.

The website of Minnesota’s Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies
makes clear that its faculty members believe (consistent with the
consensus view of historians) that what happened to the Armenians was a
genocide. Many Turkish groups disagree, and the suit was sparked by the
university’s labeling of the information on the Turkish Coalition of
America’s website as “unreliable.” The group sued, arguing that the
label amounted to an unfair endorsement by the university of a specific
position — and that doing so discouraged students and faculty members
from asserting other points of view, in violation of the principles of
academic freedom.

Judge Donovan W. Frank found that academic freedom issues were central
to the case — but he sided with the University of Minnesota, which
argued that its faculty members had the right to express their views on
the genocide center’s website — including views criticizing websites
that argue against the certainty of an Armenian genocide.

“The court concludes that this case is properly viewed in the context of
academic freedom and that defendants’ statements are protected by that
freedom,” Judge Frank wrote. “The CHGS [the genocide studies center] is
free to indicate to students that it thinks certain websites are not
proper sources for scholarly research. The ability of the university and
its faculty to determine the reliability of sources available to
students to use in their research falls squarely within the university’s
freedom to determine how particular coursework shall be taught. The CHGS
also acknowledges their viewpoint that the killing of Ottoman Armenians
during World War I was genocide. This viewpoint, as well, is within the
purview of the university’s academic freedom to comment on and critique
academic views held and expressed by others.”

Mark B. Rotenberg, general counsel for Minnesota, said that the ruling
was unusual in that it was decided strictly on the issue of academic
freedom. Many federal court rulings, he noted, refer to academic freedom
but are based in the end on the First Amendment, due process or other
legal rights.

“We see this as a highly significant federal decision involving academic
freedom, since there are so few cases that are decided squarely on the
principle of academic freedom,” he said.

Rotenberg said that, had the Turkish Coalition of America been
successful, the ramifications could have extended well beyond Minnesota
or scholars of the Armenian genocide. Any time that faculty members or a
research center shared views that others might contest, a university
could have been at risk of being sued, he said. Instead, a federal judge
has affirmed that “faculties don’t have to be completely neutral in
expressing their views of others’ scholarly writing, and that they can
have a perspective that advocates one academic perspective over
another…. This is a very important vindication for academic freedom.”

Bruce Fein, one of the lawyers for the Turkish Coalition of America,
said that the group was still studying the decision and had not decided
whether to appeal. Fein said that the judge “did not address the
substance of our arguments” and seemed to accept the University of
Minnesota’s claims about its views of academic freedom. Fein said that,
in his view, “academic freedom was a pretense in trying to indoctrinate
rather than educate.” He said that, in the name of academic freedom, the
university was trying “to impose an orthodoxy.”

The university and its defenders have responded by saying that Minnesota
has never banned anyone from doing research or expressing ideas such as
those of the Turkish Coalition with regard to what happened to the
Armenians. But that does not mean, Minnesota has argued, that its
faculty members and research centers can’t express a view on the issue.

Several scholarly associations — the International Association of
Genocide Scholars, the Middle East Studies Association and the Society
for Armenian Studies — opposed the suit.

In a public letter to the coalition, the Middle East studies group said:
“Your organization, and those who hold perspectives different from those
expressed by scholars associated with the Center, certainly have the
right to participate in open scholarly exchange on the history of the
Armenians in the late Ottoman Empire or any other issue, by presenting
their views at academic conferences, in the pages of peer-reviewed
scholarly journals or by other means, thereby opening them up to debate
and challenge. We are distressed that you instead chose to take legal
action against the University of Minnesota and its Center for Holocaust
and Genocide Studies, apparently for having at one point characterized
views expressed on your website in a certain way. We fear that legal
action of this kind may have a chilling effect on the ability of
scholars and academic institutions to carry out their work freely and to
have their work assessed on its merits, in conformity with standards and
procedures long established in the world of scholarship. Your lawsuit
may thus serve to stifle the free expression of ideas among scholars and
academic institutions regarding the history of Armenians in the later
Ottoman Empire, and thereby undermine the principles of academic
freedom.”

– Scott Jaschik

From: A. Papazian

http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2011/03/31/judge_rejects_suit_against_u_of_minnesota_over_website_on_genocide

AGBU YP LA and Armenian Assembly of America Hold Talk on Genocide

AGBU Press Office
55 East 59th Street
New York, NY 10022-1112
Phone: 212.319.6383, x118
Fax: 212.319.6507
Email: [email protected]
Website:

PRESS RELEASE

Thursday, March 31, 2011

AGBU Young Professionals of Los Angeles and Armenian Assembly of America
Hold Talk on Genocide

On March 27, 2011, the AGBU Young Professionals of Los Angeles (YPLA) —
in a joint effort with the Armenian Assembly of America — embarked on a
public campaign to educate the mainstream community on the first
holocaust of the 20th century. This event came in anticipation of the
upcoming 96th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide, which will be on
April 24, 2011. A talk took place with residents of the Coachella
Valley, fostering a discussion on the present U.S. government’s policy
of complacency in recognizing the Armenian Genocide and in debunking the
Turkish government’s continued denial of one of the greatest crimes in
human history against the Armenian people.

YPLA chair Yeghig Keshishian led a discussion on the Armenian Genocide,
held at the Tolerance Education Center in Rancho Mirage. The two-hour
event included excerpts from the movie Screamers, featuring the band
System of the Down. The Tolerance Education Center Director of
Operations, Melisse Banwer, invited Keshishian and Assembly Southern
California Regional Council Member Margaret Mgrublian to educate the
audience of high school students and concerned citizens alike on
history’s forgotten, if not often ignored, genocide of the 20th century.
Present in the audience was Joyce Stein, a member of the Assembly Board
of Trustees. Banwer commented, “This was our most successful event to
date! It was successful in terms of favorable comments from attendees,
the lively and poignant audience participation, as well as the number of
people who walked away from the event with a new understanding and
knowledge of the Armenian Genocide.”

Keshishian also stated, “For Americans of Armenian descent, April is a
time we – as a nation – commemorate the victims of the Armenian Genocide
and share our human experience with all victims of genocides past in
anticipation of Genocide Awareness Month. Only through our shared human
experiences can we impart upon the youth the lessons we have learned
from our own personal history and survival as told by our ancestors.”

Established in 1906, AGBU () is the world’s largest
non-profit Armenian organization. Headquartered in New York City, AGBU
preserves and promotes the Armenian identity and heritage through
educational, cultural and humanitarian program, annually touching the
lives of some 400,000 Armenians around the world.

For more information about AGBU and its worldwide programs, please visit

From: A. Papazian

www.agbu.org
www.agbu.org
www.agbu.org.

Russian Expert Says No War In Karabakh

RUSSIAN EXPERT SAYS NO WAR IN KARABAKH

news.am
March 30 2011
Armenia

Although Azerbaijan’s military budget is ten times larger than the
Armenian one, although Azerbaijan threatens to resume hostilities in
Nagorno-Karabakh, it will never do it, Russian expert told Armenian
News-NEWS.am.

Anatoly Tsiganok, Head of the Russia-based Military Forecast Center,
Azerbaijan’s oil facilities will be first under attack in case
hostilities resume. In this case Azerbaijan will find itself in a
difficult situation.

Presently, Europe gets a lot of oil benefits from Azerbaijan, and
it will hardly allow resumption of war, as it will be extremely
undesirable for the EU. Meanwhile, the U.S. does not need another
problem in the South Caucasus and is not interested in it, the
expert said.

Armenia is also Moscow’s strategic partner. As to Azerbaijan-Russia
relations, the countries are involved in joint oil industry and
division of the Caspian Sea. This accounts for current good relations
of Russia with both states, Tsiganok added.

All this only indicates one thing: status quo in the conflict zone
is beneficial to all, except for Armenia and Azerbaijan.

Political expert pointed to a rather complicated scheme of security
prevailing in the South Caucasus. “On the one hand, there is CSTO with
its members – Armenia and Russia, on the other – NATO with Georgia
and Azerbaijan striving to join the alliance,” he said adding that
mixture of these interests does not suggest a great likelihood of
war resumption.

From: A. Papazian

Armenian, Iranian Presidents Discuss Construction Of Iran-Armenia Ra

ARMENIAN, IRANIAN PRESIDENTS DISCUSS CONSTRUCTION OF IRAN-ARMENIA RAILWAY

news.am
March 28 2011
Armenia

On March 27, Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan met with his Iranian
counterpart Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in Tehran.

The officials discussed issues on improvement of bilateral cooperation
during the meeting, the presidential press service informed Armenian
News-NEWS.am.

Serzh Sargsyan congratulated the Iranian President on Novruz holiday
on behalf of himself and Armenian people.

The Presidents discussed issues on development of bilateral mutually
beneficial cooperation and improvement of good neighborly relations.

They attached significance to the developing cooperation in the spheres
of energy, transportation, culture and other fields. The sides also
discussed the project on construction of Iran-Armenia railway.

Serzh Sargsyan also participated in the ceremonies dedicated to
Novruz holiday.

From: A. Papazian

Turkish Writer Orhan Pamuk Fined For The Phrase "Turks Killed 1 Mill

TURKISH WRITER ORHAN PAMUK FINED FOR THE PHRASE “TURKS KILLED 1 MILLION ARMENIANS”

news.am
March 28 2011
Armenia

Famous Turkish writer and Nobel laureate Orhan Pamuk must pay a
compensation of 6, 000 liras (U.S. $ 4,000) for the phrase “Turks
killed 1 million Armenians,” by the Turkish court’s decision.

The writer was sued in 2005 by five people, including ultra-nationalist
lawyer Kemal Kerincsiz, as well as four other people who are relatives
of soldiers killed in action. Pamuk has 15 days to appeal the court
decision, according to the legal procedures.

In 2005, after Pamuk made a statement regarding the mass killings of
Armenians and Kurds in the Ottoman Empire, a criminal case was opened
against him based on a complaint filed by ultra-nationalist lawyer
Kemal Kerincsiz. Kerincsiz appealed to the Supreme Court of Appeal
which ordered the court in Sisli to re-open the case. On March 27,
2011, Pamuk was found guilty and ordered to pay 6,000 liras in total
compensation to five people.

As reported earlier, in an interview with a Swiss newspaper in 2005,
Pamuk said that Turks killed 1 million Armenians and 30, 000 Kurds
in 1915.

A month ago, Pamuk repeated his words in an interview with a Greek
newspaper.

From: A. Papazian

Turkish Premier’s Aircraft Makes Emergency Landing

TURKISH PREMIER’S AIRCRAFT MAKES EMERGENCY LANDING

news.am
March 28 2011
Armenia

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s aircraft made an
emergency landing on Sunday, Vatan newspaper repots.

Recep Tayyip Erdogan got on “Anna” plane at the “Sabiha Gokcen”
airport to fly to Kahramanmaras. But shortly after takeoff, the plane
was forced to make an emergency landing at Esenboga airport in Ankara
due to danger of crash.

After waiting some time at the airport Erdogan and Turkish Energy
Minister Taner Yildiz, Industry Minister Nihat Ergun, Education
Minister Nimet Cubukcu, Tourism Minister Ertugrul Gunay and Ecology
Minister Veysel Eroglu flew to Kahramanmaras by DAP airplane.

From: A. Papazian