20TH CENTURY MASS KILLINGS REMEMBERED
Submitted by Mike O’Sullivan on April 18, 2011
Two of the worst atrocities of the 20th century started in the month of
April: the killing of 1.5 million Armenians in Ottoman Empire Turkey
in 1915 and 1916, and the slaughter of 800,000 Tutsis and moderate
Hutus in Rwanda in 1994. Scholars and survivors say the process of
healing is not easy.
Donald Miller, who directs the Center for Religion and Civic Culture at
the University of Southern California, interviewed Armenian survivors
in the 1970s and ’80s. He also has collected the stories of those
orphaned and widowed by the Rwanda massacre.
He said several themes emerge from the interviews, most recently in
Rwanda. “One thing is that forgiveness is extremely difficult. And in
our experience of doing 100 interviews, that is the exceptional case.
In fact, what we found is that some individuals are so traumatized that
they may say that they have forgiven the perpetrators of this genocide,
but they say so almost with a spirit of resignation in their voice,
as if, ‘we have no other choice,'” said Miller.
He said that in Rwanda there is an effort is to bring about
reconciliation through community courts, where perpetrators ask for
forgiveness and the victims generally give it. He said it is often
not clear, however, that the forgiveness is heartfelt.
The killings in Armenia took place in connection with forced
deportations of the Armenian Christian minority in the largely Muslim
Ottoman Empire. Historian Richard Hovannisian of the University of
California, Los Angeles, recalls that it started in the imperial
capital.
“In April, 1915, the Armenian intellectual, political, religious
leaders in Constantinople were arrested, deported and most of them
killed. And then followed in the following months, the mass deportation
and massacres of Armenians throughout the Ottoman Empire through forced
marches, outright killing of the male population, forced marches of
the woman and children,” said Hovannisian. “And the place of so-called
relocation, for those who made it – not many did, but those who did –
were the deserts.”
In the documentary The River Ran Red from the Armenian Film Foundation,
a survivor tells about his experience. The interview was recorded in
1985, and the man recalled what he witnessed as a child.
“In the morning, I walked and walked. I saw a boy. Together, we found a
girl and we hid in the forest. We saw the Turks looking for Armenians
in forest. At night, they would massacre the men. During the day,
the women and the boys. We were lying down in the blood. We woke up
among the dead.”
The events occurred after the Ottomans entered World War I, and Turkey
still insists there were civilian deaths on all sides in the confusion
of war. It says Armenians were deported from the Eastern war zone
because of fear of unrest and concerns that the Armenian minority
could aid the enemy, Russia. Turkey also disputes the numbers, saying
no more than 600,000 Armenians died, and not by intent.
Hovannisian said the question remains politically sensitive because
of the strategic importance of Turkey as a bridge to the Muslim world.
“Some would prefer to avoid it. For example, President Obama, who as
candidate Obama insisted one of the first things he would do would be
to acknowledge the Armenian genocide, has skirted the issue by using
an Armenian term, which is the equivalent of genocide, but does not
say genocide. It is the Armenian word [Meds] Yeghern, which means
the Great Crime, the Great Event, the Great Tragedy, rather than
the word itself. So it does not make the Turkish government happy,
but on the other hand, it is not the G-word.”
The historian notes that President Woodrow Wilson condemned the
massacre at the time it happened, and Wilson’s ambassador to the
Ottoman Empire, Henry Morgenthau, would call it the murder of a nation.
The Rwanda genocide began April 6, 1994, when ethnic tensions flared
after the assassination of Rwanda president Juvenal Habyarimana,
who was an ethnic Hutu. The Hutu power movement then targeted Tutsis
for elimination.
Yvette Rugasaguhunga, a Tutsi, survived the Rwanda massacre. Now
a financial analyst in New York, she has been living in the United
States for seven years.
She recalls that on the third day of the genocide, her father was
killed. “My father was lucky enough to be shot. He was taken inside
of a home. They shot him in front of my grandmother, who begged them
to kill her as well, and they shot her,” said Rugasaguhunga.
The same day, her 22-year old brother was caught and killed by
clubbing. She would lose another brother and two sisters in the
killings.
Ironically, Yvette and her sisters were shielded by a neighboring
Hutu family, and were later sheltered by a Hutu militiaman who was
unaware of their ethnic background. She said the man was loving and
warm in his dealings with the girls, but returned home each day from
the killings covered in blood.
“And to me, that is something that I can never completely comprehend,”
she said. “What it taught me is, any human being can be evil, and
any human being can be an angel.”
Religion scholar Donald Miller said these were Christians killing
Christians, and some churchmen were involved.
“In fact, one survivor that I interviewed said that his own Catholic
priest refused to serve him communion, or the Eucharist, because he
said, ‘I do not give the body and blood of Christ to cockroaches.’ And
so when you identify someone as a cockroach or in the case of the
Armenian genocide as an infidel, they become less than human, and
there is then a campaign to exterminate these individuals who do not
have the same social and civil rights as the rest of the population.”
Miller said that modern technology, including the use of mass media to
motivate the killers, made the 20th century a century of genocides,
from Armenia and the Nazi Holocaust to Rwanda. Mass killings in
Cambodia, Darfur and Southern Sudan have added other atrocities to
the tragic list.
Rugasaguhunga said reconciliation in Rwanda must begin with justice.
She noted that the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda has
completed barely 50 trials, and she hopes for the prosecution of more
of the ringleaders.
Hovannisian said that acknowledging the crime is a crucial first
step to reconciliation, and he said that in Turkey’s case, that has
not happened.
From: A. Papazian
http://lincolntribune.com/?p=9847