Sport In Armenia Isn’t That Popular Than It Was, Says Minister

SPORT IN ARMENIA ISN’T THAT POPULAR THAN IT WAS, SAYS MINISTER

Tert.am
01.07.11

Armenia’s minister of sport and youth affairs has said sport is not
that popular in the country than it used to be in the Soviet era.

In an interview with the ministry’s website, Arthur Petrosyan said that
sport is the “guarantee of health and fighting spirit of Armenians”.

“In my youth people would not ask ‘do you go in for sports?’ but
would ask ‘what kind of sports do you go in for?'” Petrosyan was
quoted as saying.

He also said that sport should be an inseparable part of people’s
lifestyle so that “great sportsmen will be born”.

Asked what kind of sports he went in for, Petrosyan said: “I went in
for martial art, wrestling and chess. Unfortunately, today sport is
not that popular as previously.”

“We are trying to recover good traditions through various means and
ensure a wider involvement of mass sport,” said he, adding that the
number of participants to a sports program called “Best Sport Family”
has increased 3.5 times.

Petrosyan also said that currently there are three other similar
projects – “Sport Yard,” “Sport Community” and “Sport City”.

From: A. Papazian

RA President: Medvedev Addresses His Vision On Karabakh Settlement T

RA PRESIDENT: MEDVEDEV ADDRESSES HIS VISION ON KARABAKH SETTLEMENT TO PARTIES

PanARMENIAN.Net
July 1, 2011 – 21:28 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – “In Kazan, we really could make a breakthrough in
Nagorno Karabakh conflict settlement, but, regretfully, it did not
happen,” Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan said.

He reminded that in the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of
Europe, before the summit, he had stated that there may be a
breakthrough in Kazan, if Azerbaijan does not make new claims.

“Regretfully, in Kazan official Baku showed the same conduct as during
the last year and a half. Azerbaijan carried in about 10 new changes
to the existing document. All of us know that any alternation in the
document will require changes in other points and sub-points,” The
Armenian leader said commenting on the Kazan meeting and presenting
his view on future of the process.

He reminded that this scenario has repeated at least 4 times within
the last 15 months. He thinks that this time the chance was omitted,
however, according to the President, “this does not mean the end of
negotiations, but it means that we have lost a period before a new
meeting.” “The Russian President and Minsk Group co-chars asserted
their intention to continue efforts in this issue, and the President
of Russia told me yesterday on the phone that he had already addressed
his vision in a written form. I think we shall receive it soon, and
we’ll see how to move on,” Mr.Sargsyan said.

The summit between Russia, Azerbaijan and Armenia in Kazan on June 24
completed without an agreement on basic principles of Nagorno Karabakh
conflict settlement. “The countries’ leaders registered mutual
understanding on a range of problems, the resolution of which boosts
creation of conditions for approving main principles. The meeting
participants considered the course of works carried out with the aim
of coordination of the project with basic principles,” according to
the statement. The Presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan expressed
gratitude to the Russian, French and U.S. leaders, the OSCE Minsk
group co-chairs, for ‘their constant attention to Nagorno-Karabakh
problem’ and highly praised personal efforts of the Russian President
in support of agreements.

Later on Minister of Foreign Affairs Edward Nalbanian noted that the
June 24 meeting was not a breakthrough, as Azerbaijan proved unready
to accept the final version of the basic principles suggested by the
OSCE Minsk Group Co-chairs. Instead, the Azerbaijani leader attempted
to impose 10 new proposals, thus precluding the possibility of any
agreement on the issue,” he added.

From: A. Papazian

Armenia Missed At Least One Chance In Kazan – President

ARMENIA MISSED AT LEAST ONE CHANCE IN KAZAN – PRESIDENT

Tert.am
01.07.11

After the trilateral presidential meeting in Kazan, Russia, Armenia
missed at least one chance on its way towards the settlement of the
Nagorno Karabkh conflict, the Armenian President has said at a meeting
organized jointly with his Ukrainian counterpart.

“I think we have missed at least one of our chances. That doesn’t
mean of course the negotiation process is coming to a halt or we are
discontinuing the talks. That means we have missed this period of
time until the next meeting,” Serzh Sargsyan said, according to the
Ukrainian news agency RBK.

It came after Ukrainian President Victor Yanukovich said in his
speech that his country will invest its best efforts in the conflict
settlement process after assuming the presidency of Organization for
Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) in 2013.

“We are not members of the OSCE Minsk Group but we maintain friendly
trade and economic relations with both Armenian and Azerbaijan. And
the peaceful settlement of the conflict is in the interests of the
Ukrainian people,” he said.

From: A. Papazian

Fares For Travelling By Passengers Buses, Mini Buses And Taxi In Yer

FARES FOR TRAVELLING BY PASSENGERS BUSES, MINI BUSES AND TAXI IN YEREVAN WILL NOT GO UP: YEREVAN MAYOR

/ARKA/
July 1, 2011
YEREVAN

YEREVAN, July 1. / ARKA /. Fares for traveling by buses, minibuses
and taxi in Yerevan will not climb, Yerevan Mayor Karen Karapetyan
writes in his Facebook account.

“A new route network is being formed for ground passenger traffic. Our
main purpose is to replace minibuses by large and medium-sized buses.

The network will be shaped in such a way so as to rule out rise of
prices in the foreseeable future “, the mayor says.

“We have already agreed to purchase 200 buses from China, and will
be consistent, because buses are the future of passenger transport,”
says the mayor.

The fares at the Yerevan metro doubled from July 1 from 50 drams
(about $ 0.13) to 100 drams (about 0.26 dollar).

Over-ground minibuses charge 100 drams per passenger. The Yerevan
authorities say that the subsidized underground serves up to 20
million passengers a year, or only about 10 percent of Yerevan’s
total passenger traffic. Even after the fare rise, the underground
commuter train service will not be paying its way and will still rely
on a subsidy as serving one passenger costs an estimated 160 drams,
according to mayor Karapetian.

According to the municipality, the rise in underground fare is
stipulated by an agreement Armenia signed with the European Investment
Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD)
which have committed to provide a 10 million Euros loan and a 5 million
grant for modernization of the facility. Mayor Karapetyan said also
that municipal authorities plan along with the move to curtail some of
the minibus routes duplicating the metro lines. Yerevan underground
(Metro) was commissioned in 1981 and currently operates ten subway
stations. The total length of subway lines is 13.4 km.($ 1 – 373.81
drams).

From: A. Papazian

Evolving Armenian Realities And The Surp Giragos Dikranagerd Church

EVOLVING ARMENIAN REALITIES AND THE SURP GIRAGOS DIKRANAGERD CHURCH
By: Raffi Bedrosyan

Fri, Jul 1 2011

I would like to share my thoughts about Armenian realities-evolving
ones, forgotten ones, and new ones.

This church had more than 200 deeds showing that a significant
portion of the Diyarbakir city center belonged to the church prior to
1915. At present, several apartment buildings, state schools, offices,
and shops are on these lands. So, the long and difficult process has
begun, to reclaim these lands and properties by their rightful owner,
the Surp Giragos Church.

Until 20 years ago, the Armenian reality was mainly Soviet Armenia
and the diaspora. Then, a double miracle happened and we had a free
and independent Armenia and Karabagh, creating a new reality, which
became the triangle of Armenia, Karabagh, and the diaspora. And yet,
throughout the past century, there’s been an often forgotten or
dismissed reality-the Armenians remaining in Turkey. This is a tiny
community of about 60,000, generally called Bolsahays as they live
mostly in Istanbul, which was the intellectual, cultural, political,
industrial, and social center for Armenians before 1915. Although they
are called Bolsahays, they come mostly from the historic homeland,
where they lived continuously for more than 3,000 years. These people
are not exactly diasporan or Hayasdantsi. So, how do you define them?

Where do we place them in the Hayasdan-Artsakh-Spyurk triangle? I
suggest placing them in the middle, in the heart of the triangle. Let
me explain.

For almost a century now, despite the hardships, pain, and grief
caused by the Turkish state, despite the discrimination, harassment,
and insults hurled at them by the general Turkish population, these
Armenians have continued to preserve their identity and carry the
heavy burden of protecting the legacy and heritage left behind by
their ancestors, at least in Istanbul, keeping an open and active the
Armenian Patriarchate, more than 30 churches, nearly 20 schools, and 2
hospitals. Until recently their efforts were all managed defensively,
in a survival mode, until one Armenian, originally from Malatya,
stood up in Istanbul and called upon the Turks and Turkish state to
face their past, stop falsifying historical facts, and talk about
the remaining Armenians. He stood up as an advocate of dialogue and
a bridge between Turks and Armenians. Unfortunately, the enormous
impact of Hrant Dink’s critical message and the new reality was only
understood after his murder.

Around the same time, another Armenian in Istanbul, this time from
Dikranagerd/Diyarbakir, stood up and declared that the historic Surp
Giragos Church had to be reconstructed. This church, with its seven
altars and capacity of 3,000 people-the biggest Armenian church in the
Middle East-was partially destroyed by cannon fire in 1915 and left
in ruins, on its last legs after its roof collapsed. Until recently,
the Turkish state had not allowed even minor repairs to the Armenian
schools and churches in Istanbul, let alone the full reconstruction of
a historic church in Anatolia. And yet, Vartkes Ergun Ayik persevered;
he hired expert architects, historians, and builders, obtained
all the required permits and approvals, and even more incredibly,
convinced the Diyarbakir municipal government to pay for one third of
the church’s reconstruction. The construction is now underway, with
two thirds completed, and more than half of the financing also secured.

This church had more than 200 deeds showing that a significant
portion of the Diyarbakir city center belonged to the church prior to
1915. At present, several apartment buildings, state schools, offices,
and shops are on these lands. So, the long and difficult process has
begun, to reclaim these lands and properties by their rightful owner,
the Surp Giragos Church.

This is the first time Armenians have begun to reconstruct a building
in their ancestral homeland. It is the first time they have claimed
the land and properties from their ancestral homeland, after losing
them in 1915. This is a new reality.

Another new reality is how this church is helping shape public opinion
in Turkey. Whoever sees the Surp Giragos Church, whether in person or
through the media, keeps asking, “Where are the people that belonged
to this church?” “Where are they now?” “Where did they go, and why?”

The ever-changing and most recent version of the official Turkish
state history claims that Armenians revolted on the eastern front
during World War I to join the Russians and that, as a result, the
Ottoman state temporarily deported them from only the “eastern war
zones” to the south toward the Syrian desert. But Diyarbakir was not
in the eastern front, nor in the war zone; nor was there any Armenian
revolt. As these facts become evident, Turkish citizens-both Turks
and Kurds-have started to question the falsified history. Still a
tiny percentage, there is nevertheless an ever-increasing number
of Turkish citizens, especially of the younger generations, who
have started “seeking the truth” and demanding that the state face
its past and stop its denialist policies. There are also Turkish
citizens who are fully aware of the truth, and have developed a
guilty conscience about their ancestor’s past evil deeds. This year,
the April 24, 1915 events were commemorated in five Turkish cities,
including Diyarbakir. This is another new reality.

The church, when reconstruction is completed, will become a historic
destination of pilgrimage for all Armenians-a memorial and reminder
of the past Armenian presence in Anatolia, and a hope for the future.

Armenians are few in number, and Bolsahays are even fewer, but by
engaging in a dialogue with liberal-minded Turks and Kurds eager
for the democratization of Turkey, and through cooperation with
their colleagues in the media, academia, law, construction, finance,
and political fields, these few Armenians remaining in Turkey are
learning how to undo past wrongs much more effectively than the
diaspora. No matter how often Diaspora Armenians gather together to
hear their leaders give speeches demanding the return of their lands
or to stop the denial, the deeds and results achieved inside Turkey
are much louder than the words outside. The diaspora’s efforts surely
serve a useful purpose in helping younger Armenian generations keep
their identity, or even in reminding foreign politicians of the past
injustices, but in terms of reversing these injustices, the Armenians
remaining in Turkey are starting to play a vital role through dialogue
and cooperation with their fellow Turkish citizens.

The Armenians in Turkey, therefore, deserve the maximum support of
their fellow Armenians in the diaspora and Armenia. And this is the
most important new Armenian reality.

***

If you are interested in supporting this project, you can send your
tax deductible donations, payable to Toronto Holy Trinity Armenian
Church, at the following address:

Surp Giragos Dikranagerd Church Reconstruction Committee c/o Raffi
Bedrosyan, 40 Strathearn Blvd. Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5P 1T1

From: A. Papazian

http://www.armenianweekly.com/2011/07/01/evolving-armenian-realities-and-surp-giragos-dikranagerd-church/

City Hall Launches Reforms To Enhance Municipal Governance

CITY HALL LAUNCHES REFORMS TO ENHANCE MUNICIPAL GOVERNANCE

Tert.am
01.07.11

The Yerevan City Hall has launched numerous reforms to enhance the
community governance system and promote the development of a decision
making culture, the Yerevan mayor said in his Facebook page on Friday.

“As feedback is very important for us, we use all possible channels to
obtain information. We often encounter disrespectful, non-constructive
and boring rumors. I assure you that our team is not stupid so there’s
no need to engage in ‘mental trainings’,” Karen Karapetyan said.

The mayor asked the subscribers using false profiles and dirty images
not to post all kinds of stuff on his wall as such messages will
be deleted. He noted further that such move does not imply a lack
of democracy.

Referring to the messages posted on his wall by subscribers using
false profiles, the mayor said such messages will be deleted and
added that such move does not imply a lack of democracy.

“If there’s something to say, we are always open and willing to listen
to all kinds of constructive proposals,” he said. “I am sure that
the users of my page cannot remember any case when our team gave a
disrespectful answer, though there was sometimes a desire to do so,
to be frank.”

The mayor said he finds municipality staff to be very educated and
professional, and said many people of the current team have quit
well-paid jobs to work there.

“I would kindly as you to believe and imaging that its really true
and try to encourage them,” he added.

From: A. Papazian

Clarifications From The Armenia’s Representative At The UN

CLARIFICATIONS FROM THE ARMENIA’S REPRESENTATIVE AT THE UN

armradio.am
01.07.2011 17:24

Armenia has voted against the Georgia-presented bill on the refugees
and internally displaced persons of Abkhazia and South Ossetia,
and Azerbaijan has put a draft resolution on Nagorno Karabakh on UN
agenda. Commenting on the issues, Armenia Permanent Representative
at the UN Karen Nazaryan said:

“The Resolution on “Protracted conflicts in the GUAM area and their
implications for international peace, security and development”
and “The situation in the territories of Azerbaijan” were put on UN
agenda in 2006. Armenia and other UN member countries were against
the inclusion of the issues in the agenda from the very beginning.”

According to Ambassador Nazaryan, our position on the issue remains
unchanged. “Negotiation processes are underway within the framework of
the OSCE Minsk Group, and inclusion of the issues in the UN General
Assembly agenda can in no way promote the process. On the contrary,
it will hamper the negotiations between the parties and the mediators.”

“Furthermore, these two issues cannot be considered urgent for
the UN from the point of view of international peace and security
against the background of the critical cases and issues that exist
in different sites of the world and which are being periodically
discussed in different UN bodies, including the General Assembly,
the Security Council and the International Court of Justice.”

“It’s a different question that with its bellicose statements on the
resumption of war and aggression and provocative actions, Azerbaijan
is trying to create an image of threat to the security of the South
Caucasus, thus endangering the mediating efforts of the Minsk Group
Co-Chairs.”

“We are against the resolutions. That’s why yesterday Armenia voted
against the resolution on the refugees and internally displaced
persons of Abkhazia and South Ossetia proposed by Georgia,” Karen
Nazaryan stated.

From: A. Papazian

Foreign Trade Turnover In January-May 2011 Increased By 16.4% In Arm

FOREIGN TRADE TURNOVER IN JANUARY-MAY 2011 INCREASED BY 16.4% IN ARMENIA TO $2.1 BILLION

/ARKA/
July 1, 2011
YEREVAN

In January-May 2011 volume of foreign trade turnover increased by 16.4%
in Armenia making 760.7 billion drams or about $2.1 billion compared
with 2010, Armenian National Statistic Service informs.Export volume
was $487.7 million increased by 30.8%, import – $1569.9 million
increased by 12.6%.

In its result, negative balance of foreign trade turnover was
$1082.3 million and without cargo received as humanitarian aid –
$1055.3 million.

Negative balance of foreign trade turnover in prices FOB (terms of
delivery of goods when the seller pays the expenses of transportation,
insurance and customs and expenses till the moment of delivery of
the goods on the board of ship – ARKA) – $840.5 million.

More important articles of export and import in the reporting period
were introduced in the following groups of goods: “mining industry ”
– $161.8 million (increase by 55.1% compared with January-May 2010),
“non-precious metals and goods” – $159.9 million (increase by 25.4%),
“precious metals and goods, semi-precious stones” – $58.7 million
(increase by 4.5%), “ready products for food industry” – $57.7 million
(increase by 40.7%), etc.

Import of products of such groups of goods as “mining industry ” –
$311.3 million (increase by 21.2% compared with January-May 2010),
“ground, air and water transport means” – $161.9 million (increase
by 47%), “non-precious metals and goods” – $133.1 million (increase
by 2.1%), “goods of vegetable production” – $111.3 million (increase
by 49.9%), “ready food products” – $114.3 million (increase by 9.1%)
increased. In the groups of goods “machines, equipment and mechanisms”
decline by 15% to $208.7 million was registered. ($1-368.86 drams).

From: A. Papazian

Iran capable of making missiles with over 2,000 km range

Iran capable of making missiles with over 2,000 km range

Tehran, June 28, IRNA – Iran has the technology to manufacture
missiles with over 2,000 km range, Aerospace Commander of the Islamic
Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) Brigadier General Amir Ali Hajizadeh
said Tuesday.

Hajizadeh made the remarks on the sidelines of the ongoing military
drills codenamed, `Great Prophet Mohammad-6.’

He stressed that the Zionist regime was in a 1,200-km distance from
Iran while the distances of the US military bases in the region from
Iran varied from 120 to 700 km.

`Trans-regional enemies of Iran are only the US and the Zionist
regime,’ Hajizadeh said, stressing that Tehran’s missile power `is no
threat against European countries.’

According to the brigadier general, a number of drone planes were
downed by Iranian forces.

He added that a group of Russian experts came to visit the planes.

From: A. Papazian

BAKU: Iran can mediate in NK conflict, if Azerbaijan interested

Trend, Azerbaijan
July 2 2011

Top official: Iran can mediate in Karabakh conflict resolution, if
Azerbaijan interested in this (UPDATE)

[02.07.2011 12:06]
Details added (the first version was posted at 10:57)

Azerbaijan, Baku, July 2 / Trend T.Jafarov /

Iran can become a mediator in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict
resolution, if Azerbaijan is interested in it, Iranian Parliamentary
Speaker Ali Larijani said at a press-conference in Baku today.

“The Karabakh conflict should be resolved within Azerbaijan’s
territorial integrity through negotiations and with the participation
of the regional countries. Major countries think only about their
interests, and they play for their own interests instead of solving
the problems,” he said.

Larijani also answered a question about the Iranian Parliament’s
position regarding the destruction of historical and Islamic monuments
in Karabakh. “If our friendly country- Azerbaijan -develops a
political format to resolve this issue, Iran is ready to provide
support in this format”, he said.

He also voiced his attitude to the issue of deploying international
peacekeeping forces in Nagorno-Karabakh.

“We should not seek to choose the worst way to resolve the conflict,
to address which more logical ways exist. It would be more logical if
the parties achieved consensus. Achievement of an agreement between
the parties with the regional countries’ mediation also would be
nice,” Larijani stated.

He said the deployment of peacekeepers in Nagorno Karabakh will
further complicate the problem.

“Some major countries use the international organizations as a tool in
their hands. Theretofore, it is unknown what will be the future
deployment of international peacekeeping forces in the region. If the
international organization and structures were truly independent and
not a tool in someone’s hands, the deployment of peacekeepers could be
a way to resolve the conflict. At the moment, we do not see the
independence of international organizations, and sometimes these
international forces further complicate the problem. It is therefore
necessary to create conditions for the use of different ways to
resolve the conflict,” he added.

Larijani kicked off his visit to Azerbaijan on Friday. Larijani is
visiting Azerbaijan on invitation from the Azerbaijani Parliamentary
Speaker Ogtay Asadov. The visit aimed to enhance Iranian-Azerbaijani
inter-parliamentary cooperation.

He met with Asadov, Prime Minister Artur Rasizade, and the country’s
other officials in Baku.
Larijani’s visit to Azerbaijan was initially scheduled for February
however, it was postponed due to his busy work schedule.

From: A. Papazian