Yerevan Hails Swiss Policy On Armenia

YEREVAN HAILS SWISS POLICY ON ARMENIA

PanARMENIAN.Net
30.01.2009 13:37 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Currently in Davos, Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan
met Thursday with his Swiss counterpart Hans-Rudolf Merz to discuss
the current level of bilateral relations, ways to overcome the global
financial crisis and a number of regional problems, the RA leader’s
press office reported.

President Sargsyan thanked the Swiss government for assistance and
balanced policy toward Armenia within international organizations.

EU Reaches Air Services ‘Breakthrough’ With Canada, Inks Accords Wit

EU REACHES AIR SERVICES ‘BREAKTHROUGH’ WITH CANADA, INKS ACCORDS WITH ARMENIA, ISRAEL
by Aaron Karp

ATWOnline
Dec 10 2008
MD

The EU yesterday announced a far-reaching air services agreement
with Canada that includes reciprocal investment and signed new air
services accords with Armenia and Israel.

A European Commission statement hailed "a breakthrough in the EU-Canada
negotiations. . .[that] both completes the transatlantic market
started with the EU-US first stage aviation agreement and goes well
beyond it." Under terms of the agreement expected to be signed soon,
all EU airlines will be able to operate direct flights to Canada from
anywhere in Europe and all restrictions on routes, prices or weekly
flight numbers between Canada and the EU will be eliminated.

"Other traffic rights will be liberalized gradually in parallel with
the opening up of investment opportunities," the EC said, adding, "EU
nationals will be able to establish operations in Canada and freely
invest in Canadian airlines and vice versa." VP and Commissioner
for Transport Antonio Tajani called the accord "groundbreaking in
the aviation world as the agreement includes all possible aspects
of aviation, including investment." Air Canada commented that it
will open "a realm of new commercial opportunities. . .in Canada’s
second-largest travel market after the US."

The agreement signed with Armenia will allow all European airlines
to fly between Armenia and any EU state. The pact signed with Israel
"will remove nationality restrictions. . .[allowing] any EU airline
to operate flights between any EU member state and Israel where
a bilateral agreement with Israel exists and traffic rights are
available," the EC said.

Armenia Retains Top Spot In Chess Olympiad

ARMENIA RETAINS TOP SPOT IN CHESS OLYMPIAD

The Associated Press
November 21, 2008

DRESDEN, Germany: Top-seeded Russia held off the United States in
the 38th Chess Olympiad in round eight of open division play Friday,
but the Armenian team crushed France and stayed in first place.

In women’s division play, the U.S. team dealt a severe blow to the
medal hopes of the Russian team, also the top seed, beating it 3-1. The
win gave the U.S. team 6.5 match points to keep it in a second-place
tie with several others.

The U.S. was led by Irina Krush, who beat women’s world champion
Alexandra Kosteniuk on board one. She sacrificed a pawn on move 16. Her
compensation was dubious until Kosteniuk misplaced her rook. Kosteniuk
managed to come up with some tactical complications but they could
not save her in the end.

The Americans also picked up a win from Anna Zatonskih on board two
against Tatiana Kosintseva, who sacrificed a pawn only to fritter
away her compensation before losing a second pawn and the game.

The other two games in the match, Rusudan Goletiani against Tatiana’s
sister Nadezhda Kosintseva, and American Katerina Rohonyan against
Ekaterina Korbut, were drawn.

The Americans won on board one as Gata Kamsky downed Peter Svidler. But
the other three boards went badly, although Alexander Onischuk salvaged
a draw for the U.S. on board three when Alexander Morozevich blundered
in a=2 0winning endgame.

Alexander Grischuk picked up a pawn, traded it in for an exchange
and ground down Hikaru Nakamura on board two, and Dmitry Jakovenko
steamrolled Varuzhan Akobian on board four.

The Chess Olympiad, a biennial event that started Nov. 13, includes
146 teams in the open division — often referred to as the men’s
division, even though it includes a few women. The separate women’s
division includes 111 teams.

Armenia leads the open division with 7.5 match points after beating
France 3.5-0.5 in round eight.

Israel has seven, and Russian and Ukraine are tied with 6.5.

In other open division matches, England kept its medal hopes alive by
beating Georgia 2.5-1.5 behind Nigel Short’s victory over Zviad Izoria.

England is tied with several other teams at six points.

Thirty-seventh seed Vietnam scored an upset tie match against third
seed China 2-2. India and Slovenia tied 2-2. These teams, along with
the U.S., Hungary and several others, have 5.5 points and only dim
hopes of getting a medal.

Bosnia-Herzegovina edged Australia 2.5-1.5 behind Zeljko Bogut’s
win over Darryl Johansen. It was Johansen’s first loss after winning
his first five games. Ukraine annihilated New Zealand 4-0 in one of
the many mismatches that the modified pairing system has produced in
this event.

On the women’s side, China tied Ukraine 2-2 to stay in first place
with seven points. Poland, Serbia, the United S tates and Ukraine
are all tied for second with 6.5 points.

Round nine takes place here on Saturday with play continuing on Sunday.

Monday is an off-day, and the tournament concludes Tuesday.

Some of the pairings Saturday in open division play include
Armenia-Israel, Russia-Ukraine, Serbia-Azerbaijan, France-China,
Poland-Germany, Vietnam-England, India-U.S., and New Zealand-Georgia.

In the women’s section, China plays Serbia and the U.S. plays Poland.

On the Net:

http://www.dresden2008.de/site/en/main.htm
http://www.fide.com

ANCA: Menendez Hammers Turkey’s "Historical Commission" Proposal

ARMENIAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE OF AMERICA
1711 N Street NW
Washington, DC 20036
Tel: (202) 775-1918
Fax: (202) 775-5648
Email: [email protected]
Website:

PRESS RELEASE
September 24, 2008
Contact: Elizabeth S. Chouldjian
Tel: (202) 775-1918
Email: [email protected]

MENENDEZ HAMMERS TURKEY’S "HISTORICAL COMMISSION" PROPOSAL

— Senators Menendez and Kerry Grill Ambassador Designate to Ankara
during Confirmation Hearing

WASHINGTON, DC – New Jersey Senator Bob Menendez pressed U.S.
Ambassador to Turkey nominee James Jeffrey to explain the
Administration’s apparent renewed backing for Turkey’s widely
discredited push for a "historical commission" on the Armenian
Genocide, reported the Armenian National Committee of America
(ANCA). The move comes despite the State Department’s pledge, made
during the nomination process for U.S. Ambassador to Armenia Marie
Yovanovitch, to oppose efforts that would open to debate the fact
that Ottoman Turkey used mass killings, ethnic cleansing, and
forced deportations to destroy over one and half million Armenians.

"We want to share our special thanks with Senator Menendez for,
once again, shining a powerful international spotlight on the
Administration’s policy of complicity in Turkey’s denial of the
Armenian Genocide," stated ANCA Executive Director Aram Hamparian.
"We are especially for his incisive line of questioning regarding
the State Department’s flawed and inconsistent position on Turkey’s
self-serving proposal for a historical commission. A clear
illustration of the bankruptcy of the Administration’s policy on
the Armenian Genocide was the nominee’s convoluted response to the
simple question, posed by Senator Menendez: ‘If Turkey would be
willing to recognize the Armenian Genocide, would the United States
be willing to do so?’"

Ambassador-Designate Jeffrey’s confirmation hearing, held earlier
today, was chaired by Senator John Kerry (D-MA), who, in his
opening remarks, cited his decades long support for Congressional
reaffirmation of the Armenian Genocide. Following Amb. Jeffrey’s
testimony, Sen. Kerry led the questioning on the Armenian Genocide,
asking if the nominee could "assure the Committee that the
Administration is not supporting – financially, rhetorically, or
otherwise – an effort to convene a commission to settle an
historical debate [on the Armenian Genocide] – that in effect is
not a debate."

Jeffrey responded, "Mr. Chairman, as you have indicated, the
Administration recognizes and mourns, and is very, very, very
concerned about the historical facts, which include, as you said,
the mass killing and the forced exile of up to 1.5 million
Armenians at the end of the Ottoman Empire. We support, as
President Bush made clear in his recent statement on March 24th,
the open effort on both sides to get to the bottom of the
historical facts and to move forward as part of a reconciliation
process both to establish closer and eventually full relations and
to work out these dark chapters in the past."

Sen. Kerry followed up, asking if Jeffrey is, in effect saying that
"we are supportive of the historical commission itself and its
goal? Or are we supportive of simply maintaining the historical
records?"

Jeffrey responded: "We are supportive of anything the two sides
mutually agree on, Sir. And as part of any process, there should
be a full and open review of the events of that time."

Jeffrey’s response sparked a series of probing questions from
Senator Menendez, who opened his remarks by expressing his "dismay"
at Jeffrey’s answers, arguing, "that puts us before where we were
when we had the Ambassador designee to Armenia [Marie Yovanovitch]
being interviewed." Senator Menendez then quoted extensively from a
July, 2008, letter from Asst. Secretary of Legislative Affairs
Matthew Reynolds, issued to clarify various responses that U.S.
Ambassador to Armenia Marie Yovanovitch had given during her
confirmation hearing. The letter explained that, a proposed effort
to bring Turkish and Armenian archivists to the U.S. is not a means
to "open a debate on whether the Ottomans committed these
horrendous acts; it is to help preserve the documentation that
supports the truth of those events." The letter went on to note
that "the Administration recognizes that the mass killings, ethnic
cleansing, and forced deportations of over one and a half million
Armenians were conducted by the Ottoman Empire. We indeed hold
Ottoman officials responsible for those crimes."

Sen. Menendez, concerned that Jeffrey had veered away from
Administration policy articulated in the Reynolds letter, asked
"The historical facts, as I see it, have now been admitted to by
the State Department and clearly stated as such." And I don’t get
the sense that’s what you’re telling us, so that puts a
complication in this process. Maybe you can help us out."

Jeffrey was again evasive, responding that, "what assistant Sec.
Reynolds wrote is U.S. government policy and we stand by it. What
I was trying to convey was that it is also important for Turks and
Armenians to move forward on a joint effort to work on these issues
to come to some kind of, to the extent they can, common view of the
historical past."

Menendez shot back, asking "Why would we support an initiative that
ultimately doubts whether those are the historical facts? If the
Turks seek to do it, that’s one thing. But why would we be
supportive of an effort that ultimately undermines the very
position that the State Department has?"

Jeffrey responded in generalities, noting "In conflicts such as
this, Senator, we believe, and we apply this across the board in
the many conflicts that I have been involved in, we have an
obligation to the historical record and to our citizens to have our
own views, but it is also important to encourage the various sides
on a dispute, be it this one, be it others, to try to come to some
sort of joint understanding of the past and a joint way forward for
the future."

Menendez then went back to Sen. Kerry’s original question once
again. "Would you then, as Ambassador, be someone who would
advocate rhetorically, financially or otherwise, that the
commission should be constituted and move forward?" Jeffrey
responded: "The effort that can be taken for people to review
openly the facts of that period would be supported by me."

Sen. Menendez would later return to Amb. Jeffrey for a second round
of questioning, expressing frustration that the lack of "straight
answers" from Ambassadors precludes Senators from making "straight
judgments" on key foreign policy issues. He then asked Amb.
Jeffrey, simply, if "If Turkey would be willing to recognize the
Armenian Genocide, would the United States be willing to do so?"
Jeffrey initially replied that he "can’t commit the Administration
to any future action," but upon further questioning stated, that
while Turkish recognition would be important, "there would be other
factors that would have to be weighed, such as our general approach
to other conflicts in the region and taking positions. The
relationship between Turkey and Armenia is a major factor in the
policies we take, the words we use. But there are other factors as
well, sir."

Menendez ended his questioning on the Administration’s Armenian
Genocide policy by asking whether Jeffrey would follow in the
footsteps of Undersecretary Edelman and Assistant Secretary of
State Dan Fried, who, according to multiple press accounts, last
October, traveled to Turkey to "express regret" at House Foreign
Affairs Committee passage of Armenian Genocide legislation.
"Senator," said Jeffrey, "I never have and I never will express
regret. This is an independent and equal organ of the U.S.
government and it deserves the respect of everyone, everywhere in
the world."

Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman and Vice-Presidential
nominee Joe Biden and other Committee members are set to submit
additional questions to Ambassadorial nominee, who may be confirmed
as early as Friday of this week.

Extended excerpts from the Menendez-Jeffrey question and answer
session follow.

#####

Excerpts of the Menendez-Jeffrey Question and Answer Session
Senate Foreign Relations Committee
September 24, 2008

Sen. Menendez: When you say ‘we support whatever the commission
does to get to the bottom of the historical facts’ well, that’s not
what the Administration has said to us. The Administration in its
letter, unless we are not to believe letters sent to this Committee
now, states ‘our goal is not to open a debate on whether the
Ottomans committed these horrendous acts; it is to help preserve
the documentation that supports the truth of those events.’ And
that letter by Asst. Secretary of Legislative Affairs Mr. Reynolds,
further went on to state that ‘the Administration recognizes that
the mass killings, ethnic cleansing, and forced deportations of
over one and a half million Armenians were conducted by the Ottoman
Empire. We indeed hold Ottoman officials responsible for those
crimes.’ What I heard you respond to the question is quite
different. So do you want to clear it up or are you sticking to
your story that we support whatever it is to get to the bottom of
the facts. The historical facts, as I see it, have now been
admitted to by the State Department and clearly stated as such.
And I don’t get the sense that’s what you’re telling us, so that
puts a complication in this process. Maybe you can help us out."

Amb. Jeffrey: Certainly what Assistant Sec. Reynolds wrote is U.S.
government policy and we stand by it. What I was trying to
communicate was that it is also important for Turks and Armenians
to move forward on a joint effort to work on these issues to come
to some kind of, to the extent they can, common view of the
historical past.

Sen. Menendez: If in fact we already have come to the conclusion
that the historical facts, as outlined by Mr. Reynolds on behalf of
the State Department in July of this year, are that ‘we indeed hold
Ottoman officials responsible for those crimes,’ why would we
support an initiative that ultimately doubts whether those are the
historical facts? If the Turks seek to do it, that’s one thing. But
why would we be supportive of an effort that ultimately undermines
the very position that the State Department has?

Amb. Jeffrey: In conflicts such as this, Senator, we believe that
as a general rule, and we apply this across the board in the many
conflicts that I have been involved in, we have an obligation to
our own citizens and the historical record to have our own views,
but it is also important to encourage the various sides on a
dispute, be it this one, be it others, to try come to some sort of
joint understanding of the past and a joint way forward for the
future.

Sen. Menendez: Would you then, as Ambassador, be someone who would
advocate rhetorically, financially or otherwise, that the
commission should be constituted and move forward?

Amb. Jeffrey: The effort that can be taken for people to review
openly the facts of that period would be supported by me.

======================
Sen. Menendez: If Turkey would be willing to recognize the Armenian
Genocide, would the United States be willing to do so?

Amb. Jeffrey: We would have to see at that time. I can’t commit
the Administration to any future action.

Sen. Menendez: I realize you can’t. But would you, as U.S.
Ambassador to Turkey, say to the next Administration – whoever that
Administration may be – that we should recognize it as well?

Amb. Jeffrey: We constantly review many things in our foreign
policy processes. This one, because of the great interest in the
American public and in Congress, is one that gets reviewed all the
time. That would certainly be a major factor in any review, if the
two sides could come to an agreement on that particular term or
other issues, related to the past, Sir.

Sen. Menendez: Well, if Turkey, on its own, came to the evolution
that in fact it made a decision that ‘yes, a previous – not even
Turkey as we know it today – but the Ottoman Empire did what the
State Department says it has’, that ‘yes, there was a Genocide’
would it not be in the interest of the United States to recognize
what Turkey itself has recognized?

Amb. Jeffrey: It would be, as you said, a very important factor,
but aside from being concerned of committing this or a future
Administration to a specific course of action or predicting it,
there would be other factors that would have to be weighed, such as
our general approach to other conflicts in the region and taking
positions. The relationship between Turkey and Armenia is a major
factor in the policies we take, the words we use. But there are
other factors as well, sir.

Sen. Menendez: When you take your oath, should you be confirmed as
the Ambassador to Turkey, do you know what that oath says?

Amb. Jeffrey: Yes, Sir.

Sen. Menendez: And does that oath speak to an Adminstration or to
the country.

Amb. Jeffrey: It speaks to the country, Senator.

Sen. Menendez: And in that respect, one of the things I look for,
when we have nominees here is that, understanding fully that the
State Department to a large degree and whatever Administration you
work for is going to define your parameters, when I have an
Ambassador here, I want to be able to get straight talk, so that I
know and I can make straight judgments as one member of the U.S.
Senate, and as a member of this committee. And I can’t get that
straight talk if I hear a constant constrainment of what is the
truth or the realities or opinions you may have in a country as it
relates to questions being posed to you as Members of this
committee. So, I hope that we recognize that the oath is to this
country and this [the Senate] is an institution of the country, at
the end of the day. And so, let me ask you this question. There
are a series of media accounts [. . .] that reported that
Undersecretary of State Edelman and Assistant Secretary of State
Dan Fried traveled to Turkey in October of 2007 to "express regret"
over the adoption of the Armenian Genocide resolution by the U.S.
House Foreign Affairs Committee, one that I sat in at one time. Is
it your view, should you ultimately be approved by the Senate as an
Ambassador, to express regret of what an institution of the U.S.
Congress does?

Amb. Jeffrey: Senator, I never have and I never will express
regret. This is an independent and equal organ of the U.S.
government and it deserves the respect of everyone, everywhere in
the world.

Sen. Menendez: I appreciate that answer.

======================================== ====
Text of July 29th State Department Letter to
Senate Foreign Relations Committee

United States Department of State
Washington DC, 20520

July 29, 2008

Dear Mr. Chairman:

I am writing in response to your concerns regarding responses to
questions for the record submitted by you and Senator Menendez
regarding the nomination of Marie Yovanovitch as Ambassador to
Armenia.

Regarding your Question #1, Ms. Yovanovitch mentions an
International Visitors Program under consideration that would bring
archivists from Turkey and Armenia to the United States for
professional training. Our goal is to help archivists protect the
evidence of the past so that future generations will have the
documentation of the mass killings and deportations of Armenians
committed by Ottoman soldiers and other Ottoman officials in 1915.
Our goal is not to open a debate on whether the Ottomans committed
these horrendous acts; it is to help preserve the documentation
that supports the truth of those events.

Regarding Ms. Yovanovitch’s response to Senator Menendez’s Question
#8, the Administration recognizes that the mass killings, ethnic
cleansing, and forced deportations of over one and a half million
Armenians were conducted by the Ottoman Empire. We indeed hold
Ottoman officials responsible for those crimes.

In her testimony, Ms. Yovanovitch tried to convey her deep empathy
with the profound suffering of the Armenian people and in no way
sought to cast any doubt on historical facts.

We hope this information is helpful to you. Please do not hesitate
to contact us if we can be of further assistance on this or any
other matter.

Sincerely,

[signed]
Matthew A. Reynolds
Acting Assistant Secretary
Legislative Affairs

The Honorable
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Chairman,
Committee on Foreign Relations,
United States Senate

www.anca.org

Steps To Be Undertaken To Solve Problem Of Irrigation Water In Armav

STEPS TO BE UNDERTAKEN TO SOLVE PROBLEM OF IRRIGATION WATER IN ARMAVIR REGION SOON

NOYAN TAPAN

JU LY 2

RA Prime Minister Tigran Sargsian, visiting the village of Aknashen,
RA Armavir region, on July 1, got acquainted with the problems
both Aknashen residents and inhabitants of a number of neighboring
villages are concerned with. According to the Prime Minister, it is
very gladdening that all communities first of all raise the problem
of schools’ repair, as children should study in favorable conditions,
and if there is a willingness to learn, it means that "our future
will be reliable."

Touching upon irrigation water problems, T. Sargsian said that the
volume of irrigation water has abruptly reduced in the past years in
the country, and many land plots are not irrigated. In his words,
the villagers’ complaint is appropriate, and the government will
undertake steps in that direction.

In response to the villagers’ complaint whether it is possible to
reduce the interest rates of short-term credits given to villagers,
T. Sargsian said that he had got acquainted with the indices of
ACBACreditAgricole Bank and saw that the villagers return the credits
by 99%, which means that "the villagers’ complaint is inappropriate."

http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=115177

Insurance Company ‘HSBC Bank Armenia’ To Specialize On Life Insuranc

INSURANCE COMPANY ‘HSBC BANK ARMENIA’ TO SPECIALIZE ON LIFE INSURANCE

arminfo
2008-05-20 14:33:00

ArmInfo. Insurance company will mainly specialize on life insurance,
chief executive director of Tim Slator said at the press-conference
when replying at ArmInfo correspondent’s question.

He also added that specific terms of this company entering the
insurance market is defined by introduction of relevant legislative
basis. ‘We shall start insurance when Central Bank confirms necessary
standards including those regarding pension insurance’, – he said.

Tim Slator said earlier that ‘HSBC Bank Armenia’ will enter Armenian
insurance market in 2009.

To recall, today 10 insurance companies are functioning in Armenia,
but none of them deal with life insurance.

PM of the Kingdom of Thailand congratulates RA PM on appointment

PM of the Kingdom of Thailand congratulates RA Prime Minister on
appointment

armradio.am
05.05.2008 16:59

The Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Thailand Samak Sundaravej
congratulated RA Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan on appointment. The
congratulatory message states in part:

"On behalf of the Government and the people of the Kingdom of Thailand,
I have the honor to extend to Your Excellency our sincere
congratulations and wishes in connection with your appointment to the
post of Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia.

I am convinced that under your management, the relations between the
Kingdom of Thailand and the Republic of Armenia will be strengthened
and deepened to the benefit of our countries and peoples. I take this
opportunity to wish you every success at this highly responsible post."

Cyprus House President Calls On Turkey For Recognition Of Armenian G

CYPRUS HOUSE PRESIDENT CALLS ON TURKEY FOR RECOGNITION OF ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

PanARMENIAN.Net
24.04.2008 16:24 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ President of the House of Representatives Marios
Karoyan has reiterated the support of the House to the demand of the
Armenian people for the recognition of the Armenian Genocide of 1915.

In an address, read by the Director of his Office, at an event on
Wednesday evening organized by the Committee in Memory of the Armenian
Genocide, to mark the 93rd anniversary of the genocide, Karoyan noted
that "tonight we recall the huge crime, we honor the victims of the
Armenian Genocide and we condemn once again the atrocious crime and
the criminals."

Karoyan called on Turkey to recognize and admit its crime and to
apologize to the Armenian people and humanity as a whole.

The House President pointed out that the House, along with the Greek
parliament, was among the first to condemn the Armenian genocide and
support the demand for its recognition by the international community.

"We do not beg, we do not implore. We demand justice from the
contemporary democratic humanity, the entire international community,
all the nations and all the peoples. Nothing more, nothing less,"
he stated.

In his remarks at the commemoration ceremony, former Greek Minister
of Defense Akis Tsohatzopoulos said that recognition of the Armenian
genocide is a duty to history.

The Armenian and the Pontian Genocide is a historical fact and cannot
be dismissed, he said, adding that Turkey does not show any resolve
to accept its responsibilities.

Referring to the continuing occupation of Cyprus’ northern part by
Turkey, he said Ankara must realize that its European perspective
passes through its relationship with Greece and Cyprus.

"We support President Christofias’ efforts at all levels and we are by
side of the Greek Cypriots for a fair and viable solution," he added.

The Representative of the Armenians in Cyprus Vartkes Mahdessian said,
in his address, that the Cyprus House of Representatives was the
first parliament which was the first parliament to have recognized
the Genocide and condemned Turkey for this heinous crime.

He described the genocide as one of the biggest tragedies with global
ramifications and called on Ankara to find the courage to recognize the
crimes committed by past governments to many people around the globe.

Mahdessian said Turkey refuses to establish diplomatic ties with
Armenia and imposes an embargo on the country, Financial Mirror
reports.

Diamanda Galas @ Queen Elizabeth Hall, London

DIAMANDA GALAS @ QUEEN ELIZABETH HALL, LONDON

Playlouder news
gal-s-queen-elizabeth-hall-london
April 3 2008
UK

It’s a motley crew sipping Pinot Noir from plastic in the foyer of
Queen Elizabeth Hall, and small wonder: from what little I’ve heard
about (and by) tonight’s performer, she’s likely to be filed under
‘niche’, if indeed she’s likely to be filed, which I doubt.

Personally, I’ve never dared slot ‘Defixiones: Will and Testament’
in between Free’s ‘Fire and Water’ and the eponymous debut album
by Garbage.

The idea of Shirley singing "I’m only happy when it rains" on one side
and Paul singing "Alright now" on the other, while betwixt Diamanda
wails and screams in languages I don’t know about the Armenian genocide
does not sit well with me.

Tonight’s performance isn’t about genocide though, or about AIDS,
(another of Diamanda’s favourite topics), it’s about (as unlikely as
it may seem) love.

Ms. Galas’ latest collection, ‘Guilty, Guilty, Guilty’, is billed as
"a program of tragic and homicidal love songs and death songs", but
I haven’t heard it yet, so am earnestly hoping for a cover of Bobby
Goldsborough’s ‘Honey’. She specialises in covers, although ‘cover’
doesn’t really do her justice. Perhaps ‘deconstruction’ or simply
‘destruction’ would be closer to the truth? (And we’re not talking
Emma Bunton’s ‘Downtown’ here.)

Diamanda emerges from a successfully foreboding cloud of solid carbon
dioxide looking like she means business. If you can imagine Cruella
de Vil as painted by Hieronymus Bosch in his little-known monochrome
period, you’re close. She seats herself gracefully at the lone piano
on the large, empty stage, (careful not to sit on her hair), draws
back her long black, black sleeves revealing slender white, white
fingers, and without so much as a "Hello London!" begins tentatively
exploring the length of the keyboard, feeling it, playing with it,
and then attacking it quite savagely.

She got very angry once when a journalist said she didn’t improvise
live. Now I’m no piano expert, but frankly I’d be pretty bloody
surprised if the death jazz, doom blues, creepingly monstrous, and
occasionally dainty technique we witness is anything but archaic
deities being channelled.

And her voice? Well, suffice to say I suggested to staff on my way
out that they might want to consider fitting the seats with belts,
and the audience with crash helmets. Not to say it’s not a thing of
beauty – it is – but Diamanda’s voice is like a natural disaster of
supernatural proportions. Insure your ears against acts of God. You
have been warned.

When ‘Gloomy Sunday’ was played in Hungary in the early 20th century
it apparently encouraged a spate of deaths, so much so that it became
known as ‘The Hungarian Suicide Song’. The desperate lyrics coupled
with the already crippling Curse of Turan were too much for the
miserable Magyars, and they topped themselves by the dozen.

Had they heard Diamanda’s rendering, perhaps it’d have done the
job for them. When Diamanda sings she is not a lone forsaken lover,
she is all forsaken love.

She sings in numerous languages too. French, being the only other one
I vaguely understood, and that was quite a pleasant song: I may even
have tapped my foot.

The rapturous applause that greets the end of each song is especially
fervent after one unrecognisable number. The chap next to me leaps up
and shouts "Σ’αγα&am p;#960;ώ!" so I assume it was
(or he is) Greek.

Anyway, smashing stuff.

http://playlouder.com/content/16647/diamanda-

Yerevan Press Club Weekly Newsletter – 01/24/2008

YEREVAN PRESS CLUB WEEKLY NEWSLETTER

JANUARY 18-24, 2008

HIGHLIGHTS:

THE EMPTY SEAT IN "FACE OF THE COUNTRY" TV DEBATES

FOURTH "PRESS CLUB" SUPPLEMENT

FINAL PROGRAM OF "PRESS-CLUB" PRE-ELECTION CYCLE

DECEMBER REPORT ON BROADCAST MEDIA MONITORING

CEC APPROVED THE PROCEDURE FOR THE PROVISION OF AIR TO PRESIDENCY CANDIDATES
BY PUBLIC BROADCASTERS

ARSON ATTEMPT OF "ASPAREZ" OFFICE

"ARAVOT" PUBLISHED A REFUTATION OF ITS ARTICLE ABOUT "ARMENIA" TV COMPANY

"CAPITAL" BECOMES A DAILY

SEDRAK DAVIDIAN PASSED AWAY

WORKING MEETING OF ARMENIAN AND TURKISH JOURNALISTS IN ISTANBUL

PERSPECTIVE
MEMORY OF HRANT DINK DESERVES MORE THAN JUST SORROW

THE EMPTY SEAT IN "FACE OF THE COUNTRY" TV DEBATES

On January 23 on the evening air of "Yerkir Media" the first program of
pre-election TV debate series, "The Face of the Country", was broadcast. The
program is produced under a project of Yerevan Press Club supported by the
UN Development Program. The cycle is made of 6 programs. In the first three
of them representatives of RA presidency candidates will take part, in
others the debates would evolve between the candidates themselves. Among the
other urgent issues the discussion will center on the problems raised in the
talk-shows, earlier broadcast on five regional TV channels under the same
YPC project (see YPC Weekly Newsletter, January 11-17, 2008).

The invitees of TV debates of January 23 were the representatives of
presidential candidates Serge Sargsian, Levon Ter-Petrosian and Arman
Melikian. However, for different reasons the representatives of the former
two candidates refused to take part in this program, and their absence was
signified by an empty seat. In the debates, hosted by "Yerkir Media"
observer Mariam Barseghian, the head of the pre-election headquarters of
Arman Melikian Eleonora Asatrian and the Chairman of the Committee to
Protect Freedom of Expression Ashot Melikian took part. The discussion
centered on issues of political culture, administration of free and fair
elections, democratic reforms, and development of regions.

The next program of "Face of the Country" cycle will be aired by "Yerkir
Media" on Wednesday, January 30, at 21.40.

FOURTH "PRESS CLUB" SUPPLEMENT

On January 19 on the air of "Yerkir Media" TV company the fourth supplement
to "Press Club" program cycle was aired. The supplement deals with the
problems of media coverage of election campaign. In the supplements
journalists and public take part. The program is produced under the project
of Media Diversity Institute with the financial assistance of the US
Department of State Public Affairs Section.

FINAL PROGRAM OF "PRESS-CLUB" PRE-ELECTION CYCLE

On January 18 the final "Press Club" show went on the evening air of "Yerkir
Media". The guest of the program host, the President of Yerevan Press Club
Boris Navasardian, was the leader of "National Unity" party Artashes
Geghamian. The discussion subjects were the presidential elections, in
particular the election platform of Artashes Geghamian as a presidency
candidate nominated by the party.

The "Press Club" cycle was produced under a project of Media Diversity
Institute, supported by Open Society Institute Assistance
Foundation-Armenia.

DECEMBER REPORT ON BROADCAST MEDIA MONITORING

On January 18 "TEAM" Research Center and Yerevan Press Club published the
interim report (December 6-20, 2007) on monitoring broadcast media ahead of
presidential elections 2008. The monitoring was implemented from October to
December, 2007 by "TEAM" Research Center with the support of Open Society
Institute Assistance Foundation-Armenia, and with expert and resource
assistance of Yerevan Press Club. (See the interim reports for November and
October in the issues of YPC Weekly Newsletter, December 7-13, 2007 and
November 16-22, 2007, respectively.)

The monitoring covered the programs at prime time (18.00-24.00) of 8
broadcast media: 4 national TV companies – the First Channel of the Public
Television of Armenia, "ALM", "Armenia", Second Armenian TV Channel; 3 TV
companies in Yerevan – "Yerkir Media", "Kentron", "Shant"; 1 national radio
company – Public Radio of Armenia.

In December 2007 the format of the monitoring has undergone certain changes.
Firstly, the research covered the period not of December 1-15, 2007 (as
planned at first) but started on December 6, the official deadline for
nomination of presidency candidates, and went forth to cover five more days,
i.e., December 20. In fact, in December the monitoring was administered on
the days when the coverage was most typical, and was not conducted on
December 1-5 (period of uncertainty of nominees) and on the days preceding
the New Year and Christmas holidays (December 21-31), when the programming
of the broadcasters is adjusted to reflect the festivities.

Secondly, as compared to October-November, the list of monitoring objects
changed, too. The study object in December were all the nine candidates
nominated for presidency, as well as, similarly to the previous monitoring
months, the study targeted the leaders of parties who scored more than 1% at
the parliamentary elections of 2007 (but for those who cannot run in
elections by law). Besides, the December list of the politicians studied
included the RA President Robert Kocharian so as to determine the degree of
the broadcast media attention to the incumbent President in comparison with
candidates nominated. The list excluded the potential candidates, who
decided to refuse from running in elections.

Thus, on December 6-20 the monitoring object were 17 politicians. The
methodology of the research however remained unchanged throughout the three
months (see below).

"TEAM" Research Center and Yerevan Press Club have made the following main
conclusions:

DURING THE 15 DECEMBER DAYS the distribution of attention to the politicians
at focus of monitoring by 7 TV and 1 radio channels studied was about as
intensive as during the previous stages. Similarly to October -November, in
December three nominated candidates continued to remain the leaders in terms
of aggregate (on all 8 channels studied) airtime – the RA Prime Minister,
the Chairman of the Republican Party of Armenia Serge Sargsian (42,731
sec.), the leader of the Popular Party Tigran Karapetian (39,091 sec.) and
the first RA President Levon Ter-Petrosian (14,497 sec.). The third place –
between Karapetian and Ter-Petrosian – was taken by the incumbent President
of Armenia Robert Kocharian (19,683 sec.), covered in the vast majority of
cases as the head of state.

77.7% of the aggregate airtime of Serge Sargsian was his coverage as an
official. As such, he had received much more attention than Robert Kocharian
(33,185 and 19,062 sec., respectively). In December in the references to
Sargsian, similarly to the previous monitoring months, the neutral
connotation continued to prevail (403 references), yet the Prime Minister
took the first line in the list of 17 politicians in terms of positive
pieces (79 versus 12 negative ones).

In December on the Armenian air the negative references to the first RA
President Levon Ter-Petrosian continue to dominate. In other words, during
the last month of 2007 the unprecedented phenomenon, recorded in November,
continued when the share of neutral editorial coverage of an Armenian
politician quantitatively fell behind that of negative: 103 negative
references to Levon Ter-Petrosian versus 100 neutral ones and 4 positive
ones. At the same time the share of negative ones in the total number of
references has somewhat gone down in December – 49.8% versus 58.7% – in
November.

The leader of the Popular Party Tigran Karapetian, who took the first line
in terms of aggregate airtime on the channels studied in October-November,
was this time the second. However, in December, too, this volume of coverage
was ensured solely by one of the TV channels – "ALM", owned by Tigran
Karapetian himself: a bit more than 98% of the aggregate airtime he
received, as well as all 18 positive references to the leader of the Popular
Party, are accounted for by "ALM".

The broadcast media studied did not neglect in December the other six
candidates, nominated for presidential elections, either. Their coverage was
mostly neutral, and the TV and radio pieces primarily presented their
stances, opinions as candidates, heads of parties. In terms of aggregate
airtime the four leaders were directly followed by five presidential
candidates, leaders of parties that nominated them: Artashes Geghamian
("National Unity"), Vahan Hovhannesian ("Dashnaktsutiun"), Artur
Baghdasarian ("Orinats Yerkir"), Vazgen Manukian (National Democratic Union)
and Aram Harutiunian ("National Accord"), respectively. The ninth candidate,
self-nominated Arman Melikian, received less aggregate coverage. Gagik
Tsarukian, the leader of "Prosperous Armenia" party (member of ruling
coalition), who has taken the line after him and before other candidates in
the table, has received most of his aggregate airtime on "Kentron" TV
channel. It is important to note here, however, that in December Gagik
Tsarukian was only the fourth in terms of airtime, allocated to him by
"Kentron", while during the first months of the study his was the most
covered of all politicians at focus on this channel.

"ALM", SIMILARLY TO THE PREVIOUS MONTHS, is again the most "politicized" (in
terms of attention paid to politicians) of the broadcast channels studied
due to his owner. Tigran Karapetian received 70.1% of this channel’s whole
airtime, allocated to 17 politicians at focus in December. As compared to
"ALM", more than two and half times as little was the editorial coverage of
the politicians at focus on the Second Armenian TV Channel, followed by the
Public Radio of Armenia, "Kentron" and "Yerkir-Media" TV channels and the
First Channel of the Public Television of Armenia.

The least attention to the politicians at focus out of the 8 channels
monitored was paid by "Armenia" and "Shant". In terms of aggregate airtime
the leading four on these TV channels were Serge Sargsian, Robert Kocharian,
the Chairman of "National Unity" party Artashes Geghamian and Levon
Ter-Petrosian. The Prime Minister and the incumbent RA President took the
top lines on three other TV channels, too – the PTA First Channel, Second
Armenian TV Channel and "Kentron". Serge Sargsian and Robert Kocharian on
these TV channels are followed by Levon Ter-Petrosian, and on Public Radio
the first RA President was ahead of the incumbent head of state. Yet
Ter-Petrosian’s coverage on Public Radio was mostly negative (28 negative
references of 44 or 63.6%). In terms of negative references to the first
President Public Radio shared the leading position with "Kentron", yet on
the latter the share of the negativism is somewhat smaller (52.8% of the
total number of references). These TV channels account for more than half of
negative references to Ter-Petrosian, recorded under this research.

The picture on "Yerkir Media" is somewhat different from other channels.
Here the greatest editorial coverage was received by Vahan Hovhannesian, the
presidential candidate nominated by "Dashnaktsutiun". He is followed by two
other candidates, the leader of "National Accord" party Aram Harutiunian and
the leader of National Democratic Union Vazgen Manukian. Against the
background of generally balanced coverage of politicians at focus, in the
reporting of "Yerkir Media" two politicians stand out, with almost equal
number of references and a big proportion of connotationally colored: out of
24 references to Vahan Hovhannesian 10 are positive, and out 26 references
to Levon Ter-Petrosian 12 are negative. At the same time, unlike other TV
and radio channels studied in December, the coverage on "Yerkir Media" of
both Serge Sargsian’s and Robert Kocharian’s activities was purely neutral.

THE 17 POLITICIANS at focus were generally rare participants of "guest in
studio" programs. An obvious exception was made only by Tigran Karapetian,
but all 9 discussion programs in which he took part, were aired by his own
TV channel, "ALM". Out of the remaining 16 politicians only five (all
presidential candidates) took part in programs of this format in December.
As noted already at the previous stages of monitoring, the insufficient
representation of leading politicians on Armenian air, from both
pro-governmental and opposition camps, in some cases is due to their
closeness, reluctance to engage in dialogue with journalists, who raise
issues, sensitive for them. On their behalf the TV channels themselves are
not always active with regard to pre-election subject matter: in particular,
almost never have representatives of public organizations, seeking to ensure
democratic elections, become guests of discussion programs.

IN DECEMBER the advertising materials that directly or indirectly contribute
to the image of the politicians were only recorded on "Yerkir Media" TV
channel. On its air the several times the announcement about the festive
session devoted to the 117th anniversary of "Dashnaktsutiun" party, where
Vahan Hovhannesian was to speak, was broadcast.

It should also be noted that unlike October-November, on December air of the
channels studied the monitoring group has not recorded pieces broadcast as
editorial but having certain signs of advertising.

MONITORING METHODOLOGY:

All materials of the airtime studied were subdivided into two types:
1. Editorial coverage;
2. Paid programs and advertising/announcements (political, commercial,
public service).

1. The main study unit was TV/radio piece.

2. Monitors recorded and counted the references to politicians in the
editorial and paid coverage of the broadcast media studied. The number of
positive (+), negative (-) and neutral (0) references to politicians was
also counted. The connotational (positive, negative) references were seen to
be the ones in the pieces that leave an undoubtedly positive or negative
overall impression of the politician on the audience. In the cases when the
connotation was not that certain, the reference was recorded as neutral.
Each TV and radio piece recorded only one reference and only one
connotational sign for every politician. Any appearance of the politician in
the TV shot was also considered to be a reference.

3. The monitors also recorded and measured the material volume, i.e., the
airtime (in seconds), allocated to politicians for expressing their views,
opinions as well as judgments, narration about them made by others in
editorial and paid coverage of the broadcast media studied. Apart from
recording the general airtime, allocated to the politician, the capacity in
which the politician appeared was also studied. Thus, the airtime (in
seconds) was differentiated and classed appropriately, according to whether
it was allocated to the politician for the coverage of his:
1. Official and professional activities;
2. Activities that are not directly related to professional or official
duties.

4. The monitors recorded the participants of discussion programs
(interviews, guest in studio, talk shows) for the TV and radio channels
studied by a separate list, mentioning the TV and radio channel, the title
of the program, the name(s) and position(s) of the participants invited.

>From JANUARY 21 Yerevan Press Club started to monitor the coverage of
presidential elections of 2008 by broadcast media of Armenia. The monitoring
covers the period of pre-election promotion (January 21 – February 17,
2008).

CEC APPROVED THE PROCEDURE FOR THE PROVISION OF AIR TO PRESIDENCY CANDIDATES
BY PUBLIC BROADCASTERS

On January 21 the RA Central Election Commission made a resolution on the
procedure and the schedule of air provision by public television and public
radio to Armenian presidential candidates for their pre-election promotion.

The succession of candidates’ access to air is defined by schedule made
through random selection and approved by CEC. The air for pre-election
promotion is provided to candidates daily – from January 23 to February 17.
The political advertising is broadcast on the First Channel of the Public
Television of Armenia, and on frequencies 69.77 MHz, 1395 kHz and the
nationwide FM network of Public Radio of Armenia; the public broadcasters
ensure the parallel broadcasting on the air of "Shirak" public TV and radio
company. The broadcasting of pre-election promotion of public television
starts at 17.15, on public radio – at 13.30. In case of technical necessity
the public broadcasters may shift the timeframes specified, but not more
than 30 minutes.

On the public television each presidential candidate is entitled to 60
minutes of free and 120 minutes of paid airtime. The duration of daily air
for each of the candidates is defined as follows: a) during the period of
January 23 – February 10 – 2 minutes of free and up to 4 minutes of paid
airtime; b) February 11-16 – 3 minutes of free and up to 6 minutes of paid
airtime; c) February 17, the last day of pre-election promotion – 4 minutes
of free and up to 8 minutes of paid airtime.

On public radio each presidential candidate is allocated 120 minutes of free
and 180 minutes of paid airtime. The duration of daily air for each of the
candidates is defined as follows: a) during the period of January 23 –
February 10 – 4 minutes of free and up to 6 minutes of paid airtime; b)
February 11-16 – 6 minutes of free and up to 9 minutes of paid airtime; c)
February 17 – 8 minutes of free and up to 12 minutes of paid airtime.

If any of the candidates fails to use the time, allocated to him by the
schedules, no make-up time is given. The airtime, allocated to one
candidate, cannot be used by another candidate.

Public broadcasters give live air to the candidates, also with a host should
they wish so, or broadcast video, audio clips, provided by presidency
candidates.

ARSON ATTEMPT OF "ASPAREZ" OFFICE

In the early morning of January 19 at about 5.00 an attempt to set "Asparez"
Journalist’s Club of Gyumri on fire was made. A piece of cloth, soaked in
petrol and burning, was thrown at one of the windows of "Asparez" office. As
a result, part of the window burned and the glasses cracked. In the report
of the incident, placed on January 22 on the web-site of "Asparez", it is
noted that the Club resolved not to address the police (proceeding from the
fact that the investigations into the cases of attempted trespassing on the
property of the organization and its staff in 2002-2006 yielded no result).
Meanwhile, as YPC was told by "Asparez" Board Chairman Levon Barseghian, the
Gyumri police department started the investigative measures.

"ARAVOT" PUBLISHED A REFUTATION OF ITS ARTICLE ABOUT "ARMENIA" TV COMPANY

On January 19 "Aravot" daily refuted article "Has the ‘Alliance’ of the
Gafesjians and the Sargsians Failed?" published in "Aravot" on January 11,
2008 (see YPC Weekly Newsletter, January 11-17, 2008). The refutation titled
"In reality ‘Armenia’ Flourishes" says the information about "Armenia" TV
company, published in the daily on January 11, is untrue. According to the
newspaper, the publication of the refutation is the result of a written
agreement, reached between "Aravot" and "Armenia".

"CAPITAL" BECOMES A DAILY

Since January 22 "Capital" business weekly became a daily newspaper. It is
issued five times a week on 8 A2 pages. The Chief Editor of "Capital" is
Karen Harutiunian.

SEDRAK DAVIDIAN PASSED AWAY

On January 18 at the age of 45 the music editor of CITY FM station Sedrak
Davidian (DJ Sedrak) passed away.

Yerevan Press Club expresses its condolences to the family and friends of
Sedrak Davidian.

WORKING MEETING OF ARMENIAN AND TURKISH JOURNALISTS IN ISTANBUL

On January 19-21 in Istanbul a workshop was held, in which the journalists
selected through a competition in Armenia and Turkey took part (see YPC
Weekly Newsletter, November 9-15, 2007). The event was organized under
Armenian-Turkish team investigative reporting project, implemented by
Yerevan Press Club and ARI Movement (Turkey) with the support of Eurasia
Foundation. The project aims to produce high quality stories about issues of
mutual concern. At the seminar the principles of joint work were discussed,
the subjects of future publications and organizational issues regarding the
investigations to be made.

On January 19 the Armenian journalists took part in the manifestation in
Istanbul to commemorate the Chief Editor of the two-language
Turkish-Armenian "Agos" newspaper Hrant Dink, shot dead a year ago by his
editorial office.

PERSPECTIVE
MEMORY OF HRANT DINK DESERVES MORE THAN JUST SORROW

A year has passed since the assassination of Hrant Dink. The manifestation
in Istanbul by the editorial office of his newspaper, "Agos", brought
together about as many people (by various estimated up to 100,000) as the
funeral of the journalist in January 2007. The same slogans "We are all
Hrant Dink, we are all Armenian", the same sense of unification among people
who feel grateful to Hrant and who mourn their loss, the same emotional
speeches about democracy, tolerance.

Both the funeral and the manifestation a year later were covered by a whole
range of media – Turkish and foreign, also Armenian. This means that the
whole world got another chance to stop and think about the values that Hrant
was committed to and the challenge made by the shots of the young fanatic.
Hatred and violence cannot be a way of solving problems. Freedom is worth
fighting for. Cowardice and true journalism hardly ever go together. The
people, the public, the power must treat those few uncompromising in their
fight for dignity and justice with care, even if their being uncompromising
is sometimes "uncomfortable" for others.

But have these values gained more respect in countries that were
particularly dear to Hrant Dink during the past year? In Turkey where he
lived and that he was a true citizen of, and in Armenia, that was getting
increasingly important in his life after he was finally allowed to travel
abroad? The rapprochement of the two nations was turning into one of the
main subjects in the work of the journalist, playing a fatal role for him.
Unfortunately, the loss that the honest and reasonable part of mankind
suffered is far from becoming a lesson to us. And the problem is certainly
not the small provocations, made in Istanbul by nationalists on the
anniversary of Hrant Dink’s death.

In Turkey Dink’s son is brought to court for re-publishing an article by his
father in "Agos". Extremists threaten to kill a Turkish journalist for his
words "Hrant Dink was killed by the poison in our blood", alluding to the
well-known phrase that prompted Hrant’s prosecution by notorious Article 301
of the Penal Code of Turkey. In Armenia attempts are made to glorify Dink
through slogans like "1.5 million plus 1 victim of Genocide" that the
journalist himself would have certainly strongly challenged. The favorable
stance towards any Armenian politician, expressed in Turkish press, may be
used by some Armenian media to discredit this politician…

And what did the "honest and reasonable part of mankind" put forth to
counter this absurdity? The International Press Institute named Hrant Dink
the World Press Freedom Hero. The journalist’s name was recalled on a number
of other festive occasions. But his real commemoration would have been the
action – at least a very small contribution to what he had been dreaming
about, a small but a real step to mutual understanding of Armenians and
Turks. If not on behalf of the governments of the two countries that are
unready for this, then at least on behalf of the civil societies, his
colleagues in journalism. With unjustified expectations but persevering
hopes we stepped into the second year after Hrant Dink was killed. With
hopes that on January 19, 2009 those who would come to the manifestation
will be united not only in their sorrow but also in their optimism in future
that was so lacking presently.

Boris NAVASARDIAN

When reprinting or using the information above, reference to the Yerevan
Press Club is required.

You are welcome to send any comment and feedback about the Newsletter to:
[email protected]

Subscription for the Newsletter is free. To subscribe or unsubscribe from
this mailing list, please send a message to: [email protected]

Editor of YPC Newsletter – Elina POGHOSBEKIAN
_____________________________________ _______
Yerevan Press Club
9B, Ghazar Parpetsi str.
0002, Yerevan, Armenia
Tel.: (+ 374 10) 53 00 67; 53 35 41; 53 76 62
Fax: (+374 10) 53 56 61
E-mail: [email protected]
Web Site:

www.ypc.am