Verelq: The new manipulation of “war” and “peace”.

“Fact” daily writes:

Yesterday, we can say, once again, Nikol Pashinyan terrorized the Armenian people with war. Moreover, Pashinyan mentioned a specific date: September. It is clear why September, because when Pashinyan is rejected after the June 7 elections, the formation of a new government will take place at that time.

In practice, Pashinyan constantly threatens war if he is rejected. Yesterday, the Foreign Minister of Pashinyan’s cabinet repeated the same threats in the National Assembly. But what does this mean?

Many questions are being asked about this these days. For example, does this mean an open hint to Azerbaijan to attack Armenia so that Nikol Pashinyan does not lose power? Or does this mean that Pashinyan has some deeper and more terrible concession agreements with Aliyev, after which Azerbaijan will “come” if Pashinyan is no longer in power? In the case of these authorities, nothing can be ruled out. However, whatever happens, it is actually understandable that Pashinyan is just terrorizing the people of Armenia, presenting himself as a “force of peace” and others as a “force of war”. At one time, in 1998, they said: “to war party” defeated the “peace party”, after that there was 20 years of peace. And when, so to speak, the “light” version “bringing peace” came to power, a war broke out shortly after. Wars. It turns out that “peace parties” bring war, “war parties” bring peace?

Pashinyan uses the topic of war to get votes before the elections, to play on the public’s emotions, to terrorize the public and to exploit those emotions.

Yes, by the way, in terms of knowing the date of the start of the war, Pashinyan says: I’ve been prime minister for so many years, I don’t know that either? What does this mean? In other words, did he learn about the start of the war in 2020 (was he warned)? Maybe he knows the day of the attack on Jermuk? It’s an interesting situation, isn’t it?

—