March: 24, 2026
Armen Ashotyan writes: “This is the real image of the Turkish servant looking for the 5th column.”
Nikol Pashinyan is a traitor, based on the processes taking place in RA in the run-up to the 44-day war, Nikol Pashinyan’s deliberate mistakes, stupidities, ignorant or deliberate decisions of the main traitorous degree shown during the war.
However, Nikol Pashinyan is also a traitor with the justifications immediately after November 9, 2020.
And so, Nikol Pashinyan is a traitor from November 9, 2020 to March 2023, because.
1. Only the traitor, who became not so much a symbol (calling the ear of the attache) of defeat, as a reason, could continue to make efforts to stay at the helm of government.
2. Only a traitor could resort to such provocations to accomplish this, which instead of uniting the public and relieving them of stress, further agitated the already stressed Armenian society, leading to greater polarization and a deepening sense of injustice.
3. Only a traitor could include his own petty interest in the service chain of geopolitical interests and lead the country to senseless early elections.
4. Only a traitor could make promises on the eve of those elections, which he knew from the beginning that he would not fulfill.
In particular, on the issue of Artsakh: the right to self-determination, de-occupation, etc.
5. Only a traitor with his political existence could “put a tongue” in the mouth of Azerbaijani President Aliyev after the elections, that he received a “capitulation mandate”, that the Armenian people digested the capitulation of November 9 and sent a sinister message to the international community on behalf of the Armenian people that with 680,000 dated “for” votes, this nation is ready to enter the political history in the 21st century as the only and exclusive one. non-caste nation.
6. Only a traitor could not raise the issue of the legal and sanctions consequences of the Azerbaijani-Turkish aggression in the 44-day war in any international instance.
7. Only a traitor could not make any effort to “hurt” Azerbaijan and Turkey in any international forum.
8. Only a traitor could forget the fact of Turkey bringing militants from the Middle East, recorded by international structures.
9. Only a traitor could condone Azerbaijan’s war crimes and not take any practical steps to implement international punitive mechanisms.
10. Only a traitor could contribute to the Azerbaijani policy by agreeing to the approaches of some mediators, for example, to eliminate the concept of “Nagorno Karabakh” from the documents.
11. Only a traitor could replace “the right to self-determination of the people of Artsakh” with the term “rights and security of the Armenian population of Nagorno-Karabakh”.
12. Only a traitor could throw the responsibility of the security and future of Artsakh people into the “pocket” of others, particularly Russia, contrary to the plan of his own government.
13. Only a traitor could regularly give “hatatas” to the people of Artsakh and tolerate “140. 000 vs. 3 million”, the divisive and Turkish propaganda theses generated by their own team.
14. Only a traitor could turn Armenia into a battlefield of geopolitical giants.
15. Only a traitor could, against the background of this geopolitical tension, make efforts to cool down the problem, not enter into geopolitical games, but instead of waiting for the final decision of the fate of the IC Co-Chairs Institute, enter into separate negotiations.
16. Only a traitor could show less caress and affection towards the defeated army after the shameful defeat on November 9 than towards the police, whose officers could only dream of the rewards and material security that Armenian soldiers and officers received.
17. Only a traitor could agree after November 9 and justify through the stinking lips of his own teammates that GPS delimitation and demarcation is OK.
18. Only a traitor could give up and give up the Goris-Kapan road so easily.
19. Only a traitor could tolerate, encourage and participate in many corruption risks after the war along with various other members of his team.
20. Only a traitor could divide the society even more with actions of abuse of the law enforcement system instead of the atmosphere of public solidarity (due to his provocative, political considerations).
21. Only a traitor could continuously destroy the pillars of national identity: church, family, morality, etc.
It was also treason:
* ceding 200 square kilometers in Kubatli and Zangelan, not foreseen by the November 9 announcement,
* handing over Azerbaijani prisoners of war and persons who committed murders unrelated to the war until the return of the last Armenian prisoners of war.
* the issue of prisoners of war “escape”
* not providing minimal conditions to the army on the Armenian-Azerbaijani contact line,
* Abandoning the fundamental principles of the Central Committee and bringing the “undrunk” Almaty Declaration of 1991 to the Maidan.
* Failure to respond to Aliyev’s personal insults and political insults.
As you can see, the evidence and testimonies about the betrayal of Nikol Pashinyan are more than enough both before and during the 44-day war, and especially immediately after the war.
Well, let me not remind you about his treacherous decisions and behavior in 2023-26. Perhaps you still remember.”
—
Disclaimer: This article was contributed and translated into English by Emil Lazarian. While we strive for quality, the views and accuracy of the content remain the responsibility of the contributor. Please verify all facts independently before reposting or citing.
Direct link to this article: https://www.armenianclub.com/2026/03/25/nikol-pashinyan-is-a-traitor-armen-ashotyan/
