The guest of the “Zara has a question” program of 168 TV is public speaker, analyst Harut Uloyan.

Below are some theses expressed by Harut Uloyan during the interview․

• By and large, nothing should be expected from the CC. naturally, the Constitutional Court will ultimately reject the results recorded by the CEC. There, the issue of PAP votes will remain in 3 precincts, but, as I understand, the CC does not have the authority to make a decision regarding those specific precincts. So, they will bypass that question and only record the instruction sent down from above.

• Actually, it is not about a few hundred votes. it’s about a few 1000 votes, if not about tens and hundreds-thousands of votes, because Pashinyan himself states that 70% of the opposition’s votes are falsified votes, right?

• Pashinyan has crossed all boundaries long ago: winner-non-winner, loser-non-loser. he announces what is beneficial to him at that moment. He crossed all the boundaries of that cynicism and red lines. now, in a cynical way, whatever you want, he declares. During the question-and-answer session with the government, he already proudly states that he made the statement, “Artsakh is Armenia, and that’s it,” because if he hadn’t, we wouldn’t be in such a wonderful place now. A person stands up, makes a cynical “crap” on that topic.

• If you declare that the most important issue is not to remove Pashinyan, but who will come to power after Pashinyan, you equate the agenda of removing Pashinyan to zero.

• The sentiments of the street struggle should have been generated from the pre-election period. they should talk to the people about what they will do in case of falsification, what they will do during this process. Basically, the main layers of the society question the legitimacy, but no one does anything to mature, generate, in this case, take to the streets those moods of the people. If it is not done now, then I can’t imagine.

• The opposition lost that moment. If there is such a possibility, it seems to me that it will be more within the framework of some geopolitical context, or some social one, in this case, I don’t know where the relations with Russia will go, and I think the most likely scenario is that Russia will start applying some kind of pressure or some kind of sanctions against Armenia. But as a result of Pashinyan’s skillful manipulation, it can be used in some domestic formulations.

• I am sure that the issue of removing the Russian military base will be raised, especially in the context of Armenian-Turkish relations, and, in my impression, if the border has not been opened, the primary issue is, of course, that condition or precondition.

• Pashinyan, I don’t know why, has turned “it” into some kind of anti-patriotic tool, he is trying to solve issues that don’t exist at all through Ararat. In other words, he brought some question out of thin air and is trying to aggravate the situation under it. So let them build a wall along the Armenia-Turkey border so that we don’t see the sight of Mount Ararat.

• I understand that there may be problems with Russia, that Armenia may be upset by Russia’s positions on some issues, etc., but it is incomprehensible to me that our people are normal to the fact that in all these processes, Armenia has, in fact, become a geopolitical tool. In other words, we are not trying to solve these issues with Russia, but, to put it bluntly, “we are bringing a boy”. To the West, against Russia.

Details in the video.

—