Kocharyan Discusses Diaspora Repatriation, Economic Policy, And Political Part

On March 26, Robert Kocharyan, the leader of the Armenia bloc, stated during a meeting with repatriates that although Armenia once began from a weak position in rebuilding ties with its diaspora, those relations were later significantly strengthened, bringing clear mutual benefits. He emphasized that while the diaspora represents a powerful resource, it simultaneously facilitates emigration, as Armenians abroad often provide networks that make leaving easier if domestic conditions are unfavorable. According to Kocharyan, the key to encouraging repatriation lies in creating a secure, stable, and positive environment within Armenia, as a negative atmosphere inevitably drives people to leave rather than return.

He stressed that past progress in diaspora relations was less the result of formal state programs and more due to the general environment that made relocation appealing. Recalling his time in office, Kocharyan noted that he encouraged diaspora Armenians to establish property in Armenia, and many responded by investing and opening businesses. “Whenever I heard that an Armenian from the diaspora was opening a restaurant, I would always visit them… to show that we… welcome all of this,” he stated. He argued that the country should now enter a new phase, where repatriation is actively supported through structured state policies.

Referring to international examples, Kocharyan highlighted Israel as a leading case with its repatriation law and comprehensive integration programs, describing it as a model worth considering. He also pointed out that Armenia has its own historical experience, particularly during the Soviet period between 1945 and 1949, when around 100,000 Armenians were resettled from abroad with full state support, including transportation and housing. The majority remained in the country, forming lasting communities, which, according to him, demonstrates that large-scale repatriation policies can succeed when properly managed.

Addressing economic policy, Kocharyan explained that simplified taxation was introduced to support the strong entrepreneurial drive among Armenians. He noted that in 1998 small and medium-sized businesses accounted for only 13% of GDP, but later expanded to 46% as a result of supportive measures. He expressed his ambition to increase this share to 70%, proposing further simplification so that small business owners could operate without bureaucratic burdens or frequent contact with tax authorities. “This approach… has yielded tremendous results,” Kocharyan emphasized, adding that modern tools such as smartphones could further ease compliance.

Kocharyan also underlined the importance of aligning economic policy with Armenia’s social and cultural characteristics. He argued that Armenians tend to favor family-based businesses over corporate structures, and policies should reflect these preferences to maximize efficiency. He linked this thinking to past constitutional reforms, noting that earlier legal frameworks restricted such flexibility, prompting him to pursue changes.

Turning to political participation, Kocharyan addressed restrictions on dual citizens holding office, stating that such limitations stem from concerns common in smaller states about external influence. However, he argued that the current rules in Armenia are overly restrictive, particularly the requirement for individuals to renounce foreign citizenship years in advance before entering parliament. While acknowledging the risks, he suggested that a balanced approach is needed to allow repatriated Armenians to engage in political life without raising doubts about their loyalties.

He illustrated this point by referencing the case of Vardan Oskanyan, who, he noted, served effectively for a decade despite circumstances that would prevent such an appointment under current regulations. Kocharyan proposed that restrictions could remain in sensitive sectors such as national security, while being relaxed in less critical areas.

Concluding his remarks, Kocharyan stressed that Armenia’s global influence depends significantly on leveraging its diaspora, stating that a country connected to its diaspora operates in a different “weight class” compared to one that is not. “If you want to be a small country but a major player, you must utilize all these opportunities,” he emphasized.

https://caucasuswatch.de/en/news/kocharyan-discusses-diaspora-repatriation-economic-policy-and-political-participation.html