Soccer: Armenian national team starts training camp

Panorama, Armenia
Sep 1 2020
Sport 19:33 01/09/2020Armenia

The Armenian national football team started a training camp ahead of UEFA Nations League C league group 2 matches against North Macedonia and Estonia, the Football Federation reports.

According to the source, the team started the trainings on September 1 at the FFA Technical Center. The players underwent tests before the training.

As reported earlier, Head coach Joaquin Caparros called up 23 players as part of the preparation. Gevorg Ghazaryan and Sargis Adamyan are not available to join the team due to injuries, while Henrikh Mkhitaryan is absent being on vacation.


RFE/RL Armenian Report – 09/01/2020

                                        Tuesday, September 1, 2020

Two Killed In Brandy Distillery Blast

        • Robert Zargarian

Armenia -- A firefighter and a worker at a brandy distillery in Armavir hit by a 
deadly explosion, September 1, 2020

An explosion rocked a brandy distillery in Armenia on Tuesday, killing two 
people and seriously injuring four others.

The Armenian Ministry of Emergency Situations said rescuers sent by it there by 
needed about an hour to extinguish a fire caused by the explosion, which blew up 
a large reservoir filled with alcohol. They then recovered the dead bodies of 
the two victims.

One of the victims was the executive director of the distillery located in 
Armavir province west of Yerevan while the other managed a construction team 
working at its premises.

Four other people suffered severe burns and were rushed to a provincial 
hospital. They were transferred to Yerevan later in the day. The Armenian 
Ministry of Health described their condition as critical.

The Armavir distillery employing more than 200 people is a local division of the 
Proshian Cognac Factory, a major Armenian brandy producer. Its owner, Armen 
Gasparian, told RFE/RL’s Armenian service that the blast was likely caused by 
welding carried out dangerously close to the alcohol reservoir.

Armenia’s Investigative Committee echoed that explanation, saying that the 
welders appear to have violated safety rules. The law-enforcement body said it 
has launched an inquiry into criminal negligence.



Yerevan Rejects Parallels Between Belarus Protests, Armenian Revolution


BELARUS – Opposition supporters march through the center of Minsk, August 23, 
2020

Foreign Minister Zohrab Mnatsakanian has dismissed comparisons between 
continuing anti-government protests in Belarus and a popular uprising that 
toppled Armenia’s former government in 2018.

The mass protests in the capital Minsk and other parts of Belarus were sparked 
by a disputed election the official results of which gave a landslide victory to 
Alexander Lukashenko, the country’s authoritarian president. Lukashenko denies 
opposition allegations that he rigged the August 9 ballot to prolong his 26-year 
rule.

Some commentators see glaring similarities the Belarusian demonstrations and 
nationwide protests which were triggered by former Armenian President Serzh 
Sarkisian’s attempt to hold on to power after completing his second and final 
presidential term in April 2018. The peaceful protests known as the “Velvet 
Revolution” paralyzed much of Armenia, forced Sarkisian to resign and brought 
protest leader Nikol Pashinian to power.

Mnatsakanian rejected such parallels in an interview with the Russian Interfax 
news agency published late on Monday.

“Armenia followed its own path and it’s not quite correct to draw parallels 
based on that,” he said. “True, there might be some common parameters, but on 
the whole these are different situations.”


ARMENIA -- Protesters react listening to their leader Nikol Pashinyan on 
Republic Square in Yerevan, April 26, 2018

“The most important thing is to accept and acknowledge that a solution to the 
issue is the prerogative of the people of Belarus. We very much hope that this 
situation will be resolved peacefully,” he added.

Asked whether Armenia recognizes Lukashenko as Belarus’s legitimate leader, 
Mnatsakanian said: “Prime Minister Pashinian congratulated the president of 
Belarus … We intend to continue working with Belarus in all directions both 
within the framework of bilateral relations and in international formats.”

Pashinian’s congratulatory message to Lukashenko was denounced by Armenian civil 
society activists and opposition figures. Some of them accused the prime 
minister of turning a blind eye to a brutal crackdown on Belarusian protesters 
launched by security forces right after the disputed election. Pashinian’s 
political allies defended the congratulation, implicitly citing Armenia’s 
geopolitical interests.


Kazakhstan - Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko (L) and Armenian Prime 
Minister Nikol Pashinian talk at a CSTO summit in Astana, 8 November 2018.

Both Armenia and Belarus are members of the Russian-led Collective Security 
Treaty Organization (CSTO) and Eurasian Economic Union. Russia is increasingly 
showing support for Lukashenko despite President Vladimir Putin’s uneasy 
relationship with the Belarusian strongman.

Faced with the biggest challenge yet to his rule, Lukashenko has accused the 
West of funding the protests and massing NATO forces on Belarusian frontiers. He 
has said he might need military assistance from Russia and the CSTO.

Mnatsakanian would not be drawn on a possible CSTO intervention in ongoing 
developments in Belarus. He argued that the Belarusian government has not 
requested it so far.



Former Armenian Security Chief Insists On Regime Change

        • Gayane Saribekian

Armenia -- Former National Security Service Director Artur Vanetsian is 
interviewed by Armenian newspaper editors, Yerevan, February 5, 2020.

Artur Vanetsian, the former National Security Service (NSS) director leading a 
new opposition party, on Tuesday reaffirmed his plans to try to oust Armenia’s 
current government and said he may organize street protests for that purpose.

Vanetsian said regime change is the principal aim of his Hayrenik (Fatherland) 
party’s continuing “very active discussions” with two other major opposition 
groups: the Armenian Revolutionary Federation (Dashnaktsutyun) and the 
Prosperous Armenia Party (BHK).

“[Prime Minister] Nikol Pashinian’s and his government’s every new day in power 
is ruinous for Armenia,” he told RFE/RL’s Armenian service in an interview. “We 
are ready to cooperate with almost all political forces over this agenda.”

Asked about the possibility of anti-government protests, he said: “Rallies and 
other mass protests are an integral part of a political process. We will 
definitely use that instrument if need be and at the right moment.”

Vanetsian predicted in late July that “very active political processes” possibly 
involving street protests will unfold in Armenia soon. He sounded more cautious 
on that score on Tuesday.

“A politically heated autumn is definitely expected but I wouldn’t link times of 
the year with politics,” he said. “For us, for the Hayrenik party, the last few 
months have already been heated.”


Armenia - Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian (L) and National Security Service 
Director Artur Vanetsian visit the Football Academy in Yerevan, March 25, 2019.

Vanetsian, 40, was appointed as head of the NSS immediately the 2018 “Velvet 
Revolution” that brought Pashinian to power. He quickly became an influential 
member of Pashinian’s entourage, overseeing high-profile corruption 
investigations initiated by Armenia’s new leadership.

Vanetsian resigned in September 2019 after falling out with the prime minister 
for still unclear reasons. He has since repeatedly accused Pashinian of 
incompetence and misrule, prompting angry responses from the premier and his 
political allies. Some of them have accused the former NSS chief of cooperating 
with the country’s former rulers overthrown in 2018.

In late June, Hayrenik, the BHK and Dashnaktsutyun pledged to work together in 
challenging the government. The move followed criminal charges brought against 
BHK leader Gagik Tsarukian. The latter rejects them as politically motivated.


Armenia -- The Hayrenik party led by former National Security Service Director 
Artur Vanetsian holds a founding congress, Yerevan, May 31, 2020.
Addressing supporters on August 28, Tsarukian again criticized the government’s 
response to the coronavirus pandemic and other policies. He also announced plans 
to hold a “big rally” soon.

A Dashnaktsutyun leader, Ishkhan Saghatelian, also remained critical of 
Pashinian’s administration when he spoke to RFE/RL’s Armenian service on 
Tuesday. Saghatelian claimed that the prime minister has failed to deliver on 
his promises given to Armenians during the 2018 revolution. The current 
authorities can boast of very few tangible achievements, he said.

Pashinian and his political team will strongly disagree. They say, among other 
things, that they have significantly strengthened the rule of law and 
successfully addressed widespread corruption in the country.

Vanetsian scoffed at such statements, claiming credit for the most important 
corruption cases opened since 2018.

“Let them give a single example of any corrupt former official brought to 
justice after my resignation,” he said. “I can list several cases where 
individuals arrested and prosecuted by me have been set free and are now freely 
moving around Armenia.”

Vanetsian had overseen the NSS’s corruption investigations into former President 
Serzh Sarkisian’s notorious brother Aleksandr and former chief bodyguard 
Vachagan Ghazarian. The ex-president and his fugitive son-in-law Mikael Minasian 
were indicted on separate corruption charges after Vanetsian’s resignation. Both 
men strongly deny the accusations.



11 Die From Alcohol Poisoning In Armenia


Armenia -- An ambulance races through streets of Yerevan, June 2, 2020.

Eleven people have died and several others have been hospitalized over the past 
two days after drinking bootleg alcohol in Armenia, the Ministry of Health said 
on Tuesday.
Three of the hospitalized individuals are in a critical condition, the ministry 
reported in a statement. It suggested that they were poisoned by bootleg vodka.

According to the statement, most of the victims are residents of Armavir, a town 
46 kilometers west of Yerevan.

Another Armavir resident, a 50-year-old man identified as Ashot Hovsepian, was 
arrested on Tuesday on suspicion of illegally producing and selling alcohol.

Armenia’s Investigative Committee said it is now trying to identify other people 
who have bought alcohol from Hovsepian. The law-enforcement agency urged them to 
avoid drinking it and to cooperate with investigators.

The Ministry of Health also reported efforts to “ascertain the circle of 
consumers of the alcoholic beverage” sold by the suspect. Health authorities 
have taken samples of the beverage determine its chemical composition through 
laboratory tests, said the ministry.


Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2020 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.

 


A step, this time a big step, backwards

 

There were some people who used to say that the resolution of the Karabagh conflict should have priority, without procrastination, on the basis of mutual concessions, that without the resolution of that conflict it will be impossible to resolve the other problems, that delaying the resolution of that conflict our independence would be endangered, that is, we would lose the possibility of solving our problems on the basis of our own interests.
There were also people who insisted that it is not necessary to resolve the Karabagh conflict as an urgent matter, that we are able to continue as we are, that we could us the time to create a strong state and then obtain our maximum demands, that we have the time to first resolve our other problems.
Some people even argued that the problem was solved already.
There were people who indicated that  the outcome of wars is often unpredictable, that the heroism of our soldiers and the patriotism of our army were not sufficient to secure victory; they pointed out that it was dangerous to adopt the concept of “permanent war” as the way of the future. There were also people for whom such a problem did not even exist; those who were happy that the enemy was repelled in July and thought, therefore, that that is how it was going to be, always. The end.
Ten or so days ago, at the end of a webinar that assessed the Velvet Revolution, I insisted that all attempts to bring democracy, the rule of law, and sustained economic development to Armenia were condemned to failure without a resolution of the Karabagh problem.
And where are we now, at the beginning of September 2020?
I my view, our ability to influence the resolution of the Karabagh conflict has diminished by a significant measure due to recent developments.
What has occurred in the recent period to justify such a statement?
A few things:
A. Azerbaijan was unable to score a victory on the battlefield in July, but it turned that defeat into the most significant diplomatic victory by convincing Turkey that its defeat was also Turkey’s defeat, thus engaging Turkey fully in the problem.
B. Last month Armenia made the Sevres Treaty an important part of the country’s foreign policy. For Turkey that became the most important part. I don’t know if our leaders did so knowingly, but the statements by the President and Prime Minister of Armenia were equivalent to a declaration of at least diplomatic war against Turkey. And that, against the Turkey with a dangerous leader such as Erdogan. Adopting the Treaty of Sevres as an instrument of foreign policy Armenia placed the demand of territories from Turkey on its agenda. This was possibly the last step that will, in the eyes of our opponents and the international community, define the Karabagh problem as a question of territorial expansion, setting aside the right of self-determination of our people in Artsakh  as the basis of our policy. And that revanchist approach depends so much on the sympathy of that same international community to see its demands satisfied. That which is considered “the solution to the Armenian Question” by some is regarded by the international community as inane, at the least. Is it not time to stop harming our chances of resolving the real problems we face with what we say and do for internal consumption?
C. These declarations were followed by the statement of the Minister of Defense of Turkey, who declared that henceforth Turkey considered itself a party to the Karabagh conflict. That means that (a) now the conflict is between, on one side, Armenia and Artsakh against Azerbaijan and Turkey, on the other side, and (b) Turkey is declaring that it is now ready to provide additional support to Azerbaijan, although it is not clear what form that new support will take. It is necessary to note, nonetheless, that this statement was not made by the minister of Foreign Affairs or any other functionary, but by the Minister of Defense.
And this is just the beginning.
What will Armenia and Artsakh do in such an eventuality. Some people can scream that all of this shows how evil Turkey and Turks are. But these screams will not change the new reality. Also, such people forget that they were the ones who were also screaming that Turkey is a party to the conflict and should be removed from the Minsk Group since it provided unconditional support for Azerbaijan. At any rate, whatever our screams, whatever our adjectives to describe Erdogan, Turkey and Turks, the fact remains that now we must visualize the possibility of confronting Turkey directly, in addition to Azerbaijan.
Of course, it is possible to argue that the statement by Turkey is simply  an idle threat, that Turkey would never dare undertake military hostilities against Armenia because Armenia has a treaty of mutual defense with Russia. But such an argument can be made only if one forgets that this treaty, as all such treaties, provide first for consultations between Armenia and Russia, that Russia would not get into a war with Turkey automatically if that happens.
It is most probable that during this process, to dissipate the threat presented by Turkey, at a convenient moment, Russia will present demands for concessions from the Armenian side, concession which Moscow has been expecting from Yerevan for a long time. The questions are (a) to what extent will these concessions correspond to our minimal interests; clearly they will have nothing to do with our maximal demands, and (b) can Armenia resist such demands?
It is true that the defense of Armenia’s borders with Turkey are in Russia’s interests as well. But that does not mean that Russia will not extract concessions from us in return, as it has done since the beginning.
We have forgotten how we lost the First Republic of Armenia. There was the Turkish-Russian cooperation. There also was the pursuit of the Treaty of Sevres. Then, as now, we became obsessed with our dreams instead of focusing on the possible, and we lost part of what was possible. More, we lost our independence.
In other words, all of this was predictable and predicted.
Is it possible that the people who for over two decades could find no reason to expedite the resolution of the conflict have not thought of such a possibility? If they have not, that means they really have not understand the problem or have not taken the factors in play seriously enough. And if they have been thinking about these factors seriously but still refused to adopt a policy that responds to the situation, then they deserve a far more serious accusation. I will not go into details in this regard at this time.
I will add that to ascribe the responsibility for the failure of negotiations on Azerbaijan and Turkey alone is denying our own mistakes, to which we just added the adoption of the Treaty of Sevres as the foundation of our relations with our neighbors. I am confident that we have not done everything to normalize those relations. The “Armenian Case” mentality and revanchism seem to ensure that the list of these mistakes will grow longer and that we will not be thinking seriously as to what we must say and do and what we must not say or do to preserve our people and our statehood.
As has been the case with my earlier analyses, I do hope I am wrong. But as time goes I am more convinced that the scenario about which I have written and spoken a few times during the past decades, is already taking a clearer shape today.
Jirair Libaridian
September 1, 2020

https://www.aravot-en.am/2020/09/01/263436/
Armenian at: https://www.aravot.am/2020/09/01/1132491/

AGBU Press Office: Apply Now – 2021 Creative Armenia-AGBU Fellowships

AGBU Press Office
55 East 59th Street
New York, NY 10022-1112
Website: 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.agbu.org__;!!LIr3w8kk_Xxm!-UpJq6vSz7PUSXeOpr703pkt7wZLhSW_1NC-7GYYfTV4Ui4XLggQfXrWIbLyBA$
 
  
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
  
Monday, 
  
APPLY NOW: 2021 CREATIVE ARMENIA-AGBU FELLOWSHIPS Calling cutting-edge artists 
to the forefront of Armenia's cultural future

Creative Armenia and the Armenian General Benevolent Union (AGBU) are now 
accepting applications for the 2021 Creative Armenia-AGBU Fellowships. Open to 
filmmakers, musicians, writers, and artists across all creative fields, the 
Fellowships are a package of funding, mentorship, promotion, and strategic 
support. Applications will be accepted until October 31.

"In times of crisis, visionary thinking becomes impossible to ignore," said Alec 
Mouhibian, Vice President of Creative Armenia. "The next class of Creative 
Armenia-AGBU Fellows will have a singular opportunity to shape Armenia's 
artistic landscape for years to come."  

The current 2020 Fellows are: composer and musician Armen Bazarian; visual 
artist and curator Nvard Yerkanian; theatre director and dancer Tsolak 
Mlke-Galstyan; composer and conductor Alexandr Iradyan; composer and pianist 
Zela Margossian, and filmmaker Vahagn Khachatryan. 

"Our Fellows have shown diversity in their creativity and expression over the 
past few years putting Armenian culture on the map in their unique ways," said 
AGBU Central Board Member Ani Manoukian. "We are proud of the achievements of 
this partnership and of the talents supported. We look forward to the third 
cohorts setting the bar even higher."

For more information on the Fellowships and to submit your application by 
October 31, please visit creativearmenia.org/fellowships and 
agbu.org/creativearmenia.

Now in its third term, the Fellowships are a collaboration of Creative Armenia 
and AGBU, which entered into a strategic partnership in May 2018.

Creative Armenia, a global arts foundation for the Armenian people, pursues a 
mandate to discover, develop, produce, and promote innovative talent.  AGBU, a 
trusted name across the diaspora for over a century, has opened many doors for 
talented Armenians through such offerings as university-level performing arts 
scholarships, summer internships, and professional programs such as Musical 
Armenia and Sayat Nova International Composition Competition-all under the aegis 
of the AGBU Performing Arts Department, established in the United States in 2012 
and in Europe in 2016.

For Inquiries:
Anush Ter-Khachatryan / [email protected] Hayk Arsenyan / 
[email protected]

The Armenian General Benevolent Union (AGBU) is the world's largest non-profit 
organization devoted to upholding the Armenian heritage through educational, 
cultural and humanitarian programs. Each year, AGBU is committed to making a 
difference in the lives of 500,000 people across Armenia, Artsakh and the 
Armenian diaspora.  Since 1906, AGBU has remained true to one overarching goal: 
to create a foundation for the prosperity of all Armenians. To learn more visit 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.agbu.org__;!!LIr3w8kk_Xxm!-UpJq6vSz7PUSXeOpr703pkt7wZLhSW_1NC-7GYYfTV4Ui4XLggQfXrWIbLyBA$
 .



AGBU CA Fellowships.jpg


Fellowships 2021 - Press Release (arm).docx

Fellowships 2021 – Press Release (arm).docx


Fellowships 2021 - Press Release (eng).docx

Fellowships 2021 – Press Release (eng).docx

US State Department upgrades travel warning to Turkey due to “terrorism and arbitrary detentions”

Greek City Times


US State Department upgrades travel warning to Turkey due to
“terrorism and arbitrary detentions”

by Paul Antonopoulos

The US State Department upgraded its warning on travel to Turkey on Wednesday.

“Reconsider travel to Turkey due to COVID-19. Exercise increased
caution when traveling to Turkey due to terrorism and arbitrary
detentions. Some areas have increased risk. Read the entire Travel
Advisory,” the State Department warned from their website.

Although Turkey, like most countries, is on a Travel Advisory Level 3
due to COVID-19, there was a special warning for Sirnak and Hakari
provinces.

“Do not travel to: Sirnak province, Hakkari province, and any area
within six miles (ten kilometers) of the Syrian border due to
terrorism. (Level 4),” the State Department warned.

Level 4 is the highest warning and is a “do not travel” demand.

The State Department warns that terrorist attacks can occur anywhere
and with no warning, including the specific targeting of tourist
locations.

“Terrorist groups continue plotting possible attacks in Turkey.
Terrorists may attack with little or no warning, targeting tourist
locations, transportation hubs, markets/shopping malls, local
government facilities, hotels, clubs, restaurants, places of worship,
parks, major sporting and cultural events, educational institutions,
airports, and other public areas,” the State Department warned, adding
that “security forces have detained tens of thousands of individuals,
including U.S. citizens, for alleged affiliations with terrorist
organizations based on scant or secret evidence and grounds that
appear to be politically motivated.”

“U.S. citizens have also been subject to travel bans that prevent them
from departing Turkey. Participation in demonstrations not explicitly
approved by the Government of Turkey, as well as criticism of the
government (including on social media) can result in arrest,” the
statement continued.

The State Department would then give Level 4 Warnings to Sirnak and
Hakkari province, where a strong Kurdish resistance is being made
against the Turkish military.

“Do not travel to Sirnak province, Hakkari province, or any area
within six miles (ten kilometers) of the Turkey/Syria border due to
the continued threat of attacks by terrorist groups, armed conflict,
and civil unrest. Terrorist attacks, including suicide bombings,
ambushes, car bomb detonations, and improvised explosive devices, as
well as shootings, and illegal roadblocks leading to violence have
occurred in these areas. U.S. government employees are restricted from
traveling to these provinces and to any area within six miles (ten
kilometers) of the Turkey/Syria border without prior approval,” the
State Department concluded.


 

Defying Geography: The Israel-Azerbaijan Partnership

Begin-Sadat Center
for Strategic Studies
BESA
by Emil Avdaliani



BESA Center Perspectives Paper No. 1,723, 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Recent fighting between Armenia and Azerbaijan
exposed Israel as a significant player in the region. Though far apart
geographically, Baku and Jerusalem pursue strategic relations. The
dilemma is how this should be done in a region where Russian, Iranian,
and Turkish interests predominate, as none of those countries desires
another competitor.

Fighting in July between Armenia and Azerbaijan caused many casualties
along the border, and the governments of the region fear an escalation
to the scale of the four-day war between the two states in 2016. I
will not delve into the details of the recent flare-up as that has
been done elsewhere (and much remains in dispute in any case), but
will focus instead on one interesting aspect of the tension in the
South Caucasus: the role of Israel.

Jerusalem is confronted with a dilemma in the Armenia-Azerbaijan
conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh (which is officially within
Azerbaijan’s borders). Israel is not a direct participant, but it
enjoys close relations with both combatants (for instance, Armenia
recently sent its first ambassador to Israel). Jerusalem has stayed
completely out of the evolving conflict so far, which is the logical
approach. One of the latest statements from Israel’s foreign ministry
about the recent violence is an anodyne expression of concern and a
hope for a swift ceasefire.

Though small and far from the conflict area, Israel nevertheless has
vital strategic interests in the South Caucasus. Azerbaijan stands
out, as its relations with Israel dwarf the latter’s relations with
Armenia.

Israel and Azerbaijan established diplomatic relations in April 1992,
and in 1993, Israel opened an embassy in Baku. Ever since then,
relations have broadened and deepened. The relationship is predicated
on a number of geo-strategic factors. The first is Azerbaijan’s loss
of political control over Nagorno-Karabakh and growing need to correct
that situation via an expansive military program, which has caused it
to become a major importer of Israeli defense technologies. Israeli
defense companies have trained Azerbaijani special forces and
bodyguards, built security systems for the Baku airport, and upgraded
Soviet-era military equipment (tanks).

The scale of the transactions between the two is immense. In 2012,
reports emerged about a $1.6 billion purchase by Azerbaijan of weapons
manufactured by Israel Aerospace Industries. In 2016, Israeli PM
Benjamin Netanyahu said Azerbaijan had bought $5 billion worth of
weapons from Israel (unmanned aerial vehicles and satellite systems).
In 2017, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute reported
that Baku had purchased $127 million worth of military technology from
Jerusalem.

This does not mean that all has gone smoothly so far. Halts in
cooperation between the two have occurred. In 2017, claims emerged
that an Israeli drone manufacturer had attempted to bomb the Armenian
military on the Azeris’ behalf during a demonstration of one of its
“suicide” unmanned aerial vehicles. In a rare move, the Israeli
Defense Ministry suspended the export license.

Thus it comes as no surprise that on July 21, after the recent border
flare-up with Azerbaijan, Armenia showcased alleged Israeli-made
drones that it presumably shot down during the fighting. No specifics
were given, but the Israeli firm Aeronautics Defense Systems does
indeed manufacture several types of Orbiter UAVs, including
lightweight systems for reconnaissance and others for aerial attack.

Overall, however, the bilateral military cooperation has been
burgeoning ever since Azerbaijan’s independence in 1991. Israel has
been willing to provide Baku with high tech at a level that Yerevan
and even Moscow do not possess.

But business alone is insufficient grounds for a long-term
geopolitical relationship. Azerbaijan and Israel share other
fundamental interests, of which the Iran issue is arguably the most
crucial.

Iran, located to Azerbaijan’s south, is Israel’s arch nemesis, while
Baku and Tehran have mixed relations. Diplomatic relations exist and
bilateral economic contacts are extensive (primarily via the newly
introduced North-South economic corridor through Azerbaijan, though
much more can yet be achieved there). Baku is nevertheless
apprehensive about Iranian moves that could complicate its position in
the South Caucasus and Caspian Sea.

All of this is heightened by Tehran’s concerns about the allegedly
political aspirations of the Azeris in Iran. Tehran thinks that at an
opportune moment, secession talks could occur, at which a “Greater
Azerbaijan” idea might emerge. This is all hypothetical, but there is
a high level of distrust between the two states. Consider, for
example, Azerbaijan’s recent claim that Iran was sending trucks to
Nagorno-Karabakh. Baku summoned Iranian diplomats and accused Tehran
of stoking the conflict over the land.

This state of affairs naturally makes Israel a comfortable partner for
Azerbaijan. Moreover, from Jerusalem’s perspective, Azerbaijan’s
geographic position on Iran’s border makes it an ideal site for the
gathering of strategic intelligence. Media sources claim that Israel
helped Baku build electronic intelligence-gathering stations along the
Azerbaijani border with Iran in the 1990s.

Claims are occasionally made that the two countries are engaged in
tactical cooperation against Iran. For instance, in 2012, Foreign
Policy reported that Israel had an arrangement with Azerbaijan
allowing it to potentially fly sorties out of the country. Cooperation
regarding the war on terror also exists.

The close relations between Israel and Azerbaijan also fit into the
larger perspective the US has for the region. In the early 1990s,
Washington encouraged a triangular relationship between Turkey,
Azerbaijan, and Israel. Georgia was added later, though the Russian
invasion of Georgia in 2008 shattered Tbilisi’s prospects as did the
crisis in Israeli-Turkish relations.

Despite that setback, the geopolitical model has worked. Azerbaijan
and Israel continue to regard their geopolitical interests as vital
for regional security, and Georgia plays a transit role. Baku supplies
up to 40% of Israel’s oil needs, which is imported through the
Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) pipeline.

There are also weaknesses to their bilateral relations. Azerbaijan
experiences geopolitical pressure from Russia and Iran, and the
cold-to-hot war with Armenia is a persistent problem. In these
difficult geopolitical circumstances, Baku has to balance its
relations with Israel carefully to avoid drawing heavy pressure from
Tehran, Moscow, and even Ankara.


Emil Avdaliani teaches history and international relations at Tbilisi
State University and Ilia State University. He has worked for various
international consulting companies and currently publishes articles on
military and political developments across the former Soviet space.


 

Fight and die for Turkey? Members of Erdoğan’s AKP avoided compulsory military service with fake papers

Greek City Times

Fight and die for Turkey? Members of Erdoğan’s AKP avoided compulsory
military service with fake papers

by Paul Antonopoulos



There is little doubt that Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development
Party (AKP) are increasing war rhetoric against Greece.

Metin Külünk, an ideologue of Erdoğan’s and Member of Parliament for
the AKP that was in the same youth movement as Erdoğan, went to
Twitter to call for a Greater Turkey. Külünk called for a Greater
Turkey that includes large areas of northern Greece and the east
Aegean islands, half of Bulgaria, Cyprus and Armenia in its entirety,
and large areas of Georgia, Iraq and Syria, as previously reported by
Greek City Times.

In fact, only yesterday, Turkish Vice President Fuat Oktay, commented
on the “12 nautical miles” and said “If this is not a reason for war,
then what is?” and that Turks “cry out” to occupy Greek islands.

At one AKP rally, members shouted at Erdoğan to “go to Afrin,” to
which he replied: “If necessary, we will all go together. First me and
then you with me.”

What followed was an invasion of Afrin in Syria’s north, which
expelled the Kurdish People’s Protection Units (YPG) who are the
Syrian branch of the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK).

We’ve seen Turkey intervene in Syria, taking advantage of a country
that has been devastated for over nine years by Turkish-backed
jihadists. Turkey also military intervene in Libya that been gripped
by war since 2011, just as Syria has.

However, a war with Greece is entirely different scenario. Not only
has the Greek Navy never lost a battle since its modern formation in
1821, and not only have Greek pilots won NATO’s “Best Warrior” award
in consecutive years, but Greeks are more united then over.

It is for this reason that Turks are less willing to go to war
compared to Greeks despite their own country creating the hostilities.

So the question becomes of course, who in Turkey would be willing to
fight the Greeks. Of course, although it is the AKP, with support from
other factions in Turkey including the so-called “progressive”
Kemalists, that are drumming the beats of war, it appears that even
they are not so enthusiastic for war.

This would explain why they are stirring an ultra-nationalistic
rhetoric to prepare the population for war, while protecting their
own, expecting others to die for their delusions of occupying Greek
islands.

Dozens of AKP members, according to Liberal Demokrat Yazarlar, have
presented false certificates, in order to avoid military service.

Some names:

Ahmet Burak Erdoğan, son of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.

Necmettin Bilal Erdoğan, son of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.

Ahmet Moutzachit Arınç, son of Bülent Arınç – AKP founder.

Suleyman VOURAL, nephew of Binali Yıldırım AKP founder.

Enes Çelik, son of Labor Minister Faruk Çelik.

Yusuf Şamlı, nephew of Environment Minister İdris Güllüce.

Osman Çavuşoğlu, nephew of Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu.

Ahmet Bahadır Çağlayan, nephew of former Minister Zafer Çağlayan.

Mahmut Hakan Güler, nephew of former Minister Muammer Güler.

Nedim Eker, nephew of Agriculture Minister Mehmet Mehdi Eker.

Kerim Canikli, nephew of former National Defense Minister Nurettin Canikli.

Yasin Canikli, nephew of former National Defense Minister Nurettin Canikli.

Ibrahim Can Yılmaz, nephew of former Defense Minister İsmet Yılmaz.

Tariq Eren Yılmaz, nephew of former Defense Minister İsmet Yılmaz.



 

RFE/RL Armenian Report – 08/31/2020

                                        Monday, 

Serzh Sarkisian’s Former Bodyguard Again Under Investigation

        • Gayane Saribekian

Armenia - President Serzh Sarkisian (R) and his chief bodyguard Vachagan 
Ghazarian (L), Yerevan, April 14, 2012.

Law-enforcement authorities confirmed on Monday that they have launched a fresh 
criminal investigation into the former chief bodyguard of ex-President Serzh 
Sarkisian almost one year after he transferred 2.9 billion drams ($6 million) to 
the state.

A spokeswoman for the Special Investigative Service (SIS) told RFE/RL’s Armenian 
service that Vachagan Ghazarian is suspected of having misused large amounts of 
public funds in his past capacity as deputy chief of a security agency providing 
bodyguards to Armenia’s leaders. She did not give any other details, saying only 
that Ghazarian has not been formally charged with any crime so far.

In a report not refuted by the authorities, 1in.am said Ghazarian could be 
prosecuted for illegally ordering an employee of the State Protection Service 
(SPS) to work as a driver for his wife and forcing six other SPS officers to 
work as security guards at a Yerevan music club owned by him and his wife.

The officers allegedly guarded the club at taxpayers’ expense from 2013-2017. 
They have already been interrogated by investigators, according to the media 
outlet.


Armenia - Vachagan Ghazarian empties his bag filled with cash after being 
arrested by the National Security Service in Yerevan, 25 June 2018.

Ghazarian headed Sarkisian’s security detail for over two decades. He was 
arrested in June 2018 on charges of “illegal enrichment” and false asset 
disclosure shortly after the “Velvet Revolution” that toppled Armenia’s former 
leader. He was subsequently also charged with tax evasion.

A Yerevan court freed Ghazarian on bail a few months later, after he and his 
wife, Ruzanna Beglarian, agreed to “compensate” the state for taxes evaded by 
them. The SIS announced in October 2019 that the couple has completed the $6 
million payment. In return, the law-enforcement agency dropped the criminal 
charges.

Officers of Armenia’s police and National Security Service (NSS) found $1.1 
million and 230,000 euros in cash when they raided Ghazarian’s Yerevan apartment 
in June 2018. The NSS said he carried a further $120,000 and 436 million drams 
($900,000) in a bag when he was caught outside a commercial bank in Yerevan a 
few days later.

In early 2019, the NSS secured an even heftier payout, worth $30 million, from 
Serzh Sarkisian’s indicted brother Aleksandr. The money was held in Aleksandr 
Sarkisian’s Armenian bank account frozen by the security service following the 
2018 revolution.



Putin Again Congratulates Kocharian


Russia – Russian President Vladimir Putin (L) and Armenian President Robert 
Kocharian meet in Sochi, August 20, 2004

Russian President Vladimir Putin telephoned Robert Kocharian on Monday to 
congratulate his indicted former Armenian counterpart on his 66th birthday 
anniversary.
Putin also sent Kocharian a separate congratulatory message on the occasion.

“People in Russia know you as a remarkable statesman who has done a great deal 
for the development of modern Armenia,” read the telegram publicized by the 
Kremlin. “We highly value your personal contribution to strengthening the 
friendship and alliance between our countries.”

Putin has made a pointing of congratulating Kocharian since the latter was first 
arrested in July 2018 on charges stemming from the 2008 post-election violence 
in Yerevan. He was also subsequently charged with bribery. The Russian Foreign 
Ministry criticized the arrest as politically motivated.

Kocharian, who strongly denies all charges leveled against him, was released 
from custody in August 2018, only to be arrested again three months later.

The ex-president, who ruled Armenia from 1998-2008, was again set free days 
after going on trial in May 2019. He was arrested for a third time nearly two 
months later.

The Russian ambassador to Armenia, Sergei Kopyrkin, was criticized by Prime 
Minister Nikol Pashinian’s political allies and summoned to the Armenian Foreign 
Ministry after meeting with Kocharian shortly before his third arrest. Putin 
continued to signal support for Kocharian even after that. He met with 
Kocharian’s wife Bella during an October 2019 visit to Yerevan.

Kocharian, who is very critical of Pashinian’s administration, was freed again 
in June this year after paying a record $4.1 million bail set by Armenia’s Court 
of Appeals. The bulk of the hefty sum was reportedly provided by four wealthy 
Russian businessmen.

Armenian officials maintain that Moscow’s gestures of support for Kocharian have 
not damaged Armenia’s close political, economic and military ties with Russia. 
The ex-president’s loyalists claim the opposite.



Mayor Accused Of Broken Promises Over Yerevan’s Transport Woes

        • Artak Khulian

Armenia - An overcrowded public transport minibus in Yerevan, October 16, 2018.

An opposition member of Yerevan’s municipal council on Monday accused Mayor Hayk 
Marutian of failing to deliver on his promises to completely revamp and 
modernize the city’s collapsing system of public transport.

Ever since the mid-1990s, the system has been dominated by minibuses belonging 
to private companies. Few of them have invested in their fleet of aging vehicles 
in the past decade. The minibuses as well as a smaller number of buses provided 
by the municipal authorities have become even more overcrowded as a result.

A British transport consultancy, WYG, was contracted by Yerevan’s former 
municipal administration in 2016 to propose a detailed plan to change the 
transport network. Then Mayor Taron Markarian essentially accepted the proposals 
in 2017, pledging to replace the battered minibuses with new and larger buses by 
the end of 2018.

Markarian was forced to resign in July 2018 two months after the “Velvet 
Revolution” that brought down Armenia’s former government. Marutian, his 
successor allied to Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian, pledged to address the 
problem after taking office in October 2018.

Marutian’s office asked Pashinian’s government last year to raise more than $100 
million to buy 820 modern buses which it said would end the Armenian capital’s 
transport woes. In a related development, it called in April this year an 
international tender for the purchase of 100 new and large buses. The tender was 
not completed for still unclear reasons.

The municipal administration announced in July it will buy instead 100 small 
buses and hold another tender for that purpose. The international tender was 
formally launched on Monday.

Davit Khazhakian, an opposition member of the city council, claimed that 
municipality is planning to buy more minibuses, rather than regular size buses 
repeatedly promised by Marutian. He said the bidding specifications are such 
that the tender will inevitably be won by the Russian company GAZ whose GAZelle 
minibuses form the backbone of Yerevan’s public transport network.

“The authorities have told the public for the last couple of years that they 
will buy new buses and create a new network,” Khazhakian told a news conference. 
“But they are going to commission more GAZelles.”

Deputy Mayor Hrachya Sargsian did not deny that the municipality wants to 
continue to at least partly rely on minibuses. He insisted, however, that the 
outcome of the tender is not a forgone conclusion and that Western carmakers 
could also win it.

Sargsian also told RFE/RL’s Armenian service that the municipality has not 
abandoned its plans to purchases hundreds of new buses. But he could not say 
when the Armenian capital will have a new and modern transport system.

Marutian said last year that nearly half of some 900 minibuses catering to 
commuters in Yerevan are too old and must be decommissioned.



Armenia In Talks With Russia Over Another Fighter Jet Deal

        • Harry Tamrazian

Armenia -- Su-30SM fighter jets of the Armenian Air Force fly over Yerevan, May 
5, 2020.

Armenia is holding talks with Russia to buy more Sukhoi Su-30SM fighter jets for 
its armed forces, Defense Minister Davit Tonoyan said over the weekend.
“The acquisition of a new batch [of Su-30SM jets] is planned,” he told RFE/RL’s 
Armenian service. “Negotiations are underway at the moment.”

Tonoyan, who most recently visited Moscow last week, gave no details of the 
negotiations.

In a significant boost to its small Air Force, Armenia has already purchased 
four such multirole jets at an undisclosed price. They were delivered to an 
airbase in Gyumri in December. Tonoyan said earlier in 2019 that Yerevan plans 
to acquire eight more Su-30SMs in the coming years.

Su-30SM is a modernized version of a heavy fighter jet developed by Russia’s 
Sukhoi company in the late 1980s. The Russian military first commissioned it in 
2012.

Before receiving the first four Su-30SMs the Armenian Air Force largely 
consisted of 15 or so Su-25 aircraft designed for close air support and ground 
attack missions. The Armenian Defense Ministry contracted on August 24 a Russian 
defense company, United Aircraft Corporation (UAC), to modernize some of these 
aging jets.

Tonoyan revealed on Saturday that UAC will repair and upgrade four of them in 
Russia. He stressed the importance of that deal, saying that the Armenian 
military had sought it “for years.”

The deal was signed in Moscow in Tonoyan’s presence. While in the Russian 
capital, the latter also attended the opening ceremony of the International Army 
Games and met with Russia’s Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu.

Tonoyan praised the current state of Russian-Armenian military cooperation and, 
in particular, defense contracts signed by Moscow and Yerevan in the last 
several years.

He also said: “In the area of defense industry there have been quite interesting 
developments. I don’t want to go into details now, but I am buoyed by the 
involvement of private companies in the creation of [Russian-Armenian] joint 
ventures in Armenia.”

One such development is the production of advanced models of Kalashnikov assault 
rifles which was launched by the Armenian company Neitron in July. Russia’s 
Kalashnikov Concern has granted Neitron a 10-year license to assemble up to 
50,000 AK-103 rifles annually.

Russia has long been the principal source of military hardware supplied to the 
Armenian army. Membership in Russian-led Collective Security Treaty Organization 
(CSTO) allows Armenia to acquire Russian weapons at knockdown prices and even 
for free.


Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2020 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.

 


The California Courier Online, September 3, 2020

1 -        Arab World Finally Exposes Erdogan’s

            Hypocrisy as ‘Defender’ of Palestinians

            By Harut Sassounian

            Publisher, The California Courier

            www.TheCaliforniaCourier.com

2-         Almost $1.4 Million Raised during HyeAid Lebanon Telethon

3 -        Armenian Government Moves to Lift Coronavirus State of Emergency

4-         Commentary: Ensuring Education Equity in Armenia

5-         Rep. Ilhan Omar joins Congressional Armenian Caucus

*****************************************

******************************************

1 -        Arab World Finally Exposes Erdogan’s

            Hypocrisy as ‘Defender’ of Palestinians

            By Harut Sassounian

            Publisher, The California Courier

            www.TheCaliforniaCourier.com

I have written in the past pointing out Turkish President Recep Tayyip
Erdogan’s hypocrisy on proclaiming himself as the ‘defender’ of
Palestinians, while maintaining a military, diplomatic and economic
alliance with Israel.

Khaled Abu Toameh, an award-winning journalist based in Jerusalem who
is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at Gatestone Institute, published a
lengthy article on August 25, 2020 on Gatestone Institute’s website,
titled: “Arabs and Muslims to Turkey’s Erdogan: ‘Why Don’t You Protest
Against Yourself?’”

Erdogan inherited from Ottoman Sultans the skill of walking a
diplomatic tightrope. For centuries, the Ottoman Empire perfected the
political art of seeming to be on both sides of conflicting powers.
The Sultans sided with France and England against Germany and with
Germany against France and England. The same policy is being pursued
now by Erdogan, appearing to be on the Palestinian side, while
maintaining multi-faceted relations with Israel. Similarly, Turkey is
a NATO member, while purchasing advanced missiles from Russia which
violates NATO policies. Amazingly, Erdogan is simultaneously the good
friend of both Trump and Putin!

This contradictory and dishonest Turkish behavior finally was exposed
in the Arab and Islamic world on the occasion of Israel and United
Arab Emirates (UAE) normalizing their relations. Erdogan threatened
UAE on August 14, 2020, to cut off diplomatic relations and recall
Turkey’s Ambassador from the UAE, while Turkey itself maintains normal
relations with Israel, where it has an Embassy, and Israel has an
Embassy in Ankara!

Many Arabs are now reminding Erdogan that “Turkey was the first
Muslim-majority country to recognize the State of Israel. They also
remind him of his official visit to Israel in 2005 and the decades of
military, strategic and diplomatic cooperation between Turkey and
Israel,” Abu Toameh wrote.

Here are several statements that Abu Toameh quoted from Arab and
Muslim sources exposing Erdogan’s hypocritical position.

Erdogan is “the official sponsor of terrorist groups in the region. He
uses these groups to destabilize the Arab countries, including Syria,
Iraq, Libya, and Egypt…. It seems that Erdogan is suffering from
schizophrenia that surprises and confuses even his supporters,” wrote
Egyptian journalist Adel al-Sanhoury, in youm7.com, on August 21,
2020.

Jordanian writer Noura al-Moteari asked: “Does Erdogan have a mental
illness and a dual personality, or does he know for sure that his
followers from the oppressed Turkish people and the Muslim Brotherhood
follow him with blind loyalty and do not see beyond the end of their
noses? How does Erdogan threaten to withdraw his ambassador from Abu
Dhabi because of the historic peace agreement with Israel, while the
Israeli embassy in Turkey is active?”

Saudi political activist Munther al-Sheikh Mubarak wrote: “I am sure
Erdogan needs a psychiatrist. It has been reported that Turkey will
serve Israel by transporting Israelis to the UAE at a time when
Erdogan is objecting to normalization [with Israel]. There is no cure
for stupidity.”

Saudi political activist Abdullah al-Bander said in a video he posted
on social media that Erdogan is known for his words more than his
actions. “What’s funny is that Erdogan was also the first Muslim
leader to visit the grave of [Zionism founder Theodor] Herzl in Israel
and meet with [then Israeli Prime Minister Ariel] Sharon. Erdogan is
trading in the Palestinian cause. Turkey has had relations with Israel
for more than 70 years, but it has done nothing good for the
Palestinians all these years.”

Saudi writer Rawaf al-Soain also posted a video on social media
platforms in which he asked: “Why don’t you [Erdogan] withdraw your
ambassador from Tel Aviv and expel the Israeli ambassador in Turkey so
that we can call you a hero and supporter of the Palestinian cause? By
accusing the United Arab Emirates, Erdogan is being silly and
despicable.”

The Saudi newspaper Okaz wrote in an editorial: “Erdogan’s regime does
not miss an opportunity to trade in the Palestinian issue and deceive
everyone. Despite Erdogan’s hypocrisy, which has become exposed to
Arab and Islamic public opinion, his regime continues to play on the
feelings of Muslims. The Turkish president appears to be applying
double standards by ignoring the presence of his ambassador in Tel
Aviv.”

Abu Toameh concluded: “The strong reactions of many Arabs to Erdogan’s
threat is a sign that they understand that he is a conniving
opportunist playing the Arab and Muslim card in an attempt to revive
an Islamic caliphate under his rule. Judging from the broader Arab
response to Erdogan’s threat, the Turkish leader, rather than being
perceived as any kind of Caliph, is perceived as a demented demagogue
and a sponsor of terrorism.”

In addition, Turkish journalist Burak Bekdil provided the historical
background of Turkey’s double-faced approach to diplomacy in an
article published by the BESA Center on August 27, 2020.

Bekdil wrote: “Turkey remained neutral during the Arab-Israeli war of
1948. At its conclusion, the then young Turkish republic became the
first Muslim country to recognize the infant state of Israel on March
28, 1949. In January 1950, Ankara sent a career diplomat, Seyfullah
Esin, to Tel Aviv as the first Turkish chargé d’affaires in Israel. In
1951, Turkey joined the Western bloc of countries that protested
Cairo’s decision to deny Israeli ships passage through the Suez Canal.
The Mossad [Israel’s Intelligence Agency] opened a station on Turkish
soil in the early 1950s. In 1954, Turkish PM Adnan Menderes, while on
a visit to the US, called on Arab states to recognize Israel.”

Probably worse than Turkish hypocrisy is the gullibility of Western
and Arab nations that have been fooled by Turkish deceits to think
that Turkey is their friend and ally.

************************************************************************************************************************************************

2-         Almost $1.4 Million Raised during HyeAid Lebanon Telethon

The HyeAid Lebanon Telethon raised $1,375,555 on Sunday, August 30 to
provide much-needed and immediate assistance to the Armenian community
of Lebanon, which has been reeling since a massive explosion at the
Beirut port on August 4 that devastated the city and rippled through
the entire country.

Soon after the explosion, the Pan-Armenian Council of Western United
States launched HyeAid Lebanon, a community-wide fundraising effort
with the participation of all Armenian religious denominations and the
leading community organizations. The ongoing fundraising effort, which
began almost immediately after the tragedy, got a boost during a
three-and-a-half hour telethon, broadcast on ARTN, USArmenia and
Horizon Armenian television channels and was live-streamed on the
Asbarez, Horizon and HyeAid Facebook pages.

To date, about $6 million in aid has been provided to
Lebanese-Armenian families affected by the August 4 bombing in Beirut.

Significant contributions have been made by: Armenian Relief Society
Central Executive ($600,000); Pan Armenian Council of Western USA
($1,375,000); Armenian General Benevolent Union ($2,000,000);
Benefactor Alecco Bezikian ($1,000,000); Businessman Samvel Karapetyan
($320,000); Hayastan All-Armenian Fund ($285,000); Tsarukyan
Charitable Foundation ($200,000); The Republic of Artsakh ($50,000);
Patriotic Union of Anjar ($150,000).

In addition to financial assistance, three flights were carried out
from Armenia to Lebanon, transporting humanitarian aid.

************************************************************************************************************************************************

3 -        Armenian Government Moves to Lift Coronavirus State of Emergency

The Armenian government signaled on Thursday, August 27, plans to lift
a state of emergency which it declared more than five months ago to
fight against the coronavirus pandemic.

The government approved a bill that would allow it to keep in place
safety and hygiene rules and even impose, if necessary, nationwide or
local lockdowns without again extending the state of emergency, which
is due to expire on September 11.

Under the bill involving amendments to several Armenian laws,
authorities will also be able to seal off local communities hit by
serious coronavirus outbreaks, quarantine infected people and continue
requiring all citizens to wear masks in public spaces.

Speaking at a cabinet meeting in Yerevan, Justice Minister Rustam
Badasian confirmed that the government will not again extend the state
of emergency if the bill is passed by the Armenian parliament by
September 11.

Badasian insisted that the new legal regime will involve fewer
restrictions on people’s freedom of movements and civil rights.

In particular, he said, the authorities will stop accessing personal
data from mobile phones to identify individuals who have had physical
contact with COVID-19 patients and completely banning any type of
business activity.

The government already lifted earlier this month a coronavirus-related
ban on rallies strongly criticized by the Armenian opposition.

But it set strict physical distancing requirements for organizers and
participants of public gatherings.

The government approved the bill even though Prime Minister Nikol
Pashinyan strongly criticized its authors, the Armenian ministries of
justice and health, for not consulting with the Ministry of Defense
beforehand. He also deplored the fact that the bill was sent to the
office of the state human rights ombudsman only two days before the
latest cabinet meeting.

As of Monday, August 24, Armenia has recorded a total of 43,781
COVID-19 cases. A total of 37,722 of these patients have since
recovered while 5,180 remain active.

The death toll as a direct result of complications from COVID-19 stands at 879.

The daily number of new confirmed cases has shrunk by more than half
since mid-July despite the virtual absence of lockdown restrictions.

Citing the downward trend, the government decided recently to reopen
all schools and universities in September. The Ministry of Education
went on to put in place detailed safety protocols for all educational
institutions.

**********************************************************************************************************************************************

4-         Commentary: Ensuring Education Equity in Armenia

DASARAN Educational Program’s CEO Suren Aloyan has lately been
outspoken about his organization’s role in Armenia’s education
modernization, while blaming the Ministry of Education, Science,
Culture and Sport (henceforth “the Ministry”) for allegedly
obstructing DASARAN’s operations.

In The California Courier’s August 20, 2020 issue, Mr. Aloyan’s
article stated that DASARAN allowed for the country’s 350,000+
students’ distance learning.

The uninterrupted education for Armenia’s students amidst a global
pandemic was first and foremost due to the exceptional sense of
dedication and responsibility of the teachers as well as the state
policy pursued by the Ministry. With due respect and appreciation for
all the online educational resources and solutions offered by the
public, private and international sectors—including DASARAN—Armenia’s
success cannot be attributed to any particular organization.

As for Mr. Aloyan’s accusation that “Armenia’s Education Minister is
threatening to dismantle DASARAN – to build their own platform from
bottom-up,” the reality is that the Ministry does prioritize
developing distance learning capabilities, especially while facing a
pandemic and state of emergency.

To that end, the Ministry has developed a comprehensive action plan,
tasking its departments and subsidiaries, such as the National Center
of Educational Technologies (NCET) with its implementation.

The state has a responsibility to uphold the right to education as
well as the principle of continuity of education. As such, the
government should operationalize at least one unified online platform
to safeguard equity in education for everyone. The Ministry, of
course, welcomes other stakeholders’ contributions towards this
mission. Inclusion of many such platforms in the Ministry’s online
portal (heravar.arm.edu.am) in the spring 2020 semester is but one
proof of this.

The Ministry administers statistical studies and maintains registers
prescribed by appropriate legislation with the vision of a unified
information management system in the country across all education
levels. The Ministry has introduced the unified Education Management
Information System (emis.am), with an electronic register developed by
NCET available to educational institutions to centralize data entry
for accurate statistics and to allow for a more efficient distance
learning.

Schools are required by state to maintain certain electronic registers
and personal files. To this end, the Ministry undertakes its duties in
accordance to law, not just a mere service. This is critical for
personal data protection, cybersecurity and system compatibility too.

There are no statutory requirements for the Ministry to employ
DASARAN’s platform and Mr. Aloyan’s accusation that the Ministry is
trying to drive any company out of business is baseless and illogical.
DASARAN has never had mandate to maintain or service educational
registers, and Ministry’s “own platform” does not trample on anyone’s
rights.

The Ministry has always supported worthwhile educational projects as
evidenced by the dozens of successful public-private partnerships in
this realm. Stated simply, state policy cannot derive from any private
entity’s interests.

Additionally, DASARAN’s 2017-2018 state funding has raised reasonable
doubts regarding the funds’ effective use and transparency. Evidence
has already been shared with the appropriate law enforcement agencies,
who are now investigating this as a criminal case.

Ministry of Education, Science, Culture and Sports of the Republic of Armenia

************************************************************************************************************************************************

5-         Rep. Ilhan Omar joins Congressional Armenian Caucus

(Public Radio of Armenia)—Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) has joined the
Congressional Caucus on Armenian Issues, the Armenian Assembly of
America reports.

Since her “present” vote on the Armenian Genocide resolution
(H.Res.296), which passed in an overwhelming and bipartisan manner on
October 29, 2019, Rep. Omar has dedicated serious time and attention
engaging with her Armenian American constituents in Minnesota’s 5th
congressional district.

Rep. Omar thus joins fellow members of the Minnesota congressional
delegation Reps. Betty McCollum and Collin Peterson, as members of the
Armenian Caucus.

Last October Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar was widely criticized for
abstaining on Armenian Genocide Resolution.

She was one of just two Democrats to vote ‘present’ on a resolution
recognizing the Armenian genocide at the hands of the Ottoman Turks a
century ago.

After casting her vote, Omar said in a statement: “I also believe
accountability for human rights violations—especially ethnic cleansing
and genocide—is paramount. But accountability and recognition of
genocide should not be used as cudgel in a political fight.”

***********************************************************************************************************************************************

**********************************************************************************************************************************************

California Courier Online provides viewers of the Armenian News News Service
with a few of the articles in this week's issue of The California
Courier.  Letters to the editor are encouraged through our e-mail
address, . However, authors are
requested to provide their names, addresses, and/or telephone numbers
to verify identity, if any question arises. California Courier
subscribers are requested not to use this service to change, or modify
mailing addresses. Those changes can be made through our e-mail,
, or by phone, (818) 409-0949.