ANKARA: Armenia Surrenders To Russia On The Issue Of The Customs Uni

ARMENIA SURRENDERS TO RUSSIA ON THE ISSUE OF THE CUSTOMS UNION

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
Sept 10 2013

by Mehmet Fatih OZTARSU*

Armenia, no longer able to withstand the pressures applied by Russia,
has finally agreed to enter the Customs Union. Armenian President
Serzh Sarksyan, during a Sept. 2 visit to discuss Russian-Armenian
relations in Moscow, made a surprise announcement that Armenia would
be entering into the Customs Union formed by a Russian initiative.

The fact that the announcement came at an important stage of ongoing
EU-Armenian dialogue caused a shockwave in Europe.

Sarksyan, who had given no information to the public prior to his
statement and who managed to show first and foremost that Armenia
would not be straying from the Moscow axis, stressed in his speech
how Russia was an important guarantor of the safety for Armenia. In
the meantime, opposition parties in Armenia have now begun to assert
that the country’s foreign policy has collapsed, and that the national
sovereignty of the leadership mechanism has been inextricably tied
to that of Russia.

A statement from the Armenian socialist Dashnak Party asserted that
while there was some level of reason in this move, not to have shared
this information with the public was a great mistake. At the same
time, the Dashnak Party noted that the decision would have a direct
effect on the security of both Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh, and that
dialogue with the EU during the coming period must absolutely not
be cut off. The liberal opposition Heritage Party in the meantime
made a statement asserting that Armenian relations with the EU had
been forced to an end, and that a stance against European values was
pulling the country as a whole to the edge of a chasm.

One party supporting Sarksyan’s newly announced decision is the
Prosperous Armenia Party, which made a statement noting that
Armenia needed Russia for security, and adding that Armenia
was Russia’s biggest trading partner. As for the Free Democrats
Movement, it announced that in making his decision, Sarksyan had
in fact violated the first article of the Armenian constitution,
and was thus discounting national sovereignty. Raffi Hovhannisyan,
the founder of the Heritage Party and someone who clashed with the
leading party all through 2013, has now called on the Armenian people,
including those in the diaspora, to come up with an urgent solution,
insisting that Sarksyan resign immediately.

‘Armenia should not expect to be able to balance policies between
both Europe and Russia at the same time’

In an attempt to quell negative reactions, Sarksyan did announce
that in becoming a member of the Customs Union, Armenia would not be
breaking off relations with the EU. The current situation does appear
to put the Partnership Agreement — expected after much effort on both
sides to finally be signed in November in Vilnius — at risk. And in
the meantime, statements coming out of Europe have underscored that
Armenia should not expect to be able to balance policies between
both Europe and Russia at the same time. Similar warnings have been
issued in the past. One such example is when officials from the
European Parliament’s Foreign Relations Committee warned Armenia
in relation to the Russian-backed Customs Union, noting that the
European Parliament would not be able to make partnership decisions
with members of this union.

While this has all been unfolding, various media groups based in
Yerevan have backed the idea that ongoing talks with the EU are in
fact not essential for Armenia, and that instead, the Customs Union,
with its promises of security and economic gain, is a wiser decision
for Armenia. As for factions insisting that Armenia has now missed its
opportunity to sign a Free Trade Agreement with the EU, they are busy
debating just what sort of advantages the Customs Union will bring
to Armenia, which has no shared border with Russia. As Armenia does
not have strong relations with other Customs Union members Belarus
or Kazakhstan, many have already queried what sort of gain Armenia
will make from joining the union. Some have also pointed out that any
offer of security for the Nagorno-Karabakh region is a topic which has
nothing to do with the Customs Union anyway. In the end though, the
most essential problem herein is the undependable and unclear foreign
policies being followed by a Yerevan which has just betrayed Europe.

Some are now opining that Armenia’s seemingly sudden desire to enter
into the Russian-backed Customs Union is in fact one path Yerevan sees
for escaping from long-standing pressures placed on it by Russia. The
crises and large protests experienced in recent months over energy
appear to have forced the Yerevan leadership towards a rapid decision.

Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan, who announced in May that the real
reason for the energy crisis was the question of the Customs Union,
noted at the time that as long as Armenia was not a member, the crises
would only get more serious. Government officials are also insisting
that the people of Armenia ought not have worries on the topic of
membership in the Customs Union, noting that under current laws,
it isn’t possible for Armenia to join yet anyway.

And so the seemingly sudden decision to join the Customs Union
is being linked to the question of the country’s security, with
frightening scenarios being drawn out in front of the people of
the country. Depending on Russia for security matters, as with
so many other issues, the military-rooted leaders of Armenia’s
Nagorno-Karabakh region have in fact caused the collapse of the
country’s foreign policies. In the coming period, the leadership
of Armenia may well confront serious resistance from opposition to
its path, with the struggles of the Karabakh and Armenian peoples
causing great turbulence. The Armenian people, weary of the push and
pull between Europe and Russia, may well propel opposition leaders
to the front when it comes to the topic of the hindrance of national
independence, and of Yerevan being pulled into a Russian sand trap.

*Mehmet Fatih OZTARSU is an analyst with the Strategic Outlook
Institution.

http://www.todayszaman.com/news-325997-armenia-surrenders-to-russia-on-the-issue-of-the-customs-union-by-mehmet-fatih-oztarsu-.html

ANKARA: Lawyer Claims MİT Gave Order To Kill Dink In Cyrillic

LAWYER CLAIMS MIT GAVE ORDER TO KILL DINK IN CYRILLIC

, Turkey
Sept 10 2013

Fethiye Cetin claimed in her newly published book that the order to
kill Dink was given by the National Intelligence Organization (MÝT)
via an encrypted message written in Cyrillic

Fethiye Cetin, one of the lawyers of the family of murdered
Turkish-Armenian journalist Hrant Dink, claimed in her newly published
book that the order to kill Dink was given by the National Intelligence
Organization (MÝT) via an encrypted message written in Cyrillic,
the Milliyet daily reported on Monday. Cetin based her claims on
explanations and documents from Ramazan Dundar, a cryptology expert
at MÝT.

The late editor-in-chief of the Turkish-Armenian weekly Agos, Dink was
shot dead in broad daylight on Jan. 19, 2007, by an ultranationalist
teenager outside the offices of his newspaper in Ýstanbul. The gunman,
Ogun Samast, and 18 others were brought to trial. The investigation
into his murder was stalled but the suspected perpetrator and his
accomplices were put on trial. However, the final ruling issued by
the Ýstanbul 14th High Criminal Court last year failed to appease
those expecting justice to be served.

In her book, titled “Utanc Duyuyorum-Hrant Dink Cinayeti’nin Yargýsý”
(I am ashamed — Trial of Hrant Dink’s Murder), Cetin says she
received a phone call on March 16, 2010, from a man who called
himself “Ramazan” and said he works as a cryptology expert at MÝT’s
East Anatolia regional office. He said he had an important document
regarding Dink’s murder and would give the document to Cetin if she
went to the French Consulate in Aleppo to collect it.

Cetin said her friend in Gaziantep agreed to go to Aleppo on her behalf
to collect the document. In the meantime, she said she continued
to communicate with Ramazan over Skype and the man showed her some
encrypted documents about Dink’s murder.

“I did not understand anything. I asked the man what those documents
had to do with Dink’s murder,” Cetin said.

In response, Ramazan said: “The documents that I have are encrypted.

In correspondence, no state office says, ‘Go and kill Dink’.”

Cetin said the encrypted messages were deciphered with the help of
Dundar to reveal the execution order given by MÝT for Dink.

In her book, Cetin also included MÝT’s response to her allegation. She
said she went to the prosecutor’s office and asked several questions
that were directed at MÝT. In response, MÝT denied the allegations
of giving an execution order for Dink, saying that MÝT does not have
an employee named Ramazan Dundar and that the document provided by
Dundar does not belong to MÝT.

Cihan

http://www.worldbulletin.net/?aType=haber&ArticleID=117419
www.WorldBulletin.net

ANKARA: A Religious Ceremony Held At Armenian Church

A RELIGIOUS CEREMONY HELD AT ARMENIAN CHURCH

, Turkey
Sept 10 2013

A “Church Name” ceremony was held at the Surp Giragos Armenian Church
in Turkey’s southeast Diyarbakir province

World Bulletin / News Desk

A religious ceremony was held on Tuesday at the historical Surp
Giragos Armenian Church in Turkey’s southeastern city of Diyarbakir.

The religious ceremony, which is annually held in the name of all
Armenian churches, was held under the title of “Church Name” at the
Surp Giragos Armenian Church which was constructed in 1377.

The church was renovated through the joint efforts of the Foundation
for the Surp Giragos Armenian Church and Diyarbakir Metropolitan
Municipality.

Along with Armenian residents of Turkey, high-level officials from the
Turkish Armenian Patriarchate, Diyarbakir Metropolitan Mayor Osman
Baydemir, US Consul General in Adana James Michael Saxton Ruiz also
attended the ceremony led by Istanbul Armenian Patriarchate official
on inter-religions affairs Sahak Mashalyan.

Officials attending the ceremony prayed and extended wishes of hope
and peace for the entire region and its ethnic and religious diversity.

http://www.worldbulletin.net/?aType=haber&ArticleID=117432
www.WorldBulletin.net

ANKARA: Genocide: Conversation Stopper And The Events Of 1915

GENOCIDE: CONVERSATION STOPPER AND THE EVENTS OF 1915

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
Sept 10 2013

by Matt Haydon*
10 September 2013 /

There is a “war of words” going on within the Armenian academic
community in the pages of Armenian Weekly about those who participated
in a recent conference titled “The Caucasus at Imperial Twilight:
Nationalism, Ethnicity and Nation-Building, 1870s-1920s” (Tbilisi,
Georgia, June 5-9).

A group of professors are accusing the Armenian scholars who
participated in the conference to discuss the Caucasus and the events
of 1915 either as denialists or being co-opted.

As a member of the Armenian community and a participant in the Tbilisi
conference, I was disturbed to learn that I was also labeled a genocide
denier. While I am an Armenian whose family also escaped the horrors
of what happened in the Ottoman Empire, I am also a student who is
interested in finding out how the events of 1915 took place, what
exactly happened and why it happened. This is the point of attending an
academic conference: to explore new ideas and concepts and to interact
with scholars who are working on the issues. More importantly, it is
to identify areas in research that are lacking and need exploration.

What was the purpose of the Tbilisi Conference? Was the goal of the
conference to push the agenda of genocide denial? Absolutely not.

First of all, the conference, as apparent in its title, covered the
imperial rivalries in the 19th and early 20th centuries and tried to
understand local competition of different nationalisms along with the
end of the Ottoman Empire as well as the root causes of World War I.

At no point in the literature about the conference or during the
interaction with the organizers of the conference was there any
indication that the conference would center on the events of 1915 in
Anatolia and the topic of genocide denial.

Why do we need to accuse those who disagree with the Armenian version
as a genocide denier? What is the purpose of doing it? The participants
of the conference were from all over the world, including the United
States, Canada, Turkey, Russia and Georgia. Only one scholar was
from Armenia, Ara Papian. There were a few Armenian scholars from
the United States who have been subsequently labeled denialists.

All of the other Armenian scholars from Armenia withdrew at the last
minute due to external pressures, i.e., the government of Armenia. It
is not the job of a government to instruct scholars what to study and
how to study the subject matter. The Republic of Armenia should not
constrain academic debate and not penalize those who do not subscribe
to the official Armenian historiography. This goes against the core
of academic freedom.

At no point during the conference did the scholars deny that there
was suffering in Anatolia in 1915 or before. This is an important
fact the Turkish government has acknowledged; there was suffering of
the people, especially Armenian. However, the Turkish government will
not describe the event as genocide due to a number of reasons. When
I asked a Turkish scholar about why Turkey refused to recognize it
as genocide, he said:

“There are three reasons: We still do not know exactly what happened.

The key source for our understanding is the Russian archives and
they have just become accessible to scholars. Second, ‘genocizing’
the events of 1915 started after 1965 and as a way of perpetrating
the image of the terrible Turk, recycling Islamophobic discourses
and turning American public opinion against a NATO ally during the
Cold War; third, given what took place in Karabakh in terms of ethnic
cleansing and [the] deliberate killing of people because they were
Turks shows the capacity of what revolutionary Armenian committees were
capable of doing. Finally, there is a powerful memory in Anatolia and
[it] identifies the Armenian revolutionary groups as villains. No
Turkish government could ignore this powerful memory.”

Thus, the Turkish government recognizes the sufferings of both the
Armenian population as well as the Muslims.

The major question some of the participants had of the events of 1915
was not whether 1915 was a genocide or not, but rather what, why and
how it happened? Some participants did, in fact, label the events
of 1915 as genocide, but there was not a reaction to the label. In
other words, people were more focused on what happened rather than
the label. Can genocide laws be applied to events that happened before
the laws were enacted? Why is it so important that the events of 1915
be called genocide? There are major problems in genocide studies.

The genocide discipline has created an environment of political
correctness that handicaps scholars and prevents them from in-depth
examination of controversial issues. The topic of genocide stirs many
emotions for those who want to be recognized as victims and those
who reject the label. The concept of victimhood has become a constant
through genocide studies. Unfortunately, Armenians have reified this
concept by “othering the Turks” as an enemy.

There is no other concept that has gripped this many Armenians:
The past is nothing but genocide and without its recognition, the
Armenians somehow lose historical and cultural significance. This
concept goes further with the notion that the Turks are guilty and
the Armenians are victims. It has become “the Church” for Armenians
both in Armenia and outside the country.

There are two issues: Do we, the Armenians, insist on a concept,
which stops any form of conversation, and also become a partner to
the perpetration of the image of the “Terrible Turk”? Second, do we
know exactly what took place in 1915? What is necessary are more
multi-disciplinary studies that represent different disciplines,
geographies and national historiographies, which was the very
purpose of the conference. Moreover, the scholars who have different
perspectives need to come together and discuss and help us to better
understand what took place without dehumanizing each other.

Archives in Russia and Turkey as well as the formerly closed
Ottoman archives are now open. The archives are important avenues to
“reconstruct the past” from those fragments and find answers, but both
sides of the argument must engage and speak to each other rather than
organizing conferences just among the believers. Armenians must not
simply follow the paradigm that the events of 1915 were genocide and
there is no other way of understanding what took place. What must be
realized by all scholars is that there are shades of gray in every
event and they should prepare to listen to the alternate narratives.

Once someone is labeled as a genocide denier, conversation and
exploration stop. Is this what we, the Armenians, want? To end the
conversation and mobilize the anti-Turkish groups, whether they are in
the United States or Anatolia, to push our version down the Turkish
throat? These tactics have not worked and will not work; instead,
they will make the Turks more resistant. Turkey is a regional power
with 80 million people and one of the fastest growing economies,
and we cannot impose our version of the past on Turkey.

The collective memory in Anatolia is diametrically different than
what we are told in the diaspora. We can only socialize and overcome
the excesses through debate and engagement to build a shared language.

What is the end goal of labeling a person a genocide denier? Will this
label cause Turkey or perhaps the United States government to change
their stance? The answer is no. Insisting on genocide will not build
any bridges with Turkey. We need to find another way of discussing
what took place. The last, well-funded campaign of the Azerbaijani
government to get the Karabakh killings to be recognized as genocide
shows that this weapon could easily be turned against Armenia as well

*Matt Haydon is a Ph.D. student at the University of Utah.

http://www.todayszaman.com/news-325995-genocide-conversation-stopper-and-the-events-of-1915-by-matt-haydon-.html

BAKU: Ilham Aliyev Responded To The Obama’s Request For Support

ILHAM ALIYEV RESPONDED TO THE OBAMA’S REQUEST FOR SUPPORT

Azerbaijan Business Center
Sept 10 2013

Baku, Fineko/abc.az. Ilham Aliyev, the President of Azerbaijan,
responded to the request for support made by Barack Obama, the USA
President.

Yesterday President Aliyev received James Warlick, the newly-appointed
Co-Chair of OSCE Minsk Group.

At the meeting they exchanged their views on current situation
and prospects for negotiations on settlement of Armenia-Azerbaijan
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

Yesterday President Obama requested President Aliyev to support
Warlick’s efforts to facilitate the process of peaceful settlement
of Armenia-Azerbaijan Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

Last week Obama said that American people elected him to stop the
wars. Up to the moment he managed to stop only the wars started by
America itself. And it’s a good question if Obama is able cope with
solving Karabakh conflict lasting from 1988.

U.S. Co-Chair Of OSCE Minsk Group: "It Is High Time To Put An End To

APA, Azerbaijan
Sept 10 2013

U.S. CO-CHAIR OF OSCE MINSK GROUP: “IT IS HIGH TIME TO PUT AN END TO THE SUFFERINGS AND HATRED LASTING FOR MORE THAN TWENTY YEARS”

[ 10 September 2013 11:21 ]

Baku. Victoria Dementyeva – APA. “I am looking forward to contributing
to the peaceful settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

It is high time to put an end to the sufferings and hatred lasting
for more than twenty years,” U.S. co-chair of OSCE Minsk Group James
Warlick said at today’s briefing in Baku, APA reports.

The co-chair said that it is important to achieve the solution of
the conflict within the OSCE Helsinki Final Act: “It’s time for both
sides to demonstrate political will and take courageous steps for
the resolution of the conflict. I am looking forward to continuing
working with my colleagues.”

Warlick said that he would meet with the OSCE Secretary General in
Vienna soon and hold meetings with his French and Russian colleagues
within the 68th session of the UN General Assembly in New York.

Following this, he will visit Yerevan and Nagorno Karabakh.

BAKU: Swedish FM: "Initialing Of Association Agreement With Armenia

SWEDISH FM: “INITIALING OF ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT WITH ARMENIA IS OFF THE TABLE”

APA, Azerbaijan
Sept 10 2013

[ 10 September 2013 14:55 ]

Baku – APA. Initialing of Association Agreement with Armenia is off
the table, Swedish FM Carl Bildt said on his Twitter, APA reports
quoting news.am

The Minister said Slovakian Vice Prime Minister and Foreign Minister
Miroslav Lajcak has agreed with him on the issue. “We agreed with
Miroslav Lajcak that Association Agreement with Armenia is now off
the table. We work with Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia,” Bildt tweeted.

From: Baghdasarian

BAKU: Revealed That A Number Of Azerbaijanis Were Accidentally Inclu

REVEALED THAT A NUMBER OF AZERBAIJANIS WERE ACCIDENTALLY INCLUDED IN LIST OF KARABAKH WAR MARTYRS

APA, Azerbaijan
Sept 10 2013

[ 10 September 2013 13:04 ]

The State Service: “Facts prove that in Karabakh war, the Azerbaijani
Armed Forces suffered fewer losses than previously stated”

Baku. Rashad Suleymanov – APA. The process to redevelop the list of
Azerbaijanis, who were killed in Karabakh war and combat operations,
is expected to be completed by the end of the year, military sources
told APA.

The State Service for Mobilization and Conscription is specifying
the places in this regard and redeveloping the list. The persons,
who were killed on front shootings during the ceasefire, are also
being included in the list.

The examinations conducted by the State Service for Mobilization
and Conscription found out that a number of people were accidentally
included in the list of martyrs. There are some facts that in many
cases, servicemen, who were killed in armed conflicts beyond the
frontline in 1991-1994 and during road accidents, and civilians,
who didn’t participate in military operations, have been included in
the list of martyrs.

The State Service notes the facts revealed after the specifications
prove that in the Armenia-Armenia conflict, the Azerbaijani Armed
Forces suffered fewer losses than previously stated.

The final list will be posted on the website of the State Service
for Mobilization and Conscription.

From: A. Papazian

http://en.apa.az/news/199142

BAKU: Azerbaijan’s Deputy Foreign Minister To Leave For Yerevan

APA, Azerbaijan
Sept 10 2013

AZERBAIJAN’S DEPUTY FOREIGN MINISTER TO LEAVE FOR YEREVAN

[ 10 September 2013 17:35 ]

Baku. Victoria Dementieva – APA. Azerbaijan’s Deputy Foreign Minister
Mahmud Mammadguliyev will leave for Yerevan this week, spokesman for
the Foreign Ministry Elman Abdullayev told journalists, APA reports.

According to him, the visit aims to attend the 3rd informal meeting
of the foreign ministers of the Eastern Partnership states in Yerevan
on September 12-13.

Ambassador of Azerbaijan to the European Union Fuad Iskandarov
will also participate in the meeting. This meeting will be the last
preparatory meeting before the summit of the Eastern Partnership in
Vilnius in November.

BAKU: Kazakh Deputy PM Introduces Technical Solutions For Customs Un

KAZAKH DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER INTRODUCES TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS FOR CUSTOMS UNION MEMBERSHIP TO ARMENIAN PRIME MINISTER

Trend, Azerbaijan
Sept 10 2013

Kazakh Deputy Prime Minister Kairat Kelimbetov has introduced a
package of technical solutions necessary for Armenia joining the
Customs Union to Armenian Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan, Mediamax
reported with the reference to Armenian government press service.

Tigran Sargsyan met with Kazakh Deputy Prime Minister in Astana whilst
travelling for a working visit to China.

During the meeting the sides discussed Armenian-Kazakh relations,
economic cooperation and ways of development and prospects for the
two countries.

Last week Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan declared the country’s
decision to join the Customs Union and take the necessary practical
steps in this direction, and later to participate in the formation
of the Eurasian Economic Union.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has supported the decision and
expressed Russia’s readiness to fully contribute to the process.

From: Baghdasarian