Former Security Officer Says Azerbaijan Arms PKK In Turkey

FORMER SECURITY OFFICER SAYS AZERBAIJAN ARMS PKK IN TURKEY

Kavkaz-uzel.ru, Russia
Sept 2 2013

A former Azerbaijani security officer has accused the country’s
authorities of delivering weapons to Kurdish insurgents in Turkey. In
an interview with a Russian regional news website, Ibrahim Musayev
said Turac Zeynalov found and copied documents to this end, but was
killed by the authorities while in custody. Musayev said that at
the National Security Ministry in Azerbaijan’s exclave Naxcivan he
was in charge of obtaining information from Iran and foiled a plot
to poison a lake with drinking water in Naxcivan. He said that he
is now trying to receive a refugee status in Russia. Meanwhile, the
Azerbaijani authorities put him on the international wanted list as
a fraudster and seek his extradition from Russia.

The following is the text of Musayev’s interview by Russian Kavkazskiy
Uzel

On 2 September 2013 the Yaroslavl Region court ruled on the extradition
to Azerbaijan of Ibrahim Musayev, a member of the Naxcivan Autonomous
Republic’s National Security Ministry (NSM) who sought a refugee status
in Russia. In an interview with Kavkazskiy Uzel Musayev said that the
Naxcivan authorities engage in sale of weapons to Kurdish terrorists
in Turkey. He also said that in Azerbaijan he received the task to kill
the wife of Turac Zeynalov, a driver who worked at the airport and was
arrested on suspicion of spying for Iran. Turac Zeynalov died at the
NSM in Naxcivan. Musayev said that it was Zeynalov who accidentally
came into possession of documents that confirm deliveries of weapons
to Turkish Kurds and made copies of them.

Recruitment into security services

[Correspondent] Ibrahim, please tell us how you began working for
the Azerbaijani special service. Did you work there for long?

[Ibrahim Musayev] When I was in my ninth year in school I was accepted
to the general military school in Naxcivan. I studied enthusiastically
and liked my future profession. Armenia currently controls 20 per
cent of our lands and I have the desire to take back these lands. In
addition, I knew how to handle weapons: my father, who worked at the
Interior Ministry prior to Heydar Aliyev coming to power [in 1993],
taught me. That was back in the mid-1990s when the situation in the
country was tense. We had pistols and an assault rifle at home. I
was 16 back then.

But I was not allowed to complete my studies. I wished to pass exams
ahead of time to receive my rank as soon as possible and to commence
military service. This was possible. However, after the first year
I met at the entrance to the school a man whose name was Ilqar Haciyev.

We talked and he told me that they received reports about all students
and I was noted as one of the best. I was offered a job and told that
they will continue teaching me.

I received documents under a different name and was sent to Turkey.

First time I went there in November 2009 for three days and then in the
beginning of 2010 for two months; apparently to study, but there was
no teaching. I was given a plastic card and I just lived in a hotel
and relaxed. Upon my return they told me that I successfully passed
the first stage and did not explain what it was about. It seems they
just checked how I will behave. Later I was sent to Iran many times,
sometimes for one day and sometimes for two or three weeks.

Then in Naxcivan I began receiving specific tasks. From the beginning
of 2010 I became an intern at the National Security Ministry. My
father joined the opposition to the government when Heydar Aliyev
came to power. There was an attempt on his life and he had to leave
Azerbaijan in 2003 or 2004.

Back then I was asked what path I will choose for myself and I said
that I am ready to become a member of Aliyev’s New Azerbaijan Party,
that I will serve my nation and that my father’s political views
are of no interest to me. For 15 years I have had no contact with my
father: neither telephone calls, nor letters. He lived in Russia. And
I understand that this was done in order not to endanger us. Some
nuances concerning my father could impede my recruitment by the
national security bodies. But I competently resolved them and proved
that I was reliable.

[Correspondent] What was this about?

[Ibrahim Musayev] I was an intern of the NSM until I came of age
and fulfilled various tasks: found out sentiments among members
of an opposition party, received some information, tailed people
and listened. For example, I was tasked to find out the sentiments
among opposition activists. Information that I received was not
significant and everybody knew this. I was simply confirming what
was already known.

[Correspondent] Could there be pressure on you by remind you about your
father’s opposition views if you declined to cooperate with the NSM?

[Ibrahim Musayev] There was no pressure on me concerning the fact
that my father was in the opposition. By that time I already proved
that I have different views and willingly cooperated with the ministry.

[Correspondent] What did change after you came of age?

[Ibrahim Musayev] When I turned 18 I was told that in order to be
recruited by the government bodies I only lack a military service
ticket and a tertiary education diploma. I asked the head of my
department, Ilqar Haciyev how this matter could be settled and he
said that this can be resolved for AZN30,000. Back then I had a plot
of land, which I sold. Later I also sold two cars to buy a military
ticket. I had my own business with my brother: we were selling cars
and we were well off. As a result, I never even saw my diploma and
only received the military ticket. All other documents are in the
human resources department of the NSM. I received an employee ID
(there is a copy of it) and was recruited in the rank of a lieutenant.

This happened in 2010.

However, I realized that the bought diploma is nothing and I still
need to receive education. I began studying architecture at the
university. I dabble in drawing and therefore I passed the examinations
on my own, without any patronage from the NSM. The ministry was not
against this, but they asked that studies do not impede my work. My
wife studied in the same university to become a psychologist. (Later
both of us were expelled, for obvious reasons)

Information from Iran

[Correspondent] After you officially became an NSM staff member,
what was your task?

[Ibrahim Musayev] Initially my job was to stand at the entrance to
the town of Naxcivan and worked as an aide to the counterintelligence
officer. I had this job for less than a year and then I began working
in the counterintelligence department. There I communicated with taxi
drivers who travelled to Iran to learn who travels to Iran frequently
and what these people talk about. I had to recruit people and form a
group to constantly supply me with information. I also had a person
in Iran, who briefed me on all matters of interest to the NSM.

I was often sent to Iran – always with different passports – to gather
information among people I myself found. Thanks to one such informant
I received a tip-off about a terrorism operation being prepared in
Azerbaijan. There is a lake near Naxcivan used for drinking water.

There is no fence around it and the Iranian Ministry of Intelligence,
which possessed a network of agents in Azerbaijan, was going to poison
water in the lake. I gathered an operation group and we caught these
people. I received thanks from the head of Naxcivan, Vasif Talibov,
for the successful conduct of the operation. I was promoted and
allowed to work in accordance with my own plan.

[Correspondent] What lake were they going to poison? Were you certain
that this was a genuine plot? What is this certainty based on?

[Ibrahim Musayev] Documents say that there was such a plot and I also
had testimonies by witnesses. When I worked there I made copies of all
documents that concerned the conduct of the operations I took part in.

Later I was sent as a counterintelligence officer to the international
airport of the town of Naxcivan. The special services of Iran and
Azerbaijan are in eternal struggle and seek to carry out some acts of
terror. Those districts of Iran that border Azerbaijan are populated
with ethnic Azerbaijanis. The Azerbaijani authorities always supply
them well with all necessities. When I worked at the airport I
meticulously monitored those Iranians who most frequently travelled
back and forth between the two countries. There was talk back then
that I will specialize in Iran.

Then I was taken to the ministry and began working there. I already
had tested people then and received information from them.

PKK documents

[Correspondent] You had problems in the NSM after Turac Zeynalov was
convicted for espionage for Iran in August 2011. What happened?

[Ibrahim Musayev] They wrote in the written account of detention that
Zeynalov works with the Iranian special services, but the reality
was completely different.

Twice a week a freight carrier flows from Baku to Naxcivan and it
carries various munitions and weapons. Zeynalov worked as a driver in
the group that services these planes. The serviceman who accompanied
the cargo and who had documents about the quantity of weapons and their
destination was once drunk. When the plane was being unloaded he left
the car and forgot documents. He also sent Zeynalov on a service car
to run some errands and at this moment Zeynalov made copies of the
documents left in the car. He made this when he saw that according
to the documents all munitions from Naxcivan are sent to Turkey to
the Kurdish terrorist organization PKK (transliterated as Partiya
Karkeren Kurdistan – Kavkazskiy Uzel’s note).

Zeynalov came into possession of these documents on 2 August 2011
and was arrested on 24 August.

[Correspondent] Are you sure the authorities in Baku knew about
these deliveries?

[Ibrahim Musayev] Special locators have been installed at the border
to monitor both incoming and outgoing freight. Nobody, neither the
Azerbaijani, nor Naxcivan authorities can say that they know nothing
about this. Because these locators detect all metallic constructs. The
central monitoring of data from the locators is done from Baku.

[Correspondent] What did Zeynalov do with the copies?

[Ibrahim Musayev] He began distributing copies to his acquaintances.

He was found out and detained. Four more people were arrested. Three
of them were later released, but one was convicted for six years. But,
as far as I know, that man too has likely been released already.

Those four arrested with Zeynalov were in fact our people, who worked
for the NSM. When I asked my manager why they were arrested, he said
that these are our trumps and we will use them in the future.

These people provided false testimonies against Zeynalov as his
accomplices: as if together with him they met a member of the Iranian
intelligence service and handed over this information and photos. That
is, they slandered and framed him. Iran, by and large, had no need
for this information allegedly received from Turac.

[Correspondent] To how many acquaintances did Zeynalov provide the
copies? Does anybody have these copies today? Is it known who these
people are? What is their fate?

[Ibrahim Musayev] Zeynalov provided copies of documents to his
acquaintances in Naxcivan and also sent them abroad. The NSM does
not know these people, but I do.

Zeynalov’s detention

[Correspondent] How was Zeynalov detained?

[Ibrahim Musayev] They rang him on 24 August 2011 and he himself
came to the NSM, where he was detained and accused of espionage. At
the first questioning Turac said he understands that he was detained
over the copied documents. He also said that he was going to give the
received copies to newspapers. This was potentially an international
scandal.

The head of Naxcivan is a Kurd. Kurds in Turkey are in a state of
permanent war with the government. When viewed from the side of public
statements by politicians, Azerbaijan cooperates with Turkey and there
are no tense relations internationally. And here are weapons sent to
Kurds in Turkey from Azerbaijan. It seems that we act against Turkey.

But this has been clear to everybody long ago that Azerbaijan supports
PKK. Even Turkish TV reported that canned food from Azerbaijan was
sent to PKK. I had my guesses that there were some contacts with PKK,
but had no direct evidence.

Zeynalov is the first person who had documents on his hands. Haciyev
said that this is a very serious business concerning Azerbaijan’s
relations with Turkey and nobody wants to risk.

[Correspondent] How did it turn out that after detention Zeynalov
ended up dead?

[Ibrahim Musayev] I wanted to help Turac. In this case it would have
been better if he signed the document that he actually cooperated
with the Iranian intelligence. He would have been convicted, while
I could contact international human rights organizations, provide
them with documents that Turac had and release him. But he did not
agree. He did not believe me.

I did not know Zeynalov prior to his arrest, but I knew that he had no
links with the Iranian security services and that it is our government
and the NSM leadership that committed the betrayal. I pitied him and
therefore I wanted to help him.

He was in detention until 27. Every day he was strongly tortured with
special electric equipment. He still refused to sign the documents.

Turac is not the first person to be subjected to this and not the
first one who was killed.

At 0700 [0300 gmt] on 27 August we were all at work and Ilqar Haciyev
personally told me that there is an order to execute Zeynalov. My
conversation with Haciyev took place in his office and lasted around
15 minutes. I said it was clear for everyone that Zeynalov was not
guilty. But I was told that if he is not killed then he can talk from
prison about what he knows. Haciyev said that this is a very serious
business concerning Azerbaijan’s relations with Turkey and nobody
wants to risk.

It is essential to understand that PKK receives its finances from
Naxcivan’s budget, while Naxcivan receives funds from Azerbaijan. All
hotels, filling stations, construction companies and banks in Naxcivan
are private and owned by Kurds. I have the documents concerning
the ownership registration. Millions of manats are in turnover in
Naxcivan and money are sent from there to PKK. The ministers and
MPs in Azerbaijan cannot issue any decree concerning the autonomous
republic, because they are afraid. Kurds are very strong, including
in the financial sense.

I am trying to take this case to the end. I will give my life. I
will prove and show this everywhere. I would like to show during this
[October 2013] presidential election the crimes of this government. I
have no fear for myself, but my wife, daughter, mother, brother,
aunt and her sons are in Naxcivan. Every day somebody is arrested
for several days. They broke the telephone shop they owned. My aunt
was fired from work.

Since I am a former employee of the Azerbaijani security service,
no country in the world will accept me as a refugee or provide me
with a political shelter.

[Correspondent] You said that your wife came to Russia with you. Why
is she in Azerbaijan now?

[Ibrahim Musayev] She left in the beginning of 2013 because I lacked
funds to keep her and the child here.

Zeynalov’s execution

[Correspondent] Did you see Zeynalov’s execution?

[Ibrahim Musayev] When it came to the execution, I was with Tamahov, a
NSM staff member in charge of tapping and secret video surveillance. I
came with him and everything that happened during the killing of
Zeynalov was filmed. I did not participate or watch this.

Turac was killed with the use of a jack-winch. When this happens, they
put a noose around the neck, tie the legs and the neck is literally
thorn out using tension. The man dies within five seconds. They killed
Turac. He was 33 or 34. This happened on 27 August. (Although it is
written everywhere, for some reason, that this was on 28 August).

Then they discussed how to justify Zeynalov’s death for the relatives,
although this was already partially prepared. They decided to make
an autopsy and the expert will say that Turac died from a thrombus
formation in the lung. The marks of torture by electricity and beatings
were still very visible, so they also wrote that he had a skin cancer.

But I asked how to explain the traces from the noose on the neck. This
would become a high-profile case because all relatives knew that Turac
was summoned to the National Security Ministry. Then they decided that
they will cut the head along the trace of the noose and then sew it
back. As if the forensic medical expert did so, although this is not
usually done during autopsy.

Zeynalov’s relatives

[Correspondent] How did relatives react to Zeynalov’s death?

[Ibrahim Musayev] At first the body was not given to them, but human
rights activist Malahat Nasibova made a stir. The minister then said
that if Malahat is here, then there will be a scandal and they decided
to hand over the body.

[Correspondent] When did they give the body?

[Ibrahim Musayev] They returned the body on 28 August. The relatives
filmed the moment and put the video on the internet. Then they buried
him. Everybody in the village where Zeynalov lived was warned that
they will be fired from jobs if they attend the funerals. But people
still came. There were many people.

These are actually hard times in Azerbaijan. In a village neighbours
are not aware who informers are. There are many informants. People
cannot make money and for little money they can even betray their
brother.

After the funerals the relatives of Turac were told not to raise a stir
and promised that they will receive a compensation of 50,000 manat
(As of 31 August 2013 the Russian Federation Central Bank’s exchange
rate for one Azerbaijani manat is R42.4182 – Kavkazskiy Uzel’s note)
and drop the charges. The relatives waited for the NSM to pay them
this money as compensation and close the case, but the case was not
closed. The diseased was convicted for high treason and received a
sentence, although there is no legal basis for this. This was done
in order to fire his relatives and hurt them – as relatives of the
national traitor.

The relatives waited for 50,000 manat for three months, but the
minister did not give even 0.5 manats. The NSM had to gain some time.

Malahat suggested making a stir, but only three months later did
relatives asked her for help. Then Turac’s father, Turac’s wife Gulnar
Agayeva and Malahat Nasibova flew to Baku and began appealing to all
human rights organizations, the UN mission and so on. They were hurt
to the extent that they had no claims and only asked that their son
be acquitted. This is a shame for the family.

In November 2011 I was given the task to compromise Turac’s wife as my
lover, to sleep with her and secretly film this. This is very serious
for a Caucasian woman. There was also a task to catch her with drugs,
for me to suggest that she become a drug courier. For a long time I
refused to do this and I was threatened not with demotion, but with
hurting my relatives: mother, brother and aunt. I had no options.

Order to kill

[Correspondent] That is, you compromised her?

[Ibrahim Musayev] I did everything I was told. Back in November 2011 in
Baku after the first telephone conversation she got in touch with me
and agreed to meetings. I have all records, all video recordings and
communication via Facebook. Gulnara refused to carry drugs, but she
had an affair with me and this secretly filmed. Tamahov was in charge
of filming. This all happened in Baku and then continued in Naxcivan.

Several people from the NSM in the police uniform broke into the flat
in Naxcivan when Gulnara was naked. They found drugs with me and her.

They filmed her naked for a long time.

In August 2012 she called our minister Asgarov and told him that she
knows a NSM operative set her up and that she will pursue this to
the end. She wanted to tell journalists about this.

In the summer 2012 (I was already married then) I was told that I have
to kill her. They feared the noise that she may make. This would hurt
the ministry’s standing and those above.

I said that I will not kill and wanted to leave, but I heard the
pistol’s bolt clicking. I thought that I will be shot now and turned
around, but the minister had put the pistol to his own head and while
shaking accused me of framing him. I went back and we talked. Later
I kept on dragging this out.

[Correspondent] What is happening with Gulnara now?

[Ibrahim Musayev] Now she cooperates with them. She says on camera
that her husband died from fear after committing a treason. She
confirms that he was sick and that he had a cancer. She says that
she has no claims.

Refugee status

[Correspondent] Please tell us how you ended up in Russia.

[Ibrahim Musayev] I arrived in Russia on 2 September 2012, and my
wife joined me on 12 September. She was pregnant then.

Until December we lived in Yaroslavl. Then me and my relatives noted
that strangers take photos of me on the street and it became clear
that I am being followed. In January we decided to refer to an NGO in
Moscow, Civil Assistance, in order to receive the refugee status. We
began preparing documents. I was given a document instead of the
passport and a certification of application for refugee status. They
took the Azerbaijani passport. Civil Assistance helped us much.

When I was in the Federal Migration Service I was told that I was
put on the international wanted list starting from 14 December 2012
by the Azerbaijani special services and that they want me sent back
to Azerbaijan. They will silence me for good, kill me, if this happens.

They want me to keep silent because I have information about staff
members of the NSM in the town of Naxcivan, and there are copies of
documents concerning all operations I took part in.

On 2 January 2013 I applied for the refugee status. My application
was to be considered within three months, but I was arrested after
one month.

[Correspondent] Why did you choose Russia?

[Ibrahim Musayev] My father has lived here for 15 and I hoped he
will help.

Remaining documents

[Correspondent] How did you manage to leave Azerbaijan?

[Ibrahim Musayev] I did not flee Azerbaijan and came to Russia
legally. The NSM of Naxcivan and the NSM of Azerbaijan were aware,
they sent me to Russia. I will not say what the goal was. Then they
sent my wife too after 10 days. I ceased any links with the NSM after
my wife came. There are some nuances, but I cannot talk about them
because of security concerns.

I have video and audio recordings of the Azerbaijani president,
head of the Naxcivan Autonomous Republic and our minister. There are
documents. I can give all of it even today. But I require support and
I cannot get it in Russia. I have to leave Russia. Here I spent six
months in a remand centre as a person on the international wanted list
as a fraudster – allegedly I took from somebody R90,000 for a wedding.

But there is no written evidence. These are not even specific money
I allegedly borrowed. Products for the wedding were bought with this
money. Moreover, this concerns civil law, not criminal law.

Trial in Russia

[Correspondent] How did you end up in the remand centre?

[Ibrahim Musayev] I was in Moscow when my daughter was born, then
we went to Yaroslavl and I was arrested on 5 February 2013 in my
father’s house by the Federal Migration Service. They sent me to a
remand centre in the Frunze regional body of internal affairs. The
trial was on 7 February.

They treated me very roughly in the remand centre and beat me several
times. I suffer from pneumonia and now I find it hard to breath and
move. Over the six months in the remand centre only three times I
was allowed to receive deliveries. Why was this? Because there were
directives. Because Azerbaijani officials agreed with their Russian
counterparts that I will be handed over to them.

I left the remand centre because the allowed period of detention
expired and was detained just five minutes later. They began to prepare
a ridiculous written account: you have been in Russia illegally since
May and after the court rules today you will be extradited. I told them
that I was in the remand centre since May and that my registration
must be documented. I did not sign the written account. They took me
to court, but the judge refused them.

But I committed to not leaving the country, even though the article
under which I was put on the international wanted list is simply
absurd.

There is no justice, no law here in Russia!

[Translated from Russian]

Exhibition In Geneva Raises Awareness Of Armenian Genocide

EXHIBITION IN GENEVA RAISES AWARENESS OF ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

States News Service
September 12, 2013 Thursday

GENEVA

The following information was released by the Presbyterian Church
(U.S.A.):

The World Council of Churches (WCC) and the Armenian Apostolic Church
are hosting a one-month exhibition on the Armenian genocide, displaying
information on the history of genocidal events in the Ottoman Empire
which killed more than a million Christian Armenians between 1915
and 1923.

Open to the public until Sept. 30, the exhibition is being held at
the Ecumenical Center here, addressing the theme Because I live,
you too shall live. (John 14:19).

The exhibition is organized by the Armenia Inter-Church Round Table
Foundation.

At the opening of the exhibition, Fr. Mesrop Parsamyan, vicar general
of the South from the Armenian Diocese of France, said, People need
to know what happened

Knowing the history of the Armenian genocide is one way to make sure
that such atrocities never happen again. There is still a need for
churches, communities and governments to recognize the Armenian
genocide, and condemn these events in order to pave the way for
reconciliation and healing of the scars from the past, said Parsamyan.

The Armenian genocide has been recognized as the first genocide of
the 20th century, with several historians documenting the number of
Armenians killed at around 1.5 million. It is alleged that their
deaths were brought about by agents of the Ottoman Empire through
deportation, torture, starvation and massacres.

Turkey, however, denies that there was a planned campaign to eliminate
Armenians but says both Turks and Armenians lost their lives during
World War I and in the post-war years. Turkey also says no more than
300,000 Armenians lost their lives in the clashes.

Parsamyan went on to say that the exhibition on Armenian genocide is
timely given the theme of the WCC 10th Assembly, God of life, lead us
to justice and peace. The WCC assembly is set to take place from Oct.

30-Nov. 8 in Busan, Republic of Korea.

The God of life has let Armenians carry on their journeys for justice
and peace, he said. The WCC assembly theme is important for the
Armenians who are demanding condemnation of the Armenian genocide
from the international community, added Parsamyan.

Isabel Apawo Phiri, the WCCs associate general secretary for public
witness and diakonia, voiced appreciation for the exhibition project
and affirmed the WCCs support of the initiative.

We acknowledge and recognize the injustice faced by Armenian Christians
during the genocide, said Phiri. It is a pity that after so many
years the Armenian genocide is still not acknowledged. This is why
initiatives like this exhibition are important, she added.

Phiri also mentioned the WCCs efforts in the past toward recognition
and condemnation of the Armenian genocide.

The WCC 6th Assembly at Vancouver, Canada in 1983 issued a report
focusing on the historic realities of the Armenian massacre and its
aftermath, while the WCC member churches have commemorated an annual
remembrance day of the Armenian genocide for several years.

The exhibition displays banners in English and French, attracting
the local and international community in Geneva, and will travel to
other countries.

Drexel Collaborates With USC Shoah Foundation To Access Visual Histo

DREXEL COLLABORATES WITH USC SHOAH FOUNDATION TO ACCESS VISUAL HISTORY ARCHIVE OF HOLOCAUST AND OTHER GENOCIDES

States News Service
September 12, 2013 Thursday

PHILADELPHIA, PA

The following information was released by Drexel University:

Drexel University is now the second collegiate site in Pennsylvania
with access to the USC Shoah Foundation’s entire Visual History
Archive of nearly 52,000 testimonies of survivors and witnesses to
the Holocaust and other genocides.

The announcement was made by Executive Director Stephen D. Smith and
the Board of Councilors of the USC Shoah Foundation Institute for
Visual History and Education in conjunction with the 20th Anniversary
Benefit Screening of Steven Spielbergs epic film Schindlers List,
commemorating both the films release and the establishment of the
USC Shoah Foundation. The event was held Thursday, Sept. 12 at
the newly-reopened Prince Music Theater and featured special guest
Liam Neeson, who starred as German industrialist Oskar Schindler in
the film.

We are delighted to welcome Drexel University as the 45th site
worldwide to have full access to the Visual History Archive, said
Smith. The testimonies will support scholarship and research for
Drexel students and faculty across their wide range of academic
disciplines. The USC Shoah Foundation is looking forward to Drexels
contributions to our shared mission of educating the next generation

Stephen A. Cozen, longstanding member of the USC Shoah Foundations
Board of Councilors and Founder and chairman of noted international
law firm Cozen OConnor, who, with Smith made the announcement at
the event, said, As one of the finest academic institutions in the
country, Drexel brings honor to the group of archive sites across
the globe. On behalf of the USC Shoah Foundation we look forward to
a successful collaborative relationship that will help us continue to
grow and increase our impact on future generations through education
and such educational initiatives as IWitness.

Established in 1994 by Steven Spielberg to collect and preserve
the testimonies of survivors and other witnesses of the Holocaust,
the USC Shoah Foundation’s Institute for Visual History and Education
maintains one of the largest video digital libraries in the world with
nearly 52,000 video testimonies in 33 languages and from 57 countries,
and is now expanding its collection to include testimonies from the
1994 Rwandan Tutsi genocide, and fundraising to add collections from
the Armenian and Cambodian genocides.

I am delighted that the USC Shoah Foundation has chosen Drexel to
share the Visual History Archive, and excited that our mission
of advancing knowledge and society will include connecting our
community and all of Greater Philadelphia to this unique resource,
said Drexel President John A. Fry. Eyewitness testimonies like these,
and the scholarship they inspire, can be powerful tools in the quest
to overcome intolerance.

The Shoah Foundation has a long history in Philadelphia where its
regional office was based and helped coordinate the training of local
residents as interviewers and videographers. More than 600 testimonies
were taken in Pennsylvania. Additionally, more than 900 teachers
across Pennsylvania and over 12,000 nationally have been trained
on Echoes and Reflections, a multimedia curriculum developed by the
Institute and partners the Anti-Defamation League and Yad Vashem.

Farmers Share Raisins To Help St. Gregory’s In Fowler

FARMERS SHARE RAISINS TO HELP ST. GREGORY’S IN FOWLER

Fresno Bee, CA
Sept 13 2013

Published: September 13, 2013
By Ron Orozco – The Fresno Bee

St. Gregory The Illuminator Armenian Apostolic Church in Fowler is
nestled in a part of Fresno County that is known as raisin capital
of the world.

Nearly half of St. Gregory’s 150 dues-paying members are raisin
growers or have farming roots in their family history.

Raisins are like gold.

So when it comes to fundraisers, the Fowler church, consecrated on
April 11, 1910, is tapping into what’s in its neighborhood.

For the third season now, church officials are asking parishioners
who are raisin growers to donate bins of raisins – rather than cash –
to the church’s fundraiser, known as the Raisin Roundup.

Letters were sent in August to more than 300 people on the church
mailing list. The plan is simple. Growers sign up to donate a bin or
two. Then, members of St. Gregory’s parish council pick up the bins
and deliver them to local packers, where the church is paid the going
rate per ton. It takes about two bins to reach a ton. In recent years,
the rate has ranged between $1,700 and $2,000 a ton.

In 2011, the Raisin Roundup’s first campaign, 24 bins were donated.

They weighed about 12 tons. The going rate was $1,700, so St. Gregory
made about $20,000.

Last year, 18 bins weighed nearly 9 tons and raised about $14,000.

The money each year goes into the church’s general fund, which is
used for the church’s annual budget. This year, St. Gregory’s budget
is $250,000.

The Rev. Yeghia Hairabedian, pastor of St. Gregory, says parishioners
have been giving crops to their churches for a long time.

“Traditionally, the church would receive animals or food crops to
support the church and clergy,” he says. “It goes back to centuries-old
customs.”

Hairabedian believes the Raisin Roundup is a creative way for
parishioners to give as well as think about how God has blessed them.

“This is a very active way of encouraging people to give from the
abundance that God grants to them,” he says.

“In the case of grapes, this is especially significant because every
August on the Feast of the Virgin Mary – mother of God – we celebrate
her honor with the blessing of grapes on the holy altar, and grapes
celebrate our thanksgiving offering to God.”

David Shapazian was chairman of St. Gregory’s parish council in
2011, when the church first discussed asking raisin growers in the
congregation to give part of their crop – and others to come on board.

“We’re based in Selma and Fowler, the raisin capital of the world,”
he says. “Why not ask someone to donate a bin of raisins instead of
a cash donation?

“It’s been a real eye-opener, a success. We’re pretty happy with it.”

So far this year, the Raisin Roundup has signed up promises from
growers to donate 10 bins. The campaign runs through the end of
September when prices will be determined.

Shapazian has stayed closely involved in the campaigns.

“I am willing to get every bin,” he says. “I say, ‘Have a bin? Where
is it? I’ll go get it.’ ”

Growers receive a tax write-off for their donations, but the growers
who have donated to the Raisin Roundup say their reasons for giving
are more than for tax deductions.

“There are quite a bit of farmers at our church,” says Dennis Peters,
a St. Gregory parishioner for nearly 40 years. He farms about 300
acres, with grapes, peaches, plums and tangerines, between Fowler
and American avenues.

“Armenians, when they came here to the Valley, went into farming and a
lot of them still pass on their farms to family. Others pursue other
career, but they have kept the farm and farm on the side.

“It’s just a nice way to give some money to the church, by giving a
little bit of your crops.”

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.fresnobee.com/2013/09/13/3496302/farmers-share-raisins-to-help.html

Tehran: Hundreds Of Iranian Armenian Athletes Compete In Tehran

HUNDREDS OF IRANIAN ARMENIAN ATHLETES COMPETE IN TEHRAN

Press TV, Iran
Sept 13 2013

Tehran is hosting the 45th round of Iranian Armenian games at Ararat
sports complex. Almost 900 Iranian Armenian athletes are taking part
in the ten-day event. Competitions are held in nine fields among them
football, basketball, tennis, table tennis, swimming, chess, track and
field, and rock climbing. This year, one team from Armenia is taking
part in the event. In the last world Armenian games, the first place
went to Armenia while Iranian Armenians stood second. Aside from
being a sports event these games provide an opportunity for Iranian
Armenian families to spend time together in joy and happiness.

Watch video at

From: A. Papazian

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/09/13/323741/45th-iranian-armenian-games-kick-off-in-tehran/

Gunfire As Extension Of Politics On Azeri-Armenian Border

GUNFIRE AS EXTENSION OF POLITICS ON AZERI-ARMENIAN BORDER

Institute for War and Peace Reporting, UK
IWPR Caucasus Reporting #701
Sept 13 2013

Mutual recriminations as both sides note a rise in cross-border
shooting.

By Vahe Harutyunyan, Jasur Sumerinli – Caucasus

While cross-border gunfire involving Azerbaijani and Armenian force
is all too common, a recent sharp increase in incidents has left
analysts wondering what is going on.

The consensus is that the skirmishes are not a precursor to wider
hostilities. Instead, commentators on each side believe they are a
reflection of domestic political problems in the other country.

As an illustration of the rise in shooting incidents, Armenian defence
officials said that one soldier died and six were injured in August,
whereas there had been no casualties in July.

The incidents happened on Armenia’s eastern border with Azerbaijan,
on its southeastern frontier with Nakhichevan – an Azerbaijani exclave
territory – and on the “line of control” around Nagorny Karabakh.

Armenian defence ministry spokesman Artsrun Hovhannisyan said the
nature of the “enemy action” was unusual.

“This isn’t reconnaissance, nor is it designed to improve their
position, or to prepare for sweeping military operations,” he said.

“The Azerbaijanis’ aim is to inflict as much harm as possible on our
military personnel.”

In Azerbaijan, officials said it was the Armenians who started or at
least provoked the shooting. The defence ministry said its monitoring
indicated that most of the gunfire was taking place around Karabakh
and on the border with Nakhichevan.

Defence ministry spokesman Eldar Sabiroglu said the Armenians were
trying to divert public attention from their government’s own failings.

“We know that Armenia’s domestic affairs are in bad shape. People
express their unhappiness with the authorities every day. In order
to mitigate this, they [authorities] try to project attention onto
Azerbaijan,” he said. “This is always going to be a problem. Armenia’s
aggressive policy has not changed, so there will continue to be
trouble on the front line.”

Sabiroglu also spoke about a particular incident in early August, on
the border between Armenia and Nakhichevan. According to the Armenian
account, one soldier was killed and a second injured by Azerbaijani
sniper fire. But Sabiroglu described this as “an attempt by Armenia
to divert attention from problems inside its own army”.

“They’re trying to cover up the fact that there was a shootout between
Armenian soldiers, We have reliable information that several soldiers
died and several more were injured in a shootout in an Armenian
military unit deployed on the border with Nakhichevan,” he said.

A mirror-image view of the situation was articulated in Yerevan.

Alexander Arzumanyan, a former foreign minister of Armenia, said the
clashes were being instigated by Azerbaijan, where the authorities are
keen to ensure the re-election of President Ilham Aliyev next month.

“The Azerbaijanis have resorted to deliberately escalating tensions
on the border ahead of general and presidential elections on more than
one occasion,” he said. “It’s the familiar policy of the Aliyev clan –
dictatorships always need an external enemy.”

Arzumanyan pointed to the widening military imbalance between oil-rich
Azerbaijan and less affluent Armenia. Baku continues to purchase
high-tech weaponry, and President Aliyev and other officials often
warn that if talks on the future of Karabakh ultimately fail, the
army is capable of retaking it by force.

Armenian officials are clearly unsettled by this build-up, but hope
their longstanding alliance with Moscow will safeguard them. (See
Neighbourhood Watches as Azerbaijan Arms Up.)

Despite the threats coming out of Baku, Arzumanyan said, “the years
go by, and the Karabakh problem remains unresolved”.

The Karabakh conflict ended in 1994 with a truce that has lasted ever
since, despite the sporadic outbreaks of gunfire. Talks intended to
produce a lasting settlement are mediated by the OSCE’s Minsk Group,
chaired by Russia, the United States and France, but have failed to
make significant progress. The Karabakh Armenian administration says
it will never give up its claim to independence, while Baku insists
that the ultimate solution must involve regaining control over its
sovereign territory.

“There has been no substantive movement in the positions taken by
the parties to the conflict,” Arzumanyan said. “Then again, Karabakh
isn’t of such paramount importance to [external] states that it would
prompt serious pressure [for a solution] from outside.”

Even with high levels of mutual mistrust and little apparent prospect
of progress in the OSCE-mediated talks, commentators in Yerevan and
Baku are not predicting that things will get out of hand.

“I do not think that the option of returning to war will be decided in
Baku alone, so I see it as unlikely that Azerbaijan would go down that
road,” David Shahnazaryan, former head of Armenia’s National Security
Service, told IWPR. “What I mean is that a number of states are active
in this region, and they are driven by they own interests and by the
fact that they have a political, military and economic presence –
there’s Russia, the United States, Turkey, the European Union and
Iran. I wouldn’t say any of these countries wants to unleash a war
in the South Caucasus.”

Zumrud Mammadova, a researcher at the Simulated Forecasts think-tank
in Baku, agreed that none of the big players wanted conflict.

“Analysis of what’s going on indicates that neither Armenia nor
Azerbaijan is preparing for war,” she added. “Each side wants to
show its strength and insure itself against current and possible
international responses to its domestic problems. Armenia and
Azerbaijan are doing this to get round the international community’s
demands for democracy.”

Dashdemir Aliyev, a retired lieutenant-colonel in the Azerbaijani
army who now heads a veterans’ group, agreed with this point.

“Armenia and Azerbaijan have identical interests in this respect. Both
want to show the international community that they face problems
that are a lot more important than democracy, and hence ward off
international pressure,” he said.

On the Armenian side, Shahnazaryan predicted that the use of
small-scale warfare as a continuation of politics would continue.

“I believe tensions on the Armenian-Azerbaijani border will persist,
rising and falling on a regular basis,” he said. “The situation that
now pertains will continue for a long time since no new initiatives
have emerged in the OSCE Minsk Group [talks] format.”

Jasur Mammadov Sumerinli is a defence affairs reporter with the Zerkalo
newspaper in Azerbaijan. Vahe Harutyunyan is a freelance journalist
in Armenia.

http://iwpr.net/report-news/gunfire-extension-politics-azeri-armenian-border

Experts Discuss Mediation In Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict

EXPERTS DISCUSS MEDIATION IN NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT

Vestnik Kavkaza, Russia
Sept 13 2013

13 September 2013 – 9:01pm

The Nagorno-Karabakh peace process was enlivened this week by OSCE
Minsk Group co-chair James Warlick’s visit to Azerbaijan and Armenia.

The official brought US President Barack Obama’s message to the
authorities of the two states.

The US president called upon Azerbaijan and Armenia to enhance their
efforts in order to resolve the Karabakh conflict. The parties should
start direct talks within the next several months, the message said.

Vestnik Kavkaza discussed the situation surrounding the peace talks
with Professor of the Western University Fikret Sadykhov and Director
of the Caucasus Institute Alexander Iskanderyan.

Sadykhov stressed that Azerbaijan and Armenia have different approaches
to the issue. In addition to Nagorno-Karabakh itself, Armenia has also
occupied seven districts of Azerbaijan. This territory is recognized as
part of Azerbaijan by the whole international community, he underlines.

Speaking about the mediators’ role in the peace process, the expert
said that the OSCE managed to stop violence in the 90s. However,
he expressed regret that the international community seems unable to
change the status quo, which is absolutely unacceptable now.

Alexander Iskanderyan believes that the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict
affects the whole region. Such powers as Turkey and Iran cannot stand
aside from this conflict, he says. It’s not a bilateral issue, the
expert stresses.

Iskanderyan believes that it’s strange to blame the OSCE mediators for
the fact that the peace talks are not successful. The international
community cannot solve the problem instead of the participants in
the conflict, he says.

http://vestnikkavkaza.net/news/politics/45092.html

To EU Or Not To EU: Eastern Partnership Countries At The Crossroads

TO EU OR NOT TO EU: EASTERN PARTNERSHIP COUNTRIES AT THE CROSSROADS

EconoMonitor
Sept 13 2013

Authors: Andris Strazds & Thomas Grennes · September 13th, 2013 ·

In 2008 Poland and Sweden launched the European Union’s Eastern
Partnership initiative. Its aim was to provide a venue for discussions
on trade and other issues with the former Soviet Union states of
Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine with
the prospects of concluding Free Trade Agreements, liberalizing
visa regimes and embracing other forms of closer cooperation. In
2011 Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan came up with a rival idea of
establishing the Eurasian Union and in 2012 established a Customs
Union comprising these three countries. Russia has recently been
pushing the Eastern Partnership countries other than Belarus to join
the Customs Union. In August it introduced temporary extra checks
on imports from Ukraine (Reuters). More recently imports of Moldovan
wines and spirits have been banned by Russia (Nielsen). Armenia has
apparently already given in to this pressure (The Moscow Times). Ahead
of the Vilnius Summit at the end of November the Eastern Partnership
countries face the fundamental choice whether to proceed on the path
of deeper trade integration with the EU or join the Customs Union
led by Russia (the options are mutually exclusive).

To answer the question, which of the two roads offers the most
promising prospects for the Eastern Partnership countries, it is first
worth looking at the past experience of those countries in the Central,
Eastern and Southern Europe that have chosen the path of integration
with the European Union and are now members of the EU.

Then this experience can be compared with the record of the current
Eastern Partnership countries.

Let’s start with the new EU member states. With Romania and Bulgaria
having joined in 2007 and Croatia being taken on board in July of this
year there are 13 of them (the other 10 joined in 2004). We have looked
at how successful these countries have been at closing the income gap
with the richest EU member states. As the country for benchmarking we
have selected Germany, a large and diversified high income economy. We
have looked at how the PPP-adjusted GDP per capita has changed in
the new EU member states relative to Germany from 1995 to 2012.

1995 was the year when countries in Central and Eastern Europe had
already left the shock of initial adjustment to a market economy
behind them. Most of them started active integration efforts with
the EU shortly thereafter, however, it took about a decade for
these efforts to lead to actual membership. In addition, 1995-2012
is a period for which comparable data are available from the World
Bank for all of the countries included in our analysis. This sample
period also includes the shock coming from the Great Recession and
the subsequent debt problems of several EU countries.

The convergence record of the 13 countries can be seen below:

There are four countries (Cyprus, Malta, Slovenia and the Czech
Republic) where the relative income levels were already relatively
high in 1995 (58% of the level in Germany or higher). These countries
have achieved relatively little convergence with Germany since then.

However, all of the other nine countries, whose PPP-adjusted GDP per
capita in 1995 were at 40% of the German level or below, have seen
substantial convergence with Germany. Hungary, the relatively worst
performer, has seen its income relative to Germany increase from 40%
in 1995 to 52% in 2012, while Lithuania has improved from 28% in 1995
to 58% in 2012.

Let us now look at how the Eastern Partnership countries have fared
relative to Germany during the same period of time (please note the
change of scale on the vertical axis):

All of these six countries in 1995 were poorer than the 13 EU member
states analyzed above, but with the exception of Belarus and more
lately Azerbaijan, they have failed to achieve much convergence with
the German level of income. Moldova, the most extreme example, was
at 7% of the level of Germany in terms of per capita GDP in 1995 and
has improved just to 8% in 2012. From the convergence perspective we
can clearly speak of a lost generation there. Armenia, Georgia and
Ukraine have not performed much better.

Let us now add Russia to the picture (please note again the change
of scale):

We can see that Russia, similarly to the nine current EU member states
that started in 1995 at or below 40% of the German level of income,
has also achieved substantial convergence with Germany. A detailed
analysis of the reasons for Russia’s rapid convergence is beyond
the scope of this post, however, oil and gas export revenues have
certainly played an important role in it. However, what is equally
obvious from the above chart is that while Russia’s convergence has
been impressive, it has not helped pull Armenia, Georgia, Moldova and
Ukraine along. Now these countries are facing the choice of whether
to continue on the path of deeper integration with Russia or attempt
closer integration with the EU instead. Armenia has already made up
its mind, presumably because of other than economic considerations.

Countries choose trading partners for many reasons, but based on
income convergence, the choice in favour of the EU as the partner for
deeper integration appears to be a no-brainer for Moldova, Georgia
and Ukraine, despite potential short term shocks that it will entail.

References

Nielsen, Nikolaj, ~DRussia Bans Moldova Wine Ahead of EU Summit”,
EU Observer, 11 September 2013

Reuters (2013), ~DRussia Tightens Customs Rules
to Force Ukraine into Union”, 15 August 2013

The Moscow Times (2013), ~DArmenia Will
Join Customs Union”, 5 September 2013

See tables and graphs at

http://euobserver.com/foreign/121388
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/15/russia-ukraine-customs-idUSL6N0GG17S20130815
http://www.themoscowtimes.com/business/article/armenia-will-join-customs-union/485525.html
http://www.economonitor.com/thoughtsacrossatlantic/2013/09/13/to-eu-or-not-to-eu/

Cement Production Rises In Armenia

CEMENT PRODUCTION RISES IN ARMENIA

World Cement
Sept 13 2013

According to local press reports, cement production in Armenia reached
235 600 t in January – July 2013, 6.2% higher than the corresponding
period in 2012. Around 92 500 t of cement produced in Armenia was
exported to Georgia in 1H13.

Lime production also increased in the first seven months of this year,
rising by 13.9% y/y from 14 676 t to 16 722 t.

The Tehran Times has also reported that Iran plans to hold a trade
fair in Yerevan, Armenia, in mid-October. Cement, limestone, plastics
and oil are among the products that Iran exports to Armenia. The two
countries agreed to expand bilateral trade ties in July of this year.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

http://www.worldcement.com/news/cement/articles/Cement_lime_production_increases_in_Armenia_175.aspx#.UjO8V8RzZMs

Martin Sieff On Resolution Of The Karabakh Conflict

MARTIN SIEFF ON RESOLUTION OF THE KARABAKH CONFLICT

Vestnik Kavkaza, Russia
Sept 13 2013

13 September 2013 – 1:01pm

Interview by Anna Demchenko exclusively to Vestnik Kavkaza

The leading analyst of The Globalist, Martin Sieff, told Vestnik
Kavkaza about chances for settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict,
considering appointment of James Warlick the co-chairman of the Minsk
Group of the OSCE from the U.S.

– Obama has praised Warlick, saying that “his recent appointment is an
important sign of the United States’ strong and unequivocal commitment
to assisting the parties to achieve a peaceful settlement of the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.” Why was he appointed as the US co-chairman
at the OSCE? What in his personality and background indicates that
he will find a way out of the current situation with the negotiations?

– Mr. Warlick is an extremely experienced figure and his whole track
record has been in the area of constructive negotiations. This is
extremely important. The U.S, if under President George W. Bush and
even when Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State, have an unfortunate
track record of imposing its own dictats on the organization for
security and cooperation in Europe (the OSCE). The most striking
example of this came at the OSCE summit in Kazakhstan, Astana, in
December 2010, almost three years ago, when then-Secretary of State
Hilary Clinton simply refused to take on board or cooperate with a
Russian-crafted initiative. That would have put more resources behind
OSCE efforts to combat transnational crime across Eurasia, Clinton’s
position was that the OSCE should be primarily an organization to
promote democracy in American terms across Eurasia and it should not
become a more active player on the issue of transnational crime. This
was a very unfortunate position. And it was not negotiated. It was
a dictat of Secretary Clinton. However, now we have John Kerry as U.S.

Secretary of State. And he has sent very different signals to Moscow,
Beijing and other capitals in the world. John Kerry was a professional
diplomat and a very successful one in the U.S. Foreign Service decades
before he became a U.S. senator. He sat in the senate with distinction
for more than a quarter of a century. And he’s brought those qualities
of a team player, the qualities of a diplomat, the qualities of a
figure who regards experience as important, who regards diplomacy
as important, who regards it important to listen to what the other
parties have to say, and try to negotiate agreements that will fit
their concerns as well. This is also behind his clear recommendation
and choice of Mr. Warlick to co-chair the OSCE. And this has very
positive implications for the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and for other
disputed issues in the Caucasus.

– In what ways do you expect the USA to optimise efforts aimed at a
Nagorno-Karabakh settlement?

– Such issues can only be peacefully resolved when the United States
and Russia, together, line up their appropriate sides and supporters
and work constructively together, even when there is no guarantee of
full success, because the issues involved are so far-reaching and the
differences between, for example, Armenia and Azerbaijan positions
on Nagorno-Karabakh are so great. But when the U.S. and Russia work
constructively together, good things happen. Mr. Warlick’s appointment
is a strong indication that President Obama and Secretary of State
Kerry want good things to happen in result of Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict and in improving the effectiveness of the OSCE and in
improving U.S. and Russian cooperation in the OSCE.

– What can be expected from the visit of Warlick to Baku, Armenia
and Nagorno-Karabakh?

– I think there are further implications of this, and that is that
when Mr.Warlick flies to Baku; he will certainly be giving messages
of U.S. reassurance and support to the government of Azerbaijan,
President Aliyev. The U.S. has very good influence there and wants to
keep influence in Baku, but he will also bring another message, which
is that Baku must negotiate constructively with Armenia and the United
States expects it to; and the United States wants to work with Russia
for a peaceful resolution of this issue. Now the Azerbaijani response
to this will be very important, because while they can be securing
U.S. support, they also have to realize that they do live in the region
and that these issues in the long run need to be peacefully reconciled
and solved to the greater good and satisfaction of everyone concerned.

From: A. Papazian

http://vestnikkavkaza.net/interviews/politics/45066.html