ANTELIAS: HH Aram I visits HH Patriach Mor Ignatius Zakka I Iwas

PRESS RELEASE
Catholicosate of Cilicia
Communication and Information Department
Contact: V.Rev.Fr.Krikor Chiftjian, Communications Director
Tel: (04) 410001, 410003
Fax: (04) 419724
E- mail: [email protected]
Web:

PO Box 70 317
Antelias-Lebanon

Watch our latest videos on YouTube here:

HIS HOLINESS ARAM I VISITS HIS HOLINESS PATRIARCH MOR IGNATIUS ZAKKA I IWAS

On Friday 10 February 2012, Catholicos Aram I visited Patriarch Zakka I Iwas
in Beirut. The Patriarch was transiting from Beirut on his way to Damascus,
following a surgery in Germany.

The two Spiritual Leaders discussed relations among Oriental Orthodox
Churches, relations with the Eastern Orthodox Churches, and the situation of
their communities in Syria.

##
Photos:

http://www.ArmenianOrthodoxChurch.org/
http://www.youtube.com/user/HolySeeOfCilicia
http://www.armenianorthodoxchurch.org/v04/doc/Photos/Photos670.htm#3

Karin Ensemble to Perform Free Outdoor Concert

Karin Ensemble to Perform Free Outdoor Concert

asbarez
Saturday, February 11th, 2012

The dance ensemble in performance

GLENDALE – On Sunday, February 12, the AYF and People for People
Foundation are teaming up to host a free, one-time-only celebration
featuring Armenia’s award-winning Karin Folk Song & Dance Ensemble.
The free public event will be held from 6:30-10 PM in the St. Mary’s
Armenian Church lot (500 S. Central Ave., Glendale.

Under the guidance of the leader of the ensemble, Gagik Ginosyan, and
members of the group, attendees will have the chance to join together
and directly take part in the traditional Armenian dances of their
forefathers.

`When the People for People Foundation approached us about this event,
we found it to be an excellent opportunity to expose true Armenian
talent and unite the community around our cultural traditions,’ says
Khachig Joukhajian, a member of the AYF involved in the event’s
organizing. `To have Karin perform in Glendale like they do to huge
crowds in Yerevan is really very exciting. I think we’re very
fortunate.’

The Karin Folk Ensemble has spent the last ten years collecting the
`lost’ traditional dances of Armenia, passed down through generations
by common people in villages and towns throughout country. They have
been teaching and performing these dances in Armenia, Artsakh,
Javakhk, and throughout the world, winning countless awards and
accolades in the process. Most recently, the group won first place at
the 14th Annual World Folk Dance Festival in Palma De Mallorca, Spain.

`They’re not just an ordinary song and dance group,’ explains Mona
Lazarian, founder of People for People Foundation and the main
spearhead behind Karin’s first-ever visit to the United States. `They
are preserving Armenian folk dance in its purity and awakening the
Armenian spirit in each and every one of us. It is their love and
value for our nation, homeland and countrymen that makes their
performances truly powerful and unique.’

In addition to celebrating unity through dance, attendees will be able
to enjoy booths, food, and live music throughout the night. Members of
the ensemble will also be discussing the meaning of each dance for the
audience, many of them with Western Armenian roots. They will be
providing insight into the Armenian heritage embedded in the
traditional choreography.

Sunday’s event is being held on the occasion of the traditional
Armenian holiday of Trndez (or Tyarndarach), which is celebrated every
year on the eve of February 14th . St. Mary’s Armenian Church will
host an official observation of the holiday for the entire community
the following evening, Monday, February 13.

Participants of all ages are encouraged to attend this community
celebration and reconnect with the deep-seated roots of Armenian
culture.

Spy vs spy: secret wars waged in new spooks’ playground: Azerbaijan

The Times (London), UK
February 11, 2012 Saturday

Spy vs spy: the secret wars waged in new spooks’ playground: Azerbaijan

This small country is used to being a listening post, but its position
at the centre of activity in the present climate is a big cause for
concern.

by Sheera Frenkel reports from Baku

In a warm café in central Baku, Shimon sips his Persian tea and
grimaces at the unusually large snowdrifts outside. Near by is the
building that houses the Israeli Embassy – and Shimon’s unofficial
place of work. In all the years he has worked in Azerbaijan, he has
only been to the building once.

Shimon is one of dozens of Israeli Mossad agents who work in
Azerbaijan at any given time. His familiarity and comfort in the
country are obvious as he speaks about various towns and cities that
he has come to know.

“This is ground zero for intelligence work,” he said, having agreed to
talk on condition of anonymity. “Our presence here is quiet, but
substantial. We have increased our presence in the past year, and it
gets us very close to Iran. This is a wonderfully porous country.”

Nestled between Iran and Russia, Azerbaijan has long been a listening
post. But the recent tensions over Iran’s alleged nuclear ambitions
have brought the small country of Azerbaijan to the forefront and
established it as a pivotal hub for the spy wars being conducted
between Iran and the West.

According to Arastun Orujlu, a former Azeri counter-intelligence
officer and director of the East-West Research Centre, the capital,
Baku, is like Norway during the First World War. “Or like Casablanca
was during the Second World War. Yes, exactly like this – it is at the
centre of the spying.”

A few hours south of Baku is the border with Iran, which Shimon calls
“the grey zone” for intelligence operatives. “There is a great deal of
information there from people who regularly and freely travel across
the borders. It is unregulated – almost. Except for the Iranians who
are watching us watch them,” he said.

Dr Orujlu said that thousands of Iranian Revolutionary Guard members
were operating in Azerbaijan. He estimated that there were fewer
agents from Israel’s Mossad agency, but that they operated in a “more
effective” way. “The Iranians act in the open, they want everyone to
know that they are here. The Israelis are more subtle, like the
Americans. But in the end everyone knows they are here too.”

In his previous work in counter-intelligence, Dr Orujlu tried to keep
tabs on who was in the country and what they were working on. “But
there are so many of them and we are a small country.They play above
us,” he said.

Zazdusht Aleizada, who met The Times in the newspaper offices he runs,
said the spy networks were an “open secret” in Baku. “We all know that
they are here. The only secret is how much money they paid the
Azerbaijani Government in bribes.”

It was a sentiment echoed by half a dozen officials. Many point to the
Gabala mission defence complex in the north of the country, on the
Russian-Azerbaijani border, as a hub for intelligence work. It is here
that Russia, and increasingly the US and Europe, use advanced
surveillance equipment and radio networks to monitor Iran. It was
originally built during the Soviet era, but Dr Orujlu said that its
equipment was now “lent out” to other agencies.

The US also built two massive installations in Azerbaijan: one in the
south to monitor Iran, and another in the north to monitor Russia,
officials in Baku said.

“There is a natural relationship between Azerbaijan and Iran.
Azerbaijan is a gateway to Iran,” said Kamil Salimov, a law professor
at Baku University with former ties to the Government.

About 16 per cent of Iranians are native Azeris, many of whom live in
the northern part of Iran and enjoy visa-free travel between the two
countries.

But tensions between the two countries have recently been on the rise,
with the state-run Azerbaijani news service increasingly reporting the
mistreatment of Azeris in Iran.

“There is anger over perceived Iranian arrogance, and the fact that
Iran continues to support and grow ties with Armenia, with which
Azerbaijan has a territorial dispute,” said Mehman Aliyev, director of
the independent news agency Turan.

Israel has capitalised on such discontent and an open market in
Azerbaijan, forging business and military links over the past two
decades. Israel buys 30 per cent of its oil from Azerbaijan, and
recently awarded a lucrative gas-drilling contract off the coast of
southern Israel to an Azerbaijani company. Israel has also recently
set up a factory outside Baku, which makes approximately one third of
the parts for its drones. The unmanned aerial vehicles, which are used
to gather intelligence, are also being sold to Azerbaijan amid
speculation that a base is being constructed for a permanent mission
over Iran.

“The Azerbaijani military force is already completed in sync with the
Israeli and American systems,” Dr Orujlu said. “Largely because the
Americans have been using Azerbaijan for medevacs from Afghanistan for
years.” Shimon confirmed that the Israeli and Azerbaijani militaries
were “well acquainted” with one another.

But for residents of Azerbaijan who maintain ties to Iran, the
newfound closeness with Isreal is a subject of distress.A recent plot
to attack the Israeli Embassy in Baku is being attributed to two young
Azeris with ties to Iran. Their families said that their sons’ cases
were being blown out of proportion to set an example.

“Azebaijan is increasingly speaking up against Iran,” Mr Aleizada
said. He pointed to statements made by Azerbaijan’s ruling Yeni Party
this month that suggested changing the name of the country to “North
Azerbaijan”, arguing that “South Azerbaijan” was under the control of
Iran.

Tehran was worried by the statements, wondering how large a role
Azerbaijan could play if the West chose to launch a military strike on
Iran, Mr Aleizada said. “They sense that there is a growing distance
between their country and ours. They have responded with threats,
saying that they will start a war against their neighbouring states,
including us, if they felt threatened by Israel. This is dangerous for
us because we cannot stand against them alone and we are not sure how
much the West will help us.”

Few believe that Azerbaijani soil would be used to host large standing
armies or to launch an attack, but the nation’s role in intelligence
gathering could be invaluable.

Dr Orujlu said: “If an airstrike is launched against Iran, or Iran
should fire missiles from its own soil, the early detection system in
Gabala would be the first to know it. And so would Israel and their
friends in the West.”

From: Baghdasarian

A game in which everyone has something to lose

The Times (London), UK
February 11, 2012 Saturday

A game in which everyone has something to lose

BY: Tony Halpin

Rival powers have always jostled for influence and information in
Azerbaijan, which sits uncomfortably inside the overlapping intrigues
of Russia, Turkey and Iran. The collapse of the Soviet Union brought
the United States into the game, initially for access to Azerbaijan’s
oil reserves and to secure a route through the Caucasus to Central
Asia’s energy wealth. But more recently, the US focus on the country
has been on intelligence gathering in Iran.

Forty per cent of ethnic Azeris live inside northern Iran, both a
source of concern and a potential lever in Azerbaijan’s often
uncomfortable relationship with its neighbour. The regime of President
Aliev is suspicious of attempts by Iran to stir up Islamic
fundamentalist passions.

Azerbaijan has spent billions of dollars of oil wealth in recent years
rearming its military. The target of all this expenditure, however, is
its neighbour Armenia, with whom it has been locked in a dispute over
the region of Nagorno-Karabakh for decades. Azerbaijan has a large
western region under Armenian occupation since a military defeat in
the mid-1990s that caused a flood of refugees into the capital, Baku.
A similar influx from northern Iran that could destabilise the
government is one reason Azerbaijan fears a Western strike against
Iran.

Russia also worries about Iranian refugees into its unstable northern
Caucasus and is eager to pick up any intelligence about American and
Israeli intentions. So Azerbaijan is once again a playground for
spies.

‘The regime is suspicious of attempts by Iran to stir up Islamic passions’

From: A. Papazian

Armenian Politicians Claim Credit for France’s Genocide Law

Institute for War and Peace Reporting IWPR, UK
CRS Issue 629
February 11, 2012 Saturday

Armenian Politicians Claim Credit for France’s Genocide Law

Others say French decision was not really influenced by Yerevan.

By Hasmik Hambardzumyan

As politicians in Armenia vie to prove they prompted France to pass a
genocide denial bill, some analysts say the vote probably had more to
do with French politics than any pressure coming out of Yerevan.

On January 23, France’s Senate approved a bill making it a criminal
offence to deny that a genocide of Armenians took place in Ottoman
Turkey in 1915-16. The lower house of parliament passed the bill in
December.

“This day will be written in gold letters, and not just in the history
of friendship between the French and Armenian peoples – it will enter
the global history of human rights and create fresh mechanisms for the
prevention of crimes against humanity,” Armenian foreign minister
Edward Nalbandyan wrote in a letter to his French counterpart.

The vote was the outcome of a process lasting over two decades, driven
along by France’s half-a-million-strong Armenian diaspora.

The law would need to be signed by President Nicolas Sarkozy for it to
come into force. He is in favour, but the bill has been put on hold
following a request by some lawmakers to have France’s top
constitutional body review its legality.

The Senate decision met with hostility from Turkey, which has always
denied that genocide took place.

Some 20 other countries have officially recognised the events of
1915-16 as an Armenian genocide, though far fewer have opted to
criminalise denial.

In Armenia, the Senate vote was met with delight, with a spontaneous
demonstration outside the French embassy.

Eduard Sharmazanov, spokesman for President Serzh Sargsyan’s ruling
Republic Party, seized the initiative in claiming a diplomatic
triumph.

“I can say that the Senate’s approval of this bill demonstrates that
the Armenian authorities headed by President Sargsyan have for all
these years pursued a flexible, a correct and most importantly a
pro-Armenian foreign policy,” he said.

Levon Zurabyan of the opposition Armenian National Congress disputed
the importance of the Yerevan government’s role, saying the decision
was prompted instead by lobbying from the Armenian diaspora, as well
as by France’s desire to take a lead on human rights issues and on
change in the Middle East.

“It was these specific factors that played the decisive role,” he
said. “It’s therefore immoral for the current Armenian regime to grasp
at the laurels for this historic decision.”

Most of the Armenians in France are descended from refugees who fled
the Ottoman Empire. The community is centred on Marseille, which at
100,000 has the largest Armenian diaspora group in Europe, and
numerous cultural centres, schools and churches.

Some French politicians argued against the bill on the grounds that
Sarkozy was using it to win the Armenian vote in the run-up to the
April election. Opinion polls show Sarkozy lagging behind socialist
rival Francois Hollande.

Giro Manoyan, a leading figure in Armenia’s opposition Dashnaktsutyun
party, said campaigning for the French presidential election had
undoubtedly been a significant factor in the vote, although by no
means the only one.

Richard Giragosian, a leading analyst and director of the Regional
Studies Centre in Yerevan, said the real driving forces behind the
decision had a lot to do with French politics, both domestic and
external.

“In many ways it was about French domestic politics – Sarkozy’s
re-election. It was also a way to damage Turkey’s attempt to join the
European Union. And there is France’s desire to enhance its role in
international politics,” he said.

Giragosian suggested that the French vote might ultimately be good
rather than bad for Armenian-Turkish relations.

The two countries do not have formal diplomatic relations and the
border between them remains closed. Attempts at a rapprochement have
ground to a halt and there appears to be little impetus to revive it
at the moment.

“In the short term, because of Turkish over-reactions on the issue, it
makes diplomacy difficult,” he said. “In the medium term, however, it
may push Turkey towards restarting the normalisation of ties with
Armenia, for two reasons. First, because Turkey will start looking
east, rather than west towards the European Union. Second, Turkey may
opt to return to diplomatic engagement with Armenia as a way of
addressing the genocide issue, because it’s facing increasing pressure
over genocide recognition following the [French] vote.”

Hasmik Hambardzumyan is a journalist working for the
news site. Lusine Avagyan and Seda Muradyan from IWPR also contributed
material for this article.

Source: IWPR

Link:

http://iwpr.net/report-news/armenian-politicians-claim-credit-frances-genocide-law
www.panorama.am

Heavy snowfalls paralyze Yerevan, snow removal effort senseless

ITAR-TASS, Russia
February 10, 2012 Friday 06:51 PM GMT+4

Heavy snowfalls paralyze Yerevan, snow removal effort senseless

YEREVAN February 10

Yerevan is practically paralyzed by heavy snowfalls, which have been
on for a day. There are giant traffic jams and crowds standing at bus
stops.

City services are working hard to clear the streets of snow.
Construction companies have been asked for additional mechanization.
Yet the effort seems to be vain as more snow is falling.

Many domestic and interstate routes are closed. The Yerevan Zvartnots
International Airport and the Gyumri Airport closed at night.
“Resumption of their operations depends on weather conditions,” the
Armenian government’s main civil aviation department said. It noted
that airport runways would be cleared of snow 30-40 minutes after the
snowfall ends.

The Transport and Communications Ministry called on drivers to abstain
from traveling.

From: A. Papazian

Azerbaijan set to resolve Karabakh conflict peacefully

ITAR-TASS, Russia
February 10, 2012 Friday 06:05 AM GMT+4

Azerbaijan set to resolve Karabakh conflict peacefully

UNITED NATIONS February 10

Azerbaijan continues to adhere to a peaceful settlement of
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict with Armenia although the talks that last
for twenty years yielded no result so far, according to Azerbaijan’s
Ambassador to the United Nations Agshin Mekhtiyev.

“The ongoing political process shall be based on the settlement
formula that calls to end unlawful occupation of our territories, to
restore sovereignty and territorial integrity of Azerbaijan, to return
forcefully displaced persons home and ensure peaceful coexistence of
Azerbaijanis and Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh region within
Azerbaijan,” he told the UN Security Council on Thursday.

He urged to respect human rights and humanitarian law in
Nagorno-Karabakh and said Armenia “continues unlawful activities on
the occupied territories of Azerbaijan which aim at changing their
demographic, social, and cultural character and definitely work to
strengthen the current status quo of the occupation.”

Mekhtiyev called on the OSCE Minsk Group “to insist on the necessity
of an immediate and unconditional end to all actions which create
major barriers for the settlement of the conflict through negotiations
and on the bass of international law.”

Also on Thursday Russian Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev
discussed Nagorno-Karabakh conflict in Armenia.

From: A. Papazian

Azerbaijan might assist in reconstructing ancient appearance of Yere

Vestnik Kavkaza, Russia
Feb 11 2012

Azerbaijan might assist in reconstructing ancient appearance of Yerevan

Baku is ready to provide maps and drawings of ancient Yerevan to
recreate the historic appearance of the capital of Armenia,
administration official Fuad Akhundov told Interfax-Azerbaijan.
Earlier, the Armenian authorities informed of their intention to
restore the historic center of their capital.

“If Yerevan really wants to restore the historic character of the
city, we can provide the Armenian side with paintings and drawings,”
the chief of department of social and political department of the
presidential administration of Azerbaijan, Faud Akhundov said.

“In addition, there are pictures of famous European artists such as
Tavernier, Chardin, in particular, Russian artists depicting in detail
the Yerevani fortress of the XIX century,” he said. In addition, a
large number of drawings and plans of old Yerevan are stored in
Russian archives, Akhundov said.

“I heard about a project called “Old Yerevan,” which is talked about
in the Armenian media. But curiously enough, instead of the real
medieval center of Yerevan, which was gradually destroyed by the
authorities during the Soviet era and now in a period of independence
of Armenia, an architectural complex from the late 19th to the early
20th centuries will be reconstructed,” Akhundov mused.

According to Akhundov, it is an attempt to distort the historic image
of Yerevan.

He also recalled that, at the Palace of Sardar in the fortress of
Erivan, Alexander Griboyedov wrote his comedy “Woe from Wit” in 1827.
February 11, the day of Alexander Griboyedov “provides an occasion to
reflect on the preservation of its heritage, including the memorable
places connected with his life and work,” said Akhundov.

He also proposed to open a museum in the palace and put a memorable
plate. In order to do this, Yerevani authorities will have to restore
the palace since in 1964 is has been destroyed.
“Yerevan, claiming the name of the ancient city, has no historical
part. Those who destroyed the Erivan fortress of the XVI century,
together with all the buildings, just because it was a masterpiece of
Azerbaijani architecture are the ones to be blamed,” – said the
representative of the presidential administration of Azerbaijan.
.

From: Baghdasarian

http://vestnikkavkaza.net/news/culture/22967.html

Alice Peurala: A Woman of Steel

Salon.com
Feb 11 2012

Alice Peurala: A Woman of Steel

`They’re telling workers they’ve got to step back and do with less.
What does that mean? Not having a car? Not being able to make the
payments on their house? Not being able to send their kids to college?
Not having any money for recreation? I thought that what’s it all
about-to make the life of the worker decent and with dignity and the
ability to enjoy the things of society like culture and recreation.
Now they’re saying we’ve taken too much from the corporations.’
– Alice Puerala 1928-1986.

The fires of steelmaking burned all along the southern shores of Lake
Michigan when Alice Peurala entered US Steel’s South Works in 1953.
Today most of those fires have gone out and with them the thousands of
jobs that were once the economic support system for the Southeast
Chicago-Gary region, a region that has still not recovered in 2012.

Contrary to what you may have read, this was not a `loss’ of
manufacturing, like dropping one’s car keys in a parking lot or having
a few coins slip between your couch cushions. This was deliberate
theft and vandalism by what we now call the 1%. By failing to properly
invest in modernization, failing to see the impact of globalization,
failing to see the importance of a national industrial policy as their
foreign rivals did, and turning a deaf ear to their own workers, the
steel company owners helped create the economic disaster that we have
today. The United Steel Workers(USW), the union that represented most
of the steel mills, was trapped in an organizational structure and
bargaining model that was unprepared for the employer onslaught.

A Woman Who Refused to Take No for an Answer

When Puerala entered Chicago’s South Works mill in 1953 there were few
women employed there. Most of the women who had steel jobs as a result
of WWII had left those jobs when the men returned home. The women who
remained faced gender discrimination in hiring and promotion. Still,
Peurala found that most of the male steelworkers she encountered were
pretty decent and helped her learn the tricks of the steelmaking trade
that allowed her to do the job.

Having been an activist in the Civil Rights Movement, Chicago
steelworker Alice Peurala knew that the 1964 Civil Rights Act covered
gender as well as race. So in 1967, when she was denied a promotion
from her job in the Metallurgical Division to a better job in one of
the product testing labs, she decided to fight.

The union would not take her case so she went to the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission (EEOC).The product testing lab job was a day
job, which would give her her more time to be with her daughter in the
evenings. She had been told that since the job required overtime and
heavy lifting, she was ineligible as a woman. The EEOC determined
that the company had lied about the heavy lifting, the onerous
overtime, and the education requirements. They recommended that she
sue.

She found a lawyer willing to take her case, the young Patrick Murphy,
who freely admitted that he knew little about civil rights law, but
dedicated himself to the case anyway. After much foot-dragging, and
many objections from US Steel attorneys, a compromise settlement was
reached with pressure from the judge. Peurala would be next in line
for a product tester’s job. Then when US Steel tried to circumvent the
settlement, the judge hit the roof and Peurala finally got her
promotion in 1969.

It was not just a victory for her personally, but a victory for all
women in manufacturing. It was also a victory for democracy in the
workplace. The 1974 Consent Decree that was signed by 9 major steel
companies, the steelworkers union and the EEOC was a major step
forward in the battle against racial and gender discrimination in the
industry. Cases like Alice Puerala’s lawsuit helped make that
possible. As a socialist, Peurala understood how divisions within the
working class weakened the power and moral authority of the labor
movement and she was determined to change that.

She was one of the tough, smart working class leaders emerging in the
1960’s who were determined to erase decades of discrimination and
challenge the iron-fisted dictatorial control of the steel company
owners. They would also challenge the leadership of the United Steel
Workers of America and fight for reforms within the union itself.
Peurala would eventually be elected the first woman president of a
steelworkers’ local, but tragically at a time when Corporate America
decided to dismantle US manufacturing, sell it off in pieces and move
much of it abroad.

A Life of Work and Struggle

Peurala was the daughter of Armenian immigrants. Born in 1928 in St.
Louis, she grew up in a family that was well acquainted with
persecution. In the wake of the Armenian genocide perpetrated by
Turkey, her father had deserted the Turkish army and come to the USA
on a false passport. Her mom never did find out what happened to her
parents in the wake of the killings. While her mom stayed at home, her
dad worked as molder in a foundry and served as shop steward in the
union. Her family was pro-union and politically involved in trying to
recover Armenian lands from Turkey, as had been promised by President
Wilson after World War I. Like the children of most immigrant
families, Peurala was well acquainted with hard work, taking her first
job at 14.

`I think probably when I was at the end of the eighth grade, when I
was about 14. I started working as a cashier in a movie house. And
then I worked summers in little two by four factories. I remember
working when I was about fifteen or sixteen the whole summer. One was
a place where they made soles for shoes. And it was a messy job, you
did everything by hand. You had all these things that you cut out and
you soaked them in different solutions.Your hands would get messy and
the solutions would smell terrible.

I used to think in later years it was probably dangerous to your
health. I didn’t think it then because we were making money. It was
only young people working there. There was a place where they made
small tool parts and that. And then I worked in a Venetian blind
factory after school. That’s when I was in high school. I went [to
work] at four and worked until ten everyday. And then I worked all day
on Saturday. They really ended at about twelve, but because I was a
high school student they let me go home at ten.’ – from an interview by
Elizabeth Balanoff

After finishing high school, she took a job in retail and plunged into
the world of organized labor, making friends with union organizer
Bernice Fisher, one of the founders of the Congress of Racial
Equality(CORE). Besides her union activism, Peurala joined sit-ins
against racial discrimination as a member of CORE. Her was union
affiliated with the teamsters district headed up by Harold Gibbons, a
progressive socialist-minded anomaly in a union better known at the
time for its ties with organized crime. Gibbons encouraged women’s
union activism through labor education, attendance at union meetings
and writing articles for the union publications.

A very independent-minded young woman, Peurala left her home in 1950
and traveled to Chicago, much to the dismay of her parents who
expected her to stay home until she was married, as was the custom for
`good’ Armenian girls. She took jobs in Chicago retail stores and
factories, each time working as a union organizer, sometimes winning
union representation and sometimes not. The conditions in some of the
workplaces were terrible, especially where the workers were women. In
a candy factory where she worked briefly, the women who had been there
for years seemed permanently hunched over from the constant bending
that their jobs required.

Because of her leftwing views she was accused of being a communist and
had to fight red-baiting charges during a union representation battle
at a large Stewart-Warner auto parts plant. There were periods when
she was out of a job because of her union organizing work and she
relied on unemployment compensation and the support of her union
friends.

Alice Puerala in South Works

She eventually married, took a job at US Steel’s South Works as a
metallurgical observer, had a child and then quickly divorced the
father because of his alcoholism. A single mom on a swing shift with a
young daughter, she could not do union work for several years.
Fortunately she found a woman who would do childcare for her on a very
flexible schedule. Her steelworker wages allowed her the expense of
childcare plus enough left over to get by. She found work in the steel
mill an interesting challenge.

`I found the steel mill very interesting when I first went in it, very
unique. I guess it was a challenge in a way. I didn’t think too much
about the female-male ratio), about my being in a plant that was
mostly men except that there were men on the job who still, even
though women had been hired in the steel industry during the war and
there were some left (many of them had gone).

There were two other women on the job that I was on and I know when
they hired me they told me that in that particular occupation in the
steel mill they had hired women during the war and there were a number
of women still left on that occupation. It seemed to be one that women
stuck with. So the other women that were in the mill at that time were
not on the occupation I was on. They were either pit recorders ingot
buggy operators or oilers. A lot of them were oilers. They had stayed
since the war.’- from the Balanoff interview.

After her victory in the lawsuit, Peurala started becoming more active
in the union. She joined Steelworkers Fightback, a rank and file
steelworker insurgency group which developed a large following in
District 31 of the steel workers union. Led by a third generation
steelworker named Ed Sadlowski, Steelworkers Fightback introduced a
progressive militancy into the steel industry that had not been seen
since the early days of the CIO. Sadlowski was elected Local 65
president in 1964 at the age of 24 and became District 31 director in
1973. He was unsuccessful in his bid for the national presidency in
1977.

Although steelworkers had finally achieved a modest middle class
lifestyle, the work could still be quite dangerous. There was constant
harassment by supervisors and the mills were rife with racial & gender
discrimination. The national steelworkers leadership had pushed
through the Experimental Negotiating Agreement(ENA), a no-strike
clause in exchange for concessions for the company on wages and other
issues. Steelworkers Fightback was against the ENA and thought that
the national union needed more democracy and more rank and file
participation.

After several attempts at union office in Local 65 which represented
US Steel’s South Works, Puerala was elected to the grievance committee
in 1976.

`Being a griever is very time consuming and it’s very exhausting. When
you are not working, you’re fighting grievances for workers that are
getting suspended and fired. You become involved in those human beings
who are being fired and need their jobs. You rack your brain to do
your best in representing them and it takes a lot out of you. You’re
also working within the union, trying to make your grievance committee
more effective…I have spent a lot of years in the union fighting for
certain things. For example, we passed resolutions against the war in
Vietnam, probably one of the few steelworkers’ local unions that did.
I felt pretty good about that. So many people that I personally like,
and thought a lot of, really didn’t think it could be done.’ – – from
the Balanoff interview

Despite the 1974 Consent Decree, gender discrimination still dominated
the mills. Women were being forced to take sick leave for pregnancy
and made ineligible for unemployment of medical insurance. There were
reports of women feeling compelled to have abortions to survive
economically. Women steelworkers suspected that the companies were
using pregnancy to rid themselves of women they never wanted to hire
in the first place.

There were problems with promotions. Puerala felt that the company was
hiring inexperienced women off the street to do jobs they couldn’t
handle instead of promoting experienced women from inside the plant.
They could then get rid of them before their promotion periods were
up.The new hires were being set up to fail. Another insidious tactic
was suddenly enforcing rules that had been ignored for years when
women were hired. According to Local 65 member Roberta Wood:

`There was an informal agreement between the men working the blast
furnace that they could exchange assignments if they didn’t want to
work a specific job on a particular day. They traded jobs and took
turns on the worst assignments. In the rush to prove that women can’t
do the job, the company came down hard and stupid. The showed us the
rules from the book. This caused a a lot of resentment toward the
women. I think the company knew it would.’ – from conversations with
Mary Margaret Fonow

Inexperienced women felt pressured to prove themselves in situations
that could be dangerous. Diane Gumulauski was seriously injured that
way:

`While I was working on the lids (the coke ovens), I was told to move
these 100 lb lead boxes. I wanted to prove i could do it. That all
women could do it. After the third lift, I ripped open my intestines
and had to be rushed to the hospital. It took surgery and a three
month recover period. What I didn’t know at the time was that no man
would have lifted that much weight. They would have asked for a helper
or simply refused.’ – from the Fonow conversations.

Puerala responded to Gumulauski’s story in anger:

`We can’t allow men to decide what women’s rights are. They aren’t the
ones who’ll get hurt, we are. If those bastards try that trick again,
tell them where to shove it. The men never put up with this shit.’

Puerala helped to organize the Local 65 Women’s Committee as well as
the District 31 Women’s Caucus. Steelworker women activists plunged
themselves into a wide variety of campaigns from fighting for stronger
affirmative action enforcement to improving the decrepit state of the
women’s washrooms. They formed alliances with feminist groups across
the region, refuting the rightwing smear that feminism was only a
movement for privileged white women. They became active in the newly
formed Coalition of Labor Union Women (CLUW).

District 31 made a major push for the passage of the Equal Rights
Amendment (ERA), sending hundreds of steelworkers, both men and women,
to state legislatures to lobby for equal rights. While some local
media tried to make a joke out of `burly male steelworkers’
campaigning for women’s rights, steelworker women didn’t think it was
funny at all. They understood the important of working class
solidarity against social injustice. Peurala herself was also active
in the anti-war and the reproductive rights movement.

Once dubbed `Alice in Wonderland’ by men who thought a woman could
never lead a largely male steelworks local, Alice Peurala won the
presidency of the Local 65 in 1979.

`I did not win as a woman. I campaigned as a candidate who would do
something about conditions in the plant that affect 7500 people – men
and women…People in the plant looked on me as a fighter. I think it
demonstrates that the men in the plant will vote for someone who is
going to for them, make the union work for them.’ – from Rocking the
Boat

But Peurala’s victory came when the American steel industry was about
to collapse. In an atmosphere of fear caused by mass layoffs, she was
was narrowly defeated for re-election in 1982, but was re-elected in
1985. But by 1985, the local was down to 800 members and Alice Peurala
faced a new enemy. – cancer. On June 21, 1986, her steelworker’s heart
went silent and the working class lost one of is finest and most
steadfast leaders.

A Legacy To Remember

`You know what the trouble is, Brucey? We used to make shit in this
country, build shit. Now we just put our hand in the next guy’s
pocket.’-Frank Sobotka, The Wire

Today the dismantling of US manufacturing is usually blamed on
`greedy unions’. That’s nonsense of course. For a brief period, from
the 1950’s to the 1980’s, a little more than one generation, a
significant number of unionized industrial workers achieved a modest
middle class lifestyle. But even then the nature of the work could
take a heavy toll on mind and body. Their middle class status was
always precarious, with workers only one layoff or bad accident away
from serious economic troubles.

As cracks in the American economic dream began to appear in the late
1970’s, the unions representing America’s industrial workers made
concession after concession in an effort to save jobs, concessions
that were largely unsuccessful in doing that. Somehow it was always
the workers who were expected to give up hard won gains or even their
jobs, while top management and financial investors never seem to worry
about how to pay the mortgage or put food on the table when hard times
hit.

Neither government nor private enterprise stepped up to the plate to
create effective job retraining for laid off workers. The hi-tech and
service jobs that were supposed to replace manufacturing proved to be
largely illusionary or low-paid.

Both management and union stumbled, but `greedy workers’ were not the
problem. American manufacturing management was a victim of short term
thinking and a lack of imagination. It did not understand the
importance of a government industrial policy. It was clueless about
how to operate in a global marketplace. It was organized in a topdown
dictatorial bureaucratic manner. Sadly, America’s manufacturing
unions were organized in much the same way.

For all of our brave talk about `democracy’ we don’t apply it to the
area of economics. As a nation we were right to criticize the dismal
results of Soviet style centralized industrial `planning.’ We failed
to see that having our industrial `planning’ done by a relatively
small number of centralized corporations run as virtual dictatorships
wasn’t much of an alternative. The industrial unions clung to much the
same model and many workers gradually became alienated and saw them as
little more than a kind of insurance policy, resulting in low levels
of rank and file involvement. When the time came to fight for
survival, most workers just were not well prepared.

This lack of a democratic culture within US manufacturing was grossly
inefficient. Alice Peurala spent an enormous amount of her time
battling company enforced racial and gender discrimination. One of the
best grievance handlers at South Works, she also spent entirely too
much time fighting back against petty harassment of workers by
supervisors who were trying to impose an atmosphere of fear and
intimidation demanded from the top. She also spent an enormous amount
of her time battling the entrenched leadership of the steelworker’s
union, which was leading rank and file steelworkers to disaster.

Manufacturing is more than just machines and processes. It also about
living breathing people with minds. Imagine if working class leaders
like Peurala had been able to apply their formidable abilities toward
improving the manufacturing process with genuine worker involvement
instead of having to fight for clean washrooms. What a goddam waste of
working class talent, time and energy.

Throughout her life, Alice Peurala was devoted to the idea of
democracy. She was on the right track. If we are to revive
manufacturing as well as the rest of our economy, we will need to do
it differently than in the past. Until we learn how to apply democracy
to our economics we will continue to be trapped in an inefficient,
wasteful, polluting system that degrades our humanity and the planet
we live on.

I never met Alice personally, but saw her at a number of rallies
around Chicago back in the day. A steel worker friend of mine who did
know her said that in addition to being a a tough smart negotiator,
she also played a mean hand of poker. Several retired steelworkers
have contacted me and told of their high regard for her integrity.

Sources Consulted

Interview with Alice Puerala by Elizabeth Balanoff

Harold Gibbons from Wikipedia

Alice Peurala Regains Reins Of Steel Union Local By James Warren.

Alice Peurala, 58, Steel Union Leader By James Warren

The Role of Management in the Decline of the American Steel Industry
by Robert E. Ankli and Eva Sommer

Chicago’s Southeast Side Industrial History by Rod Sellers

Union women: forging feminism in the United Steelworkers of America by
Mary Margaret Fonow

Rusted dreams: hard times in a steel community by David Bensman, Roberta Lynch

Rocking the Boat: Union Women’s Voices by Brigid O’Farrell & Joyce L. Kornbluh

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

http://open.salon.com/blog/bobbosphere/2012/02/10/alice_peurala_a_woman_of_steel

ISTANBUL: Asylum seekers say they will stay despite new law

Hurriyet Daily News, Turkey
Feb 11 2012

Asylum seekers say they will stay despite new law

Vercihan ZiflioÄ?lu
ISTANBUL – Hürriyet Daily News

Despite a new residence law that limits foreigners’ stay in Turkey,
many asylum seekers, gathering every Thrusday in Kumkapı say they will
continue living in the country regardless of the consequences.

Many asylum seekers and illegal immigrants have said they will
continue living in Turkey regardless of the consequences following a
new law that limits foreigners’ stay in the country.

`I have been living as a fugitive for years. Undoubtedly, I would be
unable to return to Turkey if I revealed my identity just once, and
that would spell my end. I have no financial basis to hang onto life,’
Ms. Asdghik, a 60-year-old immigrant from Armenia who has been living
in Turkey for seven years, told the Hürriyet Daily News.

Illegal immigrants and asylum seekers of all types and diverse origins
gather before the Turkish-Armenian Patriarchate in Istanbul’s Kumkapı
district every Thursday to receive clothing and food aid provided for
by the city’s Armenian community and the Turkish Red Crescent.

Among the recipients of the aid are not just Armenians, but also
Georgians, Azerbaijanis, Nigerians, Iraqis, Afghans and Somalis.

Financial constraints

Ms. Asdghik, who is among 3,000 illegal immigrants and asylum seekers
provided for by the Patriarchate, said she was trying to make ends
meet by working as a housemaid and with the assistance she receives.
She said she had not been able to visit Armenia and see her relatives
for seven years due to financial constraints.

`I live in constant fear of deportation. I have not left Turkey for 10
years. Surely I would be penalized severely and never be able to
return back [if I left the country],’ Ms. Seyra, a Georgian citizen
who arrived in Turkey to find employment, told the Daily News.

Ms. Seyra has also expressed great concern in relation to a new law
that came into effect on Feb. 1
The law allows foreign citizens entering the country with a

tourist visa to stay in Turkey for three months, after which time they
will be obliged to wait for another three months abroad before
re-entry.

Certain other residents of foreign origin may also be able to stay in
the country by paying exorbitant insurance premiums.

`Large numbers of illegal immigrants and refugees live in this
vicinity. There are people from all nations, but our troubles and
concerns are identical. I hope they do not deport us destitute people
from here with the new law,’ Ms. Ghanımbala, a 45-year-old Azerbaijani
residing in the district of Kumkapı, told the Daily News.

The patriarchate is striving to provide aid to 3,000 illegal
immigrants and refugees within the limits of their means, according to
Linda Süme, the head of the Patriarchate’s Clothing, Wares and Food
Aid Branch.
February/11/2012